ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA...
Transcript of ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA...
OihcrV^_11L__laquo
ENSAFE INC ENVIRONMENTAL AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS
5724 Summer Trees Drive bull Memphis Tennessee 38134 bull Telephone 901-372-7962 bull Facsimile 901-372-2454 bull wwwensafecom
February 25 1999
Mr Neil Handler Remedial Project Manager USEPA Region 1 1 Congress Street Suite 1100 (HBO) Boston MA 02114
Re Stamina Mills Site TCE Spill Area Treatment System mdash Air Data Summary Report
Dear Mr Handler
In producing internal copies of this report we found that one SDG had been omitted from Appendix A EnSafe is therefore submitting two copies of this SDG as errata pages for the February 17th document
If you have any questions regarding this report please give me a call at 901372-7962
Sincerely
EnSafe Inc
by liori Anne G Technical Services
cc G Mackin Collins amp Aikman Products Co M DeStefano RIDEM A Snow EnSafe Inc C Lizotte Envirogen T Mao Trojan Technologies
Charleston bull Cincinnati bull Dallas bull Jackson TN bull Koln bull Knoxville bull Lancaster bull Memphis bull Nashville bull Norfolk bull Paducah bull Pensacola bull Raleigh
SDG E0911
Site EPA-NE Reference No 4061-Pig Data Validation Worksheet Cover Page - Page 1
REGION I ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION
The following data package has been validated
Lab Name SOWMethod No CaseProject No SDG No
Sampling Date(s) Shipping Date(s)
No of SamplesMatrix Date Recd by lab
Traffic Report Sample Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No Bottle Blank No Field Duplicate Nos PES Nos
The Region I EPA-NE Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Analyses revision was used to evaluate the data andor approved modifications to the EPA-NE Functional Guidelines were used to evaluate the data and are attached to this cover page (attach modified criteria from EPA approved QAPjP or amendment to QAPjP)
A Tier n or Tier HI evaluation was used to validate the data (circle one) If a Tier n validation with a partial Tier in was used then identify samples parameters etc that received partial Tier ffl validation
The data were evaluated based upon the following parameters
- Overall Evaluation of Data - Field Duplicates - Data Completeness (CSF Audit - Tier I) - Sensitivity Check - Preservation amp Technical Holding Times - PE SamplesAccuracy Check - GCMS amp GCECD Instrument Performance Check - Target Compound Identification - Initial amp Continuing Calibrations - Compound Quantitation and Reported -Blanks Quantitation Limits - Surrogate Compounds -TICs - Internal Standards - Semivolatile and PesticidePCB Cleanup - Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate - System Performance
Region I Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Numerical value associated with compound is an estimated quantity R - The data are rejected as unusable The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit U - Compound not detected at that numerical sample quantitation limit UJ - The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity TB BB EB - Compound detected in aqueous trip blank aqueous bottle blank or aqueous equipment blank associated with soilsediment samples
Validators Name Company Phone Number
Date Validation S Date Validation Completed
1296
The data validator generates a Data Validation Report applicable to Data Validation Tiers II and III that consists of the following components in the order specified below (Refer to Section 11 for a description of each of the Data Validation Report components)
1 Organic Regional Data AssessmentInorganic Regional Data Assessment (ORDAIRDA) Form
2 Data Validation Memorandum a Narrative b Table I-Qualifier Recommendation Summary Table c Table H-Overall Evaluation of Data d bdquo Table ffl-Tentatively Identified Compounds e Data Summary Tables
3 Standard Data Validation Worksheets a Manual b Automated Data Review Reports (ie CADRE)
4 Support Documentation a Copy of non-CLP analytical method eg DAS methods modified EPA methods b Copies of PES Score Reports Vendor PES QC Acceptance Limits c Copies of Telephone LogsCommunication Forms for
RSCC communications Requests for laboratory data resubmissionsclarifications Communications with samplers resolving sampling problems Communications with TPOLead Chemist to report contractually-deficient data for rejectionreduced payment Communications with EPA Site Manager concerning possible data rejection EPA Site Manager authorization for alternate DV tier
d Copies of data supporting recommendations for reduced payment resulting from CSF Audit andor PE sample result evaluation
e Original data to support recommendations for data rejectionnon-payment identified from Tier n or Tier ID data validation
f Copies of field sampling notes andor field report supplied by field sampler g Copies of EPA-approved amendments to QAPjP andor SAP describing modified criteria
to be used for validating site data 5 CSF Completeness Evidence Audit 6 DQO Summary Form
The data validator is responsible for implementing all corrective actions required by the contractor Lead Chemist in response to EPA-NE data validation oversight findings
1296
75 poundk
11o 8 1 cr
OJ
QQ hk Praquo ^^ i
fl ee 2
CO re
^SBSS= assess
-H C
s CD -H
Mj cr co c
L ^C oJJ
o -H
bullbull gt
5 -u u
1 i 3
0
i
g ce
CO
1 a 73
bCUu-
CE
O
CD ^ 0
-^ in
-H CE
1 CD
CJ C bullbull
U_ 0) 1
ce
2 cebullo e
H
5 O
T^73
lt
eg mdashi c u- CD o
CO 3 -Hcr CT 4-1
in
cr
CO re
4gt w c
a o si
lppoundcoS-C2-
2 8 8 s
s-t IS|-3lt^3
Q1 CD ^O
C 0 ltTbull-1 mdash( 03
^ J Q gt~ 3
E shyi inCO CD
CO C ~O
co ox
CO O 4J
cu c wgtshy CO E
1 Q
Q (O O Q u rf D U ^
CL o bullbull CD ltmdash CO
CO
^ Co ^ o jj D NC CD E
evt -H m
CC U 01
^^
f O
^T lti
ltJ)
(
O cr
lt^
if)
E80
1Hceo
O
1 1
ce
sect deg
c bullmdash
w
si ce CU
ff
^x CJ CCD
CD -U
i
o a -H
raquoHa
-w c o
