ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of...

46
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 436 223 JC 990 693 TITLE Retention, Graduation and Transfer Rates at Maryland Community Colleges. INSTITUTION Maryland State Higher Education Commission, Annapolis. PUB DATE 1997-06-00 NOTE 88p. PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) Reports - Research (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academic Achievement; *Academic Persistence; Black Students; College Freshmen; *Community Colleges; Educational Attainment; *Full Time Students; *Graduation; *School Holding Power; Student Educational Objectives; Student Placement; Tables (Data); *Transfer Students; Two Year Colleges IDENTIFIERS *Maryland ABSTRACT This report contains the second, third, and fourth year retention, transfer, and graduation patterns at each Maryland public community college for all first-time, full-time students and African-American first-time, full-time students for the entering classes from 1985 to 1994. The following highlights are presented: the four-year success rates of new full-time freshmen, measured by the percentage of those earning a degree or certificate or transferring to a public four-year campus, has steadily declined since 1989. The same pattern emerged among full-time African American community college students. This decline resulted from a sharp drop in the number of African Americans who transferred to a public four-year campus. The four-year success rates of full-time African American community college students have consistently and substantially lagged behind that of all students, although the gap has slightly narrowed since 1985. The community colleges with the highest four-year success rates for the entering class of 1992 were Howard, Charles, and Frederick (40% or higher). Those with the lowest were Prince George's, Cecil, and Baltimore City (26% or lower). The community colleges which had the greatest four-year success rates among African Americans in the 1992 cohort were Chesapeake, Frederick, Essex, and Hagerstown (21% or above). Those at which African Americans were least successful were Prince George's, Montgomery, and Charles (17% or lower). (VWC) ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITY Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.

Transcript of ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of...

Page 1: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 436 223 JC 990 693

TITLE Retention, Graduation and Transfer Rates at MarylandCommunity Colleges.

INSTITUTION Maryland State Higher Education Commission, Annapolis.

PUB DATE 1997-06-00NOTE 88p.

PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) Reports - Research(143)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Academic Achievement; *Academic Persistence; Black Students;

College Freshmen; *Community Colleges; EducationalAttainment; *Full Time Students; *Graduation; *SchoolHolding Power; Student Educational Objectives; StudentPlacement; Tables (Data); *Transfer Students; Two YearColleges

IDENTIFIERS *Maryland

ABSTRACTThis report contains the second, third, and fourth year

retention, transfer, and graduation patterns at each Maryland publiccommunity college for all first-time, full-time students and African-Americanfirst-time, full-time students for the entering classes from 1985 to 1994.The following highlights are presented: the four-year success rates of newfull-time freshmen, measured by the percentage of those earning a degree orcertificate or transferring to a public four-year campus, has steadilydeclined since 1989. The same pattern emerged among full-time AfricanAmerican community college students. This decline resulted from a sharp dropin the number of African Americans who transferred to a public four-yearcampus. The four-year success rates of full-time African American communitycollege students have consistently and substantially lagged behind that ofall students, although the gap has slightly narrowed since 1985. Thecommunity colleges with the highest four-year success rates for the enteringclass of 1992 were Howard, Charles, and Frederick (40% or higher). Those withthe lowest were Prince George's, Cecil, and Baltimore City (26% or lower).The community colleges which had the greatest four-year success rates amongAfrican Americans in the 1992 cohort were Chesapeake, Frederick, Essex, andHagerstown (21% or above). Those at which African Americans were leastsuccessful were Prince George's, Montgomery, and Charles (17% or lower).(VWC)

ENTIRE DOCU ENT:

POOR PRINT QUALITY

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.

Page 2: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

16.1

1111

.11

1&11

11M

AR

YL

AN

D H

IGH

ER

ED

UC

AT

ION

CO

MM

ISSI

ON

RE

TE

NT

ION

, GR

AD

UA

TIO

N A

ND

TR

AN

SF

ER

RA

TE

S

AT

MA

RY

LAN

D C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

OLL

EG

ES

U.S

. DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

OF

ED

UC

AT

ION

Offi

ce o

f Edu

catio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Impr

ovem

ent

ED

UC

AT

ION

AL

RE

SO

UR

CE

S IN

FO

RM

AT

ION

CE

NT

ER

(E

RIC

),J

4Thi

s do

cum

ent h

as b

een

repr

oduc

ed a

sec

eive

d fr

om th

e pe

rson

or

orga

niza

tion

orig

inat

ing

it.

0 M

inor

cha

nges

hav

e be

en m

ade

toim

prov

e re

prod

uctio

n qu

ality

.

Poi

nts

of v

iew

or

opin

ions

sta

ted

in th

isdo

cum

ent d

o no

t nec

essa

rily

repr

esen

tof

ficia

l OE

RI p

ositi

on o

r po

licy.

JUN

5 vr

o19

97

JUN

E 1

997

1

1.-

f,.)

to)

tri

\I\I

00

PE

RM

ISS

ION

TO

RE

PR

OD

UC

E A

ND

DIS

SE

MIN

AT

E T

HIS

MA

TE

RIA

L H

AS

BE

EN

GR

AN

TE

D B

Y

H.

goxA

mg_

t-e

TO

TH

E E

DU

CA

TIO

NA

L R

ES

OU

RC

ES

INF

OR

MA

TIO

N C

EN

TE

R (

ER

IC)

MA

RY

LA

ND

HIG

HE

R E

DU

CA

TIO

N C

OM

MIS

SIO

NB

EST

CO

PYA

VA

ILA

BL

E16

Fra

ncis

Str

eet,A

nnap

olis

, Mar

ylan

d 21

401

Page 3: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

JC990693

Retention, Graduation and Transfer Rates at Maryland Community Colleges1997-06-00

Contributed by:M. R. RosenthalMaryland Higher Education Commission16 Francis StreetAnnapolis, MD 21401Phone:Fax:

Reviewer's Comments:Process

Transfer to

Reject

Release Level:1

Log date: 1999-12-17

blanket, M.R. Rosenthal

<CHNO>JC990693<PDATE>1997-06-00<LEVEL>1<TITLE>Retention, Graduation and Transfer Rates at Maryland Community Colleges.<INST>BBB28630=Maryland State Higher Education Commission, Annapolis.<PTYPE>143<GEO>U.S.; Maryland<GOV>State

Page 4: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

5

MA

RY

LA

ND

HIG

HE

R E

DU

CA

TIO

NC

OM

MIS

SIO

N

Edw

ard

0. C

lark

e, J

r., C

hair

man

The

Hon

orab

le J

. Gle

nn B

eall,

Jr.

boro

thy

Dix

on C

hane

y

Don

na H

. Cun

ning

ham

e

John

L. G

reen

Jam

ie K

endr

ick

Ter

ry L

. Lie

rman

Osb

orne

A. P

ayne

R. K

athl

een

Peri

ni

Cha

rles

B. S

aund

ers,

Jr.

Ric

hard

P. S

tree

tt, J

r.

Alb

ert N

atha

niel

Whi

ting

Patr

icia

S. F

lore

stan

o, P

h.D

.Se

cret

ary

of H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Thi

s pu

blic

atio

n is

ava

ilabl

e in

alte

rnat

e fo

rmat

s.Pl

ease

cal

l (41

0) 9

74-2

971

or (

800)

735

0-22

58 (

ITY

/Voi

ce).

Page 5: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

W-9

7/6

7/

Hig

hlig

hts

of R

eten

tion,

Tra

nsfe

r an

d G

radu

atio

n R

ates

at

Mar

ylan

d C

omm

unity

Col

lege

s

Thi

s re

port

con

tain

s th

e se

cond

, thi

rd a

nd f

ourt

h ye

ar r

eten

tion,

tran

sfer

and

gra

duat

ion

patte

rns

atea

chM

aryl

and

publ

icco

mm

unity

col

lege

for

all

firs

t-tim

e, f

ull-

time

stud

ents

and

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an f

irst

-tim

e, f

ull-

time

stud

ents

for

the

ente

ring

cla

sses

fro

m19

85 to

199

4. T

his

repo

rt u

ses

the

follo

win

g de

fini

tions

:

Stil

l Enr

olle

d -

The

stu

dent

was

ret

aine

d at

thei

r or

igin

alco

mm

unity

col

lege

or

has

tran

sfer

red

to a

noth

er M

aryl

and

com

mun

ity c

olle

ge.

