ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) REPORT...
Transcript of ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) REPORT...
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED EXPANSION
AND MODIFICATION OF THE ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL
INGREDIENTS (API’S) AND INTERMEDIATES MANUFACTURING
INDUSTRY WITH R & D ACTIVITY.
At
Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur,
Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road,
Chicksugur, Raichur Dist - 584134.
Project Proponents
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited.,
100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II,
Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur,
Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road,
Chicksugur – 584134.
Environmental Consultants
M/s. SAMRAKSHAN
F- 4, I Floor, Swastik Manandi Arcade,
S C Road, Sheshadripuram,
Bangalore - 560 020.
Ph. : 080-41466009
E mail id – [email protected],
(December 2016 to February 2017)
ii
CONTENTS
Sl. No. Description Pg. No
FORM -1 1-15
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-23
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.0 Purpose Of The Report 24
1.1 Identification Of The Project & Project Proponent 25
1.1.1 Introduction To The Project Proponent 25
1.1.2 Introduction To The Project 28
1.2 Brief Description Of Nature, Size, Location Of The Project & Its Importance To The Country, Region
28
1.2.1 Nature, Size & Location Of The Project 28
1.2.2 Need For The Project And Its Importance To The Country And/Region
32
1.2.3 Demand Supply Gap, Imports Vs Indigenous Production 33
1.2.4 Export Possibility 33
1.3 Scope Of Study – Details Of Regulatory Scoping Carried Out (As Per Terms Of Reference)
34
1.3.1 Scope Of Study 34
1.3.2 Components Of EIA Report 34
1.3.3 Terms Of Reference (ToR) 35
1.4 Generic Structure Of EIA Document: 50
CHAPTER 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 Type Of Project 52
2.2 Need For The Project 52
2.3 Location Of The Proposed Industry 52
2.4 Size Or Magnitude Of Operation 54
2.5 Proposed Schedule For Approval & Implementation 55
2.6 Proposed Layout Plan 55
2.7 Technology & Process Description 59
2.7.1 Products Manufactured 59
2.7.2 Detailed Manufacturing Process Description 61
2.7.3 Resource Optimization/Recycling And Re-Use Envisaged In The Industry
72
2.7.3.1 Solvent Recovery & Re-Use 72
iii
2.7.3.2 Storage Of Solvents 77
2.7.4 Raw Materials Required 81
2.7.4.1 Quantity Requirement 81
2.7.4.2 Source Of Supply Of Raw Materials & Marketing Area Of Final Products
100
2.7.4.2.1 Raw Materials Suppliers 100
2.7.4.3 Storage Facility For Raw Materials And Products 105
2.7.5 Machinery & Equipment Details 106
2.8 Project Description Including Drawings Showing Project Layout, Components Of Project, Schematic Representations Of The Feasibility Drawing Giving Information Important For EIA Purpose
127
2.8.1 Project Description Including Drawings Showing Project Layout, Components Of Project
127
2.8.2 Schematic Representations Of The Feasibility Drawing 128
2.9 Mitigation Measures Incorporated Into The Project To Meet Environmental Standards, Environmental Operating Conditions Or Other EIA Requirements (As Required By The Scope)
129
2.9.1 Water Demand And Wastewater/Effluent Discharge 129
2.9.1.1 Source Of Water Supply 129
2.9.1.2 Water Demand And Wastewater Discharge During Operation Phase
129
2.9.2 Product-Wise Water Consumption And Discharge 133
2.9.2. (A) Raw Material To Product And Product To Waste Generation Ratio For Each Product
139
2.9.2.1 Process Effluent Characteristics 142
2.9.2.2 Storage Facilities Provided For Industrial Effluents 142
2.9.2.3 Treatment Scheme For Wastewater 143
2.9.2.4 ETP Details: 146
2.9.3 Air Pollution Sources 149
2.9.3.1 Power 149
2.9.3.2 Air Pollution Sources 149
2.9.3.3 Noise Generation And Its Management 157
2.9.3.4 Solid Waste Generation And Management 157
2.9.3.5 Hazardous Raw Materials Used In The Manufacturing Process And Hazardous Waste Generation And Management
158
2.9.3.5.1 Hazardous Raw Materials 158
2.9.3.5.2 Hazardous Waste Generation And Management 159
2.9.3.5.3 Storage Facilities For Hazardous Waste 174
iv
2.9.4 Rainwater Harvesting & Groundwater Recharging 175
2.10 Assessment Of New & Untested Technology For The Risk Of Technological Failure
176
CHAPTER 3
DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
3.1 Study Area, Period, Components & Methodology 177
3.2 Establishment Of Baseline 179
3.2.1 Meteorological Data 179
3.2.2 Temperature 181
3.2.3 Relative Humidity 181
3.2.4 Rainfall 181
3.2.5 Atmospheric Pressure 181
3.2.6 Wind 182
3.2.7 Inversion Height 187
3.2.8 Cloud Cover 187
3.3 Baseline Monitoring 187
3.3.1 Sampling And Analytical Techniques 187
3.3.2 Air Quality 190
3.3.2.1 Air Quality At All Location: 193
3.3.2.2 Observations 195
3.3.3 Noise Environment 195
3.3.3.1 Observations 197
3.3.4 Water Environment 197
3.3.4.1 Reconnaissance Survey 197
3.3.4.2 Surface Water 198
3.3.4.3 Ground Water 202
3.3.4.4 Observations 206
3.3.5 Soil And Geology 206
3.4 Ecology 209
3.4.1 Anticipated Impacts 209
3.4.2 Flora 210
3.4.3 Fauna 211
3.5 Socio-Economic Environment 212
3.6 Demographic Structure 213
3.6.1 Social Infrastructure Available 214
3.7 Connectivity 215
3.8 Base Maps Of All Environmental Components 220
v
CHAPTER 4
ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
4.1 Details Of Investigated Environmental Impacts Due To Project Location, Possible Accidents, Project Design, Project Construction, Regular Operations, Final Decommissioning Or Rehabilitation Of Completed Project
222
4.1.1 Environmental Impacts Due To Project Location, Possible Accidents, Project Design
222
4.1.2 Environmental Impacts Due To Project Construction, Regular Operations
224
4.2 Actions Likely To Affect The Environment 224
4.2.1 Air Environment 225
4.2.1.2 Air Environment 225
4.2.1.2.1 Construction Phase 225
4.2.1.2.2 Operation Phase 225
4.2.2 Noise Environment 225
4.2.2.1 Construction Phase 225
4.2.2.2 Operation Phase 225
4.2.3 Water Environment 225
4.2.3.1 Construction Phase 225
4.2.3.2 Operation Phase 226
4.2.4 Land And Biological Environment 226
4.2.4.1 Construction Phase 226
4.2.4.1 Operation Phase 226
4.2.5 Socio-Economic Environment 227
4.2.5.1 Operation Phase 227
4.3 Measures For Minimizing & / Or Offsetting Adverse Impacts Identified & Mitigation Measures – Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
227
4.3.1 Introduction 227
4.3.2 Scope Of EMP 227
4.3.3 EMP During Construction Phase 228
4.3.3.1 Air Environment 228
4.3.3.2 Noise Environment 228
4.3.3.3 Water Environment 228
4.3.3.4 Land Environment 229
4.3.3.5 Management Measures For Flora And Fauna 229
4.3.3.6 Socio-Economic Environment 229
vi
4.3.4 EMP During Operation Phase 229
4.3.4.1 Air Environment 229
4.3.4.2 Noise Environment 231
4.3.4.3 Traffic Density And Its Impact 231
4.3.4.4 Water Consumption And Wastewater Treatment And Disposal Details
231
4.3.4.5 Land Environment 232
4.3.5 EMP Implementation Schedule 233
4.4 Irreversible & Irretrievable Commitments Of Environmental Components
234
4.5 Assessment Of Significance Of Impacts (Criteria For Determining Significance, Assigning Significance)
234
4.5.1 Impact Matrix 234
4.5.2 Environmental Impact Assessment 236
CHAPTER 5
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (TECHNOLOGY & SITE)
5.1 Alternatives For Technology 240
5.1.1 Emission Control Techniques 240
5.1.2 Oxides Of Nitrogen Emissions From Boiler 241
5.2 Alternatives For Site 243
CHAPTER 6
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME
6.1 Technical Aspects Of Monitoring The Effectiveness Of
Mitigation Measures (Including Measurement
Methodologies, Frequency, Location, Data Analysis,
Reporting Schedules, Emergency Procedures, Detailed
Budget & Procurement Schedules)
244
6.1.1 Measurement Methodology 244
6.1.2 Frequency, Location, Data Analysis, Reporting Schedules 244
6.1.3 Emergency Procedures 245
6.1.4 Detailed Budget & Procurement Schedules 247
CHAPTER 7
ADDITIONAL STUDIES
7.1 Introduction 248
7.2 HAZOP Analysis 248
7.3 Safety Precautions For The Handling Of Hydrogen Gas And
PD/Carbon
249
vii
7.4 Risk Assessment 250
7.4.1 Background 250
7.4.2 Introduction 250
7.4.3 Objective & Scope 250
7.4.4 Hazard Identification 251
7.4.4.1 Exposure To Solvents 253
7.4.4.5.1 Fire & Explosing Index 260
7.4.5 Fire Hazards 268
7.4.5.1 Introduction To The Fire & Explosion Index (F & EI) 268
7.4.5.2 Procedure For Risk Analysis Calculations 269
7.4.5.3 Important Considerations 269
7.4.5.4 Calculation Of F & EI For The Storage Area Of
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
270
7.4.6 Maximum Credible Accident (MCA) Analysis 271
7.4.6.1 Fire Damage 271
7.4.6.2 Properties Of Solvents/Fuels 273
7.4.7 Salient Features Of Risk Auditing And Assessment 274
7.4.7.1 Fire Protection 275
7.4.7.2 OHS (Occupational Health And Safety) 276
7.4.7.3 ER (Electrical Risk) 276
7.4.8 Process Safety Management 276
7.4.9 Electrical Risk Assessment 276
7.4.10 Fire Risk Assessment 277
7.4.11 Risk Analysis & Emergency Plan 277
7.4.12 Risk Management & Insurance Planning 277
7.4.13 Risk Management Training 278
7.4.14 General Guidelines To Be Adopted By The Unit For Minimizing Associated Risks At M/S. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
278
7.4.15 Accident Reporting 279
7.4.15.1 Introduction 279
7.4.15.2 Action To Be Taken In The Event Of An Accident/Incident 280
7.4.15.3 Reports To Be Generated In The Event Of Accidents 280
7.4.15.4 The Reporting Of Injuries, Diseases And Dangerous
Occurrences Regulations
280
7.4.15.5 Responsibilities 281
7.4.15.6 Incident/Accident Reporting And Investigation Flow Chart 283
viii
For Work-Related Accidents/Incident And Near Misses
7.5 Air Pollution Dispersion Modeling Studies 284
7.5.1 Introduction 284
7.5.2 Model Input Data 284
7.5.3 Meteorological Data 285
7.5.4 Presentation Of Results 285
7.5.5 Comments 302
7.6 Public Consultation 303
7.7 Social Impact Assessment, R&R Action Plans 304
CHAPTER 8
PROJECT BENEFITS
8.1 Improvements In The Physical Infrastructure, Social
Infrastructure
305
8.2 Tangible Benefits 305
8.3 Intangible Benefits 306
CHAPTER 9
ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
9.1 Introduction 307
9.2 Uses Of CBA 307
9.3 Main Stages 308
9.4 Disadvantages 309
9.5 Discounting The Future 310
9.6 Cost-Benefit Analysis For M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited.,
100% Export Oriented Unit,
311
CHAPTER 10
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)
10.1 Introduction 313
10.2 Mitigation Measures 314
10.3 Environmental Management Plan (EMP) 315
10.4 Environmental Policy 321
10.5 Description Of The Administrative Aspects Of Ensuring That
Mitigative Measures Are Implemented & Their Effectiveness
Monitored, After Approval, Implementation And During
Operation
322
10.5.1 Environment Management Cell
322
ix
CHAPTER 11
SUMMARY & CONCLUSION
11.1 Overall Justification For Implementation Of The Project 324
11..2 Explanation Of How Adverse Effects Have Been Mitigated 325
CHAPTER 12
DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED
12.1 The Names Of The Consultants Engaged With Their Brief
Resume & Nature Of Consultancy Rendered
327
x
LIST OF TABLES
Table no.
Description Pg. No
1.0 Existing Products 30
1.1 The API’s & Intermediates Proposed To Be Manufactured 30
1.1 Terms Of Reference (Tor) 35
2.0 Co-Ordinates (Lat-Long) Of All Four Corners Of The Site 53
2.1 Total Cost Of The Project 55
2.2 Time Schedule For Completion Of The Proposed 55
2.3 Land-Use Pattern 55
2.4 List Of Surrounding Major Industries 56
2.5 Existing Products 59
2.6 API’s And Intermediates Are Proposed To Be Manufactured 59
2.7 Solvent Recovery 72
2.8 Quantity Of By-Products Generated In Kg 80
2.9 Raw Materials Requirement 81
2.10 Raw Material Suppliers 100
2.11 Details Of Storage Facilities 105
2.12 List Of The Machinery & Equipments 106
2.13 Water Consumption And Discharge 130
2.14 Sewage/Effluent Treatment And Discharge 131
2.15 Product-Wise Water Consumption And Effluent Discharge 133
2.15.A Raw Materials To Waste & Product To Waste Generation Ratio & Percentage
139
2.16 Effluent Characteristics For The Emerging Scenario 142
2.17 Air Pollution Sources, Fuel Consumption And Chimney Height
Details
150
2.18 Solid Waste Generation 158
2.19 Hazardous Raw Materials 158
2.20 Quantity Of Organic Process Residue Generation From Manufacturing Process.
160
2.22 Details Of Spent Carbon 163
2.22 Inorganic Salt Generation From The Process 166
2.23 Quantity Of Spent Catalyst Generation From Manufacturing Process 169
2.24 Summary Of The Total Quantity Of Hazardous Wastes: 171
2.25 Characteristics Of Hazardous Waste 172
xi
2.26 Storage Facilities For Hazardous Waste 174
2.27 Disposal Facilities For Hazardous Waste 174
3.1 Meteorological Data Of Bangalore For The Year 2016 180
3.2 Techniques Adopted/Protocols For Ambient Air Quality Monitoring 188
3.3 Protocol For Surface Water Quality Monitoring 188
3.4 Protocol For Ground Water Quality Monitoring 189
3.5 Equipments Used For Noise & Soil Monitoring 190
3.6 Ambient Air Sampling Stations 191
3.7 Air Quality Data Analysis Results 193
3.8 Table 3.8: Ambient Air Quality Standards – MoEF As Per The
Notification Dated 16th November 2009 For Industrial, Residential
& Rural Areas
194
3.9 Noise Level Monitoring Stations 196
3.10 Summary Of Noise Levels 196
3.11 Limits As Per Environmental Protection Rules, 1986 197
3.12 Water Sampling Stations 198
3.13 Surface Water Quality 199
3.14 Ground Water Quality 202
3.15 Observations 206
3.16 Soil Sampling Stations 207
3.17 Physico-Chemical Characteristics Of Soil 207
3.18 TLOCATION OF SAMPLING STATIONS 209
3.19 Flora In The Study Area 210
3.20 Fauna In The Study Area 211
3.21 Break-Up Of The Study Area 213
3.22 Distribution Of Population 213
3.23 Distribution Of Literates And Literacy Levels In The Study Area 214
3.24 List Of Infrastructural Facilities In The Surroundings 215
3.25 Connectivity From The Project Site 215
3.26 Existing Land Use Pattern 220
4.0 Air Quality Management During Operation Phase 230
4.1 Noise Management During Operation Phase 231
4.2 Water Quality Management During Operation Phase 232
4.3 Land Quality Management During Operation Phase 232
4.4 Implementation Schedule For EMP 233
4.5 Financial Allocation/Budgetary Provisions For Environmental
Management
233
4.6 Actions Likely To Affect Environment 234
xii
4.7 Environmental Impact Assessment During Construction Phase 236
4.7.1 Environmental Impact Assessment During Operation Phase 237
4.8 Impact Matrix 239
6.1 Monitoring Schedule For Environmental Parameters 244
6.2 Financial Allocation/Budgetary Provisions For Monitoring Program 247
7.1 Product Wise Solvents Recovered In Kg 251
7.2 Probable Hazards In The Plant 272
7.3 Severity Mapping 254
7.4 Degree Of Hazard 270
7.5 Preventive Systems Provided In The Plant 271
7.6 Damage Due To Incident Radiation Intensities 272
7.7 Radiation Exposure And Lethality 272
7.8 Properties Of Solvents And Fuels 273
7.9 Fire Protection System Proposed For M/S.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
274
7.10 Data Considered For Calculation Of GlC 285
7.11 Predicted Incremental Short-Term Concentrations Due To The
Proposed Project
286
7.12 Resultant Maximum 24 Hourly Concentrations 302
9.1 CBA For M/S. M/S.Shilpa Medicare Limited,100% EOU 311
10.1 Environmental Management Plan During Construction Phase 315
10.2 Environmental Management Plan During Operation Phase 317
10.3 Environmental Management Plan During Storage, Handling &
Transportation Of Raw Materials And Products
320
11.0 Measures Adopted To Mitigate The Impacts 325
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES Fig. No.
Description Pg. No
1.0 Location Map 29
2.0 Maps Showing Project Boundary & Project Site Location 53
2.1 Layout Plan 57
2.1 A Plant Photos. 58
2.2 Typical Solvent Recovery System 80
2.3 Feasibility & Environmental Assessment Process 128
2.4 Water balance chart 132
2.5 ETP Flow Chart For HTDS Flow Diagram 144
2.6 Proposed LTDS Effluent Diagram 145
2.7 Column scrubber 156
3.0 Topo Map Of The Study Area 178
3.1 Wind Rose Diagrams 183
3.2 Wind Rose Diagram – December to February (sampling period) 192
3.3 Location Of Sampling Stations 208
3.4 Google Map Showing Connectivity 216
3.5 Google Map Covering 1 Km Aerial Distance From The Project Site 217
3.6 Google Map Covering 5 Km Aerial Distance From The Project Site 218
3.7 Google Map Covering 10 Km Aerial Distance From The Project Site 219
3.8 Google Map Showing Land-Use Pattern 221
7.1 Suspended Particulate Matter (PM) Isotherms For The Proposed Project (Existing + Proposed)
288
7.2 Sulfur Di-Oxide (So2) Isotherms For Proposed Project (Existing + Proposed) 291
7.3 Oxides Of Nitrogen (NOx) Isotherms For Proposed Project (Existing + Proposed)
294
7.4 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Isotherms For Proposed Project (Existing + Proposed)
297
12.1 Organizational Chart Of Environmental Consultants 323
xiv
LIST OF ANNEXURE
Annexure Description
1 Hazop Analysis
Appended at the end
of the report
2 Environmental Policy
3 Authorization/Membership for the disposal of solid/hazardous waste in TSDF
4 Employees Heath Status Annual Report
5 Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)
A Copy of EC, CFE, CFO & Compliance report
B Project related drawings
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 1 -
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47,
Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka
intends to expand and modify the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats
manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry at Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A &
40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist.
The plant is located at Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth
Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka.
The Environmental Clearance has been obtained from MOEF for the Active
Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediates manufacturing industry with R & D
activity vide EC letter no F.No. J-11011/71/2007-IA II (I) Dated March 12th 2008, and also
Consent for Establishment has obtained from KSPCB and since then the industry is in
operation with valid Consent for Operation from KSPCB.
Now the proponents intend to Expand and Modify the existing Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediates manufacturing industry with R & D activity.
Existing products:
Table 1.0:- Existing products
S.NO Existing Product Name Manufacturing Qty as per EC in MT/Year
1 Ambroxyl Hcl 47
2 Anatrazole 0.1
3 Gemcitabine Hcl 0.1
4 Paclitaxel 0.1
5 Temozolabide 0.1
6 Bicalutamide 0.5
7 Irinotecon Hcl Trihydrate 0.1
8 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid 60
9 Cisplatin (to be deleted) 0.1
10 Carboplatin (to be deleted) 0.35
11 Co-Enzyme Q10 (to be deleted) 18
12 Docetaxel (to be deleted) 0.1
13 Oxoplatin (to be deleted) 0.05 Total 126.8
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 2 -
2. PURPOSE OF STUDY Environmental Impact Assessment Report has been prepared for obtaining Environmental
Clearance for the production activities involving expand and modify the Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing
industry of M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., as it falls under Category 5(f) and is included in the
category of the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification issued in September-2006 and
subsequent amendments.
3. EXTENT OF STUDY AND AREA COVERED
The broad scope of this EIA study includes detailed characterization of baseline environmental
parameters/attributes (ambient air, water, soil, noise) selected for study in an area of 10 km
radius from the proposed project site. This EIA is prepared, based on studies carried out during
December 2016 to Febraury 2017. The following are the salient tasks within the scope.
To assess the existing status of air, noise, water, land, biological and socio-economic
components of environment.
To identify and quantify significant impacts of various operations on environmental
components during construction & operation phases.
To evaluate proposed pollution control measures.
To prepare Environmental Impact Statement outlining additional control technologies to
be adopted for mitigation of adverse impacts on the environment and the surroundings.
In addition to the above, the report would discuss about the TOR laid down by State Level
Expert Appraisal Committee, Karnataka vide letter no. SEIAA 50 IND 2016 dated 09th
Janaury 2017.
4. METHOD OF STUDY
The study is carried out based on guidelines of MoEF and identifies the nature of activities
involved and the impacts caused on various environmental parameters. It subsequently suggests
mitigation measures to be executed for safeguarding against any environmental degradation.
Finally, it suggests methods of implementing the environmental management plan.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 3 -
5. PROJECT PROPOSAL
The Environmnetal Clearance has been obtained from MOEF for the Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity vide EC letter no
F.No. J-11011/71/2007-IA II (I) Dated March 12th 2008, and also Consent for Establishment has
obtained from KSPCB. Now the proponent intends to expand & modify Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) & intermediates manufacturing industry by keeping & expanding some
products with additional products. Some of the products will be deleted. The details of existing
products and proposed products is shown in below table 1.1.
Table: - 1.1 Existing Products
Sl.No. Existing Product Name Manufacturing Qty in MT/Annum.
1 Ambroxyl Hcl 47
2 Anatrazole 0.1
3 Gemcitabine Hcl 0.1
4 Paclitaxel 0.1
5 Temezdomide 0.1
6 Bicalutamide 0.5
7 Irinotecon Hcl Trihydrate 0.1
8 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid 60
9 Cisplatin 0.1
10 Carboplatin 0.35
11 Co-Enzyme Q10 18
12 Docetaxel Trihydrate 0.1
13 Oxoplatin 0.05
14
Total 126.8
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 4 -
Table: - 1.2 The API’s & Intermediates Proposed to Be Manufactured
S.NO Existing Product Name
Manufacturing Qty as per EC in
MT/Year
Proposed Product Name
Manufacturin g Qty in MT/Year
Applications
1 Ambroxyl Hcl 47 Ambroxol HCl 10 API
2 Anatrazole 0.1 Anasrozole 0.1 API
3 Gemcitabine Hcl
0.1 Gemcitabine HCl 0.1 API
4 Paclitaxel 0.1 Paclitaxel 0.1 API
5 Temozolabide 0.1 Temozolabide 0.1 API
6 Bicalutamide 0.5 Bicalutamide 0.5 API
7 Irinotecon Hcl Trihydrate
0.1 Docetaxel Trihydrate
0.1 API
8 3a,7B-Dihydroxy
Cholanic Acid
60 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
60 Intermediate
9 Cisplatin (to be deleted) 0.1
Bendamustine hcl 0.2 API
10 Carboplatin (to be deleted) 0.35
Bortzomib 0.005 API
11 Co-Enzyme Q10
(to be deleted) 18
Capacitabine 60 API
12 Docetaxel (to be deleted) 0.1
Imatinib 5 API
13 Oxoplatin (to be deleted) 0.05
Lenalidomide 0.5 API
14 Letrozole 0.05 API
15 PMD 0.25 API
16
Decitabine 0.01 API
17 Cytrabine 0.05 API
18 Cabazitaxel 0.01 API
19 Acebrophylline 10 API
20 Cloferabine 0.01 API
21 Melphalan 0.025 API
22 Cyclophosphamide 1 API
23 Tenfovir 50 API
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 5 -
24 PMK 0.25 API
25 Erlotonib 2 API
26 Emtricitabine 1 API
27 Dimethyl fumarate 12 API
28 Elvitegravir 1 API
29 Cobicistat 100 API
30 Busulfan 0.05 API
31 Zoledranic Acid 0.005 API
32 Tranexamic Acid 100 API
33 Sunitinib Malate 3 API
34 Sorafenib Tosylate 3 API
35 Abiraterone acetate
2 API
Total 126.8
422.415
Note: At any given time only 10 products will be manufactured on campaign basis.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47,
Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka
intends to expand and modify the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats
manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry at Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A &
40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist.
Latitude: 16°18'38.31"N; Longitude: 77°21'23.81"E, 357 m above MSL.
The project well connected by NH-167 & SH 51 road at about 1 km. Therefore the project site is well connected by roadways. Yedlapur Railway Station is at a distance of about 8.69 km towards North West direction. Hence the raw materials and the other utilities required by the industry can be easily transported.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 6 -
6. PROJECT AT GLANCE
Sl.No. Details
1 Project Expansion and Modification of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity manufacturing industry – “M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited.,”
2 Project developers M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka.
3 Location of the site Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka.
4 Constitution of the Organization
Public limited Company
5 Raw materials Details of the raw materials required by the industry is appended in Section 3.6.1, Chapter 3 of this report.
6 Product/s proposed to be manufactured with production capacities?
The following APIs are proposed to be manufactured
S.NO Proposed Product Name
Manufacturing Qty in MT/Year
1 Ambroxol HCl 10
2 Anasrozole 0.1
3 Gemcitabine HCl 0.1
4 Paclitaxel 0.1
5 Temozolabide 0.1
6 Bicalutamide 0.5
7 Docetaxel Trihydrate 0.1
8 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
60
9 Bendamustine hcl 0.2
10 Bortzomib 0.005
11 Capacitabine 60
12 Imatinib 5
13 Lenalidomide 0.5
14 Letrozole 0.05
15 PMD 0.25
16 Decitabine 0.01
17 Cytrabine 0.05
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 7 -
18 Cabazitaxel 0.01
19 Acebrophylline 10
20 Cloferabine 0.01
21 Melphalan 0.025
22 Cyclophosphamide 1
23 Tenfovir 50
24 PMK 0.25
25 Erlotonib 2
26 Emtricitabine 1
27 Dimethyl fumarate 12
28 Elvitegravir 1
29 Cobicistat 100
30 Busulfan 0.05
31 Zoledranic Acid 0.005
32 Tranexamic Acid 100
33 Sunitinib Malate 3
34 Sorafenib Tosylate 3
35 Abiraterone acetate 2
422.415
7 Project cost? Rs.6040 Lakhs.
8 Total man power requirement during occupancy phase
Occupancy/Operational phase: Existing :- 350 Employess Afetr Expansion: - 600 employees and contract persons
9 Proposed trees to be planted?
Exisiting number of tree : 400 Trees proposed to be planted – 100
10 Species of trees to be planted?
Araka, Silver Oak, Wild Badam, Mango, Neem trees, Michelia champaca, Butea monosperma, Pongamia pinnata, Bauhinia purpurea, Cassia fistula, Alstonia scholaris, and several native species
11 Rain water harvesting tank details?
200 KL capacity of open pond
12 Elevation of the project site with respect to MSL?
357 m above MSL; Latitude: 16°18'38.31"N; Longitude: 77°21'23.81"E
13 Total area of the project? 84,984.SQM ( 21.0 Acres)
14 Ground water quality? Potabile, however it has be aceratined.
15 Noise levels? Noise levels is well within the ambient noise stnd. However it has to be acertained.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 8 -
7. OVERALL JUSTIFICATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT
Bulk drugs have become a part of our life for sustaining many of our day-to-day activities, preventing and controlling diseases. Bulk drugs manufacturing sector in India is well established and has recorded a steady growth in the overall Indian industrial scenario. The bulk drugs and allied industries have been amongst the fastest growing segments of the Indian industry.
The Indian Pharmaceutical Industry today is in the front rank of India’s science-based industries with wide ranging capabilities in the complex field of drug manufacture and technology. It is expected to reach a level of Rs 3200 billion by 2012. It ranks very high in the third world, in terms of technology, quality and range of medicines manufactured. From simple headache pills to sophisticated antibiotics and complex cardiac compounds, almost every type of medicine is now made indigenously.
Playing a key role in promoting and sustaining development in the vital field of medicines, Indian Pharma Industry boasts of quality producers and many units approved by regulatory authorities in USA and UK. International companies associated with this sector have stimulated, assisted and spearheaded this dynamic development in the past years and helped to put India on the pharmaceutical map of the world.
India's pharmaceutical industry is the third largest in the world in terms of volume. Its rank is 14th in terms of value. India is also one of the top five active pharmaceutical ingredients (API)producers (with a share of about 6.5 per cent).
The pharmaceutical industry in India meets around 70% of the country's demand for bulk drugs, drug intermediates, chemicals, tablets, capsules, orals and injectibles. .Between September 2008 and September 2009, the total turnover of India's pharmaceuticals industry was US $21.04 billion. The domestic market was worth US $12.26 billion. This was reported by the Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers. As per a report by IMS Health India, the Indian pharmaceutical market reached US $10.04 billion in size in July 2010. A highly organized sector, the Indian Pharma Industry is estimated to be worth $4.5 billion, growing at about 8 to 9 percent annually.
The pharmaceutical industry in Karnataka contributes Rs. 350 crore in revenue to the State exchequer and provides employment for 12,000 people. Its growth rate is between 10-12 per cent as against the national pharma growth of 12-14 percent. Pharma products worth Rs. 2,000 crore are produced annually, which is 10 per cent of the national production. The exports sales are Rs.850 crore which is 8 per cent of Indian exports. International pharma majors have preferred many companies from the State. When large companies offer their services on contractual basis to global MNCs, they want to outsource drug production for the domestic market from quality small-medium manufacturers in State. Here the small-medium units ideally fit into slot as third party manufacturers and serve as major hubs for
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 9 -
pharmaceutical outsourcing. In fact, two of Indian pharma sectors top five brands, are already outsourced from Karnataka. The units have been recognised for stringent regulatory enforcement and known to manufacture quality products. Another added advantage favoring the State is that it is emerging as an investment destination. Hence the proponents have proposed the expansion and modification of the pharmaceutical industry - M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
BASELINE STATUS
Three months data during the period of December 2016 to Febraury 2017has been collected for
environmental attributes like air, water, soil, noise, ecology, socio-economic etc. within a radius
of 10 km to assess the baseline environmental status of the proposed project area. Secondary
data from different government, semi-government and private agencies and sources are
collected, interpreted, compiled and presented to authenticate and draw a conclusion regarding
the baseline status of the environment in the study area.
PUBLIC AMENITIES
Water supply
Most of the villages in the study area are provided with basic civic amenities. Water supply source
in the villages within the study area is basically BWSSB & water in the form of well water, tap
water, tank water, tube well, hand pumps etc. are also found.
Transportation & communication
The study area has a well connected road network. The project well connected by NH-167 & SH 51 road at about 1 km. Therefore the project site is well connected by roadways. Yedlapur Railway Station is at a distance of about 8.69 km towards North West direction. Hence the raw materials and the other utilities required by the industry can be easily transported.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 10 -
Electricity
Electricity is supplied to all main and remote places for various needs such as domestic, industrial
and agricultural requirements in the study area.
Health, medical and educational facility
Various health & medical facilities available within study area are Community Health Workers,
Primary Health Centre, Hospitals, Child Welfare Centre, and Dispensary & Subsidized Medical
Practitioner.
List of hospitals details are shown in below table 2.0
Table 2.0 hospital Facilities
Sl. No.
Hospital Distance from the industry (km)
Direction w.r.t. the industry
1 Primary Health Center, Ramadurga
30 West
2 Rajiv Gandhi Memorial Hospital
9 South
3 Government Hospital, Raichur 10.1 South
4 Chaitanya Hospital 11.8 South West
AIR ENVIRONMENT
The ambient air quality status around the proposed project area is characterized using the
following sources of data.
Ambient air quality monitoring data for selected locations within 10 km radius of study
area.
Meteorological data of the project location is obtained for the year 2016 from modeling
studies carried out using U.S. EPA AERMOD dispersion model, 1996 – 2016 Lakes
Environmental Software, Version 7.1.0
Existing air quality
To evaluate the baseline status of the ambient air quality, a short term survey was conducted at
six locations around the proposed project site including residential/rural/ and industrial area for
a period of 3 months from December 2016 to Febraury 2017. Ambient air quality standards –
MoEF as per the notification dated 16th November 2009 for industrial, residential & rural areas
were considered as the standard. During the study period, concentrations of SPM (PM10 & PM2.5),
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 11 -
SO2, NOx, CO etcwere measured. From the observations, it has been concluded that the
concentration of pollutants under consideration are within the specified limits of NAAQS for
industrial and residential areas.
Six locations were considered for studying baseline ambient air quality. A brief study report is
appended subsequently.
Table 3:- Ambient air quality
Sl. No.
Parameter 24 Hrs concentration (µg/m3) Monitoring station
At all locations
1 PM2.5, µg/m3 14.66-26.6 2 PM10, µg/m3 33-54.33 3 SO2, µg/m3 6.5-13.5
4 NOx, µg/m3 7.9-11.03 5 NH3, µg/m3 ND 6 Pb, µg/m3 ND 7 O3, µg/m3 10-14 8 C6H6, µg/m3
ND 9 Benzo(a) pyrene in particulate phase, ng/m3
10 As, ng/m3 <0.01
11 Ni, ng/m3
12 CO, mg/m3 0.1-0.5
13 HC, ppm ND 14 Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs), ppm
WATER ENVIRONMENT
Seven water samples (3 – surface & 6 - groundwater) were collected in the study zone such as
project site and surroundings & analyzed for their physico- chemical characteristics to evaluate
the existing status of water quality and assess the impact of the proposed project on water
environment.
The ground water analysis results indicate that few parameters like total hardness, TDS for the
groundwater samples is above the limiting standards laid down in Drinking Water Standards (IS:
10500-1991).
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 12 -
However, the required water for this industrial area is supplied by KIADB water supply sources
from river Kabini and therefore effect of ground water quality may not be relavent.
Existing water quality
Studies on the physico-chemical characteristics of the ground water samples in the study area
indicate that the area is free from any abnormalities with regard to its quality.
Water sampling & analysis was carried out for three surface water & Six groundwater samples
for physico-chemical analysis. The observations made are as follows.
Table 4: Characterization of ground water quality
Sl. no.
Parameter Surface water Ground water
1 pH 7.6 - 8.17 7.48 - 8.12
2 Total dissolved solids, mg/L 274 - 336 366 - 448
3 Total hardness, mg/L 125 - 135 150 – 700
4 Fluoride, mg/L 0.60 0.53 – 1.35
Note:
Sl.
No.
Code
No.
Name of the Station
1 GW 1 Project site
2 GW 2 Chiksugur (downwind direction)
3 GW 3 Hanumandoddi
4 GW 4 Yermaras
5 GW 5 Hospet
6 GW 6 Shaktinagar
7 SW 1 Krishna river upstream
8 SW2 Krishna river downstream
9 SW3 Konad Halla
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 13 -
NOISE ENVIRONMENT
Existing noise level
Noise level monitoring was conducted at six locations within the study area representing
industrial & residential areas. From the observations, it may be concluded that the noise levels
are within the prescribed limit specified by the statutory authorities for industrial areas.
Table 5: Details of noise level monitoring
Sl.
No.
Code
No.
Name of the Station Lowest
dB (A)
Highest dB (A)
1 N 1 Project site 40.7 49.0
2 N 2 Chiksugur (downwind direction)
31.5 43.8
3 N 3 Hanumandoddi 37.8 46.4
4 N 4 Yermaras 37.3 47.5
5 N 5 Hospet 38.3 48.6
6 N 6 Shaktinagar 41.8 45.8
Note:
N 1 Project site
N 2 Chiksugur (downwind direction)
N 3 Hanumandoddi
N 4 Yermaras
N 5 Hospet
N 6 Shaktinagar
SOIL ENVIRONMENT
The results of the analysis show that the nature of the soil is neutral.
The soil in the study area has pH in the range of 7.69 – 9.35 & conductivity in the range of 79.0 – 189.0 µs/cm. Potassium, Nitrogen & Phosphorous were in the range of 0.01-0.17 %, 0.07– 0.078 %, 0.007-0.018%.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 14 -
FLORA & FAUNA
There are naturally growing plants, vegetation & grasses. Land within the study zone is
moderately dry, barren with patches of green fields surrounding the rural village settings. Tree
species attaining moderate to considerable height are found to be present in sparsely distributed
area. The biodiversity of vegetation in the area is not very high due to intense agro ecosystem.
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
The biological environment is another important component on which impact of the industrial
activity needs to be studied. The terrestrial and aquatic life forms of flora and fauna constitute
the biological environment. Adequate measures will be undertaken for mitigating & controlling
all the sources of pollution & hence no adverse impact on the biological environment is envisaged
due to the proposed project activities and operations. Moreover, a considerable area of
56,066.06 sq m (i.e. 65.9 % of total plot area) of the proposed project site would be covered by
green-belt. It will also nullify or stabilize the impact of pollutants which may remain beyond the
scope of pollution impact assessment.
The fauna found in the region does not show much diversity as there is no suitable habitat for
the occurrence of ecologically important fauna in the area. The wild life species in the study area
includes few mammals, like common fox, hare, reptiles, common jackal, wolf, bats and domestic
animals.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
The proposed project is exapansion and modification of the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
(APIs) & Intermediates manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry. During
the construction phase, local people will be employed providing direct and indirect
employments. Thus, a positive impact is envisaged on socio-economic environment of the
locality.
9. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
During construction phase, all precautionary measures for controlling emissions, soil erosion and
noise reduction will be undertaken. The effect due to construction will be of temporary nature
and will have no permanent effect on the environment.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 15 -
OPERATION PHASE
Environmental impacts associated with the operation phase are detailed in the following
sections.
AIR EMISSIONS
Sources of air pollution
The sources of air pollution in the proposed industry are
Process section – proposed to be provided with column scrubbers & stack of adequate heights.
Boilers – proposed to be provided with stack of adequate height.
DG set – proposed to be provided with stack of adequate height.
Impact on air quality
No adverse impact on air environment is envisaged due to the proposed project, as adequate measures are proposed to be adopted.
Pollutants in the form of oxides of nitrogen, sulfur & SPM from generator, boiler & acid mist/VOCs
from the process sections are considered. Adequate stack heights for DG & boilers are proposed
to mitigate emissions & hence no adverse impact is envisaged on existing environment.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 16 -
Table 6: Air pollution sources, fuel consumption and chimney height details
SI. no.
Stack attached to Fuel used
Fuel consumption
Number of
stacks
Stack height
Air pollution control unit
Predicted emissions
Existing
1 Process section(scrubbers)
(Production block & Finishing block 5 nos each)
- - 15 3 m ARL for each
Packed column scrubbers – 15 no.s
Acid mist/ VOCs
1 Steam boilers – 6 TPH + 10 TPH– 1 no each
Coal/ Furnace oil / Husk
1303.06 kgs/Hr
1 32 m AGL (common stack for the 2 boilers)
Mechanical dust collectors/ multicyclone - 2 no.s
SO2, NOx, SPM
2 D.G. sets - 625 kVA – 3 no.s
HSD 125 L/hr 3 6 m ARL for each DG set
Stack SO2, NOx, SPM
Proposed
1 D.G. set new install -750 KVA-1 no.s
HSD 150 L/hr 1 6 m ARL For each DG set
stack SO2, NOx, SPM
2 Process section (Newly insttalled thermic flueid) 6 lakh kilo kalaries-1 no’s
FO/LDO 71 kgs/Hr 1 14 m AGL
(combined stack)
Stack SO2, NOx, SPM
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 17 -
SOURCE OF WATER POLLUTION
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL DETAILS
The treatment methods and the final disposal of each type of wastewater generated is appended in the table 7.0 below
Table: -7 Sewage/wastewater treatment and discharge
Type of wastewater
Source Quantity, KLD Treatment Re-use of treated
wastewater
Low strength
Process Effluent, Washing effluent & Domestic waste water
130.5 Treated in Effluent treatment palnt followed by Reverse Osmosis. Domestic waste is treated in ETP at the stage of Biological treatment.
cooling tower make-up & Boiler feed water etc.
High strength
Process Effluent, R&D Effluent,
Scrubber wastes, LSWW ETP RO (38.25 KLD )
reject & Shipa Medicare Unit –I
effluent.
84.75 KLD = 58.75 KLD
from this unit + 26 KLD From
Unit-I
Treated in Effluent treatment plant followed by MEE.
High strength
DM plant/ Softner rejects &
Cooling tower bleed off.
50 KLD Treated in High rate Solids contact clarifier tank (HRSCC).
Note: - Additional 26 KLD Effluent from Shilpa Medicare Unit – I will be added to
this Unit for further treatment and disposal and we have the permission for the same.
Impact on water environment
No adverse impact on the water environment is envisaged as adequate treatment
facilities & disposal options are envisaged for the wastewater. Also since the water supply
is from KIADB Water Supply, no adverse impact on the water balance of the area and
changes in Groundwater level and its characteristics is anticipated.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 18 -
NOISE
Sources of noise
The main sources of noise at present are movement of vehicles on the roads. From the
proposed project, it is envisaged that the DG sets & the process activities will be the
additional source of noise near the project site.
Impact on noise level
Computations based on data and analysis, the distance of noise sources from the project
site and the attenuation due to green belt reveals that the noise level in the study area
will remain practically unchanged. Thus, no impact on existing noise level is foreseen in
the surrounding industrial and residential areas due to the proposed project activities and
operations. Since the proposed industry is located in notified industrial area and also due
to the fact that the proposed industry is to be involved in the Bulk drugs & Intermediates
manufacturing industry, the industry will not have any bearing on the sound generation
and impacts due to the same.
SOLID WASTE
Solid waste management
The solid waste generated from the industry is of 2 types – domestic garbage & hazardous
waste. The total quantity of waste generated with disposal options are detailed below.
Domestic garbage
Table 8: Solid waste generation & management
Total no. of employees 600
Assuming per capita solid waste generation rate as 0.2 kg/capita/day
Quantity of solid waste generated 120 kg/day
Organic solid waste : 60 % of the total waste 72 kg/day
Inorganic solid waste : 40 % of the total waste 48 kg/day
Disposal of domestic solid waste The domestic wastes are segregated at source, collected in bins and composted.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 19 -
Hazardous solid waste
The quantities of hazardous waste generated from various processes are shown in the
following table 9.
Table 9: Summary of the total quantity of hazardous wastes:
Sl. No.
Source Quantity of hazardous waste generated
Category according to Schedule I of hazardous waste categories
Treatment/ Disposal
kg/month kg/annum
1 Process residue 723.5 8682.4 28.1 Send to Co processing industries in cement industries.
2 Inorganic salt from Process
8073.295 kg 96879.54 kg 34.3 Send to TSDF (Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility), Bangalore
3 Spent Carbon 211.36 2536.3 28.2 Send to Co processing industries in cement industries
4 Spent catalyst 875.4
11,800.8
28.2 Sent to manufacturer/ reprocessor for recycle and reuse.
5 Waste oil from DG set & boiler
150 L/Month 1800 L/annum
5.1 Handed over to KSPCB authorized recyclers/re-processors
6 Spent Solvent 51940 L/month 623288 L/annum
20.2
Solvent distillation inhouse/Send to authorized spent solvent re-processors for recover & re-use.
7 Distillation residue
1.5 MT/month 20.3 MT/annum
20.3 Send to Co processing industries in cement industries
8 Salt from Multiple effect Evaporation System
32739 kg/monh (26739 kg from unit-2 + 6000 from unit-1)
393 Tons/annum
34.3 Send to TSDF (Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility), Bangalore/ Co processing industries.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 20 -
9 ETP Sludge 3000 kg 36000 kg 34.4 Send to TSDF (Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility), Bangalore/ Co processing industries.
10 Discarded Containers/ liners /barrels
500 No’s/month 6000 no’s/annum
33.3 Handed over to KSPCB authorized recyclers/re-processors
11 Used Batteries -- 05 Hand over to authorized re – cyclers.
12 E-Waste 5 kg 60 kg Handed over to KSPCB authorized recyclers/re-processors.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 21 -
10. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
10.1 Environmental impacts and management plan
Environmental management plan during operation phase
Table 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN DURING OPERATION PHASE
Sl. no.
Environmental components
Predicted impacts
Probable source of impact Mitigation measures Remarks
1 Ambient air quality
Minor negative impact.
Process of manufacture of APIs & Intermediates
Particulate and gaseous emissions from DG set and boilers & Thermic Fluid heater
Manufacturing process involves closed operations in various controlled reactors.
The process area will be provided with abundant natural light and ventilation and high roofs to disperse the fumes/gases to the outside atmosphere; preventing the increase of ground level concentrations (GLC’S) as it gets dispersed.
Packed column scrubbers are proposed to neutralize and control dust and fumes from the process section.
The treated waste gases and fumes will be let out through stacks of 5 m height ARL.
The emissions from DG & boiler will be let out through stacks of heights 3 m ARL and 32 m AGL respectively.
DG sets will be used only during power failure.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 22 -
2 Noise Minor negative impact near noise generation sources inside the premises.
Operation of machineries during the manufacturing process.
Handling and conveying of raw materials and semi-finished components to different areas of operations
Operation of DG set.
The conveying system shall be maintained by following routine and periodic maintenance to reduce noise generation in material handling.
DG set with prebuilt acoustic enclosure as per CPCB norms will be installed in dedicated utility area, where the access will be restricted. Also the use of PPE (ear plugs) will be mandatory in this area.
Green belt at the project boundary will further act as noise barrier and help in attenuation of noise.
-
3 Water quality No significant adverse impact
Discharge of domestic sewage and industrial effluent
Domestic sewage will be mixed with low strength wastewater stream & re-used for cooling tower make-up water etc.
The effluent generated from the industry will be treated in ETP followed by RO & MEE.
Water conservation measures will be encouraged.
4 Land No negative impact
Discharge of wastewater.
Storage and disposal of solid wastes.
The treated wastewater will be re-used for cooling tower make-up water etc.
The domestic solid wastes are segregated at source, collected in bins and composted and inert portion will be handed over to authorized recyclers.
-
5 Socio-economic Overall positive impact
Employment opportunities
Locally available man power will be utilized to the maximum possible extent.
-
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 23 -
10.2 POST-PROJECT MONITORING PLAN
A comprehensive monitoring program is suggested in below table 11.0
Table: - 11 monitoring schedule for environmental parameters
Sl. No
Particulars
Monitoring frequency
Duration of monitoring
Important parameters for monitoring
I Air quality
a Ambient air monitoring
1. Project premises Once in a month 24 hourly sample RSPM, SPM, SO2, NOx
2. Stack monitoring Once in a month Grab SPM, SO2, NOx, HC, CO
II Water and wastewater quality
b Water quality
i. Groundwater at two locations (up-gradient and down-gradient)
Once in a month Grab As per KSPCB requirements
c Wastewater quality
i. Low strength & high strength wastewater streams (raw & treated)
Once in a month Grab As per KSPCB requirements
III Soil quality
1. Within project premises at 1 location
Once in a year Composite sample As per KSPCB requirements
2. Ecological preservation and up-gradation
Seasonal Visual observations
Survival rate
IV Noise monitoring
1. Project premises Once in a year Day and night As per KSPCB requirements
V Hazardous waste monitoring
1. Hazardous waste characterization
Annually Day and night As per KSPCB requirements
CONCLUSION
The overall impact of the project is beneficial as the impacts on air, noise, water, soil and
biological environment are not significant and socio-economic impacts are predominantly
positive. All the relevant safety norms & precautionary measures would be incorporated in the
system, to ensure that the project is environmentally viable.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 24 -
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
Amendment of the Environmental Impact Notification No. S.O. 60(E) dated 27.01.1994, issued by
the MoEF, Govt. of India has made mandatory under Schedule-I of EIA notification for 30 different
activities to obtain NOC (No Objection Certificate) from the State Pollution Control Board and
Environmental Clearance from the Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of re Public
HearinIndia. This amendment to the EIA Notification is effective from 14.09.2006. It is in this
context that all such activities need to prepare Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report
and also appear befog to ascertain the response of Public for the project based on the general
and specific conditions in the said notification.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47,
Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka
intends to expand and modify the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats
manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry at Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A &
40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist.
The Environmnetal Clearance has been obtained from MOEF for the Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity vide EC letter no
F.No. J-11011/71/2007-IA II (I) Dated March 12th 2008, and also Consent for Establishment has
obtained from KSPCB. Now the proponent intends to expand & modify Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) & intermediates manufacturing industry by keeping & expanding some
products with additional products. Some of the products will be deleted.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 25 -
1.1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT & PROJECT PROPONENT 1.1.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PROJECT PROPONENT M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka intends to expand and modify the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry at Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist.
The proposed industry M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., is a Public Limited company. Shilpa
Medicare Limited (SML) started its operations as API manufacturer way back in 1987 at Raichur,
Karnataka- India. The commercial production in the SML was started in November 1989. We
initially started producing Trimethoprim IP/BP with in-house developed technology. During the
first year of its operation, the Company had expanded the production facilities to manufacture
Trimethoprim apart from selling on its own, for other reputed Companies like Eskayef Limited,
Bombay Drugs and Pharmas Limited, Bombay Drug House Ltd., US Vitamins Ltd, Sandoz India Ltd
etc. for their export commitments.
Near 1992, the Company had further enhanced its operations by inducting new production
facilities for manufacture of Sodium Methoxide. The technology for the Sodium Methoxide was
also developed in house. About the same time, the Company secured export business from Stellar
Exports Limited, Glaxo Limited and Deepak Nitrite Limited for Trimethoprim. Since then Shilpa
Medicare Limited has started exporting on its own. The Company thus started manufacturing for
both export and domestic markets since 1992.
The Company then embarked upon an expansion project which involved the addition of one
more bulk drugs to its existing product range viz; Norfloxcin and expansion of the production
capacity of the existing products of the Company viz; Sodium Methoxide and Trimethoprim. The
Company also developed a process for drug intermediate- 1-methyl amino-1-methylthio- 2-nitro
ethane, used in the manufacture of Ranitidine, which is an anti-ulcer drug. In November 1993,
Shilpa Medicare was converted into a Public Limited Company. The Company was listed on
Bombay Stock Exchange on Jun 19, 1995 and National Stock Exchange (NSE) on Dec 03,
2009.Subsequently; Shilpa Medicare has gained World Health Organization-Good Manufacturing
Practices (GMP) Certificate recognition. In our relentless efforts for growth-Shilpa Medicare
successfully set up a 100% EOU project in FY10 incurring a capital expenditure of nearly Rs.1000
million.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 26 -
Today, we have carved a niche for ourselves in the exceedingly competitive and quality-conscious
field of pharmaceuticals manufacturing. We aim to be amongst global leaders in generic APIs &
pharmaceutical products manufacturers, finding innovative ways to make affordable medicines
accessible to every section of the society. SML is committed to its mission of achieving affordable
healthcare, which shall be available to more and more people globally. ‘Global access to
affordable healthcare’- is how we see ourselves contributing to the field of medicine.
We are dealing with high-quality Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs), Intermediates,
Formulations, New Drug Delivery Systems, Peptides / Biotech products and Specialty Chemicals
etc. utilizing sophisticated technology meticulously in order to comply with international
standards/specifications. Today we are among the world’s leading suppliers of Oncology/non-
Oncology APIs and intermediates. Further to consolidation in field of generic APIs and
Formulations, we are striving for achieving excellence by putting our relentless efforts in field of
Novel Drug Delivery Systems (NDDS) and peptides/biotechnology, along with widening our focus
to other therapy areas. We aim for ensuring affordable healthcare without compromising quality
standards.
We are ISO 14001: 2004 certified organization and committed to implement, maintain and
improve the environmental management system so as to assure its conformity with our stated
environmental policy. We offer a broad and integrated portfolio of products and services
(CRAMS) to the global pharmaceutical industry. In recognition of our outstanding performance
we have been awarded time to time, with awards like ‘Best Entrepreneur Award’ and ‘Star Export
House’ by Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Govt. of India and National Energy Conservation
Award-2012 by President of India.
Being proactive in approach, we continuously seek out avenues and first available opportunities
for development of new products drawing strength from our zeal to provide affordable
healthcare to everyone. Our state-of-the-art infrastructure, more than 2 decades of experience,
and rigorous across-the-board quality standards all contribute to our commitment- Quality
Healthcare at a price which everyone can afford. Being Shilpa Medicare companies, our vision
and business plans are shared by our subsidiary organizations:
Loba Fienchem
Raichem Life Sciences
Nu Therapeutics
Reva Pharma
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 27 -
At Shilpa in our state of art facilities, we bring on board the expertise and passion for excellence
of our competent team to develop quality pharmaceuticals while building value to our partners
and stakeholders. We are known as a successful and reliable partner within the pharmaceutical
domain. Buyers within the country and from across the borders count on our fast track integrated
development plans. Shilpa Medicare’s skilled team and certified manufacturing capabilities have
proved to be significant differentiator among discerning buyers in the highly regulated markets
of US and Europe. Besides exporting to USA, Canada, Australia, Japan and European Countries
viz.,Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Greece, Cyprus, Italy, United Kingdom
etc., we also cater to South American Countries like Mexico, Brazil, and Columbia etc.; African
Countries like Kenya, Nigeria and West Indies etc. and Asian Countries like Singapore, Taiwan,
China, Malaysia, Thailand, etc.
