Entrevista Lethem Dick
-
Upload
ficci-orama -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of Entrevista Lethem Dick
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
1/21
The Library of America Interviews
Jonathan Lethem
about Philip K. Dick
In connection with the publication in May, 2007, of Philip K. Dick: Four
Novels of the 1960s, edited by Jonathan Lethem, Rich Kelley conducted this
exclusive interview for The Library of America e-Newsletter. You can sign up
for the monthly e-Newsletter at www.loa.org.
Of all the science fiction writers of the twentieth century, why is Philip K.
Dick the one whojudging from the reissue of his novels and the movies
made from his workhas most grabbed the popular imagination?
Hes popular in a different way than any other writer. I call him science
fictions Lenny Bruce. Coming out of the same tradition and using the same
materials as other science fiction writers, he was in a sense science fictions
answer to the Beat generation. He was the ultimate outsider, nonconformist,
dissident. At the time he entered the field, science fiction was preoccupied with
genuine scientific developments, space exploration boosterism, and a super-
rational cognition. Where everyone else was writing about extrapolation and
thinking hard about real possibilities, Dick was attuned to the unconscious, the
irrational, the paranoiac, the impulsive. His stories had a wildly hallucinatory
nature that he treated as if it were rational.
Now, the stories of the other science fiction writers were not as rational
as they claim. They were quite in the grip of a fabulating imagination or wish
fulfillment. They were writing fairy tales more than they acknowledge. But Dick
engaged in the most direct and distinctive way with the undertow of terror and
the irrational in contemporary technological society. Thats why science fictionwas important to begin with, because it addressed the fact that we were living
in a technocratic age when traditional arts, literary and otherwise, didnt have
much to say on this and didnt find a lot of vocabulary for acknowledging the
increasing rate of change and what it did to the experience of ordinary life.
Science fiction in its clumsy, mawkish, embarrassing way was taking the bull by
the horns.
1
Copyright 2007 The Library of America
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
2/21
Was he alone in this role or part of a movement?
Early on he was more or less properly understood to be of a piece with a
group of writers known as the Galaxywriters because that was the magazine in
which they published. Robert Sheckley, Frederick Pohl, Cyril Kornbluth, William
Tenn, and a number of other writers were nudging science fiction to a greateruse of satirical, social commentary. They used satire to expose some of the
traps, paradoxes, and perversities of consumer capitalism.
Dick did participate in this movement and he continued to be an acerbic
critic of late capitalism. He saw what the advertising age could do to
consciousness and in many ways he was extremely prescient on the subject of
the invasive power of Madison Avenue, the way it was shaping the entire culture.
What Dick did was to take this movements tendencies toward social
criticism and add to them this almost unbearably personal, emotional, intimate
quality. His characters dont just live in these paranoid futures. They are utterlyat the mercy of them. As absurd and surreal as the images and ideas in Dicks
books could sometimes be, he always took them seriously. The predicaments of
his characters were never funny to him. They were overwhelmingly terrifying
and important. Thats what makes him so distinct, not only from other science
fiction writers, but also from other postmodern satirical writers that he could
be associated with, writers like Thomas Pynchon, Kurt Vonnegut, Donald
Barthelme, and Richard Brautigan, all of whom also worked with absurdist and
fantastic materials. Dick commits to his visions with an emotional intensity
unlike any other writer. He digs deeper and makes a life or death commitment to
the situations in his novels. His books always have this doubleness. Theres a
layer of satirical or fantastical inventivenesshes one of the great idea men of
all literary historybut theres also this personal emotional stake. Hes always
putting everything he has at risk. The characters are deeply vulnerable, deeply
flawed, and at the mercy of their situations.
Is this because theres less of a separation between Dick and his
characters?
There is very little separation between Dick and his characters. This
goes back to the sense that Dick was a writer who in his process was impulsive,he was explosive, he was prolific and he was not utterly in control. And this is
the reason theres variation in the prose and is also the reason why some
people find his writing awkward in some ways. He was writing with a kind of
personal visionary intensity that didnt make time for some of the niceties,
some of the second thoughts and revisions that you might wish a literary writer
to be able to make.
Jonathan Lethem on Philip K. Dick
2
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
3/21
Many writersRobert Heinlein, Stephen Kingget this criticism: that their
ideas and plots are better than their writing. Yet Dicks prose seems to
have a special charge.
Hes such a deeply humane and intelligent writer, so committed, that the
prose conveys a tremendous amount of meaning, even at its most awkward. Iwould say quite happily that the four books collected in Four Novels of the 1960s
are among the most fully realized, the least infelicitous of his books. Ubik, which
may be his singular masterpiece, has in its earliest chapters some wheel-
spinning, some time-wasting material that can be a bit offputting to the
uninitiated reader. And this isnt to apologize for this but to acknowledge it and
just say this is there. For this reason Ive often had the experience in
recommending Dicks work to someone, that the second book they read is their
favorite. Forever. Whatever the second one is. They read one and say Oh, this is
a little odd, this is a little bumpy. I want to read more. Then they somehow shiftinto the gear he is working in and they become a devoted fan, the second one in.