Gra

duat

ed/D

id N

ot T

rans

fer

-T

he s

tude

nt g

radu

ated

fro

m a

Mar

ylan

d co

mm

unity

col

lege

with

eith

er a

n as

soci

ate

degr

ee o

ra

low

er d

ivis

ion

cert

ific

ate

and

did

not t

rans

fer

to a

Mar

ylan

dpu

blic

fou

r-ye

ar in

stitu

tion.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to a

4 Y

ear

-T

he s

tude

nt tr

ansf

erre

d to

a M

aryl

and

publ

ic f

our-

year

cam

pus.

The

siu

dent

may

or

may

not

hav

eea

rned

an

asso

ciat

e de

gree

or

a lo

wer

div

isio

n ce

rtif

icat

e pr

ior

to tr

ansf

erri

ng.

Som

e hi

ghlig

hts:

The

fou

r-ye

ar s

ucce

ss r

ates

of

new

ful

l-tim

e fr

eshm

en,

mea

sure

d by

the

perc

enta

ge o

f th

ose

earn

ing

a de

gree

or

cert

ific

ate

or tr

ansf

erri

ng to

a p

ublic

fou

r-ye

arca

mpu

s, h

asst

eadi

ly d

eclin

ed s

ince

198

9 fr

om 3

9 pe

rcen

t to

34 p

erce

nt.

Few

er s

tude

nts

in th

e cl

ass

of 1

992

eith

er g

radu

ated

or

tran

sfer

red

than

did

thei

r co

unte

rpar

ts w

ho m

atri

cula

ted

in 1

985

(37

perc

ent)

. 7

39 38 37 36 35 34 33

Fou

r-Y

ear

Suc

cess

Rat

esA

ll S

tude

nts

1989

1990

1991

1992

The

sam

e pa

ttern

em

erge

dam

ong

full-

time

Afr

ican

Am

eric

anco

mm

unity

col

lege

stu

dent

s. T

he f

our-

year

suc

cess

rat

e fo

rA

fric

an A

mer

ican

s dr

oppe

d co

ntin

ually

fro

m 2

2 pe

rcen

t in

1989

to 1

9 pe

rcen

t in

1992

. All

of th

is d

eclin

e re

sulte

d fr

om a

sha

rpdr

op (

from

18

perc

ent t

o 14

per

cent

) in

the

num

ber

of A

fric

anA

mer

ican

s w

ho tr

ansf

erre

d to

a p

ublic

fou

r-ye

arca

mpu

s.

23 22 21 20 19 18

Fou

r-Y

ear

Suc

cess

Rat

esA

fric

an A

mer

ican

Stu

dent

s

1989

1990

1991

1992

ST C

OPY

AM

1

8

Page 6: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

The

fou

r-ye

ar s

ucce

ss r

ates

of

full-

time

Afr

ican

Am

eric

anco

mm

unity

col

lege

stu

dent

s ha

ve c

onsi

sten

tly a

nd s

ubst

antia

llyla

gged

beh

ind

that

of

all s

tude

nts,

alth

ough

the

gap

has

slig

htly

narr

owed

sin

ce 1

985

whe

n 17

per

cent

of

thes

e st

uden

tsgr

adua

ted

or tr

ansf

erre

d.

Suc

cess

Rat

es o

f Afr

ican

-Am

eric

ans

and

All

Stu

dent

s

1989

1990

1991

0 A

fric

an-A

mer

ican

s II

All

Stu

dent

s

1992

The

com

mun

ity c

olle

ges

with

the

high

est f

our-

year

suc

cess

rat

esfo

r th

e en

teri

ng c

lass

of

1992

wer

e H

owar

d (4

3 pe

rcen

t),

Cha

rles

(42

per

cent

) an

d Fr

eder

ick

(40

perc

ent)

. Tho

se w

ithth

e lo

wes

t wer

e Pr

ince

Geo

rge'

s (2

6 pe

rcen

t), C

ecil

(25

perc

ent)

and

Bal

timor

e C

ity (

21 p

erce

nt).

The

com

mun

ity c

olle

ges

whi

ch h

ad th

e gr

eate

st f

our-

year

succ

ess

rate

s am

ong

Afr

ican

Am

eric

ans

in th

e 19

92 c

ohor

t wer

eC

hesa

peak

e (6

0 pe

rcen

t), F

rede

rick

(24

per

cent

), E

ssex

(23

perc

ent)

and

Hag

erst

own

(21

perc

ent)

. Tho

se a

t whi

ch A

fric

anA

mer

ican

s w

ere

leas

t suc

cess

ful w

ere

Prin

ce G

eorg

e's

(17

perc

ent)

, Mon

tgom

ery

(17

perc

ent)

and

Cha

rles

(11

per

cent

).10

9

Page 7: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

11

Ret

entio

n, G

radu

atio

n an

d T

rans

fer

Rat

es

Mar

ylan

d C

omm

unity

Col

lege

s(B

y C

ampu

s)

3

RE

FER

EN

CE

ES

SE

XC

OM

MU

NIT

YC

OLL

EG

E

TH

E J

AM

E.

NE

WP

HE

RLI

BIz

AR

Y

NO

T T

O B

EST

AA

ICE

AF

RD

.A T

i-113

RO

D A

2

Page 8: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

,M

AR

YLA

ND

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

SA

ll S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

oed

, tra

nsfe

rred

, gra

duat

ed:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r

1985

8,94

230

.6%

4.4%

14.9

%

1986

8,98

833

.4%

3.5%

15.1

%

1987

9,44

834

.2%

4.3%

14.1

%

1988

10,7

2735

.1%

3.4%

15.2

%

1989

11,0

1936

.2%

2.7%

16.3

%

1990

10,3

0336

.2%

3.2%

14.8

%

1991

11,0

0336

.6%

3.1%

13.4

%

1992

11,0

0835

.6%

2.7%

12.9

%

1993

10,6

9236

.2%

2.2%

12.9

%

1994

10,4

3635

.5%

2.1%

12.6

%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

14.7

%9.

3%22

.2%

16.1

%8.

4%22

.7%

16.7

%9.

1%22

.8%

17.4

%8.

0%24

.6%

17.7

%7.

6%25

.5%

17.7

%8.

2%23

.1%

18.4

%7.

9%21

.5%

17.7

%6.

9%20

.8%

18.0

%6.

9%20

.7%

8.9%

9.7%

10.3

%

10.0

%

10.4

%

10.6

%

10.7

%

10.0

%

11.0

%

10.3

%

10.8

%

10.3

%

9.6%

10.0

%

9.9%

9.1%

25.7

%

26.3

%

26.6

%

28.6

%

29.3

%

27.1

%

25.3

%

24.5

%z.

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

135

14

Page 9: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

MA

RY

LAN

D C

OM

MU

NIT

YC

OLL

EG

ES

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d,gr

adua

ted:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot19

851,

755

25.4

%1.

8%

1986

1,67

327

.9%

1.0%

1987

1,77

529

.3%

1.6%

1988

1,82

630

.0%

1.4%

1989

1,96

630

.1%

1.0%

1990

1,82

232

.5%

1.0%

1991

2,19

532

.3%

1.7%

1992

2,48

632

.5%

1.7%

1993

2,35

234

.2%

-0.

7%

1994

2,46

232

.0%

0.8%

Tra

ns.

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Tra

nsfe

rred

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

r6.

8%

6.8%

6.7%

6.6%

8.7%

9.1%

6.8%

6.6%

7.1%

7.5%

13.7

%4.

0%10

.0%

15.0

%3.

6%10

.5%

17.2

%4.

2%10

.8%

18.5

%3.

5%11

.1%

19.9

%3.

2%14

.3%

18.5

%2.

9%14

.3%

19.4

%3.

4%11

.9%

18.8

%3.

4%11

.0%

19.3

%2.

6%11

.7%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

ndD

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

...

.