Shilpa Medicare’s facilities have received key regulatory approvals for its facilities as well as for
the products from EDQM, UK-MHRA, TGA, USFDA, PMDA and KFDA. With diverse regulatory
recognized manufacturing set ups and excellent scientific manpower, Shilpa has been on a
consistent growth path, thus defining us: Shilpa Medicare-“Where growth is a habit”.
At Shilpa Medicare, we make every effort to create an environment of openness and
transparency. We believe in maintaining the trust and respect of all of our stakeholders and
customers by acting with integrity at all times. Our ultimate goal is to help all levels of society in
living healthier lives.
Raichur Unit-II Unit-II of Shilpa Medicare Ltd. Is a 100% Export Oriented API Unit. This unit is also well connected
to state highway as being located just adjacent to Hyderabad-Raichur state highway. This unit is
cerified by ISO 14001:2004 and approved of WHO-GMP/EUGMP.
This unit has expertise in :
Isolation, purification, separation techniques.
Asymmetric synthesis.
Chiral technology.
Reduction reaction.s
Customized synthesis/CRAMS activities. Now the company proposes to obtain Environmental Clearance from SEIAA for M/s. Shilpa
Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur,
Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka intends
to expand and modify the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats
manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 28 -
1.1.2 INTRODUCTION TO THE PROJECT
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47,
Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka
intends to expand and modify the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats
manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry at Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A &
40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist.
“M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited.,” has entered into a lease agreement with KIADB & a copy of the
lease deed is submitted earlier during ToR time.
“M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU” is located at latitude of 16°18'38.31"N; Longitude: 77°21'23.81"E at an elevation of 357 m above MSL.
The project well connected by NH-167 & SH 51 road at about 1 km. Therefore the project site is
well connected by roadways. Yedlapur Railway Station is at a distance of about 8.69 km towards
North West direction. Hence the raw materials and the other utilities required by the industry
can be easily transported.
1.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, SIZE, LOCATION OF THE PROJECT & ITS IMPORTANCE TO
THE COUNTRY, REGION
1.2.1 NATURE, SIZE & LOCATION OF THE PROJECT
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, is located at Unit –II, Plot No.
33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134,
Raichur Dist.
The locations of the Project site is as below in fig 1.0.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 29 -
Fig 1.0 LOCATION MAP
Source: - https://www.google.co.in/maps/
The proposed project is manufacturing of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry.
The APIs & intermediates manufacturing industry with R&D activity proposed to be manufactured are provided in below table 1.0.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 30 -
Table 1.0:- Existing Products
Sl.No. Existing Product Name Manufacturing Qty in MT/Annum
1 Ambroxyl Hcl 47
2 Anatrazole 0.1
3 Gemcitabine Hcl 0.1
4 Paclitaxel 0.1
5 Temezdomide 0.1
6 Bicalutamide 0.5
7 Irinotecon Hcl Trihydrate 0.1
8 Cisplatin 0.1
9 Carboplatin 0.35
10 Co-Enzyme Q10 18
11 Docetaxel Trihydrate 0.1
12 Oxoplatin 0.05
13 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
60
14 Total 126.8
Table: - 1.1 The API’s & Intermediates Proposed to Be Manufactured
S.NO Existing Product Name
Manufacturing Qty as per CFO
in MT/Year
Proposed Product Name
Manufacturing Qty in
MT/Year
1 Ambroxyl Hcl 47 Ambroxol HCl 10
2 Anatrazole 0.1 Anasrozole 0.1
3 Gemcitabine Hcl 0.1 Gemcitabine HCl 0.1
4 Paclitaxel 0.1 Paclitaxel 0.1
5 Temozolabide 0.1 Temozolabide 0.1
6 Bicalutamide 0.5 Bicalutamide 0.5
7 Irinotecon Hcl Trihydrate
0.1 Docetaxel Trihydrate
0.1
8 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
60 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
60
9 Cisplatin (To be deleted )
0.1 Bendamustine hcl 0.2
10 Carboplatin (To be deleted )
0.35 Bortzomib 0.005
11 Co-Enzyme Q10 (To be deleted )
18 Capacitabine 60
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 31 -
12 Docetaxel Trihydrate
(To be deleted )
0.1 Imatinib 5
13 Oxoplatin (To be deleted )
0.05 Lenalidomide 0.5
14 Letrozole 0.05
15 PMD 0.25
16
Decitabine 0.01
17 Cytrabine 0.05
18 Cabazitaxel 0.01
19 Acebrophylline 10
20 Cloferabine 0.01
21 Melphalan 0.025
22 Cyclophosphamide 1
23 Tenfovir 50
24 PMK 0.25
25 Erlotonib 2
26 Emtricitabine 1
27 Dimethyl fumarate 12
28 Elvitegravir 1
29 Cobicistat 100
30 Busulfan 0.05
31 Zoledranic Acid 0.005
32 Tranexamic Acid 100
33 Sunitinib Malate 3
34 Sorafenib Tosylate 3
35 Abiraterone acetate
2
Total 126.8
422.415
Note: The above products will be manufactured on campaign basis only.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 32 -
1.2.2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT AND ITS IMPORTANCE TO THE COUNTRY AND/REGION
Bulk drugs have become a part of our life for sustaining many of our day-to-day activities, preventing and controlling diseases. Bulk drugs manufacturing sector in India is well established and has recorded a steady growth in the overall Indian industrial scenario. The bulk drugs and allied industries have been amongst the fastest growing segments of the Indian industry.
The Indian Pharmaceutical Industry today is in the front rank of India’s science-based industries with wide ranging capabilities in the complex field of drug manufacture and technology. It is expected to reach a level of Rs 3200 billion by 2012. It ranks very high in the third world, in terms of technology, quality and range of medicines manufactured. From simple headache pills to sophisticated antibiotics and complex cardiac compounds, almost every type of medicine is now made indigenously.
Playing a key role in promoting and sustaining development in the vital field of medicines, Indian Pharma Industry boasts of quality producers and many units approved by regulatory authorities in USA and UK. International companies associated with this sector have stimulated, assisted and spearheaded this dynamic development in the past years and helped to put India on the pharmaceutical map of the world.
India's pharmaceutical industry is the third largest in the world in terms of volume. Its rank is 14th in terms of value. India is also one of the top five active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) producers (with a share of about 6.5 per cent).
The pharmaceutical industry in India meets around 70% of the country's demand for bulk drugs, drug intermediates, chemicals, tablets, capsules, orals and injectibles. .Between September 2008 and September 2009, the total turnover of India's pharmaceuticals industry was US $21.04 billion. The domestic market was worth US $12.26 billion. This was reported by the Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers. As per a report by IMS Health India, the Indian pharmaceutical market reached US $10.04 billion in size in July 2010. A highly organized sector, the Indian Pharma Industry is estimated to be worth $4.5 billion, growing at about 8 to 9 percent annually.
The pharmaceutical industry in Karnataka contributes Rs. 350 crore in revenue to the State exchequer and provides employment for 12,000 people. Its growth rate is between 10-12 per cent as against the national pharma growth of 12-14 percent. Pharma products worth Rs. 2,000 crore are produced annually, which is 10 per cent of the national production. The exports sales are Rs.850 crore which is 8 per cent of Indian exports. International pharma majors have preferred many companies from the State. When large companies offer their services on contractual basis to global MNCs, they want to outsource drug production for the domestic market from quality small-medium manufacturers in State. Here the small-medium units ideally fit into slot as third party manufacturers and serve as major hubs for
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 33 -
pharmaceutical outsourcing. In fact, two of Indian pharma sectors top five brands, are already outsourced from Karnataka. The units have been recognised for stringent regulatory enforcement and known to manufacture quality products. Another added advantage favoring the State is that it is emerging as an investment destination. Hence the proponents have proposed the expansion and modification of the pharmaceutical industry - M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist, Karnataka. 1.2.3 DEMAND SUPPLY GAP, IMPORTS VS INDIGENOUS PRODUCTION
Indian pharmaceutical companies supply almost all the country's demand for API and nearly 70
per cent of demand for bulk drugs. The imports of pharmaceuticals are estimated at 10 to 12
percent of the total market. The major suppliers are Switzerland, China, USA, Germany, Italy,
Denmark, France, and UK. Imports include raw materials and finished products. Some major
pharmaceuticals which are imported include Provitamins and Vitamins, Cortisones,
Hydrocortisone, Insulin, Penicillin, Osetrogen, Progesterone and other hormones, Erythromycin
and other ANTIBIOTICS, Antisera & other blood fraction, and Glycosides.
The imports are from Switzerland, US and Germany primarily consist of finished medicament in
dosage forms for retail sales.
1.2.4 EXPORT POSSIBILITY
The size of the domestic pharmaceutical market is larger than export market. However, owing to the growth of global generics market, stringent price controls in the domestic market, and better margins, the export market is growing much faster than the domestic market.
India exports pharmaceuticals to numerous countries around the world, including to the U.S., Germany, France, Russia and UK. The Indian pharmaceutical industry ranks 17th with respect to exports value of bulk actives and dosage. Exports constitute nearly 40 per cent of the production, with bulk drugs 45 per cent.
According to the Pharmaceutical Export Promotion Council (Pharmexcil), the pharmaceutical exports in 2007-08 stood at US $6.68 billion against US $5.73 billion in 2006-07, recording a growth rate of 16 per cent. The industry has been clocking export growth rate, recording 18 per cent, 23 per cent and 17 per cent growth rates during 2006-07, 2005-06, and 2004-05,
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 34 -
respectively. The overall pharmaceutical exports are estimated to increase at a CAGR of 30-32 percent and reach US $ 18.3 billion in 2010 - 11.
India exports to over 200 countries. Pharmaceutical exports clocked a CAGR of 10.3 per cent to US$ 15.5 billion during 2014–15 from US$ 10.4 billion during 2010–11. The US is the largest importer of Indian products. Exports to the UK grew at 11.9 per cent between 2009 and 2010, and 2013 and 2014. India has the highest number of plants approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) outside the US. Around 584 Indian companies/sites are registered with the USFDA. Several plants have also obtained regulatory approvals from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the UK; the Medicines Control Council (MCC) in South Africa; and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia. India has one of the lowest manufacturing cost in the world. Manufacturing cost in India is approximately 35–40 per cent of that in the US as installation and workforce costs are low.
1.3 SCOPE OF STUDY – DETAILS OF REGULATORY SCOPING CARRIED OUT (AS PER TERMS OF
REFERENCE)
The purpose of EIA/EMP is to critically analyze the environmental impacts due to Construction
and Operation of project with respect to effluent transportation, treatment and disposal of
treated effluent, disposal of sludge and mitigation measures to reduce the pollution and to
delineate an Environmental Management Plan along with recommendations and suggestions.
ToRs have been considered for prepeation of Environment Impact Assessment studies for the
project.
1.3.1 SCOPE OF STUDY
Collecting baseline data on different environmental parameters for the period from
December 2016 to Febraury 2017.
Impact assessment and suggestion of mitigation measures to minimize the impacts.
Preparation of Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan
Primary and secondary data collection for preparing EIA/ EMP Report.
Submission and presentation of salient features of EIA/EMP report to the EAC for
getting Environmental Clearance.
1.3.2 COMPONENTS OF EIA REPORT
Depending on nature, location and scale of the project, EIA report contains the following
components:
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 35 -
Air Environment
Noise Environment
Water Environment
Land Environment
Biological Environment
Socio-Economic and Health Environment
Environmental Monitoring Program
Environment Management Plan.
1.3.3 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR)
Terms of Reference (TOR) prescribed by the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee, Karnataka,
vide letter no. SEIAA 50 IND 2016 dated 09-01-2017 for the preparation of project report for the
proposed expansion and modification of the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) &
Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry of M/s. Shilpa
Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II is tabulated below table 1.1.
Table 1.2: Terms of Reference (TOR)
Sl. No.
Description Details provided in Chapter/Section
1. Executive summary of the project
2. Introduction
(i) Details of the EIA Consultant including NABET accreditation.
Chapter -12.
(ii) Information about the project proponent.
Section 1.1.1, Chapter – 1
(iii) Importance and benefits of the project.
Section 1.2.2, Chapter – 1
3. Project Description.
(i) Cost of project and time of completion.
Section 2.4, Chapter – 2
(ii) Products with capacities for the proposed project.
Section 1.2.1, Table 1.0 Chapter – 1
(iii) If expansion project, details of existing products with capacities and whether adequate land is available for expansion, reference earlier EC if any.
The Environmental Clearance has been obtained
from MOEF for the Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediates manufacturing
industry with R & D activity vide EC letter no F.No. J-
11011/71/2007-IA II (I) Dated March 12th 2008, and
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 36 -
also Consent for Establishment has obtained from
KSPCB. Now the proponent intends to expand &
modify Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) &
intermediates manufacturing industry by keeping &
expanding some products with additional products.
Some of the products will be deleted.
Section 1.2.1, Table 1.0 Chapter – 1
(iv) List of raw materials required and their source along with mode of transportation.
Section 2.7.4, Chapter – 2
(v) Other chemicals and materials required with quantities and storage capacities.
Section 2.7.4, Chapter – 2
(vi) Details of Emission, effluents, hazardous waste generation and their management.
Section 2.9, 2.9.2, 2.9.3, 2.9.3.5 Chapter – 2
(vii) Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram, man-power requirement (regular and contract).
Section 2.9, 2.9.2, 2.9.3.1, 2.5 & Fig 2.4,
Chapter -2.
Occupancy/Operational phase: 600 employees
(viii) Process description along with major equipments and machineries, process flow sheet (quantitative) from raw material to products to be provided.
Section 2.7 & 2.7.2 Chapter – 2
(ix) Hazard identification and details of proposed safety systems.
Section 2.9.3.5.2 Chapter – 2
(x) Expansion/ modernization proposals.
Section 1.2.1, Table 1.0 Chapter – 1
a) Copy of all the Environmental Clearance including Amendments thereto obtained for the project from MOEF/SEIAA shall be attached as an Annexure. A certified copy of the latest Monitoring Report of the Regional office of the Ministry of Environment and Forests as per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions stipulated in all the existing operation of the project from SPCB shall be attached with the EIA-EMP report.
Copy of Environmental Clearance and compliance report is attached as annexure -A
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 37 -
EC b) In case the existing project has not obtained environmental clearance, reasons for not taking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 and /or EIA Notification 2006 shall be provided. Copies of consent to consent to Establish/No objection Certificate and Consent to Operate ( in case of units operating prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE and CTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall be submitted. Further, compliance report to the conditions of consents from the SPCB shall be submitted. c) Comparative statement of existing and the proposed capacity, products, use of natural resource, waste generation, pollution potential, etc.,
The project has been accorded with Consent for Establishment from KSPCB for Herbal Extract products during the year 2008 from MoEF and since then the industry is running with valid CFO. Now the proponents intend to expand and modify the Active Pharmaceutical ingredients (API) & Intermediates. Copy of EC, CFE, CFO & Compliance report of the same is appended as annexure - A
4. Site Details:
(i) Location of the project site covering village, taluk/Tehsil, District and State, justification for selecting the site, whether other site were considered.
Fig. 3.1, Chapter -3 & Executive Summary.
(ii) A topo sheet of the study area of radius of 10Km and site location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet. (including all eco-sensitive areas and environ mentally sensitive places)
Fig. 3.1, Chapter -3 & Annexure-B
(iii) Details w.r.t option analysis for selection of site.
Chapter -5.
(iv) Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four corners of the site.
Table 2.0, Chapter-2.
(v) Google map-Earth downloaded of the project site.
Fig 2.0, Chapter -2.
(vi) Layout maps indicating existing unit as well as proposed unit indicating storage area, plant area, greenbelt area, utilities etc. if located within an Industrial area/Estate/Complex, layout of industrial Area indicating location of unit within the industrial area/Estate.
Fig 2.1, Chapter -2.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 38 -
(vii) Photographs of the proposed and existing (if applicable) plant site. If existing, show photographs of plantation/greenbelt, in particular.
Fig 2.1A, Chapter -2.
(viii) Landuse break-up of total land of the project site (identified and acquired), government / private – agricultural, forest, wasteland, water bodies, settlements, etc. shall be included. (not required for industrial area)
Section 2.6, Chapter -2.
(ix) A list of major industries with name and type within study area (10km radius) shall be incorporated. Land use details of the study area.
Table 2.4, Chapter-2.
(x) Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area shall be included.
Section 3.3.5, Chapter-3.
(xi) Details of Drainage of the project up to 5km radius of study area. If the site is within 1 km radius of any major river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency based on peak rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of flood level of the project site and maximum Flood level of the river shall also be provided. (mega green field projects)
NA, as the proposed project is located in designated industrial area.
(xii) Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not complete, stage of the acquisition process and expected time of complete possession of the land.
“M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited.,” has entered into a lease agreement with KIADB & a copy of the lease deed is submitted earlier during ToR time.
(xiii) R and R details in respect of land in line with state Government policy.
Section 7.7, Chapter-7.
5. Forest and wildlife related issues (if applicable):
(i) Permission and approval for the use of forest land (forestry clearance), if any, and recommendations of the State Forest Department. (If applicable) (ii) Landuse map based on High resolution satellite imagery (GPS) of the proposed site delineating the forestland (in case of projects involving forest land more than 40 ha)
NA, no forest is located within 10 km.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 39 -
(iii) Status of Application submitted for obtaining the stage 1 forestry clearance along with latest status shall be submitted. (iv) The projects to be located within 10 km of the National parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of wild animals, the project proponent shall submit the map duly authenticated by Chief wildlife Warden showing these features vis-à-vis the project location and the recommendations or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden-thereon. (v) Wildlife Conservation Plan duly authenticated by the Chief Wildlife Warden of the State Government for conservation of Schedule 1 fauna, if any exists in the study area. (vi) Copy of application submitted for clearance under the Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972, to the standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife.
6. Environmental Status:
(i) Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and site specific micrometeorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall.
Section 3.2, Chapter-3.
(ii) AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO and other parameters relevant to the project shall be collected. The monitoring stations shall be based CPCB guidelines and take into account the predominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests.
Detailed in chapter -3 , Section – 3.3.2.1, Table -3.7
(iii) Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all stations as per frequency given in the NAQQM Notification of Nov. 2009 along with-min., max., average and 98% values for each of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ
Detailed in chapter -3 , Section – 3.3.2.1, Table -3.7
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 40 -
stations should be provided as an annexure to the EIA Report.
(iv) Surface water quality of nearby River (100m upstream and downstream of discharge point) and other surface drains at eight locations as per CPCB/MOEF and CC guidelines.
The effluent generated from the project will be treated in zero liquid discharge plant.
(v) Whether the site falls near to polluted stretch of river identified by the CPCB/MoEF and CC, if yes give details.
No, NA
(vi) Ground water monitoring at minimum at 8 locations shall be included.
Detailed in chapter -3 , Section – 3.3.4
(vii) Noise levels monitoring at 8 locations within the study area.
Detailed in chapter -3 , Section - 3.2.2.4.3
(viii) Soil characteristics as per CPCB guidelines.
Detailed in chapter -3 , Section – 3.3.3
(ix) Traffic study of the area, type of vehicles, frequency of vehicles for transportation of materials, additional traffic due to proposed project, parking arrangement etc.,
Detailed in chapter -4 , Section – 4.3.5.1
(x) Detailed description of flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study area shall be given with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species. If Schedule-1 fauna are found within the study area, a wildlife conservation plan shall be prepared and furnished.
Detailed in chapter -3 , Section – 3.4.2 & 3.4.3.
(xi) Socio-economic status of the study area.
Detailed in chapter -3 , Section – 3.5.
7. Impact and Environment Management Plan:
(i) Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based onsite-specific meteorological features. In case the project is located on a hilly terrain, the AQIP Modelling shall be done using inputs of the specific terrain characteristics for determining the potential impacts of the project on the AAQ. Cumulative impact of all sources of emissions (including transportation) on the AAQ of the area
AAQ monitoring was conducted to assess the baseline air quality status of the study area. GLC of AAQ were estimated using industrial source complex (ISCST3) USEPA, Lakes Environmental complex terrain dispersion model based on a steady state Gaussian plume dispersion designed for point sources and short term modeling as per MOEF guidelines for the expansion project. The estimated AAQ were within permissible limits. The details are furnished in EIA report chapter 7 under section 7.5.3 Impact of air quality.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 41 -
shall be assessed. Details of the model used and the input data used for modelling shall also be provided. The air quality contours shall be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any.
(ii) Water Quality modelling – in case of discharge in water body.
We are not discharging effluent to any water body.
(iii) Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment shall be assessed and provided. In this regard, options for transport of raw materials and finished products and wastes (large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road transport or conveyor cum-rail transport shall be examined.
Detailed in Chapter 2, Section 2.7.4.
(iv) A note on treatment of wastewater from different plant operations, extent recycled and reused for different purposes shall be included. Complete scheme of effluent treatment. Characteristics of untreated and treated effluent to meet the prescribed standards of discharge under E (P) rules.
Detailed in Section 2.9.2.3, Chapter -2.
(v) Details of stack emission and action plan for control of emissions to meet standards.
Detailed in Chapter 2, Section 2.9.3.2.
(vi) Measures for fugitive emission control.
Detailed in Chapter 2, Section 2.9.3.2.
(vii) Details of hazardous waste generation and their storage, utilization and management. Copies of MOU regarding utilization of solid and hazardous waste in cement plant shall also be included. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation.
Detailed in Chapter 2, Section 2.9.3.5.
(viii) Proper utilization of fly ash shall be ensured as per Fly Ash Notification, 2009. A detailed plan of action shall be provided.
No Fly ash is generated from the industry.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 42 -
(ix) Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than 1,500 trees per ha. Giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc., shall be included. The green belt shall be around the project boundary and a scheme for greening of the roads used for the project shall also be incorporated.
Considerable area of 56066.06 sq m (i.e. 65.9 % of total plot area) of the proposed project site would be covered by green-belt. It will also nullify or stabilize the impact of pollutants which may remain beyond the scope of pollution impact assessment.
(x) Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site shall be submitted to harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also to use for the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources.
Detailed in Chapter 2, Section 2.9.4.
(xi) Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures shall be included.
Detailed in Chapter, Table 4.5.
(xii) Action plan for post-project environmental monitoring shall be submitted.
Detailed in Chapter – 6.
(xiii) Onsite and offsite Disaster (natural and man-made) Preparedness and Emergency Management Plan including Risk Assessment and damage control. Disaster management plan should be linked with District Disaster Management plan should be linked with District Disaster Management plan.
Detailed in Chapter – 7, Section 7.4.7
8. Occupational health:
I. Plan und allocation to ensure the occupational health and safety of all contract and casual workers.
Detailed in Chapter – 7, Section 7.4.7.2
II. Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker if the worker health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry, Spirometry, vision testing (Far and near vision, color vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre-placement and periodical
Employees are being examined by a team of doctors. Pre-employment medical checkup is being done for employees. Medical checkup is being done as per general and systemic parameters. All the Employees are found good condition of health.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 43 -
examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of above mentioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department wise.
Detailed is appended in annexure -4
III. Details of existing occupational and safety hazards. What are the exposure levels of hazards and whether they are within permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL, what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of the workers can be preserved.
There is a likelihood of employees being exposed to respiratory, contact, and Noise hazards due to accidental exposure to substances. All these hazards are being periodically monitored, all exposure level are within the limits PEL. Fallowing systems are in place to maintain values below PEL. 1. All the process reactors & distillation units are
provided with primary condensers circulated with water at 32 DEGC & are designed for Delta Tof 5 DEGC , sub coolers with Chilled water circulation of +10 DEG C with a Delta T of 50C, to avoid the escape of solvents into the environment and also to have the effective recoveries of 98% during distillation
2. The solid liquid separation is done under the closed condition using the special Equipment like ANFD , and The vacuum pumps are connected with Post condensers to avoid solvent vapour emission to the environment
3. Further all the Centrifuges are provided with Nitrogen Blanketing and the mother liquors are collected in tanks & pumped in closed system to ML Tanks & further to Recovery systems
4. Effective ventilation system is provided in all the work places with sufficient air changes
5. All the vents are provided with flame arrestors & further to dump tanks with over pressure & under pressure relief Valves , to avoid any leaks to working environment
6. Adequate & specific PPE are provided to avoid personal Contact while handling Chemical substances
Noise levels in all work areas are found bellow the PEL , Effective periodic maintenance is ensured and acoustic enclosures are in place
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 44 -
IV. Annual report of health status of workers with special reference to Occupational health and safety.
No special reference made to any of the workers. Annual Report attached as anneure-4
9. Corporate Environmental Policy
I.Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.
Detailed in Chapter –10, Section 10.4.
II.Does the Environment policy prescribed for standard operating process/ procedures to bring into focus any infringement/ deviation/ violation of the environmental or forest norms/ conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.
No
III.What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental clearance conditions? Details of this system may be given.
Detailed in Chapter –10, Section 10.5.1.
IV.Does the company have system of reporting of non-compliances/ violations of shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism shall be detailed in the EIA report.
The reporting of non-compliance to the top management (Board of Directors of the company and/or shareholders or stakeholders) will be through lower management, Middle management of the project.
10. Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour force during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers during operation phase.
Detailed in Chapter –4, Section 4.1.1.
11. Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC) Adequate funds (at least 2.5% of the project cost) shall be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on Public hearing issues and item wise details along with time bound action plan shall be included. Socioeconomic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
Shilpa Medicare Ltd., has defined CSR policy, & the company has allocated the funds as required under the Companies act. Number of socioeconomic development activities have been undertaken by the company for the benefit of the public (stakeholders) around the vicinity of the company in Karnataka.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 45 -
Company has contributed to the following activities to promote social activities
Ambedkar Jayanti
karnataka state Police officers Welfare Fund
karnataka state Police officers Welfare Fund
karnataka state Police officers Welfare Fund
National Education Trust
DSS Aqssociation for Celebration Ambedkar Jayathi
karnataka state Police officers Welfare Fund
towards Badmainton Club
Karnatataka Day
Social activites
Civil & Fabrication Work for Cool Water plant at Polepally Jadcherla
the prime Miniter National relief Fund
SL N College for Sponsorship Manthan
Shri Manik Prabhu Academy Blind Trust
Orphanage Childern Fees
Hanuman Temple Flooring Wal
Flooring Granite Hanuman Temple
12. Any litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of law against the project, if so, details thereof shall also be included. Has the unit received any notice under the section 5 of Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and water acts? If so, details thereof and compliance/ ATR to the notice(s) and present status of the case.
NO
13. A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TOR.
Detailed in chapter -1, Section 1.3.3
B. Specific terms of reference for EIA studies for synthetic organic chemicals industry (Dyes and Dyes intermediates; Bulk drugs and intermediates excluding drug formulations; Synthetic rubbers; Basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates)
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 46 -
1. Details on solvents to be used, measures for solvent recovery and for emissions control.
Detailed in chapter -2, Section 2.7.3
2. Details of process emissions from the proposed unit and its arrangement to control.
Detailed in chapter -2, Section 2.9.3.2
3. Ambient air quality data should include VOC, other process-specific pollutants* like NH3, chlorine, HCL, HBr, H2S, HF, etc.,(*-as applicable)
Detailed in chapter -3, Section 3.3.2.1
4. Work zone monitoring arrangements for hazardous chemicals.
1. Only sealed containers handled. 2. The hazardous chemicals are stored at
temperatures as per the prescribed storage condition
3. All containers provided with secondary containment.
4. Hazard identification & first aid methods ensured on labels.
5. High volume substances handled in closed conditions.
6. Local exhaust ventilation scrubber used while charging chemicals to the reactors.
7. Specific and adequate protection provided through PPE
8. VOC is monitored periodically 9. Adequate ventilation provided to all work
places.
5. Detailed effluent treatment scheme including segregation of effluent streams for units adopting ‘Zero’ liquid discharge.
Detailed in chapter -2, Section 2.9.2.3
6. Action plan for odor control to be submitted.
1. All the possible sources of leaks will be identified and plugged immediately with an effective Preventive maintenance schedule & Preventive maintenance schedule is in place, as per the protocol & check list is defined for each equipment & is maintained in order.
2. Odour control mechanism will be installed to bring down odorous particles for effective treatment
3. All the condensers are designed to take the vapour load during the reaction reflux & distillation & adequate cooling water by
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 47 -
Cooling towers is provided & standby circulation pumps are provided & further Existing Cooling system has adequate capacity to supply chilled water to the sub condensers to enhance condensation of vapours.& in case of any break down , standby chiller is provided.
7. A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding signed with cement manufacturers indicating clearly that solid/hazardous waste generated.
NA, we are not giving any solid/hazardous waste to cement industry.
8. Authorization/Membership for the disposal of liquid effluent in CETP and solid/hazardous waste in TSDF, if any.
Authorization/Membership for the disposal of solid/hazardous waste in TSDF is enclosed as annexure-3
9. Action plan for utilization of MEE/dryers salts.
The segregation of the sulphate salts generating effluent is being made, and MEE & ATFD is run on campaign basis, to get the pure sodium sulphate which contributes to 45% of the salts, we have plans to dispose this to the vendors. Proposal for investing about Rs.1.3 crores is being finalized for achieving the above objective.
10. Material Safety Data Sheet for all the Chemicals are being used/will be used.
Material Safety Data Sheet for all the Chemicals is enclosed as annexure- 5
11. Authorization/membership for the disposal of solid/hazardous waste in TSDF.
Authorization/Membership for the disposal of solid/hazardous waste in TSDF is enclosed as annexure-3
12. Details of incinerator if to be installed. No, NA.
13. Risk assessment for storage and handling of hazardous chemicals/solvents. Action plan for handling and safety system to be incorporated.
Detailed in chapter -7, Section 7.4
1 14. Arrangements for ensuring health and safety of workers engaged in handling of toxic materials.
Detailed in chapter -7, Section 7.4
Additional TORs for EIA studies: 1. Quantification of the each product and
raw material. Detailed in Chapter -2 section 2.7.4
2. Explore the possibility to remove chloroform and Sulphur dioxide.
Presently Chloroform and Sulphur dioxide are not used in process.
3. No. of products and No. of reactors provided with justification.
Detailed in Chapter -2 section 2.7.5
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 48 -
4. Material balance and mass balance for all the products.
Detailed in Chapter -2 section 2.7.2
5. Raw material to product and product to waste generation ratio for each product to be given.
Detailed in Chapter -2 section 2.7.2 (A)
6. Impact on the adjacent Industry/agriculture land due to this activity.
Worst case scenario analysis has revealed that there is no Impact on the adjacent Industries, Refer Dwg. Detailed in section 7.4.4.1 and , Dow Fire & Explosive Index for one worst case Reduction process , and Hydrogenation Process is detailed in section 2.7.4.5, Chapter-2 and Severity mapping for Solvent tank farm Detailed in section 7.4.4.1
7. Greenbelt details with design to be provided.
The industry is designed with utmost consideration to the environment. A total area of 58,755.16 sq m i.e. 65.9 % of the total plot area is reserved exclusively for green-belt/landscape development.
8. Storage and safety measures taken in the hydrogenation process to be explained in EIA.
1. Considering the Hazardous nature of the
process the Unit is Separated from the Main
manufacturing block
2. Prior to the start of the process , the integrity of the Reactor is checked & certified
3. Before starting the hydrogenation Process inertisation is ensured by alternating cycles of Vacuum & Nitrogen
4. The system is Provided with safety relief Valve & Rupture Disk , Both these connected to a dump tank with water seal , the dump tank is provided with the flame arrester
5. High Pressure & High Temperature alarms are Provided on the equipment
6. Sensitive Hydrogen leak Detectors are provided near the reactor and Manifold
7. Flash Back arrestor in the manifold to the reactor
8. Close system sampling is done & the system is flushed with the water
9. Evacuation of Hydrogen is done through the dump tank gradually in over one hour
10. Filtration is done in the closed Pressure nutch filter & is done with the nitrogen pressure
9. Raney nickel is to be replaced with palladium/carbon in the hydrogenation process.
The Developed Process is robust & safe & safe The Process of Reduction of CN Group to CH2 NH2 is found to be catalyst sensitive and found working with smoothly with Raney Nickle Catalyst ,
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 49 -
The experiments Conducted in our R&D has demonstrated that PD/Charcoal is not suitable catalyst , the reaction is incomplete & is not progressing However efforts will be made to eliminate the Raney nickle with other low volume catalysts , where ever suitable .
10. Unit performance of the treatment plants available.
Unit performance of the Effluent plant:
S. No
Name of the Equipment
Designed efficiency %
Present Efficiency %
1 Stripper COD Stripping
95% 95%
2 Multiple Effect evaporator
98% 98%
3 Aeration Tank-1
50 to 55 %
53%
4 Aeration Tank-2
75 to 78 %
75%
5 Aeration Tank-3
95 to 96 %
95%
6 HRCC secondary clarifier
5 % 5%
7 UF Ro permeate to Reject
70 % 70%
11. In the monitoring protocols of the ambient air, VOC to be incorporated.
In the monitoring protocols of the ambient air, VOC is incorporated and detailed in section 3.3.2.1, Chapter -2.
12. Solvent storage and solvent recovery scheme to be explained.
Detailed in chapter – 2, section 2.7.3.2.
13. Green chemistry adopted in the process to be highlighted.
The Company is investing in Continuous Flow reactors about 3 crores is being invested &is exploring the possibility of Minimizing the waste generating during the reaction by way of losses , & recycling the all the recyclable materials , Like catalysts & byproducts
14. List of banned chemicals to be provided
with alternative chemicals to replace the banned chemicals.
We are not using any banned chemicals.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 50 -
1.4 GENERIC STRUCTURE OF EIA DOCUMENT:
This EIA report presents the existing baseline scenario and the assessment and evaluation of the
environmental impacts that may rise during the construction and operational phases of the
project. This report also highlights the Environmental Monitoring Program during the
construction and operation phases of the project and the post project monitoring program. In
terms of the EIA Notification of the MoEF dated 14th September 2006 as amended Dec. 2009, the
generic structure of the EIA document will be as under:
Chapter 1: Introduction
Introductory information is presented in this Chapter. The introduction provides a Background
to the project and describes the objective of this document. This Chapter also includes the outline
of the project and its proponent. The purpose and organization of the report is also presented in
this chapter.
Chapter 2: Project Description
This Chapter includes Project Description and Infrastructure Facilities delineating all industrial
and environmental aspect of the industry of M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented
Unit, Unit –II Construction and operation phase activities as well as process details of proposed
scenario. This Chapter gives information about storage and handling, water and wastewater
quantitative details, air pollution and control system, sludge storage facility, utilities, greenbelt
and safety measures for proposed plant.
Chapter 3: Description of the Environment
This Chapter provides Baseline Environmental Status of Environmental components (Primary
data) delineating meteorological details of the project site and surrounding area.
Chapter 4: Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures
This Chapter presents the analysis of impacts on the environmental and social aspects of the
project as a result of establishment of plan and thereby suggesting the mitigation measures.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 51 -
Chapter 5: Analysis of Alternatives
This chapter includes the justification for the selection of the project site from Environmental
point of view as well as from economic point of view so that the technology will be affordable to
the member units of the industrial area.
Chapter 6: Environmental Monitoring Plan
This chapter will include the technical aspects of monitoring, the effectiveness of mitigation
measures which will include the measurement methodologies, frequency, location, data analysis,
reporting schedules etc.,
Chapter 7: Additional Studies
This chapter will detail about the Public Consultation sought regarding the project. It will also
identify the risks of the Project in relation to the general public and the surrounding environment
during construction and operation of the plant and thereby presents Disaster Management Plan.
Chapter 8 & 9: Project Benefits & Environmental Cost Benefit Analysis.
The realization of the project activity is envisaged to impart benefits to the areas in concern. This
Chapter will identify the benefits from the project and summarize them.
Chapter 10: Environmental Management Plan
It is the key Chapter of the report and presents the mitigation plan, covers the institutional and
monitoring requirements to implement environmental mitigation measures and to assess their
adequacy during project implementation.
Chapter 11: Summary and Conclusion
This chapter summarizes the information given in Chapters in this EIA/EMP report and the
conclusion based on the environmental study, impact identification, mitigation measures and the
environmental management plan.
Chapter 12: Disclosure of the Consultant
Names of consultants engaged in the preparation of the EIA/EMP report along with their brief
resume and nature of Consultancy rendered are included in this Chapter.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 52 -
2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT
The main activity of the industry is manufacturing of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) &
Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity.
2.2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT
The need for the project is detailed in Section 1.2.2, Chapter 1 of this report.
2.3 LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED INDUSTRY
The Expansion and Modification of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats
manufacturing industry with R & D activity manufacturing industry is located at Unit –II, Plot No.
33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134,
Raichur Dist, Karnataka. Google map is appended as fig 2.1A.
CHAPTER 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 53 -
Fig 2.0: Maps showing project boundary & project site location
Note:
Latitude: 16°18'38.31"N; Longitude: 77°21'23.81"E 357 m above MSL;
Table: - 2.0 Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four corners of the site
Sl.No. Directions Co- ordinates
1 North East Latitude: 16°18'44.22"N; Longitude: 77°21'23.67"E
2 North West Latitude: 16°18'42.20"N; Longitude: 77°21'19.34"E
3 South East Latitude: 16°18'33.56"N; Longitude: 77°21'27.26"E
4 South West Latitude: 16°18'35.91"N; Longitude: 77°21'17.73"E
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 54 -
2.4 SIZE OR MAGNITUDE OF OPERATION
The industry “M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II” is a Large scale industrial unit with a total capital investment of Sixty Crores Forty Lakhs only. The total production capacity proposed is 422.415 MT/Annum.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 55 -
The total production capacity is 4,22,415 kg/annum.
The total capital investment on the project is Rs. 60.40 Crores only; the details of which are
appended in the following table 2.1.
Table: 2.1 - Total Cost of theproject
Sl. no.
Cost of Rs. (Lakhs)
1 Building 1000.00
2 Plant & machinery 5000.00
3 Pollution control systems 40.00
Rupees TOTAL 6040.00
2.5 PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR APPROVAL & IMPLEMENTATION
The time schedule for completion of the proposed project is given in the following table 2.2.
Table 2.2:- time schedule for completion of the proposed
Particulars Time schedule
Approval May, 2017
Civil works July, 2017
Erection & installation of machinery October, 2017
Completion March, 2018
2.6 PROPOSED LAYOUT PLAN
The proposed layout plan clearly demarcating various units within the plant and the boundaries
with land use pattern is provided in fig 2.1 and table 2.3 respectively.
Table 2.3:- Land-use pattern
Sl. No.
Particulars Existing Area (SQM)
Proposed Area (SQM)
After Expansion
(SQM)
Area in percentage
(%)
1 Total plot area 84,984.00 - 84,984.00 100
2 Ground coverage area 16769.9 2689.1 19459 22.89
3 Landscape/Green-belt area
58755.16 - 56066.06 65.9
4 Hard paved area 9458.94 - 9458.94 11.21
5 Built-up area 25803.4 5124.1 30927.5 -
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 56 -
“M/s. Shilpa Medicare Ltd.,” has entered into a lease agreement with KIADB & a copy of the lease deed is is submitted earlier during ToR time. SITE BEARINGS: The proposed project site is surrounded by vacant plots/industries in all
directions. Details are shown in the below table.
Table 2.4: List of surrounding major industries
List of Surrounding Major Industries
Sl.No. Name of the Industry Type of Industry Direction Distance in Km
1 Raichem Medicare (P) Ltd Pharmaceutical North 0.5
2 Trimax industry (P) ltd Pharmaceutical North west
0.5
3 Vibrant pharma Bulk drug industry South 0.4
4 Surana Industry Iron industry(Closed) East 0.5
5 Laksmi venkateswara ginning & presser
ginning & pressing mill West Adjacent
The proposed layout plan of the project with various components is appended as fig 2.1.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 57 -
Fig. 2.1: Layout plan
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 58 -
Fig. 2.1 A Plant Photos.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 59 -
2.7 TECHNOLOGY & PROCESS DESCRIPTION
2.7.1 PRODUCTS MANUFACTURED
The following APIs & intermediates are proposed to be manufactured is detailed in table 2.5 & 2.6.
Table 2.5: Existing Products
Sl.No. Existing Product Name Manufacturing Qty in MT/Annum
1 Ambroxyl Hcl 47
2 Anatrazole 0.1
3 Gemcitabine Hcl 0.1
4 Paclitaxel 0.1
5 Temezdomide 0.1
6 Bicalutamide 0.5
7 Irinotecon Hcl Trihydrate 0.1
8 Cisplatin 0.1
9 Carboplatin 0.35
10 Co-Enzyme Q10 18
11 Docetaxel Trihydrate 0.1
12 Oxoplatin 0.05
13 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
60
14 Total 126.8
Table: - 2.6 The API’s & Intermediates Proposed To Be Manufactured
S.NO Existing Product Name Manufacturing Qty as per CFO in
MT/Year
Proposed Product Name
Manufacturing Qty in MT/Year
1 Ambroxyl Hcl 47 Ambroxol HCl 10
2 Anatrazole 0.1 Anasrozole 0.1
3 Gemcitabine Hcl 0.1 Gemcitabine HCl 0.1
4 Paclitaxel 0.1 Paclitaxel 0.1
5 Temozolabide 0.1 Temozolabide 0.1
6 Bicalutamide 0.5 Bicalutamide 0.5
7 Irinotecon Hcl Trihydrate 0.1 Docetaxel Trihydrate 0.1
8 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
60 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
60
9 Cisplatin (To be deleted )
0.1 Bendamustine hcl 0.2
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 60 -
10 Carboplatin (To be deleted )
0.35 Bortzomib 0.005
11 Co-Enzyme Q10 (To be deleted )
18 Capacitabine 60
12 Docetaxel Trihydrate (To be deleted )
0.1 Imatinib 5
13 Oxoplatin (To be deleted )
0.05 Lenalidomide 0.5
14 Letrozole 0.05
15 PMD 0.25
16
Decitabine 0.01
17 Cytrabine 0.05
18 Cabazitaxel 0.01
19 Acebrophylline 10
20 Cloferabine 0.01
21 Melphalan 0.025
22 Cyclophosphamide 1
23 Tenfovir 50
24 PMK 0.25
25 Erlotonib 2
26 Emtricitabine 1
27 Dimethyl fumarate 12
28 Elvitegravir 1
29 Cobicistat 100
30 Busulfan 0.05
31 Zoledranic Acid 0.005
32 Tranexamic Acid 100
33 Sunitinib Malate 3
34 Sorafenib Tosylate 3
35 Abiraterone acetate 2
Total 126.8
422.415
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 61 -
2.7.2 DETAILED MANUFACTURING PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The manufacturing process for typical product proposed to be produced is described with stoichiometric and gravimetric balances along with process description and material balance flow charts as under.
The manufacturing process for all the products proposed to be produced is submitted during TOR time in pre feasibity report.
REACTION SCHEME
1.Ambroxol HCl
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 62 -
PROCESS FLOW CHART
2-amino-3,5-dibromo benzaldehyde 342 kg
Trans -4- amino cyclohexanol
214 kg
Methanol
2565 kg
Sodium borohydride
65 kg
Water 400 kg
Carbon 4 kg
SS Reactor
Centrifuge
SS Reactor
Acetone
2376 kg Carbon 4 kg
Drier
Ambroxol HCl 500 kg
Filter
GL Reactor
Hydrochloric acid 128 kg
1st stage
Ambroxol HCl base 458 kg
Centrifuge
2nd stage
Distillation
Solvent methanol recovered from reaction
2536 kg
loss 29 kg
Process wastewater 562 kg
Solvent acetone recovered from
reaction 2347 kg
loss
49.0 kg
Slurry
Water
20 kg
Process wastewater 67 kg
Mother liquor
Centrifuge
Dillute Hcl 81 kg
Ambroxol HCl
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 63 -
PROCEDURE
The process involves 2 steps.
1st stage 2-amino-3,5-dibromobenzaldehyde is condensed with trans-4-amino cyclohexanol in the presence of solvent methanol to get trans-4-[(2-amino-3,5-dibromobenzyl)amino] cyclohexanol of ambroxol hydrochloride. The above trans-4-[(2-amino-3,5-dibromobenzyl)amino] cyclohexanol on reaction with sodium borohydride & in the presence of water forms ambroxol HCl base. 2nd stage Ambroxol base is converted into crude ambroxol HCl in the presence of acetone and carbon which is then purified to get ambroxol HCl pharma grade. HCl is used for pH adjustment. Cycle time
Particulars Time (hrs)
1st stage 2nd stage
Reaction 24 – 26 10 - 12
Isolation and centrifugation 4 – 6 4 - 6
Solvent recovery 8 – 10 8 – 10
Total process time 36 – 42 22 - 28
Materail Balance
Stage - I
Input Qty/batch (kg)
Reactors Output Qty/batch (kg)
2 amino 3,5 dibromo benzaldehyde
342 SS Reactor
Output from 1st stage 458
Solvent methanol
recovered from reaction 2536
Trans -4- amino cyclohexanol 214 loss 29
Sodium borohydride 64
Methanol 2565
Water 400 Process wastewater 562
Total input 3585 Total output 3585
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 64 -
Stage - II
Input Qty/batch (kg)
Reactors Output Qty/batch (kg)
Output from 1st stage 458 SS Reactor
Ambroxol HCl 500
Acetone 2376 Carbon 4
Hydrochloric acid 128 Solvent acetone
recovered from reaction 2347
loss 29
Carbon 4 GL Reactor
Diluted HCl 81
Water 20 Process wastewater 25
Total input 2986 Total output 2986
Applications Ambroxol is a secretolytic agent used in the treatment of respiratory diseases associated with viscid or excessive mucus. It is the active ingredient of Mucosolvan, Lasolvan or Mucoangin. The substance is a mucoactive drug with several properties including secretolytic and secretomotoric actions that restore the physiological clearance mechanisms of the respiratory tract which play an important role in the body’s natural defence mechanisms. It stimulates synthesis and release of surfactant by type II pneumocytes. Surfactants acts as an anti-glue factor by reducing the adhesion of mucus to the bronchial wall, in improving its transport and in providing protection against infection and irritating agents. Ambroxol is indicated as “secretolytic therapy in bronchopulmonary diseases associated with abnormal mucus secretion and impaired mucus transport. It promotes mucus clearance, facilitates expectoration and eases productive cough, allowing patients to breathe freely and deeply. Ambroxol also provides pain relief in acute sore throat. Pain in sore throat is the hallmark of acute pharyngitis. Sore throat is usually caused by a viral infection. The infection is self limited and the patient recovers normally after a few days. What is most bothering for the patient is the continuous pain in the throat maximized when the patient is swallowing. The main goal of treatment is thus to reduce pain. The main property of Ambroxol for treating sore throat is the local anaesthetic effect, described first in the late 1970s, but explained and confirmed in more recent work. Ambroxol is a very potent inhibitor of the neuronal Na+ channels. This property led to the development of a lozenge containing 20 mg of ambroxol. Many state-of-the-art clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of Ambroxol in relieving pain in acute sore throat, with a fast onset of action and a long duration of effect of at least 3 hours. Additional anti-inflammatory properties of Ambroxol are of clinical relevance since treatment lead to a marked reduction of redness of the patient’s sore throat.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 65 -
REACTION SCHEME
2. Anastrozole
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 66 -
PROCESS FLOW CHART
1st stage
,,,,-tetramethyl-5-(methyl)-1,3- benzenedi- acetonitrile
4 kg
Acetonitrile 15 kg
Water
5 kg
Output from 1st stage
4 kg
N- bromosuccianmide
3.3 kg
Distillation
GL Reactor
Ethyl acetate 15 kg
Centrifuge Centrifuge
Drying
Layer separation Process wastewater 6 kg
Hydrobromic acid - succinamide 2.3 kg scrubbung
Organic layer
Acetonitrile recovered 14 kg
loss 1 kg
Reaction mass Cyclohexane
2.5 kg
Distillation
Cyclohexane recovered 2.25 kg
loss 0.25 kg
Ethyl acetate recovered 14 kg
loss 1 kg
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 67 -
2nd stage
Process wastewater
6 kg
1,2,4-triazole
1.25 kg
GL Reactor
Sodium corbonate carbonate
2.5 kg
Centrifuge Centrifuge
Output from 1st stage
4 kg
Output from 2nd stage
2.25 kg
Acetone
20 kg
Drying
Distillation
Ethyl acetate
5 kg
HCl
0.25 kg
Sodium chloride
1.25 kg water mix
GL Reactor
Filter
Acetone recovered 17 kg
loss 3 kg
Ethyl acetate recovered 4 kg
loss 1 kg
Water
2 kg
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 68 -
3rd stage
Sodium carbonate
1 kg
Anastrozole
1 kg
GL Reactor
Ethyl acetate 5 kg
Ethyl acetate layer
Layer separation
Distillation
Water
5 kg
Output from 2nd stage
2.25 kg
Cyclohexane
2.5 kg
Centrifuge Centrifuge
Drying
Process wastewater 6 kg
Sodium chloride water mix
1.25 kg
Ethyl acetate recovered 4.5 kg
loss 0.5 kg
Reaction mass
Distillation
Cyclohexane recovered 2.25 kg
loss 0.25 kg
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 69 -
PROCEDURE
The process involves 3 steps.
1st stage
,,,, tetra methyl-5-(methyl)-1,3-benzene diacetontrile is charged in acetonitrile. N-bromosuccinimide is then added to the reaction mass & heated to 50 – 600 C for 4 hrs to complete the reaction. Then the product is extracted in ethyl acetate followed by washing with water. Ethyl acetate is distilled and product (1st stage) is crystallized in cyclohexane, centrifuged and dried to get the output from 1st stage. 2nd stage
The output from 1st stage is dissolved in acetone to which potassium carbonate and 1,2,4 triazole are added at 40 – 500 C for 2 hrs to complete the reaction. Potassium bromide salt formed is filtered; acetone is distilled to get the residue. Ethyl acetate is added to dissolve completely. Anastrozole hydrochloride is formed by adding hydrochloric acid which is cooled and filtered to get HCl salt of anastrozole. 3rd stage
Anastrozole hydrochloride is basified in water and sodium carbonate. It is then extracted in ethyl
acetate, & then washed with water. Ethyl acetate is separated and distilled and the product is
isolated by adding cyclohexane. The product is then centrifuged and dried to get pure
anastrozole.
Cycle time
Particulars Time (hrs)
1st stage 2nd stage 3rd stage
Reaction 8 - 10 6 – 8 6 – 8
Isolation & centrifugation 8 - 12 6 – 8 8 - 12
Solvent recovery 1 - 2 2 - 3 1 - 2
Total process time 17 - 24 14 - 19 15 - 22
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 70 -
Materail Balance
Stage – I
Input Qty/batch (kg)
Reactors Output Qty/batch (kg)
a,a,a,a,-tetramethyl-5-(methyl)-1,3- benzenedi- acetonitrile
4 GL Reactor Output from 1st stage 4
Hydrobromic acid – succinamide scrubing
2.3
Solvent
1) Ethyl acetate
recovered from reaction 14
loss 1
2) Cyclohexane
Acetonitrile 15 recovered from reaction 2.25
N- bromosuccianmide
3.3 loss 0.25
3) Acetonitrile
Ethyl acetate 15 recovered from reaction 14
Water 5 loss 1
Cyclohexane 2.5 GL Reactor Process wastewater 6
Total input 44.8 Total output 44.8
Stage – II
Input Qty/batch (kg)
Reactors Output Qty/batch (kg)
Output from 1st stage 4 GL Reactor
Output from 2nd stage 2.25
ØSodium chloride 1.25
1,2,4-triazole 1.25 Solvent
Sodiumcorbonate carbonate
2.5 1) Acetone
Acetone 20 Ø recovered from reaction 17
Water 2 Ø loss 3
Ethyl acetate 5 2) Ethyl acetate
Hydrochloric acid 0.25 Ø recovered from reaction 4
Ø loss 1
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 71 -
GL Reactor
Process wastewater 6
Total 35 Total output 35
Stage –III
Input Qty/batch (kg)
Reactors Output Qty/batch (kg)
Output from 2nd stage 2.25 GL Reactor
Anastrozole 1
2 no.s sodium chloride water mix 1.25
Water 5 Solvent
Sodium carbonate 1 1) Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acetate 5 recovered from reaction 4.5
Cyclohexane 2.5 loss 0.5
2) Cyclohexane
recovered from reaction 2.25
loss 0.25
Process wastewater 6
Total input 15.75 Total output 15.75
Applications
Anastrozole (Arimidex®) is a prescription medication used to treat breast cancer in
postmenopausal women. Specific anastrozole uses include treating postmenopausal women
with:
Early breast cancer that is hormone receptor-positive. It is used after breast cancer surgery with or without radiation. This is known as adjuvant therapy, or treatment that is used to help prevent the cancer from returning (see Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer).
Advanced or metastatic breast cancer that is either hormone receptor-positive or the hormone receptor status is not known.
Advanced breast cancer that has not responded to tamoxifen (Nolvadex®, Soltamox®).
Note:-Detailed manufacturing process details with gravemetric balance chart & process flow chart of all products is submitted in pre feasibility report during TOR time. Now only two products typical process details is shown above.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 72 -
2.7.3 RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION/RECYCLING AND RE-USE ENVISAGED IN THE INDUSTRY
2.7.3.1 SOLVENT RECOVERY & RE-USE
Various solvents are proposed to be used during the process of manufacture of APIs &
Intermediates. The solvents proposed to be recovered and recycled during the process of
manufacture of each product are detailed in table 2.7.