l~ C
o cu E
S
Q mdash 73
E
OO
CO aJ
E -w D
CO C
CO CU
E H ) t U
CO Q1
A ce
I S 2 ^ O ex Q
CU
CDt-i
jjCO
CO
CU CD -J CC
JJ CO CU CO -D CO CO
tshy Ushy --4 D D CD mdash
-C 0 u X C CD 0)
ce 4) 1)
sectraquo
CO E -fc-J CD JJ 3 CU mdashlt J-J CO CU
O S CO CO CO
ai-l ro C
CO R _
|
00
CO U ca
co rs c3
V
O secten
bullo ee s u
1 en CO H
ec
cu en en ec
re co 0
o 53
S ow
C -Z
o u u w
00mdashc g s
12 e3
gt laquo 00
bull
Isect CO
o CO
CO U
S deg 73 =
a Q
73
w
eObullJ
xgt -2 Ui C8
gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re
O CX Q 03
CO O
I a gtW O 73
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB
COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT
Organic Fractions
Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received
Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date
1296
pound
u cs a
bullS9 8 5 5Q
1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P
o C Te O
5 CJ 22 2
11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5
= a bdquobull re
1311
10 (J bullmdash
llsl
u mdash u = h w fcu
Si U) IS) win
C3 O
5 C5 U
o ri
J o ST r
gt lt2-2 K
15mdash U a a u D
CO M
II
bullo o
Os 0gt ON
J5 _s 73
lt
o u to OJ
impo
und
Nn
bull3 bull8 tJ St= t
J3 S o
E To pound s E
co CO laquo
e
n _in
u u
c Cl it
Perf
onnn
iSlaquo Ogt i
C ^ Z bulls S s m
poun
d N
n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00
c o =3 CO
yen5 bull Js= _e
z I bullo
fj bullB
U
1 5 Ib i
spound F
c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W
y ee IZ = i telt J5
yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0
O bulliC a I I deg S | a
i rl
o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I
mo U^ ce
P 1 I amp
Vo
latil
e it
Per
forn
in
Sem
irola
tlle
^ w amp5 1 o
Q V) 5 o u
C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI
is
6
so
-fc o
ij13 Q
amp Si
V
trade U
c fO
c3 -2 e3 o
o
C3
es a i
^05
CC
es
u
2 O
S
Q a =u gt255
s5
1
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
SDG E0911
Site EPA-NE Reference No 4061-Pig Data Validation Worksheet Cover Page - Page 1
REGION I ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION
The following data package has been validated
Lab Name SOWMethod No CaseProject No SDG No
Sampling Date(s) Shipping Date(s)
No of SamplesMatrix Date Recd by lab
Traffic Report Sample Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No Bottle Blank No Field Duplicate Nos PES Nos
The Region I EPA-NE Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Analyses revision was used to evaluate the data andor approved modifications to the EPA-NE Functional Guidelines were used to evaluate the data and are attached to this cover page (attach modified criteria from EPA approved QAPjP or amendment to QAPjP)
A Tier n or Tier HI evaluation was used to validate the data (circle one) If a Tier n validation with a partial Tier in was used then identify samples parameters etc that received partial Tier ffl validation
The data were evaluated based upon the following parameters
- Overall Evaluation of Data - Field Duplicates - Data Completeness (CSF Audit - Tier I) - Sensitivity Check - Preservation amp Technical Holding Times - PE SamplesAccuracy Check - GCMS amp GCECD Instrument Performance Check - Target Compound Identification - Initial amp Continuing Calibrations - Compound Quantitation and Reported -Blanks Quantitation Limits - Surrogate Compounds -TICs - Internal Standards - Semivolatile and PesticidePCB Cleanup - Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate - System Performance
Region I Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Numerical value associated with compound is an estimated quantity R - The data are rejected as unusable The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit U - Compound not detected at that numerical sample quantitation limit UJ - The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity TB BB EB - Compound detected in aqueous trip blank aqueous bottle blank or aqueous equipment blank associated with soilsediment samples
Validators Name Company Phone Number
Date Validation S Date Validation Completed
1296
The data validator generates a Data Validation Report applicable to Data Validation Tiers II and III that consists of the following components in the order specified below (Refer to Section 11 for a description of each of the Data Validation Report components)
1 Organic Regional Data AssessmentInorganic Regional Data Assessment (ORDAIRDA) Form
2 Data Validation Memorandum a Narrative b Table I-Qualifier Recommendation Summary Table c Table H-Overall Evaluation of Data d bdquo Table ffl-Tentatively Identified Compounds e Data Summary Tables
3 Standard Data Validation Worksheets a Manual b Automated Data Review Reports (ie CADRE)
4 Support Documentation a Copy of non-CLP analytical method eg DAS methods modified EPA methods b Copies of PES Score Reports Vendor PES QC Acceptance Limits c Copies of Telephone LogsCommunication Forms for
RSCC communications Requests for laboratory data resubmissionsclarifications Communications with samplers resolving sampling problems Communications with TPOLead Chemist to report contractually-deficient data for rejectionreduced payment Communications with EPA Site Manager concerning possible data rejection EPA Site Manager authorization for alternate DV tier
d Copies of data supporting recommendations for reduced payment resulting from CSF Audit andor PE sample result evaluation
e Original data to support recommendations for data rejectionnon-payment identified from Tier n or Tier ID data validation
f Copies of field sampling notes andor field report supplied by field sampler g Copies of EPA-approved amendments to QAPjP andor SAP describing modified criteria
to be used for validating site data 5 CSF Completeness Evidence Audit 6 DQO Summary Form
The data validator is responsible for implementing all corrective actions required by the contractor Lead Chemist in response to EPA-NE data validation oversight findings