8.3%

9.1%

12.0

%

12.4

%

11.4

%

13.2

%

12.4

%

11.9

%

5.2%

12.0

%

5.1%

13.4

%

13.3

%

14.5

%

17.8

%

16:7

%

15.4

%

13.8

%

6.3%

5.1%

4.4%

3.7%

4.4%

4.8%

1516

Page 10: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

ALL

EG

AN

Y C

OLL

EG

EA

ll S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o' Y

ears

N

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r19

8540

726

.1%

21.6

%11

.5%

1986

424

26.2

%17

.7%

9.2°

A

1987

439

28.7

%21

,2%

9.3%

1988

479

30.5

%18

.6%

9.6%

1989

503

34.6

%11

.5%

9.8%

1990

459

34.7

%12

.9%

7.0%

1991

499

35.7

%10

.6%

8.0%

1992

436

32.6

%10

.4%

5.2%

1993

477

36.7

%10

.5%

5.7%

1994

458

33.4

%8.

3%6.

6%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r9.

1%34

.6%

14.7

%

7.5%

30.7

%12

.8%

10.2

%32

.4%

13.9

%

12.1

%27

.1%

16.9

%

13.1

%24

.7%

15.3

%

11.7

%26

.3%

14.8

%

13.0

%25

.6%

12.4

%

15.8

%21

.7%

8.7%

16.7

%26

.0%

10.1

%

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/E

nrol

led

ID

id N

ot T

rans

.4.

1%37

.1%

6.2%

31.4

%

5.0%

34.4

%

5.8%

28.8

%

7.4%

29.0

%

5.2%

29.4

%

4.8%

31.7

%

8.0%

26.8

%

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r17

.2%

15.3

%

16.1

%

20.1

%

16.7

%

17.0

%

14.4

%

10.5

%W

iPi''

:".::

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

187

Page 11: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

inR

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

ALL

EG

AN

Y C

OLL

EG

EA

fric

an A

mer

ican

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d,tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.19

8514

1986

16

12.5%

0.0%

1987

1526.7%

33.3%

1988

1910.6%

10.5%

1989

21

23.8%

0.0%

1990

9

1991

1921

.1%

10.5%

1992

12

1993

8

1994

1811

.2%

11.1

%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Trim

sfer

red

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

r

6.3%

0.0%

5.3%

4.8%

5.3%

5.6%

..

12.5%

0.0%

12.6%

6.3%

0.0%

12.6%

6.7%

46.7%

0.0%

0.0%

40.0%

13.4%

5.3%

15.8%

10.5%

0.0%

10.5%

15.8%

0.0%

9.5%

4.8%

0.0%

9.5%

4.8%

5.3%

15.8%

5.3%

N le

ss th

an 1

5

Source: MHEC

Enr

ollm

ent a

ndD

egre

e In

form

atio

nS

yste

ms

BE

ST

CO

PY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

Page 12: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

AN

NE

AR

UN

DE

L C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

OLL

EG

EA

ll S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

ed'

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edE

nrol

led

_Did

Not

Tra

ns._

to 4

Yea

r19

8586

935

.2%

2.2%

18.8

%15

.7%

6.2%

28.9

%8.

1%8.

6%32

.9%

t19

8694

933

.5%

2.3%

17.9

%16

.7%

6.6%

26.6

%9.

3%8.

7%30

.7%

1987

1,03

632

.5%

3.5%

18.8

%16

.7%

8.3%

28.7

%10

.4%

9.6%

33.3

%

1988

1,25

137

.7%

2.0%

17.7

%16

.6%

5.8%

30.2

%10

.8%

8.2%

33.8

%

1989

1,30

838

.6%

2.4%

18.7

%17

.5%

5.5%

32.1

%9.

6%7.

2%36

.0%

1990

1,24

436

.4%

2.1%

19.3

%16

.8%

6.1%

30.2

%9.

1%7.

7%35

.6%

1991

1,18

837

.6%

2.6%

18.8

%16

.7%

6.6%

29.7

%9.

5%8.

1%34

.4%

1992

1,19

233

.4%

2.1%

17.4

%17

.0%

6.3%

27.1

%8.

7%7.

7%'

A31

.4% '':

'19

931,

202

35.7

%1.

6%15

.8%

18.2

%,.

5.0%

25.5

%

1994

1,02

4

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e in

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

21ST

CO

PY A

VA

ILA

BL

E

9

22

Page 13: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

AN

NE

AR

UN

DE

L C

OM

MU

NIT

YC

OLL

EG

EA

fric

an A

mer

ican

Stu

dent

s

Per

cer9

enro

lled,

tran

sfer

red,

gra

duat

ed:

Coh

ort

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

Tw

o Y

ears

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

7227

.8%

1.4%

12.5

%9.

7%2.

8%15

.3%

9.7%

1.4%

18.0

%71

28.2

%0.

0%11

.3%

12.7

%2.

8%11

.3%

8.4%

5.6%

14.1

%64

32.9

%1.

6%10

.9%

17.2

%4.

7%17

.2%

12.5

%6.

2%17

.2%

8328

.9%

0.0%

10.8

%15

.6%

3.6%

16.9

%12

.0%

4.8%

19.3

%91

33.0

%3.

3%3.

3%20

.9%

3.3%

11.0

%13

.2%

4.4%

12.1

%89

37.1

%1.

1%10

.1%

22.4

%2.

2%11

.2%

11.2

%3.

3%13

.5%

7229

.2%

0.0%

2.8%

12.5

%1.

4%11

.2%

9.7%

2.8%

11.1

%85

25.9

%1.

2%7.

1%21

.2%

2.4%

8.3%

11.7

%4.

7%13

.0%

8229

.2%

1.2%

6.1%

15.9

%2.

4%9.

7%

8028

.8%

0.0%

12.6

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

eIn

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

2324

Page 14: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

BA

LTIM

OR

E C

ITY

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

1985

614

19.9

%2.

4%7.

5%

1986

404

19.8

%3.

2%7.

6%v

1987

466

23.2

%4.

3%5.

5%

1988

427

23.9

%3.

0%3.

9%

1989

605

24.6

%2.

0%14

.3%

1990

532

28.0

%3.

0%14

.1%

1991

752

31.0

%3.

8%7.

4%

1992

1,02

433

.5%

3.2%

7.7%

1993

624

37.3

%1.

2%7.

2%

1994

686

32.1

%1.

5%6.

7%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dI

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

r9.

4%4.

7%10

.6%

10.4

%5.

6%10

.6%

13.8

%6.

9%10

.1%

15.4

%7.

7%8.

2%

18.7

%6.

0%18

.5%

16.7

%5.

7%17

.1%

21.2

%5.

7%12

.2%

19.2

%4.

9%11

.7%

21.3

%2.

5%11

.7%

7.2%

5.8%

11.9

%

5.5%

6.4%

13.9

%

7.7%

9.0%

13.0

%

13.1

%10

.0%

11.2

%

8.9%

8.3%

20.0

%

12.6

%7.

0%19

.9%

11.1

%7.

9%15

.8%

11.8

%6.

8%14

.5%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

2511

26

Page 15: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

BA

LTIM

OR

E C

ITY

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coi

rout

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1S

till

NE

nrol

led

19.8

%

Tw

o Y

ears

Stil

lE

rrof

fed

7.7%

20.0

%

24.5

%

25.0

%

23.3

%

31.0

%

32.2

%

.34.

4%

38.1

%

32.2

%

0.8%

4.6%

1.2%

3.4%

0.7%

14.2

%

1.4%

13.3

%

3.3%

6.8%

2.2%

6.8%

11.5

%

14.5

%

17.9

%

20.7

%

17.9

%

22.9

%

19.7

%

1.2%

6.9%

22.2

%

1.2%

5.4%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

4.3%

7.9%

6.4%

5.2%

3.3%

9.8%

9.3%

5.7%

3.7%

8.4%

15.5

%6.