Table 2.7: Solvent recovery
S. No
Name of the Product
Stage Name of the solvent
Solvent Kg (Per Batch)
Used Recovered Loss
1 Ambroxol HCl I Methanol 2565 2536 29
II Acetone 2376 2347 29
2 Anastrozole
I
Acetonitrile 15 14 1
Ethyl acetate 15 14 1
Cyclohexane 2.5 2.25 0.25
II Acetone 20 17 3
Ethyl acetate 5 4 1
III Ethyl acetate 5 4.5 0.5
Cyclohexane 2.5 2.25 0.25
3 Gemcitabine HCl
I Methanol 117 111 6
II Methanol 90 84 6
III Acetic acid 240 237 3
4 Paclitaxel
I
Methanol 15.6 15 0.6
Ethyl acetate 22.5 22 0.5
II
MDC 17.45 54 0
Acetone 5.27
Petroleum ether 32.7
III Methanol 9.36 8 1.36
IV
MDC 4.85 4.5 0.35
Acetone 1.38 8.9 0.18
Petroleum ether 7.7
5 Temozolomide I -- -- -- --
II Acetone 16 15.4 0.6
6 Bicalutamide I Acetonitrile 100 97 3
IPA 10 8 2
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 73 -
7 Docetaxel trihydrate
I Acetonitrile 20 14 6
Ethyl acetate 30 26 4
II
MDC 24 20 4
Acetone 24 22 2
Petroleum ether 60 54 6
III Methanol 24 20 4
8 3a,7B-Dihydroxy
Cholanic Acid
I Methanol 952.4 948.6 3.8
II Ethyl acetate 1071.4 1065.5 5.95
III -- -- -- --
IV 2M enol 3809.5 3807.61 1.9
V MDC 512 504.6 7.4
VI Butanol 4523.8 4516.2 7.6
9 Bendamustine HCl I -- -- -- --
10 Bortezomib
I MDC 0.2 0.15 0.05
II Methanol , EA 0.45 2.3 2.7
n-Heptane 2 1.5 0.5
III Methanol 0.039 0.039 0
11 Capecitabine
I
Toluene 30 29 1
MDC 50 49 1
Isopropyl alcohol 50 50 0
II MDC 25 25 0
Heptane 50 50 0
III
Toluene 90 89 1
MDC 25 24 1
Methanol 35 34 1
12 Imatinib mesylate I MDC 100 100 0
Methanol 50 50 0
13 Lenalidomide I Dimethyl sulphoxide
5 4.9 0.1
14 Letrozole
I Aceto niotrile 15 14.5 0.5
Hexane 3 2.5 0.3
II Ethyl acetate 10 9.5 0.5
DMF 3 2.7 0.3
15 Pemetrexed disodium I
MDC 38.5 36.8 1.7
DMF 10.2 9.5 0.7
II -- -- -- --
III Acetone 30.8 30 0.8
16 Dicitabine I Methanol 60.8 60 0.8
II MDC 121.6 100 21.6
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 74 -
III MDC 203 160 43
HMDS 23 18.5 4.5
IV -- -- -- --
V Methanol 76 44 32
17 Cytrabine I
DMF 20 20 0
Methanol 25 25 0
II
t-butylamine 0.18 0 0.18
Methanol 2.15 0 2.15
18 Cabazitaxel
I
DMF 2.19 0 2.19
Methanol 18.43 0 18.43
Diisopropyl ether 21.02 21.02 0
Tetrahydrofuran 8.86 8.86 0
Acetone 1.57 1.57 0
II
Ethyl acetate 21.45 21.45 0
Ethanol 9.16 9.16 0
Hexanes 5.58 5.58 0
III
Diisopropyl ether 30.97 30.97 0
Methanol 4.63 4.63 0
IV Methanol 16.28 16.28 0
19 Acebrophylline
I Methanol 910 895 15
II DMF 1065 0 15
Hexanes 5350 5330 10
20 Clofarabine
I Ethyl Acetate 30.98 0 30.98
Hexane 15.61 0 15.61
II Methanol 34.8 0 34.8
III Hexane 38.6 32 6.6
Ethyl Acetate 24.11 20 4.11
IV Methanol 46.28 0 46.28
21 Melphlan HCl
I Acetic Acid 164.6 152 12.6
II MDC 50 40 10
Ethyl Acetate 63.6 50 13.6
III Methanol 100 80 20
MDC 48 30 18
IV
Toluene 23 18 5
MDC 1024 1020 4
Methanol 2.6 1.5 1.1
1-Heptane 396.2 390 6.2
22 Cyclophosphamide I
Toluene 6.85 5 1.85
Acetone 5.43 5.2 0.23
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 75 -
II
Toluene 13.08 12.8 2.08
n-Heptane 10.34 8.2 2.14
III
MDC 37.23 36.8 0.43
Ethyl Acetate 36.8 35.8 1
n-hexane 13.14 12.2 0.94
23 Tenofovir
I
DMF 3850 3700 150
MDC 21900 21890 10
1,2-Propylene carbonate 520 520 10
II
Acetonitrile 750 740 10
MDC 1050 940 10
24 Pemetrexed dipotassium
I
MDC 1506.6 1506.6 0
DMF 39.9 32 7.9
II Ethanol 18.94 10 8.94
Ethanol 37.9 28.5 9.4
25
Erlotinib
I Ethyl Acetate 690 630 60
Hexane 200 190 10
II
Toluene 350 345 5
Ethyl Acetate 175 190 5
Toluene 2560 2580 10
IV IPA 32.5 32.5 0
26 Emtricitabine
I
DMF 400 380 20
Dichloromethane 7792.5 7713 79
Hexane 2262.5 2150 113
Tri ethyl amine 437.5 415 21
Ethyl acetate 240 228 12
Toluene 1382.5 1313 69.5
Acetonitrile 2510 2385 125
II
Ethanol 3655 3550 105
Ethyl acetate 2900 2250 650
1-Propanol 2600 2525 75
27 Dimethyl Fumarate
I Methanol 2222.182 2199.8 22.2
II Methanol 5333.33 5300 33.33
28 Elvitegravir
I
Toluene 773.178 695 78
Iso Propyl Alcohol 1030.904 928 104
n-Heptane 1546.356 1392 154
MDC 1030.904 927.8 102
II
THF 1288.63 1160 129
MDC 1700.991 1530 170
IPA 850.4957 766 85
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 76 -
n-Heptane 1133.994 1020 113
III
THF 3827.231 3444.508 383
n-Heptane 2577.26 2319.534 257.31
Ethyl acetate 1288.63 1159.767 129
IV Toluene 1340.175 1206 134
n-Heptane 1608.21 1447 161
V Toluene 2063.87 1857 207
IPA 247.4169 222 25
VI IPA 96.48 2238 249
29 Busulfan I Acetone 26.3 21.3 5
II Acetone 99.2 86.7 12.5
30 Cobocistat
I
Toluene 11.01 9 2.01
Ethyl Acetate 63.25 59.5 3.75
Heptane 10.75 6.8 3.95
THF 7.31 7.31 0
Acetic Acid 12.65 12 0.65
II Toluene 61.63 54.03 7.6
MDC 47.11 35.11 12
III MDC 142.58 120.58 22
THF 108.64 81.64 27
IV IPA 20.76 20.76 0
V MDC 70.04 55 15.04
VI
MDC 43.35 31.35 12
Acetone 24.4 18.4 6
Ethanol 4.29 0 4.29
VII MDC 89.18 89.18 0
HEptane 73.82 73.82 0
31 Zolodranic Acid
I
Isopropyl alcohol (IPA)
17.2 14 3.2
MDC 24.6 18 6.6
Triethylamine (TEA) 10.34 9.1 1.24
II Methanol 10.2 7.5 2.7
Acetone 11.8 9.2 2.6
III Chlorobenzene 7.3 6 1.3
Acetone 78 72 6
32 Tranexamic acid V Acetone 1401 1401 0
33 Sunitinib Malate I
Toluene 6.58 5.92 0.66
DCM 45.47 45.47 0
1 Mixed solvent(toline,hexane
34.73 25.5 9.23
II Methanol 16.79 13.43 3.36
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 77 -
III MEK 13.23 10.58 2.65
34 Sorafenib Tosylate I DCM 4 1.5 2.5
35 Abiraterone acetate
Toluene 25.2 24.5 0.7
Hexane 9.53 7.5 2.5
II Methil ethyl ketone 33.7 24 9.7
III Methil ethyl ketone 16.4 14 2.4
I Ethanol 789 789 0
II
MDC 1584 1492 92
Methanol 158.4 0 158.4
IPA 550.2 550.2 0
III IPA 360.1 360.1 0
IV MDC 792 396 396
N.Hexane 52.4 31.44 20.96
IVPurification
Acetone 795.2 707.6 66.8
MDC 633.6 316.8 316.8
N-Hexane 104.8 31.44 74.98
Ethanol 410.5 410 0
124222.9566 119512.988 5974.51
Note: * The solvent lost during the process of solvent distillation is mainly due to organic thermal disintegration and in form of residue left behind from the bottom un-distilled product.
2.7.3.2. STORAGE OF SOLVENTS
Solvents like Toluene and Methanol will be received in tankers. The same will be stored in above
ground storage tanks. The solvent storage tanks shall be provided with Dykes. The storage tanks
will be provided with condensers to prevent fugitive emissions, and flame arrestors. The solvents
will be transferred to production blocks by pipelines. Highly volatile solvents like Ethylene
dichloride will be received in drums (MS\HDPE). The same will be stored on a platform provided
with Concrete floor and collection pits. The solvents will be transported to production block by
means of drum trolley.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 78 -
I. DETAILS OF BULK STORAGE OF SOLVENTS, SAFETY MEASURES, EVAPORATION LOSS
PREVENTION AND CONTROL.
SN SOLVENT MODE OF STORAGE
SAFETY SYSTEMS
MEASURES TO AVOID LOSS AND CONTROL OF EVAPORATION
1. METHYLENE CHLORIDE
DRUMS No dispensing in storage area. Secondary containment Spill and leak control kit Organic vapour detectors Stored at 200C
No dispensing of solvent is carried out in storage area. Required quantities are issued in sealed drums.
2. 2-ETHOXY BENZOYL CHLORIDE
DRUMS No dispensing in storage area. Secondary containment Spill and leak control kit Organic vapour detectors
No dispensing of solvent is carried out in storage area. Required quantities are issued in sealed drums.
3. n-METHYL PIPERAZINE
DRUMS No dispensing in storage area. Secondary containment Spill and leak control kit Organic vapour detectors
No dispensing of solvent is carried out in storage area. Required quantities are issued in sealed drums.
4. 2-METHOXY ETHANOL
DRUMS No dispensing in storage area. Secondary containment Spill and leak control kit Organic vapour detectors
No dispensing of solvent is carried out in storage area. Required quantities are issued in sealed drums.
5. METHANOL ABOVE GROUND
Breather valve followed by flame arrester.
Enclosed dispensing system. Pumps with double mechanical seal.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 79 -
Non contact level indicator.
6. TOLUENE ABOVE GROUND
Breather valve followed by flame arrester. Non contact level indicator.
Enclosed dispensing system. Pumps with double mechanical seal.
7. HEXANE. ABOVE GROUND
Breather valve followed by flame arrester. Non contact level indicator.
Enclosed dispensing system. Pumps with double mechanical seal.
8. ACETIC ACID ABOVE GROUND
Breather valve followed by flame arrester. Non contact level indicator.
Enclosed dispensing system. Pumps with double mechanical seal.
9. ACETIC AN HYDRIDE.
ABOVE GROUND
Breather valve followed by flame arrester. Non contact level indicator.
Enclosed dispensing system. Pumps with double mechanical seal.
2.7.3.3 SOLVENT RECOVERY SYSTEM
After the reaction is complete the solvents are recovered in a distillation unit. The distillation unit has two condensers in series (shell and tube type). The first condenser is passed with chilled cooling tower water at 7-12 oC, while the second
condenser will be passed with chilled brine solution at -10 - 200 C as coolants. After the vapors are condensed, the condensate along with un-condensed vapors is
passed through a trap which is cooled externally with chilled water. The vents of condenser and receiver are connected to scrubber system. All the reaction vessels and centrifuges are connected to a common line. These fumes and
exhausts are sucked by ID fan and scrubbed by alkali solution. The air after scrubbing is let out into the atmosphere and the scrubbed water is sent to
ETP for further treatment. This wet scrubber absorbs acidic vapors, traces of solvents etc. and purified gas stream is
let out into the atmosphere.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 80 -
Fig 2.2 Typical solvent recovery system
The details of different by-products generated during the process of manufacture of APIs & intermediates are given in the following table
Table: - 2.8 Quantity of by-products generated in kg
S. No
Name of the Product
Stage
By Product Quantity No. of
Batches/ month
By Product
generated Qty per
Month
By Product
generated Qty per
Year
Method of disposal
1 3a,7B-
Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
II potasium acetate
595 20 11900 142800 Proposed to sale
IV Caustic potash lye solution
711.35 20 14227 170724 Proposed to sale
2 Capacitabine I Tin salt 20 50 1000 12000 Proposed to sale
II Pyridine Hcl
6.4 50 320 3840 Proposed to sale
3 Decitabine II Pyridine HCl 40.4 1.7 68.68 824.16 Proposed to sale
Condenser 2
Condenser 1
Chilled water
Cooling tower water
Distillation
column
Receiver
To scrubber
Recovered solvent
Residue to storage
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 81 -
2.7.4 RAW MATERIALS REQUIRED
2.7.4.1 QUANTITY REQUIREMENT
The raw materials required for the manufacture of Aromatic Chemicals are appended in the table
2.9 below. Raw materials as listed will be procured as per the production requirement.
Table 2.9: Raw materials requirement
Sl. No.
Product Raw materials Quantity required Solvents required
after recycling
kg/annum
Kg/Batch Kg/Month Kg/Annum
Active Parmaceauticals Ingradiants (API’S)
1
AMBROXYL HCL
2 amino 3,5 dibromo benzaldehyde
342 581.4 6976.8
Trans -4- amino cyclohexanol
214 363.8 4365.6
Sodium borohydride 64 108.8 1305.6
Methanol 2565 4360.5 52326 69
Acetone 2376 4039.2 48470.4 69
Hydrochloric acid 128 217.6 2611.2
Activated Carbon 43 73.1 877.2
2 amino 3,5 dibromo benzaldehyde
342 581.4 6976.8
Trans -4- amino cyclohexanol
214 363.8 4365.6
Sodium borohydride 64 108.8 1305.6
Methanol 2565 4360.5 52326
Acetone 2376 4039.2 48470.4
2 ANASTROZOLE
a,a,a,a,-tetramethyl-5-(methyl)-1,3- benzenedi- acetonitrile
10 80 960
Acetonitrile 15 120 1440 1
N- bromosuccianmide 8.25 66 792
Ethyl acetate 25 200 2400 2.5
Cyclohexane 5 40 480 0.25
1,2,4-triazole 3.125 25 300
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 82 -
Potassium carbonate 6.25 50 600
3 GEMCITABINE HCl
Methanol 117 351 4212 6
Ammonia 25% 67.8 203.4 2440.8
Methanol 90 270 3240 6
Carbon 1.2 3.6 43.2
HCl 4.8 14.4 172.8
Output from 2nd stage 4.5 13.5 162
Acetic acid 240 720 8640 3
HCl 4.8 14.4 172.8
4
PACLITAXEL
TxL RM 2 16.6 199.2
Zinc 3.75 31.125 373.5
Methanol 15.6 129.48 1553.76 0.6
Acetic acid 20 166 1992
Ethyl acetate 22.5 186.75 2241 0.5
MDC 17.45 144.835 1738.02 0
Acetone 5.27 43.741 524.892 0
Petroleum ether 32.7 271.41 3256.92 0
Methanol 9.36 77.688 932.256 1.36
MDC 4.85 40.255 483.06 0.35
Acetone 1.38 11.454 137.448 0.18
Petroleum ether 7.7 63.91 766.92
TxL RM 2 16.6 199.2
5 TEMOZOLOMIDE
5-amino-1-(n-methyl carbomyl) imidazole-4-carboxamide
4 32 384
Water 24 192 2304
Sodium nitrite 1.6 12.8 153.6
Tartaric acid 3.2 25.6 307.2
Acetone 16 128 1536 0.6
Carbon 0.2 1.6 19.2
6 BICALUTAMIDE
N-[4-cyano-3-trifluoromethyl phenyl]-3-[4-fluorophenyl thio]-2-hydroxy-2-methyl propanamide
12 60 720
Acetonitrile 100 500 6000 3
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 83 -
Potassium permanganate
5 25 300
Isopropyl alcohol 10 50 600 2
7 DOCETAXEL TRIHYDRATE
CN1 2 16 192
Acetonitrile 20 160 1920 6
6N HCl 0.84 6.72 80.64
Saturated sodium bicarbonate solution in water 10 kg in 12 L water
44 352 4224
Ethyl acetate 30 240 2880 4
Sodium chloride 0.6 4.8 57.6
Sodium sulfate 2 16 192
Methylene di chloride (MDC)
24 192 2304 4
Acetone 24 192 2304 2
Petroleum ether 60 480 5760 6
Methanol 24 192 2304 4
8
3A,7B-DIHYDROXY CHOLANIC
ACID
Methanol 952.4 19048 228576 23.8
Methylcholonate 595 11900 142800
Ethyl acetate 1071.4 21428 257136 5.95
Sodium carbonate 238 4760 57120
Acetic anhydride 357 7140 85680
Sodium hypochloride 952.4 19048 228576
Acetic acid 76 1520 18240
2M enol 3809.5 76190 914280 11.9
HzHz 500 10000 120000
KOH 357 7140 85680
Sodium bromate 95 1900 22800
MDC 512 10240 122880 17.4
Sodium metal 333.3 6666 79992
Hydrochloric acid 130.95 2619 31428
Butanol 4523.8 90476 1085712 47.6
9 BENDAMUSTINE HCL
Ethyl-4-(5-(bis(2-hydroxy ethyl) amino)-1-methyl-1H-benzoid) imidazol-2-yl)butanoate
5 70 840
Thionyl chloride 20 280 3360
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 84 -
10
BORTEZOMIB
R-borolex-(+)-pinanediol trifluoro acetic acid
0.045 1.8765 22.518
n-hydroxy succinamide
0.02 0.834 10.008
MDC 0.2 8.34 100.08 0.05
Disopropyl amine 0.04 1.668 20.016
1N HCl 0.5 20.85 250.2
Saturated sodium bicarbonate
0.5 20.85 250.2
Methanol 0.6 25.02 300.24
Methanol 0.1 4.17 50.04
0.5 MDC 0.2 8.34 100.08
Ethyl acetate 0.5 20.85 250.2
n-Heptane 2 83.4 1000.8
Isobutyl boronic acid 0.015 0.6255 7.506
1N HCl 0.5 20.85 250.2
Sat. sodium bicarbonate
0.5 20.85 250.2
Methanol 0.039 1.6263 19.5156 0
11 Capacitabine 5-methyl tetrahydrofuran-2,3,4-triyl triacetate
15 750 9000
Toluene 30 1500 18000 1
Hexa methyl disaline (HMDS)
15 750 9000
5-fluorocytosine 10 500 6000
Tetra methyl silyl chloride (TMSC)
0.5 25 300
Methylene di-chloride (MDC)
50 2500 30000 3
Sodium bicarbonate 15 750 9000
Water 30 1500 18000
Stannic chloride 16 800 9600
Isopropyl alcohol 50 2500 30000 2
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 85 -
Methylene di chloride (MDC)
25 1250 15000 5
N-pentyl chloroformate
11 550 6600
Pyridine 6 300 3600
Heptane 50 2500 30000 3
Methanol 35 1750 21000 2
MDC 25 1250 15000 3
Toluene 90 4500 54000 3
Hydrochloric acid 5 250 3000
Sodium hydroxide 2 100 1200
12
IMATINIB MESYLATE
4-methyl-N3-(5-pyridin-3yl pyrimidine-2-yl) benzene-1,3-diamine
10 417 5004
4-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl-ethyl)benzoic acid dihydrochloride
10 417 5004
Methylene dichloride (MDC)
100 4170 50040 5
Triethyl amine 20 834 10008
Hydroxy benzotriazole 6 250.2 3002.4
Methanol 50 2085 25020 3
Methane sulphonic acid
2 83.4 1000.8
Carbon 1 41.7 500.4
13 LENALIDOMIDE
Methanol 4 166.8 2001.6 1
4-nitropthalide 1 41.7 500.4
Raney nickel catalyst 0.1 4.17 50.04
Dimethyl sulphoxide 5 208.5 2502 0.1
L-glutamine 1 41.7 500.4
N,N, carbomyl diimidazole
3 125.1 1501.2
Carbon 0.1 4.17 50.04
14 LETROZOLE p-tolunitrile 3 12.6 151.2
n-bromosuccinamide 2.5 10.5 126
Aceto nitrile 15 63 756 0.5
Hexane 3 12.6 151.2 0.3
1,2,4-triazole 1 4.2 50.4
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 86 -
Dimethyl formamide 3 12.6 151.2 0.3
Potassium carbonate 3 12.6 151.2
Ethyl acetate 10 42 504 0.5
15 PEMETREXED DISODIUM
4-[2-(2-amino-4,7-dihydro-4-oxo-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-5-yl)ethyl)benzolic acid
1.56 32.448 389.376
N-methyl morphalane 1.16 24.128 289.536
DMF 10.2 212.16 2545.92 0.7
MDC 38.5 800.8 9609.6 7.7
2-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazine
1 20.8 249.6
Hydrochloric acid 1 20.8 249.6
Sodium hydroxide 1 20.8 249.6
Water 25 520 6240
Acetone 30.78 640.224 7682.688 0.8
Hydrochloric acid 1 20.8 249.6
Sodium hydroxide 1 20.8 249.6
16
Decitabine
2-Deoxy ribose 7.6 12.92 155.04
Methanol 60.8 103.36 1240.32 10.8
Acetyl chloride 0.38 0.646 7.752
Sodium bicarbonate 4 6.8 81.6
MDC 121.6 206.72 2480.64 21.6
Acetyl Chloride 19.1 32.47 389.64
Pyridine 19.3 32.81 393.72
Conc. HCl 3.8 6.46 77.52
Sodium Bicarbonate 3.8 6.46 77.52
Sodium Sulphate 5 8.5 102
5- Azacytocine 4.6 7.82 93.84
Ammonium Sulphate 0.28 0.476 5.712
HMDS 23 39.1 469.2 4.5
TMS triflate 14.6 24.82 297.84
MDC 203 345.1 4141.2 43
Sodium Sulphate 10 17 204
Isopropanol 41.6 70.72 848.64
Sodium Carbonate 3.3 5.61 67.32
Sodium bicarbonate 19.5 33.15 397.8
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 87 -
Metahnolic Ammonia 80 136 1632
Dimethyl Sulfoxide 5.5 9.35 112.2
Methanol 76 129.2 1550.4
Activated Char Coal 0.5 0.85 10.2
17 Cytrabine Cytidine 1 13 156
Di Methyl Formide 20 260 3120 20
Methanol 25 325 3900 25
Phosphoryl Chloride 5.67 73.71 884.52
t-butylamine 0.18 2.34 28.08 0.18
Methanol 2.15 27.95 335.4 2.15
18
Cabazitaxel
10-DAB-III 1 2.1 25.2
Dimethylsulphate 6.96 14.616 175.392
Sodium hydride (60% w/w)
0.22 0.462 5.544
Calcium hydirde 0.02 0.042 0.504
Tetrahydrofuran 8.86 18.606 223.272 8.86
30% Ammonium chloride solution
10 21 252
Diisopropyl ether 21.02 44.142 529.704 21.02
Acetone 1.57 3.297 39.564 1.57
DMF 2.19 4.599 55.188 2.19
Methanol 18.43 38.703 464.436 18.43
Oxazolidinesidechain 0.7 1.47 17.64
N,N'-Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide
0.73 1.533 18.396
4-Dimethylaminopyridine
0.05 0.105 1.26
Ethyl acetate 21.45 45.045 540.54 21.45
Ethanol 9.16 19.236 230.832 9.16
Hexanes 5.58 11.718 140.616 5.58
NaCl solution 30 63 756
p-Toluenesulfonic acid Monohydrate
0.07 0.147 1.764
Diisopropyl ether 30.97 65.037 780.444 30.97
Methanol 4.63 9.723 116.676 4.63
Methanol 16.19 33.999 407.988 0
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 88 -
19 Acebrophylline
2 – amino 3,5-dibromo benzaldehyde
150 495 5940
Trans-4-amino cyclohexanol
62.5 206.25 2475
Sodium borohydride 22.5 74.25 891
Methanol 910 3003 36036 15
Dimethyl formamide (DMF)
1065 3514.5 42174 15
Ethyl acetate 5350 17655 211860 40
Thiophylline-7-acetic acid
128 422.4 5068.8
20
Cloferabine
2-deoxy-2-â-fluoro-1,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-1-R-D-ribofuranose
2.33 4.66 55.92
HBr in AcOH (30 wt %) 4.06 8.12 97.44
Dichloromethane 30.98 61.96 743.52 30.98
Sodiumbicarbonate 104.87 209.74 2516.88
Sodium sulphate 0.23 0.46 5.52
Hexane 15.61 31.22 374.64 15.61
2-Chloro adenine 1 2 24
Butyric anhydride 5.6 11.2 134.4
N-methyl imidazole 2.57 5.14 61.68
Methanol 34.8 69.6 835.2
Bromosugar (Stage-IA)
1.87 3.74 44.88
Potassium tert-butoxide
0.45 0.9 10.8
Calcium hydride 0.17 0.34 4.08
t-amyl alcohol 9.4 18.8 225.6
Anisole 2.87 5.74 68.88
Ethyl acetate 24.11 48.22 578.64 4.11
Saturated NaClsoln 9.6 19.2 230.4
Hexanes 38.6 77.2 926.4 6.6
Acetone 9.36 18.72 224.64
Celite 1.44 2.88 34.56
Sodium methoxide (30% w/w in methanol)
1.87 3.74 44.88
Methanol 46.28 92.56 1110.72 46.28
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 89 -
Acetic acid 0.17 0.34 4.08
Charcoal 0.14 0.28 3.36
Celite 2.14 4.28 51.36
21
MELPHALAN HCL
N-phthaloyl-p-nitro-L-phenylalanine
12.2 46.36 556.32
Acetic acid 164.6 625.48 7505.76 32.6
5 % Pd/C 1.22 4.636 55.632
Hydrogen gas cylinders
0 0 0
Methylene dichloride 50 190 2280 10
Celite 0.5 1.9 22.8
N-phthaloyl-p-nitro-L-phenylalanine
0 0 0
Thionyl chloride 4.3 16.34 196.08
Ethyl Acetate 63.6 241.68 2900.16 13.6
Methanol 100 380 4560 20
Methyl-N-phthaloyl-p-amino-L-phenylalanine
4.3 16.34 196.08
2-Chloroethanol 6 22.8 273.6
Di-isopropyl ethylamine
21 79.8 957.6
Dichloromethane 48 182.4 2188.8
Sodium sulphate 2 7.6 91.2
Methyl-N-phthaloyl-p-bis-(2-hydroxyethyl)-amino-L-phenylalanine
5.46 20.748 248.976
Phosphorous oxychloride
4.6 17.48 209.76
Toluene 23 87.4 1048.8 5
Dichloromethane 1024 3891.2 46694.4 374
Methanol 2.6 9.88 118.56 1.1
n-Heptane 396.2 1505.56 18066.72 36.2
Silica gel 47.4 180.12 2161.44
22 Tenfovir
3-(6-amino-9H-purin-9-yl)-1,1,1-trifluoropropan-2-ol
2100 132510 1590120
Sodium hydroxide 7.5 473.25 5679
1,2-Propylene carbonate
520 32812 393744 70
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 90 -
DMF 3850 242935 2915220 150
Lithium-t-butoxide 2890 182359 2188308
Diethyl p-toluenesulfonyl-oxymethylphosphonate
2100 132510 1590120
Acetic acid 440 27764 333168
MDC 21900 1381890 16582680 200
Sodium hydroxide 187.5 11831.25 141975
MDC 1050 66255 795060 150
Bromotrimethylsilane 980 61838 742056
Acetone 20 1262 15144
Acetonitrile 750 47325 567900 100
23 Cyclophosphamide
Diethanol amine 1 16.7 200.4
Thionyl chloride 3.38 56.446 677.352
Toluene 6.85 114.395 1372.74 1.85
Acetone 5.43 90.681 1088.172 0.23
Phosphorus Oxychloride
3.92 65.464 785.568
Toluene 13.08 218.436 2621.232 2.08
10% KH2PO4 Sol 22.83 381.261 4575.132
Sodium sulphate 0.15 2.505 30.06
n-Heptane 10.34 172.678 2072.136 2.14
3-Aminopropanol 0.54 9.018 108.216
Triethylamine 1.47 24.549 294.588
Dichloromethane 37.23 621.741 7460.892
Ethylacetate 36.8 614.56 7374.72 8
n-Hexane 13.14 219.438 2633.256 4.94
Sodium sulphate 0.19 3.173 38.076
24
PMK(PEMETREXED
DIPOTASSIUM )
4-(2-(2-amino-4,7-dihydro-4oxo-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine-5-yl)ethyl)benzoic acid
6 62.4 748.8
Dimethyl formamide 39.9 414.96 4979.52 7.9
N-methyl Morpholine 6.1 63.44 761.28
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 91 -
2-chloro-4,6 dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazine
3.9 40.56 486.72
L-Glutamic acid dimethyl ester hydrochloride
6.18 64.272 771.264
Methylene dichloride 156 1622.4 19468.8 26.6
Potassium bicarbonate
2.4 24.96 299.52
Potassium hydroxide 3.95 41.08 492.96
Conc. HCl 4.8 49.92 599.04
Activated Carbon 0.6 6.24 74.88
Celite 0.5 5.2 62.4
Potassium Acetate 21 218.4 2620.8
Ethanol 9.47 98.488 1181.856
Hydrochloric acid 1.09 11.336 136.032
Photassium hydroxide 0.21 2.184 26.208
Water 124.9 1298.96 15587.52
Potassium Acetate 42 436.8 5241.6
Ethanol 18.94 196.976 2363.712 8.94
Ethanol 37.9 394.16 4729.92 9.4
Hydrochloric acid 0.36 3.744 44.928
Photassium hydroxide 0.07 0.728 8.736
25 Erlotonib 4,5-bis(2-methoxyethoxy)-2-nitrobenzonitrile
42 281.4 3376.8
Sodium hydrosulfite 85%
84 562.8 6753.6
Con. HCl 160 1072 12864
50% Sodium hydroxide in water
80 536 6432
Sodium sulfate 10 67 804
Ethyl acetate 690 4623 55476 60
Hexane 200 1340 16080 40
Celite 1 6.7 80.4
Carbon 4.2 28.14 337.68
N,N-Dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal
35 234.5 2814
Toluene 350 2345 28140 35
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 92 -
Acetic acid 0.5 3.35 40.2
ET-RM-03 (17.5 Kg) 17.5 117.25 1407
Acetic acid (247 lit) 247 1654.9 19858.8 47
Ethyl acetate (175 lit) 175 1172.5 14070 45
25% Ammonia solution (230 lit)
230 1541 18492
Water (820 lit) 820 5494 65928
Toluene (2560 lit) 2560 17152 205824 90
IPA 675 4522.5 54270
Carbon 2.5 16.75 201
Celite 2.5 16.75 201
Methyl isobutyl ketone
675 4522.5 54270
IPA-HCl 32.5 217.75 2613
26 Emtricitabine (2R,5R)-5-Hydroxy-[1,3]-oxathiolane-2-carboxylic acid,2S-isopropyl-5R-methyl-1R-cyclohexyl ester
532.5 159.75 1917
Thionyl chloride 282.5 84.75 1017
DMF 400 120 1440 20
Dichloromethane 7792.5 2337.75 28053 779
5-fluorocytosine 237.5 71.25 855
HMDS 345 103.5 1242
Methane Sulfonic acid 5 1.5 18
Hexane 2262.5 678.75 8145 113
Tri ethyl amine 437.5 131.25 1575 21
Ethyl acetate 240 72 864 12
Toluene 1382.5 414.75 4977 69.5
Acetonitrile 2510 753 9036 125
Dibasic potassium phosphate 657.5
197.25 2367
Sodium borohydride 102.5 30.75 369
Ethanol 3655 1096.5 13158 905
Ethyl acetate 2900 870 10440 650
85% Phosporic acid 227.5 68.25 819
1-Propanol 2600 780 9360 375
Carbon 9.5 2.85 34.2
27 Elvitegravir 3-Chloro-2-Fluoro Benzoic Acid
257.726 1030.904 12370.848
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 93 -
Toluene 773.178 3092.712 37112.544 78
N,N-Dimethyl form amide
10.30904 41.23616 494.83392
Thionyl Chloride 307.209392
1228.837568
14746.05082
Alluminium Chloride Anhydrous
226.025702
904.102808
10849.2337
Methylene Dichloride 1030.904 4123.616 49483.392 102
1,3-Dimethoxy Benzene
224.22162
896.88648 10762.63776
Sodium Chloride 103.0904 412.3616 4948.3392
Saturated Sodium Bicarbonate Solution
1288.63 5154.52 61854.24
Concentrated Ammonium hydroxide
51.5452 206.1808 2474.1696
Iso Propyl Alcohol 1030.904 4123.616 49483.392 104
n-Heptane 1546.356 6185.424 74225.088 154
Tetra hydro Furan 1288.63 5154.52 61854.24 129
Sodium Borohydride Powder
50.25656 201.02624 2412.31488
BF3.THF 404.6298 1618.5192 19422.2304
Acetone 162.3624 649.4496 7793.3952
Sodium Hydroxide 74.74053 298.96212 3587.54544
Methylene Dichloride 1700.991 6803.964 81647.568 170
Sodium Chloride 85.04957 340.19828 4082.37936
Aluminium Chloride 141.7493 566.9972 6803.9664
Acetyl Chloride 85.04957 340.19828 4082.37936
Isopropyl Alcohol 850.4957 3401.9828 40823.7936 85
n-Heptane 1133.994 4535.976 54431.712 113
Output from Stage - II 255.1487 1020.5948 12247.1376
Tetra hydro Furan 3827.231 15308.924 183707.088 383
Potassium tertiary But oxide
354.3732 1417.4928 17009.9136
Diethyl Carbonate 466.484 1865.936 22391.232
Concentrated Hydrochloride
288.6531 1154.6124 13855.3488
Sodium Chloride 103.0904 412.3616 4948.3392
Ethyl Acetate 1288.63 5154.52 61854.24 129
n-Heptane 2577.26 10309.04 123708.48 257.31
Toluene 1340.175 5360.7 64328.4 134
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 94 -
Acetic acid 1.0825 4.33 51.96
N,N-Dimethyl Form amide Dimethyl Acetal
122.1621 488.6484 5863.7808
Sodium Chloride 80.4105 321.642 3859.704
Ethyl acetate 402.0525 1608.21 19298.52
n-Heptane 1608.21 6432.84 77194.08 161
Toluene 2063.87 8255.48 99065.76 207
(S)-2-Amino-3-methyl-1-butanol
75.51 302.04 3624.48
N,O-Bis (trimethylsillyl)acetamide
330.5851 1322.3404 15868.0848
Activated Carbon 14.74193 58.96772 707.61264
Con.HCl (33.5%) 44.92 179.68 2156.16
45% KOH Solution 39.99 159.96 1919.52
Isopropyl alcohol 247.4169 989.6676 11876.0112 25
Hyflo 30.92712 123.70848 1484.50176
45%w/w KOH solution 115.719 462.876 5554.512
DM Water 1650.735 6602.94 79235.28
Isopropyl alcohol 2486.54 9946.16 119353.92
Acetic acid 79.5877 318.3508 3820.2096
High Flow 30.92711 123.70844 1484.50128
Activated Carbon 14.74192 58.96768 707.61216
Isopropyl alcohol 2040.979 8163.916 97966.992 204
28 Dimethyl fumarate
Fumaric Acid 277.77 83.331 999.972
Acetyl Chloride 187.77 56.331 675.972
Methanol 2222.182 666.6546 7999.8552 222.2
Hyflow 27.77 8.331 99.972
Methanol 5333.33 1599.999 19199.988 533
29 Busulfan 1,4-butane diol 1.5 49.5 594
Methane sulfonyl chloride
3.2 105.6 1267.2
Triethyl amine 6.8 224.4 2692.8
Acetonitrile 11.3 372.9 4474.8
Acetone 26.3 867.9 10414.8 5
Acetone 99.2 3273.6 39283.2 12.5
Act Carbon 0.169 5.577 66.924
Celite 0.845 27.885 334.62
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 95 -
30 Cobicistat (S)-2-benzyl-N,N-dimethylazaridine-1-sulfonamide
6.33 26.586 319.032
2,2,6,6-trimethylpipyridine(TMP)
0.37 1.554 18.648
n-hexyl lithium in hexane
2.91 12.222 146.664
Acetic acid 12.65 53.13 637.56 12.65
Ethyl acetate 63.25 265.65 3187.8 13.75
Toluene 11.01 46.242 554.904 2.01
THF 7.31 30.702 368.424 7.31
Heptane 10.75 45.15 541.8 3.95
Diethylene triamine 4.34 18.228 218.736
10%Pd/C 0.15 0.63 7.56
Toluene 61.63 258.846 3106.152 7.6
Water 116.38 488.796 5865.552
Sodium hydroxide 0.84 3.528 42.336
DCM 47.11 197.862 2374.344 12
IPA.HC l 0.61 2.562 30.744
NaOH 0.75 3.15 37.8
DCM 142.58 598.836 7186.032 22
4-nitrophenyl(thiazol-5-yl)methyl carbonate
2.71 11.382 136.584
THF 108.64 456.288 5475.456 27
(L)-Methionine 4.4 18.48 221.76
Bromoaceticacid 4.39 18.438 221.256
IPA 20.76 87.192 1046.304 0
IPA.HCl 4.4 18.48 221.76
MTBE 2.97 12.474 149.688
Methyl amino thiazolDihydrochloride
3.7 15.54 186.48
Carbonyldiimidazole 3.51 14.742 176.904
N,N-Diisopropylethylamine
7.87 33.054 396.648
Citric acid 4.39 18.438 221.256
Dichloromethane 70.04 294.168 3530.016 15.04
TMSI 9.87 41.454 497.448
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 96 -
Ethanol 4.29 18.018 216.216 4.29
Morpholine 9.55 40.11 481.32
Dichloromethane 43.35 182.07 2184.84 12
Oxalic Acid Dihydrate 3.45 14.49 173.88
Acetone 24.4 102.48 1229.76 6
Dichloro methane 89.18 374.556 4494.672 19
Potassium bicarbonate
7.17 30.114 361.368
Potassium hydroxide 0.68 2.856 34.272
HOBT.Hydrate 0.77 3.234 38.808
EDC.HCl 2.61 10.962 131.544
Citric acid 8.25 34.65 415.8
Potassium carbonate 5.15 21.63 259.56
Hyflow 2 8.4 100.8
Carbon, Activated 0.83 3.486 41.832
Zeofree 4.79 20.118 241.416
N-Heptane 73.82 310.044 3720.528 12
31 Zoledranic Acid
1,4-butane diol 1.5 0.6 7.2
Chloroacetic acid 5.5 2.2 26.4
Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) 17.2 6.88 82.56 3.2
Potassium hydrogen sulfate
8 3.2 38.4
Triethylamine (TEA) 10.34 4.136 49.632 1.24
Imidazole 2.64 1.056 12.672
MDC 24.6 9.84 118.08 6.6
DM water 29 11.6 139.2
Methanol 10.2 4.08 48.96 2.7
HCl 2.58 1.032 12.384
Acetone 11.8 4.72 56.64 2.6
Chlorobenzene 7.3 2.92 35.04 1.3
Ortho phosphoric acid 3.29 1.316 15.792
Phosphorous trichloride
5.38 2.152 25.824
9N HCl 8 3.2 38.4
Acetone 78 31.2 374.4 6
Activated Carbon 0.13 0.052 0.624
Celite 0.37 0.148
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 97 -
32 Tranexamic Acid
1,4 Dimethyl Cyclohexane dicarboxylate
1500 24750 297000
(DMCD)
Tin oxide 80 1320 15840
Ammonia gas 330 5445 65340
1,4 Dimethyl Cyclohexane dicarboxylate
1300 21450 257400
NaoH solution 622 10263 123156
24%-NaOH solution 731 12061.5 144738
Activated Raney-Ni 69.7 1150.05 13800.6
25%Ammonia solution
337 5560.5 66726
Hydrogen gas 14569 240388.5 2884662
1N NaOH solution 3476 57354 688248
0.2N NaOH solution 3376 55704 668448
Cataion resin 5510 90915 1090980
1.5% Ammonia solution
13945 230092.5 2761110
2.6% Ammonia solution
8135 134227.5 1610730
Anion resin 874.5 14429.25 173151
Activated carbon 167.74 2767.71 33212.52
Acetone 1401 23116.5 277398 101
33 Sunitinib Malate
N,N-Diethyl ethylene diamine (d:0.82)
0.63 7.875 94.5
HOBt 0.92 11.5 138
EDCI.HCl 1.31 16.375 196.5
DMAP 0.06 0.75 9
DCM d:1.33 45.47 568.375 6820.5 22.73
Sodium carbonate 0.38 4.75 57
Toluened:0.866 6.58 82.25 987 0.66
Sodium hydroxide 0.38 4.75 57
Activated Carbon 0.01 0.125 1.5
Celite 0.04 0.5 6
5-fluoroindolin-2-one 0.57 7.125 85.5
Pyrrolidine 0.04 0.5 6
Water 75.91 948.875 11386.5
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 98 -
Methanol d:0.791 16.79 209.875 2518.5 3.36
L- Malic acid 0.36 4.5 54
Methyl Ethyl Ketone d:0.805
13.23 165.375 1984.5 2.65
34 Sorafenib Tosylate
4-Chloro-N-methyl-2-pyridine carboxamide
0.44 11 132
4-Aminophenol 0.48 12 144
4-Chloro-3-trifluoro methyl phenyl Isocyanate
0.7 17.5 210
Para Toluene sulphonic acid
0.41 10.25 123
Sodium Hydroxide 0.21 5.25 63
Sodium chloride 0.8 20 240
Activated charcoal 0.09 2.25 27
Hyflow 7.5 187.5 2250
Dimethyl sulphoxide 2 50 600
DCM 4 100 1200 2.5
Toluene 25.2 630 7560 8.7
Hexanes 9.5 237.5 2850 2.5
DM water 24 600 7200
Methyl ethyl ketone 50 1250 15000 12.1
35 Abiraterone acetate
Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) 100
250 3000
Hydrazine Monohydrate (64-65%) 43.2
108 1296
Ethanol 789 1972.5 23670 789
DM Water (Lot-1) 8.8 22 264
DM Water (Lot-2) 4000 10000 120000
DM Water (Lot-3) 200 500 6000
N-Bromo succinimide (NBS) 148
370 4440
1,1,3,3-Tetramethylguanidine (TMG) 248
620 7440
MDC 1584 3960 47520 792
DM Water (Lot-1) 1200 3000 36000
DM Water (Lot-2) 1200 3000 36000
DM Water (Lot-3) 600 1500 18000
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 99 -
DM Water (Lot-4) 100 250 3000
Metanol (Lot-1) 79.2 198 2376 158.4
Metanol (Lot-2) 79.2 198 2376
1N HCl solution 1000 2500 30000 1000
IPA (Lot-1) 78.6 196.5 2358
550.2 IPA (Lot-2) 393 982.5 11790
IPA (Lot-3) 78.6 196.5 2358
NaCl Solution 400 1000 12000
Anhydrous Na2SO4 60 150 1800 60
3-(diethylboryl)pyridine 27.5
68.75 825
Tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium 2.15
5.375 64.5
Sodium carbonate 59.32 148.3 1779.6
IPA (Lot-1) 361.1 902.75 10833 360.1
IPA (Lot-2) 52 130 1560
DM Water (Lot-1) 276 690 8280
DM Water (Lot-2) 524.8 1312 15744
DM Water (Lot-3) 65.6 164 1968
DM Water (Lot-4) 524.8 1312 15744
DM Water (Lot-5) 65.6 164 1968
Methanol (Lot-1) 416 1040 12480
Methanol (Lot-2) 52 130 1560
Conc., HCl 46 115 1380
n-Hexane (Lot-1) 215 537.5 6450
n-Hexane (Lot-2) 215 537.5 6450
10% NaOHSolu 223 557.5 6690
Acetic acid 23.32 58.3 699.6
Tri ethyl amine (TEA) 16.8 42 504
MDC 792 1980 23760 396
DM Water (Lot-1) 600 1500 18000
DM Water (Lot-2) 200 500 6000
DM Water (Lot-3) 600 1500 18000
10% NaOH solution 6 15 180
n- Hexane 52.4 131 1572
AB-IV (Crude) 42.8 107 1284
Acetone (Lot-I) 696 1740 20880 751.6
Acetone (Lot-II) 63.2 158 1896
ConcHCl (10-15%) 30 75 900 30
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 100 -
MDC (Lot-I) 633.6 1584 19008 316.8
Sat., NaHCO3Solu (Lot-I)
240 600 7200
480 Sat., NaHCO3Solu (Lot-2)
240 600 7200
DM Water (Lot-I) 240 600 7200
DM Water (Lot-2) 520 1300 15600
n-Hexane (Lot-I) 52.4 131 1572 74.98 Chilled n-Hexane (Lot-
2) 52.4
131 1572
Ethanol (Lot-I) 379 947.5 11370 410.5
Hot Ethanol (Lot-2) 31.5 78.75 945
Activated carbon 2 5 60
2.7.4.2 SOURCE OF SUPPLY OF RAW MATERIALS & MARKETING AREA OF FINAL PRODUCTS
The raw materials are either obtained from local suppliers (Kolkata, Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh,) or imported (China) & transportation mode is by air, road & sea details appended in the table 2.10.
2.7.4.2.1 RAW MATERIALS SUPPLIERS
The raw materials are either obtained from local suppliers (Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh) or imported (China) & transportation mode is by air, road & sea.
Table 2.10 : Raw materials suppliers
Sl. no.
Raw material Supplier
1 Diethyl(3-pyridyl)borane Brilliant Top Corporation Limited,Room 2105 Bj 1689 Trend Centre 29-31, Cheung Lee Street, Chaiwan, HK Tel: +86-311-85855976,FAX:+86-311-85855976
2 THEOPHYLLINE-7 ACETIC ACID (ACEPHYLLINE)
Bajaj Health Care Limited, Block No.588, Savli-KarachiaRoad,Ta.Savli,Dist.Vadodara,INDIA
3 2 AMINO 3,5 DI BROMO BENZALDEHYDE (2 ADB)
Kores (India) limited ,C-7/1-b, T.T.C. Industrial Area M.I.D.C. Pawane, Navi, Mumbai -400705
4 TRANS-4-AMINO CYCLOHEXANOL (Tobic Aldehyde)
Hangzhou Longshan Chemical Co., Ltd Puyan Town, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, 310053, China
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 101 -
5 1-H 1,2,4-Triazole Sodium Salt Riddhi Pharma,A-2/2511,G.I.D.C,Estate,Near Asian paints crossing,Ankaleshwar-393002,Gujarat
6 3,5Bis(2-Cyano isopropyl)toluene(APRM01)
Nikita Chemical Industries ,T – 59, 60&72, M. I. D. C. Tarapur, Boisar, Thane- 401506, Maharashtra , India
7 6-Iodo 1-H-indozole
Dongying Huakang Chemical Co,Ltd, DongYing Port Economic,Development Zone,DongYing, City,Shandong province,China
8 2-Mercapto-N -methyl benzamide
Shanghai Yudiao Chemistry Technology Co.,Ltd,Xiachenqingyang Co.,Ltd,Xiachenqingyang, Mountian,Fenghua City,Zhejiang,China
9 2- Vinyl pyridine
Vertellus Health and specialty Products (LLC),1500S,TibbsAvenue,Indianapolis,Indiana-46241,USA
10 N-[4-CYANO-3-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL) PHENYL]-2-METHYLOXIRANE-2-CARBOXAMIDE (BIC-2)
Avra Laboratories P.Ltd, A-21, IDA Nacharam, Road No: 18, Hyderabad. Gyro Shanghai Puyi Chem-Tech Co., Ltd, , China. Shanghai willpower industrial co., ltd, 1958 Zhong shan north road, Shanghai-200063, China
11 4-FLUROTHIOPHENOL (FT) Alfa Aesar India,Johnson Matthey Chemicals,India Pvt. Ltd. Alfa Aesar Division,Survey No 195, 196,Kandlakoya Village Medchal Mandal,R R District,Hyderabad - 501401
12 (R)- BOROLEUCINE-(1S,2S,3R,5S)- (+)- PINANE DIOL (or) ( R)-BOROLEU-(+)-PINANEDIOL-CF3COOH (BZ-Intermediate)
Zhejiang Medicines & Health Products Import & Export Co., Ltd, ZMC Building, 101-2, N, Zhongshan Road, Hangzhou, 310003 China
13 L-Phenylalanine Navpad Trade Impex. P1/103, Munidhra, Phase II, Munisuvrat Complex, Behind Holley Merry School, Anjur Phata, Rahenal, Bhiwandi, THANE- 421302
14 1,4BUTANEDIOL (BD) BASF The chemical company, SE, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany, Tel: +49 1802273112.
15 METHANE SULFONYL CHLORIDE (G-3)
Henan Kebang Chemical Co., Ltd ,Industry zone,eastern citty,sheqi country,henan china.
16 7β,10β-dimethoxy-10(dab III -10-DAB III)
SM Herbals Pvt, Ltd., A-1132, RIICO Industrial Area, Phase-III, Bhiwadi Dist, Alwar (Raj,) 301019, Tel: 08310850975
17 2R, 4S, 5R)-3-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)-2-(4- methoxyphenyl)-4 -Phenyloxazolidine-5-
Easter Technology development Co., Limited, Room c, 15/F Hua chiao commercial centre, 678 Nathan roads, Mongkok.KL, HK Tel: 86-311-67260775, Fax: 86-311-67591193
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 102 -
carboxylic acid/Oxazolidine side chain acid
18 5-FLUOROCYTOSINE (CP 005)
Hangzhou Utanphrma Biology Co., Ltd. RM D -912, No:789, Moganshan Road, Hangzhou Zhejiang. China
19 5-DEOXY-TRIACETATE- D-RIBOFURNANOSE (PCRMO1)
Suzhou lixin pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, No:21, Tangxi Road, Suzhou new district, 25151, P.R China
20 n-PENTYL CHLOROFORMATE (CPM)
Nutron Pharmaceuticals PVT, Ltd, 401 Earth Sampann Bldg, 198/200 Khet wadi main Road, 4th floor Mumbai-400004, India
21 2-Deoxy-2-Fluoro-1,3,5-Tri-O-Benzoyl-D-Ribofuranose
Easter technology development Co.,Limited
22 2-Chloro-6-Aminopurine/2-Chloro adenine
Easter technology development Co.,Limited
23 2-DEOXY -D- RIBOSE (DBRM01)
Beiging Ribo Biotech Co, Ltd Beijing –China Address: Room 710, XinCaiLiao ChuangYe Building, No.7 FengHuiZhong Road. HaiDian District, Beijing 100094, China
24 5-AZACYTOSINE (ATZRM01) Easter technology development Co.Ltd
25 Fumaric acid Anshan pan-asia import&export co ltd(Doshi enter prizes)
26 10-DEACETYL BACEATIN III (10-DAB)
SM Herbals Pvt, Ltd., A-1132, RIICO Industrial Area, Phase-III, Bhiwadi Dist, Alwar (Raj,)
27 (2R,3S)-2-BENZYLOXY-3-TETRA-BUTOXY CARBONYL AMINO 3-PHENYL PROPIONIC ACID (DCSC)
Accrete Pharmacetuticals Private Limited, office: 5-70, 1st floor, Near Andhra Bank, Street No:08, Habsiguda, Hyderabad-500 007, AP, India
28 3-Ethynylaniline HCl Suzhou lixin pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, No:21, Tangxi Road, Suzhou new district, 25151, P.R China
29 (4,5-bis(2-methoxyethoxy)-2-nitrobenzonitrile
Easter technology development Co.Ltd. Room c, 15/F Hua Chiao commercial centre,678 Nathan Road,Mangkok,KL,HK
30 ( N,N-Dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal) DMF-DMA
Vihita Chem Pvt Ltd,Plot No-305,GIDC,Ankeshwar 393002,Gujarat,India
31 4-bromo-2-fluorobenzoic acid (BFBA) (KSM-I)
BRILLIANT TOP Corporation, Room 2015 Bj 1689 Trend centre 29-31,Cheung Lee Street, Chai Wan, HK.
32 2-Aminoisobutyric acid (KSM-II)
BRILLIANT TOP Corporation, Room 2015 Bj 1689 Trend centre 29-31,Cheung Lee Street, Chai Wan, HK.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 103 -
33 4- Isothiocyanato-2-(trifluoromethyl) benzonitrile.(ICTB) (KSM-III)
Moltus Research Laboratories, N-59, MIDC, Tarapur, Boisar -401506.
