EPA DROE Email 6.23.03 (b)

2
ARMS zj& ~~Page 1 of 2 RECORD TYPE: FEDERAL (NOTES NAIL) CREATOR:Khary I. Cauthen ( CN=Khary I. Cauthen/OU=CEQ/O=EOP CEQ CREATION DATE/TIME:23-JUN-2003 10:20:58.00 SUBJECT:: Fw: Miami Herald EDITORIAL (6/23/03) Ye: Spinning the Environment TO:terry.carl~epa~gov @ mnet ( terry.carl~epa.gov @ mnet [ UNKNOWN READ: UNKNOWN TEXT: Carl, could you give me a call when you get a chance? 202-456-6224 Lisa Harrison has the State of the Environment announcement at noon, so we're thinking of doing a quick stratect meeting editorial .... ~ ~ ~ and how t~oaddTress this- Thanks Khary …-----------Forwarded by Khary I. Cauthen/CEQ/EOP on 06/23/2003 10:17 AM -- - - - - - - - - - - - - Posted on Non, Jun. 23, 2003 SPINNING THE ENVIRONMENT WHITE HOUSE TINKERS WITH EPA REPORT Miami Heald EDITORIAL When it comes to providing information to the public, the Bush administration is developing a decidedly mixed record. Nowhere does this tendency emerge more often than when the subject is energy policy. White House officials seem inclined to be forthcoming only selectively. That's apparently what happened to the Environmental Protection Agency's comprehensive report on the state of the environment. The report became less comprehensive after White House editing of a section on global warming, according to information from EPA officials. The EPA's take on global warming is based on scientific studies that warn of risks to public health and the environment from such pollution sources as auto and factory emissions, early drafts of the report show. The edited version instead will offer a view more popular with the energy industry: Global warming is only a theory; the Earth is a complex place with many natural variables that could be causing temperatures to rise. That, indeed, is part of what's happening in Nature, where, over much time, changing conditions have brought on both ice ages and steamy jungle conditions in different eras. But scientific studies by federal agencies, beginning with NASA, also have found profound effects on the Earth's atmosphere from rising levels of air pollution. However, the public will have to search somewhere other than the current version of the EPA report to learn the whole story. The first example of the administration's reticence in this area occurred file://D:\SEARCH_7_9_03_CEQ1\2l6_f uiifho3_ceq.txt 8/15/2003

Transcript of EPA DROE Email 6.23.03 (b)

ARMS zj& ~~Page 1 of 2

RECORD TYPE: FEDERAL (NOTES NAIL)

CREATOR:Khary I. Cauthen ( CN=Khary I. Cauthen/OU=CEQ/O=EOP CEQ

CREATION DATE/TIME:23-JUN-2003 10:20:58.00

SUBJECT:: Fw: Miami Herald EDITORIAL (6/23/03) Ye: Spinning the Environment

TO:terry.carl~epa~gov @ mnet ( terry.carl~epa.gov @ mnet [ UNKNOWNREAD: UNKNOWN

TEXT:Carl, could you give me a call when you get a chance? 202-456-6224Lisa Harrison has the State of the Environment announcement at noon, sowe're thinking of doing a quick stratect meeting

editorial .... ~ ~ ~ and how t~oaddTress this-

ThanksKhary

…-----------Forwarded by Khary I. Cauthen/CEQ/EOP on 06/23/200310:17 AM -- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Posted on Non, Jun. 23, 2003

SPINNING THE ENVIRONMENTWHITE HOUSE TINKERS WITH EPA REPORTMiami HealdEDITORIAL

When it comes to providing information to the public, the Bushadministration is developing a decidedly mixed record. Nowhere does thistendency emerge more often than when the subject is energy policy. WhiteHouse officials seem inclined to be forthcoming only selectively. That'sapparently what happened to the Environmental Protection Agency'scomprehensive report on the state of the environment. The report becameless comprehensive after White House editing of a section on globalwarming, according to information from EPA officials.The EPA's take on global warming is based on scientific studies that warnof risks to public health and the environment from such pollution sourcesas auto and factory emissions, early drafts of the report show. The editedversion instead will offer a view more popular with the energy industry:Global warming is only a theory; the Earth is a complex place with manynatural variables that could be causing temperatures to rise.That, indeed, is part of what's happening in Nature, where, over muchtime, changing conditions have brought on both ice ages and steamy jungleconditions in different eras. But scientific studies by federal agencies,beginning with NASA, also have found profound effects on the Earth'satmosphere from rising levels of air pollution. However, the public willhave to search somewhere other than the current version of the EPA reportto learn the whole story.The first example of the administration's reticence in this area occurred

file://D:\SEARCH_7_9_03_CEQ1\2l6_f uiifho3_ceq.txt 8/15/2003

Page 2 of 2

when Vice President flick Cheney balked at revealing the people and what

entities they represented who helped him craft the administration's energy

strategy two years ago. Environmental groups say they only know who Mr.

Cheney didn't speak with: their representatives. This may help to explain

why U.S. energy strategy is based so heavily on increased oil and

natural-gas production and less so on conservation and research and

development of alternative energy sources. This national policy affects us

all, and Americans have the right to know who helped shape it.

Such selectivity on when to tell and when not to tell ill serves the Bush

administration and the American people. Tt also hinders affected

government agencies, which are supposed to be impartial. The EPA is the

people's advisor and regulator on environmental and health issues. Its

judgments must be based on facts, science and objective analysis, not

political spin.

file://D:\SEARCH_7_9_O3-CEQ_1\2 1 6f-ujfh0O3_ceq~txt 8/15/2003