2%

3.3%

18.1

%10

.4%

5.4%

3.6%

16.9

%14

.2%

4.8%

5.0%

11.5

%12

.7%

6.7%

3.9%

10.1

%12

.1%

5.5%

2.5%

10.9

%

11.6

%

12.5

%

11.4

%

19.8

%

19.3

%

15.7

%

13.1

%

BE

ST

CO

PY

AV

AIL

AB

LE28

Page 16: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

CA

RR

OLL

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d,gr

adua

ted:

Coh

ort

1985

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Tw

o Y

ears

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rS

till

Enr

olle

d

Thr

ee Y

ears

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

nsT

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Fou

r Y

ears

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

42.9

%1.

7%15

.2%

14.9

%12

.2%

22.8

%,

...

38.9

%2.

6%14

.8%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

ndD

egre

e In

form

atio

nS

yste

ms

29B

ES

T C

OP

Y A

VA

ILA

BLE

13

30

Page 17: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

CA

RR

OLL

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

2 5

Tw

o Y

ears

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferf

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

r

N le

ss th

an 1

5

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

fotm

atio

n S

yste

ms

312

Page 18: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

CA

TO

NS

VIL

LE C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

OLL

EG

EA

ll S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

o ed

, tra

nsfe

rred

, gra

duat

ed:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

Thr

ee Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r19

85

1986

1987

1988

768

791

836

972

1989

1,10

7

1990

1,14

7

1991

1,22

0

1992

1,16

6

1993

1994

938

916

29.5

%1.

0%16

.8%

38.0

%1.

1%14

.8%

38.9

%0.

9%11

.5%

38.0

%0.

6%17

.7%

39.9

%0.

9%17

.6%

37.2

%1.

3%16

.6%

37.7

%0.

5%15

.5%

38.4

%1.

4%14

.4%

38.4

%0.

2%11

.4%

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Did

Not

Tra

ns._

to 4

Yea

r16

.8%

3.6%

25.3

%

18.2

%5.

7%24

.3%

17.8

%5.

7%22

.8%

20.5

%4.

1%29

.8%

16.8

%6.

1%30

.8%

.

19.2

%5.

2%26

.3%

20.3

%5.

0%24

.7%

18.9

%3.

1%24

.4%

18.8

%3.

8%20

.7%

.;:t,,

:.*...

:::/-

---

':-..:

.'*:.x

:;%:x

:.;:.

..,0:

::::::

::::::

:v.::

::::::

:ipi:,

.;.:V

i

.;:

:)5

?4:2

::::::

::::::

::::::

::',

:'''':

A:x

5S,

`'.:X

4:"I

i4.;S

:'].:;

t:'37

.3%

0.2%

13.4

%l'4

,:',::

;:.:5

.:0K

4P..:

::

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/E

nrol

led

kid

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r9.

5%5.

1%29

.4%

10.6

%7.

8%-

28.3

%

11.4

%7.

3%26

.9%

10.9

%7.

4%34

.2%

9.0%

7.6%

35.7

%

10.7

%8.

0%30

.8%

13.7

%5.

6%27

.8%

11.2

%7.

2%28

.1%

3315

BE

ST C

OPY

AV

ME

LE

34

Page 19: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

CA

TO

NS

VIL

LEC

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

OLL

EG

EA

fric

an A

mer

ican

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d,gr

adua

ted:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

1985

166

21.7

%0.

6%8.

4%

1986

158

31.6

%0:

6%11

.4%

1987

173

28.9

%0.

6%9.

2%

1986

153

33.3

%0.

0%9.

1%

1989

176

27.8

%0.

0%5.

7%

1990

197

34.0

%0.

5%10

.1%

1991

241

35.7

%0.

0%9.

5%

1992

235

34.5

%0.

0%6.

4%

1993

269

33.1

%0.

0%6.

7%

1994

296

33.4

%0.

0%7.

8%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r15

.0%

2.4%

12.6

%

16.5

%1.

9%17

.1 %

17.4

%2.

9%12

.1%

23.5

%1.

3%12

.5%

21.0

%1.

1%13

.1%

16.7

%2.

0%20

.3%

24.9

%0.

4%16

.6%

21.3

%0.

4%12

.7%

17.1

%0.

4%11

.9%

gor

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lI

Gra

duat

ed/

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

4.8%

4.8%

14.5

%

12.7

%1.

9%19

.0%

15.6

%4.

6%13

.9%

15.0

%4.

0%14

.4%

10.2

%2.

3%19

.4%

13.7

%2.

0%22

.8%

18.3

%0.

0%19

.5%

13.6

%1.

7%16

.2%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

nS

yste

ms

3G35

Page 20: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

CE

CIL

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N'

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r19

8588

22.7

%6.

8%9.

0%

1986

8026

.3%

5.0%

11.3

%r

1967

115

30.4

%3.

5%6.

1%

1988

9433

.0%

5.3%

7.5%

1989

9936

.3%

5.0%

16.1

%

1990

121

19.9

%4.

2%9.

1%

1991

141

29.1

%2.

8%11

.3%

1992

191

27.7

%2.

6%11

.0%

1993

138

26.1

%3.

6%8.

0%

1994

120

25.8

%2.

5%10

.0%

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Thr

ee Y

ears

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rS

till

Enr

olle

d5.

7%13

.6%

10.2

%

15.0

%12

.5%

12.5

%

17.4

%8.

7%12

.1%

20.2

%13

.8%

10.6

%

21.2

%9.

1%22

.3%

4.1%

7.5%

14.1

%

8.5%

12.8

%14

.1%

13.6

%8.

9%12

.6%

13.7

%7.

9%12

.3%

5.7%

6.3%

12.1

%

6.4%

11.1

%

5.8%

7.1%

8.9%

.::

Fou

r Y

ears

Gra

duat

ed/ '

Tra

nsfe

rred

Did

Not

Tra

ns. I

to 4

Yea

r15

.9%

15.1

%

10.5

%

17.1

%

14.1

%

7.5%

14.9

%

11.5

%

11.3

%

12.5

%

13.9

%

12.8

%

25.2

%

14.0

%

15.6

%

13.1

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

3717

Page 21: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

CE

CIL

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

o le

d,tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r19

85

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

3 6 10 6 3 3 3 3 2 4

N le

ss th

an 1

5

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

'9'1

"*'''"

"

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent

and

Deg

ree

Info

rmat

ion

Sys

tem

s

40

Page 22: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

CH

AR

LES

CO

UN

TY

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.19

8521

130

.4%

9.9%

1986

228

25.4

%4.

4%

1987

233

31.3

%5.

2%

1988

291

30.2

%5.

1%

1989

415

37.1

%2.

6%

1990

426

35.0

%2.

1%

1991

460

40.0

%2.

7%

1992

479

38.8

%1.

4%

1993

470

34.1

%0.

6%

1994

534

35.4

%0.

9%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

22.7

%12

.8%

19.4

%28

.9%

24.6

112

.8%

11.0

%30

.2%

23.6

%15

.0%

9.5%

32.1

%

28.5

%13

.4%

12.1

%38

.2%

18.8

%16

.8%

9.9%

28.3

%

18.6

%15

.2%

8.9%

29.8

%

20.0

%16

.5%

5.9%

32.8

%

20.5

%15

.7%

6.6%

30.2

%

24.0

%15

.3%

6.8%

33.6

%

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r6.

2%18

.5%

32.7

%

5.2%

13.6

%33

.8%

12.0

%11

.6%

35.1

%

6.9%

14.1

%41

.6%

10.2

%12

.0%

31.3

%

9.6%

10.1

%34

.3%

8.5%

10.2

%37

.0%

7.5%

8.2%

34.0

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

41B

EST

CO

PY A

VA

ILA

BL

E

42

Page 23: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

CH

AR

LES

CO

UN

TY

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

Afr

ican

Am

eric

anS

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d,tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

To

Yea

rs

N'

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r19

85

1986

11 14

-

1987

12

1988

2128

.6%

14.3

%9.

5%

1989

3240

.7%

0.0%

6.2%

1990

2853

.8%

3.6%

3.6%

1991

3234

.4%

3.1%

6.3%

1992

2733

.3%

0.0%

3.7%

1993

2924

.1%

0.0%

20.7

%

1994

4623

.9%

0.0%

15.2

%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns._

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

-

23.8

%19

.1%

19.1

%9.

5%19

.1%

28.5

%9.

4%9.

