ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods...

11
ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood [email protected] www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/environment/civil- penalty/

Transcript of ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods...

Page 1: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

ENVIRONMENTALCIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach

Michael WoodsSenior AssociateStephenson [email protected]/laws/environment/civil-penalty/

Page 2: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

What is a Civil Penalty?• The traditional civil/criminal distinction

• Crime and punishment

• “A middle system of law”

• What it is not...

CivilPenalty

A discretionary monetary sum, imposed flexibly under civil law, achieving deterrence and reparation

Page 3: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

Regulatory Difficulties

• Over-reliance on criminal prosecution and strict liability

• Trivialisation of offences and inadequate fines

• Regulator reluctance to enforce?

Current

Optimal A more proportionate and responsive approach to regulation

Compliance through discretion and consensus, but…

Page 4: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

Current Use of Civil Penalties Abroad

•“Second order violations”

• Benefits recapture

• BEN and SEPs

Germany

•“Inflation” of the criminal law• Ordnungswidrigkeiten• The Öztürk case

USA

Page 5: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

Current Use of Civil Penalties in the UK

• Variety of models – growing interest

• Limitations of fixed penalties – inflexible

• OFT – CA 1988 and CAT

• Human Rights – Article 6 “criminal charges”

Page 6: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

Benefits from Environmental Civil Penalties

• Preserves the value of the criminal law• Relieves pressure on regulators’ resources• Improved understanding and compliance• Ability to target financial gains and losses• Addresses increased public expectations

Greater Flexibility

Better match between the sanction and moral/financial costs of the offence,leading to improved compliance

Result

Page 7: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

A Possible Model

• Environment Agency

When?

How?

What?

Who?

• IPPC, waste and water

• Discretion • Appeals

• Initial limited use• Later review and extension

Page 8: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

Report Conclusion

Outcome

• Current system: room for improvement

• Experience of civil penalties: pragmatic and effective

• Regulators and regulated: potentially favourable

Better regulation and a better environment

Page 9: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

Reactions

• Environment Agency • Environmental Audit Committee• Government (BRTF)

• Defra• Hampton Report • New legislation - Clean Neighbourhoods and Water Industry

UKELA? Model? Industry/NGO/public feedback? Lobbying?

Page 10: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

Issues for Discussion• Regulatory fit – alternative or replacement?

• Type of offences – low-level and/or high level?

• Which regulator(s) – EA, EN, local authorities • Assessing penalty – standard tariff and/or discretionary factors?

• Limits on discretion – statutory cap? not > criminal fine?

• Means of appeal – Magistrates, SoS, ET? plus limited JR?

• Which parties liable – companies, individuals, directors?

• Resources – additional funding and/or hypothecation?

On the principle? On the detail?Consensus?

Page 11: ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com.

ENVIRONMENTALCIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach

Michael WoodsSenior AssociateStephenson [email protected]/laws/environment/civil-penalty/