Epidemiology, genetics and pathophysiology: Diagnostic ......YEUNG, CHUNG K., SREEDHAR, BIJI, SIHOE,...
Transcript of Epidemiology, genetics and pathophysiology: Diagnostic ......YEUNG, CHUNG K., SREEDHAR, BIJI, SIHOE,...
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Epidemiology, genetics and pathophysiology: Diagnostic Approach -
Johan van de Walle (Belgium) ICCS Cape Town 2012
2 2 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Use it as national monument
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Epidemiology
Johan Vande Walle (Belgium) ICCS Cape Town 2012
4 4 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Epidemiology of MNE /NMNE ! All available epidemiological studies do mix up
! Monosymptomatic ! And non monosymptomatic enuresis
! Do not take in account difference between ! Primary care / tertiary care / pediatrics /Urology
! Difference according terminology ! DMSIV / ICCS old /ICCS new
! Methodology of reporting ! Selfreporting, Questionnaire, Phone call
! Severe versus less severe enuresis ! Non-reporting of this “taboe” disease
! cfr Hong Kong : increase from from 2.5-10% over 10 year
5 5 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
THE TOWER OF BABEL: CONFUSION IN TERMINOLOGY
ICD-10
ICCS “new ICCS-definition
6 6 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Pediatrician Psychological
Maturation Minimal invasiveapproach
Urologist Bladder
Maximal invasive approach
??
7 7 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 20 y later : all “friends”
8 8 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Bedwetting Epidemiology § Primary Nocturnal Enuresis is common in children and adolescents
§ Estimated prevalence of frequent bedwetting:1-5
§ Up to 25% of children aged 4 years § 10% of children aged 7 years
§ With increasing age: § Prevalence decreases1-5 § Frequency and severity increases6,7
1. Fergusson et al. Behav Psychother 1986; 78:884-890 2. Foxman et al. Pediatrics 1986; 77: 482-487 3. Hellstrom et al. Eur J Pediatr 1990; 149: 434-437 4. Watanabe & Kawauchi. Scan J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1994; 163: 29-38 5. de jonge, Kovin et al (eds) Bladder control and enuresis 1973: 39-46 6. Wadsworth. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1944; 14: 313 7.Turner & Taylor. Behav Res Ther 1974; 12: 41-52
9 9 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Bedwetting is a Worldwide Disease with Comparable Prevalence Rates (5-15 years)
35%
21.3%, 17.6% 23.8% 15% 18.6% 9.1%
8%
8%- 5.5%
3.2% 6% 7% 23%, 4%
13.7%, 12.4%, 17.5%, 11.5% 16% 16%
10 10 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Bedwetting is a Worldwide Disease with Comparable Prevalence Rates (5-15 years)
35%
21.3%, 17.6% 23.8% 15% 18.6% 9.1%
8%
8%- 5.5%
3.2% 6% 7% 23%, 4%
13.7%, 12.4%, 17.5%, 11.5% 16% 16%
11 11 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Higher Frequency of Bedwetting in Boys
YEUNG, CHUNG K., SREEDHAR, BIJI, SIHOE, JENNIFER D.Y., SIT, FRANCES K.Y. & LAU, JOSEPH. Differences in characteristics of nocturnal enuresis between children and adolescents: a critical appraisal from a large epidemiological study.BJU International 97 (5), 1069-1073.
Age (years)
Prevalence (%)
Boys All
Girls
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Higher Frequency of Bedwetting in Boys
YEUNG, CHUNG K., SREEDHAR, BIJI, SIHOE, JENNIFER D.Y., SIT, FRANCES K.Y. & LAU, JOSEPH. Differences in characteristics of nocturnal enuresis between children and adolescents: a critical appraisal from a large epidemiological study.BJU International 97 (5), 1069-1073.
Age (years)
Prevalence (%)
Boys All
Girls
13 13 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Severe Bedwetting is Persistent
YEUNG, CHUNG K., SREEDHAR, BIJI, SIHOE, JENNIFER D.Y., SIT, FRANCES K.Y. & LAU, JOSEPH. Differences in characteristics of nocturnal enuresis between children and adolescents: a critical appraisal from a large epidemiological study. BJU International 97 (5), 1069-1073.
Age (years)
Prevalence (%)
<3 wet nights per week 3-6 wet nights per week 7 wet nights per week
14 14 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Severe Bedwetting is Persistent
YEUNG, CHUNG K., SREEDHAR, BIJI, SIHOE, JENNIFER D.Y., SIT, FRANCES K.Y. & LAU, JOSEPH. Differences in characteristics of nocturnal enuresis between children and adolescents: a critical appraisal from a large epidemiological study. BJU International 97 (5), 1069-1073.