1296
75 poundk
11o 8 1 cr
OJ
QQ hk Praquo ^^ i
fl ee 2
CO re
^SBSS= assess
-H C
s CD -H
Mj cr co c
L ^C oJJ
o -H
bullbull gt
5 -u u
1 i 3
0
i
g ce
CO
1 a 73
bCUu-
CE
O
CD ^ 0
-^ in
-H CE
1 CD
CJ C bullbull
U_ 0) 1
ce
2 cebullo e
H
5 O
T^73
lt
eg mdashi c u- CD o
CO 3 -Hcr CT 4-1
in
cr
CO re
4gt w c
a o si
lppoundcoS-C2-
2 8 8 s
s-t IS|-3lt^3
Q1 CD ^O
C 0 ltTbull-1 mdash( 03
^ J Q gt~ 3
E shyi inCO CD
CO C ~O
co ox
CO O 4J
cu c wgtshy CO E
1 Q
Q (O O Q u rf D U ^
CL o bullbull CD ltmdash CO
CO
^ Co ^ o jj D NC CD E
evt -H m
CC U 01
^^
f O
^T lti
ltJ)
(
O cr
lt^
if)
E80
1Hceo
O
1 1
ce
sect deg
c bullmdash
w
si ce CU
ff
^x CJ CCD
CD -U
i
o a -H
raquoHa
-w c o
l~ C
o cu E
S
Q mdash 73
E
OO
CO aJ
E -w D
CO C
CO CU
E H ) t U
CO Q1
A ce
I S 2 ^ O ex Q
CU
CDt-i
jjCO
CO
CU CD -J CC
JJ CO CU CO -D CO CO
tshy Ushy --4 D D CD mdash
-C 0 u X C CD 0)
ce 4) 1)
sectraquo
CO E -fc-J CD JJ 3 CU mdashlt J-J CO CU
O S CO CO CO
ai-l ro C
CO R _
|
00
CO U ca
co rs c3
V
O secten
bullo ee s u
1 en CO H
ec
cu en en ec
re co 0
o 53
S ow
C -Z
o u u w
00mdashc g s
12 e3
gt laquo 00
bull
Isect CO
o CO
CO U
S deg 73 =
a Q
73
w
eObullJ
xgt -2 Ui C8
gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re
O CX Q 03
CO O
I a gtW O 73
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB
COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT
Organic Fractions
Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received
Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date
1296
pound
u cs a
bullS9 8 5 5Q
1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P
o C Te O
5 CJ 22 2
11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5
= a bdquobull re
1311
10 (J bullmdash
llsl
u mdash u = h w fcu
Si U) IS) win
C3 O
5 C5 U
o ri
J o ST r
gt lt2-2 K
15mdash U a a u D
CO M
II
bullo o
Os 0gt ON
J5 _s 73
lt
o u to OJ
impo
und
Nn
bull3 bull8 tJ St= t
J3 S o
E To pound s E
co CO laquo
e
n _in
u u
c Cl it
Perf
onnn
iSlaquo Ogt i
C ^ Z bulls S s m
poun
d N
n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00
c o =3 CO
yen5 bull Js= _e
z I bullo
fj bullB
U
1 5 Ib i
spound F
c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W
y ee IZ = i telt J5
yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0
O bulliC a I I deg S | a
i rl
o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I
mo U^ ce
P 1 I amp
Vo
latil
e it
Per
forn
in
Sem
irola
tlle
^ w amp5 1 o
Q V) 5 o u
C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI
is
6
so
-fc o
ij13 Q
amp Si
V
trade U
c fO
c3 -2 e3 o
o
C3
es a i
^05
CC
es
u
2 O
S
Q a =u gt255
s5
1
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Site EPA-NE Reference No 4061-Pig Data Validation Worksheet Cover Page - Page 1
REGION I ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION
The following data package has been validated
Lab Name SOWMethod No CaseProject No SDG No
Sampling Date(s) Shipping Date(s)
No of SamplesMatrix Date Recd by lab
Traffic Report Sample Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No Bottle Blank No Field Duplicate Nos PES Nos
The Region I EPA-NE Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Analyses revision was used to evaluate the data andor approved modifications to the EPA-NE Functional Guidelines were used to evaluate the data and are attached to this cover page (attach modified criteria from EPA approved QAPjP or amendment to QAPjP)
A Tier n or Tier HI evaluation was used to validate the data (circle one) If a Tier n validation with a partial Tier in was used then identify samples parameters etc that received partial Tier ffl validation
The data were evaluated based upon the following parameters
- Overall Evaluation of Data - Field Duplicates - Data Completeness (CSF Audit - Tier I) - Sensitivity Check - Preservation amp Technical Holding Times - PE SamplesAccuracy Check - GCMS amp GCECD Instrument Performance Check - Target Compound Identification - Initial amp Continuing Calibrations - Compound Quantitation and Reported -Blanks Quantitation Limits - Surrogate Compounds -TICs - Internal Standards - Semivolatile and PesticidePCB Cleanup - Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate - System Performance
Region I Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Numerical value associated with compound is an estimated quantity R - The data are rejected as unusable The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit U - Compound not detected at that numerical sample quantitation limit UJ - The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity TB BB EB - Compound detected in aqueous trip blank aqueous bottle blank or aqueous equipment blank associated with soilsediment samples
Validators Name Company Phone Number
Date Validation S Date Validation Completed
1296
The data validator generates a Data Validation Report applicable to Data Validation Tiers II and III that consists of the following components in the order specified below (Refer to Section 11 for a description of each of the Data Validation Report components)
1 Organic Regional Data AssessmentInorganic Regional Data Assessment (ORDAIRDA) Form
2 Data Validation Memorandum a Narrative b Table I-Qualifier Recommendation Summary Table c Table H-Overall Evaluation of Data d bdquo Table ffl-Tentatively Identified Compounds e Data Summary Tables
3 Standard Data Validation Worksheets a Manual b Automated Data Review Reports (ie CADRE)
4 Support Documentation a Copy of non-CLP analytical method eg DAS methods modified EPA methods b Copies of PES Score Reports Vendor PES QC Acceptance Limits c Copies of Telephone LogsCommunication Forms for
RSCC communications Requests for laboratory data resubmissionsclarifications Communications with samplers resolving sampling problems Communications with TPOLead Chemist to report contractually-deficient data for rejectionreduced payment Communications with EPA Site Manager concerning possible data rejection EPA Site Manager authorization for alternate DV tier
