Environment_Parallel Session_Jo Rowena Garcia

7/31/2019 Environment_Parallel Session_Jo Rowena Garcia

1/26

pp ne nv ronmen a a eguar s ys empp ne nv ronmen a a eguar s ys emImplementation Assessment (PESSIA)Implementation Assessment (PESSIA)

Environment and Safe uards Division

Regional and Sustainable Development Department

Asian Development Bank

Country Safeguard Systems Regional Workshop:

Towards Common Approaches and Better Results

18 April 2012

The views in this presentation are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian DevelopmentBank (ADB), or its Board of Governors, or the government they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included

in this presentation and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily beconsistent with ADB official terms.


2/26

Presentation OutlinePresentation OutlineA. Rationale

B. BackgroundC. Stud Covera e

D. Target Outcome

.

F. Study Methodology & Key Activities

G. Study Challenges & Team Response


3/26

A. Study RationaleA. Study Rationale

An ADB SPS 2009 Ob ective :

help strengthen CSS and developborrower/client capacity to manageenvironmental and social risks

identified to conduct a structured Countryf r R vi w R f r r n h nin

and potential use of CSS.

3


4/26

B. PESSIA BackgroundB. PESSIA Background

2003 -2005 WB Studies on Strengthening ofPollution Control and EIS Monitoring

& Evaluation2006-2007 Joint WB-ADB PEISS Discussion

Paper

2009 -2010 WB SDR of PEISS per OP 4.00(Piloting Use of Borrower Systems )

2010 ADB Draft Equivalence Assessment

2011 ADB Philippine EnvironmentalSafe uards S stems Im lementation

4

Assessment (ongoing)


5/26

C1. PESSIA Study CoverageC1. PESSIA Study Coverage

ADB EnvironmentalSafeguard Policy Areas

CorrespondingPhi lippine Legislat ion

PhilippineLead Agencies

-

Assessment

,

Biodiversity & natural PD 705, RA 7586, RA DENR, 2- DA, 3-resource conservation 9147, PD 1067 NWRB

Pollution prevention & PD 984, RA 6969, RA DENR, 4- LGUcontrol 9003, RA 8749, RA 9275,

RA 7160

Occu ational & PD 442 PD 856 5- DOLE 6-

Community health &safety

DOH

- -resource conservation

8371

,NHCP, 9- NCIP


6/26

C2. Stakeholder Coverage of the PESSIAC2. Stakeholder Coverage of the PESSIA

in relation to Regulated Projectsin relation to Regulated ProjectsLead Development Lead Environmental

f r A n i,

LocalPro ect Pro onents

EIS Preparers Government UnitRegulated

Pro ects

Project-AffectedCommunities

EIS ReviewCommittee

Other Key StakeholdersIndustr Associations Academe Envitl

Next

NGO, Church, Media, Legal NGO/Courts


7/26

Percent Distribution of EstablishmentsPercent Distribution of Establishmentsby Employment Size (2005), DOLEby Employment Size (2005), DOLE

Menu

Total Establishments = 782,980


8/26

11 Im l m n i n Tr k R rIm l m n i n Tr k R r

(across regulated projects, over time)(across regulated projects, over time)

n rn r

Outcomes achievedOutcomes achieved

2)2) Institutional ResourcesInstitutional Resources


9/26

D. Study Target OutcomeD. Study Target Outcome

Shared understanding and recognition :

implementation of the Philippine Environmental

b) of the action plans developed in coordination

n r f r iv ff iv l achieved and sustained

9


10/26

1. R r n h PE IA in l in n

inter-agency Action Plan towardsim r vin im l m n i neffectiveness based on PESS own

le al re uirements

2. Recommendations for Improvement

strengthening and use of CSS

10


11/26

F1. Study Methodology:F1. Study Methodology:

1. System Concept and Design

..

(Input Policy Directions & Legal Requirements)

Count ry

Safeguard

2. System

Construction

. ys emReview &

*ys tem (Input Resources)(Corrective Actions,

Initiatives)

3. System Operation *

* PESSIA Focus of Analysis


12/26

2. IPOO View of a Country Safeguards System2. IPOO View of a Country Safeguards System

PROCESS * OUTPUT * OUTCOME*INPUT

Management

Directions Profile of the

Regulated Projects

Project Regulatory

Deliverables

Re ort Objective ofRequirements

Procedures Stakeholders

delivering

requirements

CertificationLicense

A reement

the safeguardrequirement

Resourceshuman, physical,

stage FacilitiesFinancial

, ,tools

* PESSIA Focus of Analysis


13/26

F2. Key Activities

ev ew o comp ete assessment stu es

2 Desk Review of agency and stakeholder performance at,

3 Desk Review of Project Case Studies

5 Interviews with Agencies/Stakeholders

,Action Planning by Study Team

7 Draft Report (PESSIA & CSR Methodology):

Review and Clearance8 Multi-Stakeholder Consultation/Workshop on Action

9 Final Reports (PESSIA & CSR Methodology):Review, Clearance and Disclosure

Next to 22


14/26

Project Case Studies

Dev Sectors DENR-EMB EIA Types Project TypeProcessing

Office

Energy CO/ R3

R4B

EIS/ IEER

IEEC

Power Plant, LPG Depot,

Mini-Hydro

Agriculture R3/

R4B

IEER/

EPRMP

,Piggery Exp,

Piggery ExpInfrastructure CO

R3/EIS/EIS/

Sewerage,Water Prodn, Storage &

R4B IEER

Municipal Waterworks

Transport CO/ EIS/ Railway Transit,R3

R4B

IEEC

IEEC

Bridge Construction,

Port Terminal BldgMenu Next


15/26

Case Studies on Resolution of Environmental

-Adjudication and Court Cases

a. EIS System Admin investigation

b. Pollution Adjudication Board (PAB) cases

c. Resource use cases (i.e. water rights,

d. Occupational health and/or safety case

e. Physical cultural property case

Menu Next


16/26

Screenshot of the normalized binary scoring spreadsheet 1

Binary scores

Next


17/26

Screenshot of the normalized binary scoring spreadsheet 2

Normalized scores

- Cases (x)