Age (years)
Prevalence (%)
<3 wet nights per week 3-6 wet nights per week 7 wet nights per week
15 15 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
50% of Adolescent Bedwetting are Severe Cases
Age 5 Age 19
30%
14%
56% 49%
41%
10%
<3 wet nights per week 3-6 wet nights per week 7 wet nights per week
Yeung et al. BJU Int 2006; 97: 1069-1073
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Child Bedwetting – Nocturnal Enuresis
Pathogenesis / pathophysiology
17 17 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
In the beginning… ! Enuresis usually just
meant wetting ! Nocturnal enuresis
just meant bedwetting ! Both were thought to
be psychiatric disorders
18 18 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
19 19 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 11-6-2001 Vande Walle
enuresis fabels
20 20 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Zal ik het hem eens vertellen waarom ik in bed plas ?
21 21 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Pediatrician + psychologists It ‘s the child
Urologist It s the bladder
??
22 22 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
PSYCHOLOGICAL ,
23 23 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
24 24 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
25 25 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
What is true ?
26 26 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
27 27 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Genetics
Johan Vande Walle (Belgium) ICCS Cape Town 2012
29 29 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Genetics ! Strong genetic predisposition with significant
modulatory effects by somatic and psychosocial environmental factors
! Positive family history in 63% ! Autosomal dominant transmission with
high penetrance (90%) and complex genetic heterogeneity
! About 1/3 cases sporadic, with no significant phenotypic differences between sporadic and familial forms
von Gontard et al. J Urol 2001;166:2438–2443
30 30 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
! 77% risk where both parents had been enuretics as a child
! 43% risk where only one parent had been enuretic as a child
! 15% risk where there is no parental history of enuresis
! 40% siblings also had PNE
Parental history
Bakwin. Am J Dis Child 1971;121;222–225; Jarvelin et al. Acta Paediatr Scand 1988;77:148–153
31 31 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Family studies in nocturnal enuresis
Why do we believe that nocturnal
enuresis is a genetic disorder?
! Indicates the presence of genetic effects but do not prove it
Study One
parent Both
parents The father The mother Siblings
First degree relatives
Cousins and
uncles +
Frary 1930 32% 23%
Hallgren 1957 39% 23%
Bakwin 1961 72 % 20% 40% of siblings
Elian 1984 and 1991
73% of families
83% of families
Gontard 1997 23% 24% 17% of siblings
Schaumburg 2001 73%
} Familial occurrence is well recognized (Janet 1890 and Monro 1896)
32 32 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Linkage studies of nocturnal enuresis Chromosome LOD-score Marker Study OMIM
4p* 3.66 D4S2960 Eiberg 2001
8q - D8S264 Eiberg 1995
12q 4.2 D12S80 Dahl 1995 Arnell 1996 +1997 ENUR2
13q 3.55 D13S291 Eiberg 1995 ENUR1
2.67 D13S263
22q 4.51 D22S446 - D22S343 Eiberg 1998 ENUR3
What have we learned from
molecular genetic studies?
! Locus heterogeneity in nocturnal enuresis
! Linkage to 13q, 12q, and 22q have been confirmed in independent families
! More loci exists as families have been reported with no linkage in these regions
33 33 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Molecular genetics ! Linkage studies have identified different genetic
loci associated with PNE on chromosomes 4, 8, 12, 13 and 22
! ‘Genetic heterogeneity’ ! No relation genotype /phenotype B Loeys
Eiberg et al. J Urol 2001;166:2401–2403
34 34 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
What is true ?