Are these Dicks four best novels?
Its quite important to note that this volume is structured as Novels of the
1960s, which was my wish for a number of reasons. First and foremost, I want to
leave room for Novels of the 1970sthere are at least three or four novels from
that decade that would make a superb companion volume. If I had been forced
to make a single volume representing the entirety of his career, it wouldnt
necessarily have been these four books. If you had to pick a single decade to
represent his work, the 1960s is the one to pick. That is the summit, but in that
decade there are at least four other novels every bit the equal of the four here:
Dr. Bloodmoney, Now Wait for Last Year, A Maze of Death, and probably the book
that came closest to being included, Martian Time Slip. These are all superb
novels, singular and fully realized and all from the 1960s, an incredibly prolific
decade in which he wrote another ten or twelve books.
This volume is set up with the best introductory book by far. The Man in
the High Castle is the first book and that is a very happy arrangement. The
chronology demanded it but its perfect. Its the book that draws people in and
its the most embracing, particularly for a non-genre reader. It is also a work ofextraordinarily passionate and scrupulous scholarship. This is not the
daydream of someone whos just wondered what if the Nazis won the war. All of
the minor Nazi characters are thoroughly researched. Dick has written this
almost scholarly alternate reality.
3
Jonathan Lethem on Philip K. Dick
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
4/21
How do you account for his tremendous output? Was it just the speed?
He certainly took a lot of amphetamines. Thinking about Dick
biographically and thinking about his habits as a writer can be quite fascinating
and perplexing because no one fact could ever account for the torrential quality
of his work. There are several things you can point toall partial explanations.Amphetamines is one. There is also something very interesting to think about in
terms of his life. It can only be a speculation. He died eventually of a stroke. And
its likely he suffered other near-stroke experiences in the preceding years, but
there is some reason to wonder if he suffered from a rare neurological disorder
called temporal lobe epilepsy, which has associated with it involuntary and
overwhelming visionary experiences, and graphomaniafrantic writing,
compulsive writing. There is no way ever to ascertain this theoretical diagnosis
and I wouldnt want to sound too certain about it. But its very interesting to
compare him with other famous cases of temporary lobe epilepsy. Because thereare some striking similarities. And if you want to make some speculative
diagnoses, there are connections you can make with other famous mystics and
religious visionaries who are famous for their obsessive writing. St. Theresa of
Avila is one. She saw extraordinary visions and then spent years scribbling
endless explanations of these visions in fits of graphomania. Dick is a very
provocative figure to think of in these terms. Hes an exemplary character for the
strange, auto-didactical intensity of his work
You say that he was one of the Galaxy writers. Was that the onlypublication that responded to his work at the time he was writing?
He was placing stories in a great variety of magazines in the early and
mid-1950s. He was seen as a wunderkind at that point. He was part of the
second generation of great American science fiction pulp writers and the only
thing he didnt manage to doand its interesting to wonder if it would have
changed his approach and what would have happened if he didwas to place a
lot of stories with Astounding, which was seen as the leading magazine of the
time and had a very brilliant and imperious editor, John W. Campbell. To place a
story with Campbell was seen in science fiction circles as being analogous toplacing a story with The New Yorker. It was the place to be published and Dick,
for a number of complicated reasons, did not break into that market and didnt
receive the cultivation that Campbell gave to his writers. Isaac Asimov was the
principal exemplar of the Campbell style and Campbells protg. Looking at it
now, you would say this was a slightly old-fashioned, more optimistic style.
Campbells counterpart at Galaxywas Horace Gold, who was more literary. He
Jonathan Lethem on Philip K. Dick
4
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
5/21
was a New York Jew, and perhaps less sold on the great bold technocratic future
of this country, more inclined to notice the undertones and mixed messages.
In your essay forBookforum , You Dont Know Dick, you recount your
youthful experiences tracking down rare out-of-print copies of Dickpaperbacks in used bookstores in Brooklyn. Someone discovering Dick for
the first time in the Library of America edition is clearly going to have
quite a different experience.
Its an amazing thing to think about: the journey that this writer has
taken. You cant help but wish that he could somehow know this is happening.
It is a tremendous thought that hell be received by readers whose expectations
are canonical by definition.
The conditions of my discovery of his work are very much timebound.
