ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj...

24
Email : [email protected] Fax : +91 020 4381004 Web : www.mah.nic.in/cwprs CENTRAL WATER AND POWER RESEARCH STATION PUNE 411 024 ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON CHILIKA LAKE, ORISSA Sponsored by Chilika Development Authority

Transcript of ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj...

Page 1: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Email : [email protected] Fax : +91 020 4381004

Web : www.mah.nic.in/cwprs

CENTRAL WATER AND POWER RESEARCH STATION

PUNE 411 024

ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON

CHILIKA LAKE, ORISSA

Sponsored by

Chilika Development Authority

Page 2: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Schematic Diagram of hydrological set up

of Chilika lagoon

Page 3: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Studies carried out

Assessing environmental impact of

Naraj barrage

Requirement of fresh water for stability

of the new mouth

Page 4: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

21

22

25

23

20

1624

215

14

3

4

5

6

13

812

11

10

9

17

1819

Locations of Salinity measurement Stations

7

1

Page 5: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

0 5 10 15 20 25

(Grid spacing 25 meter)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 2

5 m

ete

r)

Locations of Tides and Velocity Observations

C2C6

C1C5

C9

C8

C4

C3

T2

T1

C7

Page 6: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

3 6 9 12 15 1821 24 27 30 m/s

Wind Rose Diagrams for calm period and

for Southwest monsoon of 2001

May - Sept

Frequency %

Jan- April

Page 7: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

3 6 9 12 15 1821 24 27 30

Wind Rose Diagram for Northeast monsoon of 2001

Oct – Dec

Frequency %

m/s

Page 8: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 10 100 1000 10000

Particle size (microns)

perc

enta

ge fin

er

d50=0.695mm Stn C1

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 10 100 1000 10000

Particle size (microns)

per

cen

tage

finer

d50=0.695mm Stn C7

Particle size distribution curves

Page 9: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Data Analysis

Maximum Tidal Level Fluctuation at Sipakuda,

Satpara and Magarmukh were 1.44 m, 0.5m and

0.28m respectively in 2002.

Average monthly salinity improved in Northern and

Central sectors, while it remained almost same in

Southern sector. During May, the variation was

recorded to be 5.2 to 35 ppt in the lagoon. There is

no major change in the monthly salinity at Nalaban

for the winter season (December to February)

varying between 5 to 7 ppt

Page 10: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Minimum cross sectional area of new

mouth was 1162.5 sq m in June 2002

with mean depth 2.5 m, while the

maximum was 1596 sq m in October,

2002 with mean depth 3.99m w.r.t high

water line.

Total tidal Prism at the inlet is of the

order of 27.5 MCM

Data Analysis

Continued….

Page 11: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Variation of area of cross section of New mouth

0.0

500.0

1000.0

1500.0

2000.0

2500.0

3000.0

3500.0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Time in Months

Are

a(m

2)

2002 2003 2004 2005

Comparison of cross sectional area & Variation of geometrical

properties of new mouth of Chilika Lake over the years

Data Analysis

Continued….

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Apr-01 Nov-01 May-02 Dec-02 Jun-03 Jan-04 Aug-04 Feb-05 Sep-05 Mar-06 Oct-06

Date and Time

Wid

th &

Are

a (S

I un

its)

-16.00

-14.00

-12.00

-10.00

-8.00

-6.00

-4.00

-2.00

0.00

Dep

th (

m)

Width Area Depth

Page 12: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Rainfall, mm (1982 – 2002) and Run-Off,

MCM ( 1972 – 2001) Assessment

Yearly Run-Off 4277 5339

Monsoon Run-Off 3887 4986

Run-Off Of Daya,

Makara and Bhargavi2948 4056

Yearly Rainfall 1326 1500

Monsoon Rainfall 1086 1200

Description Mean75% reliability of

non-exceedence

Page 13: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Comparison of Total Discharge at new mouth

for the month of July

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

8-Jul-01 13-Jul-01 18-Jul-01 23-Jul-01 28-Jul-01 2-Aug-01

Date

To

tal D

ischar

ge

(M c

um

)

