EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in Detergent Solutions: “Immobilized Species” in the...

7
EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in Detergent Solutions: ‘‘Immobilized Species’’ in the Absence of Protein Stefan Kuntz Fabian Leinisch Ka ´lma ´n Hideg Wolfgang E. Trommer Received: 2 June 2009 / Published online: 19 November 2009 Ó Springer 2009 Abstract Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of 5-doxyl-stearic acid, 3-(2- Dodecyl-1-oxyl-5,5-dimethylpyrrolidin-2-yl)propanoic acid radical (4-proxyl-pal- mitic acid) and of 3-(1-Oxyl-2,5-dimethyl-5-dodecylpyrrolidine-2-yl)propanoic acid radical (4-azetoxyl-stearic acid) in lipid micelles of nonaethyleneglycol-mono- dodecyl ether (C 12 E 9 ) and pentaethyleneglycol-monooctyl ether (C 8 E 5 ) can reveal immobilized components typical of spin-labeled protein-bound fatty acids as well as phospholipids. The occurrence of such species depends on the detergent, the relative orientation of the nitroxide group with respect to the longitudinal axis and the molecular structure of the fatty acid as well as on polarity and ionic strength of the aqueous phase. Whereas 5-doxyl-stearic acid and 4-proxyl-palmitic acid exhibited these highly immobilized components in C 12 E 9 micelles but not in C 8 E 5 , only a single relatively mobile component was observed with 4-azetoxyl-stearic acid in both detergents. The immobilized component is lost by the addition of isopropanol but not as much by ethanol and also when distilled water is substituted for the buffer. 1 Introduction Binding of annular lipids and fatty acids to membrane proteins has often been followed by means of spin-labeled derivatives. For an early review see Ref. [1]. The corresponding electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra are then typical for S. Kuntz F. Leinisch W. E. Trommer (&) Department of Chemistry, Kaiserslautern University of Technology, Postfach 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany e-mail: [email protected] K. Hideg Institute of Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, University of Pe ´cs, Pecs, Hungary 123 Appl Magn Reson (2010) 37:455–461 DOI 10.1007/s00723-009-0057-8 Applied Magnetic Resonance

Transcript of EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in Detergent Solutions: “Immobilized Species” in the...

Page 1: EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in Detergent Solutions: “Immobilized Species” in the Absence of Protein

EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in DetergentSolutions: ‘‘Immobilized Species’’ in the Absenceof Protein

Stefan Kuntz • Fabian Leinisch • Kalman Hideg •

Wolfgang E. Trommer

Received: 2 June 2009 / Published online: 19 November 2009

� Springer 2009

Abstract Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of 5-doxyl-stearic acid, 3-(2-

Dodecyl-1-oxyl-5,5-dimethylpyrrolidin-2-yl)propanoic acid radical (4-proxyl-pal-

mitic acid) and of 3-(1-Oxyl-2,5-dimethyl-5-dodecylpyrrolidine-2-yl)propanoic acid

radical (4-azetoxyl-stearic acid) in lipid micelles of nonaethyleneglycol-mono-

dodecyl ether (C12E9) and pentaethyleneglycol-monooctyl ether (C8E5) can reveal

immobilized components typical of spin-labeled protein-bound fatty acids as well as

phospholipids. The occurrence of such species depends on the detergent, the relative

orientation of the nitroxide group with respect to the longitudinal axis and the

molecular structure of the fatty acid as well as on polarity and ionic strength of the

aqueous phase. Whereas 5-doxyl-stearic acid and 4-proxyl-palmitic acid exhibited

these highly immobilized components in C12E9 micelles but not in C8E5, only a

single relatively mobile component was observed with 4-azetoxyl-stearic acid in

both detergents. The immobilized component is lost by the addition of isopropanol

but not as much by ethanol and also when distilled water is substituted for the

buffer.