35 35 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Mono- symptomatic Polyuria Small
bladder Dysfunctional
voiding
36 36 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Mono- symptomatic Polyuria Small
bladder Dysfunctional
voiding
37 37 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Mono- symptomatic Polyuria Small
bladder Dysfunctional
voiding
38 38 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Mono- symptomatic Polyuria Small
bladder Dysfunctional
voiding
39 39 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Polyuria
Small bladder capacity
Deep sleep arousal
Bedwetting Occurs as a Result of Two or More Causes
Bedwetting Bedwetting
40 40 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Abnormal circadian rhythm of ADH secretion
Developmental delay
Psychosomatic manifestation
Sleep-arousal disturbances
Bladder detrusor/sphincter
dysfunction Abnormal bladder reservoir function
Genetic predisposition
Primary Nocturnal Enuresis
Pathophysiology of PNE
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
NOCTURNAL ENURESIS abnormal circadian rhytm vasopressin
primary
J.Vande Walle Pediatric uro-nefrologic center Ghent 12 Sept 2011
42 42 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Diurnal variation of antidiuretic hormone (vasopressin) secretion
Plasma vasopressin
Day Night
Urine osmolality
Day Night
Urine volume
Day Night
Normal children Enuretic children
43 43 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Nocturnal vasopressin levels: ‘dry’ vs ‘wet’ nights
1.8
Hansen et al. J Urol 2001;166:2452–2455
Desmopressin responders Desmopressin non-responders
0 0.2 0.4
0.8
1.4
Dry night
0.6
1.0 1.2
1.6
Wet night *p=0.004
*
*
Plas
ma
vaso
pres
sin
(pg/
mL)
44 44 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
3 subtypes of nocturnal polyuria with low urinary osmolality
! inversed circadian rhytm of diuresis ! nocturnal diuresis > 50% of 24h diuresis ! short period of high diuresis with low urinary
osmolality overnight = fast filling rate ! Related to high 24 h fluid intake
2.Abnormal circadian rhytm of diuresis 3 subtypes
45 45 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Nocturnal diuresis is related to
! 24 h diuresis and thus 24h fluid intake
! But what is primum movens ! High fluid intake ! Higher diuresis overnight ! Suboptimal maximal
concentrating capacity
Abnormal circadian rhytm of diuresis related to fluid intake
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
NOCTURNAL ENURESIS abnormal circadian rythm vasopressin
secundary
J.Vande Walle Pediatric uro-nefrologic center Ghent 12 Sept 2011
47 47 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
• Renal diabetes insipidus • X-linked RDI : partial forms in heterozygotic girls
• Renal diseases are associated with decreased renal concentrating capacity
• Although the lack of anti-diuresis does not appear to be caused by a renal defect in the majority of patients,
• since the kidney is able to concentrate urine normally, although the values do vary between 850 to >1200 mosmol/l (range of normal concentrating capacity).
• There is a subgroup of patients who fail to concentrate > 850 mmol/l
abnormal concentrating capacity
48 48 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
subnormal concentrating capacity fig 2
collections
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
U o
smo
l (m
osm
ol/l
)
600
800
1000
1200
1400
dDAVP nasal spray 2 puff's + water-restrictiondDAVP nasal spay 2 puff's + water-load
7- 10 h2 -7 h2 h1 h0 h- 1h
n Up to 20% does not reach urinary osmolality values > 850 mosmol/l
p < O.O1 * * * * * dDAVP
2 nasal spray
49 49 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
3.subnormal concentrating capacity fig 2
collections
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
U o
smo
l (m
osm
ol/l
)
600
800
1000
1200
1400
dDAVP nasal spray 2 puff's + water-restrictiondDAVP nasal spay 2 puff's + water-load
7- 10 h2 -7 h2 h1 h0 h- 1h
n Up to 20% does not reach urinary osmolality values > 850 mosmol/l
n Fluid intake prior to desmopressin results in lower / later / shorter maximal concentrating capacity
p < O.O1 * * * * * dDAVP
2 nasal spray
50 50 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
4.Abnormal circadian rhythm of diuresis related to osmotic load / excretion
Strong correlation between nocturnal diuresis volume
! Nocturnal osmotic excretion ! 24 h osmotic excretion ! And thus nutritional intake
! Primary ?? ! Secundary??