4%12

.5%

9.4%

12.5

%15

.6%

10.7

%7.

2%25

.1%

17.8

%7.

2%28

.6%

15.6

%3.

1%15

.7%

18.7

%6.

3%21

.9%

18.5

%0.

0%11

.1%

7.4%

0.0%

11.1

%6.

9%3.

4%27

.5%

N le

ss th

an 1

5

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

nS

yste

ms

43

Page 24: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

CH

ES

AP

EA

KE

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

1985

184

19.5

%10

.8%

12.0

%

1986

167

18.0

%13

.8%

9.6%

1987

152

22.4

%21

.7%

9.9%

1988

227

19.4

%12

.4%

15.4

%

1989

182

27.5

%4.

9%14

.2%

1990

192

20.8

%7.

9%14

.1%

1991

187

31.0

%12

.3%

13.9

%

1992

205

22.0

%12

.6%

13.6

%

1993

209

30.1

%2.

9%19

.6%

1994

196

26.1

%10

.7%

14.3

%

Stil

lE

nrol

led

10.8

%

11.4

%

11.2

%

9.3%

9.3%

11.5

%

15.5

%

7.8%

12.0

%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Gra

duat

ed!

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

17.4

%

21.0

%

25.0

%

18.0

%

9.3%

13.1

%

18.7

%

17.5

%

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r14

.1%

12.6

%

12.6

%

20.7

%

21.4

%

19.3

%

18.7

%

17.6

%

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed!

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r4.

9%19

.0%

16.9

%

3.0%

21.0

%14

.4%

7.3%

27.0

%13

.8%

5.3%

17.6

%23

.3%

8.2%

11.5

%21

.9%

5.2%

16.2

%20

.9%

8.6%

21.4

%22

.5%

3.4%

17.0

%21

.9%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

4521

Page 25: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

CH

ES

AP

EA

KE

CO

LLE

GE

Afr

ican

Am

eric

anS

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d,gr

adua

ted:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N'

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed!

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

1985

4413

.6%

13.6

%

1986

238.

7%4.

3%

1987

1910

.5%

31.6

%

1988

362.

8%6.

6%

1989

1612

.5%

6.3%

1990

3122

.6%

3.2%

1991

2532

.0%

20.0

%

1992

3023

.3%

43.3

%

1993

1811

.1%

0.0%

1994

2313

.0%

4.3%

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

N4e

arS

till

Enr

olle

d6.

8%6.

8%

0.0%

13.0

%

0.0%

10.6

%

5.6%

0.0%

12.5

%6.

3%

6.5%

6.5%

0.0%

16.0

%

0.0%

6.7%

5.6%

22.2

%-*

,:---

8.7%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r15

.9%

9.1%

8.7%

0.0%

31.6

%0.

0%

13.9

%11

.2%

12.6

%12

.5%

6.5%

9.7%

20.0

%0.

0%

53.4

%6.

6%

0.0%

5.6%

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lI

Gra

duat

ed!

Enr

olle

d I D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

2.3%

18.2

%9.

1%

0.0%

8.7%

0.0%

15.8

%31

.6%

0.0%

2.8%

13.9

%11

.2%

0.0%

12.6

%12

.5%

3.2%

6.5%

9.7%

8.0%

20.0

%0.

0%

3.3%

46.6

%13

.3%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent an

d D

egre

e in

form

atio

nS

yste

ms

48

Page 26: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

DU

ND

ALK

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N'

Stil

lI

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.19

8515

325

.5%

5.3%

1986

176

30.1

%4.

5%

1987

195

35.9

%4.

7%

1988

160

43.8

%5.

7%

1989

173

34.7

%1.

2%

1990

201

43.8

%4.

0%

1991

196

40.8

%2.

5%

1992

207

43.5

%2.

9%

1993

195

35.3

%1.

5%

1994

215

35.8

%1.

0%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Tra

nsfe

rred

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

6.6%

8.0%

7.2%

5.6%

13.3

%

7.5%

7.2%

6.8%

7.7%

7.5%

13.1

%11

.8%

9.8%

10.2

%12

.5%

11.9

%

11.8

%11

.3%

15.9

%

23.8

%11

.2%

13.8

%

11.0

%8.

7%19

.1%

14.9

%11

.4%

19.4

%

16.3

%9.

7%14

.8%

17.4

%9.

7%15

.0%

14.9

%6.

7%12

.8%

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/ 'T

rans

ferr

edE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.'

to 4

Yea

r10

.4%

15.7

%13

.7%

8.0%

14.2

%13

.7%

7.2%

12.9

%19

.0%

16.3

%14

.4%

15.0

%

8.1%

9.8%

21.4

%

7.5%

12.4

%21

.9%

8.7%

12.2

%18

.4%

11.5

%13

.1%

16.9

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

nS

yste

ms

4923

50

Page 27: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

DU

ND

ALK

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N'

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r19

8524

25.0

%0.

0%12

.5%

1986

2512

.0%

0.0

%-

0.0%

1987

4221

.5%

0.0%

2.4%

1988

12

1989

3429

.4%

0.0%

14.7

%

1990

2737

.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1991

36.

38.9

%2.

8%5.

6%

1992

3036

.7%

0.0%

0.0%

1993

3033

.3%

0.0%

.

10.0

%

1994

3020

.0%

3.3%

3.3%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r8.

3%8.

3%12

.5%

8.0%

0.0%

0.0%

9.5%

2.4%

4.8%

11.7

%2.

9%14

.7%

14.8

%3.

7%3.

7%

25.0

%2.

8%5.

6%

10.0

%10

.0%

6.7%

10.0

%3.

3%16

.7%

Y.

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r8.

3%16

.7%

12.5

%

4.0%

0.0%

4.0%

4.8%

4.8%

7.2%

5.8%

.2.

9%20

.6%

14.8

%3.

7%3.

7%

8.4%

5.6%

13.9

%

13.3

%13

.3%

6.6%

N le

ss th

an 1

5

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

ndD

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

5152

Page 28: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

ES

SE

X C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

OLL

EG

EA

ll S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N'

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r19

8580

233

.4%

2.0%

10.5

%

1986

851

38.4

%1.

0%12

.0%

1987

857

41.4

%0.

9%13

.2%

1988

1,07

341

.1%

1.1%

13.5

%

1989

1,04

542

.6%

1.1%

14.0

%

1990

1,07

240

.9%

1.1%

12.2

%

1991

891

41.5

%1.

3%9.

2%

1992

909

40.4

%1.

1%11

.5%

1993

916

39.1

%0.

9%11

.3%

1994

813

40.9

%1.

1%10

.9%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r

Fou

r Y

ears

16.3

%8.

5%19

.4%

117.

0%5.

7%22

.1%

17.8

%6.

2%25

.4%

18.4

%6.

2%26

.8%

22.9

%6.

3%24

.1%

19.8

%5.

1%22

.4%

18.9

%5.

2%20

.2%

18.0

%5.

7%23

.9%

18.5

%4.

3%22

.2%

Stil

lI

Gra

duat

ed/ '

Tra

nsfe

rred

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

11.1

%

12.7

%

12.4

%

11.0

%

12.9

%

12.7

%

11.2

%

10.1

%

10.6

%

7.4%

8.3%

8.5%

8.0%

6.9%

6.5%

8.6%

22.6

%

26.0

%

29.3

%

31.2

%

29.9

%

26.6

%

24.8

%

27.2

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

5325

BE

ST

CO

PY

AV

AI

LE54

Page 29: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

ES

SE

X C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

OLL

EG

EA

fric

an A

mer

ican

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edD

id N

ot T

rans

.__

to 4

Yfa

r19

8591

20.9

%1.

1%2.

2%

1986

9722

.7%

0.0%

.3.

1%

1987

8828

.4%

2.3%

4.5%

1988

8625

.6%

0.0%

4.7%

1989

9939

.4%

0.0%

7.1%

1990

120

30.8

%0.

8%10

.0%

1991

107

31.8

%0.

9%3.

7%

1992

8731

.0%

1.1%

8.0%

1993

106

26.4

%0.

9%3.

8%

1994

9936

.3%

1.0%

7.1%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed!