1 Introduction

Binding of annular lipids and fatty acids to membrane proteins has often been

followed by means of spin-labeled derivatives. For an early review see Ref. [1]. The

corresponding electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra are then typical for

S. Kuntz � F. Leinisch � W. E. Trommer (&)

Department of Chemistry, Kaiserslautern University of Technology, Postfach 3049,

67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany

e-mail: [email protected]

K. Hideg

Institute of Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary

123

Appl Magn Reson (2010) 37:455–461

DOI 10.1007/s00723-009-0057-8

Applied

Magnetic Resonance

Page 2: EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in Detergent Solutions: “Immobilized Species” in the Absence of Protein

one or even several highly immobilized components with the hyperfine structure

2Azz values of 45 G and more in a hydrophobic environment [2]. However, spin-

labeled lipids and even spin-labeled fatty acids may exhibit EPR spectra similar if

not identical to those in the presence of proteins to which they may be bound and

hence, leading to misinterpretation of data obtained in the presence of the protein.

Here we describe the EPR spectra of 5-doxyl-stearic acid and of 3-(1-oxyl-2,

5-dimethyl-5-dodecylpyrrolidine-2-yl)propanoic acid radical (4-azetoxyl-stearic

acid) as well as of 3-(2-dodecyl-1-oxyl-5,5-dimethylpyrrolidin-2-yl)propanoic acid

radical (4-proxyl-palmitic acid) (Fig. 1) under various conditions in nonaethyle-

neglycol-monododecyl ether (C12E9) and pentaethyleneglycol-monooctyl ether

(C8E5) (Fig. 2) micelles in the absence of any proteins.

2 Materials and Methods

4-Proxyl-palmitic acid and 4-azetoxyl-stearic acid were synthesized as previously

described in [3]. 5-Doxyl-stearic acid, nonaethyleneglycol-monododecyl ether

and pentaethyleneglycol-monooctyl ether were purchased from Sigma. All other

chemicals were of a reagent grade from various sources.

Fig. 1 Structural formulasof 5-doxyl-palmitic acid (a),4-azetoxyl-stearic acid (b) andof 4-proxyl-palmitic acid (c)

aCH3(CH2)11(OCH2CH2)9OH

bCH3(CH2)7(OCH2CH2)5OH

Fig. 2 Structural formulas of nonaethyleneglycol-monododecyl ether (C12E9) (a) and pentaethyleneglycol-monooctyl ether (C8E5) (b)

456 S. Kuntz et al.

123

Page 3: EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in Detergent Solutions: “Immobilized Species” in the Absence of Protein

3 EPR Spectroscopy

EPR spectra were measured on a Bruker Elexsys E580 EPR spectrometer operating in

the X-band mode (9.7 GHz). A dielectric cavity was used for all the experiments. EPR

spectra were recorded at 297 K with a scan width of 100 G and a center field of

3452 G. The microwave power was set to 8 mW, and the receiver gain to 72 dB at a

modulation amplitude of 1 G. The baseline was subtracted from the recorded spectra.

4 Results

4.1 EPR Spectra of 4-Proxyl-Palmitic Acid and 5-Doxyl-Stearic Acid

in the Presence of C12E9 and C8E5 Micelles

Figure 3a shows the EPR spectrum of 4-proxyl-palmitic acid in micelles of

nonaethyleneglycol-monododecyl ether (C12E9). The spectrum exhibits two distinct

peaks each in the low-field as well as the high-field region as indicated by arrows.

Besides a weakly immobilized component denoted 1, a second strongly immobi-

lized component 2 with an Azz value of 46.5 G is clearly visible. In contrast, the

spectrum of the same compound, 4-proxyl-palmitic acid, in the presence of

pentaethyleneglycol-monooctyl ether (C8E5) shows one component, only (Fig. 3b)

typical of weak immobilization. Hence, switching from C12E9 to C8E5 has a strong

effect on the resulting EPR spectra.