- Procedure (y)

MenuNext


18/26

Qualitative Metrics to Convert Normalized Scores

The normalized score (Sn) will be used for the evaluation of aprocedure or criterion. The Snwill be converted to qualitative

Ratio Score AssessmentMetric

Description

0.90 1.0 A Excellent: relevant tasks well

performed0.75 0.89 B Satisfactory: pertinent tasks were

performed but needs improvement

0.60 0.74 C Poor: inadequate efforts

0 0.59 D Failed: tasks not done

Lee & Colley (1992) with some modifications

Menu


19/26

Matrix of AnalysisMatrix of Analysis

Safeguard Area

(Final PESSIA Report)

Safeguard

Agency (report)

Development

Agency

Stakeholder X

IPOO IPOO IPOO

Biodiversity andNatural Resources

IPOO IPOO IPOO

Pollution

prevention &

IPOO IPOO IPOO

control

Occupational and IPOO IPOO IPOO

& safety

Physical cultural IPOO IPOO IPOO

property

conservation


20/26

A enc Re ort OutlineA enc Re ort Outline1.1. OverviewOverview ofof thethe AgencyAgency

--

3.3. AgencyAgency PlansPlans andand ProgramsPrograms inin RegulatingRegulating DevelopmentDevelopment ProjectsProjects4.4. DescriptionDescription ofof AgencyAgency--coveredcovered RegulatedRegulated ProjectsProjects

..

6.6. OverviewOverview ofof AgencyAgency InstitutionalInstitutional ResourcesResources

7.7. AgencyAgency ImplementationImplementation ofof EnvironmentalEnvironmental SafeguardSafeguard8.8. RecordRecord ofof AccomplishmentsAccomplishments inin RegulatingRegulating DevelopmentDevelopment ProjectsProjects

9.9. RecordRecord ofof ProjectProject ss EnvironmentalEnvironmental PerformancePerformance

10.10. RecordRecord ofof BestBest PracticesPractices ofof thethe A encA enc andand Re ulatedRe ulated Pro ectsPro ects Be ondBe ond

RegulationsRegulations11.11. OnOn--goinggoing InstitutionalInstitutional StrengtheningStrengthening InitiativesInitiatives

..

Back to Matrix


21/26

PESSIA Report OutlinePESSIA Report Outline

Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryI.I. IntroductionIntroductionII.II. MethodologyMethodology

a. Overall approacha. Overall approachb. Description of theb. Description of the PPhilippinehilippine EEnvironmental Safeguards Systemnvironmental Safeguards System

c. Sco in of the studc. Sco in of the studd. Development of data forms for assessment and action pland. Development of data forms for assessment and action plane. Data gatheringe. Data gathering

..IV.IV. Assessment of Philippine Environmental Impact Statement SystemAssessment of Philippine Environmental Impact Statement SystemV.V. IImplementation Assessment of Pollutionmplementation Assessment of Pollution PPrevention Safeguardsrevention Safeguards

.. mp emen a on ssessmen o o vers ymp emen a on ssessmen o o vers y onserva on an a uraonserva on an a uraRResourceesource MManagementanagement

VII.VII. Implementation Assessment of Health and SafetyImplementation Assessment of Health and Safety SSafeguardsafeguardsVIII.VIII. Implementation Assessment of Conservation of PhysicalImplementation Assessment of Conservation of Physical CCulturalultural

Resources and ChanceResources and Chance FFinds"inds"IX. Summary ofIX. Summary of SSignificant Findingsignificant Findings21

Menu


22/26

G. Study Challenges & ResponseG. Study Challenges & Response

Challenges Response

1 Need to build Invitations letters to

early ownershipof all participate sent andkick-off meetings donestakeholders ofthe Country

with heads of agencies;

Requested for agency

Reviewcoordinators;

Inclusive/Consultative

approach adopted

Receptive tosuggestions


23/26

G. Study Challenges & ResponseG. Study Challenges & Response

Challenges Response

2 Data availability Pro-active data

and accessibility gathering

of activities

3 Need for flexiblestudy timeline

Regular team meetingsto review study focus

information, lack ofcontinuity, and other Regular contact withuncontrolled

variables)

stakeholders


24/26

Challenges Response

4 How to doobjective

Normalized binary scoring

minimizes bias

assessment(case studies) allows two dimensional

analysis of variables

allows comparison of a

procedure across cases with

allows ranking

au oma es e caseevaluation


25/26

Challenges Response

5 Concern on follow-through on action plans Sustainability

Commitments affected bychanging leadership & addressed in the

action lannin

Stakeholders concern on

For IFIs toava a y oresources (human,technical and financial) to

respond

sustain implementationof the action plans


26/26

Thank you!Thank you!

Acknow ledgements t o t he PESSI A Study TeamJo Rowena D. Lead Environmental Safe uardsGarcia

Specialist

Vanderleaf C. Environment Safeguards SpecialistCapa ungan

Jethro Alden C. Environment Assessment Specialist

Helen B. Cruda Environment Specialist, ADB

Harve Himber ADB CSS Consultant

Environment_Parallel Session_Jo Rowena Garcia

Documents

Transcript of Environment_Parallel Session_Jo Rowena Garcia