Tra

nsfe

rred

Did

Not

Tra

ns._

to 4

Yea

r8.

8%3.

3%5.

5%

13.4

%6.

2%3.

1%

12.5

%4.

5%10

.2%

17.4

%2.

3%8.

2%

25.2

%5.

1%14

.2%

15.0

%4.

2%15

.0%

13.0

%6.

5%11

.2%

12.6

%3.

4%17

.2%

15.1

%2.

8%5.

6%

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/E

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r7.

7%3.

3%6.

6%

4.1%

7.2%

9.3%

12.5

%9.

1%12

.5%

10.4

%2.

3%11

.6%

12.1

%8.

1%19

.2%

16.7

%4.

2%17

.5%

7.4%

8.4%

11.2

%

9.1%

4.6%

18.3

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

eIn

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

55

56

Page 30: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

FR

ED

ER

ICK

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tv

o Y

ears

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

NS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

._ to

4 Y

ear

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

Stil

lto

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

!D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

1985

337

32.1

%8.

3%12

.4%

12.5

%16

.9%

19.0

%9.

8%17

.5%

24.3

%

1986

370

33.5

%8.

4%13

.8%

16.5

%16

.5%

18.9

%7.

8%21

.1.%

20.2

%

t987

394

33.3

%11

.9%

14.7

%13

.5%

22.8

%20

.9%

8.4%

26.1

%23

.1%

1988

441

38.8

%9.

9%12

.0%

16.5

%22

.2%

17.4

%9.

6%26

.5%

19.7

%

1989

463

35.9

%10

.2%

13.0

%12

.3%

21.1

%21

.6%

10.0

%23

.5%

24.3

%

1990

477

33.8

%10

.7%

13.8

%12

.7%

21.6

%19

.9%

7.1%

24.9

%22

.0%

1991

455

35.6

%9.

7%9.

4%14

.9%

21.5

%14

.5%

9.0%

25.5

%17

.1%

1992

502

37.3

%6.

0%8.

6%14

.0%

16.5

%16

.0%

6.6%

21.1

%19

.2%

1993

492

34.7

%6.

3%10

.7%

14.6

%13

.8%

18.5

%iY

1994

470

34.0

%5.

3%15

.1%

Vfi

4.i

A;

/',,,,

.''

Wz'

///4

,/, c

%%

i'ng

4 ,.,4

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

5727

Page 31: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

FR

ED

ER

ICK

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

oed

, tra

nsfe

rred

, gra

duat

ed:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

h19

8510

''

1986

12

1987

1735

.3%

0.0%

5.9%

1988

1741

.2%

11.8

%11

.8%

1989

2330

.4%

4.3%

0.0%

1990

2828

.6%

7.2%

10.7

%

1991

2740

.7%

3.7%

3.7%

1992

3420

.5%

2.9%

8.8%

1993

2142

.9%

0.0%

0.0%

1994

2138

.1%

0.0%

4.8%

N le

ss th

an 1

5

Thr

ee Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r.

a.

11.8

%11

.8%

11.8

%

11.8

%23

.5%

11.8

%

13.0

%8.

7%13

.0%

10.7

%10

.7%

21.4

%

11.1

%7.

4%7.

4%

8.8%

5.9%

11.8

%

19.1

%4.

8%4.

8%

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r

17.7

%11

.B%

11.8

%

11.8

%23

.5%

11.8

%

8.7%

8.7%

13.0

%

3.6%

10.7

%25

.0%

14.8

%7.

4%7.

4%

0.0%

11.8

%11

.8%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

eIn

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

5960

Page 32: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

GA

RR

ET

T C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

OLL

EG

EA

ll S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

oed

, tra

nsfe

rred

, gra

duat

ed:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.19

8570

11.4

%15

.7%

1986

9114

.3%

8.8%

1987

9225

.0%

9.8%

1988

116

19.8

%6.

9%

1989

123

28.5

%6.

5%

1990

127

29.1

%8.

7%

1991

141

21.9

%7.

8%

1992

155

21.9

%10

.3%

1993

133

21.8

%6.

1%

1994

222

24.3

%5.

0%

Tra

nsfe

rred

'to

4 Y

ear

14.3

%

16.5

%

13.0

%

12.9

%

11.4

%

8.6%

13.5

%

6.4%

9.8%

8.1%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.,T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

5.7%

18.6

%18

.5%

i8.

8%16

.5%

19.8

%

6.5%

16.3

%18

.5%

2.6%

17.3

%19

.0%

6.5%

15.4

%18

.7%

12.6

%14

.2%

14.9

%

5.7%

17.7

%17

.7%

9.7%

16.7

%10

.3%

6.8%

15.8

%13

.6%

Stil

lI

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Enr

olle

d I D

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

4.3%

18.6

%21

.4%

6.6%

15.4

%.

23.1

%

2.2%

18.5

%19

.6%

2.6%

18.1

%19

.0%

2.4%

16.3

%22

.0%

6.3%

17.3

%16

.5%

4.9%

17.7

%17

.7%

3.8%

19.4

%11

.0%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

6129

62

Page 33: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

GA

RR

ET

T C

OM

MU

NIT

YC

OLL

EG

EA

fric

an A

mer

ican

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d,tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N'

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/ '

Tra

nsfe

rred

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yqa

r19

85

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

4 2 3 4 9 11 7 8 5 11

.

* N

less

than

15

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns._

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rS

till

IG

radu

ated

/E

nrol

led

I Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent

and

Deg

ree

Info

rmat

ion

Sys

tem

s

6463

Page 34: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

HA

GE

RS

TO

WN

JU

NIO

R C

OLL

EG

EA

ll S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d,gr

adua

ted:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N'

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

1985

359

23.9

%17

.6%

1986

343

24.2

%11

.4%

1987

417

27.8

%12

.4%

1988

417

29.0

%10

.5%

1989

504

34.1

%9.

3%

1990

476

28.6

%11

.1%

1991

516

26.2

%10

.5%

1992

488

26.7

%7.

4%

1993

462

25.5

%9.

9%

1994

495

24.4

%9.

5%

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rS

till

Enr

olle

d11

.4%

6.1%

10.5

%1

8.2%

10.0

%7.

7%

8.2%

9.9%

8.2%

11.5

%

9.1%

10.3

%

10.1

%9.

1%

9.9%

9.0%

8.2%

6.7%

8.9%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Gra

duat

ed!

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r26

.5%

15.1

%

21.3

%13

.4%

26.6

%14

.9%

22.3

%11

.5%

22.6

%14

.4%

.

25.2

%13

.0%

18.6

%14

.7%

18.4

%12

.7%

22.1

%10

.6%

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/E

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r5.

3%

5.0%

5.8%

4.4%

6.0%

4.4%

4.5%

4.3%

30.7

%

23.9

%

27.8

%

25.9

%

27.6

%

26.3

%

23.1

%

21.3

%

16.8

%

14.6

%

16.3

%

13.0

%

16.2

%

15.5

%

15.9

%

14.4

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

eIn

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

6531

BE

ST C

OPY

AV

ML

E66

Page 35: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

HA

GE

RS

TO

WN

JU

NIO

R C

OLL

EG

EA

fric

an A

mer

ican

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N'

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Did

Not

Tra

ns._

to 4

Yet

,'19

8530

23.4

%16

.7%

3.3%

1986

3026

.7%

3.3%

0.0%

1987

5219

.2%

3.8%

1.9%

1988

3225

.0%

3.1%

0.0%

1989

4918

.3%

8.2%

8.2%

1990

5621

.5%

3.6%

5.4%

1991

5812

.1%

8.6%

10.3

%

1992

4812

.5%

4.2%

4.2%

1993

5010

.0%

6.0%

0.0%

1994

7315

.1%

2.7%

1.4%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

3.3%

30.0

%3.

3%

6.6%

30.0

%0.

0%

5.7%

19.2

%3.

8%

3.1%

18.8

%3.

1%

10.2

%16

.3%

12.3

%

12.5

%16

.1%

5.4%

6.9%

13.8

%10

.3%

4.2%

12.5

%8.

4%

0.0%

16.0

%2.

0%

0.0%

36.7

%3.