This was the late 1970s and early 1980s. We lived in a different, much lessDickian world then. Whats extraordinary about his work at the moment is how
incredibly relevant it can seem and how much the world has caught up with
him. Thats true in a general sense. The iconography of science fiction, the
kinds of materials and images and kinds of metaphors he was exploring are
quite commonplace in the culture now. Everyone is up to speed on what an
android is. Its not exotic. Its a question of whether you do something
interesting with it. No ones going to be overwhelmed, or struck, or confused or
put off. Its simply part of the vocabulary of culture. And that was not true thirty
or forty years ago. But also in intensely particular and peculiar ways Dicksvisionsthough he wasnt interested in being a predictive writer, and he wasnt
systematically trying to be predictive in his extrapolationshis instincts about
where the media, where commercial culture were headed were unerring. We live
in a world precisely full of the kind of invasive, mind-colonizing advertising,
viral marketing notions that he predicted when it seemed absurd to do so. We
really live in his universe, in his brain in a way. Its not just that now hes going
to be in a Library of America edition. Someone coming to read his work now for
the first time will feel bewildered by the copyright dates on these books. They
will be reading so much about the world we live in, in a peculiar and weird form,but finding it utterly relevant and fresh.
You say Dick did not see himself as a predictor of the future. What was
Dicks vision of himself?
His image of himself as a working artist is a very complicated question.
He had tremendous and thwarted aspirations to be recognized as a literary
5
Jonathan Lethem on Philip K. Dick
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
6/21
writer and he considered himself a failed writer in that regard. Yet in other ways
he felt that he had accomplishedand I think rightlygreat things in this
despised form and that they had gone unrecognized. He alternates between
thinking that he lost his chance and that he had seized his chance but that no
one knew. At other times he was defiantly proud of the genre of science fictionand felt it was an antidote to the conformity, the blandness and the tendency of
the mainstream not to examine the status quo. He felt like a rebel and was
proud to be one. He was not particularly interested in some of the usual things
that science fiction was thought to be meant to do, like prepare people for the
future or predict the future. He was a fantasist and a storyteller and his
extrapolations were satirical ones of the present rather than predictions. Yet
paradoxically, in their accuracy, their vividness, the hints of the reality he saw
embedded in the world of the 1950s and 1960s, by extrapolating and satirizing
them, he did accurately predict the future quite neatly.
Did Dick see himself as a stylistic innovator?
I think the radicalism in his work does not operate in the way writers or
critics usually think of as style, which is to say, the choices made sentence by
sentence. But there is a formal radicalism to his work in the way he structured
his novels, the way he composed scenes, the way he advances stories, the way
he conflates disparate kinds of material, different tones like despair and satire
thats the level at which there is a conscious and proud experimental, radical,
innovative effort being made. Its not exactly what one normally thinks of as
style. Its more a matter of form and motif.
Did Dick consider himself part of an American tradition of fantastic
writing, dating back to H. P. Lovecraft?
Its almost a parallel formation in American fantastic writing. When, in the
mid-1930s, science fiction writers began to articulate the genre, they derived
some strength from their comradeship or their awareness of the Lovecraftian
horror and fantasy writers. They also defined themselves somewhat in
opposition. Fantasy was a dark and dreamlike kind of writing and the science
fiction writers thought they were doing a lucid and optimistic kind of writing.This opposition may not seem so simple in retrospect. They were allied
traditions, allied by their distance from the mainstream of literary credibility.
They were also opposed to one another at certain fundamental levels.
Dick never made any specific comments about Lovecraft that Im aware of.
There are some deep native tendencies they have in common. Dick dabbled in
what the science fiction writers of the time considered the fantasy genre two or
Jonathan Lethem on Philip K. Dick
6
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
7/21
three times. There is one novel, The Cosmic Puppets, and several quite
accomplished short storiesin particular, The King of the Elves and The
Father Thingwhere Dick is deliberately writing as a fantasy or horror writer
rather than as a science fiction writer. Dick would have seen these as a conscious
migration across a membrane into another field of operations. These traditionsnow seem so interrelated that these distinctions dont seem that important.
Dick is so popular with filmmakers now. At the time he was working many
science fiction writersRay Bradbury, Rod Serlingwere having
teleplays produced on television. Did Dick ever try this?
That was a ticket he could never buy for himself. He tried a few times.
Because for a starving artist as he was it seemed like it might be a meal ticket.
But he didnt have the ability to shoehorn his wild visionary style into a 30-
minute television format. His few attempts were charmingly hopeless. He onlywrote one screenplay, an adaptation of Ubik. Again, it was charmingly hopeless.
It could never have been filmed in the form he wrote it. In his papers were found
a few synopses for TV shows where he was obviously trying to market himself.
Theyre much too interesting and eclectic and too full of stuff. His principal
misunderstanding is that he couldnt simplify to the level he would have had to.
Theyre quite overcomplicated and brilliant and nothing like the 1960s science
fiction television that we remember.
