EPC 690C-Graduate School CONNECTION Point
-
Upload
ryan-adams -
Category
Documents
-
view
26 -
download
0
Transcript of EPC 690C-Graduate School CONNECTION Point
Graduate School Connection Point
By Ryan AdamsEPC 690 C
April 29,2015
Overview
The bureau of labor statistics(2012) report students
with a disabilities who have a bachelor degree, only 28.4% are employed compared to graduates with no disabilities have an employment rate of 76.1%.
. The researchers at year four had found that students with non-apparent disabilities (SWND) had a lower graduation rate (11.96%) than compare to students without disabilities (SWOD) at (20.38%) (Wessel, et al., 2009).
SWND and SWAD disabilities had lower retentions rates, 38.04 % and 40.51 respectively, compared to SWOD rates at 45.08% (Wessel, et al., 2009).
Needs Statement
Tinto Retention Theory
Goal Commitment Institution commitments
Tinto (1988) believe that providing students with high expectations for success would provide increase retention.***
***by providing a graduate school workshop for students with disabilities, the department is encouraging the students to achieve long-term educational goals. ***
Student Development
Five Potential Obstacles
1. Advertising and Marketing that 24% of postsecondary institution reported that institution
main page follows established accessibility guidelines 2. Advocacy
proactive in protecting the rights of students with disabilities 20 % of the sites did not provide handicap parking and 25% of
the sites had no ramps and only 38% had both visual and audio alarms for emergency
3.Funding no longer eligible for federal and state funds which are
designated for undergraduate students (Belch, 1995). The institution should not make admission decisions based on
increase funding need to pay for interrupters or scribes
Accessibility-Graduate Admissions
Five Potential Obstacles
4. Mentoring- Maddus (2006) Students with disabilities had greater success
when they had a peer mentor or mentor during their college experience
5. Training- the graduate offices should incorporating
training for their faculty so they are better equipped for students with a disability.
Accessibility-Graduate Admissions
Transition Process- Getzel and Thoma (2008)
Evaluated the TWO(2) and Four (4) year process of transition for students with disabilities
4 Characteristics to Increase Retention 1. Ability to problem solving- Alt. Solutions 2. Self-Awareness 3. Goal Setting 4. Self-Management
Overall Result indicate students with disabilities need to complete their education
Educational Outcomes
Evaluating positive outcomes in Higher Ed (Garrison-Wade, 2012).
a qualitative study which had the intention to explore student perceptions and develop a clear understanding on what contributes to positive outcomes in postsecondary education.
Results: Three Themes-Positive Academic Outcomes (Garrison-Wade, 2012)
1. Capitalizing on student self-determination skills Low expectations w/ lack of understanding regarding their disability. Find own motivation
2. Implementing formalized planning process establish clear boundaries and future steps relating to career or educational
goals 3. Improving postsecondary support
support had ranged from finding mentors on campus or receiving financial assistance
Educational Outcomes Cont.
Overall research supports the finding that to
increase positive outcomes with students with disabilities they need to establish clear educational goals
Graduate admission process is shown to having accessibility issues for potential graduate students with disabilities (Belch, 1996). Therefore, by conducting the workshop we may provide the marketing and information that limited access to students with disabilities.
Conclusion
Program Implementation
Graduate School Connection Point
Institution: California State University, Northridge(CSUN) Department: Disability Resources and Educational Services(DRES) Program: Thriving and Achieving Program Academic Coaching
Intervention One (1) hour long workshop on attending graduate school
How to apply, funding, types of graduate schools Facilitated by 3 graduate students
Mission State-DRES “Futher the vision of an inclusive society that supports the
attainment of academic… goals…”
Proposal
Probable characteristics
DRES students the students in attendance will identify with a permanent or temporary
disability
Thriving and Achieving Program (TAP) students First year students (e.g. freshman or transfer students).
Model of Marketing Webpage, handouts, word of mouth
Timeline Marketing-February 10th -March 23rd 2015. Intervention- March 24th, 2015 11am- 12pm Data Analysis- April 1st-April 15th 2015
Potential Demographics
1. Students will be able to identify 3 financial
funding options for graduate school.
2. Students will be able identify 2 benefits attending graduate school.
3. student will be able to learn 3 types of graduate school programs.
4. Students will able to identify 2 expense of graduate school programs.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLO’s)
Quantitative approach
benchmarking students to measure the level of understanding about the topic of graduate school.
Demographic Information Collected: age, gender, major class standing.
PRE-SURVEY Questions: Closed Ended-SLO;s
POST-SURVERY Questions: Closed Ended SLO’S, Likert and Open Ended
The participants will answer in four areas of knowledge pertaining to graduate school: (a) types of graduate school (b) benefits of graduate school (c) financial funding (d) cost..