51 51 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Abnormal circadian rhythm of osmotic excretion
! 3 subtypes High osmotic excretion
! (J. Dehoorne J Urol 2006)
52 52 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Fig1
urine-collections1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
osm
otic
exc
retio
n (m
osm
ol/k
g/h)
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
Fig2
urine-collections
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
diur
esis
-rate
(ml/k
g/h)
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
Fig3
urine-collections
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
U o
smol
(mos
mol
/kg)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Group 1: high 24 h intake, high 24 h excretion of solute, sodium and water, obese children
53 53 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Fig1
urine-collections1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
osm
otic
exc
retio
n (m
osm
ol/k
g/h)
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
Fig2
urine-collections
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
diur
esis
-rate
(ml/k
g/h)
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
Fig3
urine-collections
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
U o
smol
(mos
mol
/kg)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Group 2: (high) Normal 24 h intake, normal 24 h excretion But high nocturnal excretion of osmol and water high osmotic load in the evening
54 54 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Fig1
urine-collections1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
osm
otic
exc
retio
n (m
osm
ol/k
g/h)
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,4
1,6
Fig2
urine-collections
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
diur
esis
-rate
(ml/k
g/h)
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
Fig3
urine-collections
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
U o
smol
(mos
mol
/kg)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
group 3:normal 24 h intake, normal 24 h excretion But high nocturnal excretion of osmol and water Small bladder volume Low fluid intake during daytime (defense mechanism) Low osmotic excretion during daytime
55 55 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Abnormal circadian rhytm of sodium excretion
! High 24 h urinary sodium excretion ! Kuzenetsova in random population : Yes ! Kamperis (JAmPhys 2006) :No
! Abnormal circadian rhythm of sodium-handling ! Kamperis (J Am Phys 2006): yes ! A. Raes (J Urol 2006) probably related to
primary tubular sodium-handling disorder in distal tubulus
! Abnormal circadian rhythm of bloodpressure
56 56 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
controls non-polyurics polyurics dry night
E-Na (mmol/h/kg) FE-Na (%)
8–12 12–16 16–20 20–bed night 0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
P<0.01
NS NS NS NS
8–12 12–16 16–20 20–bed night 0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
P<0.001
NS NS NS NS
Clearance periods Clearance periods
Kamperis. PhD thesis 2004
Polyurics excrete more sodium at night
57 57 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
6.Abnormal circadian rhythm of prostaglandins
Kamperis: Nocturnal polyuria = Higher PG overnight
58 58 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Absence of circadian rhythm of GFR only in MNE +NP
Control Group MNE-NP−
(20)
Study Group MNE-NP+
(15)
Uvol (ml/min) 1.7 ± 0.4/0.8 ± 0.4*
1.0 ± 0.3†/1.7 ± 0.5†
GFR(ml/min/1.73m²) 126 ± 25/112 ± 23* 121 ± 27/119 ± 29
FE Na (%) 1.1±0.6/0.6±0.4* 0.8±0.2/1.0±0.4†
†: p<0.05 between the two groups * : p<0.05 between day and nighttime
Deguchtenaere A et al. J Uro 2007;178:2626-2629
59 59 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
THE COMORBIDITIES
60 60 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Constipatie/diarree
61 61 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
encopresis
62 62 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 11-6-2001 Vande Walle
enuresis fabels
ATTENTION DEFICIT
63 63 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Cognitive disturbances night-time wetting enuresis in children 1. The CK Yeung theory 2. Is there evidence ? 3. Can we extrapolate to nocturia in adults?
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent Normal Children
Bladder Behaviour and Sleep Changes
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent Enuretic Children
Bladder Behaviour and Sleep Changes
67 67 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
68 68 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Theory from CK Yeung
! Nocturnal enuresis ! Causes sleep disturbance
! Overstimulation of central brain
! Cognitive dysfunction ! Treatment of nocturnal enuresis
! Amelioration of sleep ! Less exhaustion of the brain
! Amelioration of cognitive function
69 69 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Nocturnal
Polyuria NOCTURIA
Reduced Nocturnal Bladder Capacity
NOCTURIA Impaired Arousal Response
to Bladder Fullness
Pathophysiology of MNE ( A heterogeneous disorder )
Nocturnal Enuresis
© 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
MNE
treatment
71 71 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Why to treat?
! Emotional impact ! Poor self esteem ! Social impact ! Parenteral impact /intolerance ! Sleepdisturbances ! Relation to attention deficet
72 72 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
1. Who should treat the patient ?
2. When to treat the patient
3. Treatment of choice
4. Which patient to treat ?
73 73 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
How to treat?
! Practical guidelines ! J. Vande Walle, S.Bauer, S Tekgull, J Evans, S
Rittig, P Eggert ! Eur J Pediatrics 2012
74 74 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Step 1
! Step 1 Urotherapy advice ! Step 2 based on clinical management tool
75 75 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Child ≥5 years who wets bed
Advice (eg causes, fluid and food intake)
CMT questioning Physical examination and dipstick
Symptoms suggestive of bladder dysfunction/comorbidity?
YES: Treat these first/refer if
necessary NO: MNE
Advice on treatment options: shared decision based on preferences,
motivation and diary if completed
Alarm Desmopressin
Strategy 1 = MINIMAL
76 76 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
screening
! Evidence for MNE or NMNE ! Identifying comorbidities that might interfere with
response-rates ! Compliance ! Combined disorder ! Constipation/ encopresis ! History of UTI, uropathy, day time symptoms ! ADHD, ADD, autism ! Mentally and motoric disability ! Sleeping disorders (snorring, waking up, restless legs )
77 77 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Practical consensus guidelines for the management of nocturnal enuresis in children seen in primary care
! screening minimal ! Clinical history ! Clinical examination
! Screening optimal ! Daytime diary ! Nighttime diary
78 78 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
PNE treatment: tailor to pathophysiology
! Normal urine output/normal bladder capacity ! Let the family choose either alarm or desmopressin
! Nocturnal polyuria ! Initiate desmopressin treatment
! Low FBC/high arousal threshold ! Initiate alarm treatment
! If one treatment fails, try: ! Desmopressin plus alarm (nocturnal polyuria/low
FBC/high arousal threshold) ! Desmopressin plus anticholinergics (nocturnal
polyuria/nocturnal detrusor instability)
79 79 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Voided volumes/NP help guide treatment choice in Strategy 2
EXTENSION
Child ≥5 years who wets bed
Advice (eg causes, fluid and food intake)
CMT questioningPhysical examination and dipstick
Night + daytimeDiary
Symptoms suggestive of bladder dysfunction/comorbidity?