34 2-DEOXY-2,2-DIFLUORO-D-RIBOFURANOSE-3.5-DIBENZOATE (G-9)
SMS Pharmaceuticals P Ltd Industrial Estate Khazipalli Village, Jinnarm, Medak – 502319
35 N-ACETYL CYSTOSINE (G-2)
Sinochem Shanghai Corporation, 17-19TH /FL, No:33, Henan Road, (S) Shanghai, China.
36 4 –(4-METHYL PIPERAZIN -1-YL METHYL BENZOIC DI HYDRO CHLORIDE) (I2)
Shanghai multimed union co Ltd,
37 CHOLIC ACID (CHA) ICE SRL,42122 Reggio Emilia – Italy, Via Sicilia 8/10, Tel: 0522 55.12.50, Fax: 0522 55.89.63
38 4-(BROMOMETHYL) BENZONITRILE
AnamiOrganics,SurNO.306/1/P,At sukhlav,Tal.Pardi,396125,Dist.Valsad. Gujarat.India
39 4-FLUORO BENZONITRILE AnamiOrganics,SurNO.306/1/P,At sukhlav,Tal.Pardi,396125,Dist.Valsad. Gujarat.India
40 1H,1,2,4-TRIAZOLE Riddhi Pharma Ankaleshwar,A-2, 2511, G. I. D. C, Industrial Estate, Ankleshwar, Gujarat 393002
41 2-Chloroethanol Viswaat Chemicals Limited, “Viswaat” 7Satsang complex,upper govind nagar, L.S Racheja ,Malad(E),Mumbai- 400097,India
42 10-Deacetyl Baccatin-III (10-DAB)
Deccan Nutraceuticals Pvt Ltd, Gat No.1065, Golegaon road, Markal, Off Alandi-Markal road, Tal.Khed, Pune-412105, Maharashtra, India
43 (4S, 5R)-3-(N-Benzoyl)-2-Paramethoxy phenyl-4-phenyl Oxazolidine-5-carboxylic acid/Oxazolidine side chain (BPPOC)
Shanghai Jinhe Bio-Technology Co., Ltd, No.135, alley 89, Zhengxia road, Liantang industrial park, Qingpu district Shanghai-201716, China
44 4-[2-(2-AMINO-4,7-DIHYDRO-4-OXO-1H-PYRROLO[2,3-D]PYRIMIDIN-5-YL)ETHYL]BENZOIC ACID (PMDBA)
Suzhou Everich Import and Export Co.Ltd. Everich Trade mansion, No: 265, Fenghuang street, suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
45 L-GLUTAMIC ACID DIMETHYL ESTER HYDROCHLORIDE (PMDGA)
YangZhou Baosheng Bio-Chemical Co., LTD,Jianshan town northern,Yangzhou,China
46 Para Amino Phenol/4-Aminophenol (Sorafenib)
Urmi Chemicals,Hafizain building, 5th floor, 129/131, kazi sayed street, Mumbai-3, India
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 104 -
47 4-Chloro-N-methyl-2-pyidine carboxamide
Brilliant top corporation Ltd, Room 2105 BJ 1689 Trend Centre 29-31, Cheunglee Street, Chaiwan, HK
48 4-chloro-3-trifluoro methylphenyl isocyanate
Brilliant top corporation Ltd, Room 2105 BJ 1689 Trend Centre 29-31, Cheunglee Street, Chaiwan, HK
49 5-Fluoro-1,3-Dihydro-indol-2-one
Nanjing Baijingyu Pharmaceutical, Co.,Ltd,Address:No-29,Fangshui East Road,Luhe Industry Park, Nanjing, P. R. C(China).
50 5-Formyl-2,4-dimethyl-1H-Pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid
Brilliant top corporation limited,Room No-2105,BJ 1689 Trend centre 29-39,Cheung lee street,Chai-Wan,H.K,China
51 Cyclamic Acid/N-Cyclohexyl Sulfamic acid
Egis Pharmaceuticals PLC. 1106Budapest, Kereszturi ut30-38-Hungary
52 Adenine Easter Technology Development Co., Ltd
53 R (+)-Propylene Carbonate Weifang Huitao Chemical Co., LTD, No. 18 HaiWang Road, BinHai Economic Development, Zone,WeiFang City, ShanDong Province, China.
54 Fumaric acid Anshan pan-asia import&export co ltd(Doshi enter prizes)
55 (R)-9-(2-Phosphonylmethoxy propyl) adenine (R-PMPA/TNF-II )
Shanghai Xinda Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd, 999 Linxian Road,Jinshan Industry Zone,Jinshan,Shanghai 201505,China PR
56 IMIDAZOLE (IM) Asian Scientific Instruments, 4-1-10, Tilak Road, Opp. Posnett Bhavan, Hyderabad-500 001, India.
57 CHLOROACETIC ACID (CL-1) SD Fine chem Limited, Regd office: 315-317, T.V Industrial Estate, 248, Worli Road, Mumbai-400 030, India.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 105 -
2.7.4.3 STORAGE FACILITY FOR RAW MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS
Adequate storage facilities are proposed to be provided for the raw materials, products etc., Separate storage is proposed for the solvents.Details of strorage facilities is appended in the below table 2.11.
Table 2.11:- Details of Storage Facilities
Sl. No.
Storage Facility for Facility
1
Raw Materials WAREHOUSE
CDMA,HBT, Etc CONTROLLED STORAGE AREA
TRIETHYLAMINE,Zink metal dust Etc LOW VOLUME ONCO RM'S STORAGE AREA
10-DAB-III, 2-DEOXY D RIBOSE Etc STORAGE 20-80C
STANNIC CHLORIDE, N-PROPANOL Etc DRUM STORAGE YARD-2
HYDRAZINE HYDRATE, PYRIDINE ETC DRUM STORAGE YARD-1
PHOSPHORIC ACID,HCl Etc ACID STORAGE AREA
SODIUM METAL, SODIUM HYDRIDE Etc HAZARDOUS STORAGE AREA
METHANOL, TOLUENE Etc BULK SOLVENT YARD
2 Products Bonded finished good store.
3 Industrial Effluent The effluent generated from industry will be treated in ETP followed by Stripper,MEE & RO.
4 Hazardous Waste Process residue is sent to cement industries for co-incineration (as an auxiliary fuel) during the manufacture of cement. The inorganic residue from the process will be stored scientifically and will be sent to TSDF for scientific treatment and disposal.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 106 -
2.7.5 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT DETAILS
The detailed list of machinery & equipments in the industry are appended in the tables below
Table 2.12: List of the machinery & equipments
1) C- Block Equipment
Sl.No. Name of the Equipment Equip.ID Capacity MOC
1. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-01 2.0 KL SS-316
2. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-02 2.0 KL SS-316
3. Glass Lined Reactor C/RE-03 3.0 KL MSGL
4. Glass Lined Reactor C/RE-04 3.0 KL MSGL
5. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-05 4.0 KL SS-316
6. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-06 4.0 KL SS-316
7. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-07 4.0 KL SS-316
8. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-08 6.0 KL SS-316
9. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-09 4.0 KL SS-316
10. Glass Lined Reactor C/RE-10 4.0 KL MSGL
11. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-11 5.0 KL SS-316
12. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-12 5.0 KL SS-316
13. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-13 5.0 KL SS-316
14. Glass Lined Reactor C/RE-14 4.0 KL MSGL
15. Stainless Steel Reactor C/RE-15 4.0 KL SS-316
16. Air Handling Unit C/AHU-01 7300 CFM -
17. Pass Box C/PB-01 - SS 304
18. Pass Box C/PB-02 - SS 304
19. Ventilation C/V-01 15600 CFM -
20. Ventilation Exhaust C/VE-01 15600 CFM -
21. Air Handling Unit C/AHU-02 8800 CFM -
22. Air Handling Unit C/AHU-03 4500 CFM -
23. Sparkler Filter C/SF-01 18" x 23 Plates SS-316
24. Sparkler Filter C/SF-02 18" x 23 Plates SS-316
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 107 -
25. Centrifuge C/CF-01 48” SS-316
26. Centrifuge C/CF-02 48” SS-316
27. Centrifuge C/CF-03 48” SS-316
28. Centrifuge C/CF-04 48” SS-316
29. Roto-cone Vacuum Drier C/RCVD-01 1500 L SS-316
30. Roto-cone Vacuum Drier C/RCVD-02 1500 L SS-316
31. Rotary Vacuum Paddle Drier C/RVPD-01 500 L SS-316
32. Vibro Sifter C/VSF-01 50 to 250
Kg/hr SS-316
33. Multimill C/MM-01 50 to 250
Kg/hr SS-316
34. Agitated Nutsche Filter C/ANFD-01 2 m2 SS-316
35. Agitated Nutsche Filter C/ANFD-02 2 m2 SS-316
36. Pressure Module C/PM-01 2100 CFM -
37. Pressure Module C/PM-02 2100 CFM -
38. Pressure Module C/PM-03 2100 CFM -
39. Pressure Module C/PM-04 2100 CFM -
40. Pressure Module C/PM-05 2100 CFM -
41. Pressure Module C/PM-06 2037 CFM -
42. Pressure Module C/PM-07 2037 CFM -
43. Pressure Module C/PM-08 2037 CFM -
44. Pressure Module C/PM-09 2037 CFM -
45. Pressure Module C/PM-10 2037 CFM -
46. Pressure Module C/PM-11 2037 CFM -
47. Pressure Module C/PM-12 1950 CFM -
48. Air Shower C/AS-01 - GI Powder
Coated
49. Air Shower C/AS-02 - GI Powder
Coated
50. Blender C/BL-01 1500 L SS-316
51. Micronizer C/MICRO-
01 5-15 kg/hr SS 316
52. Vacuum Tray Drier C/VTD-01 96 Trays SS 316
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 108 -
53. Vacuum Tray Drier C/VTD-02 96 Trays SS 316
54. Dynamic Pass Box C/DPB-01 -- SS 304
2) D- Block Equipment
S.No Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
1. Glass Lined Reactor D/RE-01 1.60 KL MSGL
2. Glass Lined Reactor D/RE-02 4.0 KL MSGL
3. Glass Lined Reactor D/RE-03 4.0 KL MSGL
4. Glass Lined Reactor D/RE-10 6.3 KL MSGL
5. Glass Lined Reactor D/RE-11 6.3 KL MSGL
6. Glass Lined Reactor D/RE-12 4.0 KL MSGL
7. Agitated Nutsche Filter and Drier
D/ANFD-02 2 m2 SS-316
8. Charging Isolator D/CIS-01 - SS-316
9. Pack Off Isolator D/PIS-01 - SS-316
10. Isolator D/IS-01 - SS-316
11. Isolator Multimill D/ISMM-01 5-25 / Hr SS-316
12. Isolator Vibrosifter D/ISVSF-01 - SS-316
13. Centrifuge Isolator D/ISCF-01 - SS-316
14. Vacuum Tray Dryer Isolator
D/ISVTD-01 - SS-316
15. Vacuum Tray Dryer D/VTD-02 12 Trays SS-316
16. Vacuum Tray Dryer D/VTD-03 12 Trays SS-316
17. Vacuum Tray Dryer D/VTD-04 140 Trays SS-316
18. Centrifuge D/CF-01 36” SS-316
19. Centrifuge D/CF-02 36” SS-316
20. Robo Filter D/RF-01 150 Ltrs SS316
21. Sparkler Filter D/SF-01 14” x 12 Plates
SS-316
22. Pressure Nutsche Filter D/PNF-01 0.50 KL SS-316
23. Air Handling Unit D/AHU-01 8600 CFM -
24. Air Handling Unit D/AHU-02 2500 CFM -
25. Ventillation-1 D/V-01 4000 CFM -
26. Ventilation Exhaust D/VE-01 4000 CFM -
27. Ventillation-2 D/V-02 5700 CFM -
28. Ventilation Exhaust D/VE-02 5700 CFM -
29. Pressure Module-1 D/PM-01 1759 CFM -
30. Pressure Module-2 D/PM-02 800 CFM -
31. Pressure Module-3 D/PM-03 1889 CFM -
32. Pressure Module-4 D/PM-04 1038 CFM -
33. Pressure Module-5 D/PM-05 1759 CFM -
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 109 -
S.No Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
34. Pressure Module-6 D/PM-06 1759 CFM -
35. Pressure Module-7 D/PM-07 1889 CFM -
36. Pressure Module-8 D/PM-08 1889 CFM -
37. Pressure Module-9 D/PM-09 1889 CFM -
38. Dynamic Pass Box D/DPB-01 3’ X 3” X 3’ SS - 304
39. Dynamic Pass Box D/DPB-02 3’ X 3” X 3’ SS - 304
40. Static Pass Box D/SPB-01 3’ X 3” X 3’ SS - 304
41. Air Shower D/AS-01 2 persons GI powder coated
42. Air shower D/AS-02 2 persons GI powder coated
43. Air shower D/AS-03 2 persons GI powder coated
44. Air shower D/AS-04 2 persons GI powder coated
3) E- Block Equipment
Sl.No. Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
1. SS Reactor E/RE-01 6.0 KL SS-316
2. SS Reactor E/RE-02 2.0 KL SS-316
3. SS Reactor E/RE-03 5.0 KL SS-316
4. SS Reactor E/RE-04 5.0 KL SS-316
5. GL Reactor E/RE-05 3.0 KL MSGL
6. GL Reactor E/RE-06 5.0 KL MSGL
7. GL Reactor E/RE-07 5.0 KL MSGL
8. SS Reactor E/RE-08 5.0 KL SS-316
9. GL Reactor E/RE-09 5.0 KL MSGL
10. SS Reactor E/RE-10 5.0 KL SS-316
11. SS Reactor E/RE-11 5.0 KL SS-316
12. SS Reactor E/RE-12 3.0 KL SS-316
13. GL Reactor E/RE-13 5.0 KL MSGL
14. SS Reactor E/RE-14 5.0 KL SS-316
15. Centrifuge E/CF-01 48” SS-316
16. Centrifuge E/CF-02 48” SS-316
17. Centrifuge E/CF-03 48” SS-316
18. Centrifuge E/CF-04 48” SS-316
19. Centrifuge E/CF-05 48” SS-316
20. Tray Dryer E/TD-01 96 Trays SS-316
21. Tray Dryer E/TD-02 96 Trays SS-316
22. Tray Dryer E/TD-03 96 Trays SS-316
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 110 -
23. Rotocone Vacuum drier E/RCVD-01 1500 Lt SS-316
24. Rotocone Vacuum drier E/RCVD-02 1500 Lt SS-316
25. Rotary Vacuum drier E/RVPD-01 1000 Lt SS-316
26. Sparkler Filter E/SF-01 23"X18 Plates
SS-316
27. Sparkler Filter E/SF-02 23"X18 Plates
SS-316
28. Sparkler Filter E/SF-03 23"X18 Plates
SS-316
29. Double cone Blender E/BL-01 1500 Lt SS-316
30. Multimill E/MM-01 50-250 Kg/hr
SS-316
31. Vibro Sifter E/VSF-01 50-200 Kg/hr
SS-316
32. Air Handling Unit E/AHU-01 7800 CFM -
33. Air Handling Unit E/AHU-02 6400 CFM -
34. Air Handling Unit E/AHU-03 7700 CFM -
35. Ventilation E/V-01 15000 CFM -
36. Ventilation Exhaust E/VE-01 15600 CFM -
37. Pressure Module E/PM-01 - -
38. Pressure Module E/PM-02 - -
39. Pressure Module E/PM-03 - -
40. Pressure Module E/PM-04 - -
41. Pressure Module E/PM-05 -
42. Pressure Module E/PM-06 -
43. Pressure Module E/PM-07 -
44. Pressure Module E/PM-08 -
45. Pressure Module E/PM-09 -
46. Pressure Module E/PM-10 - -
47. Pressure Module E/PM-11 - -
48. Pressure Module E/PM-12 - -
49. Air Shower E/AS-01 - GIPC
50. Air Shower E/AS-02 - GIPC
51. Dynamic Pass Box E/DPB-01 - SS-304
52. Dynamic Pass Box E/DPB-01 - SS-304
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 111 -
4) G- Block Equipment
Sl.No. Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
1. SS Reactor G/RE-01 3.0 KL SS-316
2. SS Reactor G/RE-02 5.0 KL SS-316
3. SS Reactor G/RE-03 5.0 KL SS-316
4. SS Reactor G/RE-04 5.0 KL SS-316
5. SS Reactor G/RE-05 5.0 KL SS-316
6. SS Reactor G/RE-06 5.0 KL SS-316
7. SS Reactor G/RE-07 3.0 KL SS-316
8. SS Reactor G/RE-08 3.0 KL SS-316
9. SS Reactor G/RE-09 3.0 KL SS-316
10. SS Reactor G/RE-10 5.0 KL SS-316
11. Centrifuge G/CF-01 48" SS-316
12. Centrifuge G/CF-02 48" SS-316
5) H- Block Equipment
Sl.No. Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
1. Stainless Steel Reactor H/RE-01 0.75 KL SS-316
2. Stainless Steel Reactor H/RE-02 0.75 KL SS-316
3. Stainless Steel Reactor H/RE-03 1.60 KL SS-316
4. Stainless Steel Reactor H/RE-04 1.60 KL SS-316
5. Stainless Steel Reactor H/RE-05 0.75 KL SS-316
6. Glass Lined Reactor H/RE-06 0.63 KL MSGL
7. Stainless Steel Reactor H/RE-07 0.25 KL SS-316
8. Glass Lined Reactor H/RE-08 2.0 KL MSGL
9. Glass Lined Reactor H/RE-09 0.16 KL MSGL
10. Glass Lined Reactor H/RE-10 1.60 KL MSGL
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 112 -
11. Glass Lined Reactor H/RE-11 0.63 KL MSGL
12. Glass Lined Reactor H/RE-12 1.60 KL MSGL
13. Glass Lined Reactor H/RE-13 0.16 KL MSGL
14. Glass Lined Reactor H/RE-14 0.25 KL MSGL
15. Stainless Steel Reactor H/RE-15 0.25 KL SS-316
16. Hydrogenator H/HY-01 0.25KL SS-316 L
17. De-Contamination Tank H/DCT-01 0.50 KL MSHL
18. Pressure Nutsche Filter H/PNF-01 0.50 KL SS-316
19. Pressure Nutsche Filter H/PNF-02 0.10 KL SS-316
20. Agitated Nutsche Filter and drier H/ANFD-01 0.30 m2 SS-316
21. Charging Isolator H/CIS-01 - SS-316
22. Isolator H/IS-01 - SS-316
23. Multi Mill H/ISMM-01 - SS-316
24. Vibro Sifter H/ISVSF-01 - SS-316
25. Pack-Off Isolator H/PIS-01 - SS-316
26. Cage Blender H/CBL-01 - SS-316
27. Vacuum Tray Drier H/VTD-01 24 Trays SS-316
28. Vacuum Tray Drier H/VTD-02 12 Trays SS-316
29. Vacuum Tray Drier H/VTD-03 12 Trays SS-316
30. Vacuum Tray Drier H/VTD-04 12 Trays SS-316
31. SS Centrifuge H/CF-01 36” Dia SS-316
32. Robo Filter H/RF-01 600 X 600 mm SS-316
33. Robo Filter H/RF-02 750 X 750 mm SS-316
34. Robo Filter H/RF-03 750 X 750 mm SS-316
35. Robo Filter H/RF-04 750 X 750 mm SS-316
36. Sparkler Filter H/SF-01 14” x 12 Plates SS-316
37. Sparkler Filter H/SF-02 14” x 12 Plates SS-316
38. Sparkler Filter H/SF-03 14” x 12 Plates SS-316
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 113 -
39. Sparkler Filter H/SF-04 8” x 10 Plates SS-316
40. Air Shower H/AS-01 - GIPC
41. Air Shower H/AS-02 - GIPC
42. Air Shower H/AS-03 - GIPC
43. Air Shower H/AS-04 - GIPC
44. Air Handling Unit H/AHU-01 9000 CFM -
45. Air Handling Unit H/AHU-02 1100 CFM -
46. Ventilation Unit H/V-01 4000 CFM -
47. Ventilation Unit H/V-02 6000 CFM -
48. Ventilation Exhaust Unit H/VE-01 4000 CFM -
49. Ventilation Exhaust Unit H/VE-02 6000 CFM -
50. Pressure Module H/PM-01 2065 CFM -
51. Pressure Module H/PM-02 2065 CFM -
52. Pressure Module H/PM-03 2065 CFM -
53. Pressure Module H/PM-04 900 CFM -
54. Pressure Module H/PM-05 1734 CFM -
55. Pressure Module H/PM-06 1734 CFM -
56. Pressure Module H/PM-07 1734 CFM -
57. Pressure Module H/PM-08 1734 CFM -
58. Pressure Module H/PM-09 1734 CFM -
59. Pressure Module H/PM-10 1087 CFM -
60. Static Pass Box H/SPB-01 - SS-304
61. Dynamic Pass Box H/DPB-02 - SS-304
62. Dynamic Pass Box H/DPB-03 - SS-304
63. Centrifuge H/CF-02 18” SS-316
6) I- Block Equipment
Sl.No. Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
1. Glass lined reactor I/RE-01 0.10 KL MSGL
2. Glass lined reactor I/RE-02 0.16 KL MSGL
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 114 -
3. Glass lined reactor I/RE-03 0.16 KL MSGL
4. Glass lined reactor I/RE-04 1.60 KL MSGL
5. Glass lined reactor I/RE-05 1.60 KL MSGL
6. Glass lined reactor I/RE-07 0.50 KL MSGL
7. Glass lined reactor I/RE-08 0.50 KL MSGL
8. Glass lined reactor I/RE-09 0.10 KL MSGL
9. Glass lined reactor I/RE-10 0.50 KL MSGL
10. Glass lined reactor I/RE-11 0.50 KL MSGL
11. Glass lined reactor I/RE-12 0.10 KL MSGL
12. Stainless steel reactor I/RE-13 0.10 KL SS-316
13. Stainless steel reactor I/RE-14 0.10 KL SS-316
14. Agitated Nutsche Filter Drier I/ANFD-01 0.10 m2 SS-316
15. Charging Isolator I/CIS-01 - SS-316
16. Pack off Isolator I/PIS-01 - SS-316
17. Isolator I/IS-01 - SS-316
18. Isolator Nutsche Filter I/ISNF-01 50 L SS-316
19. Isolator Vacuum tray drier I/ISVTD-01 12 Tray SS-316
20. Isolator Multi mill I/ISMM-01 - SS-316
21. Isolator Vibro sifter I/ISVSF-01 - SS-316
22. Vacuum tray drier I/VTD-01 12 Trays SS-316
23. Vacuum tray drier I/VTD-02 12 Trays SS-316
24. Vacuum tray drier I/VTD-03 12 Trays SS-316
25. Robo-filter I/RF-01 450 x 450
mm SS-316
26. Robo-filter I/RF-02 600 x 600
mm SS-316
27. Robo-filter I/RF-03 600 x 600
mm SS-316
28. Robo-filter I/RF-04 600 x 600
mm SS-316
29. Robo-filter I/RF-05 600 x 600
mm SS-316
30. Sparkler Filter I/SF-01 14” x 12 Plates
SS-316
31. Sparkler Filter I/SF-02 8” x 10 Plates SS-316
32. Cage Blender I/CBL-01 50 L SS-316
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 115 -
33. Air Handling Unit I/AHU-01 9000 CFM -
34. Air Handling Unit I/AHU-02 2500 CFM -
35. Ventilation I/V-01 4000 CFM -
36. Ventilation I/V-02 6000 CFM -
37. Ventilation Exhaust I/VE-01 4000 CFM -
38. Ventilation Exhaust I/VE-02 6000 CFM -
39. Pressure Module I/PM-01 500 CFM -
40. Pressure Module I/PM-02 1881 CFM -
41. Pressure Module I/PM-03 1881 CFM -
42. Pressure Module I/PM-04 1881 CFM -
43. Pressure Module I/PM-05 507 CFM -
44. Pressure Module I/PM-06 1705 CFM -
45. Pressure Module I/PM-07 1705 CFM -
46. Pressure Module I/PM-08 1705 CFM -
47. Pressure Module I/PM-09 1705 CFM -
48. Pressure Module I/PM-10 1705 CFM -
49. Static Pass Box I/PB-01 - SS-304
50. Dynamic Pass Box I/PB-02 - SS-304
51. Dynamic Pass Box I/PB-03 - SS-304
52. Air Shower I/AS-01 - GIPC
53. Air Shower I/AS-02 - GIPC
54. Air Shower I/AS-03 - GIPC
55. Air Shower I/AS-04 - GIPC
56. De-Contamination Tank I/DCT-01 1.0KL MSHL
7) List Of Utilities
Sl.No. Name of the equipment EQ.ID Capacity
1. Boiler P/BO-01 10 Ton
2. Boiler P/BO-02 6 Ton
3. RO Plant P/RO-01 20 m3/hr
4. Air compressor J/AC-01 40 HP
5. Air compressor J/AC-02 60 HP
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 116 -
6. Air Compressor J/AC-03 100 HP
7. N2 Plant J/AC-04 120 Nm3/hr
8. VAM J/VAM-01 470 TR
9. AVAM J/AVAM-01 100 TR
10. NH3 Compression system J/CH-03 100
8) AO - block equipment
Sl. No.
Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
1. Stainless Steel Reactor AO/RE-01 4 KL SS - 316
2. Hydrogenator AO/HY-01 4 KL SS - 316
3. Stainless Steel Reactor AO/RE-03 5 KL SS - 316
4. Stainless Steel Reactor AO/RE-04 4 KL SS - 316
5. Stainless Steel Reactor AO/RE-05 3 KL SS - 316
6. Stainless Steel Reactor AO/RE-06 5 KL SS - 316
7. Stainless Steel Reactor AO/RE-07 4 KL SS-316
8. Stainless Steel Reactor AO/RE-08 7.5 KL SS-316
9. Stainless Steel Reactor AO/RE-09 4 KL SS-316
10. Stainless Steel Reactor AO/RE-10 5 KL SS-316
11. Pressure Filter Nutsche type AO/PNF-01 2000 Ltr SS-316
12. Pressure Filter Nutsche type AO/PNF-02 200 Ltr SS-316
13. Pressure Filter Nutsche type AO/PNF-03 200 Ltr SS-316
14. Filter Leaf type AO/LF-01 5 sq-mtr SS-316
15. Agitated Nutsche Filter Drier AO/ANFD-01 2.5 KL SS316
16. Multimill AO/MM-01 500-1000 Kg/h SS316
17. Double Cone Blender AO/BL-01 2 KL SS316
18. VSF AO/VSF-01 150 to 600 kg/hr SS316
19. Ion Exchange System AO/IX-01 3600 liter per cycle -
20. Bipolar membrane Electrodilyzer System
AO/BPED-01 8059 L -
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 117 -
21. Sparkler Filter AO/SF-01 14” x 9 Plates SS316
22. Evaporator AO/EV-01 1800kgs/Hr SS316
23. Ultra Filtration System AO/UF-01 1000 Litrs/ Hr /Kpa -
24. Drum Dryer AO/DD-01 8Drum (200 ltr
each) SS316
9) AI – Block Equipment
Sl.No. Name of the Equipment EQ-ID Capacity Model
1. GL Reactor AI/RE-01 0.16 KL MSGL
2. GL Reactor AI/RE-02 0.10 KL MSGL
3. GL Reactor AI/RE-03 0.10 KL MSGL
4. GL Reactor AI/RE-04 0.063 KL MSGL
5. SS Reactor AI/RE-05 0.10 KL SS 316
6. GL Reactor AI/RE-06 30 Lt All Glass
7. GL Reactor AI/RE-07 30 Lt All Glass
8. GL Reactor AI/RE-08 10 Lt All Glass
9. GL Reactor AI/RE-09 05 Lt All Glass
10. GL Reactor AI/RE-10 0.10 KL MSGL
11. GL Reactor AI/RE-11 10 Lt All Glass
12. Nutsche Filter Isolator AI/ISNF-01 -- SS-316
13. Vacuum Tray Drier Isolator AI/ISVTD-01` -- SS-316
14. Isolator AI/IS-01 -- SS-316
15. Pack off Isolator AI/PIS-01 -- SS-316
16. Vacuum Tray Drier AI/VTD-01 12 Trays SS-316
17. Vacuum Tray Drier AI/VTD-02 12 Trays SS-316
18. Vacuum Tray Drier AI/VTD-03 12 Trays SS-316
19. Vacuum Tray Drier AI/VTD-04 12 Trays SS-316
20. Pressure Nutsche Filter AI/PNF-01 200 Lt SS-316
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 118 -
21. Pressure Nutsche Filter AI/PNF-02 60 Lt SS-316
22. Nutsche Filter AI/NF-01 50 Lt SS-316
23. Nutsche Filter AI/NF-02 50 Lt SS-316
24. Multi Mill AI/MM-01 5-25 Kg/hr SS-316
25. Vibro Shifter AI/VSF-01 12” SS-316
26. Double Cone Blender AI/DBL-01 15 Lt SS-316
27. Sparkler Filter AI/SF-03 8” x 9 Plates SS-316
28. Sparkler Filter AI/SF-04 8” x 4 Plates SS-316
29. Air Shower AI/AS-01 2 Persons G.I Powder
coated
30. Air Shower AI/AS-02 2 Persons G.I Powder
coated
31. Air Shower AI/AS-03 2 Persons G.I Powder
coated
32. Dynamic Pass Box AI/DPB-01 -- SS-316
33. Air Handling Unit AI/AHU-01 7000 CFM --
34. Air Handling Unit AI/AHU-02 1500 CFM --
35. Air Handling Unit AI/AHU-03 2500 CFM --
36. Air Handling Unit AI/AHU-04 15000 CFM --
10) AJ – Block Equipment
Sl. No.
Name of the Equipment EQ-ID Capacity Model
1. Stainless Steel Reactor AJ/RE-01 6.0KL SS -316 L
2. Stainless Steel Reactor AJ/RE-02 6.0KL SS -316 L
3. Stainless Steel Reactor AJ/RE-03 6.0KL SS -316 L
4. Stainless Steel Reactor AJ/RE-04 4.0KL SS -316 L
5. Glass Lined Reactor AJ/RE-05 6.3KL MSGL
6. Glass Lined Reactor AJ/RE-06 6.3 KL MSGL
7. Centrifuge AJ/CF-01 Ø 48'' SS -316
8. Centrifuge AJ/CF-02 Ø48'' SS -316
9. Centrifuge AJ/CF-03 Ø 48'' SS -316, Halar Lined
10. Tray Drier AJ/TD-01 96 Trays SS-316
11. Tray Drier AJ/TD-02 96 Trays SS-316
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 119 -
12. Tray Drier AJ/TD-03 96 Trays SS-316
13. Tray Drier AJ/TD-04 96 Trays SS-316
11) AM- Block Equipment
Sl. No.
Name of the Equipment EQ-ID Capacity Model
1 All Glass Reactor AM/RE-01 10 L All Glass
2 All Glass Reactor AM/RE-02 20 L All Glass
3 All Glass Reactor AM/RE-03 20 L All Glass
4 All Glass Reactor AM/RE-04 50 L All Glass
5 All Glass Reactor AM/RE-05 50 L All Glass
6 Stainless Steel Reactor AM/RE-06 100 L SS-316
7 Stainless Steel Reactor AM/RE-07 50 L SS-316
8 All Glass Reactor AM/RE-08 10 L All Glass
9 Centrifuge AM/CF-01 18” SS-316
10 Centrifuge AM/CF-02 12” SS-316
11 Vacuum Tray Drier AM/VTD-01 4 Tray SS-316
12 Vacuum Tray Drier AM/VTD-02 4 Tray SS-316
13 Dynamic Pass Box AM/DPB-01 - SS-316
14 Air Handling Unit AM/AHU-01 2500 CFM -
12) R1- block equipment
1 All Glass Reactor R1/RE-01 20 Liters GLASS
2 All Glass Reactor R1/RE-02 20 Liters GLASS
3 All Glass Reactor R1/RE-03 50 Liters GLASS
4 All Glass Reactor R1/RE-04 50 Liters GLASS
5 All Glass Reactor R1/RE-05 10 Liters GLASS
6 All Glass Reactor R1/RE-06 10 Liters GLASS
7 Stainless Steel Reactor R1/RE-07 100 L SS 316
8 Vacuum Try Dryer R1/VTD-01 3 TRAYS SS 316
9 Air Handling Unit R1AHU-01 15000 CFM -------
10 Vacuum Tray Drier R1/VTD-02 4 Trays SS 316
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 120 -
Proposed list:
1) AR-Block Equipment:
Sl.No. Name of the Equipment Equip.ID Capacity MOC
1. Stainless Steel Reactor AR/RE-01 2.0 KL SS-316
2. Stainless Steel Reactor AR/RE-02 2.0 KL SS-316
3. Glass Lined Reactor AR/RE-03 3.0 KL MSGL
4. Stainless Steel Reactor AR/RE-05 4.0 KL SS-316
5. Stainless Steel Reactor AR/RE-06 4.0 KL SS-316
6. Stainless Steel Reactor AR/RE-11 5.0 KL SS-316
7. Stainless Steel Reactor AR/RE-12 5.0 KL SS-316
8. Stainless Steel Reactor AR/RE-13 5.0 KL SS-316
9. Air Handling Unit AR/AHU-
01 7300 CFM -
10. Pass Box AR/PB-01 - SS 304
11. Ventilation AR/V-01 15600 CFM -
12. Ventilation Exhaust AR/VE-01 15600 CFM -
13. Sparkler Filter AR/SF-01 18" x 23 Plates SS-316
14. Centrifuge AR/CF-01 48” SS-316
15. Centrifuge AR/CF-02 48” SS-316
16. Centrifuge AR/CF-03 48” SS-316
17. Roto-cone Vacuum Drier AR/RCVD-
01 1500 L SS-316
18. Agitated Nutsche Filter AR/ANFD-
01 2 m2 SS-316
19. Agitated Nutsche Filter AR/ANFD-
02 2 m2 SS-316
20. Pressure Module AR/PM-01 2100 CFM -
21. Pressure Module AR/PM-02 2100 CFM -
22. Pressure Module AR/PM-03 2100 CFM -
23. Pressure Module AR/PM-04 2100 CFM -
24. Air Shower AR/AS-02 - GI Powder
Coated
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 121 -
25. Blender AR/BL-01 1500 L SS-316
26. Vacuum Tray Drier AR/VTD-01 96 Trays SS 316
27. Vacuum Tray Drier AR/VTD-02 96 Trays SS 316
28. Dynamic Pass Box AR/DPB-01 -- SS 304
2) Q-Block Equipments:
Sl.No. Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
1. SS Reactor Q/RE-03 5.0 KL SS-316
2. SS Reactor Q/RE-04 5.0 KL SS-316
3. GL Reactor Q/RE-05 3.0 KL MSGL
4. GL Reactor Q/RE-06 5.0 KL MSGL
5. GL Reactor Q/RE-07 5.0 KL MSGL
6. SS Reactor Q/RE-08 5.0 KL SS-316
7. GL Reactor Q/RE-09 5.0 KL MSGL
8. SS Reactor Q/RE-10 10.0 KL SS-316
9. SS Reactor Q/RE-11 10.0 KL SS-316
10. SS Reactor Q/RE-12 3.0 KL SS-316
11. GL Reactor Q/RE-13 5.0 KL MSGL
12. SS Reactor Q/RE-14 5.0 KL SS-316
13. Centrifuge Q/CF-01 48” SS-316
14. Centrifuge Q/CF-02 48” SS-316
15. Centrifuge Q/CF-03 48” SS-316
16. Centrifuge Q/CF-04 48” SS-316
17. Centrifuge Q/CF-05 48” SS-316
18. Tray Dryer Q/TD-01 96 Trays SS-316
19. Tray Dryer Q/TD-02 96 Trays SS-316
20. Tray Dryer Q/TD-03 96 Trays SS-316
21. Rotocone Vacuum drier Q/RCVD-01 1500 Lt SS-316
22. Rotocone Vacuum drier Q/RCVD-02 1500 Lt SS-316
23. Rotary Vacuum drier Q/RVPD-01 1000 Lt SS-316
24. Sparkler Filter Q/SF-01 23"X18 Plates
SS-316
25. Sparkler Filter Q/SF-02 23"X18 Plates
SS-316
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 122 -
26. Sparkler Filter Q/SF-03 23"X18 Plates
SS-316
27. Double cone Blender Q/BL-01 1500 Lt SS-316
28. Multimill Q/MM-01 50-250 Kg/hr
SS-316
29. Vibro Sifter Q/VSF-01 50-200 Kg/hr
SS-316
30. Air Handling Unit Q/AHU-01 7800 CFM -
31. Air Handling Unit Q/AHU-02 6400 CFM -
32. Air Handling Unit Q/AHU-03 7700 CFM -
33. Ventilation Q/V-01 15000 CFM -
34. Ventilation Exhaust Q/VE-01 15600 CFM -
35. Pressure Module Q/PM-01 - -
36. Pressure Module Q/PM-02 - -
37. Pressure Module Q/PM-03 - -
38. Pressure Module Q/PM-04 - -
39. Pressure Module Q/PM-05 -
40. Pressure Module Q/PM-06 -
41. Pressure Module Q/PM-07 -
42. Pressure Module Q/PM-08 -
43. Pressure Module Q/PM-09 -
44. Pressure Module Q/PM-10 - -
45. Pressure Module Q/PM-11 - -
46. Pressure Module Q/PM-12 - -
47. Air Shower Q/AS-01 - GIPC
48. Air Shower Q/AS-02 - GIPC
49. Dynamic Pass Box Q/DPB-01 - SS-304
50. Dynamic Pass Box Q/DPB-01 - SS-304
3) AS-Block Equipments:
S.No Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
1. Glass Lined Reactor AS/RE-01 1.60 KL MSGL
2. Glass Lined Reactor AS/RE-02 4.0 KL MSGL
3. Glass Lined Reactor AS/RE-03 4.0 KL MSGL
4. Glass Lined Reactor AS/RE-10 6.3 KL MSGL
5. Glass Lined Reactor AS/RE-11 6.3 KL MSGL
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 123 -
S.No Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
6. Glass Lined Reactor AS/RE-12 4.0 KL MSGL
7. Agitated Nutsche Filter and Drier AS/ANFD-02
2 m2 SS-316
8. Charging Isolator AS/CIS-01 - SS-316
9. Pack Off Isolator AS/PIS-01 - SS-316
10. Isolator AS/IS-01 - SS-316
11. Isolator Multimill AS/ISMM-01
5-25 / Hr SS-316
12. Isolator Vibrosifter AS/ISVSF-01
- SS-316
13. Centrifuge Isolator AS/ISCF-01 - SS-316
14. Vacuum Tray Dryer Isolator AS/ISVTD-01
- SS-316
15. Vacuum Tray Dryer AS/VTD-02 12 Trays SS-316
16. Vacuum Tray Dryer AS/VTD-03 12 Trays SS-316
17. Vacuum Tray Dryer AS/VTD-04 140 Trays SS-316
18. Centrifuge AS/CF-01 36” SS-316
19. Centrifuge AS/CF-02 36” SS-316
20. Robo Filter AS/RF-01 150 Ltrs SS316
21. Sparkler Filter AS/SF-01 14” x 12 Plates
SS-316
22. Pressure Nutsche Filter AS/PNF-01 0.50 KL SS-316
23. Air Handling Unit AS/AHU-01 8600 CFM -
24. Air Handling Unit AS/AHU-02 2500 CFM -
25. Ventillation-1 AS/V-01 4000 CFM -
26. Ventilation Exhaust AS/VE-01 4000 CFM -
27. Ventillation-2 D/V-02 5700 CFM -
28. Ventilation Exhaust AS/VE-02 5700 CFM -
29. Pressure Module-1 AS/PM-01 1759 CFM -
30. Pressure Module-2 AS/PM-02 800 CFM -
31. Pressure Module-3 AS/PM-03 1889 CFM -
32. Pressure Module-4 AS/PM-04 1038 CFM -
33. Pressure Module-5 AS/PM-05 1759 CFM -
34. Pressure Module-6 AS/PM-06 1759 CFM -
35. Pressure Module-7 AS/PM-07 1889 CFM -
36. Pressure Module-8 AS/PM-08 1889 CFM -
37. Pressure Module-9 AS/PM-09 1889 CFM -
38. Dynamic Pass Box AS/DPB-01 3’ X 3” X 3’ SS - 304
39. Dynamic Pass Box AS/DPB-02 3’ X 3” X 3’ SS - 304
40. Static Pass Box AS/SPB-01 3’ X 3” X 3’ SS - 304
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 124 -
S.No Name of the Equipment EQ.ID Capacity MOC
41. Air Shower AS/AS-01 2 persons GI
powder coated
42. Air shower AS/AS-02 2 persons GI
powder coated
43. Air shower AS/AS-03 2 persons GI
powder coated
44. Air shower AS/AS-04 2 persons GI
powder coated
No of Products and No. of Reactors:
S.N Proposed Product Name
Manufacturing Qty
in MT/Year
Batch size
Kg/batch
No of Batch’s
No’s per year
Reactors used No’s
Capacity of Reactors&
All glass Reactors
Occupancy time
1 Ambroxol HCl 10 500 20 3 SSR- 2no’s GLR-1 no’s
30 days per year
2 Anasrozole 0.1 10 100 6 GLR-6 no’s 100 days per year
3 Gemcitabine HCl 0.1 30 36 5 SSR- 2 no’s GLR-3 no’s
75days per Year
4 Paclitaxel 0.1 10 100
4 GLR-4 no’s (1.5KL-4
no’s)
120 days per year
5 Temozolabide 0.1 10 100 2 SSR- 2no’s
40 days per year
6 Bicalutamide 0.5 10 50 1 GLR-1 no’s 120 days per year
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 125 -
7 Docetaxel Trihydrate
0.1 10 100 3 GLR-3 no’s 120 days per year
8 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
60 250 240 13 SSR- 13 no’s
300 days per year
9 Bendamustine hcl
0.2 12 168 1 GLR-1 no’s (1.5 KL)
100 days per year
10 Bortzomib 0.005 0.1 50 5 All Glass Reactor 5
no’s (0.5 Lit)
60 days per year
11 Capacitabine 60 250 240 3 GLR-3 no’s (5 Kl-2 no’s &
3 Kl 1no’s)
300 days per year
12 Imatinib 5 100 50 3 GLR-3 no’s (5 Kl-1 no’s& 3 Kl -2 no’s)
30 days per year
13 Lenalidomide 0.5 100 50 3 GLR-2 no’s (2 Kl -1 no’s
& (3 Kl -1 no’s) SSR-1 no’s
(5 Kl -1 no’s)
30 days per year
14 Letrozole 0.05 1 50 2 GLR-2 no’s (0.5KL-2
no’s)
50 days per year
15 PMD 0.25 10 25 3 GLR-3 no’s (1.5 KL-3
no’s)
40 days per year
16 Decitabine 0.01 0.5 20
5 GLR-5 no’s (0.5 KL-5
no’s)
30 days per year
17 Cytrabine 0.05 0.96 52 2 GLR-2 no’s (0.5 KL-2
no’s)
60 days per year
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 126 -
18 Cabazitaxel 0.01 0.4 26 4 GLR-2 no’s (0.5 KL-2
no’s)
60 days per year
19 Acebrophylline 10 250 40 3 GLR-3 no’s (0.5 KL-3
no’s)
60 days per year
20 Cloferabine 0.01 0.43 24 2 All glass reactor-2
no’s (100lts-2 no’s)
50 days per year
21 Melphalan 0.025 0.55 45 5 GLR-1 no’s (1.0 KL-1
no’s)
60 days per year
22 Cyclophosphamide
1 4.5 228
3 All glass reactor-3
no’s (100lts-3
no’s)
300 days per year
23 Tenfovir 50 250 200 2 GLR-2 no’s 200 days per year
24 PMK 0.25 2 125 3 GLR-3 no’s (100 lit-3
no’s)
35 days per year
25 Erlotonib 2 25 80 7 GLR-1 no’s SSR-6 no’s
150 days per year
26 Emtricitabine 1 250 4 4 SSR-1 no’s GLR-3 no’s
25 days per year
27 Dimethyl fumarate
12 250 48 2 SSR-2 no’s 75days per year
28 Elvitegravir 1 250 4 12 GLR-12 no’s SSR-4 no’s
40 days per year
29 Cobicistat 100 250 400 7 GLR-5 no’s SSR-2 no’s
320 days per year
30 Busulfan 0.05 1 50 2 AGR-2 no’s 80 days per year
31 Zoledranic Acid 0.005 1 50 4 AGR-4 no’s 25 days per year
32 Tranexamic Acid 100 500 200 5 SSR-2 no’s GLR-3 no’s
300 days per year
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 127 -
33 Sunitinib Malate 3 50 60 3 SSR-3 no’s 60 days per year
34 Sorafenib Tosylate
3 100 30 3 SSR-3 no’s 60 days per year
35 Abiraterone acetate
2 30 67 5 GLR 5 no’s 45 days per year
Availability of Reactors:
S. No. Capacity of the reactors
SS R (No’s)
GLR (No’s)
All Glass (No’s)
1 100 Lit & below 3 5 12
2 0.5 & KL below 8 19 0
3 1.5 KL 2 6 0
4 2.0 KL 5 1 0
5 3.0 KL 7 3 0
6 4.0 KL 13 8 0
7 5.0 KL 23 6 0
8 6.0 KL 5 5 0
9 7.5 KL 1 0 0
10 10.0 KL 2 0 0
64 53 12
The total No of Reactors available is 129
The total No Of reactors required is 140
As the products are taken on campaign basis, the ocuupation of the products is not through
out the year for all the products, all the products can be manufactured in the given equipment
2.8 PROJECT DESCRIPTION INCLUDING DRAWINGS SHOWING PROJECT LAYOUT,
COMPONENTS OF PROJECT, SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATIONS OF THE FEASIBILITY DRAWING
GIVING INFORMATION IMPORTANT FOR EIA PURPOSE
2.8.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION INCLUDING DRAWINGS SHOWING PROJECT LAYOUT,
COMPONENTS OF PROJECT
Site plan drawing showing project site layout & various components is appended as Fig 2.1 in
this chapter.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 128 -
2.8.2 SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATIONS OF THE FEASIBILITY DRAWING
A schematic representation of the overall feasibility and environmental assessment process is
shown in Figure 2.3.
Fig 2.3: Feasibility & environmental assessment process
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 129 -
2.9 MITIGATION MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT TO MEET
ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS, ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING CONDITIONS OR OTHER EIA
REQUIREMENTS (AS REQUIRED BY THE SCOPE)
2.9.1. WATER DEMAND AND WASTEWATER/EFFLUENT DISCHARGE
2.9.1.1. SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY
The water demand is met from KIADB water supply. The requirement of water for the unit is
for domestic, industrial purposes.
2.9.1.2 WATER DEMAND AND WASTEWATER DISCHARGE DURING OPERATION PHASE
Source of water supply: KIADB Water Supply
Total number of employees: 600 people
Per capita water demand: 50 LPCD
The total quantity of water required for the industry is about 214.6 KLD. The break-up of the consumption of water is as presented in below table 2.13.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 130 -
Table 2.13: Water consumption and discharge
Sl. No.
Purpose Total Quantity LPD( Intal Water)
Recirculation /Recycle LPD
Loss/Consumption/Evaporation /Daily Make Up Water Etc LPD
Wastewater Generation In LPD
I Domestic (Toilet, Canteen etc.)
30,000
30,000 25,000
II. Gardening/Landscape development
15,000
15,000 -
III Industrial purpose 5,32,500 1,69,600 1,76,000
1 DM water/ Softener/RO plant
30,000 - 30,000 30,000
A Process 1,13,000 - 1,13,000 1,08,000 (Remaining
9,000 is By product)
B Washing/ Cleaning
12,500 - 12,500 12,500
C Boiler feed Boiler water = 2,16,000 =(2,16,000-
1,29,600 =86,400)
2,09,450 = 1,29,600 Condensate recycle + 79,850 *
6,550 10,000 Boiler Blow down (Boiler Blow down will be
used for Spraying on the
Ash)
D Cooling tower – 1 no.
1,55,500 = (1,55,500 –
1,41,450 = 14,050)
1,53,450 = 1,41,450 from
Recycled condensate water
from ZLD plant +12,000 LPD LTDS
ZLD recycled water)
2050 20,000 (bleed off)
2 Scrubber 3000 - 3000 3,000
3 R&D 2,500 - 2500 2,500
Grand Total 5,77,500 3,62,900 2,14,600 2,01,000
Note: * Water recycled back to the system from ZLD plant. LPD = L/day; KLD = kilo liter/day 38.25 KLD RO Rejects from Low Strength waste water ETP will be treated in High
Strength waste water ETP followed by MEE.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 131 -
ii) WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL DETAILS
The treatment methods and the final disposal of each type of wastewater generated is appended in the table 2.14 below
Table 2.14 : Sewage/effluent treatment and discharge
Type of wastewater
Source Quantity, KLD Treatment Re-use of treated wastewater
Low strength Process Effluent, Washing effluent & Domestic waste water
130.5 Treated in Effluent treatment palnt followed by Reverse Osmosis. Domestic waste is treated in ETP at the stage of Biological treatment.
cooling tower make-up & Boiler feed water etc.
High strength Process Effluent, R&D Effluent,
Scrubber wastes, LSWW ETP
RO(38.25 KLD ) reject & Shipa
Medicare Unit –I effluent.
84.75 KLD = 58.75 KLD
from this unit + 26 KLD From Unit-
I
Treated in Effluent treatment palnt followed by MEE.
High strength DM plant/ Softner rejects & Cooling tower bleed off.
50 KLD Treated in High rate Solids contact clarifier tank (HRSCC).
Note: - Additional 26 KLD Effluent from Shilpa Medicare Unit – I will be added to this Unit for further treatment and disposal and we have the permission for the same.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 132 -
Fig 2.4 WATER BALANCE CHART
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 133 -
2.9.2 PRODUCT-WISE WATER CONSUMPTION AND DISCHARGE
The Product-wise water consumption and effluent discharge is appended in below table 2.15.