The Library of America volume includes your notes. May we assume that
nothing like these appeared in the original novels, no translations of
foreign phrases?
Yes, the notes are all brand new and the phrases were untranslated in
previous editions. I added a few cultural references. Some things I never
completely understood and some things seemed quite specific and needed
explication. Just as a Dickens novel has to be annotated for things that would
have been completely lucid to readers of his time, these are starting to be older
novels and there are some cultural references the reader might like some help
identifying. Radio comedians of the 1930s might have seemed easy names to
drop in the 1960s. Fifty years from now we can hope Jim Carrey will be a difficultname to recall.
7
Jonathan Lethem on Philip K. Dick
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
8/21
Copyright 2009 The Library of America
1
The Library of America interviews
Jonathan Lethem about
Philip K. Dicks Later Novels
In connection with the publication in Summer 2009 of Philip K. Dick: VALIS
and Later Novels, edited by Jonathan Lethem, Rich Kelley conducted this
exclusive interview for The Library of America e-Newsletter.
(Click here to read the previous interview with Jonathan Lethem, conductedin May 2007 on the occasion of the publication of the first Philip K. Dick
volume published in The Library of America.)
Sign up for the free monthly e-Newsletter at www.loa.org.
VALIS and Later Novels, the third Library of America volume of novels by
Philip K. Dick, collects A Maze of Death (1970) and his last three novels,VALIS (1981), The Divine Invasion (1982), and The Transmigration of
Timothy Archer(1982). What connects these four novels and how do they
differ from his earlier work?
The latter three are his last three composed novels, and the last three
published during his lifetime. Theyre most strongly linked for that reason, even
beyond the deep thematic crosscurrents among them, and its worth pointing
out that nowhere else in the LOA volumes have I happened to select three
books in a row from this very, very prolific writer. These three have come to be
known as The VALIS Trilogy, a notion Dick consented to at least in passing(though he was awfully prone to contradicting himself on such matters), and
theyre all closely related to the background of theological study and specula-
tion that dominated the latter part of his life. Lets get back to this aspect of his
work later.
A Maze of Death is a significantly earlier novel, and somewhat of a dark
horse in generalrarely listed among his greatest by critics, or heavily studied
http://www.loa.org/volume.jsp?RequestID=305http://www.loa.org/volume.jsp?RequestID=305http://www.loa.org/volume.jsp?RequestID=305http://www.loa.org/volume.jsp?RequestID=305http://www.loa.org/volume.jsp?RequestID=252http://www.loa.org/volume.jsp?RequestID=252http://www.loa.org/volume.jsp?RequestID=305http://www.loa.org/volume.jsp?RequestID=305http://www.loa.org/volume.jsp?RequestID=252 -
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
9/21
2
Lethem on Philip K. Dick (Later Novels)
in academia. Its probably the furthest afield Ive gone from the canon within
Dicks work, apart from Now Wait For Last Year. Aside from the fact that I like it
a lot, I chose it for the relationship to these later books, which are too often
taken as an anomalous part of Dicks career by those who favor the 1960s work.
In Maze we see Dick exploring motifs of paranoid theology (to coin a phrase),
many years before his interest in these matters is supposed to have begun. And
then theres the luckan editors luck, Id call itof the mention of Bishop Pike
in the authors note, which seems to tie things together.
As with Ubik and Eye in the Sky, A Maze of Death uses the classic science
fiction motif of following a group of colonists arriving on a planet and
being tested physically, psychologically, and philosophically by their expe-
riences. But its also equal parts murder mystery and cosmic meditation.
How would you compare what Dick accomplishes here with his other
efforts with this plot device?
Yes, in some ways it makes a third entry in a secret trilogy of novels, does-
nt it? The design is reminiscent of Agatha Christies archetypal And Then There
Were None. And if Eye is the friskiest and freshest version, typical of Dick at the
start of his career, and Ubik the most committed and somber and disorienting,
characteristic of his 60s peak,Maze may in some ways signal a degree of exhaus-
tion and cynicism in his approachthough the book is nothing if not mordantly
hilarious. Several critics have pointed out that it appears that Dick is attempting
to do away with his usual cast of characters, as if hes frustrated with themnot
unlike Kurt Vonnegut in Breakfast of Champions. In both cases the writer in ques-
tion would never write in exactly the same way again afterwards.
The narrator in VALIS delivers the disturbing and often-quoted line, It is
sometimes an appropriate response to reality to go insane. He then says,
I am Horselover Fat, and I am writing this in the third person to gain
much-needed objectivity. But he doesnt write in the third person. The I
converses with Horselover Fat and together they explore the concept of aVast Active Living Intelligence System, or VALIS. Does Dick want us to
believe that the narrator is insaneor is this dual-personality Dicks way
of getting the many contradictory voices inside his head into the novel? Its
unsettling and oddly intimate at the same time.