YES: Treat these first/refer if
necessaryNO: MNE
Advice on treatment options:shared decision based on preferences,
motivation and diary if completed
Alarm(reduced MVV)
Desmopressin(NP)
Strategy 2 = OPTIMAL
80 80 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Alarm
Medical follow-up contact 1–2 times/month
No improvement
Clinical re-evaluation (including diary)
Confirmation of MNEChange treatment
Improvement
Continue alarm with regular re-evaluation
Dry for 14 consecutive nights
Discontinuation
Advise family to resume
contact/treatment if relapse
No improvement at 6–8 weeks
Combination alarm + desmopressin or refer to specialist
81 81 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Desmopressin
Medical follow-up contact 1–2 times/month
Titrate dose if necessary
No improvement
Clinical re-evaluation (including diary)
Confirmation of MNEChange treatment
Improvement
Continue desmopressin with regular re-evaluation
Dry for 3 months
Cease treatment(May try gradual
withdrawal)
Advise family to resume contact/treatment if relapse
Unsatisfactory improvement at 6–8 weeks
Combination alarm + desmopressin or refer to specialist
82 82 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
PK and PD characteristics (4) ! Clinical impression that spray was better than tablet ! And that melt might be superior to tablet
! Advice to take tablet two hours after meal and one hour before sleeping time is not realistic in younger children
! Pharmacodynamic study on antidiuretic effect of desmopressin melt / tablet in children in combination with meal
Desmopressin: clinical response melt / tablet
83 83 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
1. Ghent food study : superiority of melt versus tablet
• -
-‐U1-‐2-‐3-‐..: urinecollec1ons 1-‐2-‐3-‐..hours a5er desmopressin administra1on. Desmopressin MELT (white bars) compared to desmopressin tablet (striped bars). * = p<0.05; +
84 84 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Duration of Action (Urine Osmolality ≥ 200 mOsm/kg)
Duration of Action (Kaplan-Meier)
Time (h)
Pro
babi
lity
of C
ontin
ouos
Act
ion
0 2 4 6 8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 2 4 6 8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
MeltTablet
85 85 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
0
200
400
600
800
1000Melt
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Tablet
Time (h)
Urin
e O
smol
ality
Melt vs Tablet : Urine osmolality
86 86 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
0
200
400
600
800
1000Melt
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Tablet
Time (h)
Urin
e O
smol
ality
Melt vs Tablet :Urine osmolality
87 87 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Melt vs Tablet Pharmacokinetics
Values < LLOQ set to LLOQ/2 0
5
10
15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
MeltTablet
LLOQ/2
Time (h)
Des
mop
ress
in C
once
ntra
tion
(pg/
mL)Median (10th-90th percentiles)
88 88 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Long term follow up tablet / melt n= 23
89 89 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Why is melt superior to tablet ? ! Prefered by children Palat study ! Superior PharmacoKinetic –data
! Higher biodisponibility, Lower standard deviation ! More predictability
! Superior Pharmacodynamic data ! superior anti-diuretic effect ! Superior concentrating capacity ! Superior duration of action, Faster to reach max effect ! Less interference with nutrition
! Superior anti-enuretic effect ! Follow up study ! Confirmed in reanalysis
! No need for fluid to swallow tablet = safety ! Higher compliance?
90 90 © 2010 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Treatment Level of evidence Grade of
recommendation Pharmacological treatments Antidiuretics (desmopressin) 1 A
Desmopressin + alarm combination 1 A
Tricyclic antidepressants 1 C (cardiotoxicity)
Anticholinergics
3
C
Conditioning treatments Alarm 1 A Dry bed training No more effective than alarm treatment alone Arousal training 2 B
ICI Recommendations for the Treatment of Bedwetting
ICI, International Consultation on Incontinence. Nijman et al. In: Incontinence. 3rd InternConsultation on Incontinence. Abrams et al. 2005