Fig. 3 EPR spectra of 100 lM4-proxyl-palmitic acid in thepresence of C12E9 and C8E5

micelles contained in 0.1 MTris–HCl, 2 mM Tris–EDTA,pH 7.2, at 24 �C. a 1% C12E9

and b 1% C8E5

EPR Spectra of Spin-Labeled Fatty Acids in Detergents 457

123

Page 4: EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in Detergent Solutions: “Immobilized Species” in the Absence of Protein

Corresponding measurements with 5-doxyl-stearic acid yielded very similar

results as shown in Fig. 4a, b. Again, two components were observed with C12E9 as

detergent (Fig. 4a), whereas in C8E5 only a weakly immobilized species is seen

(Fig. 4b). Although the concentration of 5-doxyl-stearic acid was the same as that of

the proxyl derivative (100 lM), the signal intensities were considerably lower. As

has been found out later, the nitroxide group of the analog was partially reduced.

However, this should not have affected our results.

4.2 EPR Spectra of 4-Azetoxyl-Stearic Acid in the Presence of C12E9 and C8E5

Micelles

The nitroxide group of 4-azetoxyl-stearic acid is oriented perpendicular to the long

axis of the fatty acid as can be seen in Fig. 1. EPR spectra of this analog did not

show the immobilized component even in the presence of C12E9 (Fig. 5) as was

observed for 4-proxyl-palmitic and 5-doxyl-stearic acid. C8E5 yielded a virtually

identical spectrum (data not shown).

4.3 Effects of Organic Solvent and Ionic Strength on the EPR Spectra

of 4-Proxyl-Palmitic Acid in the Presence of C12E9 Micelles

Since fatty acids and, certainly their spin-labeled derivatives as well, are barely

soluble in water, stock solutions are often prepared in organic solvents and aliquots

Fig. 4 EPR spectra of 200 lM5-doxyl-stearic acid in thepresence of C12E9 and C8E5

micelles contained in 0.1 MTris–HCl, 2 mM Tris–EDTA,pH 7.2, at 24 �C. a 1% C12E9

and b 1% C8E5

458 S. Kuntz et al.

123

Page 5: EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in Detergent Solutions: “Immobilized Species” in the Absence of Protein

added to the aqueous biological system. However, the resulting EPR spectra can

vary dramatically with the final concentration of the organic solvent. Figure 6 shows

the effect of isopropanol on the EPR spectra of 4-proxyl-palmitic acid in C12E9 with

the immobilized component completely disappearing at 16% of the organic solvent.

In contrast, ethanol had virtually no effect on the spectral line shape up to 25%.

Very similar effects were observed in relation to the ionic strength of the aqueous

phase (Fig. 7). In distilled water the immobilized component is almost completely

lost with but a slight broadening of the high-field minimum. Upon going from 1 M

Fig. 5 EPR spectrum of100 lM 4-azetoxyl-stearic acidin the presence of 1% C12E9

micelles contained in 0.1 MTris–HCl, 2 mM Tris–EDTA,pH 7.2, at 24 �C

Fig. 6 EPR spectra of 100 lM4-proxyl-palmitic acid in thepresence of 1% C12E9 micellescontained in 0.1 M Tris–HCl,2 mM Tris–EDTA, pH 7.2, at24 �C. a In the presence ofincreasing concentrations ofisopropanol and b of ethanol

EPR Spectra of Spin-Labeled Fatty Acids in Detergents 459

123

Page 6: EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in Detergent Solutions: “Immobilized Species” in the Absence of Protein

to 100 and 10 mM Tris–HCl, the ratio between the low-field amplitudes gradually

shifts towards the more mobile component (Fig. 7).