3%

6.7%

30.0

%0.

0%

5.7%

21.2

%3.

8%

3.1%

25.0

%3.

1%

6.1%

16.3

%18

.3%

3.6%

16.1

%7.

2%

1.7%

15.5

%10

.3%

4.2%

12.5

%8.

4%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

ndD

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

6768

Page 36: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

HA

RF

OR

D C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

OLL

EG

EA

ll S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

1985

402

30.1

%6.

4%17

.9%

1986

372

35.7

%5.

6%18

.0%

1

1987

361

36.1

%5.

3%16

.9%

1988

486

42.4

%3.

7%14

.6%

1989

494

39.8

%3.

4%14

.6%

1990

467

38.8

%4.

7%13

.8%

1991

531

36.1

%2.

8%13

.5%

1992

527

37.2

%0.

9%14

.4%

1993

480

38.3

%1.

4%14

.6%

1994

467

38.6

%1.

2%11

.6%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

r14

.7%

10.2

%28

.4%

18.3

%15

.0%

26.1

%

17.2

%10

.3%

28.5

%

20.4

%10

.3%

26.3

%

20.8

%8.

7%22

.9%

19.1

%12

.2%

22.7

%

20.3

%9.

8%22

.0%

16.1

%5.

9%23

.7%

16.6

%6.

2%24

1%

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r7.

2%13

.1%

30.6

%

9.7%

18.3

%29

.3%

9.7%

12.7

%33

.6%

12.8

%12

.0%

30.4

%

12.3

%11

.7%

25.7

%

10.9

%13

.3%

26.1

%

10.7

%11

.3%

26.9

%

10.2

%8.

9%26

.8%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

6933

70

Page 37: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

HA

RF

OR

D C

OM

MU

NIT

YC

OLL

EG

EA

fric

an A

mer

ican

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

oed

, tra

nsfe

rred

, gra

duat

ed:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edD

id N

ot T

rans

._ to

4 Y

epr

1985

5022

.0%

2.0%

12.0

%

1986

2326

.0%

8.6%

0.0%

1987

2420

.9%

4.2%

4.2%

1988

4327

.9%

9.3%

9.3%

1989

2944

.8%

3.4%

0.0%

1990

3619

.5%

2.8%

8.3%

1991

2941

.3%

0.0%

0.0%

1992

3732

.4%

0.0%

8.1%

1993

4131

.7%

2.4%

4.9%

1994

3016

.7%

3.3%

6.6%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

12.0

%4.0%

16.0

%

13.0

%13

.0%

4.3%

16.6

%12

.5%

8.3%

21.0

%11.6%

11.6%

20.6

%10

.3%

6.9%

11.1

%2.

8%11

.2%

31.0

%10

.3%

3.4%

18.9

%2.

7%10

.8%

14.6%

7.3%

7.3%

4.0%

6.0%

16.0%

4.3%

17.3

%8.

7%

12.5

%12

.5%

16.6%

14.0

%11.6%

13.9

%

13.7

%10

.3%

20.6

%

16.7

%2.

8%13

.9%

17.2

%10

.3%

6.9%

5.4%

5.4%

13.5

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent

and

Deg

ree

info

rmat

ion

Sys

tem

s

Page 38: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

HO

WA

RD

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d,gr

adua

ted:

Coh

ort

N19

8520

6

1986

212

1987

242

1988

282

1989

353

1990

187

1991

336

1992

241

1993

397

1994

392

Tw

o Y

ears

Thr

ee Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

32.5

%3.

0%18

.5%

16.0

%6.

4%25

.7%

33.9

%1.

4%21

.3%

1 14

.6%

3.8%

31.2

%

34.7

%2.

9%19

.8%

21.5

%6.

6%29

.0%

35.1

%2.

8%21

.3%

23.0

%6.

7%34

.0%

31.4

%1.

6%22

.9%

17.8

%3.

6%34

.8%

36.4

%1.

6%17

.7%

15.5

%4.

8%29

.4%

40.5

%2.

1%15

.2%

21.2

%4.

8%23

.6%

34.8

%0.

8%21

.1%

17.0

%4.

1%32

.4%

28.2

%2.

6%23

.2%

16.2

%3.

6%32

.5%

36.0

%0.

8%17

.1%

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r

.

12.6

%7.

3%29

.1%

8.5%

4.3%

34.4

%

13.2

%9.

1%33

.9%

11.7

%8.

5%41

.5%

11.0

%4.

8%38

.8%

9.1%

4.8%

34.3

%

13.4

%6.

6%28

.5%

9.5%

5.0%

37.8

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

ndD

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

73

35B

ES

T C

OP

Y A

VA

ILA

BLE

74

Page 39: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

HO

WA

RD

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d,tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N'

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

r19

8536

33.4

%2.

8%13

.9%

1986

3225

.0%

0.0%

9.4%

1987

3823

.7%

0.0%

18.4

%

1988

4032

.5%

2.5%

15.0

%

1989

5326

.4%

1.9%

22.7

%

1990

2133

.4%

0.0%

0.0%

1991

4129

.3%

0.0%

7.3%

1992

3129

.1%

0.0%

9.7%

1993

6533

.9%

0.0%

12.3

%

1994

8122

.2%

0.0%

8.6%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

19.5

%2.

8%19

.4%

15.6

%3.

1%12

.5%

21.0

%0.

0%21

.0%

25.0

%5.

0%22

.5%

18.9

%1.

9%34

.0%

14.3

%0.

0%19

.0%

12.2

%0.

0%12

.2%

19.4

%0.

0%16

.1%

18.5

%3.

1%20

.0%

11.1

%2.

8%27

.8%

15.7

%3.

1%15

.6%

15.8

%2.

6%26

.4%

12.5

%5.

0%35

.0%

9.5%

1.9%

35.9

%

9.6%

0.0%

19.0

%

9.8%

0.0%

12.2

%

9.7%

0.0%

19.4

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent

and

Deg

ree

Info

rmat

ion

Sys

tem

s

6'7

5

Page 40: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

o le

d,tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

N'

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

1985

2,11

034

.7%

1.3%

1986

2,13

136

.9%

1.2%

1987

2,15

935

.2%

1.1%

1988

2,49

034

.4%

1.0%

1989

2,35

435

.2%

0.7%

1990

1,87

440

.0%

0.7%

1991

2,25

839

.7%

1.1%

1992

2,08

538

.5%

0.7%

1993

2,07

238

.1%

1.1%

1994

2,06

38.5

%0.

7%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Tra

nsfe

rred

Stil

lG

radu

ated

!T

rans

ferr

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/ '

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.'

to 4

Yea

r17

.8%

18.1

%1

16.1

%

16.9

%

18.6

%

16.4

%

14.9

%

15.1

%

13.6

%

13.3

%

17.8

%4.

8%25

.8%

19.0

%4.

0%26

.4%

19.1

%2.

8%24

.9%

19.0

%2.

5%26

.1%

19.1

%2.

8%26

.9%

22.8

%2.

9%25

.1%

23.1

%3.

7%22

.9%

21.5

%3.

2%22

.8%

21.5

%3.

7%21

.2%

10.7

%6.

1%29

.4%

11.3

%5.

6%30

.8%

11.2

%4.

1%29

.6%

10.7

%4.

5%30

.7%

12.3

%4.

0%31

.0%

14.6

%4.

4%29

.8%

13.6

%5.

6%27

.2%

11.9

%4.