Table 2.15: Product-wise water consumption and effluent discharge
S No Product
Batch-wise process water consumption & discharge (L/batch) No. of
batches/month
Monthly process water consumption & effluent discharge (L/month)
Stage Water
consumption Effluent
discharge Water
consumption Effluent discharge
1 Ambroxol HCl
I 400 562
1.7
680 955.4
II 20 106 34 180.2
Total 420 668 714 1135.6
2 Anastrozole
I 5 6
8
40 48
II 2 7.75 16 62
III 5 6 40 48
Total 12 19.75 96 158
3 Gemcitabine HCl
I 0 90
3
0 270
II 0 21.3 0 63.9
III 3.6 12.9 10.8 38.7
Total 3.6 124.2 10.8 372.6
4 Paclitaxel
I 0 0
8.3
0 0
II 0 0 0 0
III 12 12.1 99.6 100.43
IV 0 0 0 0
Total 12 12.1 99.6 100.43
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 134 -
5 Temozolomide
I 24 30.64
8
192 245.12
II 6 7 48 56
Total 30 37.64 240 301.12
6 Bicalutamide I 0 0
5 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0
7 Docetaxel trihydrate
I 0 24
8
0 192
II 0 0 0 0
III 24 24.2 192 193.6
Total 24 48.2 192 385.6
8
3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
I 0 0
20
0 0
II 0 0 0 0
III 300 220 6000 4400
IV 250 0 5000 0
V 150 110 3000 2200
VI 150 596.3 3000 11926
Total 850 926.3 17000 18526
9 Bendamusti HCl i 40 63.7
14 560 891.8
Total 40 63.7 560 891.8
10 Bortezomib
I 0 0.825
41.7
0 34.4025
II 0 0.742 0 30.9414
III 0.039 0.042 1.6263 1.7514
Total 0.039 1.609 1.6263 67.0953
11 Capecitabine
I 30 189.6
50
1500 9480
II 30 37.5 1500 1875
III 30 37 1500 1850
Total 90 264.1 4500 13205
12 Imatinib mesylate 1 0 38
41.7 0 1584.6
Total 0 0 0 0
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 135 -
13 Lenalidomide
I 0 0
41.7
0 0
II 25 26.9 1042.5 1121.73
Total 25 26.9 1042.5 1121.73
14 Letrozole
I 0 2.5
4.2
0 10.5
II 10 15.9 42 66.78
Total 10 18.4 42 77.28
15 Pemetrexed disodium
1 38.5 41.49
20.8
800.8 862.992
2 25 153.47 520 3192.176
3 13.6 13.03 282.88 271.024
Total 77.1 207.99 1603.68 4326.192
16 Dicitabine
I 0 4.38
1.7
0 7.446
II 150 193 255 328.1
III 200 218 8 370.6
IV 0 0 0 0
V 0 0 0 0
Total 350 415.38 263 706.146
17 Cytrabine
I 20 56
13 260 728
II 4.3 3.91 55.9 50.83
Total 24.3 59.91 315.9 778.83
18 Cabazitaxel
I 57 30.86
2.1
119.7 64.806
II 0 32.35 0 67.935
III 0 0 0 0
IV 0 0 0 0
Total 57 63.21 119.7 132.741
19 Acebrophylline
I 700 650
3.3 2310 2145
II 0 0 0 0
Total 700 650 2310 2145
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 136 -
20 Clofarabine
I 0 0
2
0 0
IA 0 0 0 0
II 0 29.39 0 58.78
III 0 0 0 0
Total 0 29.39 0 58.78
21 Melphalan
I 0 0
3.8
0 0
II 0 6 0 22.8
III 86 93.64 326.8 355.832
IV 0 0 0 0
V 0 0 0 0
Total 86 99.64 326.8 378.632
22 Cyclophosphamide
I 0 2.86
63.1
0 180.466
II 7.6 9.37 479.56 591.247
III 59.77 60.43 3771.487 3813.133
Total 67.37 72.66 4251.047 4584.846
23 Tenofovir
I 300 500
16.7
5010 8350
II 400 321.5 6680 5369.05
Total 700 821.5 11690 13719.05
24
Pemetrexed dipotassium
I 480 514.54
10.4
4992 5351.216
II 124.9 169.7 1298.96 1764.88
III 13.6 13 141.44 135.2
Total 618.5 697.24 6432.4 7251.296
25 Erlotonib HCl
I 500 600
6.7
3350 4020
II 0 0 0 0
III 600 400 4020 2680
IV 0 0 0 0
Total 1100 1000 7370 6700
26 Emtricitabine I 1000 1241 0.3 300 372.3
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 137 -
II 250 1084 75 325.2
Total 1250 2325 375 697.5
27 Dimethyl fumarate
I 0 0
4
0 0
II 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0
28 Elvitegravir
I 55.09 39.99
0.3
16.527 11.997
II 100 150 30 45
III 120 407 36 122.1
IV 70 60 21 18
V 150 130 45 39
VI 200 180 60 54
VIA 100 115.179 30 34.5537
Total 795.09 1082.169 238.527 324.6507
29 Cobicistat
I 17.712 19.352
33
584.496 638.616
II 46.552 55.772 1536.216 1840.476
III 9.16 11.26 302.28 371.58
IV 3.52 25.65 116.16 846.45
V 12.284 31.174 405.372 1028.742
VI 32.592 59.002 1075.536 1947.066
VII 66.352 89.922 2189.616 2967.426
Total 188.172 292.132 6209.676 9640.356
30 Busulfan
I 24 43.41
4.2
100.8 182.322
II 0 0 0 0
Total 24 43.41 100.8 182.322
31 Zolodranic Acid
I 29 46.56
0.4
11.6 18.624
II 0 0 0 0
III 0 0 0 0
IV 34.21 34.42 13.684 13.768
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 138 -
Total 63.21 80.98 25.284 32.392
32 Tranexamic acid
I 0 20
18.5
0 370
II 4429 5435 81936.5 100547.5
III 0 7429 0 137436.5
IV 128817.5 133959.5 2383123.75 2478250.75
V 0 2116.5 0 39155.25
VI 14951 14369 276593.5 265826.5
VII 5630 4080 104155 75480
Total 153827.5 167409 2845808.75 3097066.5
33 Sunitinib Malate
I 987.6 1060
12.5
12345 13250
II 530.6 540 6632.5 6750
III 0 0 0 0
Total 1518.2 1600 18977.5 20000
34 Sorafenib Tosylate
I 480 520
25
12000 13000
II 0 0 0 0
III 0 0 0 0
Total 480 520 12000 13000
35
Abiraterone acetate
I 4208.8 4252.22
2.5
10522 10630.55
II 3100 3930.4 7750 9826
III 1456.8 1838.22 218520 4595.55
IV 1400 1426.52 210000 3566.3
IV(purification) 620 1262 1550 3155
Total 10785.6 12709.36 448342 31773.4
Qty/month 3391258.59 3249840.889
Qty/day 113041.95 108328.0296
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 139 -
Note: Considering no. of working days/month = 30
1. Daily process water consumption = 3391258.59/30 = 1,13,041.95 LPD 2. Daily process effluent discharge =3249840.889/30 = 1,08,328.0296 LPD 3. Scrubber effluent: 3000 LPD, if all products runs continuously. 4. R&D effluent: 2500 LPD.
2.9.2. (A) Raw material to product and product to waste generation ratio for each product
Table :- 2.15.A Raw materials to waste & Product to waste generation Ratio & Percentage
Raw materials to waste & Product to waste generation Ratio & Percentage
Products Product qty.
KG/Annum
Raw meterial Consumption
KG/Annum
Weste genartion Quatity Kg/Annum Toal waste genaration KG/annum
raw material to Waste
genaration Ratio
raw material to Waste
genaration %
product to waste
generation ratio
product to waste
generation %
Waste water Residue By products spent corbon
Solvent loss
Ambroxol HCl 10000 35360 11740 0 1620 80 2760 13440 0.3801 38.01 0.17 17.0
Anasrozole 100 37550 18000 0 5300 0 7000 23300 0.6205 62.05 53.00 5300.0
Gemcitabine HCl 100 15612.48 7452 0 1296 1086.5 1620 9834.48 0.6299 62.99 23.82 2382.5
Paclitaxel 100 25340 12100 900 4050 0 2990 17050 0.6728 67.28 49.50 4950.0
Temozolabide 100 41600 31840 160 5800 200 600 38000 0.9135 91.35 61.60 6160.0
Bicalutamide 500 1100 0 0 350 0 250 350 0.3182 31.82 0.70 70.0
Docetaxel Trihydrate
100 98400 48200 150 24100 0 22150 72450 0.7363 73.63 242.50 24250.0
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 140 -
Ursodeoxycholic Acid
60000 1624114 79512 19.2 841920 0 25596 921451.2 0.5674 56.74 14.03 1403.2
Bendamustine hcl 200 109200 10716 168 0 0 0 10884 0.0997 9.97 0.84 84.0
Bortzomib 5 169 139.35 6 7.5 0 7.5 152.85 0.9044 90.44 2.70 270.0
Capacitabine 60000 1064400 171360 58080 305736 0 324000 535176 0.5028 50.28 6.06 606.4
Imatinib 5000 28500 0 0 19000 500 4000 19500 0.6842 68.42 3.90 390.0
Lenalidomide 500 170500 134500 10500 0 500 5500 145500 0.8534 85.34 22.00 2200.0
Letrozole 50 1215 600 15 320 0 80 935 0.7695 76.95 6.70 670.0
PMD 250 27452.5 23900 100 0 0 2295 24000 0.8742 87.42 0.40 40.0
Decitabine 10 14571.2 7420 24 4633.2 10 2000 12087.2 0.8295 82.95 466.72 46672.0
Cytrabine 50 12277.2 9345.96 0 2811.12 0 7.8 12157.08 0.9902 99.02 56.22 5622.2
Cabazitaxel 10 6461.78 3547 0 0 0 2859.3 3547 0.5489 54.89 0.00 0.0
Acebrophylline 10000 53320 26000 0 6520 0 2800 32520 0.6099 60.99 0.65 65.2
Cloferabine 10 7199.8 709.36 214.32 2643.04 0 3521.52 3566.72 0.4954 49.54 285.74 28573.6
Melphalan 25 34577.15 4993.75 2796.25 1891.4 45 24384.1 9726.4 0.2813 28.13 189.31 18930.6
Cyclophosphamide 1000 36986.16 21119.64 6267.72 0 0 6643.2 27387.36 0.7405 74.05 6.27 626.8
Tenfovir 50000 2064000 180000 622530 1032470 0 134000 1835000 0.8891 88.91 33.10 3310.0
PMK 250 98501.75 79717.5 250 10653.6 87.5 6650.5 90708.6 0.9209 92.09 43.96 4396.4
Erlotonib 2000 184192.8 80000 880 59064 88.8 34160 140032.8 0.7603 76.03 30.02 3001.6
Emtricitabine 1000 110318 4400 140 4900 12 10720 9452 0.0857 8.57 5.05 505.2
Dimethyl fumarate 12000 71953.056 168 0 8869.056 0 36249.6 9037.056 0.1256 12.56 0.74 73.9
Elvitegravir 1000 141340.7332 3140.676 17.8997 22334.95292 12.8 10777.24 25506.32864 0.1805 18.05 22.37 2236.6
Cobicistat 100000 3616855.2 108824 3000 1598423.2 1508 1569200 1711755.2 0.4733 47.33 16.03 1602.9
Busulfan 50 8835.2 1839.65 0 0 101.05 875 1940.7 0.2197 21.97 2.02 202.1
Zoledranic Acid 5 13300.5 3749 75 1148 8 1047 4980 0.3744 37.44 246.20 24620.0
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 141 -
Tranexamic Acid 100000 24808800 13385800 9800 4042600 33548 42600 17471748 0.7043 70.43 40.86 4085.9
Sunitinib Malate 3000 188596 88870 9350 0 0 24280 98220 0.5208 52.08 3.12 311.7
Sorafenib Tosylate 3000 60030 17340 810 9462 0 23643 27612 0.4600 46.00 3.42 342.4
Abiraterone acetate
2000 1315573 799870.12 0 0 134 495668.7 800004.12 0.6081 60.81 0.07 6.7
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 142 -
2.9.2.1 PROCESS EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
The characteristics of the effluent(HTDS <DS) generated during the process of manufacture of APIs & Intermediates for the emerging scenario are described in the following table’s.
Table 2.16 Effluent characteristics for the emerging scenario
Wastewater characteristics LTDS Before treatment
After Biological & RO treatment
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), ppm 1500- 3,000 <30
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), ppm 5,000- 10,000 <250
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), ppm 5000 -10,000 <500
Suspended solids, ppm 1,000 - 2,500 <100
pH 6 - 12 5.5 to 9
Wastewater characteristics HTDS Before treatment
After Stripper, MEE and Biological treatment
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), ppm 12,000- 15,000 <30
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), ppm 20,000- 36,000 <250
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), ppm 20,000 -30,000 <500
Suspended solids, ppm 1,500 - 2,500 <100
pH 6 - 12 5.5 to 9
2.9.2.2 STORAGE FACILITIES PROVIDED FOR INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS
The industry proposes to provide adequate storage facilities for the industrial effluents. The details of which are appended below.
Storage facilities at the project site The industrial effluent is transferred to collection tanks through HDPE pipe lining from production blocks.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 143 -
2.9.2.3 TREATMENT SCHEME FOR WASTEWATER
Brief Treatment Process Description
The wastewater from the industry will be first passed through screen chamber for retaining the solid matter in the effluent followed by treatment in oil chamber where oil skimmer is provided to remove the oil content in the effluent. The wastewater is then made to flow to the equalization tank where floating aerator is provided for mixing of effluents. The effluent is then pumped to primary settling tank where hydrogen peroxide or bleach solution is dosed for removal of color and suspended solids in the effluent. The clear overflow from the primary settling tank is collected in a tank where pH correction is carried out. The treated effluent sends to Solvent Stripper in the stripper stripped the solvents in the effluent. The stripped effluent passed to the MEE (Multiple Effect Evaporation) concentrating the effluent. The condensate water collected in tank and it is used for cooling tower make ups and boiler ash moistening. The concentrate passed through to ATFD (Agitated Thin Film Drier), in drier concentrated effluent convert into dried salts. The dried salts bagged in Polyethylene bags and stored in dedicated Secured Hazardous waste storage room and send to the K.S.P.C.B approved land fill site.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 144 -
Fig 2.5 ETP FLOW CHART FOR HTDS FLOW DIAGRAM
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 145 -
Fig 2.6 Proposed LTDS Effluent Diagram Effluent treatment process Schematic flow diagram of LTDS Effluent and Domestic in
SML, Unit-2
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 146 -
2.9.2.4 ETP Details:
1. E.T.P. PRE TREATMENT(HTDS)
SNO EQUIPMENT NAME QTY SIZE/CAPACITY
1 Hrscc 01 DIA3X3MT H
2 Tube settler 01 2.5X2.5X2.5MT
3 Multigrade Filter 01 15M3/HR
4 Activated carbon filter 01 15 M³/HR
5 HCl dosing Tank 01 400 LITERS
6 Hypo Dosing Tank 01 400LITERS
7 Castic dosing Tank 01 400 LITERS
8 Poly dosing Tank With Agitater 01 400 LITERS
9 Fluculent Dosing Tank with Agitator 01 400 LITERS
10 Fluculent Dosing Tank with Agitator for Press
filter
01 400 LITERS
11 Bio sludge filter tank 01 20 KL
12 Chemical sludge Feeding tank 01 20 KL
13 Chemical sludge Press filter 01 31PLATES
14 Bio Sludge Press Filter 01 21PLATES
15 Flashmixer 01 1000KG/HR
16 Chemical sludge hopper 01 2560 MM LENGTH ×
1500 MM HEIGHT
17 Bio Sludge Hopper 01 1930 MM LENGTH ×
1500 MM HEIGHT
18 Mgf Feeding Tank 01 10KL
19 Stripper Feeding Tank 01 30KL
20 Acid Dosing Tank 01 Capacity 500 lit
21 Acid Dosing tank 01 Capacity 1000lit
22 Uria dosing tank 01 Capacity 0-40 LPh
23 Polu Floc-1203 dosingtank – 01 Capacity: 100 Liter s
24 Polu Floc 4120dosing tank 01 Capacity: 100 Liter s
25 Clarified water Tank 01 10M3
26 Filtered water tank 01 30M3
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 147 -
2. ETP Treatement (LTDS)
Sr.No Description Qty Specification
1 Heat exchanger By Client
01 Capacity: 8 m3/hr
2 Collection Tank/ Equalization tank By Client
01 Capacity: 67 m3
3 Acid dosing tank (New) 01 Capacity: 500 liters
4 Alkali dosing tank (New) 01 Capacity: 1000 liters
5 Phosphoric acid dosing tank (New) 01 Capacity: 1000 liters
6 Urea dosing tank (New) 01 Capacity: 1000 liters
7 AHR Media (New) 01 Capacity: 8 m3/hr
8 AHR Grid (New) 01 Capacity: 8 m3/hr
9 AHR tank cover (NEW) 01 Capacity: 8 m3/hr
10 AHR tank (Existing - By Client) 01 Capacity: Dia. 10.5m x 7.2m H
+ 0.5m (FB)
11 AHR Sludge transfer pump (New) 01 Capacity : 10 m3/Hr
Head:30M
12 AHR Gas blower (New) 2
(1W+1S)
suitable
13 Aeration Tank-I (Existing Adequate) 01 Capacity: 380 m3
14 MBBR Media for Aeration (NEW) 01 Suitable
15 Air Blower (equalization tank & Aeration tank (1.2 &3) - NEW
3 (2W+
1S)
Capacity: 700Nm3/HR @4500mmWC
16 Secondary clarifier - 1 (Existing-Adequate) 01 Capacity: 8.6 m3/Hr
17 Sludge transfer pump – (NEW) 01 Capacity : 7 m3/Hr
Head:30M
18 Aeration Tank-II(Existing-Adequate) 01 Capacity: 220 m3
19 Secondary Clarifier- 2 Existing – By Client 01 Capacity: 4m
20 Clarified water Tank New - By client
01 Capacity: 5m3
21 Flash mixer (New) 01 Capacity: 1m3
22 Polu Floc-1203 dosing tank – (NEW) 01
Capacity: 100 Liters
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 148 -
23 Polu Floc 4120dosing tank – (NEW) 01
Capacity: 100 Liters
24 HRSCC Mechanism – (NEW) 01 3 m Dia.
25 HRSCC shell –New by client (drawing by MOWS)
01 3 m Dia.
26 Clarified Water Tank – Exisitng by client 01
Capacity : 10 m3
27 Hypo dosing tank – (NEW) 01 Capacity: 100 Liters
28 Pressure sand filter – Existing - By Client 01 Dia. 1.0 m X 1.5 m height
29 Activated Carbon filter – Existing -By Client 01
Dia. 1.0 m X 1.8 m height
30 Filtered water tank - New By client 01 30 L
Multiple Effect Evaporation system:
Evaporation flow rate : 100 m3/day
System : Triple effect Falling film cum Forced
Circulation (2FF+1FC) Evaporator with Thermal vapour re-Compressor (TVR)
Feed Rate : 4797(kg/h)
Initial Solids : 3.16(%)
Max. Suspended Solids : < 1000(ppm)
Solids IN Concentrate : 40(%)
Concentrate Output : 379(kg/h)
Water Evaporation : 4418(kg/h)
Thermal needs : Dry saturated Steam 1061 kg/hr
Steam temperature inlet : 180 0C
Compressed Air requirement : 4 Nm3/hr Cooling Water recirculation rate : 65 m3/hr
Electrical power consumption : 19 kW/hr
Supply voltage : 400 V
Verticle Thin Film Drier:
Feed Rate : 379 kg/h Initial TS : 40% Final Moisture : 6 – 8% Water Evaporation : 216 kg/h Dried (BAGGABLE) Solids Output : 163 kg/h Drying rate : 216 kg/hr Water Evaporation
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 149 -
Power consumption : 16 kw/hr
Compressed Air requirement : 4 Nm3/hr Cooling Water recirculation rate : 16 m3/hr
Reverse Osmosis Plant:
Feed rate : 80 m3/day Initial TDS : 10000 mg/lt Initial TSS : 200 mg/lt Initial COD : 600 mg/lt Final TDS : 500-750 mg/lt Final COD : 250 mg/lt
2.9.3 AIR POLLUTION SOURCES
2.9.3.1 POWER
The total power requirement of the industry is 1800 kVA. Further one diesel generator of 625 KVA -3 No.s & 750 KVA – 1 No. capacity is proposed to be installed to serve as an alternative source of power supply to this unit.
2.9.3.2 AIR POLLUTION SOURCES
The major air pollution sources from the industry are DG set, boiler and process sections. These sources are provided with stacks of adequate height so as to disperse the emanating flue gases containing SPM, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen without affecting the ground level concentrations and packed column scrubbers are proposed to the process sections with adequate stack height as per the regulatory requirements.
The sources of air pollution, type of fuel used, fuel consumption and chimney heights for each of the air pollution sources of the proposed project are indicated in the following table 2.17.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 150 -
Table: 2.17 Air pollution sources, fuel consumption and chimney height details
SI. no.
Stack attached to Fuel used
Fuel consumption
Number of
stacks
Stack height
Air pollution control unit
Predicted emissions
Existing
1 Process section(scrubbers) (Production block & Finishing block 5 nos each)
- - 15 3 m ARL for each
Packed column scrubbers – 15 no.s
Acid mist/ VOCs
2 Steam boilers – 6 TPH 1 no. + 10 TPH – 1 no.
Coal/ Furnace oil / Husk
1303.06 kgs/Hr
1 32 m AGL (common stack for the 2 boilers)
Mechanical dust collectors/ multicyclone - 2 no.s
SO2, NOx, SPM
3 D.G. sets - 625 kVA – 3 no.s
HSD 125 L/hr 3 6 m ARL for each DG set
Stack SO2, NOx, SPM
Proposed
1 D.G. set new install -750 KVA-1 no.s
HSD 150 L/hr 1 6 m ARL For each DG set
stack SO2, NOx, SPM
2 Process section (Newly insttalled thermic flueid)
6 lakh kilo kalaries-1 no’s
FO/LDO 71 kgs/Hr 1 14 m AGL (combined stack)
Stack SO2, NOx, SPM
* Stack height calculation for Boilers Formula adopted for stack height calculation
H = 14(Q)0.3
Where, H is stack height Above Ground Level Q is sulfur emissions in kg/hr
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 151 -
6&10 TPH BOILER / 400kg/ hr Type of fuel used – Husk Sulfur content in Husk = 0.06% Moisture content=8.21% Nitrogen content=0.35% Ash content=17.62% Carbon content=36.07% However a stack of height 32 m AGL is installed Note : combined stack for 6 TPH, 10 TPH boiler & 6 LK/cl thermic fluid heater is installed The exhaust temperature will be nearly ambient and adequate port holes with access platform will be provided as per KSPCB guidelines as under 1. Location of port holes and approach platform The sampling porthole will be provided at a distance equal to at least eight times the stack diameters downstream and two diameters upstream from source of low disturbance such as bend, expansion, and construction valve fitting or visible flame for rectangular stacks. The equivalent diameter is calculated from the following equation Equivalent diameter = 2 (Length x Width) (Length x Width) 2. The diameter of the sampling port will be minimum 3”. Arrangement will be made to close the port hole firmly during the period when it is not used for sampling. 3. An easily accessible platform will be provided to accommodate 3 to 4 persons to conveniently sample stack emissions from the portholes. Ambient air quality and stack emission monitoring Ambient air quality monitoring will be conducted once in a month as per the guidelines of KSPCB for SPM, RSPM, SOx, NOx, HC and CO and the record of monitoring reports will be maintained and made available to authorities. Similarly stack monitoring will also be conducted for SOx.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 152 -
SCRUBBER DETAILS
Scrubber systems are a diverse group of air pollution control devices that can be used to remove particulates and/or gases from industrial exhaust streams. Traditionally, the term "scrubber" has reference to pollution control devices that used liquid to "scrub" unwanted pollutants from a gas stream. Recently, the term is also used to describe systems that inject a dry reagent or slurry into a dirty exhaust stream to "scrub out" acid gases. Scrubbers are one of the primary devices that control gaseous emissions, especially acid gases. Wet scrubber is a form of pollution control technology in which the polluted gas stream is brought into contact with the scrubbing liquid by spraying it with the liquid, by forcing it through a pool of liquid, or by some other contact method, so as to remove the pollutants. The design of wet scrubbers or any air pollution control device depends on the industrial process conditions and the nature of the air pollutants involved. Inlet gas characteristics and dust properties (if particles are present) are of primary importance. Scrubbers can be designed to collect particulate matter and/or gaseous pollutants. Wet scrubbers remove dust particles by capturing them in liquid droplets; remove pollutant gases by dissolving or absorbing them into the liquid. Any droplets that are in the scrubber inlet gas must be separated from the outlet gas stream by means of another device referred to as a mist eliminator or entrainment separator (these terms are interchangeable). Also, the resultant scrubbing liquid must be treated prior to any ultimate discharge or before being reused in the plant. There are numerous configurations of scrubbers and scrubbing systems, all designed to provide good contact between the liquid and polluted gas stream. The process and solvent recovery sections are provided with scrubber to scrub the fumes and vapors generated in order to remove such emissions before it is let out into the atmosphere. Scrubber Details:
1) scrubbing system for C block intermediate reactors
Type : Single Stage
Counter Flow Packed Bed
Dia : 1250 mm
Height : 4000 mm
M O C : PP/FRP
PP : 5 mm
FRP : 7 mm with Isopthalic Resin
Packing : Polypropylene Pal Rings
Size : 40 mm dia x 40 mm height
Filter Plate : PP Perforated - 15 mm thick
Spray : Polypropylene Jet Spray System
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 153 -
b) Blower:
Type : Backward Curve SISW
Casing : PP/FRP with Isopthalic Resin
Impeller : MS/FRP with Bisphenol Resin
Capacity : 18000 CMH
Stat. Pressure : 150 mmwg
Motor : 20 HP FLP – 1440 RPM
Make : Kirloskar or CG
Drive : Belt
c) Ducting Details:
M O C : PP/FRP
Sizes : 250, 350, 450 & 700 mm dia
Ducting includes Straight lengths, Elbows, T-sections & Reducers
d) Liquid Circulation Tank:
Capacity : 3 K L
PP : 5 mm
FRP : 7 mm with Isopthalic Resin
Cylindrical, vertical, flat bottom & conical top
External MS/FRP Reinforcement
Necessary Nozzles & Manhole
e) Pump:
Make : Antico
Model : 130 CT
Drive Motor : 3 HP – 2900 RPM FLP
f) Liquid Circulation Lines:
MOC : HDPE
Sizes : Variable from 40 mm dia to 75 mm dia
g) MS Support Structure for Scrubber with Anti Corrosive Coating:
Vertical Design 6 L Kcal Capacity Oil fired Thermic Fluid Heater:
Equipments Connected to the System: AO/RE-01, AO/RE-02, AO/RE-03, AO/RE-04, AO/RE-05, AO/RE-06.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 154 -
a) Technical specifications:
MODEL VRT-HT-06
HEAT OUTPUT [KCAL/H] 600000
THERMIC FLUID FLOW THROUGH THE UNIT [L/H] 79000
TEMPERATURE AT HEATER OUTLET 345 º C
THERMAL EFFICIENCY [%] 88
FUEL OIL CONSUMPTION AT MAX. OUTPUT [KG/H] FO/LDO
- FURNACE OIL 9650 KCAL/KG NCV 70.65
- LDO OF 10200 KCAL/KG NCV 66.85
ELECTRICAL CONNECTED LOADS [KW]
THERMIC FLUID PUMP MOTOR 22 KW
BLOWER MOTOR 3.7 KW
FUEL OIL PUMP 0.37 KW
ELECTRICAL OIL PRE HEATER (3.0+3.0+3) KW
ELECTRIC SUPPLY AC;3PHASE;415±5%V;50±3% HZ;4WIRE SYSTEM
APPROX. OVERALL SIZE [MM]
LENGTH 2650
WIDTH 1650
HEIGHT 2520
APPROX. DRY WEIGHT [KG] 3100
b) Technical Comparison for Thermic Fluid Heater
Sr. No Item Description
1 Make Maxima
2 Model VRT-HT-06
3 Type Fully automatic, coil type, pressurized,
Thermic fluid tube. Vertical Unit
4 Heat output 600000 kcal/Hr
5 Thermic fluid inlet temperature 0C 325 Deg C
6 Thermic fluid outlet temperature 0C 340 Deg C
7 Furnace oil consumption (kg/hr) 71 Kgs/Hr
8 Thermal Efficiency 88%
9 Overall dimensions including space for cleaning and maintenance (L X B X H),
mm
L-2100 x W-2100 x H-2950 add another 3.0 mtr for coil removal
10 Empty weight of the unit 3100 Kgs
11 Operating weight of the unit 3397 Kgs
12 Dimensions of coil (Dia X Length X no
of turns)
a Quantity of Thermic fluid required Coil Hold-up 297 Litrs
b Pressure Drop across Hot Oil Unit 20 MLC
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 155 -
13 Expansion tank 3 KL
a Dimensions (L x B x H ), mm 1900 x 1300 x 1300 mm
b MOC IS 2062
c Empty weight (kg) 1296 Kgs
d Operating weight (kg) 4406 Kgs
14 Thermic fluid storage tank or Dump
Tank 5 KL
a Dimensions (L x B x H ), mm 2500 x 1600 x 1850 mm
b MOC IS 2062
c Empty weight (kg) 1719 Kgs
d Operating weight (kg) 6746 Kgs
15 Furnace oil day tank 0.99 KL
a Dimensions (L x B x H ), mm 1000 x 1000 x 990 mm
b MOC IS 2062
c Empty weight (kg) 380 Kgs
d Operating weight (kg) 1370 Kgs
16 Thermic fluid circulation pumps
a Capacity 79 M3/Hr
b Head 60 MLC
c Speed 2900 rpm
d BKW / Recommended motor BKW - 18 / KW- 22KW
e MOC of casing CI
f MOC of impeller CI
g Shaft seal details Mechnaical Seal
h Flushing plan details Drain Point
17 Thermic fluid filling pump
a Capacity 1000 LPH
b Head 50 MLC
c Speed 1440 rpm
d BKW / Recommended motor BKW - 0.5 / KW- 0.75 KW
e MOC of casing CI/CS
f MOC of impeller EN (Gear + Shaft)
g Shaft seal details Mechnaical Seal
h Flushing plan details Drain Point
18 Blower
a Capacity 1800 M3/Hr
b Head 400 mm Wc
c BKW / Rec. motor (KW) BKW - 3 / KW- 3.7 KW
19 Thermic fluid Drain pump Not
Required
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 156 -
a Capacity 1000 LPH
b Head 50 MLC
c Speed 1440 rpm
d BKW / Recommended motor BKW - 0.5 / KW- 0.75 KW
e MOC of casing CI/CS
f MOC of impeller EN (Gear + Shaft)
g Shaft seal details Mechnaical Seal
h Flushing plan details Drain Point
20 Stack Details Customer Scope
a Diameter 350 mm
b Height 30.5 Mtr
c M.O.C. IS 2062
d Type Self Supported, as per IS 6533
e Connected Electric load 22.22 KW
21 OIL PUMP Make Prakash /Eqvt
a Type Gear
b Capacity 300 LPH
c Head 300 mWC
d BKW / Recommended motor BKW - 0.6 / KW- 0.75 KW
22 BURNER Make Maxima
a Type Pr. Jet Spill return
b Capacity 0.8 MW
c Modulation Two stage
Fig 2.7: Column scrubber
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 157 -
Mechanical dust collector:
Capacity of boiler : 10 Ton Output gas flow : 24000 CMH Type of fuel : Coal/husk Temp of flue gases : 180°C-220°C Air quantity to be handled : 24000 CMH Pressure drop across the system : 70-75 MMWG Total no of cyclones : 16 No.’s Size of output pipe : Ф 150 mm Thickness of cones : 10 mm Material of construction of cones : IS 210 Thickness of outer casing & hopper : 3.15 mm
2.9.3.3 NOISE GENERATION AND ITS MANAGEMENT
The major source of noise pollution in the industry is the DG set for which acoustic enclosure is proposed. Also ambient noise levels will be ensured within the ambient standards by inbuilt design of mechanical equipment and building apart from vegetation (tree plantations) along the periphery and at various locations within the industry premises.
2.9.3.4 SOLID WASTE GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT
The quantity of solid waste generated from the industry is calculated as below in the table 2.18
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 158 -
TABLE 2.18 SOLID WASTE GENERATION
Total no. of employees 600
Assuming per capita solid waste generation rate as 0.2 kg/capita/day
Quantity of solid waste generated 120 kg/day
Organic solid waste : 60 % of the total waste 72 kg/day
Inorganic solid waste : 40 % of the total waste 48 kg/day
Disposal of domestic solid waste The domestic wastes are segregated at source, collected in bins and composted.
2.9.3.5 Hazardous raw materials used in the manufacturing process and hazardous waste
generation and management
2.9.3.5.1 HAZARDOUS RAW MATERIALS
The following raw materials used during the process of manufacture of APIs and
Intermediates are hazardous in nature according to Manufacture, Storage and Import of
Hazardous Chemical (Amendment) Rules, 1989 (as amended on 24-9-2008), Schedule-1.
TABLE 2.19: Hazardous raw materials
Hazardous raw material Sl. No. as per Hazardous Wastes (Management & Handling) Rules, 1989 (as amended on 24-9-2008), Schedule-1.
Acetic acid 2
Acetic anhydride 3
Acetone 4
Acetonitrile 7
Aluminum chloride 22
Ammonia 31
Benzene sulfonyl chloride 57
Bromine 84
Chlorobenzene 128
Chloroform 130
Chlorosulphonic acid 136
Cyclohexane 161
Dimethyl amine 215
Dioxane 224
Ethyl acetate 247
Ethyl alcohol 248
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 159 -
Formaldehyde 285
Hexane 306
Hydrogen 314
Isopropyl alcohol 334
Methyl alcohol 377
Methylene chloride 400
Nickel powder 420
Phosphoric acid 497
Phosphorous trichloride 506
Phthalic anhydride 508
Piperidine catalyst 514
Potassium hydroxide 522
Pyridine 547
Sodium hydroxide 571
Sulfuric acid 591
Thionyl chloride 620
Toluene 628
Triethyl amine 652
2.9.3.5.2 HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT
The hazardous wastes generated during the process of manufacture of different APIs & Intermediates are stored at hazardous waste storage area and sent to TSDF. The quantities of hazardous waste generated from various processes are shown in the following tables.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 160 -
1. PROCESS RESIDUE
Table : -2.20 Quantity of organic process residue generation from manufacturing process.
Stages Residue generation
Name of the Product Stage Residue generated
Qty per Batch
No. of Batches/
month
Residue generated
Qty /month
Residue generated Qty /year
Ambroxol Hcl I 0 1.7 0 0
II 0 1.7 0 0
Anastrozole I 0 8 0 0
II 0 8 0 0
III 0 8 0 0
Gemcitabine Hcl I 0 3 0 0
II 0 3 0 0
III 0 3 0 0
Paclitaxel I 0.1 8.3 0.83 9.96
II 0.2 8.3 1.66 19.92
III 0 8.3 0 0
IV 0 8.3 0 0
Temozolomide I 0.16 8 1.28 15.36
II 0 8 0 0
Bicalutamide I 2 5 10 120
Docetaxel trihydrate I 2.15 8 17.2 206.4
II 0.4 8 3.2 38.4
III 0 8 0 0
3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
I 0 20 0 0
II 0 20 0 0
III 0.08 20 1.6 19.2
IV 0 20 0 0
V 0 20 0 0
VI 0 20 0 0
Bendamustine Hcl I 0.1 14 1.4 16.8
Bortezomib I 0.1 41.7 4.17 50.04
II 0.02 41.7 0.834 10.008
III 0 41.7 0 0
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 161 -
Capecitabine I 0.4 50 20 240
II 0.1 50 5 60
III 0.2 50 10 120
Imatinib mesylate I 0 41.7 0 0
Lenalidomide I 0.1 41.7 4.17 50.04
II 2 41.7 83.4 1000.8
Letrozole I 0.2 4.2 0.84 10.08
II 0.7 4.2 2.94 35.28
Pemetrexed disodium I 0 20.8 0 0
II 0 20.8 0 0
III 0.4 20.8 8.32 99.84
Decitabine I 0 1.7 0 0
II 0 1.7 0 0
III 1.2 1.7 2.04 24.48
IV 0 1.7 0 0
V 0 1.7 0 0
Cytrabine I 0 13 0 0
II 0.05 13 0.65 7.8
Cabazitaxel I 0 2.1 0 0
II 0 2.1 0 0
III 0 2.1 0 0
Acebrophylline I 0 3.3 0 0
II 0 3.3 0 0
Clofarabine I 0 2 0 0
II 0 2 0 0
III 2.9 2 5.8 69.6
IV 0 2 0 0
Melphalan Hcl I 0 3.8 0 0
II 0 3.8 0 0
III 0 3.8 0 0
IV 0 3.8 0 0
V 0 3.8 0 0
Cyclophosphamide I 0 63.1 0 0
II 0 63.1 0 0
III 0 63.1 0 0
Tenofovir I 0.15 16.7 2.505 30.06
II 0 16.7 0 0
Pemetrexed dipotassium I 0 10.4 0 0
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 162 -
II 0 10.4 0 0
III 2 10.4 20.8 249.6
Erlotinib I 0 6.7 0 0
II 6 6.7 40.2 482.4
III 0 6.7 0 0
IV 5 6.7 33.5 402
Emtricitabine I 0 0.3 0 0
II 0 0.3 0 0
Dimethyl Fumarate I 3 4 12 144
II 0.5 4 2 24
Elvitegravir I 0.25 0.3 0.075 0.9
II 0.05 0.3 0.015 0.18
III 0 0.3 0 0
IV 0 0.3 0 0
V 0 0.3 0 0
VI 0 0.3 0 0
Cobicistat I 0 33 0 0
II 0 33 0 0
III 1.31 33 43.23 518.76
IV 3.8 33 125.4 1504.8
V 0 33 0 0
VI 0 33 0 0
VII 0 33 0 0
Busulfan I 0 4.2 0 0
II 1.376 4.2 5.7792 69.3504
Zoledronic Acid I 1.5 0.4 0.6 7.2
II 3.04 0.4 1.216 14.592
III 2.2 0.4 0.88 10.56
IV 0 0.4 0 0
Tranexamic acid I 0 18.5 0 0
II 0 18.5 0 0
III 0 18.5 0 0
IV 0 18.5 0 0
V 0 18.5 0 0
VI 0 18.5 0 0
VII 0 18.5 0 0
Sunitinib Malate I 3 12.5 37.5 450
II 0 12.5 0 0
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 163 -
III 0 12.5 0 0
Sorafenib Tosylate I 6 25 150 1800
II 2.5 25 62.5 750
III 0 25 0 0
Abiraterone acetate IV 0 2.5 0 0
Total qty/year Total qty/month 723.5342 8682.4104
Total qty/month Total qty/year 8682.4104
SPENT CARBON
Table : -2.21 Details of Spent carbon
Spent Carbon generation in kg
Sl.No
Name of the Product
Manufacturing qty/year
(MT)
Stage Spent Carbon
generated Qty per Batch
No. of Batches/
month
Spent Carbon generated
Qty /month
Spent Carbon
generated Qty /year
1 Ambroxol Hcl 10 I 0 1.7 0 0
II 4 1.7 6.8 81.6
2 Anastrozole 0.1 I 0 8 0 0
II 0 8 0 0
III 0 8 0 0
3 Gemcitabine Hcl
0.1 I 0 3 0 0
II 0.18 3 0.54 6.48
III 0 3 0 0
4 Paclitaxel 0.1 I 0 8.3 0 0
II 0 8.3 0 0
III 0 8.3 0 0
IV 0 8.3 0 0
5 Temozolomide 0.1 I 0 8 0 0
II 0.2 8 1.6 19.2
6 Bicalutamide 0.5 I 0 5 0 0
7 Docetaxel trihydrate
0.1 I 0 8 0 0
II 0 8 0 0
III 0 8 0 0
8 3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
60 I 0 20 0 0
II 0 20 0 0
III 0 20 0 0
IV 0 20 0 0
V 0 20 0 0
VI 0 20 0 0
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 164 -
9 Bendamustine Hcl
0.2 I 0 14 0 0
10 Bortezomib 0.005 I 0 41.7 0 0
II 0 41.7 0 0
III 0 41.7 0 0
11 Capecitabine 60 I 0 50 0 0
II 0 50 0 0
III 0 50 0 0
12 Imatinib mesylate
5 I 1 41.7 41.7 500.4
13 Lenalidomide 0.5 I 0 41.7 0 0
II 0.1 41.7 4.17 50.04
14 Letrozole 0.05 I 0 4.2 0 0
II 0 4.2 0 0
15 Pemetrexed disodium
0.25 I 0 20.8 0 0
II 0 20.8 0 0
III 0 20.8 0 0
16 Decitabine 0.01 I 0 1.7 0 0
II 0 1.7 0 0
III 0 1.7 0 0
IV 0 1.7 0 0
V 0.5 1.7 0.85 10.2
17 Cytrabine 0.5 I 0 13 0 0
II 0 13 0 0
18 Cabazitaxel 0.001 I 0 2.1 0 0
II 0 2.1 0 0
III 0 2.1 0 0
19 Acebrophylline 10 I 0 3.3 0 0
II 0 3.3 0 0
20 Clofarabine 0.001 I 0 2 0 0
II 0 2 0 0
III 0 2 0 0
IV 0 2 0 0
21 Melphalan Hcl 0.025 I 1 3.8 3.8 45.6
II 0 3.8 0 0
III 0 3.8 0 0
IV 0 3.8 0 0
V 0 3.8 0 0
22 Cyclophosphamide
1.00 I 0 63.1 0 0
II 0 63.1 0 0
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 165 -
III 0 63.1 0 0
23 Tenofovir 50 I 0 16.7 0 0
II 0 16.7 0 0
24 Pemetrexed dipotassium
0.25 I 0.7 10.4 7.28 87.36
II 0 10.4 0 0
III 0 10.4 0 0
25 Erlotinib 2 I 0.705 6.7 4.7235 56.682
II 0 6.7 0 0
III 0 6.7 0 0
IV 0.405 6.7 2.7135 32.562
26 Emtricitabine 1 I 0 0.3 0 0
II 3 0.3 0.9 10.8
27 Dimethyl Fumarate
12 I 0 4 0 0
II 0 4 0 0
28 Elvitegravir 1 I 0 0.3 0 0
II 0 0.3 0 0
III 0 0.3 0 0
IV 1.2 0.3 0.36 4.32
V 2 0.3 0.6 7.2
VI 0 0.3 0 0
29 Cobicistat 100 I 0 33 0 0
II 0 33 0 0
III 0 33 0 0
IV 0 33 0 0
V 0 33 0 0
VI 0 33 0 0
VII 3.77 33 124.41 1492.92
30 Busulfan 0.05 I 0 4.2 0 0
II 1 4.2 4.2 50.4
31 Zoledronic Acid 0.005 I 0 0.4 0 0
II 0 0.4 0 0
III 0 0.4 0 0
IV 0.16 0.4 0.064 0.768
32 Tranexamic acid 100 I 0 18.5 0 0
II 0 18.5 0 0
III 0 18.5 0 0
IV 0.1 18.5 1.65 22.2
V 0 18.5 0 0
VI 0 18.5 0 0
I 0 18.5 0 0
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 166 -
33 Sunitinib Malate
3 I 0 12.5 0 0
II 0 12.5 0 0
III 0 12.5 0 0
34 Sorafenib Tosylate
3 I 0 25 0 0
II 0 25 0 0
III 0 25 0 0
35 Abiraterone acetate
2 I 0 2.5 0 0
II 0 2.5 0 0
III 0 2.5 0 0
IV 2 2.5 5 60
Total qty in kg/month 211.561 2538.37 or say 2539
Note: Spent carbon will be sent to authorize re-processors for recovery & re-use. INORGANIC SALT GENERATION FROM THE PROCESS
Table : -2.22 Inorganic Salt Generation From The Process
Stages Inorganic salt generation
Name of the Product Stage
Inorganic Salt
generated Qty per batch
No. of Batches/
month
Inorganic Salt
generated Qty per month
Inorganic Salt
generated Qty per
year
Ambroxol Hcl I 0 1.7 0 0
II 0 1.7 0 0
Anastrozole
I 0 8 0 0
II 0 8 0 0
III 1.25 8 10 120
Gemcitabine Hcl
I 0 3 0 0
II 0 3 0 0
III 0 3 0 0
Paclitaxel
I 3.75 8.3 31.125 373.5
II 0 8.3 0 0
III 0 8.3 0 0
IV 0 8.3 0 0
Temozolomide I 0 8 0 0
II 0 8 0 0
Bicalutamide I 5 5 25 300
Docetaxel trihydrate I 21.6 8 172.8 2073.6
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 167 -
II 0 8 0 0
III 0 8 0 0
3a,7B-Dihydroxy Cholanic Acid
I 0 20 0 0
II 0 20 0 0
III 0 20 0 0
IV 0 20 0 0
V 0 20 0 0
VI 0 20 0 0
Bendamustine Hcl I 0 14 0 0
Bortezomib
I 0.8 41.7 33.36 400.32
II 0.8 41.7 33.36 400.32
III 0 41.7 0 0
Capecitabine
I 1.5 50 75 900
II 0 50 0 0
III 7.5 50 375 4500
Imatinib mesylate I 0 41.7 0 0
Lenalidomide I 0 41.7 0 0
II 0 41.7 0 0
Letrozole I 0 4.2 0 0
II 0 4.2 0 0
Pemetrexed disodium
I 0 20.8 0 0
II 0 20.8 0 0
III 0 20.8 0 0
Decitabine
I 4.38 1.7 7.446 89.352
II 8 1.7 13.6 163.2
III 79.88 1.7 135.796 1629.552
IV 0 1.7 0 0
V 0 1.7 0 0
Cytrabine I 0 13 0 0
II 0 13 0 0
Cabazitaxel
I 0 2.1 0 0
II 0 2.1 0 0
III 0 2.1 0 0
Acebrophylline I 85 3.3 280.5 3366
II 0 3.3 0 0
Clofarabine
I 110.21 2 220.42 2645.04
II 0 2 0 0
III 0 2 0 0
IV 2.45 2 4.9 58.8
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 168 -
Melphalan Hcl
I 1.29 3.8 4.902 58.824
II 0 3.8 0 0
III 2.5 3.8 9.5 114
IV 57.46 3.8 218.348 2620.176
V 0 3.8 0 0
Cyclophosphamide
I 0 63.1 0 0
II 23.25 63.1 1467.075 17604.9
III 0.22 63.1 13.882 166.584
Tenofovir I 0 16.7 0 0
II 0 16.7 0 0
Pemetrexed dipotassium
I 0.7 10.4 7.28 87.36
II 0 10.4 0 0
III 0 10.4 0 0
Erlotinib
I 241 6.7 1614.7 19376.4
II 11.5 6.7 77.05 924.6
III 445.5 6.7 2984.85 35818.2
IV 2.7 6.7 18.09 217.08
Emtricitabine I 0 0.3 0 0
II 35 0.3 10.5 126
Dimethyl Fumarate I 55.55 4 222.2 2666.4
II 0.1 4 0.4 4.8
Elvitegravir
I 16 0.3 4.8 57.6
II 0 0.3 0 0
III 4.17 0.3 1.251 15.012
IV 0 0.3 0 0
V 0 0.3 0 0
VI 0 0.3 0 0
Cobicistat
I 0 33 0 0
II 0 33 0 0
III 0 33 0 0
IV 0 33 0 0
V 0 33 0 0
VI 0 33 0 0
VII 0 33 0 0
Busulfan I 0 4.2 0 0
II 0 4.2 0 0
Zoledronic Acid
I 0 0.4 0 0
II 0 0.4 0 0
III 0 0.4 0 0
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 169 -
IV 0.4 0.4 0.16 1.92
Tranexamic acid
I 0 18.5 0 0
II 0 18.5 0 0
III 0 18.5 0 0
IV 0 18.5 0 0
V 0 18.5 0 0
VI 0 18.5 0 0
VII 0 18.5 0 0
Sunitinib Malate
I 0 12.5 0 0
II 0 12.5 0 0
III 0 12.5 0 0
Sorafenib Tosylate
I 0 25 0 0
II 0 25 0 0
III 0 25 0 0
Abiraterone acetate IV 0 2.5 0 0
Total qty/year Total qty/month 8073.295 96879.54
Total qty/month Total qty/year 96879.54
SPENT CATALYS
Table : -2.23 Quantity of spent catalyst generation from manufacturing process Sl. No. APIs &
intermediates Stage Type of
catalyst Quantity of spent catalyst generated
kg/batch kg/month kg/annum
1 Bicalutamide
1st Potassium permanganate
5 5 60
2 Ursodeoxycholic Acid 1st
3 Ambroxol HCl - - - - -
4 Anasrozole - - - - -
5 Temozolabide -
6 Docetaxel Trihydrate - - - - -
7 Paclitaxel - Zinc dust 3.75 30 360
8 Acebrophylline - - - - -
9 Imatinib - - - - -
10 Capacitabine - Pyridine 6 120 1440
11 Bendamustine
12 PMD - - - - -
13 Bortzomib 2nd
14 Busulfan 1st
15 Letrozole 2nd
16 Lenalidomide - Raney nickel 0.6 0.6 7.2
17 Tenfovir -
18 Erlotonib -
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 170 -
19 PMK -
20 Decitabine - Pyridine 19.3 19.3 231.6
21 Zoledranic Acid - - - - -
22 Melphalan - - - - -
23 Cytrabine - - - - -
24 Cyclophosphamide - - - -
25 Cabazitaxel - - - - -
26 Cloferabine - - - - -
27 Emtricitabine - - - - -
28 Dimethyl fumarate - - - - -
29 Elvitegravir - - - - -
30 Cobicistat - - - - -
31 Gemcitabine HCl
- - - - -
32 Tranexamic acid 2nd Raney-Ni 49 808.5 9702
33 Sunitinib Malate - - - - -
34 Sorafenib Tosylate - - - - -
35 Abiraterone acetate - - - - -
Total qty in kg 83.65 875.4 11,800.8
Note: Spent catalysts will be sent to authorized re-processors for recovery & re-use.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 171 -
OTHER HAZARDOUS WASTES Table : -2.24 Summary of the total quantity of hazardous wastes:
Sl. No.
Source
Quantity of hazardous waste generated
Category according to Schedule I of hazardous waste categories
Treatment/ Disposal kg/month kg/annum
1 Process residue 723.5 8682.4 28.1 Send to Co processing industries in cement industries.
2 Inorganic salt from Process
8073.295 kg 96879.54 kg 34.3 Send to TSDF (Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility), Bangalore
3 Spent Carbon 211.36 2536.3 28.2 Send to Co processing industries in cement industries
4 Spent catalyst
875.4 11,800.8 28.2
Sent to manufacturer/ reprocessor for recycle and reuse.
5 Waste oil from DG set & boiler
150 L/Month 1800 L/annum
5.1 Handed over to KSPCB authorized recyclers/re-processors
6 Spent Solvent 51940 L/month 623288 L/annum
20.2
Solvent distillation inhouse/Send to authorized spent solvent re-processors for recover & re-use.
7 Distillation residue
1.5 MT/month 20.3 MT/annum
20.3 Send to Co processing industries in cement industries
8
Salt from Multiple effect Evaporation System
32739 kg/monh (26739 kg from unit-2 + 6000 from unit-1)
393 Tons/annum
34.3
Send to TSDF (Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility), Bangalore/ Co processing industries.
9 ETP Sludge 3000 kg 36000 kg 34.4
Send to TSDF (Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility), Bangalore/ Co processing industries.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 172 -
10 Discarded Containers/ liners /barrels
500 No’s/month 6000 no’s/annum
33.3 Handed over to KSPCB authorized recyclers/re-processors
11 Used Batteries -- 05 Hand over to authorized re – cyclers
12 E-Waste 5 kg 60 kg Handed over to KSPCB authorized recyclers/re-processors
Table 2.25: Characteristics of hazardous waste
Sl. No
Parameter Unit Method CPCB Std. and WLT/TCLP Limit for Direct Landfill
1 Physical state - Visual observation -
2 Color - Visual observation -
3 Texture - Visual observation -
4 Bulk density gm/cc ASTM Std: D 5057 -1990 (Reapproved 2001)
-
5 Paint Filter Liquid Test
- SW-846:9095 A Pass
6 pH (at 29.60 C) - SW-846:9040B, 9045 C 4.0 - 12.0
7 Calorific Value kcal/kg IS:1350 (Part II)-1970 (Reaffirmed 1983)
<2500.0
8 Flash Point 0C SW-846:1020A >60.0
9 Loss on drying at 103-1050 C
% (w/w) Std.Methods:2540 B -
10 Loss on ignition at 5500 C (dry basis)
% (w/w) Std. Methods:2540 E < 20.0 (non-biodegradable) <5.0 (biodegradable)
11 Reactive cyanide mg/kg SW-846: Ch.7 (7.3.3), 9014 -
12 Reactive sulfide mg/kg SW-846: Ch.7 (7.3.4), 9034 -
13 Water soluble compounds except salts – in WLT extract
% (w/w) DIN:38414 Part 4 (S4) Std. Methods:2540 B,E
<10.0
14 Oil and grease (As n-hexane extractable)
% (w/w) SW-846:3540C, 9071A <4.0
15 Cyanide-total mg/kg SW-846:9010B, 9014 -
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 173 -
15 a
Cyanide-WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part 4 (S4) Std. Methods:4500-CN-C SW-846:9014
<2.0
16 Fluoride-Total mg/kg Std.Methods:4500-F-B,D -
16 a
Fluoride-WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part 4 (S4) Std.Methods:4500F-B,D
<50.0
17 Nitrate-WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part4 (S4) Std.Methods:4500-NO3
- E <30.0
18 Ammonia -WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part4 (S4) Std.Methods:4500-NH3 B,C
<1000.0
19 Arsenic-Total mg/kg SW-846:3050B Std.Methods:3500-As B
-
19 a
Arsenic- WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part 4(S4) SW-846:3010A Std.Methods:3500-As B
<1.0
20 Cadmium –Total mg/kg SW-846:3050B,7130 -
20 a
Cadmium - WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part4(S4) SW-846:3010A,7130
<0.20
21 Chromium – Total mg/kg SW-846 :3050 B, 7190 -
21 a
Chromium (VI)-WLT
mg/L DIN:38414 Part4(S4) Std.Methods:3500-Cr B
<0.50
21 b
Chromium-TCLP mg/L SW-846:1311 SW-846:3010A, 7190
<5.0
22 Copper-Total mg/kg SW-846:3050B, 7210 -
22 a
Copper-WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part4(S4) SW-846:3010A, 7210
<10.0
23 Lead-Total mg/kg SW-846:3050B, 7420 -
23 a
Lead-WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part4(S4) SW-846:3010A, 7420
<2.0
25 Nickel-Total mg/kg SW-846:3050B, 7520 -
25 a
Nickel-WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part4(S4) SW-846:3010A, 7520
<3.0
27 Zinc-Total mg/kg SW-846:3050B, 7950 -
27 a
Zinc-WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part4(S4) SW-846:3010A, 7950
<10.0
28 Phenol-Total mg/kg SW-846:9065 -
28 a
Phenol-WLT mg/L DIN:38414 Part4(S4) SW-846:9065
<100.0
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 174 -
2.9.3.5.3 STORAGE FACILITIES FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE
The industry proposes to provide adequate storage facilities for the hazardous wastes. The details are appended below.
Table :- 2.26 Storage Facilities For Hazardous Waste
Storage facilities at the project site
A designated impervious structure (sealed drums under cover roof) is proposed at the project site for collection and storage of hazardous waste.
Hazardous waste disposal Hazardous waste generated from the proposed Industry will be handed over to M/s. Karnataka Waste Management Project (a division of RAMKY Enviro Engineers Ltd) and Mother Earth Environ tech private limited. situated at Sy. No. 7-85, KIADB Industrial area, Thimmanayakahalli, Dabaspet, Nelamangala Taluk, Bangalore.
Distance from the project site About 450 km
Mode of transport Provided by M/s. Karnataka Waste Management Project,
M./sMothwer earth Environ Tech private limited Table: -2.27 Disposal Facilities For Hazardous Waste
Sl. No.
Source Treatment/ Disposal
1 Process residue Send to authorized spent re-processors /Co processing industries.
2 Inorganic salt from Process
Send to TSDF (Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility), Bangalore
3 Spent Carbon Send to authorized spent catalyst re-processors for regeneration & re-use.
4 Waste oil from DG set & boiler
Handed over to KSPCB authorized recyclers/re-processors
5 Spent Solvent Send to authorized spent re-processors for recover & re-use.
6 Salt from Multiple effect Evaporation System
Send to TSDF (Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility), Bangalore/ Co processing industries.