5 Discussion

This study does not claim to provide novel insights in the understanding of EPR

spectra of spin-labeled fatty acids in membranes or detergents. However, it is shown

that various experimental parameters may easily lead to erroneous interpretation of

the data, and that the kind of even closely related detergents may play a significant

role. Most of the early studies focused on ordered lipid multilayers and/or the

angular dependence of the resulting EPR spectra [4, 5]. Indeed, spectral differences

and even two-component systems in liposomes composed of natural lipid mixtures

have been observed in the absence of proteins depending on the position of the spin

label along the fatty acid chain [6]. Doxyl-fatty acids with the spin label at position

five exhibited two components, whereas with the12-doxyl derivate a shoulder was

observed and a single component in case of 16-doxyl. Clearly, the far more

restricted motion near the polar head group allows for detection of the parallel and

perpendicular components of the hyperfine structure A-tensor, Ak and A\ as was

nicely shown for 5-doxyl-tricosanoic acid [7]. Due to the increasing flexibility the

motional differences and the resulting anisotropy are averaged out further down the

chain.

To the best of our knowledge, here we report for the first time significant

detergent-dependent spectral differences in the absence of orientation-dependent

anisotropy. Clearly, larger liposomes exhibit reduced rotational correlation times and

hence, larger 2 Azz values of the incorporated spin-labeled fatty acids. The size of

micelles composed of ethyleneglycol-derived detergents depends on the length of

their apolar moiety [8]. The EPR spectra, however, also reveal that not only the

overall tumbling rate is reduced, but a restricted motion of the spin-labeled fatty

acids in C12E9 and thus, allowing for distinct parallel and perpendicular components.

This is seen only with the 4-proxyl- and 5-doxyl fatty acids, not with 4-azetoxyl-

stearic acid. In the latter, the nitroxide group is oriented perpendicular to the long

Fig. 7 EPR spectra of 100 lM4-proxyl-palmitic acid in thepresence of 1% C12E9 micellesat 24 �C contained in 2 mMTris–EDTA, pH 7.2, at 24 �C atdifferent concentrations of Tris–HCl

460 S. Kuntz et al.

123

Page 7: EPR Spectra of Spin-labeled Fatty Acids in Detergent Solutions: “Immobilized Species” in the Absence of Protein

axis and not parallel as in the former. The reason for the almost complete averaging

of the anisotropic components of the hyperfine interaction most likely resides in the

molecular geometry with the nitroxide moiety fully integrated in the elongated

molecule. All these effects, however, are not observed in the smaller C8E5 micelles.

The addition of organic solvents allows the detergent as well as the spin-labeled

fatty acids to dissolve in the ‘‘aqueous phase’’ and thus, reducing the motional

restriction. In this respect, isopropanol is more efficient than ethanol (Fig. 6).

Likewise, a higher salt concentration stabilizes separate aqueous and detergent

phases (Fig. 7).

In conclusion, binding studies of spin-labeled fatty acids and lipids to membrane

proteins solubilized in detergents require careful controls in the absence of protein.

References

1. O.H. Griffith, P.C. Jost, L.J. Berliner (eds.), Spin Labeling: Theory and Applications (Academic Press,

New York, 1976), pp. 454–523

2. P. Jezek, M. Bauer, W.E. Trommer, FEBS. Lett. 361, 303–307 (1995)

3. M. Balog, C. Abe, T. Kalai, H.-J. Steinhoff, J. Jeko, K. Hideg, Synthesis. 1663–1670 (2007)

4. I.C.P. Smith, K.W. Butler, L.J. Berliner (eds.), Spin Labeling: Theory and Applications (Academic

Press, New York, 1976), pp. 411–451

5. D. Marsh, G. Cevec, Phospholipid Bilayers, Physical Principles and Models (Wiley, Chichester, 1987)

6. P.J. Dehlinger, P.C. Jost, O.H. Griffith, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 71, 2280–2284 (1974)

7. W.L. Hubbell, H.M. McConnell, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 64, 20–27 (1969)

8. A. Helenius, D. McCaslin, E. Fries, C. Tanford, Methods Enzymol. 56, 734–749 (1979)

EPR Spectra of Spin-Labeled Fatty Acids in Detergents 461

123