Well, Im not sure I can account for the skewed narrative strategies in the
book any better than youve just done, but unsettling and intimate are cer-
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
10/21
Lethem on Philip K. Dick (Later Novels)
3
tainly good words for it. Whats amazing is how natural the method can seem to
a sympathetic reader whos not struggling to find some framework for the
approachits more than intimate, Id call it weirdly congenial. And, of course,
as a method for drawing us into material thats more than outlandish in its con-
spiratorial and reality-shattering implications, its terrifically sly. Dick disarms
our skepticism by outflanking it: you sometimes find yourself rooting for
Horselover Fat to prove the narrator wrong.
You mention in your notes that Dick wrote VALIS in a mere two weeks in
November 1978, but its composition had a longer foreground and that it
incorporates material that Dick has rehearsed in his Exegesis, an exten-
sive journal project. I gather that the Exegesis spanned some 8,000
pages upon Dicks death. How does the material in it differ from what he
includes in his novels? Is VALIS the only novel that includes work from it?
Will all of it ever be published?
To take the simplest question first: VALIS is the only novel that includes
language from the 8,000 (largely handwritten, unstructured, repetitive, digres-
sive, and often dull) pages called the Exegesisand, in their clarity and com-
pression, these passages are far from typical of the whole. Some other (still
comparatively finished) sequences from those pages are collected in In Pursuit
of VALIS, edited by Dick biographer Lawrence Sutin. The challenges in organizing
and transcribing the lions share of this material are being slowly approached by
the Dick estate, with the help of some conservators and scholars, even as we
speak. So, if youre really excited about the prospect of reading the entirety, for
the first time theres a project to root for. But be warned: it shows no prospect
of being some lost masterwork, nor even particularly readable.
Anyone hearing the plot of The Divine InvasionA hapless recluse shep-
herds the MS-afflicted virgin mother of Yahwehs son to Earth so that he
can reclaim Earth from the evil Belial, but the savior is born with amne-
sia . . .would suspect this to be a comic novel. Yet Dick writes this sequelto VALIS in full earnest. Dorion Sagan has hailed it as having instanti-
ated Gnosticism in fiction with entertainment and story-telling acumen,
imparting lodes of theological information along the way where others
have failed. Do you see Dick the philosopher and Dick the storyteller
being in harmony here or at odds?
Lets call it a high-wire act. I do think theres a fascinating tension as Dick
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
11/21
4
Lethem on Philip K. Dick (Later Novels)
attempts to ground so much of his obsessive theological material in terms that
(somewhat) resemble his indigenous storytellers instincts, and most particu-
larly in the pop-iconography of his science fiction. Whats so interesting to me
is how little Divine Invasion really resembles Dicks own SFits more like an
image of how his work might have developed if hed been more committed and
lucid in his use of those materials all along. Thats to say, in reaching for an ade-
quate container for the VALIS materials in this, his third attempt (thats count-
ing Radio Free Albemuth, which well get to), hes begun to remember the kind
of more grounded and prosaic fiction hed set out to write in the 1950sthe
realist novels. And this reaches an even fuller fruition with The Transmigration
of Timothy Archer.
Many articles have been written about Dicks fascination with Gnosticism.
The term Gnosticism encompasses the beliefs of many Judaeo-Christian
sects from the first centuries of the Common Era. Most of them share a
belief in what William Irwin Thompson calls an inversion of Hebrew
mythology where the world is created by a demiurge and the serpent in
the garden is the Savior. Gnostic elements recur in VALIS and The Divine
Invasion. Was Dick any more committed to Gnostic beliefs than he was to
Taoism (with his frequent use of the I Ching) or Buddhism or Hinduism?
A discussion of Gnosticism is where, alas, you plumb very definite limits
in my knowledge. Most of what I know about Gnosticism I learned through the
very peculiar means of reading Dicks novels, his letters, and the studies of his
work that bring that information to bear on it. Dicks commitment is another
matterno testimony has ever persuaded me that his commitment to a given
belief system was ever embracing or permanentit seems he tried them on and
off as frequently as he changed clothes. I didnt know Dick personally, but from
the accounts of his friends and family, it wasnt any easier to pin him down in
person than it is as a reader.
The Transmigration of Timothy Archer is unusual in several ways: Wheremost of Dicks novels follow the stories of several characters via a third
person narrator, Transmigration tells its story through a single narrative
voiceand its female. Why did Dick chose this form for his last novel?
He barely ever used the first-person voice. The only other prominent
example is VALIS, where that use is, as youve pointed out, deeply complicated.
Dicks notion of what fiction could do, what it was meant to do, was tied up in
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
12/21
Lethem on Philip K. Dick (Later Novels)
5
the idea of multiple subjective perspectives on reality. Transmigration is a great
last-minute departure and, I believe, a triumph of both craft and wisdom
grace, if you will. How in the world he arrived at this simple formal choice,
which enabled the book in so many ways, is a complete mystery to me.