7 ETP Sludge Send to TSDF (Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility), Bangalore/ Co processing industries.
8 Discarded Containers Handed over to KSPCB authorized recyclers/re-processors
9 Used Batteries Hand over to authorized re – cyclers
10 E-Waste Handed over to KSPCB authorized recyclers/re-processors
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 175 -
Hazop analysis of the products is enclosed as annexure- 1
2.9.4 RAINWATER HARVESTING & GROUNDWATER RECHARGING The total amount/quantity of water i.e., received in the form of rainfall over an area is called
the rain water endowment of that area, out of which the amount of water that can be
effectively harvested is called the rain water harvesting potential.
Rain water harvesting potential = Intensity of rainfall (m) x Roof area x
Impermeability factor
The collection efficiency accounts for the fact that all the rain water falling over an area cannot be effectively harvested due to losses on account of evaporation, spillage or runoff etc. According to the meteorological data for Raichur, the average rainfall = 2.67 mm/hr Assuming that about 90% rainfall can be effectively harvested No. of hours it rains/day = 2 hrs Therefore intensity of rainfall = 4.8 mm/day or 0.005 m/day
Quantity of roof top rain water harvested from the project: The Ground Coverage area of the proposed project is about 19459 sq m. For rain water harvesting consider 75% of this total area = 14594.25 sq m. Quantity of Rain Water that can be harvested from the proposed project is calculated as below. Water Harvested per Year = Mean Annual Rainfall x Area x Collection Efficiency = 0.005 x 14594.25 x 0.9 = 65.67 or say 66 m3/day However, it proposed to initially utilize the entire quantity of the rainfall potential by providing adequate storage facilities of 200 KL capcity of open pond. The amount of storm water that the landscaped/open area will produce can be determined by considering the impermeability factor to be 0.3. Q = 0.005 x 56066.06x 0.3 = 84.09 m3/day or say 85 m3/day
The amount of storm water that the paved area will produce can be determined by
considering the impermeability factor to be 0.3.
Q = 0.005 x 9458.94x 0.9
= 42.56 m3/day or say 43 m3/day
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 176 -
The total amount of storm water = landscaped area + paved area
= 43 + 85 m3/day
= 128 m3/day
The project Proponents will also provide recharging pits along the inner periphery of the
boundary wall. Each recharging pit will be of size 1.2 m dia x 2.5 m deep spaced at 20 m center
to center. These recharging pits are filled with graded media comprising of boulder at bottom
and with coarse aggregates to facilitate percolation of harvested rainwater to recharge
ground water table. The recharge pits are interconnected in such a way that the rain led to
the first recharge pit is also led to the next pit.
2.10 ASSESSMENT OF NEW & UNTESTED TECHNOLOGY FOR THE RISK OF TECHNOLOGICAL
FAILURE
The proposed project involves expansion and modification of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry. The manufacturing process for these products is a tried & tested method & therefore there is no risk of technological failure. In addition to this the facility is being backed up by the R & D centre there would be continuous efforts for optimization of the process to care of the any technological failures.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 177 -
CHAPTER 3
DESCRIPTION OF THE
ENVIRONMENT
3.1 STUDY AREA, PERIOD, COMPONENTS & METHODOLOGY
STUDY AREA: An area, covering 10 km radial distance around the project site is considered as
the study area for conducting baseline studies.
PERIOD: Baseline study in this Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment report was conducted
for a period of three months during December 2016 to Febraury 2017.
COMPONENTS: Air, noise, water & soil analysis studies were carried out. Survey of the flora &
fauna in the surroundings & demographic pattern of the survey area were also studied.
METHODOLOGY: Baseline environmental studies were conducted to know the status of various
environmental attributes, viz. climatic and atmospheric conditions, air, water, noise, soil, land
use pattern, ecological, socioeconomical environment. The studies involved conducting field
studies and analyzing various parameters that might be affected due to the expansion and
conducting socio-economic survey among the people. Secondary data was collected from
State/Central Government organizations, semi-Government and public sector organizations.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 178 -
Fig 3.0: Topo map of the study area
Source: Survey of India; Scale: 1:50000
Note: Topo map of 10 km radius is appended as Annexure B
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 179 -
3.2 ESTABLISHMENT OF BASELINE 3.2.1 Meteorological data Assessment of the micro and macro meteorology is important from the standpoint of
understanding the nature and extent of air pollution in the study area. Climate has an important
role in the build-up of pollution levels. The climatic condition of the area may be classified as
moderately or seasonally dry, tropical or temperate savanna climate with four seasons in a
year. Winter is critical for air pollution build-up because of frequent calm conditions with
temperature inversions resulting in poor atmospheric mixing, natural ventilation and high
emission loads.
The classification of months according to the seasons is given in the following table.
Season Period Summer March to May
Monsoon June to September
Post monsoon October to November
Winter December to February
The metrological data reflecting minimum, maximum temperature in 0C, relative humidity in
%, rainfall in mm/hr, wind speed in m/s, mixing height in m, cloud cover in tenths and
atmospheric pressure in mb for the year 2016 obtained from modeling studies carried out
using U.S. EPA AERMOD dispersion model, 1996 – 2016 Lakes Environmental Software,
Version 7.1.0 has been appended as table 3.1.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 180 -
TABLE 3.1: METEOROLOGICAL DATA OF BANGALORE FOR THE YEAR 2016
Month Temperature 0C
Relative humidity
%
Precipitation rate
(mm/hr)
Atmospheric Pr. (mb)
Wind speed (m/s)
Predominant wind
direction (blowing
from)
Inversion / mixing height
(m)
Cloud cover
(tenths)
Min Max Min Max Min Day Night Min Max Max Day Night Min Max
Jan 14.9 29.7 41 85 0 0.25 966 978 0 6.2 SE & E 2011 826 2 10
Feb 17.9 32.3 36 78 0 0.51 965 973 0 5.7 SE 2751 1206 2 10
Mar 20.0 33 34 70 0 2.79 963 973 0 6.7 SE & NW 2853 2143 2 6
Apr 22.4 36 24 55 0 0.76 961 970 0 6.7 NW 3626 2479 2 4
May 20.7 36.1 24 50 0 4.06 958 969 0 6.7 NW 3823 2555 2 5
June 22 35.1 29 60 0 3.30 959 968 0 8.2 W & SW 3298 3289 2 5
July 21.1 32.4 50 90 0 4.06 958 968 1 9.3 SW 2366 2506 3 10
Aug 21.1 32.8 36 74 0 5.33 959 969 0 8.2 W 2741 2294 2 10
Sept 21 33.8 33 70 0 5.08 959 969 0 7.2 W 3073 2776 2 10
Oct 21.1 32.1 32 70 0 4.06 957 973 0 6.7 NE 2935 1760 2 10
Nov 16.3 29.3 37 78 0 2.54 960 974 0 8.7 NE 2114 1267 2 10
Dec 16.3 27.5 40 82 0 1.52 966 976 0 5.1 E 1901 787 2 10
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 181 -
3.2.2 TEMPERATURE
The mean maximum temperature is observed at (36.1°C) in the month of May and the mean minimum temperature at (14.9°C) is observed in the month of January.
In the summer season the mean minimum temperature is observed during the month of
March (20°C). During the monsoon the mean maximum temperature is observed to be
35.1°C for June with the mean minimum temperature at 21°C during September. By the
end of September with the onset of post monsoon season (October - November), day
temperatures drop slightly with the mean maximum temperature at 32.1°C in October
and mean minimum temperature is observed at 16.3°C in the month of November. The
values are presented in table 3.1.
3.2.3 RELATIVE HUMIDITY
Minimum and maximum values of relative humidity have been recorded. During summer
season the minimum & maximum humidity value observed are 24% in April & May & 70%
in March. The mean minimum value of humidity during monsoon season is 29% in the
month of June & the maximum is 90% in the month of July. During the post-monsoon &
winter season the maximum value of humidity is 78% & 85% in November & January
respectively. The minimum values during these seasons are 32% in October & 36% in
February respectively.The values are presented in table 3.1.
3.2.4 RAINFALL
The monsoon in this region usually occurs twice in a year i.e. from June to September and
from October to November. The maximum annual rate of precipitation over this region
ranges between 0.25 to 4.06 mm/hr.
3.2.5 ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE
The maximum and the minimum atmospheric pressures are recorded during all seasons.
In the summer season, the mean maximum and minimum pressure values are observed
to be 973 mb in the month of March and 958 mb in the month of May respectively. During
monsoon season, the maximum pressure is 969 mb and minimum 958 mb. The maximum
pressure during the post-monsoon season is observed to be 974 mb in November and
minimum pressure is 957 mb in the month of October. During the winter season the
minimum atmospheric pressure is 965 mb in February and the maximum is 978 mb in the
month of January.The values are presented in table 3.1.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 182 -
3.2.6 WIND The data on wind patterns are pictorially represented by means of wind rose diagrams for the entire year as figure 3.1(for different seasons). Predominant wind directions
Season Period Wind direction Summer March to May South East
Monsoon June to September North East
Post monsoon October to November South West
Winter December to February South West
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 183 -
Fig 3.1: Wind rose diagrams
1) March to May (summer season)
WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software
WIND ROSE PLOT:
Summer season - March to May
COMMENTS:
MODELER:
Aqua Tech Enviro Engineers
DATE:
9/15/2012
PROJECT NO.:
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST EAST
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
WIND SPEED
(m/s)
>= 11.1
8.8 - 11.1
5.7 - 8.8
3.6 - 5.7
2.1 - 3.6
0.5 - 2.1
Calms: 14.09%
TOTAL COUNT:
2208 hrs.
CALM WINDS:
14.09%
DATA PERIOD:
2009 Mar 1 - May 3100:00 - 23:00
AVG. WIND SPEED:
2.46 m/s
DISPLAY:
Wind SpeedDirection (blowing from)
2016
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 184 -
2) June to September (monsoon season)
WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software
WIND ROSE PLOT:
Monsoon season - June to September
COMMENTS:
MODELER:
Aqua Tech Enviro Engineers
DATE:
9/15/2012
PROJECT NO.:
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST EAST
6%
12%
18%
24%
30%
WIND SPEED
(m/s)
>= 11.1
8.8 - 11.1
5.7 - 8.8
3.6 - 5.7
2.1 - 3.6
0.5 - 2.1
Calms: 2.22%
TOTAL COUNT:
2928 hrs.
CALM WINDS:
2.22%
DATA PERIOD:
2009 Jun 1 - Sep 3000:00 - 23:00
AVG. WIND SPEED:
3.75 m/s
DISPLAY:
Wind SpeedDirection (blowing from)
2016
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 185 -
3) October to November (post monsoon season)
WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software
WIND ROSE PLOT:
Post monsoon season - October to November
COMMENTS:
MODELER:
Aqua Tech Enviro Engineers
DATE:
9/15/2012
PROJECT NO.:
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST EAST
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
WIND SPEED
(m/s)
>= 11.1
8.8 - 11.1
5.7 - 8.8
3.6 - 5.7
2.1 - 3.6
0.5 - 2.1
Calms: 11.34%
TOTAL COUNT:
1464 hrs.
CALM WINDS:
11.34%
DATA PERIOD:
2009 Oct 1 - Nov 3000:00 - 23:00
AVG. WIND SPEED:
2.49 m/s
DISPLAY:
Wind SpeedDirection (blowing from)
2016
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 186 -
4) December to February (winter season)
WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software
WIND ROSE PLOT:
Winter season - December to February
COMMENTS:
MODELER:
Aqua Tech Enviro Engineers
DATE:
9/15/2012
PROJECT NO.:
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST EAST
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
WIND SPEED
(m/s)
>= 11.1
8.8 - 11.1
5.7 - 8.8
3.6 - 5.7
2.1 - 3.6
0.5 - 2.1
Calms: 21.57%
TOTAL COUNT:
2160 hrs.
CALM WINDS:
21.57%
DATA PERIOD:
2009 Check Date Range Report00:00 - 23:00
AVG. WIND SPEED:
2.04 m/s
DISPLAY:
Wind SpeedDirection (blowing from)
2016
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 187 -
3.2.7 INVERSION HEIGHT The maximum inversion heights at the project site during the day time & night time for all the months of the year is as given in the table 3.1. The maximum mixing height of 3823 m is observed during the month of May during the day time and 3289 m during the month of June during the night time. The minimum inversion heights are 1901 m during the day & 787 m during the night both in the month of December. 3.2.8 CLOUD COVER
The minimum cover measured in the unit of tenths is 2 and the maximum observed cloud cover is 10.
3.3 BASELINE MONITORING
3.3.1 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
AIR QUALITY
PM10 and PM2.5 have been estimated by gravimetric method. Modified West and Gaeke
Method (IS: 5182 Part – II, 1969) has been adopted for estimation of SO2. Jacobs –
Hochheiser Method (IS: 5182 Part-VI, 1975) has been adopted for the estimation of NOx.
NDIRS (Non-Dispersive Infra Red Spectroscopic) Method (IS: 5182 Part-X, 1999) has been
adopted for the estimation of CO and Electrochem sensor method has been adopted for
the estimation of Ozone. Spectrophotometric method for ammonia, AAS (Atomic
Absorption Spectrophotometry) method for lead. Summary of the analytical techniques
and their references are appended in the following table 3.2 & Protocol for surface water
quality & ground water quality monitoring is detailed in table 3.3 & 3.4 and Equipments
used for noise & soil monitoring is stated in table 3.5.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 188 -
Table: 3.2: Techniques adopted/Protocols for ambient air quality monitoring
SL.
No
Parameters Techniques Technical
Protocol
Minimum
detectable limits
as provided by lab
1 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) West & Gaeke IS:5182 (P2) 4 mcg
2 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Jacob & Hochheiser IS:5182 (P6) 1 mcg
3 Particulate Matter PM10 Gravimetric IS:5182 (P15) 5 mcg
4 Particulate Matter
PM2.5
Gravimetric - 5 mcg
5 Ozone (O3) Electrochem sensor - NIL
6 Ammonia as NH3 Spectrophotometric Handbook of air
pollution
analysis
NIL
7 Carbon monoxide as CO NDIR IS: 5182 (P-10) 10 mcg
8 Lead as Pb AAS IS:5182 (P22) 0.01 mcg
WATER QUALITY
Table: 3.3: Protocol for surface water quality monitoring
Sl.
No.
Parameter/Test Protocol
Physical parameters
1 pH IS: 3025 (P 11)
2 Suspended solids IS: 3025 (P 17)
3 Color & odor IS: 3025 (P 4&5)
4 Oil & grease IS: 3025 (P 39)
Chemicals parameters
5 Total dissolved solids IS: 3025 (P 16)
6 Ammoniacal nitrogen, as N IS: 3025 (P 34)
7 Total kjeldahl nitrogen, as N IS: 3025 (P 34)
8 Biochemical Oxygen Demand at
270 C for 3 days
IS: 3025 (P 44)
9 Chemical Oxygen Demand APHA
10 Chlorides, as Cl IS: 3025 (P 32)
11 Sulfates, as SO4 IS: 3025 (P 24)
12 Nitrates, as NO3 IS: 3025 (P 34)
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 189 -
13 Phosphates, as PO4 IS: 3025 (P 31)
14 Phenolic compounds, as C6H5OH IS: 3025 (P 43)
15 Total hardness, as CaCO3 IS: 3025 (P 21)
16 Calcium, as Ca IS: 3025 (P 40)
17 Magnesium, as Mg IS: 3025 (P 46)
18 Nitrates, as NO2 IS: 3025 (P 34)
19 Alkalinity, as CaCO3 IS: 3025 (P 23)
20 Fluoride, as F IS: 3025 (P 60)
21 Electrical conductivity APHA
22 Dissolved oxygen, mg/L -
Table: 3.4: Protocol for ground water quality monitoring
Sl.
No.
Parameter/Test Unit Protocol
1 Color True color units IS: 3025 (P 4)
2 Odor - IS: 3025 (P 5)
3 Taste - IS: 3025 (P 8)
4 Turbidity NTU IS: 3025 (P 10)
5 pH - IS: 3025 (P 11)
6 Chlorides as Cl mg/L AN-S-003
7 Total hardness as CaCO3 mg/L IS: 3025 (P 21)
8 Calcium as Ca mg/L IS: 3025 (P 40)
9 Magnesium as Mg mg/L IS: 3025 (P 46)
10 Total dissolved solids mg/L IS: 3025 (P 16)
11 Sulfates as SO4 mg/L AN-S-003
12 Copper as Cu mg/L IS: 3025 (P 42)
13 Iron as Fe mg/L IS: 3025 (P 53)
14 Manganese as Mn mg/L IS: 3025 (P 59)
15 Nitrate as NO3 mg/L AN-S-003
16 Fluoride as F mg/L AN-S-003
17 Phenolic compounds as C6H5OH mg/L IS: 3025 (P 43)
18 Mercury as Hg mg/L IS: 3025 (P 48)
19 Cadmium as Cd mg/L IS: 3025 (P 41)
20 Selenium as Se mg/L IS: 3025 (P 56)
21 Arsenic as As mg/L IS: 3025 (P 37)
22 Cyanide as CN mg/L APHA
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 190 -
23 Lead as Pb mg/L IS: 3025 (P 47)
24 Zinc as Zn mg/L IS: 3025 (P 49)
25 Anionic detergents as MBAS mg/L Annex K of
IS:13428
26 Chromium as Cr+6 mg/L IS: 3025 (P 52)
27 Residual free chlorine mg/L IS: 3025 (P 26)
28 Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/L IS: 3025 (P 23)
29 Aluminum as Al mg/L IS: 3025 (P 55)
30 Boron as B mg/L APHA
NOISE & SOIL MONITORING
Table: 3.5: Equipments used for noise & soil monitoring
Noise levels were measured using integrated sound level meter & soil quality using pH
meter, Conductivity meter, Turbidity Meter, Flame Photometer, Spectro photometer,
Mercury Analyzer, Oven, Electronic Balance
3.3.2 AIR QUALITY
The baseline air quality was established by monitoring major air pollutants like suspended
particulate matter, oxides of sulfur & nitrogen at various locations near the project site.
High volume samplers were used for ambient air sampling. Suspended Particulate Matter
(SPM) i.e. PM2.5 & PM10, sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), NH3, Pb, O3,
Benzo(a) pyrene in particulate phase, As, Ni, CO etc. were determined. Samples were
collected continuously from all the stations for 24 hours. Samples thus collected were
analyzed for various pollutants as above.
Baseline data for ambient air quality was collected during the months of of December, 2016 & January & February 2017. The sampling stations along with their distance and direction from the project site, ambient air quality monitoring stations, wind rose diagram showing the direction of the blowing wind during the analysis period, ambient air quality analysis data & National Ambient Air Quality Standards specified by MoEF are detailed subsequently. To study the existing ambient air quality, monitoring was done by Bengalore Test House,
Bengalore.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 191 -
The observations made during the study period are presented under the forthcoming sub-
sections.
Methodology adopted for the study
The baseline status of the ambient air has been established through a scientifically
designed ambient air quality monitoring network. The following criteria were taken into
account during selection of the sampling stations:
Topography of the area
Human settlements within the study area
Safety, accessibility and non-interference with general routine of the people
residing near the station
Prediction of maximum concentration of the air pollutants through dispersion
modeling for the proposed source details using prevailing meteorological
conditions in the region
The Ambient air sampling stations details is shown in the below table 3.6.
Table 3.6: Ambient air sampling stations
Sl. No.
Code no. Name of the station Direction from the site
Distance from site (km)
1 A 1 Project site - -
2 A 2 Chiksugur (downwind direction)
West 1
3 A 3 Hanumandoddi North East 5
4 A 4 Yermaras South 5
5 A 5 Hospet South West 6
6 A 6 Shaktinagar North 5
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 192 -
Fig 3.2: Wind rose diagram – December to February (sampling period)
WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software
WIND ROSE PLOT:
Winter season - December to February
COMMENTS:
MODELER:
Aqua Tech Enviro Engineers
DATE:
9/15/2012
PROJECT NO.:
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST EAST
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
WIND SPEED
(m/s)
>= 11.1
8.8 - 11.1
5.7 - 8.8
3.6 - 5.7
2.1 - 3.6
0.5 - 2.1
Calms: 21.57%
TOTAL COUNT:
2160 hrs.
CALM WINDS:
21.57%
DATA PERIOD:
2009 Check Date Range Report00:00 - 23:00
AVG. WIND SPEED:
2.04 m/s
DISPLAY:
Wind SpeedDirection (blowing from)
2017
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 193 -
3.3.2.1 AIR QUALITY AT ALL LOCATION:
Ambient air quality analysis was conducted at the project site for 3 months from
December 2016 to Febraury 2017. The Air quality data analysis at the project site are
appended in the table 3.7, Air quality data analysis at other locations in the table 3.8
& Ambient air quality standards – MoEF as per the notification dated 16th November 2009
for industrial, residential & rural areas is shown table 3.7 below.
Table 3.7: Air quality data analysis results
Sl. No.
Parameter Description 24 Hrs concentration (µg/m3) Monitoring station
A1 A 2 A 3
A 4 A 5 A 6 1. Particulate matter
(size less than 2.5
µm), (PM2.5) ,µg/m3
December 24 12 14 17 15 15
Janaury 27 15 15 14 12 17
Febraury 29 19 17 18 17 20
Average 26.6 15.33 15.33 16.33 14.66 17.33
2. Particulate matter
(size less than 10
µm), (PM10), µg/m3
December 50 33 34 33 33 31
Janaury 53 35 35 36 36 33
Febraury 60 39 37 39 37 35
Average 54.33 35.66 35.33 36 35.33 33
3. Sulfur dioxide (SO2),
µg/m3
December 11.6 6.9 5.4 8.6 7.6 7.5
Janaury 13.7 7.3 6.5 7.9 7.8 8.1
Febraury 15.2 8.0 7.7 9.2 8.6 8.5
Average 13.5 7.4 6.5 8.5 8 8.0
4. Nitrogen oxides
(NOx), µg/m3
December 9.20 7.1 7.6 6.5 7.2 6.5
Janaury 11.5 8.6 9.1 9.5 9.6 8.5
Febraury 12.4 9.4 9.4 7.9 8.4 9.9
Average 11.03 8.36 8.8 7.9 8.4 8.3
5. NH3, µg/m3 -
ND 6. Pb, µg/m3 -
7. O3, µg/m3 - 10 - 14
8. C6H6, µg/m3 -
ND 9. Benzo(a) pyrene in particulate phase, ng/m3
-
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 194 -
10. As, ng/m3 -
<0.01 11. Ni, ng/m3 -
12. CO, mg/m3 - 0.1 – 0.5
13. HC, ppm -
ND 14. Volatile Organic Compounds. (VOCs), ppm
-
Table 3.8: Ambient air quality standards – MoEF as per the notification dated 16th
November 2009 for industrial, residential & rural areas
Air quality parameter Concentration
24 hrs Annual
1 Particulate matter (size less than 2.5 µm), (PM2.5) ,µg/m3 60 40
2 Particulate matter (size less than 10 µm), (PM10), µg/m3 100 60
3 Sulfur-di-oxide (SO2), µg/m3 80 50
4 Nitrogen dioxide (NOx), µg/m3 80 40
5 Ammonia (NH3), µg/m3 400 100
6 Lead (Pb), µg/m3 1 0.5
7 Ozone (O3), µg/m3 180 – 1
hr
100 – 8
hrs
8 Benzene (C6H6), µg/m3 - 5
9 Carbon monoxide (CO), mg/m3 4 – 1 hr 2 – 8 hrs
10 Arsenic (As), ng/m3 - 6
11 Nickel (Ni), ng/m3 - 20
12 Benzo(a) pyrene in particulate phase, ng/m3 - 1
13 Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), µg/m3 - NS
Note:
24 hourly or 08 hourly or 01 hourly monitored values, as applicable, shall be complied
with 98% of the time in a year. 2% of the time, they may exceed the limits but not on
two consecutive days of monitoring.
Whenever and wherever monitoring results on two constitutive days of monitoring
exceed the limits specified above for the respective category, it shall be considered
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 195 -
adequate reason to institute regular or continuous monitoring and further
investigation.
3.3.2.2 OBSERVATIONS
The monitored values observed at the all location are in the range of
Sl. No.
Parameter 24 Hrs concentration (µg/m3) Monitoring station
At all locations
15 PM2.5, µg/m3 14.66-26.6 16 PM10, µg/m3 33-54.33 17 SO2, µg/m3 6.5-13.5
18 NOx, µg/m3 7.9-11.03 19 NH3, µg/m3 ND 20 Pb, µg/m3 ND 21 O3, µg/m3 10-14 22 C6H6, µg/m3
ND 23 Benzo(a) pyrene in particulate phase, ng/m3
24 As, ng/m3 <0.01
25 Ni, ng/m3
26 CO, mg/m3 0.1-0.5
27 HC, ppm ND 28 Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs), ppm
The monitored values are within the limits specified by MoEF (as per the notification dated 16th November 2009 for industrial, residential & rural areas). At all the other locations it has been observed that the maximum concentration of all the parameters monitored at all the locations are within the limits specified by MoEF.
3.3.3 NOISE ENVIRONMENT
The proposed project M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., will result in moderate increase in
traffic during the construction phase due to movement of construction materials, tools
and tackles, laborers required for construction. Since it is an expansion project
construction activities will be minimum as optimum utilization of the existing
infrastructural facilities will be made.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 196 -
The proposed project is an Herbal Extract and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) &
Intermediates manufacturing industry with R&D activity and hence requires movement
of raw materials, chemicals, fuels, tools & tackles required for its manufacturing process
and also transportation of finished products to its destination. The movement of
personnel from their residence to industry would also result in a moderate increase in the
traffic, which would not result in any drastic change in either the existing traffic pattern
or noise levels of the area.
Background noise levels were measured in 6 locations. A sound level meter was used for
measuring the noise level at one-hour interval continuously for 24 hrs at 1.5 m above
ground level, about 3 m from walls, buildings or other sound reflecting sources.
The measurements were carried out in such a way that the monitoring locations were 1
m away from the sources and 1 m away from the edge of the roads. The lowest & highest
noise levels and the limits as per Environmental Protection Rules, 1986 for both industrial
and commercial areas are presented in the following table 3.11 and summary of noise
levels is shown in table 3. 10. And the Photographs Showing the Noise Monitoring during
Baseline Data Collection is shown in fig 3.9
Table 3.9: Noise level monitoring stations
Sl. No.
Code no. Name of the station Direction from the site
Distance from site (km)
1 N 1 Project site - -
2 N 2 Chiksugur (downwind direction)
West 1
3 N 3 Hanumandoddi North East 5
4 N 4 Yermaras South 5
5 N 5 Hospet South West 6
6 N 6 Shaktinagar North 5
Table 3.10: Summary of noise levels
Sl. No. Code No. Name of the Station Lowest
dB (A)
Highest dB
(A)
1 N 1 Project site 40.7 49.0
2 N 2 Chiksugur (downwind direction)
31.5 43.8
3 N 3 Hanumandoddi 37.8 46.4
4 N 4 Yermaras 37.3 47.5
5 N 5 Hospet 38.3 48.6
6 N 6 Shaktinagar 41.8 45.8
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 197 -
Table 3.11: Limits as per Environmental Protection Rules, 1986
Limits as per Env. Protection Rules, 1986 in dB(A)Leq
Industrial area Commercial area Residential area Silent zone
Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night
75 70 65 55 55 45 50 40
3.3.3.1 OBSERVATIONS
The baseline noise levels have been monitored at different locations as indicated in the table above. The noise levels in the study area varies between 31.5 – 49. It has been observed that the maximum noise levels at all the locations are within the limits specified for industrial areas. Marginally high values at Shaktinagar is due to the operation of power plant.
3.3.4 WATER ENVIRONMENT
3.3.4.1 RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY
The impact has been assessed on randomly selected surface and ground water sources
falling within the impact zone.
In order to assess the existing water quality, the water samples were collected three
different locations within the study area and analyzed as per the procedure specified in
standard methods for examination of water and wastewater published by American
Public Health Association and Bureau of Indian Standards (APHA/BIS). Name of the
locations, orientation with respect to the project site along with the type of source, the
analytical data for surface water quality and ground water quality at all locations has been
depicted in the following table 3.12 .
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 198 -
Table 3.12: Water sampling stations
Sl.
No.
Code
No.
Name of the Station Direction
from site
Distance
from
site (km)
Source/ Type
10 GW 1 Project site - - Borewell
11 GW 2 Chiksugur (downwind direction)
West 1 Borewell
12 GW 3 Hanumandoddi North East 5 Borewell
13 GW 4 Yermaras South 5 Borewell
14 GW 5 Hospet South West 6 Borewell
15 GW 6 Shaktinagar North 5 Borewell
16 SW 1 Krishna river upstream North West 14.6 River
17 SW2 Krishna river downstream
North 7.4 River
18 SW3 Konad Halla North West 2.3 Canal
3.3.4.2 SURFACE WATER
The water requirement of about 12 KLD for the proposed Project will be met by Borewell
water supply source.
The results of the analysis of surface water sample collected from the Kabini River is
appended in the following table 3.13
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 199 -
Table 3.13: Surface water quality
Sl No
Tests Results Maximum Acceptable
Limits As per IS:10500-1991
Maximum Permissible Limits in the Absence of Alternate Source As Per IS:10500-
1991
W1 (Krishna river
upstream)
W2 (Krishna river downstream)
1 Color (Hazen Units) 6 6 5 25
2 Odour Un-objectionable
Un-objectionable
Un-objectionable
-
3 Taste Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable -
4 pH 7.63 7.60 6.50-8.50 No relaxation
5 Turbidity, NTU 8 9 5 10
6 Total Hardness as CaCO3, mg/L
135 125 300 600
7 Iron, as Fe, mg/L 0.30 0.30 0.30 1.0
8 Chlorides, as Cl, mg/L
45 47 250 1000
9 Residual free chlorine, mg/L
Nil Nil 0.2 – desirable limit
-
10 Total dissolved solids, mg/L
320 336 500 2000
11 Calcium, as Ca, mg/L
32 30 75 200
12 Manganeese, as Mg, mg/L
13 12 30 100
13 Nitrates, as NO3 , mg/L
1.0 1.0 45 No relaxation
14 Sulphates, as SO4, mg/L
58 51 200 400
15 Fluorides, as F, mg/L
0.60 0.60 1.0 1.5
16 Alkalinity, as CaCO3, mg/L
120 120 200 600
17 Copper as Cu, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 0.05 1.5
18 Magnesium as Mn, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 30 100
19 Phenolic Compounds as C6H5OH, mg/L
<0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.002
20 Mercury as Hg, mg/L
<0.001 <0.001 0.001 No relaxation
21 Cadmium ad Cd, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 0.01 No relaxation
22 Selenium as Se, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 0.01 No relaxation
23 Arsenic as As, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 0.01 No relaxation
24 Cyanide as CN, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 0.05 No relaxation
25 Lead as Pb, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 0.05 No relaxation
26 Zinc as Zn, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 5 15
27 Anionic detergents (as MBAS)
Absent Absent 0.20 1.0
28 Chromium as Cr6+,mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 0.05 No relaxation
29 Poly nuclear aromatic Hydrocarbons (as PAH)
Absent Absent - -
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 200 -
30 Mineral Oil, mg/L Absent Absent 0.01 0.03
31 Pesticides mg/L Absent Absent Absent -
32 Radioactive materials a. Alpha emitters, µCi/mL, max b. Beta emitters, µCi/mL, max
Absent Absent a. 10-8 b. 10-7
-
33 Aluminium as Al, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 0.03 0.2
34 Boron as B, mg/L 0.04 0.05 1.00 5.0
Surface water quality – canal
Sl No
Tests Results Maximum Acceptable
Limits As per IS:10500-1991
Maximum Permissible Limits in the Absence of Alternate Source As
Per IS:10500-
1991
W 3 (Konad Halla)
1 Color (Hazen Units) 4 5 25
2 Odour Un-objectionable
Un-objectionable
-
3 Taste Agreeable Agreeable -
4 pH 8.17 6.50-8.50 No relaxation
5 Turbidity, NTU 22 5 10
6 Total Hardness as CaCO3, mg/L
125 300 600
7 Iron, as Fe, mg/L 0.40 0.30 1.0
8 Chlorides, as Cl, mg/L 37 250 1000
9 Residual free chlorine, mg/L Nil 0.2 – desirable limit
-
10 Total dissolved solids, mg/L 274 500 2000
11 Calcium, as Ca, mg/L 30 75 200
12 Magnesium, as Mg, mg/L 12 30 100
13 Nitrates, as NO3 , mg/L 3.0 45 No relaxation 14 Sulphates, as SO4, mg/L 35 200 400
15 Fluorides, as F, mg/L 0.60 1.0 1.5
16 Alkalinity, as CaCO3, mg/L 110 200 600
17 Copper as Cu, mg/L <0.01 0.05 1.5
18 Manganeese as Mn, mg/L <0.01 30 100
19 Phenolic Compounds as C6H5OH, mg/L
<0.001 0.001 0.002
20 Mercury as Hg, mg/L <0.001 0.001 No relaxation 21 Cadmium ad Cd, mg/L <0.01 0.01 No relaxation
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 201 -
22 Selenium as Se, mg/L <0.01 0.01 No relaxation 23 Arsenic as As, mg/L <0.01 0.01 No relaxation 24 Cyanide as CN, mg/L <0.01 0.05 No relaxation 25 Lead as Pb, mg/L <0.01 0.05 No relaxation 26 Zinc as Zn, mg/L <0.01 5 15
27 Anionic detergents (as MBAS) Absent 0.20 1.0
28 Chromium as Cr6+,mg/L <0.01 0.05 No relaxation 29 Poly nuclear aromatic
Hydrocarbons (as PAH) Absent - -
30 Mineral Oil, mg/L Absent 0.01 0.03
31 Pesticides mg/L Absent Absent -
32 Radioactive materials a. Alpha emitters, µCi/mL, max b. Beta emitters, µCi/mL, max
Absent a. 10-8 b. 10-7
-
33 Aluminum as Al, mg/L <0.01 0.03 0.2
34 Boron as B, mg/L 0.08 1.00 5.0
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 202 -
3.3.4.3 GROUND WATER
Ground water is the major source of water in the district, occurring under water table conditions in the weathered mantle of granite
gneisses and in the joints, cracks and crevices of the basement rock. The depth of water is also dependent on topography and varies
depending on the depth of weathering.
The results of the analysis of Ground water samples collected from the project site and others locations is appended in the following table 3.14.
Table 3.14: Ground water quality
Sl. No
Tests Results Maximum Acceptable
Limits As per IS:10500-
1991
Maximum Permissible Limits in the Absence of
Alternate Source As Per IS:10500-
1991
GW1
GW1
GW 3
GW 4
GW 5
GW6
1 Color (Hazen Units)
Clear <5 <5 Clear <5 <5 5 25
2 Odour UO UO UO UO UO UO UO -
3 Taste A A A A A A A -
4 pH 7.9 7.89 7.48 7.61 7.61 8.12 6.50-8.50 No relaxation
5 Turbidity, NTU 2.9 3.0 2.0 4.2 1.0 2.0 5 10
6 Total hardness as CaCO3, mg/L
310 250 175 205 700 150 300 600
7 Iron, as Fe, mg/L 0.19 0.14 0.15 0.30 0.10 0.15 0.30 1.0
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 203 -
8 Chlorides, as Cl ,mg/L
205 159 162 102 230 85 250 1000
9 Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L
448 425 430 366 380 410 500 2000
10 Residual free chlorine, mg/L
Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil 0.2 – desirable
limit
-
11 Calcium, as Ca, mg/L
62 35 44 39 40 42 75 200
12 Magnesium, as Mg, mg/L
22.5 18 16 19.5 22 11 30 100
13 Nitrates, as NO3 , mg/L
11 19 21 15 16 26 45 No relaxation
14 Sulphates, as SO4, mg/L
105 98 77 68 126 37 200 400
15 Fluorides, as F, mg/L
0.53 0.60 0.90 0.66 1.35 1.20 1.0 1.5
16 Alkalinity, as CaCO3, mg/L
151 145 160 148 160 115 200 600
17 Copper as Cu, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05 1.5
18 Manganeese as Mn, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 30 100
19 Phenolic Compounds as C6H5OH, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 <0.001 Absent <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.002
20 Mercury as Hg, mg/L
<0.001
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 No relaxation
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 204 -
21 Cadmium ad Cd, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 No relaxation
22 Selenium as Se, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 No relaxation
23 Arsenic as As, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 No relaxation
24 Cyanide as CN, mg/L
Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil 0.05 No relaxation
25 Lead as Pb, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05 No relaxation
26 Zinc as Zn, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.01 5 15
27 Anionic detergents (as MBAS)
Absent
Absent Absent Absent Absent 0.20 1.0
28 Chromium as Cr6+,mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05 No relaxation
29 Poly nuclear aromatic Hydrocarbons (as PAH)
Absent
Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent - -
30 Mineral Oil, mg/L Absent
Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent 0.01 0.03
31 Pesticides mg/L Absent
Absent Absent Absent <0.001 Absent Absent -
32 Radioactive materials a. Alpha emitters, µCi/mL, max
Absent
Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent a. 10-8 b. 10-7
-
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 205 -
b. Beta emitters, µCi/mL, max
33 Aluminum as Al, mg/L
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.03 0.2
34 Boron as B, mg/L 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.06 1.00 5.0
35 Colifrom MPN/100 mL
Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil 1 coliform/100 mL
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 206 -
3.3.4.4 OBSERVATIONS
The analysis of samples collected from the lakes for various parameters reveals that the
quality of water is within the maximum acceptable limits as per IS:10500-1991.the water is
treated before discharging to users.
The physicochemical quality of the ground water sources at and around the plant site has
been analyzed, which indicates that almost all the parameters analyzed are within “Maximum
Acceptable Limits As per IS:10500-2012” & few parameters like alkalinity are within the
“Maximum Permissible Limits in the Absence of Alternate Source As Per IS:10500-2012”.
The observations made are tabulated below table 3.15
Table: - 3.15 Observations
Sl. no.
Parameter Surface water Ground water
5 pH 7.6 - 8.17 7.48 - 8.12
6 Total dissolved solids, mg/L 274 - 336 366 - 448
7 Total hardness, mg/L 125 - 135 150 – 700
8 Fluoride, mg/L 0.60 0.53 – 1.35
3.3.5 SOIL AND GEOLOGY
Soil characteristics, erosion aspects, soil fertility etc., have direct bearing on the environment. Knowledge of soil parameters is essential for the planning and implementation of green belt. Hence it becomes important to study the soil characteristics. Baseline data for land environment was collected at Six locations in order to assess the soil quality of the study area. Soil samples at a depth of one and half feet were collected using sampling augers, spades and field capacity apparatus. The list of locations and the orientation with reference to the project site are listed in table 3.16. Soil samples were analyzed for physical and chemical parameters the results of which are given in table 3.17 and sampling locations marked in the Google map is shown in fig 3.3.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 207 -
Table 3.16: Soil sampling stations
Sl.
No.
Name of the Station Direction from
site
Distance
from site
(km)
1 Project site - -
2 Chikkanagamangala North 1.58
3 Huskur North east 2.50
4 Shantipura (Vaddarapally) South East 1.75
5 Hebbagodi South 2.65
6 Doddathoguru West 3.91
Table 3.17: Physico-chemical characteristics of soil
Sl.
no.
Parameters Unit Results
Sampling station S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6
1 pH value (20 % solution) - 9.35 8.32 8.45 8.04 7.69 7.96
2 Organic colids % 6.2 5.6 6.35 7.89 8.20 9.15
3 Chlorides, as Cl % 0.015 0.013 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.019
4 Phosphorous, as P % 0.009 0.015 0.018 0.016 0.012 0.007
5 Nitrogen, as N % 0.078 0.046 0.059 0.07 0.05 0.051
6 Potassium, as K % 0.13 0.15 0.17 0.13 0.08 0.01
7 Iron, as Fe % 5.9 3.2 6.35 4.9 5.8 6.2
8 Sulphates, as SO4 % 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.016 0.012
9 Calcium, as Ca, % % 0.05 0.043 0.12 0.11 0.32 0.20
10 Magnesium, as Mg, % % 0.032 0.046 0.11 0.04 0.043 0.17
11 Conductivity micromhos/cm
(20% Suspension)@ 25 deg C
µs/cm 123.0 132.0 148.0 189.0 115.0 79.0
12 Moisture % 1.9 0.72 2.3 3.6 1.32 5.9
13 Inorganic solids % 98.2 95.0 93.6 95.6 92.7 87.2
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 208 -
Fig 3.3: Location of sampling stations
Source: Google Earth
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 209 -
Table 3.18: LOCATION OF SAMPLING STATIONS
Sl.no. Code.No Description Direction Distance Sampling Stations No.
1 A1 Project site - - A1, N1, W1,S1
2 A2 Chiksugur (downwind direction) West 1 A2, N2, W2,S2
3 A3 Hanumandoddi North East 5 A3, N3, W3,S3
4 A4 Yermaras South 5 A4, N4, W4,S4
6 A5 Hospet South West 6 A5, N5, W5,S5
7 A6 Shaktinagar North 5 A6, N6, W6,S6
8 SW1 Krishna river upstream North West 14.6 SW1
9 SW2 Krishna river downstream North 7.4 SW2
10 SW3 Konad Halla North West 2.3 SW3
3.4 ECOLOGY
Natural flora and fauna are important features of the environment. They are organized into
natural communities with mutual dependencies among their members and show various
responses and sensitivities to physical innocence. The integrated ecological thinking and planning
process is an urgent need in the context of natural environment's deterioration which has a direct
bearing on socio-economic development.
Ecological survey of the study area was carried out by actual field visits of the lease area to
observe the various species of flora and fauna. Personal enquiries/discussion with local people
and forest department officials was also conducted to get a fair idea of the existing ecological
status.
The area does not have any hiding place for wild life and hence they are not spotted in the area.
The flora and fauna existing in the study area is presented below.
3.4.1 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
The impact can be considered insignificant as the region consists of only skeletal Vegetation like
grasses & thorny shrubs with no rare & endangered species. As the Project activity will be limited
only to the core zone and mitigative measures will be implemented to contain air and noise
pollution, there shall be no damage to the flora of the buffer zone.
The area is not a significant faunal habitat. No deforestation will take place in the Buffer zone.
Thus, the impact on fauna of the buffer zone will be minimal.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 210 -
3.4.2 FLORA
Land use pattern within the study zone is industrial oriented with rural village settings. Floral
composition in the study area is presented in the table 3.19 below.
Table 3.19: Flora in the study area
Sl. No.
Botanical name Common name
1 Alangium lamarckii Ankola
2 Acacia nilotica Karijali
3 Aegle marmelos Bilpathre
4 Azadirachta indica Bevu
5 Albizzia amara Tugli
6 Aloe vera Lolesara
7 Albezzia lebbeck Bage
8 Acacia senegal Mugli
9 Acacia chundra Kagglia
10 Acacia leucophloea Kikar
11 Abrus precatorius Gulaganji
12 Annona squamosa Sitaphal
13 Acacia catechu Kaggali
14 Bauhinia racemosa Ari Basavanapada
15 Boswellia serrata Dhupa
16 Buchanania lanzan Chironji
17 Bassia latifolia Mokhab
18 Butea monosperma Muthuga
19 Butea superba Palash lata
20 Cassia fistula Kokke
21 Careya arborea Kaval
22 Chloroxylon Hugagalu
23 Cassia auriculata Tangadi
24 Carissa carandas Kawli hannu
25 Cochlospermum White silk cotton
26 Diospyros Tupra
27 Dodonaea viscosa Junglianar
28 Emblica officinalis Nelli
29 Eugenia jambolana Neral
30 Ficus infectoria Jir
31 Ficus bengalensis Ala
32 Ficus religiosa Arli
33 Mangifera India Mavu
34 Moringa tinctoria Moogilli
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 211 -
35 Nyctanthes Kumbala
36 Pongamia pinnata Honge
37 Prosopis juliflora Bellary jail
38 Syzygium cumini Nerale
39 Aptuda mutica Karru guddi
40 Cymbopogon Coloratus Bodha
3.4.3 FAUNA
The area under consideration is not suitable for any rare or endangered or endemic or threatened
wildlife as there are no forests or other protected areas. Fauna observed in the region include
domestic animals, retiles and birds. The composition of fauna in the study area is presented in
the table 3.20 below.
Table 3.20: Fauna in the study area
MAMMALS
Sl.
No.
Scientific name Common name
1 Bandicota bengalensis Lesser Bandicoot
2 Bandicota indica Greater bandicoot
3 Lupus nibricollis Indian hare
4 Macaca mulatto Rhesus macaque
5 Mus booduga Indian field rat
6 Oryctolagus cuniculus Rabbit
7 Varanus indicus Common mongoose
8 Funambulus palmarum Three striped palm squrrel
REPTILES
9 Bungarus caeruleus Common Indian krait
10 Calotes versicolor Garden lizard
11 Chameleon zeylanicus Chameleon
12 Dryphis sp. Tree snake
13 Hemidactylus flaviviridis Indian wall lizard
14 Hemidactylus triedrus Termite hill gecko
15 Naja naja Cobra
16 Ptyas mucosus Rat snake
17 Ramphotyphliops braminus Brahminy blind snake
18 Typhlops porrectus Slender blind snake
19 Vipera russeli Russell’s viper
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 212 -
AMPHIBIANS
20 Rana hexadactyla Ordinary frog
21 Bufo melonosticatus South Indian Toad
22 Hyla arboria Tree frog
23 Cacopus bystema Burrowing frog
24 Rana tigrina Tiger frog
BIRDS
25 Acridothers trists Myna
26 Athene brama Owl, spotted
27 Bubulcus ibis Cattle egret
28 Centrpus sinesis Crow pheasant
29 Columbia livaia Pigeon, blue rock
30 Corvus macrohyuchos Jungle crow
31 Corvus splendens Crow
32 Cuculus varus Cuckoo
33 Egretta garetta Egret, little
34 Eudynamis scolopaceus Koel
35 Francolinus pondicerianus Partridge, grey
36 Hirando rustica Swallow, common
37 Lonchura striata Munia, spotted
38 Pavo cristatus Common peafowl
39 Ploceus philippinus Weaver bird, common
40 Psittacula eupatria Parakeet Large Indian
41 Psittacula krameri Parakeet, rose-ringed
42 Saxicoloides fulicata Indian robin
3.5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
The baseline data referring to the socio-economic environment is collected by way of secondary
sources such as census records, statistical hand book and relevant official records with the
government agencies and primary sources such as the socio-economic surveys conducted by
different Govt. & Non Govt. Agencies.
The growth of industrial sectors and infrastructure development in and around the agricultural
area i.e. villages and semi-urban settings and towns is bound to create certain socio-economic
impacts on the local populace. The impacts may be either positive or negative depending on the
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 213 -
nature of development. To assess such impact it is necessary to know the existing socio-economic
order of the study area, which will be helpful in improving the overall quality of life.
3.6 DEMOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE
The information collected from the secondary sources are from the district census statistical hand books and the records of the National Informatics Center, New Delhi in respect of the population, infrastructure facilities available and the occupational structures of the study area. The socio-ecological aspect of the study include the agro based economy, industry based economy and occupational structure of the workers. The study has been divided in to three zones which include the core and buffer zones which are presented as table 3.21 below.
Table 3.21: Break-up of the study area
Study area Zones considered for the study
0 - 5 km Zone - I (Chiksugur)
5 - 10 km Zone - II (Shaktinagar)
10 – 15 Zone – III (Raichur)
The distributions of population in the study area as per the census record of the 2011 are presented as table 3.22 below.
Table 3.22: Distribution of population
Particulars 0-5 km
radius
5-10 km
radius
10-15 km
radius
2011 2011 2011
Total residential houses 584 3802 52001
Total population 2815 17088 264564
Population male 1440 8632 131899
Population female 1375 8456 132665
Schedule caste male 315 2061 29361
Schedule caste female 288 1969 29229
Schedule tribe male 6 407 26458
Schedule tribe female 5 395 26980
Literates male 997 6542 73276
Literates female 648 4855 46794
Main workers male 515 4255 62853
Main workers female 185 1376 41989
Marginal workers male 241 437 11285
Marginal workers female 175 296 18304
Non workers male 684 3940 57761
Non workers female 1015 6784 72372
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 214 -
Source: District census handbook
Male population – 51.6 % Female population – 48.4 % Sex ratio – 937 females per 1000 males Literacy levels The literacy level in the study area is appended as table 3.23 below
Table 3.23: Distribution of literates and literacy levels in the study area
Particulars 0-5 km radius
5-10 km radius
10-15 km radius
2011 2011 2011
Total population 2815 17088 264564
Total literate 1645
11397
120070
Literate male 997 6542 73276
% of Male literate 60.60 54.80 61.02
Literate female 648 4855 46794
% of Female literate
39.39 42.59 38.97
Source: District census hand book
3.6.1 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE AVAILABLE
Infrastructure is the basic physical and organizational structures needed for the operation of a
society or enterprise or the services and facilities necessary for an economy to function.
The term typically refers to the technical structures that support a society, such as roads, water
supply, sewers, electrical grids, telecommunications and so forth and can be defined as "the
physical components of interrelated systems providing commodities and services essential to
enable, sustain or enhance societal living conditions.
Viewed functionally, infrastructure facilitates the production of goods and services, and also the
distribution of finished products to markets, as well as basic social services such as schools and
hospitals; for example, roads enable the transport of raw materials to a factory.
The list of hospitals & other infrastructural facilities available in the vicinity of the proposed
industry is tabulated in below table 3.24.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 215 -
Table 3.24: List of infrastructural facilities in the surroundings
Sl. No.
Hospital Distance from the industry (km)
Direction w.r.t. the industry
1 Primary Health Center, Ramadurga
30 West
2 Rajiv Gandhi Memorial Hospital
9 South
3 Government Hospital, Raichur 10.1 South
4 Chaitanya Hospital 11.8 South West
5 Raichur railway station 11.6 South
6 Hyderabad airport 152 North East
Note: All distances mentioned are aerial.
3.7 CONNECTIVITY
Connectivity to the project site is detailed in the following table 3.25. Google map showing the
same is appended subsequently in fig 3.4.
Table 3.25: Connectivity from the project site
Sl. No.
Road Distance from the project site (km)
Direction w.r.t. project site
1 NH-167 & SH 51 1.0 West
2 Yedlapur Railway Station 8.69 North – West
3 Hyderabad airport 152 North East
4 Raichur railway station 11.6 South
5 Karnataka Andhra Pradesh border 8 North
Note: All distances mentioned are aerial
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 216 -
Fig 3.4: Google map showing connectivity
The details of 1 km, 5 km & 10 km distance google map is showing in below fig 3.5,3.6 & 3.7.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 217 -
Fig 3.5: GOOGLE MAP COVERING 1 KM AERIAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROJECT SITE
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 218 -
Fig 3.6: GOOGLE MAP COVERING 5 KM AERIAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROJECT SITE
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 219 -
Fig 3.7: GOOGLE MAP COVERING 10 KM AERIAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROJECT SITE
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 220 -
3.8 BASE MAPS OF ALL ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS
The major environmental components in the surroundings along with the distance & direction
from the project site are tabulated in below table 3.26. Google maps showing the locations of
the environmental parameters are appended as figure 3.8 below & the topo map of 10 km radius
is appended as Annexure - B.
Table 3.26: Existing land-use pattern
Sl. No.
Particulars Details Distance from the
project site (km)
Direction w.r.t. project
site
1 Agriculture Minor activities - scattered Beyond industrial
area
-
2 National park, forest Banerghatta national park 16 South West
3 Water bodies Raysandra lake 3 North west
Chikka tagur lake 3 East
Veersandra lake 2 South west
Hebbagodi lake 2.5 South
Kamasandra Lake 2.5 South East
Heelalige railway station 4.5 South east
Note:
a) All distances mentioned are aerial. b) The project is a notified by KIADB, Karnataka Govt. industrial area.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 221 -
Fig 3.8: Google map showing land-use pattern
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 222 -
CHAPTER 4
ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
4.1 DETAILS OF INVESTIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DUE TO PROJECT LOCATION,
POSSIBLE ACCIDENTS, PROJECT DESIGN, PROJECT CONSTRUCTION, REGULAR OPERATIONS,
FINAL DECOMMISSIONING OR REHABILITATION OF COMPLETED PROJECT
4.1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DUE TO PROJECT LOCATION, POSSIBLE ACCIDENTS, PROJECT
DESIGN
PROJECT LOCATION
Major environmental impacts due to project location is not anticipated because
The Environmental Clearance has been obtained from MOEF for the Active
Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediates manufacturing industry with R & D
activity vide EC letter no F.No. J-11011/71/2007-IA II (I) Dated March 12th 2008, and also
Consent for Establishment has obtained from KSPCB and since then the industry is in
operation with valid Consent for Operation from KSPCB.
Now the proponents intend to expansion and modification of an Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing
industry.
The industry is located in KIADB Industrial area, Raichur.
No national park is located in the vicinity (10 km radius - aerial).