d Copies of data supporting recommendations for reduced payment resulting from CSF Audit andor PE sample result evaluation
e Original data to support recommendations for data rejectionnon-payment identified from Tier n or Tier ID data validation
f Copies of field sampling notes andor field report supplied by field sampler g Copies of EPA-approved amendments to QAPjP andor SAP describing modified criteria
to be used for validating site data 5 CSF Completeness Evidence Audit 6 DQO Summary Form
The data validator is responsible for implementing all corrective actions required by the contractor Lead Chemist in response to EPA-NE data validation oversight findings
1296
75 poundk
11o 8 1 cr
OJ
QQ hk Praquo ^^ i
fl ee 2
CO re
^SBSS= assess
-H C
s CD -H
Mj cr co c
L ^C oJJ
o -H
bullbull gt
5 -u u
1 i 3
0
i
g ce
CO
1 a 73
bCUu-
CE
O
CD ^ 0
-^ in
-H CE
1 CD
CJ C bullbull
U_ 0) 1
ce
2 cebullo e
H
5 O
T^73
lt
eg mdashi c u- CD o
CO 3 -Hcr CT 4-1
in
cr
CO re
4gt w c
a o si
lppoundcoS-C2-
2 8 8 s
s-t IS|-3lt^3
Q1 CD ^O
C 0 ltTbull-1 mdash( 03
^ J Q gt~ 3
E shyi inCO CD
CO C ~O
co ox
CO O 4J
cu c wgtshy CO E
1 Q
Q (O O Q u rf D U ^
CL o bullbull CD ltmdash CO
CO
^ Co ^ o jj D NC CD E
evt -H m
CC U 01
^^
f O
^T lti
ltJ)
(
O cr
lt^
if)
E80
1Hceo
O
1 1
ce
sect deg
c bullmdash
w
si ce CU
ff
^x CJ CCD
CD -U
i
o a -H
raquoHa
-w c o
l~ C
o cu E
S
Q mdash 73
E
OO
CO aJ
E -w D
CO C
CO CU
E H ) t U
CO Q1
A ce
I S 2 ^ O ex Q
CU
CDt-i
jjCO
CO
CU CD -J CC
JJ CO CU CO -D CO CO
tshy Ushy --4 D D CD mdash
-C 0 u X C CD 0)
ce 4) 1)
sectraquo
CO E -fc-J CD JJ 3 CU mdashlt J-J CO CU
O S CO CO CO
ai-l ro C
CO R _
|
00
CO U ca
co rs c3
V
O secten
bullo ee s u
1 en CO H
ec
cu en en ec
re co 0
o 53
S ow
C -Z
o u u w
00mdashc g s
12 e3
gt laquo 00
bull
Isect CO
o CO
CO U
S deg 73 =
a Q
73
w
eObullJ
xgt -2 Ui C8
gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re
O CX Q 03
CO O
I a gtW O 73
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB
COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT
Organic Fractions
Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received
Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date
1296
pound
u cs a
bullS9 8 5 5Q
1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P
o C Te O
5 CJ 22 2
11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5
= a bdquobull re
1311
10 (J bullmdash
llsl
u mdash u = h w fcu
Si U) IS) win
C3 O
5 C5 U
o ri
J o ST r
gt lt2-2 K
15mdash U a a u D
CO M
II
bullo o
Os 0gt ON
J5 _s 73
lt
o u to OJ
impo
und
Nn
bull3 bull8 tJ St= t
J3 S o
E To pound s E
co CO laquo
e
n _in
u u
c Cl it
Perf
onnn
iSlaquo Ogt i
C ^ Z bulls S s m
poun
d N
n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00
c o =3 CO
yen5 bull Js= _e
z I bullo
fj bullB
U
1 5 Ib i
spound F
c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W
y ee IZ = i telt J5
yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0
O bulliC a I I deg S | a
i rl
o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I
mo U^ ce
P 1 I amp
Vo
latil
e it
Per
forn
in
Sem
irola
tlle
^ w amp5 1 o
Q V) 5 o u
C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI
is
6
so
-fc o
ij13 Q
amp Si
V
trade U
c fO
c3 -2 e3 o
o
C3
es a i
^05
CC
es
u
2 O
S
Q a =u gt255
s5
1
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
The data validator generates a Data Validation Report applicable to Data Validation Tiers II and III that consists of the following components in the order specified below (Refer to Section 11 for a description of each of the Data Validation Report components)
1 Organic Regional Data AssessmentInorganic Regional Data Assessment (ORDAIRDA) Form
2 Data Validation Memorandum a Narrative b Table I-Qualifier Recommendation Summary Table c Table H-Overall Evaluation of Data d bdquo Table ffl-Tentatively Identified Compounds e Data Summary Tables
3 Standard Data Validation Worksheets a Manual b Automated Data Review Reports (ie CADRE)
4 Support Documentation a Copy of non-CLP analytical method eg DAS methods modified EPA methods b Copies of PES Score Reports Vendor PES QC Acceptance Limits c Copies of Telephone LogsCommunication Forms for
RSCC communications Requests for laboratory data resubmissionsclarifications Communications with samplers resolving sampling problems Communications with TPOLead Chemist to report contractually-deficient data for rejectionreduced payment Communications with EPA Site Manager concerning possible data rejection EPA Site Manager authorization for alternate DV tier
d Copies of data supporting recommendations for reduced payment resulting from CSF Audit andor PE sample result evaluation
e Original data to support recommendations for data rejectionnon-payment identified from Tier n or Tier ID data validation
f Copies of field sampling notes andor field report supplied by field sampler g Copies of EPA-approved amendments to QAPjP andor SAP describing modified criteria
to be used for validating site data 5 CSF Completeness Evidence Audit 6 DQO Summary Form
The data validator is responsible for implementing all corrective actions required by the contractor Lead Chemist in response to EPA-NE data validation oversight findings
1296
75 poundk
11o 8 1 cr
OJ
QQ hk Praquo ^^ i
fl ee 2
CO re
^SBSS= assess
-H C
s CD -H
Mj cr co c
L ^C oJJ
o -H
bullbull gt
5 -u u
1 i 3
0
i
g ce
CO
1 a 73
bCUu-
CE
O
CD ^ 0
-^ in
-H CE
1 CD
CJ C bullbull
U_ 0) 1
ce
2 cebullo e
H
5 O
T^73
lt
eg mdashi c u- CD o
CO 3 -Hcr CT 4-1
in
cr
CO re
4gt w c
a o si
lppoundcoS-C2-
2 8 8 s
s-t IS|-3lt^3
Q1 CD ^O
C 0 ltTbull-1 mdash( 03
^ J Q gt~ 3
E shyi inCO CD
CO C ~O
co ox
CO O 4J
cu c wgtshy CO E
1 Q
Q (O O Q u rf D U ^
CL o bullbull CD ltmdash CO
CO
^ Co ^ o jj D NC CD E
evt -H m
CC U 01
^^
f O
^T lti
ltJ)
(
O cr
lt^
if)
E80
1Hceo
O
1 1
ce
sect deg
c bullmdash
w
si ce CU
ff
^x CJ CCD
CD -U
i
o a -H
raquoHa
-w c o
l~ C
o cu E
S
Q mdash 73
E
OO
CO aJ
E -w D
CO C
