Energy Integration ProgramHigh Ratchet Demand Charges Power Distribution, Switching are NOT...

Tampa Convention Center • Tampa, Florida

Energy Integration Program Submarine Base New London, CT

Utility Partnerships Helping the Agency Meet Strategic Goals

Craig S. Prather, PE, CEM, PMP, MBANaval Facilities Engineering Command

August 16, 2017

Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve2

Naval Submarine Base New London, CT

Submarine Capital of the World

Mission: Provide the facilities, deliver the services and create the environment for the Fleet, Fighter and Family to: deploy combat-ready submarines and their crews; and, train a corps of professional submariners.


SUBASE NLON Orientation

Land and facilities Plant Replacement Value - $1.6B 240 facilities 9 barracks 530 acres off-base 687 acres on-base 1,897 PPV Housing Units

Electrical Energy Data Ave Load – 12MW Peak Load – 20MW High Ratcheted Demand Charges

Operational Waterfront 15 SSNs (Homeported) 2 Sub Squadrons / NSSC Regional Support Group Naval Submarine Support Facility

Submarine “University”

Personnel 70 tenants 6,000+ active /reserve military 12,000 family members 12,000 retirees 1,300 Civilian employees 1,000 Contractors 15,000 other Service personnel/ year

Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve

Key Organizations: Concerned, but Unaligned and Inconsistent Approach

Desired Future State: Provide Resilient, Reliable , Efficient and Secure power system Ensure Continuity of Power for most Critical Assets Achieve Cybersecurity IAW Risk Management Framework (RMF) Enhance Partnership – Create Team “Wins” Future capability to provide emergency power to off-base critical loads

SUBASE NLON Energy Situation Problems Statement:

Nuclear Submarines require resilient shore power for them to enter maintenance and crew training. Any loss of power causes emergency remobilization of crew and impacts planned maintenance

Current Situation: Vulnerable to Commercial Grid

Interruptions Unable to Isolate Critical Loads Onsite DERs is Under Capacity High Ratchet Demand Charges

Power Distribution, Switching are NOT Automated. Hours to manually reset

Energy Inefficient Systems & Facilities No Centralized Control for Demand Resp Steam Not Optimized

4


Our Program Partners

Leadership

Environmental


Enhanced Use Lease (10 USC 2667) In Kind Consideration State Bonds and Grants State RECs and Potential Future Tax Benefits Direct and Indirect Contracting 3rd Party Financing Energy Policies Informal Partnering Risk Management

6

Defined Effective Tools

3 Pillars of Energy Security


Grid Power* 5MW CHP* 8MW Fuel Cell #MW DER - TBD 8MW+ Other DER

Energy Integration Plan Drives 3 Primary Capabilities

7

ESPC UESC RMe eMMRP ECIP Smart Grid

Microgrid 1A Critical Loads

Microgrid 1B Priority Loads

Security


Projects Maximizing Program BenefitsGeneration Reliability

Grid Power - Existing 5MW CHP Gas Turbine – Existing 8MW Fuel Cells (EUL/ PPA)

Load Leveler High Efficiency Recoverable Waste Heat Capable Molten Carbonate

#MW DER (ESPC) - TBD Demand Reduction Peak Load Shaving

8MW+ Other DER - TBD

Microgrid 1A: Critical Loads Existing Onsite Generation Upgrade Substations and

Switching Station Automated Controls Fast Load Shedding Island Mode Capable

Microgrid 1B: Priority Loads EUL Site Generation Priority Loads Automated Controls Fiber and Wireless Island Mode Capable

Cybersecurity

Microgrid Resiliency


Energy Efficiency

ESPC Systems and Equipment Upgrades Fiber Infrastructure

UESC ECMs for 50K MBTU & 12% EUI Covers 65% of Covered Facilities

RMe Retro-Commissioning Bldg Upgrades

eMMRP SCADA, NUMCS

ECIP (TBD) Fiber to connect Smart Grid Bldgs

Smart Grid Analytics

Integration Actions

Implement Shared Vision and Ensure Alignment

Timely and Effective Decision Making through an Integration Structure

Manage Risk through Iterative and Dynamic Program Planning

Adhere to a Comprehensive Program POAM

Drive Synchronized Communications

Projects Maximizing Program Benefits


Technical Systems and Design Integration Device Coordination Existing Systems Synchronization Power Quality Technology Changes Project Designs Interconnect Full Functional Testing Commissioning

CONOPs Operations Ownership Operations and Maintenance

10

Integration Considerations - In Progress

Site Conditions Environmental Explosive Safety Approval

Resources Funding and Coordination Operator Training Sustainment Contracting

Cybersecurity FiberWireless


Energy Integration Program Investments

11

Generation Reliability $60M+

Fuel Cell PPA (State REC) ESPC Grid Power CHP Solar PV

Microgrid Resiliency $7M+

Connecticut Bond (Gift) Connecticut DEEP Grant CMEEC IKC Navy OMN

Energy Efficiency $50M+

ESPC UESC Energy RECAP (OMN/NWCF) Smart Grid ECIP^

Energy Integration

12+ Organizations Engineers/ Cyber Planners/ Real Estate Lawyers Financiers


Expected Outcomes

Tier 1a MicrogridTier 1b MicrogridUESC SitesESPC and RMe Locations - TBD

EUL SITE – 8 MW FUEL CELLS

5 MW GAS TURBINE

Other DER - TBD

UESC – Now Groundbreaking – Sep 17 Fuel Cell FOC – Nov 18 Microgrid – Jul 18 ESPC/ Smart Grid – Late FY19


Reliable Power Source to meet customer needs should human or natural disaster interrupt transmission/ distribution

Resilient, Automated and Secured Microgrid to isolate critical and priority loads Maximize Energy Efficiency Enhance the overall Military Value of SUBASE NLON Leveraged and Synergized Financial resources Complement the balance of the Utility provider future distribution based

Microgrid to be interconnected strategically in the near future in layers. Utility Provider remains “Provider of Choice” in helping achieve goals/ objectives SUBASE NLON and surrounding support systems remain viable and key

components of region and state economy Potential reduction of power supply cost, reducing electric cost to customers Potential use of waste heat for additional benefit Fuel cell is produced in CT, further benefiting the CT economy and businesses Enhance Partnership Allow for future capability to provide emergency power to local town, if needed

13

Program Key “Wins”


• Integration Approach - Navigated Challenges• Create “Win-Win-Win” Solutions• Think out of the box, but find way to bring

back into the “contractual” box• Partnering – Formal or Informal• Successful Program still “In the Makings”

14

Program Key Take Aways


Craig S. Prather, PE, CEM, PMP, MBANAVFAC HQ Public Works Business LineUtility and Energy Management Product Line Senior General Engineer – Program Team [email protected]: (202) 304-5997

15

Contact Information

mailto:[email protected]

Energy Integration ProgramHigh Ratchet Demand Charges Power Distribution, Switching are NOT...

Documents

Transcript of Energy Integration ProgramHigh Ratchet Demand Charges Power Distribution, Switching are NOT...