POSSIBLE ACCIDENTS
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
The proposed project is expansion and modification of an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
(APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry with on-
going production activities. No major construction activities are proposed in the project as
optimum utilization of the existing infrastructural facilities will be made. Therefore
environmental impacts due to possible accidents are not anticipated.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 223 -
OPEARTION PHASE
PERSONAL SAFETY (PPE)
The following Personal Protection Equipments (PPE) are proposed to be provided
1. Helmet
2. Goggles
3. Nose masks
4. Uniform
5. Aprons
6. Hand gloves
7. Safety shoes
8. Face shield
PLANT SAFETY
The following measures and initiatives are proposed to ensure plant safety
1) Safety manual
2) MSDS
3) Onsite emergency plan
Fire extinguishers
Flame-proof fittings
Emergency no.s
4) Insurance coverage in case of fire (PLI)
5) Electric safety, audit
ENVIRONMENT SAFETY
The following measures are taken for environmental safety in case of accidents
1) Important telephone no.s
2) MSDS
3) Environment policy
4) Evacuation procedure
SAFETY AUDIT
1) Internal audit
2) SOP for safety audit
3) Safety training
4) First-aid training
5) Mock drill in case of emergency with respect to fire accident and handling of
extinguishers.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 224 -
HEALTH SAFETY
1) Annual medical check –up
2) Medi-claim scheme for all employees.
PROJECT DESIGN
The industry is designed with utmost consideration to the environment. A total area of 58,755.16 sq m i.e. 65.9 % of the total plot area is reserved exclusively for green-belt/landscape development.
4.1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DUE TO PROJECT CONSTRUCTION, REGULAR OPERATIONS
The Environmental Impact Statement enumerates the likely impacts due to the implementation
of the proposed project on the six basic environmental parameters, which are listed below.
1. Air environment
2. Noise environment
3. Water environment
4. Land environment
5. Biological environment
6. Socio-economic environment
The impacts on the above parameters have been identified, analyzed and classified as adverse,
beneficial impacts and the impact matrix is presented later in the report.
4.2 ACTIONS LIKELY TO AFFECT THE ENVIRONMENT
Table 4.3 enumerates the various activities of M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., which are likely to
have impact on the various environmental parameters. The impact matrix appended later (as
table 4.4) identifies all such impacts.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 225 -
4.2.1 AIR ENVIRONMENT
4.2.1.2 AIR ENVIRONMENT
4.2.1.2.1. CONSTRUCTION PHASE
The effect of the proposed project on the air environment is basically due to the construction
activities and establishment of pollution abatement systems that are undertaken for the project
which results in a marginal impact on the air environment deteriorating the air quality. Fugitive
dust emissions due to the movement of the construction materials, actual construction activity
and its related works are expected.
4.2.1.2.2 OPERATION PHASE
Pollutants in the form of oxides of nitrogen, sulfur & SPM from generators, boilers and thermic
fluid heater & acid mist/VOCs from the process section, contribute and cause certain impacts on
the air quality.
4.2.2 NOISE ENVIRONMENT
4.2.2.1 CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Construction activities and establishment of pollution abatement systems that are the major
sources of noise pollution during construction phase.
4.2.2.2 OPERATION PHASE
DG sets are the major noise generating sources during the operation phase. Also handling and
conveying of raw materials and semi-finished components to different operations can be
a source of noise pollution.
4.2.3 WATER ENVIRONMENT
4.2.3.1 CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Surface water quality can deteriorate due to run-off of loose exposed soil and sanitary wastes
from labor force during construction phase.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 226 -
4.2.3.2 OPERATION PHASE
Type of wastewater
Source Treatment Re-use of treated wastewater
Low strength Process Effluent, Washing effluent & Domestic waste water
Treated in Effluent treatment palnt followed by Reverse Osmosis. Domestic waste is treated in ETP at the stage of Biological treatment.
cooling tower make-up & Boiler feed water etc.
High strength Process Effluent, R&D Effluent, Scrubber wastes, LSWW ETP RO(38.25 KLD ) reject & Shipa
Medicare Unit –I effluent.
Treated in Effluent treatment plant followed by MEE.
High strength DM plant/ Softner rejects & Cooling tower bleed off.
Treated in High rate Solids contact clarifier tank (HRSCC).
4.2.4 LAND AND BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
4.2.4.1 CONSTRUCTION PHASE
The proposed project is being setup in KIADB industrial area and therefore major/significant
changes in land use pattern is not anticipated. Also it is existing manufacturing industry & involves
only minor construction activities.
4.2.4.2 OPERATION PHASE
IMPACTS
Discharge of wastewater.
Storage and disposal of solid wastes.
MITIGATION MEASURES
The treated wastewater will be re-used for landscape development, cooling tower make-up water etc.
The domestic solid wastes are segregated at source, collected in bins and composted and inert portion will be handed over to authorized recyclers.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 227 -
4.2.5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
4.2.5.1 OPERATION PHASE
The proposed project will increase the employment potential by creating direct and in-direct
employment opportunities. Preference will be given to the local skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled
workers.
A detailed proposal for the mitigation of all the above stated impacts is detailed in the EMP
(Environmental Management Plan).
4.3 MEASURES FOR MINIMIZING & / OR OFFSETTING ADVERSE IMPACTS IDENTIFIED &
MITIGATION MEASURES – ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)
4.3.1 INTRODUCTION
The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is aimed at mitigating the possible adverse impacts
of a project and ensuring the existing environmental quality. The EMP converses all aspects of
planning, construction and operation of the project relevant to environment. It is essential to
implement the EMP right from the planning stage continuing throughout the construction and
operation stage. Therefore the main purpose of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is
to identify the project specific activities that would have to be considered for significant adverse
impacts and the mitigation measures required.
The construction phase impacts are mostly short term, restricted to the plot area and not
envisaged on a larger scale. In the operational phase the environmental impacts are due to
continuous operation of the project, hence, the emphasis in the Environment Management Plan
(EMP) is to minimize such impacts.
Environmental Management Plan has been discussed in the following sections separately for
construction phase and operational phase.
4.3.2 SCOPE OF EMP
Collection of data on the baseline environmental quality around the proposed industry
including air, water, noise and land environments.
Identification and assessment of potential adverse and beneficial environmental impacts due
to the proposed project.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 228 -
Preparation of an EMP to minimize the adverse impacts.
Preparation of post-project monitoring plan to ensure that the EMP achieves its desired
objectives.
4.3.3 EMP DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE
The proposed project is an expansion proposal and therefore does not involve extensive construction activities. The activities which need to be monitored and managed from the point of view of pollution are detailed in the subsequent sections.
4.3.3.1 AIR ENVIRONMENT
The fugitive dust emissions generated during construction in the beginning followed by
fabrication, erection of plant and machinery during later part of the project are controlled
by carrying out the construction activities in closed manner and by intermittent spraying
of water.
4.3.3.2 NOISE ENVIRONMENT
Construction activity during the phase of setting up of the proposed facility generates
noise which will be due to movement of vehicles carrying construction materials and
operation of machinery.
These activities are limited to construction period and are only temporary phenomena
which shall be managed by properly planning the movement of vehicular traffic, proper
and periodic upkeep of construction equipments, providing noise reduction gadgets,
providing PPE to construction workers to prevent its effect on them.
4.3.3.3 WATER ENVIRONMENT
Water required for construction activity and workers involved in the construction and
fabrication activities are met by KIADB water supply.
The wastewater generated from the construction workers will be treated in the existing
Effluent treatment plant (along with low strength wastewater stream).
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 229 -
4.3.3.4 LAND ENVIRONMENT
The proposed project is being setup in KIADB industrial area and therefore major/significant
changes in land use pattern is not anticipated. Also it is an existing manufacturing industry &
involves only minor construction activities.
4.3.3.5 MANAGEMENT MEASURES FOR FLORA AND FAUNA
FLORA: The proposed project is an expansion proposal of an existing industry and therefore
major impacts on flora are not anticipated. Also the unit is located in a designated industrial area.
Green-belt development is proposed within the project site.
FAUNA: The industry is located in an industrial area and therefore Environmental Management
Plan for fauna is not envisaged.
4.3.3.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
The expansion of Existing Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity industry will benefit the local population as it
creates employment opportunities. The management of the industry proposes to give preference to local people with both direct and indirect employment. 4.3.4 EMP DURING OPERATION PHASE 4.3.4.1 AIR ENVIRONMENT
The process of manufacture of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats
manufacturing industry with R & D activity involves closed operations in various controlled
reactors the handling and operation of such activity invariably generates small quantity of
acid mist and VOCs from the process and other physical operations which would cause
hazardous impact on the environment.
Reactor emissions stem from the following causes:
a) displacement of air containing VOC during reactor charging,
b) solvent evaporation during the reaction cycle (often VOC.s are emitted along with
reaction by-product gases which act as carriers),
c) overhead condenser venting uncondensed VOC during refluxing,
d) purging vaporized VOC remaining from a solvent wash and
e) Opening reactors during a reaction cycle to take samples, determine reaction end-points
etc.,
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 230 -
The process area shall be provided with abundant natural light and ventilation to disperse
the fumes/gases to the outside atmosphere; the roof heights for the process area will be
more so that the fumes emanating from the process do not increase the ground level
concentrations (GLC’S) as it gets dispersed.
Pollutants like SPM, SO2, NOx and CO are envisaged from the proposed project mainly due to
burning of fuel in DGs, boilers. Exhausts from these sources will be emitted from stacks of
adequate height for dispersion of gaseous pollutants.
There is a possibility of plant personnel coming in contact with gaseous fumes and
prolonged exposure to such an environment can adversely affect their health. Therefore,
the management of the industry shall provide the personnel engaged in production
operations with Personal Protective Equipments (PPE) to protect themselves from
possible occupational hazards.
The following table 4.0 presents the EMP for air quality management during operation phase.
Table 4.0 :- Air quality management during operation phase
Environmental impacts Mitigation proposed
Process of manufacture of APIs, intermediates
Particulate and
gaseous emissions
from DG set and
Boiler
Manufacturing process involves closed operations in various controlled reactors.
The process area shall be provided with abundant natural light and ventilation and high roofs to disperse the fumes/gases to the outside atmosphere; preventing the increase of ground level concentrations (GLC’S) as it gets dispersed.
Packed column scrubbers are proposed to neutralize and control dust and fumes from the process section.
The treated waste gases and fumes will be let out through stacks of 5 m height ARL.
The emissions from DG & boiler will be let out through stacks of heights 7 m AGL and 30 m AGL respectively.
Ambient air quality Ambient air quality monitoring as per the prescribed
norms at regular intervals is proposed.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 231 -
4.3.4.2 NOISE ENVIRONMENT
The main sources of noise pollution in the industry are from the operation of machineries
during the manufacturing process, handling and conveying of raw materials and semi-
finished components to different operations.
The conveying system shall be maintained by following routine and periodic maintenance
to reduce noise generation in material handling.
High noise generating units such as DG sets will be provided with acoustic enclosures/silencer.
Green belt at the project boundary will further act as noise barrier and help in attenuation of
noise. The following table 4.1 presents the EMP for noise level.
Table 4.1 :- Noise management during operation phase
Environmental impacts Mitigation proposed
Operation of machineries during the manufacturing process.
Handling and conveying of raw materials and semi-finished components to different operations.
Operation of DG set.
The conveying system shall be maintained by following routine and periodic maintenance to reduce noise generation in material handling.
DG set will be provided with acoustic enclosure. They will be installed in dedicated utility area, where the access will be restricted. Also the use of PPE (ear plugs) will be mandatory in this area.
Green belt at the project boundary will further act as noise barrier and help in attenuation of noise.
4.3.4.3 TRAFFIC DENSITY AND ITS IMPACT Raw materials will be procured from various locations and transported to the factory through lorries. The vehicles will move mainly through State and National highways which are tarred roads. Presently, the traffic on these roads is meager. The additional traffic due to the proposed activity is not likely to affect the environment. 4.3.4.4 WATER CONSUMPTION AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL DETAILS
There are no water bodies nearby hence there is no scope of effluent discharge directly
to water bodies.
The total water demand of 214.6 KLD will be met through KIADB water& Borewell Water
supply.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 232 -
The wastewater generated from the project is about 201.0 KLD is treated in Zero liquid
discharge (ZLD) effluent treatment plant with MEE and RO system.
The Domestic sewage is being mixed with low strength effluent and treated.
The following table 4.2 presents the EMP for water quality.
Table 4.2 :- Water quality management during operation phase
Environmental impacts
Mitigation proposed
(a) Domestic Domestic sewage is being mixed with low strength effluent and treated.
(b) Industrial The industrial effluent is treated in Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) effluent treatment plant with MEE and RO system.
4.3.4.5 LAND ENVIRONMENT
Table 4.3:- land quality management during operation phase
Environmental impacts
Mitigation proposed
(a) Discharge of wastewater.
Domestic sewage is being mixed with low strength effluent and treated.
(b) Storage and disposal of solid wastes.
The total quantity of domestic solid wastes generated which will be segregated at source, collected in bins and composted. The composted waste will be used as manure for landscape development.
The domestic solid waste generated in the premises is estimated to be about 120 kg/day out of
which 72 kg/day (60%) is biodegradable & 48 kg/day (40%) is non-biodegradable/recyclable
wastes. The domestic wastes are segregated at source, collected in bins and composted. The
in-organic solid waste will be sent for recycling.
The various mitigation measures to be adopted during collection and disposal of domestic solid
wastes are as follows:
It is preferable that the container and bins used for collection of waste should be of closed
type so that the waste is not exposed and thus the pos sibility of spreading of disease
through flies and mosquitoes is minimized.
Collection system should be properly supervised so that quick and regular removal of
waste from the dustbin is practiced.
The domestic wastes are segregated at source, collected in bins and composted. The in-
organic solid waste will be sent for recycling.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 233 -
The details of the hazardous waste generated from the various processes are described in detail
earlier in this report. These wastes are stored in hazardous waste storage area and disposed
through TSDF or authorized agencies.
4.3.5 EMP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Phased according to the priority, the implementation schedule is presented in the following table
4.4.
Table 4.4 :- Implementation schedule for EMP
Sl. No. Recommendations Requirement
1 Air pollution control measures Existing
2 Water pollution control
measures
Existing
3 Noise control measures Existing
4 Solid waste management Existing
5 Landscape development Existing
The responsibility of EMP implementation lies with M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., and the
financial allocation/budgetary provisions for environmental management is detailed in table 4.5.
Table 4.5: Financial allocation/budgetary provisions for environmental management Aspects
Sl. No. Description Financial provision in Lakhs/annum
Capital cost Recurring cost
1 Effluent, hazardous waste storage facilities. 30 4
3 ETP & MEE upgradation 200 10
4 Implementation of Air Pollution Control Systems viz. required stack heights for DG set, boiler, and process section, scrubber systems.
30 4
5 Personal protection safety gadgets and health care
07 0.25
6 Tree plantation & landscaping measures 1.0 1.0
7 Environmental Monitoring Plan (air, noise, water and solid waste)
6.0 1.0
TOTAL 274 20.25
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 234 -
4.4 IRREVERSIBLE & IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS
There are no irreversible or irretrievable commitments of the environmental components as
adequate care will be taken to prevent any major impact on the environmental parameters.
4.5 ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS (CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE, ASSIGNING SIGNIFICANCE)
The significance of the impacts identified in the previous sections for various environmental
parameters is detailed in this section.
4.5.1 IMPACT MATRIX
Table 4.8 presents the impact matrix for the actions identified and table 4.6 various
environmental parameters. A rating scale has been devised to give severity of impacts in the
following manner.
A : Strongly beneficial (positive) impact
B : Low beneficial impact
C : Strong adverse (negative) impact
D : Low adverse impact (localized in nature)
- : No conceivable impacts on environment
Table 4.6: Actions likely to affect environment
Sl. no. Actions Envisaged for the following
Construction phase
1 Civil works Existing
2 Fabrication and erection
3 Commissioning
Operational phase
1 Manufacture of Herbal Extract
and Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) &
Intermediates manufacturing
industry with R&D activity
Sources of air pollution Process sections, Boiler, DG sets
Air pollution control units provided
* Packed column scrubbers for process sections with Chimney height of 3 m above RL. * DG set stackt height as per the stack height calculation for 625
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 235 -
&750 KVA is 6 m above RL. * Steam boilers – 6 TPH- 1 No and 10 TPH– 1 no.s - Mechanical dust collectors & Bag Filter with chimney height 32 mt.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 236 -
4.5.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT The environmental impact assessment is detailed in table 4.7
Table 4.7: Environmental impact assessment during Construction phase
Activity & sub
activities
Environmental
impacts on
Mitigation measures Final
Impacts
A. CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Minor
construction,
erection
activities
of the plant,
manpower
requirement.
Air, noise, water,
land, socio
economic &
safety.
Barricading of the site will be done.
Water sprinkling to avoid dust getting air borne.
Asphalted road will be made for the vehicle
movement.
It will be ensured to use well maintained vehicles to
reduce the vehicular air pollution.
Local labor will be employed.
Proper sanitation facility will be provided.
Construction material will be handled with due care to
avoid any spillage.
Fuel to be used will be stored on impervious surface to
prevent the soil contamination in case of spillage &
leakage.
Any hazardous waste generation will be handled as per
the Environmental Management Plan.
Low impacts due to
temporary activities.
Beneficial impacts due
to employment generation.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 237 -
Table 4.7.1: Environmental impact assessment during operation phase
Sl. no.
Environmental components
Predicted impacts
Probable source of impact Mitigation measures Remarks
1 Ambient air quality
Minor negative impact.
Process of manufacture of APIs & Intermediates
Particulate and gaseous emissions from DG set and boilers & Thermic Fluid heater
Manufacturing process involves closed operations in various controlled reactors.
The process area will be provided with abundant natural light and ventilation and high roofs to disperse the fumes/gases to the outside atmosphere; preventing the increase of ground level concentrations (GLC’S) as it gets dispersed.
Packed column scrubbers are proposed to neutralize and control dust and fumes from the process section.
The treated waste gases and fumes will be let out through stacks of 5 m height ARL.
The emissions from DG & boiler will be let out through stacks of heights 3 m ARL and 32 m AGL respectively.
DG sets will be used only during power failure.
2 Noise Minor negative impact near noise generation sources inside the premises.
Operation of machineries during the manufacturing process.
The conveying system shall be maintained by following routine and periodic maintenance to reduce noise generation in material handling.
-
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 238 -
Handling and conveying of raw materials and semi-finished components to different areas of operations
Operation of DG set.
DG set with prebuilt acoustic enclosure as per CPCB norms will be installed in dedicated utility area, where the access will be restricted. Also the use of PPE (ear plugs) will be mandatory in this area.
Green belt at the project boundary will further act as noise barrier and help in attenuation of noise.
3 Water quality No significant adverse impact
Discharge of domestic sewage and industrial effluent
Domestic sewage will be mixed with low strength wastewater stream & re-used for cooling tower make-up water etc.
The effluent generated from the industry will be treated in ETP followed by RO & MEE.
Water conservation measures will be encouraged.
4 Land No negative impact
Discharge of wastewater.
Storage and disposal of solid wastes.
The treated wastewater will be re-used for cooling tower make-up water etc.
The domestic solid wastes are segregated at source, collected in bins and composted and inert portion will be handed over to authorized recyclers.
-
5 Socio-economic Overall positive impact
Employment opportunities
Locally available man power will be utilized to the maximum possible extent.
-
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 239 -
Table 4.8:- Impact matrix Sl. no Environmental parameter Proposed actions
Excavation Civil works Fabrication /Erection Operation phase
1.0 Air environment
Ambient air quality
Suspended particulates C C - D
Sulfur dioxide - - - D
Nitrogen oxides - - - D
Carbon monoxides - - - D
2.0 Water environment
Ground water quality/availability - - - -
Surface water availability - - - -
Receiving water body quality - - - -
Drainage system - - - -
3.0 Solid & hazardous waste
Land disposal - C - C
4.0 Noise
Ambient noise levels C C C C
5.0 Ecological parameters
Flora - - - -
Fauna - - - -
Aquatic ecology - - - -
6.0 Human settlement
Economic output - B B A
Employment opportunity - A A A
Occupational health - D D C
Infrastructure - C C B
7.0 Aesthetics
Topography / skyline - - - C
Visual air quality C C - C
Visual water quality - - - -
A:Strongly beneficial (positive) impact, B: Low beneficial impact, C:Low adverse impact (localized in nature), D:Strong adverse (negative) impact -:No conceivable impacts on environment
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 240 -
CHAPTER 5
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (TECHNOLOGY & SITE)
5.1 ALTERNATIVES FOR TECHNOLOGY
5.1.1 EMISSION CONTROL TECHNIQUES
No single emission control technique can be used for all equipment leaks. The techniques
used to control emissions from equipment leaks can be separated into two categories:
equipment practices and work practices.
1) EQUIPMENT PRACTICES
Equipment practices involve the use of equipment to reduce or eliminate emissions. A
common example is an add-on control device, such as an adsorption, that is used to
reduce organic emissions from a process vent.
Other equipment controls include 1) leakless technology for valves and pumps; 2) plugs,
caps, and blinds for open-ended lines; 3) rupture discs and soft seats (Orings) for pressure
relief valves (PRVs); 4) dual mechanical seals with non-VOC barrier fluid/degassing vent
systems for rotary equipment; 5) closed-loop sampling systems; and 6) enclosure of seal
area/vent to a combustion control device for dynamic seals.
These equipment controls generally can attain up to 100 percent reduction of VOC
emissions. Mechanical seals and techniques that rely upon combustion control have been
assigned an overall control efficiency of 95 percent, which is consistent with the
efficiencies assigned to other frequently applied recovery techniques.
2) WORK PRACTICES
Work practices refer to the plans and procedures undertaken to reduce or estimate
emissions. Work practices with Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are the most
commonly used control techniques for equipment leaks. The primary work practice
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 241 -
applied to pressure relief valves, other valves, pumps and other sources is leak detection
and repair (LDAR) of sources
The emissions reduction potential for LDAR is highly variable and depends upon several
factors, including the frequency of monitoring (surveying) sources for leaks and the
threshold definition of a leak. A quarterly monitoring plan is generally more effective than
a half yearly monitoring plan in reducing emissions, since leaks are found and corrected
more quickly. Similarly, a maintenance system that corrects smaller leaks usually is more
effective than a system that responds only to larger leaks.
Characteristics of individual sources can affect the emissions reduction achieved by LDAR.
Important characteristics include leak occurrence rate, leak recurrence rate, accessibility
of leaking equipment and repair effectiveness.
5.1.2 OXIDES OF NITROGEN EMISSIONS FROM BOILER
LOW NITROGEN FUEL OIL
When firing fuel oils, NOx formed by fuel bound nitrogen can account for 20-50% of the
total NOx level. Utilizing fuel oils with lower nitrogen contents results in lower NOx levels.
One method to reduce NOx levels from boilers firing distillate oils is through the use of
low nitrogen fuel oil. Low nitrogen oils can contain up to 15-20 times less fuel-bound
nitrogen than standard No. 2 oil (less than 0.001% fuel-bound nitrogen). When low NOx
oil is fired in fire-tube boilers utilizing flue gas recirculation, NOx reductions of 60%-70%
over NOx emissions from standard No. 2 oils have been achieved.
BURNER MODIFICATIONS
Burner modifications for NOx control involve changing the design of a standard burner in
order to create a larger flame. Enlarging the flame results in lower flame temperatures
and lower thermal NOx formation which, in turn, results in lower overall NOx emissions.
The technology can be applied to most boiler types and sizes. It is most effective when
firing natural gas and distillate fuel oil and has little affect on boilers firing heavy oil. To
comply with the more stringent regulations, burner modifications must be used in
conjunction with other NOx reduction methods, such as flue gas recirculation. If burner
modifications are utilized exclusively to achieve low NOx levels (30 ppm), adverse affects
on boiler operating parameters such as turndown, capacity, CO levels and efficiency may
result. It is important to address all aspects of NOx control when selecting NOx control
technologies.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 242 -
FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION
Flue gas recirculation, or FGR, is the most effective method of reducing NOx emission from
industrial boilers with inputs below 100 MMBtu/hr. FGR entails re-circulating a portion of
relatively cool exhaust gases back into the combustion zone in order to lower the flame
temperature and reduce NOx formation. It is currently the most effective and popular low
NOx technology for firetube and watertube boilers. And, in many applications, it does not
require any additional reduction equipment to comply with the most stringent
regulations. Flue gas recirculation technology can be classified into two types; external or
induced.
External flue gas recirculation utilizes an external fan to re-circulate the flue gases back
into the combustion zone. External piping routes the exhaust gases from the stack to the
burner. A valve controls the recirculation rate, based on boiler input.
Induced flue gas recirculation utilizes the combustion air fan to re-circulate the flue gases
back into the combustion zone. A portion of the flue gases are routed by duct work or
internally to the combustion air fan, where they are premixed with the combustion air
and introduced into the flame through the burner.
New designs of induced FGR that utilize an integral FGR design are becoming popular
among boiler owners and operators because of their uncomplicated design and reliability.
Theoretically, there is no limit to the amount of NOx reduction with FGR; practically, there
is a physical, feasible limit. The limit of NOx reduction varies for different fuels - 80% for
natural gas and 20-25% for standard fuel oils.
The current trends with low NOx technologies are to design the boiler and low NOx
equipment as a package. Designing as a true package allows the NOx control technology
to be specifically tailored to match the boiler’s furnace design features, such as shape,
volume, and heat release. By designing the low NOx technology as a package with the
boiler, the effects of the low NOx technology on boiler operating parameters (turndown,
capacity, efficiency, and CO levels) can be addressed and minimized.
CHOOSING THE BEST NOX TECHNOLOGY FOR THE JOB
Certain NOx controls can worsen boiler performance while other controls can appreciably
improve performance. Aspects of the boiler performance that could be affected include
turndown, capacity, efficiency, excess air, and CO emissions. Failure to take into account
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 243 -
all of the boiler operating parameters can lead to increased operating and maintenance
costs, loss of efficiency, elevated CO levels, and shortening of the boiler’s life.
5.2 ALTERNATIVES FOR SITE
The proposed project is an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats
manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry. Hence no alternative
sites are considered.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 244 -
CHAPTER 6
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
6.1 TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MITIGATION
MEASURES (INCLUDING MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGIES, FREQUENCY, LOCATION,
DATA ANALYSIS, REPORTING SCHEDULES, EMERGENCY PROCEDURES, DETAILED
BUDGET & PROCUREMENT SCHEDULES)
6.1.1 MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY
Ambient air & noise monitoring, water, wastewater & soil quality: outsourced to NABEL
accredited laboratory.
6.1.2 FREQUENCY, LOCATION, DATA ANALYSIS, REPORTING SCHEDULES
A comprehensive monitoring program is suggested in below table 6.1.
Table 6.1: Monitoring schedule for environmental parameters
Sl. No
Particulars
Monitoring frequency
Duration of monitoring
Important parameters for monitoring
I Air quality
a Ambient air monitoring
1. Project premises Once in a month 24 hourly sample RSPM, SPM, SO2, NOx
2. Stack monitoring Once in a month Grab SPM, SO2, NOx, HC, CO
II Water and wastewater quality
b Water quality
i. Groundwater at two locations (up-gradient and down-gradient)
Once in a month Grab As per KSPCB requirements
c Wastewater quality
i. Low strength & high strength wastewater streams (raw & treated)
Once in a month Grab As per KSPCB requirements
III Soil quality
1. Within project premises at 1 location
Once in a year Composite sample
As per KSPCB requirements
2. Ecological preservation and up-gradation
Seasonal Visual observations
Survival rate
IV Noise monitoring
1. Project premises Once in a year Day and night As per KSPCB requirements
V Hazardous waste monitoring
1. Hazardous waste characterization
Annually Day and night As per KSPCB requirements
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 245 -
6.1.3 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES
STRUCTURE OF ONSITE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE
Plant Level Worker noticing an emergency situation
Shift In-charge
1. If necessary, shutdown the plant. 2. Contact the emergency declarer
If emergency is off site contact concerned authority and handover the charge of emergency control operations.
Govt. Authorities
Police
Fire
Accounting of personnel
All clear signal (when emergency is over)
Incident/Emergency controller
Fire/Security Team
Rescue/First Aid Team
Declarer of emergency
Raise alarm
Inform over phone
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 246 -
EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
SITE CONTROLLER & CHIEF EMERGENCY DECLARER
(GENERAL MANAGER/PRODUCTION MANAGER)
INCIDENT CONTROLLER/ALTERNATIVE EMERGENCY DECLARER
(ADMINISTRATOR)
MAINTENANCE SUPERVISORS / INCIDENT EMERGENCY
DECLARER/CONTROLLER
MAINTENANCE SUPERVISORS /
ALTERNATIVE EMERGENCY DECLARER
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 247 -
EMERGENCY COORDINATES
6.1.4 DETAILED BUDGET & PROCUREMENT SCHEDULES
Detailed budgetary provisions for monitoring program is detailed in the following table
6.2.
Table 6.2: Financial allocation/budgetary provisions for monitoring program
Sl. No. Description Financial provision in Lakhs/annum
Capital cost Recurring cost
1 Effluent, hazardous waste storage facilities. 30 4
3 ETP & MEE upgradation 200 10
4 Implementation of Air Pollution Control Systems viz. required stack heights for DG set, boiler, and process
section, scrubber systems.
30 4
5 Personal protection safety gadgets and health care 07 0.25
6 Tree plantation & landscaping measures 1.0 1.0
7 Environmental Monitoring Plan (air, noise, water and solid waste)
6.0 1.0
TOTAL 274 20.25
CONCERNED DEPARTMENTS
SECURITY
PERSONNEL
ESSENTIAL & SUPPORT SERVICES
FIRE FIGHTING RESCUE REHABILITATION & TRANSPORT
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 248 -
CHAPTER 7
ADDITIONAL STUDIES
7.1 INTRODUCTION
The Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with
R & D activity industries are generally associated with use of raw materials and chemicals
which are hazardous in nature. The process activities of these industries are also
associated with certain risks. Therefore Hazop analysis and risk assessment are addressed
in detail as additional studies.
Apart from the above studies air pollution dispersion modeling using US EPA approved
AERMOD software has been used to predict the profile of dispersion and associated
impacts within the project study area.
7.2 HAZOP ANALYSIS
Detailed step-wise hazop analysis studies describing process, operation, possible hazard
failure and remedial actions for each of the product manufactured is given in
annexure- 1
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 249 -
7.3 SAFETY PRECAUTIONS FOR THE HANDLING OF HYDROGEN GAS AND PD/CARBON
The following are the safety precautions adopted while handling hydrogen gas &
palladium carbon.
1. It is ensured that all the equipments have earthing and bondings.
2. It is ensured that the mechanical seal pressure is +2.0 kg/cm2 with operating pressure.
3. Care is taken to see that there are no leackages in the mechanical seal.
4. Cleanliness of autoclave reactor and it is surroundings is maintained.
5. Before charging pressure test of autoclave is taken; only if it is ok proceed further
otherwise leak should be rectified.
6. Hydrogen lines and availability of required cylinders near header is ensured.
7. All the cylinders are tied with chain and it is ensured that there are no leackages in
the manifold.
8. All the gauges are calibrated.
9. Presence of water in autoclave vent receiver is ensured.
10. Availability of suitable rupture disc & its connection to the dump vessel is ensured.
11. Use the necessary PPE’s before batch charging i.e., 3M cartridge mask, safety goggles,
safety helmets, safety shoes & safety gloves.
12. Availability of fire fighting equipments nearby is ensured.
13. ERT (Emergency Response Team) is available in case of emergency.
14. Hydrogen Gas detector is on.
15. 50% Pd/C making slurry with suitable solvent under nitrogen blanketing with proper
earthing by holding the vacuum into the receiver.
16. Vacuum is released with nitrogen pressure only through vent line.
17. Hydrogen gas 0.2 kg/cm2 is slowly applied and flushed out. The process is repeated
once again.
18. Hydrogen gas 4.0-4.5 kg/cm2 is slowly applied and pressure is maintained as per BPR.
19. All necessary PPE’s i.e., 3M cartridge mask, safety goggles, safety helmets, safety
shoes & safety gloves are used during filtration.
20. Nitrogen blanketing in the nutch filter is added and slowly filtration into the nutch
filter is started.
21. Main filtration is completed and the spent Pd/C cake is washed with suitable solvent
under nitrogen blanketing until absence of the product.
22. Water and HCl are charged into the reactor for decomposing of left over traces of
spent Pd/C; the mass is unloaded and transferred to EHS department for further
disposal.
23. Wet spent Pd/C is unloaded from Nutsche filter and packed under nitrogen blanketing
& transferred to WH for recovery.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 250 -
7.4 RISK ASSESSMENT
7.4.1 BACKGROUND
The manufacture of an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) and Intermediates with
R&D Activity by “ M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited.,” involves use and storage of certain
solvents which may cause hazards/risks in case of accidental spill/leakage. Also the
operation of DGs, boilers requires the use and storage of diesel and fuel oil which can be
a source of hazard in case of accidental spill/leakage. Therefore a methodology has to be
developed for identifying and evaluating the potential risks and preparation of
intervention plans to reduce and prevent the associated risks.
The above factors have necessitated preparation of risk assessment report for
“M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited.,”
7.4.2 INTRODUCTION
Environmental risk analysis deals with the identification and quantification of risks the
equipment and personnel are exposed to, from the hazards present in the area.
Risk analysis follows hazard analysis (Risk = Hazard x Probability of occurrence). It involves
identification and assessment of risks to the plant personnel and neighboring populations.
This requires a thorough knowledge of failure probability, credible accident scenario,
vulnerability of population etc. Much of this information is difficult to procure.
Consequently, the risk analysis is confined to maximum credible accident studies. The
subsequent sections shall address the identification of various hazards and risks in the
operations, which will give a broad identification of risks involved.
7.4.3 OBJECTIVE & SCOPE
The objective of the study is to carry out risk analysis and prepare disaster management
plan/emergency preparedness plans.
The risk analysis/assessment study covers the following:
(a) Identification of potential hazards associated with the solvent storage and their
usage.
(b) Identification of potential hazard due fuel storage.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 251 -
(c) Assess the overall damage potential of the identified hazardous events and impact
zones from the accident scenarios.
(d) Suggestions and recommendations on the minimization of the accident
possibilities.
7.4.4 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
The technique used for the hazard identification is Maximum Credible Accident (MCA)
analysis, which allows identification of an accident with probable maximum damage
distance.
Apart from the solvents, diesel fuel and fuel oil will also be stored in plant premises. The
solvent storage tanks are designed as per the safety norms of Hazardous Storage
Guidelines of Institute of Fire and Safety Engineering, Nagpur. Apart from the tanks small
quantities of solvents are stored in flame proof barrels in the designated storage area.
Storage tank sizes and quantity of solvent is planned as per the storage capacity of
respective solvents. The solvent and fuel requirement for the industry/plant on monthly
basis is detailed table 7.1 & Probable hazards in the plant is shown in table 7.2.
Table 7.1: Product wise solvents recovered in Kg
Sl. No
Product Raw materials Quantity (kg/annum)
Recovered and recycled
Lost
A Herbal Extract
1 Coleus Forskholli extract
Toluene 3,49,200 10800
Hexane 34,200 1800
2 Curcumin Ethyl Acetate 19,350 900
3 TetrahydroCurcuminoids
Acetone 47400 2400
IPA 14250 750
4 Piperine Methanol 5616 624
5 Tetrahydropiperine Acetone 13446 698
IPA 4084 199
B Cosmetics ingredients, neutraceutical ingredients, pharama intermediates and API
1 Benzal Koniumchloride
---
2 4-nhexylresercinol Methanol 28500 1500
Hexane 28500 1500
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 252 -
3 4-n Butylresercinol Methanol 21243 1002
Hexane 21042 1203
4 2- Methylresercinol Mesitylene 13496 698
5 1,4 cyclohexanedione
Methanol 41040 2160
Ethyl acetate 95400 4800
6 Tasmsulosin HCL and its itermediates
Isopropyl alchol 4770 241
Ethyl acetate 6693 321
Methanol 5299 279
7 1-chloromethyl Naphthalene
----
8 Piroctone Olamine Methanol 85560 4440
Ethyl Acetate 146400 7200
EDC 85800 4200
9 Ethylhexyl Trizone Acetonitrile 34800 1200
Methanol 40500 2100
Hexane 32400 1800
Perchloroethylene 53400 3300
Xylene 22800 1200
10 Benzethonium Chloride
Ethyl Acetate 26653 1403
Toulene 52405 1102
11 Iscotrizinol Acetonitrile 4910 201
Hexane 10321 501
Methanol 8016 401
Toulene 23347 902
12 Tinosorb- S Hexane 1046 50
Ethylene Dichloride 6872 359
Isopropyl alcohol 9711 548
Methanol 797 50
Toulene 16932 897
13 Tinosorb -M Methanol 5677 299
Isopropyl alcohol 947 50
Methanol 15139 797
Toulene 7121 349
Xylene 4831 249
Table 7.2: Probable hazards in the plant
Hazard type Description
Solvent use Spillage of chemicals while handling.
Spillage of chemicals or baths into trench.
Fuel storage Diesel and furnace oil spill and fire.
Tank failure and fire.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 253 -
The drawing indicating the areas earmarked for storage of solvents and fuel is shown in
the appended plant layout of the industry.
7.4.4.1 EXPOSURE TO SOLVENTS
As per the Manufacture, Storage and Import of APIs are hazardous in nature according to
Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical (Amendment) 1989 (as
amended on 24-9-2008), Schedule-1, these solvents possess risk to the health and safety
and the user must be aware of the safe handling procedures, health risk involved and
safety arrangements.
Severity mapping for the various solvents used is detailed in the tables 7.3 below.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
- 254 -
Table 7.3: Severity mapping FIRE
Sl.
No.
Solvent Severity Precautionary measures proposed Mitigation measures
proposed Less severe Moderate Severe
FIRE
1 Cyclohexane - Flammable - Storage: Non-corrosive in the presence of
glass & metals.
Stored in segregated and approved area. Kept
in cool, well-ventilated areas in tightly closed
and sealed containers. All possible sources of
ignition should be avoided.
Stability and reactivity: Reactive with
oxidizing agents.
Fire fighting measures:
Small fire: dry chemical
powder to be used.
Large fire: Water spray or fog
to be used.
2 Methyl alcohol
- - Highly
flammable
Storage: Stored in tightly closed containers in
a cool, dry, well-ventilated areas away from
direct sunlight and any area where the fire
hazard may be acute.
Separate from oxidizing materials.
Storage and use should be no smoking areas.
Stability and reactivity: Stable under ordinary
conditions of use and storage. Heat
contributes to instability.
May produce acrid smoke and irritating fumes
when heated to decomposition.
Incompatible with strong oxidizers.
Fire fighting measures:
Methanol burns with a clean
clear flame that is almost
invisible in daylight. Fine
water spray or fog to be used
to control fire spread and cool
adjacent structures and
containers.
Fire fighters must wear full
face positive pressure, self-
contained breathing
apparatus or airline
appropriate protective
clothing.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 255 -
3 Toluene - Flammable - Storage: Stored in a segregated and approved
area in a cool well-ventilated area in tightly
closed and sealed containers away from all
possible sources of ignition.
Stability and reactivity: Stable under normal
conditions. Can become instable when
exposed to conditions of heat and ignition
sources.
Incompatible with strong oxidizers, silver
perchlorate, sodium difluoride,
tetranitromethane, uranium hexafluoride.
Frozen bromine trifluoride reacts violently
with toluene at – 800C
Reactive with oxidizing agents.
Reacts chemically with nitrogen oxides or
halogens to form nitrotoulene, nitrobenzene
and nitrophenol and halogenated products
respectively.
Toluene forms explosive reaction with 1,3-
dichloro-5,5-dimethyl-2,4-imidazolididione,
dinitrogen tetrachloride.
Non-corrosive in the presence of glass.
Fire fighting measures: Dry
chemical powder, water spray
or fog can be used as fire
extinguishing media.
4 Diesel - - Highly
flammable
Storage: Should be kept away from flame,
sparks, excessive temperatures and open
flame.
Incompatibility: High temperatures, open
flames, sparks, welding, smoking and other
Fire fighting measures: Water
spray, fog or fire fighting
foam. Water may be
ineffective for fighting the
fire, but may be used to cool
fire-exposed containers.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 256 -
ignition sources. Should be kept away from
strong oxidizers.
Carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and non-
combusted hydrocarbons (smoke) are the
hazardous decomposition products that may
be formed.
SPILLAGES
Sl.
No.
Raw material Severity Precautionary measures
proposed
Mitigation measures proposed
Less
severe
Moderate Severe
SPILLAGES
1 Cyclohexane - Moderately
toxic
- EXPOSURE CONTROLS AND
PERSONNEL PROTECTION:
Engineering controls: Exhaust
ventilation or other engineering
controls to be provided to keep
the air-borne concentrations
below the threshold limit.
Eyewash stations & safety
showers should be proximal to
the work-station location.
Personal protection: Splash
goggles, lab coat, vapor
respirator, gloves, safety goggles
or glasses, boots etc. to be
provided.
FIRST AID MEASURES:
After inhalation: Removed to fresh air. If not breathing,
artificial respiration to be given. If breathing is difficult,
oxygen to be given. Medical attention to be sought
immediately.
After skin contact: Remove contaminated clothing and wash
affected areas with plenty of water. Cover irritated skin with
emollient. Seek medical attention.
After eye contact: Remove contact lenses if any. Flush eyes
immediately with water for at least 15 minutes keeping
eyelids open. Get medical attention immediately.
After ingestion: DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING unless directed
to do so by medical personnel. Never give anything by mouth
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 257 -
to an unconscious person. Aspiration hazard if swallowed –
can enter lungs & cause damage. Loosen tight clothing such
as collar, tie, belt or waist-band. Get medical attention if
symptoms appear.
Methyl alcohol
Less
toxic
- - EXPOSURE CONTROLS AND
PERSONNEL PROTECTION:
Engineering controls: In confined
areas, local and general
ventilation should be provided,
ventilation systems designed
according to approved
engineering standards.
Respiratory protection: NIOSH
approved supplied air respirator
when air-borne concentrations
exceed exposure limits.
Eye and face protection: Face
shield and chemical splash
goggles when transferring is
taking place.
FIRST AID MEASURES:
After inhalation: Remove to fresh air. Restore or assist
breathing if necessary. Obtain medical attention.
After skin contact: Remove contaminated clothing. Wash skin
with soap and water for at least 15 min. Seek medical
attention if irritation develops or persists. Wash clothing
before re-use.
After eye contact: Remove contact lenses if worn. Flush eyes
immediately with plenty of running water for at least 15
minutes lifting lower and upper eyelids occasionally. Get
medical attention.
After ingestion: Swallowing methanol is potentially life
threatening. On-set of symptoms may be delayed for 18-24
hours after digestion. If conscious and medical aid is not
immediately available do not induce vomiting. Transport to
medical facility immediately.
2 Toluene - Moderately
toxic
- EXPOSURE CONTROLS AND
PERSONNEL PROTECTION:
Engineering controls: Exhaust
ventilation should be provided.
FIRST AID MEASURES:
After inhalation: Remove to fresh air. If breathing stops
provide artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult oxygen
should be administered. Get medical attention.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 258 -
Personnel protection: Splash
goggles, lab coat, vapor
respirator, gloves.
Personnel protection in case of
large spill: Splash goggles, full
suit, vapor respirator, boots,
gloves, self-contained breathing
apparatus.
After skin contact: Wash with a disinfectant soap and cover
contaminated skin with an anti-bacterial cream. Seek
immediate medical attention
After eye contact: Remove contact lenses. Immediately flush
eyes with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes. Obtain
medical attention.
After ingestion: DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING unless directed
to do so by medical personnel. Never give anything by mouth
to an unconscious person. Loosen tight clothing such as
collar, tie, belt or waist-band.
3 Diesel - Moderately
toxic
- To be handled carefully with the
usual precautionary measures.
The product should not be
allowed to reach the
groundwater, water bodies or
sewerage system in large
quantities.
Runoff to sewer may cause fire or
explosion hazard.
FIRST AID MEASURES:
Eye & Skin: In case of contact, eyes are immediately flushed
with clean, low-pressure water for at least 15 min. Eyelids are
held open to ensure adequate flushing. Medical attention is
obtained if irritation or redness develops in skin.
Ingestion: VOMITING SHOULD NOT BE INDUCED. Liquids
should not be given.
Inhalation: The person should be removed to fresh air. If
person is not breathing artificial respiration to be provided. If
necessary, additional oxygen to be provided once breathing
is restored if trained to do so. Medical attention to be sought
immediately.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 259 -
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 260 -
7.4.4.5.1 Fire & Explosing Index
Fire and Explosion Index FIRE AND EXPLOSION INDEX 40.46
User entries should only be made in the yellow cells. Notes are attached to most entry cells. If you need further details. - read the manual
Instructions for user - read comments attached to this cell
Level 2 Risk Analysis is not triggered
Pertinent Process Unit HYDROGENATION
Material in Process Unit HYDROGENATION
Material Factor (see Material Data tab) 21 21.00
NFPA Health rating (Nh) - see Material Data 0
NFPA Flammability rating (Nf) - see Material Data 4
NFPA Instability rating (Ni) - see Material Data 0
1 General Process Hazards
Calculated Penalties
Base 1.00 REMARKS
1A Exothermic Reaction (input range 0.0 - 1.25) 0.3 0.30
1B Endothermic Reaction (input range 0.0 - 0.4) 0 0.00
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 261 -
1C Material Handling and Transfer (input range 0.0 - 0.8) 0 0.00
1D
Enclosed or Indoor Process or storage Units handling Flammable materials (input range 0.0 - 0.9) 0 0.00
1E Ease of Access for Emergency Responders (input range 0.0 - 0.35) 0.2 0.20
1F Drainage and Spill Control (input range 0.0 - 0.5) 0.1 0.10
General Process Hazards Factor F1 1.60
2 Special Process Hazards
Base 1.00
2a Toxicity of the material handled (Entry is automatic). 0 0.00
2B Process or Storage operates at vacuum (<500mmHg) -(input 0.5 0 0.00
2C Operation in or near the flammable range (input range 0.0 - 0.8) 0 0.00
2D Dust Explosion (input range 0.0 - 2.0) 0 0.00
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 262 -
2E Pressure Penalty
Operating Pressure (fig 2) Kpa g 60
Relief Pressure Setting Kpa g 90
Penalty
Viscous non volatile materials multiplier input 0.7 0
Flammable Liquids at Press > 1 barg multiplier input 1.2 0
LPG or Flammable Gas multiplier input 1.3 0
None of the above - multiplier 1.0 0
Final Penalty 0 0.00
2F Low Temperature Operation 0 0.00
2G Combustible and Flammable materials in Process
2G1 Liquids or Gases in Process
Q Process Kg
Hc Kcal/Kg (see Material data)
Penalty 0.00
2G2 Liquids or gases in Storage
Liquefied Flammable Gases
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 263 -
Q Storage kg 0
Hc Kcal/Kg (see Material data) 0
Class 1 Flammable Liquids (FP<37.8 C) in
Q Storage Kg 0
Hc Kcal/Kg (see Material data) 0
Class 2 Flammable Liquids (37.8<FP<60 C)
Q Storage Kg 0
Hc Kcal/Kg (see Material data) 0
Penalty 0.00
2G3 Solids in Storage or Process
Quantity in Kg - Combustible Solids in Storage , Dust in Process Bulk Density <160Kg/m3 0
Quantity in kg - Combustible Solids in Storage , Dust in Process Bulk Density >160Kg/m3 0
Penalty 0.00
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 264 -
2H Corrosion and Erosion (input range 0.0 -0.75) 0.1 0.10
2I Leakage, Joints, packing, flexible joints 0.1 0.10
2J Use of Fired Equipment (fig 6)
Distance of ignition source from potential leak
If there is a strong source of ignition (open flame) within 100 metres enter in one of the columns below
Distance in metres (for Material >F.P.) 500
Distance in metres (for Material >B.P.) 500
Penalty 0.00
2K Hot Oil Heat Exchange Equipment (table 5)
Quantity in pumps and pipes > F.P is between 100 and 20000 litres input 0.15 0
Quantity in pumps and pipes > F.P is between 20000 and 40000 litres input 0.3 0
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 265 -
Quantity in pumps and pipes > F.P is between 40000 and 100000 litres input 0.5 0
Quantity in pumps and pipes > F.P is >100000 litres input 0.75 0
Quantity in pumps and pipes > B.P is between 100 and 20000 litres input 0.25 0
Quantity in pumps and pipes > B.P is between 20000 and 40000 litres input 0.45 0
Quantity in pumps and pipes > B.P is between 40000 and 100000 litres input 0.75 0
Quantity in pumps and pipes > B.P is >100000 litres input 1.15 0
Penalty 0.00
2L Rotating Equipment
Unit includes Compressor in excess of 500KW or pump in excess of 80KW or Safety Critical Agitator, input 0.5 0
Penalty 0.00
Special Process Hazards Factor f2 1.20
F1 X F2 1.93
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 266 -
Fire and Explosion Index 40.46
Print section follows:
HYDROGENATION
Fire and Explosion Index 40.46
Material Factor (see Material Data tab) 21.00
NFPA Health rating (Nh) 0
NFPA Flammability rating (Nf) 4
NFPA Instability rating (Ni) 0
General Process Hazards
Base 1
1A Exothermic Reaction (range of input 0.3 - 1.25) 0.30
1B Endothermic Reaction (input range 0.2 - 0.4) 0.00
1C Material Handling and Transfer (input range 0.25 - 0.8) 0.00
1D Enclosed or Indoor Process or storage Units handling Flammable materials 0.00
1E Ease of Access for Emergency Responders 0.20
1F Drainage and Spill Control 0.10 General Process Hazards Factor 1.60
Base 1 2A Toxicity of the material handled. 0.00
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 267 -
2B Process or Storage operates at vacuum (<500mmHg) -penalty 0.5 0.00
2C Operation in or near the flammable range (input range 0.0 - 0.8) 0.00
2D Dust Explosion (input range 0.0 - 2.0) 0.00 2E Pressure Penalty 0.00 2F Low Temperature Operation 0.00
2G1 Combustible and Flammable materials in Process 0.00
2G2 Liquids or gases in Storage 0.00 2G3 Solids in Storage or Process 0.00
2H Corrosion and Erosion (input range 0.0 -0.75) 0.10
2I Leakage, Joints, packing, flexible joints 0.10 2J Use of Fired Equipment (fig 6) 0.00
2K Hot Oil Heat Exchange Equipment (table 5) 0.00
2L Rotating Equipment 0.00
Special Process Hazards Factor 1.20
Fire and Explosion Index 40.46
Level 2 Risk Analysis is not triggered
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 268 -
7.4.5 FIRE HAZARDS
7.4.5.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE FIRE & EXPLOSION INDEX (F & EI)
The Fire and Explosion Risk Analysis System is a step-by-step objective evaluation of the
realistic fire, explosion and reactivity potential of process equipment and its contents. The
quantitative measurements used in the analysis are based on historic loss data, the energy
potential of the material under study, and the extent to which loss prevention practices are
currently applied.
The purpose of the F&EI system is to:
1. QUANTIFY the expected damage of potential fire, explosion and reactivity
incidents in realistic terms.
2. IDENTIFY equipment that would be likely to contribute to the creation or
escalation of an incident.
3. COMMUNICATE the F&EI risk potential to management.
The most important goal of the F&EI System is to make the engineer aware of the loss
potential of each process area and to help the engineer identify ways to lessen the severity
and resultant rupee loss of potential incidents in an efficient and cost effective manner.
The F&EI is used in the Dow Risk Review Process. Determination of the F&EI is done in
conducting a Process Hazard Analysis or Level I Risk Review.
The Dow F&EI system attempts to determine the realistic maximum loss that can occur to a
process plant (or process unit) or related facility - a loss that could actually be experienced
under the most adverse operating conditions. The calculation is based on quantifiable data.
Finite spill rates, process temperature in relation to material flash points and boiling points
and reactivity are just a few of the many contributors to a probable incident.
The system can be applied if handling a minimum of approximately 454 kg of a flammable or
reactive material.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 269 -
7.4.5.2 PROCEDURE FOR RISK ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS
7.4.5.3 IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS
A. The Fire and Explosion Index system assumes that a process unit handles a minimum of
2268 kg, or about 2.27 m3 of a flammable, combustible or reactive material. If less material
is involved, generally the risk will be overstated. However, F&EI calculations can provide
meaningful results for pilot plants if they handle at least 454 kg or about 0.454 m3 of
combustible or reactive material.
B. Careful consideration is needed when equipment is arranged in series and the items are
not effectively isolated from each other.
Selection of pertinent process unit
Determination of Material Factor
Calculation of General Process Hazards
Factor (F1)
Calculation of Special Process Hazards
Factor (F2)
Determination of Process Unit Hazards Factor
F3 = F1 x F2
Determination of F&EI F&EI = F3 x Material Factor
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 270 -
7.4.5.4 CALCULATION OF F & EI FOR THE STORAGE AREA OF M/S. SHILPA MEDICARE
LIMITED.,
The warehouse/storage area is considered for the calculation of the fire & explosion index.
The solvents & fuels are stored in large quantities in the factory premises. The calculation of
F & EI is shown in the following stages.
Step 1: Determination of material factors (MF)
Step 2: Determination of general process hazards factor (F1)
Step 3: Determination of special process hazards factor (F2)
Step 4: Determination of process unit hazard factor (F3)
F3 = F1 x F2
Step 5: Determination of Fire & Explosion Index (F & EI)
F & EI = F3 x material factor (MF)
Step 6: Determination of degree of hazard potential
The degree of hazard potential is identified based on the numerical value of F&EI as per the
criteria given in the following table 7.4.
Table 7.4: Degree of hazard
F&EI range Degree of hazard
1 - 60 Light
61 - 96 Moderate
97 - 127 Intermediate
128 - 158 Heavy
159 - up Severe
Following table 7.5 provides the details of the identified potential hazards and the systems
suggested to minimize the hazards in the industry.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 271 -
Table 7.5: Preventive systems provided in the plant
Unit Hazard identified Provision
Solvent use and
mixing
Spill of solvents
Fire
Health hazard
Eye wash / Shower rooms.