CO CU
E H ) t U
CO Q1
A ce
I S 2 ^ O ex Q
CU
CDt-i
jjCO
CO
CU CD -J CC
JJ CO CU CO -D CO CO
tshy Ushy --4 D D CD mdash
-C 0 u X C CD 0)
ce 4) 1)
sectraquo
CO E -fc-J CD JJ 3 CU mdashlt J-J CO CU
O S CO CO CO
ai-l ro C
CO R _
|
00
CO U ca
co rs c3
V
O secten
bullo ee s u
1 en CO H
ec
cu en en ec
re co 0
o 53
S ow
C -Z
o u u w
00mdashc g s
12 e3
gt laquo 00
bull
Isect CO
o CO
CO U
S deg 73 =
a Q
73
w
eObullJ
xgt -2 Ui C8
gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re
O CX Q 03
CO O
I a gtW O 73
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB
COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT
Organic Fractions
Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received
Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date
1296
pound
u cs a
bullS9 8 5 5Q
1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P
o C Te O
5 CJ 22 2
11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5
= a bdquobull re
1311
10 (J bullmdash
llsl
u mdash u = h w fcu
Si U) IS) win
C3 O
5 C5 U
o ri
J o ST r
gt lt2-2 K
15mdash U a a u D
CO M
II
bullo o
Os 0gt ON
J5 _s 73
lt
o u to OJ
impo
und
Nn
bull3 bull8 tJ St= t
J3 S o
E To pound s E
co CO laquo
e
n _in
u u
c Cl it
Perf
onnn
iSlaquo Ogt i
C ^ Z bulls S s m
poun
d N
n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00
c o =3 CO
yen5 bull Js= _e
z I bullo
fj bullB
U
1 5 Ib i
spound F
c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W
y ee IZ = i telt J5
yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0
O bulliC a I I deg S | a
i rl
o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I
mo U^ ce
P 1 I amp
Vo
latil
e it
Per
forn
in
Sem
irola
tlle
^ w amp5 1 o
Q V) 5 o u
C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI
is
6
so
-fc o
ij13 Q
amp Si
V
trade U
c fO
c3 -2 e3 o
o
C3
es a i
^05
CC
es
u
2 O
S
Q a =u gt255
s5
1
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
75 poundk
11o 8 1 cr
OJ
QQ hk Praquo ^^ i
fl ee 2
CO re
^SBSS= assess
-H C
s CD -H
Mj cr co c
L ^C oJJ
o -H
bullbull gt
5 -u u
1 i 3
0
i
g ce
CO
1 a 73
bCUu-
CE
O
CD ^ 0
-^ in
-H CE
1 CD
CJ C bullbull
U_ 0) 1
ce
2 cebullo e
H
5 O
T^73
lt
eg mdashi c u- CD o
CO 3 -Hcr CT 4-1
in
cr
CO re
4gt w c
a o si
lppoundcoS-C2-
2 8 8 s
s-t IS|-3lt^3
Q1 CD ^O
C 0 ltTbull-1 mdash( 03
^ J Q gt~ 3
E shyi inCO CD
CO C ~O
co ox
CO O 4J
cu c wgtshy CO E
1 Q
Q (O O Q u rf D U ^
CL o bullbull CD ltmdash CO
CO
^ Co ^ o jj D NC CD E
evt -H m
CC U 01
^^
f O
^T lti
ltJ)
(
O cr
lt^
if)
E80
1Hceo
O
1 1
ce
sect deg
c bullmdash
w
si ce CU
ff
^x CJ CCD
CD -U
i
o a -H
raquoHa
-w c o
l~ C
o cu E
S
Q mdash 73
E
OO
CO aJ
E -w D
CO C
CO CU
E H ) t U
CO Q1
A ce
I S 2 ^ O ex Q
CU
CDt-i
jjCO
CO
CU CD -J CC
JJ CO CU CO -D CO CO
tshy Ushy --4 D D CD mdash
-C 0 u X C CD 0)
ce 4) 1)
sectraquo
CO E -fc-J CD JJ 3 CU mdashlt J-J CO CU
O S CO CO CO
ai-l ro C
CO R _
|
00
CO U ca
co rs c3
V
O secten
bullo ee s u
1 en CO H
ec
cu en en ec
re co 0
o 53
S ow
C -Z
o u u w
00mdashc g s
12 e3
gt laquo 00
bull
Isect CO
o CO
CO U
S deg 73 =
a Q
73
w
eObullJ
xgt -2 Ui C8
gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re
O CX Q 03
CO O
I a gtW O 73
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB
COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT
Organic Fractions
Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received
Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date
1296
pound
u cs a
bullS9 8 5 5Q
1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P
o C Te O
5 CJ 22 2
11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5
= a bdquobull re
1311
10 (J bullmdash
llsl
u mdash u = h w fcu
Si U) IS) win
C3 O
5 C5 U
o ri
J o ST r
gt lt2-2 K
15mdash U a a u D
CO M
II
bullo o
Os 0gt ON
J5 _s 73
lt
o u to OJ
impo
und
Nn
bull3 bull8 tJ St= t
J3 S o
E To pound s E
co CO laquo
e
n _in
u u
c Cl it
Perf
onnn
iSlaquo Ogt i
C ^ Z bulls S s m
poun
d N
n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00
c o =3 CO
yen5 bull Js= _e
z I bullo
fj bullB
U
1 5 Ib i
spound F
c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W
y ee IZ = i telt J5
yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0
O bulliC a I I deg S | a
i rl
o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I
mo U^ ce
P 1 I amp
Vo
latil
e it
Per
forn
in
Sem
irola
tlle
^ w amp5 1 o
Q V) 5 o u
C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI
is
6
so
-fc o
ij13 Q
amp Si
V
trade U
c fO
c3 -2 e3 o
o
C3
es a i
^05
CC
es
u
2 O
S
Q a =u gt255
s5
1
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
ai-l ro C
CO R _
|
00
CO U ca
co rs c3
V
O secten
bullo ee s u
1 en CO H
ec
cu en en ec
re co 0
o 53
S ow
C -Z
o u u w
00mdashc g s
12 e3
gt laquo 00
bull
Isect CO
o CO
CO U
S deg 73 =
a Q
73
w
eObullJ
xgt -2 Ui C8
gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re
O CX Q 03
CO O
I a gtW O 73
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB
COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT
Organic Fractions
Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received
Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date
1296
pound
u cs a
bullS9 8 5 5Q
1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P
o C Te O
5 CJ 22 2
11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5
= a bdquobull re
1311
10 (J bullmdash
llsl
u mdash u = h w fcu
Si U) IS) win
C3 O
5 C5 U
o ri
J o ST r
gt lt2-2 K
15mdash U a a u D
CO M
II
bullo o
Os 0gt ON
J5 _s 73
lt
o u to OJ
impo
und
Nn
bull3 bull8 tJ St= t
J3 S o
E To pound s E
co CO laquo
e
n _in
u u
c Cl it
Perf
onnn
iSlaquo Ogt i
C ^ Z bulls S s m
poun
d N
n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00
c o =3 CO
yen5 bull Js= _e
z I bullo
fj bullB
U
1 5 Ib i
spound F
c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W
y ee IZ = i telt J5
yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0
O bulliC a I I deg S | a
i rl
o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I
mo U^ ce
P 1 I amp
Vo
latil
e it
Per
forn
in
Sem
irola
tlle
^ w amp5 1 o