4%28

.2%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

nS

yste

ms

7 7

37

7 8

Page 41: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

LLE

GE

Afr

ican

Am

eric

anS

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

I

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4Y

ear

I1985

225

36.8%

0.9%

5.8%

1986

310

33.6%

0.7%

7.7%

1987

287

31.7%

0.4%

7.7%

1988

341

35.2%

0.0%

5.0%

1989

316

32.6%

1.3%

6.7%

1990

209

37.3%

0.5%

9.1%

1991

297

33.3%

0.7%

7.4%

1992

341

32.8%

0.0%

7.6%

1993

457

36.1%

0.2%,

9.0%

1994

445

35.5%

0.7%

8.3%

Three Years

Four Years

Stil

lG

radu

ated

!T

rans

ferr

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

Enr

olle

dD

id N

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dID

idN

ot T

rans

.to

4 Y

ear

20.0%

2.2%

10.7%

16.1%

2.6%

10.7%

21.6%

2.1%

10.5%

20.2%

1.8%

11.1%

21.5%

2.2%

12.0%

23.0%

1.9%

15.3%

19.5%

2.4%

13.5%

18.8%

1.2%

11.4%

19.5%

1.8%

14.2%

9.3%

3.1%

13.3%

9.0%

4.5%

14.5%

12.9%

2.4%

12.2%

15.5%

3.8%

15.3%

13.9%

2.2%

15.2%

15.6%

1.4%

18.7%

14.5%

2.7%

15.5%

10.9%

2.4%

14.1%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent

and

Deg

ree

Info

rmat

ion

Sys

tem

s

79ST

CO

PYM

AI

BL

E

80

Page 42: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

PR

INC

E G

EO

RG

E'S

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

ole

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

1985

1,28

132

.1%

2.0%

15.3

%

1986

1,30

036

.0%

0.6%

15.1

%

1987

.1,

372

36.5

%1.

4%14

.1%

1988

1,38

635

.8%

0.6%

15.4

%

1989

1,21

536

.7%

0.3%

16.4

%

1990

1,22

035

.7%

0.5%

14.7

%

1991

1,14

534

.5%

0.6%

12.9

%

1992

1,11

335

.8%

1.1%

11.1

%

1993

1,08

438

.5%

0.2%

10.1

%

1994

995

35.4

%0.

0%13

.8%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edS

till

IG

radu

ated

/'T

rans

ferr

edE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

I to

4 Y

ear

16.5

%4.

9%24

.0%

I 18.

7%3.

3%24

.7%

19.9

%4.

2%23

.0%

18.7

%3.

2%23

.6%

20.4

%2.

8%25

.3%

19.4

%2.

9%21

.6%

17.2

%2.

4%21

.3%

20.5

%2.

3%18

.8%

22.2

%2.

2%18

.5%

9.2%

6.4%

27.6

%

12.0

%5.

1%28

.2%

12.2

%5.

9%27

.0%

10.3

%5.

2%27

.9%

11.6

%4.

1%30

.3%

12.8

%4.

1%25

.5%

10.4

%3.

2%26

.3%

12.8

%3.

8%22

.0%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

nS

yste

ms

8139

82

Page 43: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

rR

ates

PR

INC

E G

EO

RG

E'S

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an S

tude

nts

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d,gr

adua

ted:

Coh

ort

N19

8544

9

1986

494

1987

550

1988

594

1989

546

1990

535

1991

601

1992

621

1993

1994

Tw

o Y

ears

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed!

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Tra

nsfe

rred

Stil

lto

4 Y

ear

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/D

id N

ot T

rans

.T

rans

ferr

edto

4 Y

ear

Stil

lI

Gra

duat

ed/ r

rans

ferr

e arE

nrol

led

I Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

r30

.3%

0.2%

6.7%

19.2

%1.

8%10

.5%

11.1

%3.

1%13

.3%

I32

.8%

0.0%

6.7%

18.6

%1.

6%13

.1%

11.3

%3.

4%15

.4%

34.2

%'0

.7%

6.7%

20.0

%2.

6%11

.8%

13.5

%4.

6%14

.6%

31.8

%0.

0%7.

9%18

.9%

0.8%

11.1

%10

.9%

2.2%

14.7

%33

.6%

0.0%

6.8%

20.5

%1.

3%12

.7%

12.8

%1.

9%16

.9%

32.9

%0.

2%6.

6%21

.5%

0.9%

11.0

%12

.9%

2.3%

13.7

%32

.3%

0.0%

6.9%

17.8

%0.

5%12

.0%

11.4

%1.

3%16

.8%

33.4

%0.

6%6.

0%20

.0%

1.4%

10.6

%14

.3%

3.2%

13.4

%34

.9%

0.2%

6.3%

21.5

%1.

9%11

.5%

35.1

%0.

0%8.

7%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

nS

yste

ms

8483

Page 44: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

,W

OR

-WIC

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

LLE

GE

All

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

oed

, tra

nsfe

rred

, gra

duat

ed:

Coh

ort

Tw

o Y

ears

NS

till

Enr

olle

dG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edD

id N

ot T

rans

., to

4 Y

ear

1985

8117

.3%

7.4%

7.4%

1986

9918

.2%

13.1

%10

.1%

1987

8232

.9%

12.2

%13

.4%

1988

135

25.9

%5.

1%23

.7%

1989

7626

.3%

0.0%

26.3

%

1990

8135

.8%

1.2%

19.8

%

1991

8732

.2%

1.1%

19.5

%

1992

8819

.3%

3.4%

21.6

%

1993

100

32.0

%5.

0%27

.0%

1994

103

39.8

%4.

8%4.

8%8.

8%

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edS

till

IG

radu

ated

/T

rans

ferr

edE

nrol

led

I Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

I Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

r6.

2%30

.9%

13.6

%

9.1%

17.1

%15

.2%

11.0

%21

.9%

18.3

%

7.4%

15.5

%26

.7%

13.2

%2.

6%31

.6%

9.9%

9.9%

23.5

%

16.1

%14

.9%

22.9

%

11.3

%5.

6%22

.7%

19.0

%10

.0%

33.0

%

9.9%

33.3

%

8.1%

22.2

%

8.5%

29.3

%

5.1%

20.8

%

11.8

%

22.2

%

19.5

%

5.7%

2.6%

4.9%

10.3

%

8.0%

14.8

%

16.2

%

20.7

%

30.3

%

35.5

%

23.5

%

24.1

%

29.5

%

Sou

rce:

MH

EC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

eIn

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

85

BE

ST

CO

PY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

41

86

Page 45: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

iLLL

la1

NI

%...

"

ES

SE

X C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

OLL

EC

:11

TH

E J

AM

ES

A. N

EW

FH

ER

LIB

RA

RY

NO

T T

O B

E T

AK

EN

FR

OM

TH

IS R

OO

M

Tre

nds

in R

eten

tion,

Gra

duat

ion

and

Tra

nsfe

r R

ates

WO

R-W

IC C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

OLL

EG

EA

fric

an A

mer

ican

Stu

dent

s

Per

cent

stil

l enr

olle

d, tr

ansf

erre

d, g

radu

ated

:

Coh

ort

N'

1985

15

1986

31

1987

14

1988

15

1989

10

1990

8

1991

10

1992

12

1993

9

1994

12

TW

o Y

ears

Stil

lE

nrol

led

Gra

duat

ed/

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

Thr

ee Y

ears

Fou

r Y

ears

Tra

nsfe

rred

Stil

lG

radu

ated

/IT

rans

fen-

edS

till

Gra

duat

ed/

Tra

nsfe

rred

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

rE

nrol

led

Did

Not

Tra

ns.

to 4

Yea

r26.7%

6.7%

6.7%

6.7%

6.7%

6.7%

13.3%

6.7%

6.7%

19.4%

3.2%

3.2%

1 6.1%

6.4%

3.2%

12.9%

9.7%

3.2%

'33.3%

13.3%

20.0%

13.3%

20.0%

20.0%

0.0%

20.0%

26.6%

N le

ss th

an 1

5

Sou

rce:MHEC

Enr

ollm

ent a

nd D

egre

e In

form

atio

n S

yste

ms

8742

88

Page 46: ENTIRE DOCU ENT: POOR PRINT QUALITYfiles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436223.pdffor the entering class of 1992 were Howard (43 percent), Charles (42 percent) and Frederick (40 percent).

U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)

National Library of Education (NLE)Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)

NOTICE

REPRODUCTION BASIS

IC

This document is covered by a signed "Reproduction Release(Blanket) form (on file within the ERIC system), encompassing allor classes of documents from its source organization and, therefore,does not require a "Specific Document" Release form.

This document is Federally-funded, or carries its own permission toreproduce, or is otherwise in the public domain and, therefore, maybe reproduced by ERIC without a signed Reproduction Release form(either "Specific Document" or "Blanket").

EFF-089 (9/97)