Adequate firefighting equipment is
provided at all storage areas and in
various parts of the plant.
MSDS sheets are available.
Use of PPE while handing the solvents.
Diesel and furnace
oil
Fire CO2, extinguishing powder or water jet,
alcohol - resistant foam.
Factory fire bridge.
Unloading trucks Fire/Explosion
Factory fire bridge and fire fighting systems.
7.4.6 MAXIMUM CREDIBLE ACCIDENT (MCA) ANALYSIS
The MCA scenarios were short-listed based on the storage quantities and properties of the
chemicals, (hazard identification). MCA analysis studies were conducted for following
scenario "Pool fire due to rupture/leakage and accumulation of solvents and fuel".
7.4.6.1 FIRE DAMAGE
A flammable liquid in a pool will burn with a large turbulent diffusion flame. This release of
heat is based on the heat of combustion and the burning rate of the liquid. A part of the heat
is radiated while the rest is convected away by the rising hot air and combustion products.
The radiation may heat the contents of a nearby storage or process unit to above its ignition
temperature and thus result in the spread of fire. The radiation may also cause severe burns
or fatalities of workers or fire fighters located within a certain distance. Hence, it will be
important to know beforehand the damage potential of a flammable liquid pool likely to be
created due to leakage or catastrophic failure of a storage or process vessel. This will help to
decide the type of protective clothing for the workers/fire fighters, the time they can be in
vicinity of the fire (without any significant danger to life and health), the fire extinguishing
systems needed and the protection needs for the nearby storage/process vessels. The
following table 7.6 & 7.7 presents the damage effect on equipment at different thermal
radiation levels & Radiation exposure and lethality.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 272 -
Table 7.6 :- Damage due to incident radiation intensities
Sl.
no.
Incident radiation
(kW/m2)
Type of damage intensity
Damage to equipment Damage to people
1 37.5 Damage to process
equipment
100% lethality in 1 min.
1% lethality in 10 s.
2 25.0 Minimum energy required to
ignite wood at indefinitely
long exposure without a
flame.
50% lethality in 1 min.
Significant injury in 10 s.
3 19.0 Maximum thermal radiation
intensity allowed on
thermally unprotected
adjoining equipment.
-
4 12.5 Minimum energy to ignite
with a flame; melts plastic
tubing
1 % lethality in 1 min.
5 4.5 - Causes pain if duration is
longer than 20 s; however
blistering is un-likely (first
degree burns)
6 1.6 - Causes no discomfort on long
exposures.
Table 7.7 :- Radiation exposure and lethality
Radiation intensity
(kW/m2)
Exposure time
(s)
Lethality
(%)
Degree of burns
1.6 - 0 No discomfort even
after long exposure.
4.5 20 0 1st
4.5 50 0 1st
8.0 20 0 1st
8.0 50 <1 3rd
8.0 60 <1 3rd
12.0 20 <1 2nd
12.0 50 8 3rd
12.5 60 1 3rd
25.0 60 50 3rd
37.5 60 100 3rd
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 273 -
For tank storage, it is assumed that the fuel leaks due to tank failure or rupture develops into a
pool and gets ignited (pool fire). Pool fire can also take place in case of pipeline rupture and
accumulation of solvents or fuels.
Following are the assumptions of the MCA analysis
no fire detection and mitigation measures are initiated;
secondary containment (dykes) that will confine flow of liquid and liquid absorption into
the ground is not considered;
secondary fire at public road and building is not likely to happen, since they are far away
from the storage area;
the effect of smoke on reduction of source radiation intensity has not been considered;
therefore hazard distances calculated tend to be conservative;
shielding effect of intervening trees or other structures has not been considered.
7.4.6.2 PROPERTIES OF SOLVENTS/FUELS
The chemical data for fuel and solvents is compiled from the MSDS, literature. The properties
of the same are presented in the following table 7.8.
Table 7.8: Properties of solvents and fuels
Sl. no.
Solvent/Fuel Molecular weight (g/mole)
Boiling point (oC)
Flash point (0F)
Specific gravity
1 Cyclohexane 98.15 g/mole 156 °C 109.4 °F 0.9478 @ 20 °C
2 Methanol 32.04 64.5 53.6 0.7915
3 Toluene 92.14 110.6 40 0.8636
4 Diesel oil (HSD) 500 - 1500 140 - 400 100-130 0.82 – 1.08
Note: NA – Not available
Adequate fire detection and protection systems needs to be installed to handle such
emergencies as suggested in the following table 7.9.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 274 -
Table 7.9: - Fire protection system proposed for M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited,
100% EOU
Suggested system
1. For unloading area (solvents and fuel), automatic detection system and manually
operated medium velocity water spray system along with foam system should be
provided.
2. An adequate number of portable chemical fire extinguishers will be installed at suitable
locations throughout the plant area. The extinguisher will be used during the early
stages of fire to prevent spreading while handling flammable solvents.
3. Hydrant system covering the entire plant including all important auxiliaries and
buildings will be installed. The system will be complete with piping, valves,
instrumentation, hoses, nozzles, hydrants valves etc.
4. All electrical fittings in hazardous area should be of flame-proof type.
7.4.7 SALIENT FEATURES OF RISK AUDITING AND ASSESSMENT
The risks associated with the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats
manufacturing industry with R & D activity are commensurate with their rapid growth and
development. Apart from their utility, chemicals and the raw materials used in their
production have their own inherent properties and hazards. Some of them can be flammable,
explosive, toxic or corrosive etc. The whole lifecycle of a chemical should be considered when
assessing its dangers and benefits. Though many of chemical accidents have a limited effect,
occasionally there are disasters like the one in Bhopal, India, in 1984, where lakhs of people
were affected and LPG explosion in Vizag refinery where huge property damage in addition
to 60 deaths was experienced. Therefore chemicals have the potential to affect the nearby
environment also.
Design and pre-modification review: Improper layout like location of plant in downwind
side of tank farm, fire station near process area, process area very close to public road
and wrong material of selection had caused severe damages to the work and outside
environment.
Chemical risk assessment: Not assessed for new chemicals from the point of view of
compatibility, storage, fire protection, toxicity, hazard index rating, fire and explosion
hazards.
Process safety management: HAZOP, FTA, F&E Index calculation, reliability assessment
of process equipment, incorporating safety trips and interlocks, scrubbing system, etc.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 275 -
not done before effecting major process changes, lack of Management of Change
procedure (MoC), etc.
Electrical safety: Hazardous area classification, protection against static electricity,
improper maintenance of specialized equipment like flameproof etc. were ignored.
Safety audits: Periodical assessment of safety procedures and practices, performance of
safety systems and gadgets along with follow up measures were not carried out.
Emergency planning: Lack of comprehensive risk analysis indicating the impact of
consequences and specific written down and practiced emergency procedures along
with suitable facilities had increased the severity of the emergency situations.
Training: Safety induction and periodical refresher training for the regular employees
and contract workmen were not carried out.
Risk management & insurance planning: Thorough identification and analysis of all risks
and insurance planning were not done so that interruption risks and public liability risks
could also be managed effectively.
A few reviews that are recommended for industries are:
7.4.7.1 FIRE PROTECTION
INDIAN STANDARDS
IS 2189 - Standard for automatic fire detection and alarm system.
IS 2190 - Code of practice for selection, installation and maintenance of first aid fire
extinguishers.
IS 3844 - Code of practice for installation and maintenance of internal fire hydrants and
hose reels.
IS 6382 - Carbon dioxide fire extinguishing system - fixed design and installation.
Oil Industry Safety Directorate
OISD 117 - Fire Protection Facilities for Petroleum Depots and Terminals.
OISD 142 - Inspection of firefighting equipment and systems.
OISD 158 - Recommended Practices on Storage and Handling of Bulk Liquefied
Petroleum Gas.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 276 -
NFPA STANDARDS
NFPA 12 - Carbon Dioxide Fire Extinguishing Systems.
NFPA 1600 - Disaster Management.
NFPA 921 - Fire & Explosion Investigation.
NFPA 45 - Fire protection for Laboratories using Chemicals.
7.4.7.2 OHS (OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY)
IS 14489 - Code of Practice for Occupational Safety & Health Audit.
NFPA 101 - Life Safety Code.
7.4.7.3 ER (ELECTRICAL RISK)
Hazardous Area Classification (base standard: IS 5572)
Selection of Electrical Equipment for Hazardous Areas (base standard: IS 5571)
Lightning Protection (base document: IS: 2309 /NFPA 780 /BS 6651)
NFPA 70 B - Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance
NFPA 70 E - Standard for Electrical Safety in Employee Work places
7.4.8 PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT
Hazard & Operability (HAZOP) studies
Failure Tree Analysis (FTA)
Event Tree Analysis (ETA)
Primary Hazard Analysis (PHA) using Dow Index
Risk Assessment (with risk ranking technique)
7.4.9 ELECTRICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Review of Hazardous Area Classification
Lightning Protection Risk Assessment
Identification & Control of Electro-Static Hazards
Review of electrical Preventive Maintenance System
Electrical Risk Assessment (fire, shock explosion) using Semi-Quantitative Risk Ranking
(SQRR) technique.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 277 -
7.4.10 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT
Identification & assessment of fire risks during operations in receipt, storage, transfer
and handling of chemicals (raw materials and finished products).
Identification & control of ignition sources in areas where flammable chemicals are
stored / handled / transferred.
o Review of chemical compatibility in storage areas and to suggest appropriate fire
loss control measures.
o Review of fire detection measures adopted in the plant & to suggest suitable
improvement measures.
o Review of the various active (fire hydrant, sprinkler, portable fire extinguishers)
and passive fire protection requirements for chemical storage and handling areas
and to suggest improvements as necessary.
o Review of contractor safety awareness (chemical spill, fire fighting, emergency
communication, knowledge of plant hazards & safety regulations) and to
recommend suitable improvement measures to enhance contractor safety.
o Review of safety awareness and safety training requirements (training
identification and efficacy) of plant employees with respect to hazards present in
the plant.
Fire risk assessment will be carried out based on techniques like Matrix method, Hani Raafat
Risk Calculator. The consequence, likelihood and exposure of each hazard are arrived using a
systematic approach and will help to determine the relative importance of hazard and focus
on significant risks.
7.4.11 RISK ANALYSIS & EMERGENCY PLAN
Identification of scenarios of potential disasters / emergencies leading to loss of life,
property damage etc. and qualitative assessment of their likelihood.
Quantitative risk assessment for selected scenarios of major credible events.
Recommendations for risk control measures wherever applicable.
Preparation of onsite emergency preparedness plan.
7.4.12 RISK MANAGEMENT & INSURANCE PLANNING
Identification of all major internal and external risks including the natural risks and analysis of the impact of above risks.
Review of existing risk control measures and offering comments. Scrutiny of all existing major insurance policies in respect of:
o Rationalization of basic rate of premium and widening of covers. o Applicability / eligibility of discounts in premium.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 278 -
o Application of suitable clauses, warranties and conditions.
Identification of possible areas for refund of premium and suggestions regarding procedure for the same.
Selection of insurance coverage on the basis of risk analysis. Providing guidelines for fixation of sum insured and illustrating the same on selected
equipment. Evaluation of business interruption exposure due to identified risks. Providing guidelines on documentation requirements, procedures for claims under
various policies, evaluation of insurers.
7.4.13 RISK MANAGEMENT TRAINING
Specialized and focussed training, if imparted effectively, can contribute significantly to Risk
Management. Expert faculty, carefully selected training module, interactive and participate
approach, useful training material, case studies and syndicate exercises could help in having
effective risk management system in place.
The training topics for industry could be:
Chemical safety
Safety with compressed gases
Solvent safety
Hazard identification techniques
Industrial risk management
Fire prevention and protection
Electrical risk management
Emergency preparedness
Safety management system
Accident prevention
Personal Protective Equipment
7.4.14 GENERAL GUIDELINES TO BE ADOPTED BY THE UNIT FOR MINIMIZING ASSOCIATED
RISKS AT M/s. SHILPA MEDICARE LIMITED.,
The plant should draft an environmental health and safety policy and work adhering to it.
1. The study is based on assumptions that the storage are designed, constructed and
operated in accordance with the safe engineering practices and standards. It is
recommended that strict adherence to the standards, accepted practices and operating
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 279 -
maintenance & safety procedures are followed not only during the installation of the
plant but also throughout the life of the plant.
2. Wind direction plays a major role in case of chemical releases. Hence adequate wind
socks are to be provided at strategic locations for people to notice and take appropriate
actions in case of an emergency.
3. Non essential personnel should be located away from the main plant area. These include
office staff, administration, accounts etc. and they should be restricted to the
administrative building.
4. The main plant area within the plant premises should be marked as high safety zone and
only operation and maintenance personnel and authorized staff/visitor should be
allowed to enter in this area. Any person entering this area, be it visitor or plant
personnel must be equipped with safety gadgets and must be made aware of the
assembly points.
5. The safety instructions and safe operating conditions (for the plant and machinery)
recommended by the manufacturers / vendors should be strictly followed.
6. Maintenance plays a vital role in proper upkeep of the plant. An equally important
function is monitoring of health of equipment, pipelines and machinery. The following
systems will be adopted
thickness survey (including supports),
maintenance history cards,
preventive maintenance practices
These will not only improve plant performance but also safety. It should be pointed out that
the failure rates of equipment and pipes are influenced by the maintenance practice followed.
When the plant starts aging, it is suggested that due attention to be given to this aspect when
formulating a maintenance strategy.
7.4.15 ACCIDENT REPORTING
7.4.15.1 INTRODUCTION
An accident is an unplanned event that results in injury, damage to property or some other
loss. The law requires that certain work-related accidents are reported to the local authority
or the Health and Safety Executive.
All accidents to employees, however minor, should be recorded. This is a requirement under
social security legislation. As a result of a workplace injury an employee may need to claim
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 280 -
for benefits in the future, and the relevant checks will be made to confirm that the accident
occurred at work.
Reporting and recording procedures vary. Employers need to be sure that they satisfy all legal
reporting requirements for employees and non-employees, and take measures to monitor
accidents. As part of the reactive monitoring process, accident records are needed to assess
whether the existing controls are adequate or to identify if trends are developing and to
implement new procedures.
7.4.15.2 ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENT/INCIDENT
The following actions are to be taken in the event of an accident/incident
Area to be made safe if necessary or possible.
First-aider to be contacted if there is an injured person. Alternatively, Security can be
contacted for first-aid assistance.
Report accident/incident to the relevant manager and/or safety officer. The safety
officer must investigate the accident recording corrective actions, sign the form and
forward a copy to the safety office within 4 days.
7.4.15.3 REPORTS TO BE GENERATED IN THE EVENT OF ACCIDENTS
The following reports have to be generated
Accidents involving employees, including minor injuries.
Accidents involving non-employees e.g visitors.
Incidents where no one is injured but there is a potential for injury.
Physical assaults or verbal abuse of employees.
Dangerous occurrences such as fires, gas leaks or explosions, chemical spillages,
damage to materials, failure or collapse of equipment etc.
Work-related ill-health from use of chemicals, occupational asthma, musculo-skeletal
pain etc.
7.4.15.4 THE REPORTING OF INJURIES, DISEASES AND DANGEROUS OCCURRENCES
REGULATIONS
The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations (RIDDOR) 1995
requires the Industry to notify certain work related injuries, illness and “dangerous
occurrences” (summarized below) to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) at the earliest
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 281 -
practicable time after the event. This reporting responsibility will be with the safety office
staff or the duty manager in the absence of safety personnel.
Any incident that results in a serious injury to an employee including
A break or fracture of any bone except those of the fingers or toes;
Any amputation;
Dislocation of the shoulder, hip, knee or spine;
Loss of sight (whether temporary or permanent);
Chemical or hot burn to the eye or any penetrating injury to the eye;
An injury resulting from electric shock or electrical burns;
An injury that leads to a loss of consciousness or requires resuscitation;
An injury resulting in an employee being unable to perform regular duties or being
away from work for 3 days or more;
An injury that requires the injured employee to be hospitalised for more than 24
hours.
Any accident or incident, connected with or arising out of the industrial work activity,
that results in a 'non-employee', i.e someone who is not a industry employee, being
taken from the scene of the accident to hospital for treatment. This is regardless
whether or not they are admitted into hospital.
Any dangerous occurrence such as fires.
Specified diseases associated with certain work activities, or exposure to certain
substances.
7.4.15.5 RESPONSIBILITIES
1. EMPLOYEES
It is the responsibility of individual employees to report accidents/incidents to their heads of
process as soon as possible. In most cases, individual employees will complete their own
accident report form but it is important that this form is forwarded to the safety officer.
2. SAFETY OFFICER
Safety officer must ensure that all accidents are investigated to identify underlying causes,
the accident/investigation report form is completed and the original is forwarded to the
safety office within 4 days of the accident. The safety officer should recommend appropriate
corrective actions and ensure that risk assessments are revised if necessary.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 282 -
3. MANAGERS
Managers must ensure that corrective actions are implemented and communicated to all
relevant persons.
If an employee is absent as a result of an accident then the manager or safety officer must
complete the form on his/her behalf.
4. SAFETY OFFICE
Maintaining records: record of incidents and investigations reports will be maintained by the
Safety Office according to statutory requirements.
Investigating: The safety office will investigate all serious incidents/dangerous
occurrences/near misses/diseases.
Monitoring: The safety office will monitor the details and information provided on the
accident investigation report form, follow-up on corrective actions and report trends to the
safety officer.
The incident and accident investigation and reporting procedure will be audited as part of
each area’s Health and Safety Management audit.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 283 -
7.4.15.6 INCIDENT/ACCIDENT REPORTING AND INVESTIGATION FLOW CHART FOR WORK-
RELATED ACCIDENTS/INCIDENT AND NEAR MISSES
7.4.16 CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM THE RISK ASSESSMENT STUDIES CARRIED OUT FOR
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited.,
The risk assessment studies carried out for the industry, M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., has
covered various aspects encompassing hazard identification, severity mapping for fire and
spillages, MCA analysis studies etc.
No
*Work-related accidents/incidents involving employees
Accidents/incidents involving non-
employees i.e visitors
Fatality or taken from
the scene of accident to hospital for treatment
Major injury ** or fatality
Over 3 day’s incapacity or
absence from work
Contact process head or manager on duty immediately
Investigate and send completed accident form to safety office
within 4 days
All other accidents including acts of violence against staff and near
misses
Yes
*Work-related accidents, near misses and illnesses are those that are attributed to work activity, equipment and substances, condition of the premises or the level of supervision.
**Major injuries include fractures (except fingers and toes), amputations, loss of sight, 24 hrs hospitalization etc.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 284 -
Based on the above it can be concluded that there are sample risks associated with the
handling of various solvents and fuel as elucidated in the severity matrix studies.
Suitable fire protection system and general guidelines to be adopted by the industry and
preventive systems provided to prevent or reduce the hazards have been proposed.
The management of M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., is committed to the implementation of
the recommendations of the risk assessment report in true spirits.
7.5 AIR POLLUTION DISPERSION MODELING STUDIES
7.5.1 INTRODUCTION
Atmospheric dispersion modeling is the mathematical simulation of how air pollutants
disperse in the ambient atmosphere. It is performed with computer programs that solve the
mathematical equations and algorithms which simulate the pollutant dispersion. The
dispersion models are used to estimate or to predict the downwind concentration of air
pollutants emitted from sources such as industrial plants and vehicular traffic. Such models
are important to governmental agencies tasked with protecting and managing the ambient
air quality. The models are typically employed to determine whether existing or proposed
new industrial facilities are or will be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) in the United States and other nations. The models also serve to assist in
the design of effective control strategies to reduce emissions of harmful air pollutants.
In the present study prediction of impacts on the air environment has been carried out
employing U.S. EPA AERMOD dispersion model, 1996 – 2016 Lakes Environmental Software,
Version 7.1.0 and designed for multiple sources for predicting the maximum ground level
concentration (GLC).
7.5.2 MODEL INPUT DATA
The major air emissions at the site of M/s Shilpa Medicare Limited., are SPM, SO2 and NOx
from boilers and DGs. The Proponents have proposed to provide adequate stacks to the
process section. Also the manufacturing process involves reactions in completely closed
reactors and therefore no emissions are anticipated. The site specific details considered as
input data for the software (AERMOD view by Lakes Environmental) to predict the impacts
on the air environment are given in the following table 7.10.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 285 -
Table 7.10: Data considered for calculation of GLC
Particulars Details
DG set
(625 kVA
– 3no.s)
750 kVA – 1 no Boiler
(6 TPH – 1 no.)
10 TPH -1 no.
Stack height, m 5 mtr
(ARL)
10 Mtr (ARL) 30 Mtr (AGL) 30 Mtr (AGL)
Stack diameter, m 0.5 mtr 0.5 mtr 1.12 mtr 1.12 mtr
Flue gas temperature, 0C
120 to
130 0C
125 to 130 0C 130 to 140 0C 130 to 140 0C
Gas exit velocity, m/s 7 to 8
m/s
7 to 8 m/s 7 to 8 m/s 7 to 8 m/s
Emission rate, g/s
PM10 0.00186 0.016763 0.11616 0.1936
SO2 0.0341 0.041012 0.00366 0.0061
NOx 0.05588 0.11175 0.00126 0.0021
CO 0.48425 0.5811 0.24198 0.4033
7.5.3 METEOROLOGICAL DATA
Data recorded at the site for one year period (2016) for wind speed, direction and
temperature has been used for computations. In order to conduct a refined air dispersion
modeling short term air quality dispersion models, the site specific hourly meteorological
data measured at the site is pre-processed using U.S. EPA AERMET program.
7.5.4 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
The simulations were made to evaluate incremental short-term concentrations due to
proposed project.
In the short-term simulations, the incremental concentrations were estimated to obtain an
optimum description of variations in concentrations within study area of 10 km radius. The
predicted results are tabulated in the following table.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 286 -
Table 7.11 is presented the Predicted incremental short-term concentrations due to the proposed project – existing with proposed Fig 7.1 is presented Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10) isotherms for the proposed project (existing+proposed) for i) 24 hours – 1st highest value, ii) 24 hours – 98 percentile, iii) Annual Fig 7.2 is presented the Sulfur di-oxide (SO2) isotherms for proposed project (existing + proposed) for i) 24 hours – 1st highest value, ii) 24 hours – 98 percentile, iii) Annual Fig 7.3 is presented the Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) isotherms for proposed project (existing+proposed) for i) 24 hours – 1st highest value, ii) 24 hours – 98 percentile and iii) Annual. Fig 7.4 is presented the Carbon monoxide (CO) isotherms for proposed project (existing + proposed) for i) 1 hour – 1st highest value, ii) 1 hour – 98 percentile, iii) 8 hours – 1st highest value, iv) 8 hours – 98 percentile. Table 7.11 is presented the Resultant maximum 24 hourly concentrations
Table 7.11: Predicted incremental short-term concentrations due to the proposed project
Time Maximum predicted
concentrations, µg/m3
Direction and distance of occurrence
24 hour Annual 24 hour Annual
1ST
highest
values
98
percentile
1ST
highest
values
98 percentile
Suspended
Particulate
Matter
(PM10)
0.96121 0.73359 0.1826
9
0.338
km- NE
0.328 km -NE 0.13 km -
NE
Sulfur di-
oxide (SO2)
13.41829 8.58964 1.9416
8
0.29847
km – NW
0.684 km – S
0.862 KM –N
0.825 KM - E
1.355 KM - W
Within
site
boundary
Oxides of
nitrogen
(NOx)
29.8148 18.81924 4.2930
2
0.301 km
– NW
0.935 km – N
1.824K M – W
0.753 KM - S
1.776 KM -E
Within
site
boundary
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 287 -
Carbon
monoxide
(CO)
1 hr –
190.50
8 hr –
516.874
1 hr –
121.83
8 hr –
179.16
27.58 1 hr –
0.318
NW
8 hr –
0.57 NW
1 hr – 3.410 N
& 9.703 S
&
8 hr – 0.57 KM
NW
Within
the site
boundary
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 288 -
Fig 7.1: Suspended Particulate Matter (PM) isotherms for the proposed project
i) 24 hours – 1st highest value
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 289 -
ii) 24 hours – 98 percentile
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 290 -
iii) Annual
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 291 -
Fig 7.2: Sulfur di-oxide (SO2) isotherms for proposed project
i) 24 hours – 1st highest value
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 292 -
ii) 24 hours – 98 percentile
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 293 -
iii) Annual
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 294 -
Fig 7.3: Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) isotherms for proposed project
i) 24 hours – 1st highest value
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 295 -
ii) 24 hours – 98 percentile
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 296 -
iii) Annual
Fig 7.5: Carbon monoxide (CO) isotherms for proposed project (Existing + Proposed)
i) 1 hour – 1st highest value
ii) 1 hour – 98 percentile
iii) 8 hours – 98 percentile
iv) Annual
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 297 -
Fig 7.4: Oxides of Corbon Monoxide (CO) isotherms for proposed project
i) 24 hours – 1st highest value
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 298 -
ii) 8 hours – 1st highest value
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 299 -
iii) 24hours-98th Percentile
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 300 -
iv) 8 hours-98th Percentile
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 301 -
v) Annual
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 302 -
7.5.5 COMMENTS
The maximum short-term incremental ground-level concentrations are superimposed on the
baseline data to get the likely resultant levels after the establishment of the proposed project
as tabulated in below table 7.12.
Table 7.12: Resultant maximum 24 hourly concentrations
Pollutant Incremental
concentrations,
µg/m3
Max. baseline
concentrations,
µg/m3
Resultant
concentrations,
µg/m3
Limits as
per MoEF,
µg/m3 for
industrial
areas (24
hrs)
Percentage
(%)Resultant
concentrations
Below the threshold
limits
PROJECT SITE (A1)
PM10 0.73359 54.33 55.06359 100 44.94
SO2 8.58964 13.5 22.08964 80 57.92
NOx 18.81924 11.03 29.84924 80 50.16
CO 1 hr – 121.83
8 hr – 179.16
0.5 1 hr –122.33
8 hr – 179.66
4,000 – 1 hr
2,000 – 8
hrs
96.94
91.01
Chiksugur (downwind direction) (A2)
PM10 0.73359 35.66 36.39359 100 63.61
SO2 8.58964 7.4 15.98964 80 64.02
NOx 18.81924 8.36 27.17924 80 52.81
CO 1 hr – 121.83
8 hr – 179.16
0.5 1 hr –122.33
8 hr – 179.66
4,000 – 1 hr
2,000 – 8
hrs
96.94
91.01
Hanumandoddi (A3)
PM10 0.73359 35.33 36.06359 100 63.94
SO2 8.58964 6.5 15.08964 80 64.92
NOx 18.81924 8.8 27.61924 80 52.39
CO 1 hr – 121.83
8 hr – 179.16
0.5 1 hr – 122.33
8 hr – 179.66
4,000 – 1 hr
2,000 – 8
hrs
96.94
91.01
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 303 -
Yermaras (A4)
PM10 0.73359 36 36.73359 100 63.27
SO2 8.58964 8.5 17.08964 80 62.92
NOx 18.81924 7.9 26.71924 80 53.29
CO 1 hr – 121.83
8 hr – 179.16
0.5 1 hr – 122.33
8 hr – 179.66
4,000 – 1 hr
2,000 – 8
hrs
96.94
91.01
Hospet (A5)
PM10 0.73359 35.33 36.06359 100 63.94
SO2 8.58964 8 16.58964 80 63.42
NOx 18.81924 8.4 27.21924 80 52.79
CO 1 hr – 121.83
8 hr – 179.16
0.5 1 hr – 122.33
8 hr – 179.66
4,000 – 1 hr
2,000 – 8
hrs
96.94
91.01
Shaktinagar (A6)
PM10 0.73359 33 33.73359 100 66.27
SO2 8.58964 8.0 16.58964 80 63.46
NOx 18.81924 8.3 27.11924 80 52.89
CO 1 hr – 121.83
8 hr – 179.16
0.5 1 hr –122.33
8 hr – 179.66
4,000 – 1 hr
2,000 – 8
hrs
96.94
91.01
According to MoEF air quality standards (as per the notification dated 16th November 2009
for industrial, residential & rural areas) 24 hourly or 8 hourly or 1 hourly monitored values, as
applicable, shall be complied with 98% of the time in a year; 2% of the time, they may exceed
the limits but not on two consecutive days of monitoring.
Therefore the 98% values are considered for estimation of the incremental concentration.
The above table indicates that the cumulative resultant ambient air quality after proposed
project operation will be within the ambient air quality limits specified by MoEF as per the
notification dated 16th November 2009 for industrial, residential & rural areas.
7.6 PUBLIC CONSULTATION
The industry is proposed to be established at a designated industrial area (KIADB). Therefore
the proposed project falls under CATEGORY 5(f) & no public consultation is required.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 304 -
7.7 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, R&R ACTION PLANS
The proposed project is an Expansion and modification of an Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediates manufacturing industry with R&D activity in an existing
insudtry. The existing land is sufficient for the proposal also & therefore no re-settlement &
re-habilitation is envisaged.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 305 -
CHAPTER 8
PROJECT BENEFITS
8.1 IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE, SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
The proposed project is an Expansion and modification of an Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediates manufacturing industry with R&D activity in an existing
insudtry.
8.2 TANGIBLE BENIFITS
The proposed project will generate direct and indirect employment opportunities for the
local people. The plant will create employment as under
The total employment potential of the industry is detailed below
Managerial – 10
Skilled – 350
Semi-skilled – 190
Un-skilled –50
TOTAL - 600
Additionally, certain works like security will be outsourced on contract. Secondary
employment in the form of providing services to the employed manpower will also be
developed in the neighboring villages.
The company will also take part in the development of the surroundings villages by following
ways:
There will not be any displacement of people from the project as the industry is
coming up in the designated industrial area in the existing allotted plot from KIADB
and land being allocated to the project. Also it is an existing & on-going industry.
Employment opportunities for the local people.
Conducting Medical Camps for medical examination of the villagers and distribution
of medicines.
Funding the local educational facilities.
The company will also provide funds for the various development activities of the
neighboring villages as and when required.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 306 -
8.3 INTANGIBLE BENEFITS
Products manufactured will be at affordable prices when compared to international
manufacturers. This plant will employ skilled and semi-skilled people from the
surrounding areas.
With this project, business for ancillary units like equipment manufacturers, machining
works, motor rewinding for regular maintenance, shut down annual and mechanical
consumable vendors, periodical painting works etc. thereby giving the indirect
maintenance people like equipment suppliers and various consumable vendors
employment opportunities.
To us, a commitment to sustainability means a commitment to fulfilling our obligations
to all of our stakeholders -- our customers and partners, employees, shareholders and
society. Thus, while optimizing profitability may be one measurement of our
performance, we also judge our success by our performance with regard to the
communities in which we live and work, the environment and our employees. We
understand that it is only by increasing value to all of these stakeholders that we can build
an ever flourishing and lasting organization.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 307 -
CHAPTER 9
ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT
ANALYSIS
9.1 INTRODUCTION
Cost–benefit analysis (CBA), sometimes called benefit–cost analysis (BCA), is a systematic
process for calculating and comparing benefits and costs of a project for two purposes
to determine if it is a sound investment (justification/feasibility)
to see how it compares with alternate projects (ranking/priority assignment)
It involves comparing the total expected cost of each option against the total expected
benefits, to see whether the benefits outweigh the costs, and by how much.
In CBA, benefits and costs are expressed in money terms, and are adjusted for the time value
of money, so that all flows of benefits and flows of project costs over time (which tend to
occur at different points in time) are expressed on a common basis in terms of their "present
value."
ENVIRONMENTAL COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS, refers to the economic appraisal of policies and
projects that have the deliberate aim of improving the provision of environmental services or
actions that might affect (sometimes adversely) the environment as an indirect consequence.
9.2 USES OF CBA
► CBA has traditionally been applied to big public sector projects such as new motorways,
by-passes, dams, tunnels, bridges, flood relief schemes and new power stations.
► The basic principles of CBA can be applied to many other projects or programmes. For
example, -public health programmes (e.g. the mass immunization of children using new
drugs), an investment in a new rail safety systems, or opening a new railway line, or the
costs and benefits of the new deal programme designed to reduce long-term
unemployment. Cost benefit analysis was also used during the recent inquiry
into genetically modified foods. Increasingly the principles of cost benefit analysis are
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 308 -
being used to evaluate the returns from investment in environmental projects such as
wind farms and the development of other sources of renewable energy.
► Because financial resources are scarce, CBA allows different projects to be ranked
according to those that provide the highest expected net gains in social welfare - this is
particularly important given the limitations of government spending.
9.3 MAIN STAGES
The main stages in the CBA approach are detailed below
Stage 1(a)
Calculation of social costs & social benefits. This would include calculation of
Tangible benefits and costs (i.e. direct costs and benefits)
Intangible benefits and costs (i.e. indirect costs and benefits – externalities)
This process is very important – it involves trying to identify all of the significant costs &
benefits.
Stage 1(b)
Sensitivity analysis of events occurring i.e. determination of how likely is it that a predicted
outcome will occur? If we are reasonably sure that a benefit or cost will ‘occur’ – what is the
scale of uncertainty about the actual values of the costs and benefits?
Stage 2
Discounting the future value of benefits - costs and benefits accrue over time. Individuals
normally prefer to enjoy the benefits now rather than later – so the value of future benefits
has to be discounted.
Stage 3
Comparing the costs and benefits to determine the net social rate of return.
Stage 4
Comparing net rate of return from different projects – the government may have limited
funds at its disposal and therefore faces a choice about which projects should be given the
go-ahead.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 309 -
9.4 DISADVANTAGES
There are several objections to the use of CBA for environmental impact assessment:
1) Problems in attaching valuations to costs and benefits: Some costs are easy to value
such as the running costs (e.g. staff costs) + capital costs (new equipment). Other costs
are more difficult – not least when a project has a significant impact on the
environment. The value attached to the destruction of a habitat is to some “priceless”
and to others “worthless”. Costs are also subject to change over time – i.e. the
construction costs of a new bridge over a river or the introduction of electronic road
pricing.
2) The CBA may not cover everyone affected (i.e. all third parties): Inevitably with major
construction projects such as a new airport or a new road, there are a huge number
of potential “stakeholders” who stand to be affected (positively or negatively) by the
decision. CBA cannot hope to include all stakeholders – there is a risk that some
groups might be left out of the decision process, for example future generations &
“non-human” stakeholders
3) Distributional consequences: Costs and benefits mean different things to different
income groups - benefits to the poor are usually worth more (or are they?). Those
receiving benefits and those burdened with the costs of a project may not be the
same.
4) Social welfare is not the same as individual welfare: What we want individually may
not be what we want collectively. A different value is not attached to those who feel
“passionately” about something (for example the building of new housing on
greenfield sites) contrasted with those who are more ambivalent?
5) Valuing the environment: Valuation of the public goods such as the environment
where there is no market established for the valuation of “property rights” over
environmental resources is very difficult. Similarly things such as “nuisance” and
“aesthetic values” are very ambiguous & difficult to value.
6) Valuing human life: Some measurements of benefits require the valuation of human
life – many people are intrinsically opposed to any attempt to do this. This objection
can be partly overcome if we focus instead on the probability of a project “reducing
the risk of death” – and there are insurance markets in existence which tell something
about how much people value their health and life when they take out insurance
policies.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 310 -
7) Attitudes to risk – e.g. a cost benefit analysis of the effects of genetically modified
foods
Precautionary principle: Assume toxicity until proven safe; if in doubt, then
regulate
Free market principle: Assume it is safe until a hazard is identified; if in doubt, do
not regulate.
Despite these problems, most economists argue that CBA is better than other ways of
including the environment in project appraisal.
Cost benefit analysis is basically an appraisal technique that tries to place monetary values
on all benefits arising from a project and then compares the total value with the project's
total cost. It has numerous potential applications although there are inherent difficulties with
the issue of valuation. Essentially the process of CBA is a comparative one, so that we can
perhaps make judgments about which projects from a limited choice should be given the go
ahead.
9.5 DISCOUNTING THE FUTURE
Discounting is a widely used technique as part of cost benefit analysis. The technique of
discounting reflects the following:
the value of a cost or benefit now
the value of a cost or benefit in future years
Discounting reflects this by reducing all future costs and benefits to express them as today’s
values. The key question being - how to choose an ‘interest rate’ for reducing future costs to
give them a present value today?
Setting a general discount rate for new projects has important implications for the
environment:
A low discount rate is often favored by economists since they argue that investing a
high proportion of current income is a good way of providing for the future.
A high discount rate may also be favored since it discourages investment (and by
implication environmental damage) in the present.
Most projects have lifetimes of 20-30 years – with many of the big costs arising early in a
project e.g. from construction whereas the stream of benefits from a project occur over a
much longer period of time. But for many huge construction projects, some of the costs only
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 311 -
become apparent in the long run. Consider the building of a new nuclear power station.
Environmentalists would argue that there is a long list of costs from waste management and
decommissioning which stretch over 100 years into the future whereas no social benefits
exist to offset these costs beyond year 30 or 40 (where the nuclear power station might
reasonably be expected to be ready for closure).
The value of decommissioning costs over 100 years away is almost negligible no matter what
discount rate we use. This makes discounting difficult to justify.
9.6 COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR M/S. SHILPA MEDICARE LIMITED.,
CBA for M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., Is tabulated in below table 9.1.
Table 9.1: CBA for M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited.,
Costs Benefits
Charges paid to Pollution Control Board
for not meeting standards or threat of
closure.
Savings in costs for meeting standards.
DAMAGES CAUSED BY WATER
POLLUTION
a) Waterborne diseases
b) Losses to farmers
c) Degradation of soil fertility and
increase in toxicity
d) Degradation of water aquifer
BENEFITS INCURRED DUE TO WATER
POLLUTION PREVENTION/CONTROL
a) Savings due to water borne diseases
avoided through proper treatment of
both domestic & industrial wastewater.
b) Degradation of soil fertility & water
aquifer reversed.
DAMAGES CAUSED BY AIR POLLUTION
a) Airborne diseases.
b) Losses to farmers due to increase in
oxides of sulfur concentrations.
BENEFITS INCURRED DUE TO AIR
POLLUTION PREVENTION/CONTROL
a) Savings due to air borne diseases
avoided through proper maintenance
& management of air pollution sources.
b) Losses to the farmers reversed.
DAMAGES CAUSED BY NOISE POLLUTION
Health & behavioral effects on humans
BENEFITS INCURRED DUE TO NOISE
POLLUTION PREVENTION/CONTROL
Health & behavioral effects on humans
reversed.
DAMAGES CAUSED BY SOLD/HAZARDOUS
WASTE
a) Impact on aesthetics.
b) Degradation of groundwater aquifer.
BENEFITS INCURRED DUE TO SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT/CONTROL
a) Impacts on aesthetics reversed by
proper management.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 312 -
b) Degradation of water aquifer reversed
by proper management.
- BENEFITS TO THE SOCIAL/ECONOMIC
ENVIRONMENT
a) Employment and income generation
from industries.
b) Infrastructural development benefits
due to proximity of industries.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 313 -
CHAPTER 10
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)
10.1 INTRODUCTION
The Environment Management Plan (EMP) is required to ensure sustainable development
in the area of the proposed project. Hence it needs to be an all encompassive plan for which
the industry, Government, Regulating agencies like Pollution Control Board working in the
region and more importantly the population of the area need to extend their co-operation
and contribution.
It has been evaluated that the project area will not be affected significantly with proposed
project. Mitigation measures at the source level and an overall Management Plan at the
site level are elicited so as to improve the surrounding environment.
The following mitigation measures are recommended in order to synchronize the economic
development of the project area with the environmental protection of the region. The
construction phase impacts are mostly short term, restricted to the plot area and not
envisaged on the larger scale. Also since it is coming in an existing industry major impacts
are not anticipated. In the operational phase the environmental impacts are due to
continuous operation of the project, hence, the emphasis in the Environment Management
Plan (EMP) is to minimize such impacts.
The emphasis on the EMP development is on the following:
Mitigation measures for each of the activities causing the environmental impact;
Monitoring plans for checking activities and environmental parameters and
monitoring responsibilities;
Role responsibilities and resource allocation for monitoring.
Following sections describes in brief the environment management plan proposed for
construction and operation phases.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 314 -
10.2 MITIGATION MEASURES
Each of the activities during production phase is critically reviewed for suggestion of
mitigation measures. Based on this, the table 10.1 gives the mitigation measures for the
activities considered to be causing significant environmental impacts during construction
phase & table 10.2 during operation phase. Table 10.3 gives the environmental management
plan during storage, handling & transportation of raw materials and products.
In general the best housekeeping practices are incorporated in the design as well as in
production phase to reduce the short term impacts due to the proposed activities.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 315 -
10.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)
The environmental management plan during construction phase and occupancy phase is detailed in tables 10.1 & 10.2.
Environmnetal Management Paln during construction phase
Table 10.1:- Environmnetal Management Paln during construction phase
Sl. no.
Environmental components
Predicted impacts Probable source of impact
Mitigation measures Remarks
1 Ambient air quality
Negative impact inside the construction site premises. No negative impact outside.
Fugitive dust emissions generated during construction in the beginning followed by fabrication, erection of plant and machinery during later part of the project.
Carrying out the construction activities in closed manner.
Intermittent spraying of water.
Use of PPE.
Impacts are temporary (only during construction period) in nature. Also the proposed project does not involve extensive construction activities as it is an expansion proposal of an existing industry & optimum utilization of the existing infrastructure facilities will be made; construction is more of fabrication and erection type.
2 Noise Negative impact near noise generation sources inside the premises. No significant impact on the ambient noise levels in the surrounding area.
Noise generation from construction activities and operation of construction equipments and also from the movement of vehicles carrying construction materials to and from the project site.
Use of well maintained equipment.
Use of PPE – ear plugs and muffs by the construction workers.
Temporary impact only during construction phase.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 316 -
3 Water quality No significant impact Discharge of sewage from laborers.
The sewage generated shall be mixed with the low strength wastewater from the existing industry & is treated in Existing ETP.
Impact will be temporary. Local laborers shall be
employed.
4 Land No negative impact Waste from laborers. Waste from laborers will be collected and composted on site. Non-compostable waste will be sent for recycling.
-
5 Socio-economic Overall positive impact
Employment opportunities
- -
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 317 -
Operation of the facilities/utilities
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN DURING OPERATION PHASE
Table 10.2:- ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN DURING OPERATION PHASE
Sl. no.
Environmental components
Predicted impacts
Probable source of impact Mitigation measures Remarks
6 Ambient air quality
Minor negative impact.
Process of manufacture of APIs & Intermediates
Particulate and gaseous emissions from DG set and boilers & Thermic Fluid heater
Manufacturing process involves closed operations in various controlled reactors.
The process area will be provided with abundant natural light and ventilation and high roofs to disperse the fumes/gases to the outside atmosphere; preventing the increase of ground level concentrations (GLC’S) as it gets dispersed.
Packed column scrubbers are proposed to neutralize and control dust and fumes from the process section.
The treated waste gases and fumes will be let out through stacks of 5 m height ARL.
DG sets will be used only during power failure.
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 318 -
The emissions from DG & boiler will be let out through stacks of heights 3 m ARL and 32 m AGL respectively.
7 Noise Minor negative impact near noise generation sources inside the premises.
Operation of machineries during the manufacturing process.
Handling and conveying of raw materials and semi-finished components to different areas of operations
Operation of DG set.
The conveying system shall be maintained by following routine and periodic maintenance to reduce noise generation in material handling.
DG set with prebuilt acoustic enclosure as per CPCB norms will be installed in dedicated utility area, where the access will be restricted. Also the use of PPE (ear plugs) will be mandatory in this area.
Green belt at the project boundary will further act as noise barrier and help in attenuation of noise.
-
8 Water quality No significant adverse impact
Discharge of domestic sewage and industrial effluent
Domestic sewage will be mixed with low strength wastewater stream & re-used for cooling tower make-up water etc.
The effluent generated from the industry will be treated in ETP followed by RO & MEE.
Water conservation measures will be encouraged.
9 Land No negative impact
Discharge of wastewater.
Storage and disposal of solid wastes.
The treated wastewater will be re-used for cooling tower make-up water etc.
-
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 319 -
The domestic solid wastes are segregated at source, collected in bins and composted and inert portion will be handed over to authorized recyclers.
10 Socio-economic Overall positive impact
Employment opportunities
Locally available man power will be utilized to the maximum possible extent.
-
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 320 -
a. Storage, handling & transportation of raw materials and products
Environmental management plan during storage, handling & transportation of raw
materials and products is detailed in table 10.3.
Table 10.3: Environmental management plan during storage, handling &
transportation of raw materials and products
Activity Environmental
impacts
Mitigation Remarks
Storage of all
the raw
materials,
products.
• Air
• Water
• Land
Hydrogen, organic chemicals & solvents
to be stored in accordance with the rules
and regulations of the Safety
Department.
Separate storage area for solid/liquid
raw materials.
Gas detectors with alarm will be
installed for detection of fugitive
emissions.
Installation of proper facilities to
prevent rain/storm water
contamination during the storage of
solid raw materials.
Ensure disposal of used drums, bags as
per the rules/regulations.
Implementation
Responsibility:
M/s. Shilpa
Medicare Limited.,
Transportation
of all the raw
materials,
finished
products &
hazardous
wastes.
• Air
• Water
• Land
Trained/Approved Transports will be
engaged for the transportation of the
raw materials/products.
TREMCARD will be followed to ensure
availability of MSDS of all the raw
materials and finished products to the
off-site emergency team.
Implementation
responsibility:
M/s. Shilpa
Medicare Limited.,
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 321 -
10.4 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., 100% Export Oriented Unit, Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40
to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road, Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur
Dist, Karnataka intends to expand and modify the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
(APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity in an existing industry at
Unit –II, Plot No. 33, 33A & 40 to 47, Raichur, Industrial Growth Centre, Wadloor Road,
Chicksugur - 584134, Raichur Dist.
The Board of Directors of M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., recognize the important
responsibility it has towards the environment, and is committed to:
Complying with all applicable environmental legislation.
Planned evaluation of compliance by external auditors and the implementation of
improvement programmes.
Continuous improvement by following best practice guidance produced by
appropriate regulatory and advisory organisations and aim to get certified to
ISO-14001, the internationally recognised Environmental Management System
standard.
Ensuring that all employees are aware of their duty to fellow employees, suppliers,
customers and those who live in the surrounding community, to act in an
environmentally responsible and safe manner.
Collecting, analysing and publishing key environmental performance metrics to
enable the Group to continually review, assess and improve its environmental
performance.
Minimising, where practicable, the Group’s impact on the local and global
environment arising from its operations and products, by:
Integrating environmental considerations into the development of any new
products and processes;
Achieving a reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases by using energy, raw
materials and natural resources efficiently;
Reducing the emissions of harmful substances and where practicable using
alternative environmentally safer substances in its manufacturing processes;
Reducing waste generated by its operations through recycling programmes
and minimising the amount of waste sent to landfill.
Working with all the suppliers to minimise the impact of their products and
operations on the environment.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 322 -
The Board delegates responsibility for oversight of environmental policy and performance
to all to the Director, Management and employees for local implementation of this policy.
This policy and its implementation will be reviewed on a regular basis by the Board to
ensure that it remains appropriate and relevant to the organization. The Group is
committed to providing the necessary support in order to ensure that all sites can fulfill
the requirements outlined in this policy.
This policy will be communicated to everyone working for or on behalf of the Group. The
non compliance will be communicated and will be brought to the notice of all the board
of directors during the board meeting.
The Health Safety & Environment Policy of the Company is appended as Annexure- 2
10.5 DESCRIPTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS OF ENSURING THAT MITIGATIVE
MEASURES ARE IMPLEMENTED & THEIR EFFECTIVENESS MONITORED, AFTER
APPROVAL, IMPLEMENTATION AND DURING OPERATION
In order to maintain the environmental quality within the standards, regular monitoring
network to maintain environmental quality will be implemented.
10.5.1 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT CELL
A separate Environment Management Cell will be established to monitor and control the
environmental quality. Members of the Environmental Cell would be well qualified and
experienced in the concerned field. Some experienced people & few new people will be
appointed to take care of the requirement.
Services of reputed laboratories as well as that of a consultant of repute would be
engaged for various monitoring & other environmental management needs of the plant
from time to time.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 323 -
FIG 10.1:- ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Manager –Head
Technician - 1 Technician -2
Field Assistance - 1 Field Assistance - 2
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 324 -
CHAPTER 11
SUMMARY & CONCLUSION
11.1 OVERALL JUSTIFICATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT
The Environmental Impact Assessment studies carried out for the proposed project of
M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., has been completed. The study conducted has covered
various facts of the proposed expansion project starting with the need for expansion, its
basic requirements like raw materials, water requirement, availability of land,
manufacturing process etc.
In addition to this the metrological data and baseline environmental features have been
evaluated to understand the environmental setting of the project site. Based on the
baseline environmental survey air pollution modeling studies were carried out to predict
the impact of the proposed project on the air environment. Also the ecological features
of the location including the flora & fauna, socio-economic environment, the
demographic structure have been evaluated.
Based on the above studies an Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared to
ascertain the possible impacts of the proposed project on the environmental parameters
like air, water, land, biological and socio-economic environment. An impact matrix has
also been prepared based on the observations of the impacts on the environment.
An Environmental Management Plan has been prepared covering the environmental
aspect and the management plan required to be adopted by the management not only
during the course of setting up of the proposed industry but also during its operational
phase. An environmental monitoring plan is envisaged deciding frequency, location, data
analysis, reporting schedules.
Detailed risk assessment study is carried out to evaluate the risks involved due to storage
of various solvents & precautionary measures to be taken for prevention/management of
such risks.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 325 -
The conclusions drawn from the above study relates to the fact that the proposed project
is Establishment of an expansion and modificationof the Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) & Intermediats manufacturing industry with R & D activity undertaken
by the management of the industry has certain level or marginal impacts on the local
environmental setting, which will not affect the natural environmental setting of the
study zone either drastically or otherwise. However, certain beneficial impacts are
anticipated in terms of the employment opportunities created during the operation of
the industry. Also there will be economic growth at the regional level.
The industry proposes to create Environmental Management Cell in its organization to
monitor and implement programs to improve its environmental status from time to time
and will adopt all such technological advances to reduce the impact due to its operation
on the environment.
To put it in a nut shell the management of M/s. Shilpa Medicare Limited., strongly believes
in the concept of sustainable development and understands the impacts of the proposed
industry on the environment from the Environmental Impact Assessment studies
conducted. It is committed to develop its industry without giving room for any adverse
impacts on the environment and also lays emphasis on the implementation of the
recommendations of the Environmental Management Plan in true spirits.
11.2 EXPLANATION OF HOW ADVERSE EFFECTS HAVE BEEN MITIGATED
The measures adopted to mitigate the impacts due to the proposed expansion is
tabulated below table 11.0.
Table 11.0 :- Measures adopted to mitigate the impacts
Sl.
no.
Parameter Mitigation measures
1 Water pollution sources
Domestic sewage Domestic sewage generated from the project will be
treatred in existing ETP.
Industrial
wastewater
Effluent generated from the project will be treated in Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) effluent treatment plant with MEE and RO system
2 Air pollution sources
D.G. sets Stacks of adequate heights
Steam boilers Stacks of adequate heights.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 326 -
3 Noise pollution
sources – DG sets
In-built acoustic enclosures.
4 Solid/Hazardous waste
Domestic garbage Organic portion is composted & in-organic portion is sent for
recycling.
Hazardous solid
waste
Disposed through
TSDF (Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility) or
Handed over to authorized agency or
Handed over to the manufacturers for recharge & re-
use.
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 327 -
CHAPTER 12
DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED
12.1 THE NAMES OF THE CONSULTANTS ENGAGED WITH THEIR BRIEF RESUME &
NATURE OF CONSULTANCY RENDERED
Address: SAMRAKSHAN F- 4, I Floor, Swastik Manandi Arcade,
S C Road, Sheshadripuram,
Bangalore - 560 020.
Ph. : 080-41466009
E mail id – [email protected], [email protected]
INTRODUCTORY PROFILE
SAMRAKSHAN is a Bangalore, Karnataka based Environmental Engineering Consultancy
Company. SAMRAKSHAN is an off shoot of AQUATECH ENVIRO ENGINEERS, Bangalore.
We are leading solutions providers of B2B solutions in the field of Environment since two
decades. SAMRAKSHAN is a specialized solution providers, we serve varied industries like
Distillery, Sugar, Fertilizers, Pharmaceuticals, Power generation, Service industries,
Common waste disposal facilities etc.,
Professional Services Offered:
We under take works related to Pollution Control,
Environmental Impact Assessment studies, Preparation of Environmental Management plan, design and execution of Effluent / wastewater and water treatment plants, air pollution control and management, solid and hazardous waste management, Due-diligence studies. Assists clients for implementation of conditions stipulated in the Environmental
Clearances, Consent to Establish and consent to operate issued by the Regulatory agencies.
Assist clients in Environment related Project Management Consultancy. Imparting training to the industries for Environment regulatory compliances. Compliance report preparation. We also undertake assisting clients in techno-legal issues before the Hon’ble High Court,
NGT and Supreme Court etc.,
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 328 -
KEY PERSONNEL OF THE ORGANISATION:
M/s.Shilpa Medicare Limited, 100% EOU
Environmental Impact Assessment Report - 329 -