Q V) 5 o u
C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI
is
6
so
-fc o
ij13 Q
amp Si
V
trade U
c fO
c3 -2 e3 o
o
C3
es a i
^05
CC
es
u
2 O
S
Q a =u gt255
s5
1
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB
COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT
Organic Fractions
Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received
Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date
1296
pound
u cs a
bullS9 8 5 5Q
1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P
o C Te O
5 CJ 22 2
11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5
= a bdquobull re
1311
10 (J bullmdash
llsl
u mdash u = h w fcu
Si U) IS) win
C3 O
5 C5 U
o ri
J o ST r
gt lt2-2 K
15mdash U a a u D
CO M
II
bullo o
Os 0gt ON
J5 _s 73
lt
o u to OJ
impo
und
Nn
bull3 bull8 tJ St= t
J3 S o
E To pound s E
co CO laquo
e
n _in
u u
c Cl it
Perf
onnn
iSlaquo Ogt i
C ^ Z bulls S s m
poun
d N
n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00
c o =3 CO
yen5 bull Js= _e
z I bullo
fj bullB
U
1 5 Ib i
spound F
c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W
y ee IZ = i telt J5
yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0
O bulliC a I I deg S | a
i rl
o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I
mo U^ ce
P 1 I amp
Vo
latil
e it
Per
forn
in
Sem
irola
tlle
^ w amp5 1 o
Q V) 5 o u
C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI
is
6
so
-fc o
ij13 Q
amp Si
V
trade U
c fO
c3 -2 e3 o
o
C3
es a i
^05
CC
es
u
2 O
S
Q a =u gt255
s5
1
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
pound
u cs a
bullS9 8 5 5Q
1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P
o C Te O
5 CJ 22 2
11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5
= a bdquobull re
1311
10 (J bullmdash
llsl
u mdash u = h w fcu
Si U) IS) win
C3 O
5 C5 U
o ri
J o ST r
gt lt2-2 K
15mdash U a a u D
CO M
II
bullo o
Os 0gt ON
J5 _s 73
lt
o u to OJ
impo
und
Nn
bull3 bull8 tJ St= t
J3 S o
E To pound s E
co CO laquo
e
n _in
u u
c Cl it
Perf
onnn
iSlaquo Ogt i
C ^ Z bulls S s m
poun
d N
n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00
c o =3 CO
yen5 bull Js= _e
z I bullo
fj bullB
U
1 5 Ib i
spound F
c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W
y ee IZ = i telt J5
yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0
O bulliC a I I deg S | a
i rl
o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I
mo U^ ce
P 1 I amp
Vo
latil
e it
Per
forn
in
Sem
irola
tlle
^ w amp5 1 o
Q V) 5 o u
C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI
is
6
so
-fc o
ij13 Q
amp Si
V
trade U
c fO
c3 -2 e3 o
o
C3
es a i
^05
CC
es
u
2 O
S
Q a =u gt255
s5
1
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
bullo o
Os 0gt ON
J5 _s 73
lt
o u to OJ
impo
und
Nn
bull3 bull8 tJ St= t
J3 S o
E To pound s E
co CO laquo
e
n _in
u u
c Cl it
Perf
onnn
iSlaquo Ogt i
C ^ Z bulls S s m
poun
d N
n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00
c o =3 CO
yen5 bull Js= _e
z I bullo
fj bullB
U
1 5 Ib i
spound F
c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W
y ee IZ = i telt J5
yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0
O bulliC a I I deg S | a
i rl
o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I
mo U^ ce
P 1 I amp
Vo
latil
e it
Per
forn
in
Sem
irola
tlle
^ w amp5 1 o
Q V) 5 o u
C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI
is
6
so
-fc o
ij13 Q
amp Si
V
trade U
c fO
c3 -2 e3 o
o
C3
es a i
^05
CC
es
u
2 O
S
Q a =u gt255
s5
1
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
so
-fc o
ij13 Q
amp Si
V
trade U
c fO
c3 -2 e3 o
o
C3
es a i
^05
CC
es
u
2 O
S
Q a =u gt255
s5
1
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
^s bullC
G2O
ca
I Q
o
CO
n
CO
0
cs u
3 o
CO
^3
re
re
cs
CO
O
ei ca -a u
bulla
i
fc 2ipound
O u CO
bull3
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
oo 5
o3 a
bull o 53y 2
I 5
a 3 o U
o U
C =
II raquou 13
Jpound
re 5
bullI 3 5
gtraquoSlaquoa
S
5 h
TS 2
^12S
S
O
63
I I re
R
o o
55 G ogt
n en
C5 = OJ
TB U sectbull a s
a a
Jea
Si bull=
bull-bullbull-J
S 5
laquo C3
A C3 -J
-lt
bulls^bullc 52 B
bullI
Usect
aE
V
u ce Q
isectn-s raquou
e g
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Ishy
=
lt
I U
rj K
o c iS o U
^ ca la en
R Ji amp a So
O U II
C55
CO
a O 5
S o
^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu
l a S
e
o U g
I
r O To^o a
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
u re H u u CO
CX bullg
o
TO
CA
Si 4)
O o
bulla
o a o u
CO 00 o
C8
V)
J3
U
u Lgt 5 5
U 0gt o 15
pound3 gt
s
u
u Cpound 5 pound
4 pound
osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO
CO C
o gtCO CM u ^ s m
g en
Tol
uene
-tig OO
11 o
V
Z
R
ecov
ery
i1o u 1 oo ^ oo
J
O
I 13 1^
bullB O 1
a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1
C O oO
i
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
V
amp0^ AfV o
ltigt
u R
aU CX
2 S
o -f^
re
tc
bulla
o
s oo o
(A
O u CM
3
^ o C3
5 a ea
u o =i e CA
m-O
O
5 Z pound a
gt CO o
laquo
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
e TJ lt
2 2 0) 1ampS W
~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M
c B CO bull llt CT) Cu
^ r0u u C3
u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy
2
1 u
Rkrj
111 V G^gt
6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO
a n campgt
U8 3 -g c amp
2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt
u 22
|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu
ufe 2 i bull= CO
^o ^ o CM CO QJ
S 5 gUa E
n lt Q ^ u -o
rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj
TT
oa - 2 6 -~
Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT
w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM
3
lt ^ o SO
eten
tion
i1
111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]
Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
so u
3 nsectre
U a
c u u
Co
ra
on
e o
re
re
O U
U CO a
J 73
a 5
U
tt
Q Q
a CO
x 2 U
^OCO
- s CJ
73 U O
laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2
ltI mdash 03
s s Q
u2 55 en
Par
ame
Com
pou
