eProcurement Data Analytics

ISA2 Coordination Group meeting 16th October, 2019 - Brussels

Carmen Ciciriello

Introduction

Following the Commission invitation to submit proposals for the reviewofthe ISA2WorkProgrammefor theyear2020,AGIDpreparedaproposaloneProcurementDataAnalytics.

ThedigitaltransformationofPublicProcurementisastrategicprojectinthe3-yearICTPlanforthePublicAdministration.AGIDroleandactivities:•  Responsiblefordeploymentandmonitoringofthedigitaltransformation

ofPublicProcurementatthenationallevel•  Coordinates technical groups for aspects in scope with the Public

ProcurementCode•  EstablishingtheeProcurementCompetenceCentre

PubliceProcurementinItaly

4

eProcurementchallenges

Lack of quality data

Insufficientsharingandrecyclingofdata

Inabilitytomatchrelateddatafromdifferentdatabasesandsystems

Preventingeffectivedata-drivendecisions

Shortageofskillsandtoolsforanalysingavailableinformation

DuplicationofeffortsinMemberStatestoresolvethesameproblems

Objectives

“ToestablishacommonEuropeanframeworkandinfrastructureformonitoring public procurement across the EU, through a set ofanalytical servicesand toolsbasedona commondata structure, inorder to foster effective government spending, active commonpolicy-makingandSingleMarketcompetitiveness.“

ConceptualImplementationModel:1.  Structure the EU eProcurement data lake making use of the

eProcurementOntology.2.  Feed theEUeProcurementdatabase re-usingexistingTEDprocurement

data(migration).3.  Collect TED procurement data (from notices, awards, payments, etc.)

makinguseofthemappingbetweeneProcurementeForms(EUstandard)andtheeProcurementOntology.

4.  Provide a platform to access relevant Open Data to stakeholders andtoolstoanalysethemasLinkedOpenData,afteranassessmentof‘whatdata’and‘who’canaccessit.

5.  Re-useBuildingBlocks(e.g.CEFBigDataTestInfrastructure).

Howtoachievetheseobjectives

WhythisproposalisrelevanttotheISA2objectives:1.  It implements theEIF recommendation30, supporting thedevelopment

of the commonpublic procurement semantic,using the eProcurementOntologyandprovidinginformationaslinkedopendata.

2.  ItwillbenefitallMemberStatesthathavetoimplementtheneweForms.3.  Itexploresthere-useoftheeProcurementanalyticsframeworkandtools

in other sectorswhere information from databases (e.g. BRIS) can begatheredandmadeavailable.

Relevance

8

Interest from Member States InterestfromMemberStates

Thankyou