Model Observed

Page 14: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Month

Dec-000

16

3.2

13

5.0

12

2.5

10

6.2

10

9.5

7.5

10.1

7.4

12.5

7

12.2

7

11.5

6.9

10.9

7.3

10.0

8.9

8.6

10.4

5.1

11.8

6.2

12

21.9

16.3

24.8

19.5

1.5

13.22

0.0

5.08

0.0

2.8

0.2

11.9

0.9

4.2

Jan-010.5

15.7

4.5

13.4

5.2

12.92

4.5

12

8.0

10.4

10.5

9.83

11.2

9.7

13.0

9.2

13.0

9.2

12.2

9.3

11.5

9.5

10.8

10.7

8.8

11.8

9.5

13.1

16.5

14.7

25.0

25.11

25.5

33

1.5

13.4

0.3

10.4

1.0

7.7

0.3

13.7

2.5

8.6

Feb-010.2

14.8

5.4

17.47

5.5

14.9

5.1

14.2

6.5

12.6

10.1

12.3

11.8

12.2

13.2

11.6

13.2

11.6

13.0

11.6

11.2

12.3

11.6

12.6

10.2

14.5

15.0

13.9

17.8

15.2

27.3

18.9

28.1

20.5

2.8

14.8

2.0

11.2

0.5

9.0

1.2

13.6

2.9

9.3

Mar-012.7

18.7

8.2

16.4

7.9

16.3

5.6

15.6

7.0

14.4

10.5

14.1

12.0

13.9

13.6

13.6

13.9

13.6

13.5

13.7

12.5

13.9

12.8

14.7

11.0

15.4

31.2

17.5

30.5

17.3

34.5

21

32.5

32.7

14.8

17.8

0.4

14.3

1.5

11.7

0.2

16.9

18.0

12.7

Apr-017.6

21

25.1

19.5

6.9

18.5

8.2

17.8

7.2

16.4

13.2

16.1

13.8

16.0

13.5

15.6

14.8

15.6

13.0

15.7

12.5

15.9

12.8

16.8

14.4

17.6

35.2

19

34.0

23

34.0

31.4

34.2

33

29.5

19.7

1.2

16.9

6.5

14.34

6.0

19.3

15.3

15.4

May-0131.2

21.8

20.8

19

11.0

19

13.0

19

12.5

18

20.4

18

20.0

18

16.1

18

16.5

17.8

16.1

18.1

18.4

18.4

16.1

17.9

24.5

20.0

35.8

23

33.7

29.6

--

32.9

--

33

34.2

22.2

21.2

21

30.0

17.3

26.2

21

33.2

18.5

ppt

Comparison of Salinity at various locations of the Chilika Lake

( Observed / Computed )

Page 15: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

SALINITY DISTRIBUTION UNDER OPTION-1

AT THE ENDS OF DIFFERENT MONTHS

Dec, 2000 Jan, 2001

Mar, 2001Feb, 2001

Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

12/31/00 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

01/31/01 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

02/28/01 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

03/31/01 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

Page 16: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

05/31/01 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

May, 2001

Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

09/30/01 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

Sep, 2001

SALINITY DISTRIBUTION UNDER OPTION-1

AT THE ENDS OF DIFFERENT MONTHS

Page 17: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

05/31/02 12:00:00, Time step: 0, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

May, 2002

Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

09/30/02 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

Sep, 2002

SALINITY DISTRIBUTION UNDER OPTION-1

AT THE ENDS OF DIFFERENT MONTHS

Page 18: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

05/31/01 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

May, 2001 Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

09/30/01 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

Sep, 2001

SALINITY DISTRIBUTION UNDER OPTION-III

AT THE ENDS OF DIFFERENT MONTHS

Page 19: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

05/31/02 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

May, 2002Palette

31 - 33

29 - 31

27 - 29

25 - 27

23 - 25

21 - 23

19 - 21

17 - 19

15 - 17

13 - 15

11 - 13

9 - 11

7 - 9

5 - 7

3 - 5

1 - 3

Below 1

Undefined Value

09/30/02 12:00:00, Time step: 1, Layer: 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

(Grid spacing 157.5 meter)

0

50

100

150

(Gri

d s

pa

cin

g 1

57

.5 m

ete

r)

Component 1

Sep, 2002

SALINITY DISTRIBUTION UNDER OPTION-III

AT THE ENDS OF DIFFERENT MONTHS

Page 20: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Option - I

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Oct-00 Jan-01 Apr-01 Jul-01 Nov-01 Feb-02 May-02 Sep-02 Dec-02

Month & Year

Sali

nit

y (

ppt)

Southern Control Northern Central

Option - III

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Oct-00 Jan-01 Apr-01 Jul-01 Nov-01 Feb-02 May-02 Sep-02 Dec-02

Month & Year

Sali

nit

y (

ppt)

Monthly Variation of Salinity at different sectors of Chilika Lake

Page 21: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Southern Sector

0

5

10

15

20

Oct-00 Apr-01 Nov-01 May-02 Dec-02

Sa

lin

ity

(p

pt)

Option I Option III

Control Section

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Oct-00 Apr-01 Nov-01 May-02 Dec-02

Sa

lin

ity

(p

pt)

Option I Option III

Northern Sector

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Oct-00 Apr-01 Nov-01 May-02 Dec-02

M o nt h & Y e ar

Sa

lin

ity

(p

pt)

Central Sector

0

5

10

15

20

25

Oct-00 Apr-01 Nov-01 May-02 Dec-02

Month & Year

Sa

lin

ity

(p

pt)

Comparisons of salinity for different scenarios of Chilika Lake

Page 22: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

No

of H

rs e

xist

ence

0.0

to 0

.2

0.2

to 0

.4

0.4

to 0

.6

0.6

to 0

.8

0.8

to 1

.0

0.0

to -

0.2

-0.2

to -

0.4

-0.4

to -

0.6

-0.6

to -

0.8

-0.8

to -

1.0

velocities (m/s)

Option III

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

No o

f H

rs e

xis

tence

0.0

to 0

.2

0.2

to 0

.4

0.4

to 0

.6

0.6

to 0

.8

0.8

to 1

.0

0.0

to -

0.2

-0.2

to -

0.4

-0.4

to -

0.6

-0.6

to -

0.8

-0.8

to -

1.0

velocities (m/s)

Option I

No of Hours of existence of velocities under different scenarios at inlet

Page 23: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0

Conclusions:

Chilika is a shallow, well-mixed vast lake. Tide induced

circulation is negligibly small. Wind plays dominant role in

circulation

Salinity is flushed out every year during South west monsoon

and it starts rising from January reaches its peak in the month

of May.

Major contribution of discharge is from Northern rivers

such as Bhargavi, Daya, Makara and Luna besides

contribution also through precipitation over the lake

Stability analysis of the inlet indicates inlet is bar bypassing

type. Formation of outer and inner bar persist.

To maintain salinity flushing characteristics of the lake,

Option III is adequate. In the absence of flash floods in

consecutive years, it will be necessary to deploy dredger to

remove submerged bars formed on the south side every

year during south west monsoon

Page 24: ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF NARAJ BARRAGE ON …iced.cag.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016-17/NTP 05/naraj barrage... · Variation of area of cross section of New mouth 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0