2S ra C8
12 t5 CO 13 ugt
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
s V~7 h 7
e cr
iteria
mdashi
g f e IBt amp5
Ja lt3f
CO a o O5 X
Ol 8 E ex s bullj
o Qla CO
^o vf S poundJ 03 3
Is amp3 VO
n0) CO bullbull
aC TO 1)
a n O j CO 0 0 ^
mdash bullbull
S ogt bulla o a
H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E
CO 2 o pound2 pound2
JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn
Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)
00 laquo K _O
u M O TEL 3Q bulla
u Qu s ~h ^ in o
lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS
CM UV
a I 13ki 0
t sCfl laquo1
3
fr io
Qft s laquo E = u
bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ
oo
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
zzzz ZZZ
S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q
U ltcc
poundJ1) 5C
_c OJ
u_ ul ^ O
KO CK
ult | i
IS O
ulsl
clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg
^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt
re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ
EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g
O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai
Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o
bulllaquo L^
u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE
3 spound
_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^
ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C
and
or degsect
1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo
^ 5 S
1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si
^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1
laquo I HiwS ipound
= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^
-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg
j-O
os mdash
1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx
t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2
bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co
j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg
gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC
bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt
i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg
bull= S D-g^
^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w
1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O
ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re
ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Z
fc
bull
cJgt ~
Up
HZlt
D Z ^ )
O pound3
S z o bull3 u
1lt
iSZ
u CO
S s O
U H |
i d 2
^ S
_re C u
ubullo
-
CO poundbull2 CM
ss W o amp CO o Z
docoS2bullJUH
shy
^ H Z O U Q Z
gt DO o e CO
on 0)
Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg
fii
1lt5 1
v
mdasho
S
85ltj=60 _
33
cZ
iu
S e to co
S CO
laquo cc
ij
4gt
E 2 CO Cu
tJ
O U
-^ ^mdash
y( gtigt=^
shyH
s s1 i^ D
bulli
~ O
1 2 rjj O
I o cs o
bull5 5 a
^ ^ J 2
CoCu
U
to W
^o B
S a
5c OJ
f^^ o
^c _raquolt
S
|gtlt
i shyA^Vr
i
j
uoCJ
CO
COs
u o
t-gt CO
^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt
CJ
cc
O
O M
3 x a U gt O laquo tS
21 U Pshy
R S
I
u Cs9
U
U
1 U u
ISJ COlt U
b
Q CO
i en
1gt
2
i Cu
0
ec i
O
ca 5
o E pound lt
o
o H
bbulls 1 pound
jraquo fc3^
II
4032
^ ^
AS
sect
1 lto 00
raquo
IIO0Zltu j^j
ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^
poundbraquo-iltgH
Ht255
bull o
lt
w-S a
sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt
o o rrj deg
c o o^(
H i23
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
o cgt
I2 ci
re ltu Q CW
W gt
bulla gt
ET o ea
o V re
JO
re
u
a a
opoundshy
o u
fi
s
en
a
o U
cs en
CO
13
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
4 OCL
y o
18re kin bullmdash
gtbull ~Obull0
CT O blaquo SD
u S ^ gtNi
bulllaquo o ^
315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt
reu pound
ii ce Q
1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0
o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l
shy
i CB
1 5
1 ^bullbull
^^fc
^^f~+
w
sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s
pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e
bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ
1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s
v^c
C^~
N ^shy
^ lt
^ S5 laquoo
^L ^3
x
-~-gt
^_^
u1)bulli ^ lt shyo
S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si
i = 5 i rr s e x deg
degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy
reo M raquogt2
V^shy
ltbullc^
bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3
255 ^ e O sect S C
C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)
11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c
to
Ogt
o
famp
U
fts
gt
sectbulla
^
tpound c
x 2 J
bullc 3amp
sect5 3
1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo
i J
1 i i a t S u |
o o gt I sectgt
1mill1 1 iii
V
r^^
O ec 12
tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
4J
Vj^
CQbulla co
CO
at w gt ^ 2pound5
^1
U H
Ot
o u o
zEd
u gt H
S Z
P gt X
u
c JU o pound COtn
u CO
-
B O U
00
ggt
u H laquon u
bull3 ltij
o ON lts
J3 U
CO
Q
u o
bulla 3
g o U
Par
amet
er
| 3 z v 5
CO CO
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
ks e
ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o
is in lt
I o
bullg bullCO
u
gen1 bulla
o DEL ^ E
5 o u
2 K H Uu U
U a en
3 81 gt1 C
1QJ
bulla g- 4J
tf
C ^ iC CJ
E
cr O t) 2 K bullM3
o w bullo o S S CO l4_
CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ
E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e
Vs r S O laquo
c 13
is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=
w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt
5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo
u w o1 ~ u - ^t
fo -j S3
vCQ ^
I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO
CO lt )
^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra
i a a OU
C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255
1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U
bullo bull X 5 u 73
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt
REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included
Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)
~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab
Traffic Report Nos
Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos
SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Cements
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer Date
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X DATA COMPLETENESS
KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria
HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE
ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
5amp01D 6
1
YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are
estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REG I OK X Data Review worksheets
I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn
ACTIONS
If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow
For Positive Results
Accent Estimate Relect fRi
Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi
Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence
A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No
B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx
C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No
D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc
E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No
If No
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION Z Data Review Worksheet
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks
1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX
DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS
3Mfc fc
L 715-
2 EquipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS
3 Frequency Requirements
A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No
B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No
If No
The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified
MATRIX MATRIX
ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results
Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )
i Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R
^
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov
PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results
R R
J UJ
J A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No
If no
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present
ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS
AL CA FE KG
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below
SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF
(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VI KATRIX 8PIKZ
TR I MATRIX
1 Recovery Criteria
List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result
Analyte SSR SR IR Action
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a
factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
Frequency Criteria
A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No
B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No
A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES
MATRIX Element CRDL
water soil Sattmlg EEC
Aluminua raquo9kg
AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide
ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of
ACTIONS
Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils
If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VIII FIELD DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight
bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Element CEPi
water soil
AluminumugL
200 raquogkg
AntimonyArsenic
60~ 10
Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets
IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE
1 Aqueous LCS
List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ
2 Solid LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
ACTIONS Percent Recovery
AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t
Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows
Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required
_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _
ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf
1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI
Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
- - -- -
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis
Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX_
ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION
AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -
-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium
-Zinc bull-shy
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION X Data Review Worksheets
X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8
1 Instrument Detection Limits
Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No
IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_
criteria was not met for the _______
2 Reporting Requirements
were sample results on Fora I reported down to
Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe
If No
The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
REGION Z Data Review Worksheets
XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON
cslculation
ZURNACE
MERCURY
CYANIDE
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration
digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml
lOOOug kg arc
the
raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
FJGURE 9 Rtfion
INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO Mllife
LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX
SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o
SOW REVIEWERS NAME U
DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t
PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY
ICP A A H| CYANIDE
1 HOLDING TIMES O
2 CALIBRATIONS
3 BLANKS
ltbull O 5 LCS O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
7 MATRIX SPIKE O
I MSA Q
9 SERIAL DILUTION
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION
II OTHER QC
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X
O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE