Energy Efficiency Partnership Energy Efficiency Partnership Monitoring Based CommissioningMonitoring Based Commissioning

•• $6.2 Billion Enterprise$6.2 Billion Enterprise

•• $1.5 Billion in Construction$1.5 Billion in Construction

•• $100 Million on Utilities$100 Million on Utilities

About CSUAbout CSU

About CSUAbout CSU •• 60 Million GSF60 Million GSF

•• 23 Million GSF 30 years old23 Million GSF 30 years old

•• $1.60/GSF Utility Cost$1.60/GSF Utility Cost

CSU Energy & Sustainability Policy

Energy Efficiency – 15 % BTU/GSF 2010Energy Independence – 50 MW 2014Renewable Energy Procurement – 20 % 2010Sustainable Building Practices

Performance Against Goal

50,000

55,000

60,000

65,000

70,000

75,000

80,000

85,000

90,000

95,000

100,000

1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/050%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

BTU/GSF % Energy Intensity Complex Space

2003/04 Baseline for New Goal

2000/01-2004/05 Goal

2009/10 New Goal

1999/00 Baseline

Increase in CSU Supplied Computers

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

1999/0

0

2000/0

1

2001/0

2

2002/0

3

2003/0

4

BaseYear

17% renewable (primarily wind)Policy 20% renewable by 2010

Renewable Energy Procurement

Energy Efficiency Delivery

Energy Services Master AgreementUC/CSU/IOU Energy Partnership

MBCx Retrofit ProjectsTrainingGreen Campus Programs

Commissioning MEAMechanical Review Board (MRB)

CESMEAStreamlines project delivery

Uses ‘Competitive Means’ CCC 10709

Leverages the intellectual capital of energy firms

Establishes partnership between the campus and selected firm

CESMEAAllows the use of multiple funding sources

Reduces deferred maintenance backlog

Creates avoided cost in support budget

CESMEA Process

Equipment LeaseFinancing CSU F&T

PerformanceBased

Modified DesignBuild Agreement

Equipment LeaseFinancing CSU F&T

PerformanceBased

Modified DesignBuild Agreement

Select One FirmPartner

DevelopsScope & Cost

Select One FirmPartner

DevelopsScope & Cost

Select2 - 3

QualifiedFirms

Select2 - 3

QualifiedFirms

PreliminaryAssessmentPreliminaryAssessment

InvestmentGrade Assessment

InvestmentGrade Assessment

Finance&

Construction

Finance&

Construction

Campus Participation Agreement

Rider A– Scope of Services & Payment Schedule– Negotiated Rates– Established Terms and Conditions– Defines Deliverables

Getting StartedCampus team– Plant, D&C, Procurement,

Administration, Counsel, Academic, Outside consultant(s) & CSUCO

– Outline goals & objectives– Write PA scope of work

MRB ROLECampus Required

– ReviewTechnology ApplicationsEngineering Calculations

– Provide Written Comments

Campus Optional– Assistance with Scope– Preliminary Engineering

California State University Master Enabling Agreement

Comprehensive Energy Services Program

$11 Million

The project measures

Central Chiller Plant Expansion and Optimization New Thermal Energy Storage TankDirect Digital Control UpgradesHigh Efficiency Lighting RetrofitsPersonal Computer Energy Management SystemWater Conservation MeasuresWell Activation for Irrigation Water

2400 tons chillers new cooling tower, and additional TES tank

Lighting retrofit.

Conservation fixture retrofit

New campus well

Project Sustainability Elements

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

AD AH BK CH EE FB FO HC IC PA PL PW SH SV UA UP VA

Existing KW Proposed KW

Example of Electrical Load Reduction – Lighting (413 kW)

Example of Electrical Load Reduction – Computers 52%

Project Benefits

Lower energy costsEliminates utility plant for CEIncreases plant capacity by 1,100$1.2 Million incentives

Project Benefits

Reduction in greenhouse gas emissionsReduce maintenanceImproved utility infrastructure