Certainly the narrator is one of his greatest characters, bar none, and the fact
that shes female is a real gift for those readers uncomfortable with Dicks depic-
tions of women even in some of his finest works (there are many of us).
The Episcopal Bishop of California, James A. Pike, was a close friend of
Dicks andTransmigration is based in part on Pikes life. A charismatic tele-
vangelist, Pike famously died searching for Gnostic scrolls in the Israeli
desert in 1969. What drew the two men together and why did Dick choose to
use Pike for a basis of a character more than a decade after Pikes death?
From what I understand there were very few conversationalists who
could fully contend with Dicks full obsessional outpouring of scholarship,
imaginative leaps, and bullshit gambits; James Pike was obviously one who
could, and so it was a match made in heaven. As for Dicks decision to portray
him in a roman clef, I cant testify as to Dicks thinking, but in a sense such a
choice is a fairly typical one for a 20th-century novelist (think, for instance, of
Saul Bellow, whose sources for characters among his most charismatic and
famous acquaintances are often very easily discernible). So, perhaps we can
agree that this was Dick reaching for a relatively traditional method.
Some time over the next year a new movie, Radio Free Albemuth, starring
Alanis Morissette, is due to be released. The movie is based on a novel Dick
wrote before VALIS and originally entitled VALISystemA (it was published
after his death as Radio Free Albemuth). The novel VALIS includes refer-
ences to a science fiction movie Valis, which recapitulates the plotline
of Radio Free Albemuth. Did Dick intend for all of these works to be inter-
twined? Can you help us sort the threads?
Im not familiar with the movie project, apart from what youve heard, soI cant predict how faithful or satisfying it might be for readers of VALIS or the
other related works. The novel that the movie takes as its source, Radio Free
Albemuth, is an odd duck in Dicks shelf of published works in the sense that it
was actually an earlier draft of the VALISmaterial, submitted for publication by
Dick and then reworked so completely in the writing of VALIS that it appeared
to his posthumous editors as a legitimate work of its own. It has champions
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
13/21
6
Lethem on Philip K. Dick (Later Novels)
some who even prefer it to VALIS. I cant agree, myself. It seems a fairly pedes-
trian and cautious feint at the materialreadable, perhaps, but not essential.
VALIS, meanwhile, is one of Dicks great masterpieces, so Im awfully glad that
Radio Free Albemuth was written, if only to be rejected and rewritten.
You have a new novel coming this fall, Chronic City , and many of its
themesparanoia, drug use, alternate realitiesecho those of Dick more
than any of your recent novels. Did editing the three Library of America
volumes influence your writingor is Dicks influence like a centrifugal
force that becomes simply irresistible at some point?
Good spotting. Ive certainly had a very full refresher course in Philip K.
Dick over these last few years, and thats unmistakably had its effect on Chronic
City, yes. Yet I think your image of a centrifugal influence is also right, and it
feels to me that Id been swinging back in this direction for a long whileandId conceived of many of the images and sequences that would become Chronic
City as much as ten years ago. The odd thing about writing novels if you write
them as slowly as I do (as opposed to the breakneck speed of Phil Dick) is that
you often can barely remember their point of origin by the time youve finished
them.
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
14/21
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
15/21
Jonathan, the five novels in Philip K. Dick: Five Novels of the 1960s & 70s
were written between 1962 and 1977. During that time Dick wrote some 20
other novels, including those collected in Philip K. Dick: Four Novels of the
1960s. Why did you choose these five for this second collection?
Lethem: If there is a loose canon of eight or ten novels within Dicksenormous list of titles, most critics and scholars would agree that the splendid
Martian Time-Slip, Dr. Bloodmoney, A Scanner Darkly, and Flow My Tears are as
near to the center of it as the four books I selected for the first volume. Each of
those four has its detractors as wellits in Dicks nature that each of the
novels is imperfect. Martian Time-Slip and Dr. Bloodmoney, though written in
the same period as the first volumes Man in the High Castle and Three Stigmata,
were, unlike those two books, published as paperback originals, and so their
profile was a little lower. But over time their excellence has become unmistak-
able. Paperback-original publication exemplified Dicks marginal fate as a writer,so to see these titles in the LOA provides perhaps an even deeper vindication
of his career. A Scanner Darklyand Flow My Tears were published later, each in
hardcover, and were each received with a measure of genuine critical acclaim,
as well as with relief. By then, Dick not only had growing cachet as a cult author,
but was also seen as resurgent after a period of wasted years. The jury for the
1975 John W. Campbell Memorial Award gave Flow My Tears one of Dicks few lit-
erary awards.
The dark horse in this second volume is Now Wait for Last Year. The book
is a personal favorite of mine, and Im not completely alone in championing it as
a major work. But it was largely rejected by the SF reviewers at the time of pub-
lication, and its reputation never completely recovered from that attack. The
book shows some signs, especially in the early going, of the slipshod construc-
tion and unrevised prose that dogged Dick throughout the 1960s, but the human-
ity in the novel runs very deep, and by the second half I think the book has
asserted itself as a tour de forceundeniable on its own (very unusual) terms.
All nine of the novels in the two LOA collections have a somewhat similar
length, each running more or less 200 pages. What determined the length
of Dicks novels? Was it the paperback format he was writing for?
Lethem: Thats a good guess in some cases, though it was also typical of
the length of material that a writer could push out in the sort of exhausting
dash-to-the-finish-line, often fueled by amphetamine abuse, that was typical of
Dicks manner of work. Then again, its worth crediting the fabulous results, and
giving Dick credit as a conscious artistthese novels attain a very complete
and satisfying relationship of form to material at the length they were written,
Interview with Leslie and Lethem
2
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
16/21
so who are we to guess that they might have been, or ought to have been, any-
thing other?
Laura, if I follow the chronology in the LOA volume and in Divine
Invasions , Lawrence Sutins biography of your father, you were born in1960, your father separated from your mother when you were three and it
wasnt until 1977, some 17 years later, that you were able to spend any
extended period of time with him, yet you remained close because you
were in constant communication through letters and phone calls. Is that
an accurate description? How did you manage to stay so close?
Leslie: My father and mother did separate when I was three. For a variety
of reasons including periods of chaos in my fathers personal life, his own emo-
tional challenges, and geographic separation, we saw each other only a few times.
When I was 12, my father reached out to me via a wonderful letter and webegan corresponding and talking on the phone regularly until his death in 1982.
He wrote incredible letters, sending me envelope after envelope filled with
pages typed single-space, sharing what was going on in his life and his latest
writing project.
Although we were physically separated there was an intimacy to our rela-
tionship that at the time I took for granted. Thinking about it now, I marvel at
the closeness I felt between us. His letters made me feel special and loved. I
knew he thought and cared about me. The tone of his letters was at times child-
ishly playful but he also wrote to me in adult terms about adult issues. In many
ways, he was like a close friend and confidant as well as a dad.
The notes for 1978 in the LOA Chronology say that your father is thrilled
when daughters Laura and Isa finally meet. You were 18 then and Isa 11.
Do you remember the circumstances of that meeting and how you felt?
Leslie: My sister, Isa, and I met at the memorial service for our fathers
mother, our Grandmother Dorothy. Isa was absolutely adorable and I cherished
my little sister from the moment I met her. We have been very close ever since.
She is a very important part of my life and the best thing about being Philip K.
Dicks daughter is that I have this wonderful sister.
The works collected here were written between 1962 and 1977. What can
you tell us about your fathers writing habits during that time?
Leslie: I can only tell you what my mother told me. She lived with my
father from 1959 until 1963. My father liked to write at night and might write
through the entire night, typing furiously. At that time he was writing so fast
3
Interview with Leslie and Lethem
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
17/21
that he might finish a novel in as little as two weeks, writing night and day.
Because my mother brought her three daughters with her into their marriage
and my birth added a fourth, she wanted to have a more traditional family life
where my father worked during the day and then joined her and the girls for a
family dinner. At her urging, while they were married, he changed his writinghabits to accommodate his new family life.
Jonathan, this reminds me of what Thomas M. Disch once wrote. As you
know, Disch was a fellow underappreciated science fiction writer and a
good friend of Dicks. In 1982, the year Dick died, Disch founded The Philip
K. Dick Award for the best original work of science fiction published in
paperback in the previous year and the Philip K. Trust has been support-
ing this award since 2005. In his introduction to Solar Lottery and Other
Works , Disch noted that Dick was more an improviser than a composerand that he made his experience of the creative act the focus of his art
with no turning back to rethink, rewrite, or erase. Do you find this descrip-
tion accurate and is this what explains the uncanny phenomenon of Dick
churning out 140 pages of Flow My Tears in 48 hours?
Lethem: I think Dischs description is an apt and lovely one, and captures
one of the pleasures of Dicks work that can be most elusive and difficult to
quantifythe pervasive sense that his writing was affectively reciprocalthat
is, the writer seems to be overwhelmingly, emotionally altered by his workby
the process of discovering the fates of his invented characters during the
process of its composition, leaving evidence of this trail of empathic intensity
everywhere in the pages.
Laura, the months of February and March 1974 are known to mark a
major turning point in your fathers life. What can you tell us about what
happened during that period?
Leslie: My father did not share this experience with me in his letters from
that period or in our phone conversations of the time.