Methodology
Demographic Data
Demographics
Average
Mode
Median
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
28.31
26
24
AGE BREAKDOWN
Demographic
7.69%
53.85%
23.08%
15.38%FreshmanJuniorSeniorDeclined to state
CLASS LEVEL
Demographic
38.46%
61.54% MalesFemales
GENDER
Demographics
53.85%
23.08%
7.69%
7.69%PsychologyComputer ScienceArt-AminationKinesology
MAJORS
Results
Results
0 Correct Answers
1 Correct Answers
2 Correct Answers
3 Correct Answers
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
53.85%
15.38% 7.69%
23.08%
7.69% 7.69%
15.38%
69.23%
Pre-TestPost-Test
Question 1: What are the three funding sources for graduate school?
Results
0 Correct Answers
1 Correct Answers
2 Correct Answers
3 Correct Answers
0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%
100.00% 92%
0%8%
0%
53.85%
7.69%
30.77%
7.69%
Pre-TestPost-Test
Question 2: What are the three different types of graduate schools?
Results
0 Correct Answers
1 Correct Answers
2 Correct Answers
3 Correct Answers
0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%
69.23%
7.69%
23.08%
0.00%
30.77%
7.69%
61.54%
0.00%
Pre-TestPost-Test
Question 3: What are the three different types of expenses related to graduate school?
Results
0 Correct Answers 1 Correct Answers 2 Correct Answers0.00%
10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00% 61.54%
38.46%
0.00%
7.69%
30.77%
61.54%
Pre-TestPost-Test
Question 4: What are the two benefits of attending graduate school?
Results-Post Survey
61.54%
38.46%Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither Agree or DisagreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Question 5: For the following question please respond the following statement: I would recommend this workshop
Results-Post Survey
8% 15%
23%
54%
Score-0
Score-1
Score-2
Score-3
Score- 4
Score- 5
Question 6: On a scale from 0-5 (5 being the highest), did you interact and/or connect with other students and peers in the workshop?
Analysis
Question 1 Students who had answered three or two correct answers was calculated at 84.61%.
As a result, the information can assume that students had increasing their learning about funding options for graduate schools
Question 2 Students who had answered three or two correct answers was calculated at 38.46%. 53.85% of the participants had no corrects answer. However this is an 38.46% decrease from zero correct answer.
Therefore through the results, students had demonstrated increasing learning about types of graduate schools.
Question 3 38.46% increase in 2 corrected answers Overall students had minimal increasing in retaining information .
Therefore, students had learned ineffectively of the cost of graduate school and the workshop may need improvement in this learning outcome.
Question 4 61.54% of students had 2 correct answers 30.77% of students had answered 1 correctly. Only 7.69% of students had no correct answers.
As a result, students had demonstrated learning in benefits of attending graduate school.
Analysis
Incorrect labeling on Slides
Double sided surveys
Small sample population-14 students
Post survey- Double Barrel Question
Limitations
Strengths of Intervention
Identifying three sources of funding Student satisfaction
Areas of Improvement-Student Recommendations Increase social interaction
“The workshop is great the only thing I can think of to improve the workshop would be more interactive activities”
“To interact with more people”
Recommendation
Improvements
Clearly label slides “Didn't see the answers for these questions on
the powerpoint.” Single sided assessment Write instructions on assessment
Lessons Learned Collaboration with co-facilitators is important Clarity is need when teaching specific
information
Reflections
References
Belch, H. (1995). Admitting graduate students with disabilities. New Directions for Student
Services,1995(72), 101-110. Garrison-Wade, D. (2012). Listening to their voices: Factors that inhibit or enhance postsecondary
outcomes for students' with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 1. Getzel, E. , & Thoma, C. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of
self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,31(2), 77-84.
Madaus, J. W. (2006). Improving the transition to career for college students with learning disabilities: Suggestions from graduates. Journal Of Postsecondary Education And Disability, 19(1), 85-93.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Students with disabilities at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: First look. NCES 2011-018. National Center For Education Statistics.
Olkin, R. (2002). Could you hold the door for me? Including disability in diversity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2), 130.
Salmon, N., & Kinnealey, M. (2007). Paving rough roads: Transition to life beyond the classroom as experienced by students with disabilities and their families. Exceptionality Education Canada, 17(1), 53-84.
U.S. Census Bureau (2012) Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0285.pdf
Wessel, R. D., Jones, J. A., Markle, L., & Westfall, C. (2009). Retention and graduation of students with disabilities: Facilitating student success. Journal Of Postsecondary Education And Disability, 21(3), 116-125.
Tinto, V. (1988). Stages of student departure: Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. The Journal of Higher Education, 438-455.
References
Appendix
Appendix A
Appendix B