Jonathan, the Chronology in the volume notes that in February and March
of 1974 Dick experienced a vision that obsessed him for the remaining
eight years of his life. One of the novels included here, A Scanner Darkly,
was written after this experience. Did Dicks writing change after 1974?
Lethem: It certainly did, and Scanner reflects his altered perspective in
some degreebut together with Flow My Tears, Scannerforms a watershed, or
perhaps a bridge, between the earlier style and the spiritual and autobiograph-
Interview with Leslie and Lethem
4
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
18/21
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
19/21
Leslie: I cant speak about other peoples experiences meeting my father
for the first time. I can only speak about my own experiences with my father.
When I was very little he did seem big and imposing, with a big booming
voice. As an adult, when I visited him in Santa Ana, I found he wasnt much taller
than I was at five foot seven. He didnt seem imposing or big then. Finally, whenI saw him in the hospital, after his stroke, he had worked very hard to lose
weight for an upcoming trip to France. He seemed to me to be much reduced;
while not frail, he was no longer a robust man.
In a 2006 interview Richard Linklater, director of the movie version of A
Scanner Darkly, quotes you and your sister, Isa, as saying in one of your
meetings: You know, if it wasnt for drugs, our dad would still be writing
today, instead of dying in 1982. Did you ever have any discussions with
your father about his use of drugs?Leslie: I was very much in the dark about my fathers use of drugs until I
read Paul Williamss article in Rolling Stone [The Most Brilliant SF Mind on Any
Planet] in 1975.
We never spoke about this directly. When I was an adult, after he had put
drugs behind him, he did periodically refer to his prior drug use in a historical way.
There have been many movies made of your fathers works: Total Recall,
Blade Runner, Impostor, Minority Report, Paycheck, A Scanner Darkly, Next.
Which of those do you think captures your fathers work most faithfully?
Leslie: The film that captures my fathers work most faithfully is A
Scanner Darklywhile Blade Runner, although not as faithful to the novel itself,
captures the spirit of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, exploring the ques-
tion of what makes us human.
Have you licensed any other works for movies that we should be looking
forward to?
Leslie: There are actually quite a few projects in the works. Several years
ago, before we formed ESP, Dale Rosenbloom and John Alan Simon acquired the
rights to Radio Free Albemuth, Valis, and Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said. The
first film, Radio Free Albemuth, written and directed by Simon and starring
Alanis Morissette, is now in post production.
ESP is producing with HBO and Picturehouse a biopic, The Owl in
Daylight, with Paul Giamatti as the lead actor and producer and with Tony
Grisoni ( Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas ) scripting. Disney/Pixar recently
announced plans to adapt The King of the Elves as an animated film to be
Interview with Leslie and Lethem
6
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
20/21
released in 2012. And we recently entered into a first look arrangement with
The Halcyon Company (producers of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles)
and hope to be making an announcement soon related to that.
In an interview on NPR you once said that youve read all of your fathers44 novels and 120 or so short stories. Are there any passages that have a
special resonance for you as his daughter?
Leslie: Identifying particular passages that resonate for me has always
been a challenge. Every novel includes so much autobiographical information
that I relate to his books in a different way than I do to any other author.
Reading my fathers work, recognizing the characters and the settings, results
in a unique dynamic. The issues he explores remind me of the time in his life
when he wrote the novel and what was going on with him then. Some of his
themes are so familiar that I joke that they are in my DNA. (I thought everyonesfamily talked about alternate realities and was very anxious when Nixon was
elected.)
However, I do really appreciate and enjoy the advertisements for Ubik at
the beginning of each chapter of that book. I love the concept of the Penfield
Mood Organ in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? I find The Three Stigmata
of Palmer Eldritch and Ubik to be really frightening. Reading A Scanner Darkly
makes me incredibly sad for my father, knowing that this depicts a really dark
time in his life. These are just a few points of connection with my fathers works;
I could go on and on.
Laura, what do you think your fathers reaction would be to having his
novels collected in these editions published by The Library of America?
Leslie: Ive made it a policy never to speak for my father and never to
speculate on what he would have thought. However, in this case, I know with
certainty that my father would have been elated and extremely proud. Having
his works included in the LOA would have been a defining moment in his life as
an author.
My father longed for literary recognition his entire adult life. Living in
Berkeley, he was surrounded by literary figures who dismissed SF as a worth-
less genre. In addition, he was very poor and found that he had a special knack
for turning out SF short stories so quickly that he was able to earn a living being
paid pennies per page. Writing to make money instead of to create art was
frowned upon then. He was doubly damned: for his chosen genre and for the
speed with which he cranked out stories and novels.
Recognition was a lifelong dream my father harbored until his death. For
7
Interview with Leslie and Lethem
-
8/7/2019 Entrevista Lethem Dick
21/21