Encoding Tool for DQC

8/2/2019 Encoding Tool for DQC

1/42

Consolidated Results of the Data Quality Check Activities for FHSIS FP CU,

4ANC/4PNV, SBA, FBD, FIC, EBF, and GP Vitamin A Supplementation

LGU of

FP CU as of Most common reasons for differences, if any:

Total CU before DQC 1.

Total CU after DQC 2.

3.

CPR before DQC

CPR after DQC

Forecasted requirement for FP Commodities before DQC

For All CU

For Poor CU

Forecasted requirement for FP Commodities after DQC

For All CU

For Poor CU

4ANC as of Most common reasons for differences, if any:

before DQC 1.

after DQC 2.

3.

SBA as of Most common reasons for differences, if any:

before DQC 1.after DQC 2.

3.

FBD as of Most common reasons for differences, if any:

before DQC 1.

after DQC 2.

3.

FIC as of Most common reasons for differences, if any:

before DQC 1.

after DQC 2.

3.

EBF as of Most common reasons for differences, if any:

before DQC 1.after DQC 2.

3.

GP Vit A Supplementation as of Most common reasons for differences, if any:

1st GP 6-11 months 12-59 months 1.

before DQC 2.

after DQC 3.

2nd GP 6-11 months 12-59 months

before DQC

after DQC

Remarks:

* specific results per indicator attached as annexes

Certified true and correct:

EBF table in TCL not f illed up

EBF infants reported by date of registration not at 6mos

True masterlist not available

Population used isn't the official 2010 doh/ns

Some reported FIC not found in TCL

Some reported FIC were 1 year old or more

Some reported FIC lacked one or more vaccines

Some reported infants EBF were not found in the TCL

Some reported deliveries not identified in TCL

Deliveries at RHU, BHS, lying-in maternity clinics

classified as 'other' instead of 'hospital'

1-1-2 prenatal visit schedule by trimester not followed

Wrong computation of trimester dates

Some reported LBs were not identified in TCLComputational errors in adding male and female LBs

CUs not identified in the TCL

Follow up schedules not recorded

CUs not able to return on scheduled follow up date

Some reported pregnant women not identified in TCL

Full Name

Designation PHN

(remarks: on leave, oic, absent, etc)

Full Name

Designation MHO/CHO

(remarks: on leave, oic, absent, etc)

LA UNION

Were all midwives present? Were all the BHSs/baranggays represented in the data sets?

TBAs were added when SBA was computed

SUDIPEN Province of

Were M1 reports available? STs? MCTs? Q1 reports? Was the baseline data set established?

Were the FHSIS records (TCLs) updated? Were secondary (non-FHSIS) source documents used? LCR data available?


2/42

ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FP CU 1 Accomplish theProvince Date 0 Get updated figM/C LGU

Month Year ARE M1 REPORT

LA UNION

SUDIPEN


3/42

RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FP CU

Province LA UNION Date

M/C LGU SUDIPEN

Family Planning Current Users(CU Beginning of month - CU not in TCL + NA of previous month + OA of present month - Dropouts = Updated CU End of month)

(example: CU Beginning of November - CU not in TCL + NA of October + OA of November - Dropouts of November = CU End of November)

Month Year

New(Previous

Month)

Others(Present Month)

Pills

I U D

Injectables

Condoms

Subtotal

BTL

Vasectomy

NFP (SDM)

NFP (LAM)

Total

Remarks:

Family

PlanningMethod

Current Users

(End of thePrevious Month

as Recorded/

Reported in

Latest ST or M1)

Acceptors Dropouts

(Present Month)

UPDATED

Current Users(Present Month)

Clients

Reported in theM1 but not

identified in the

TCL


4/42

RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FP CUProvince LA UNION Date

M/C LGU SUDIPEN

Q1 Report Used as Source for Baseline DataLatest Q1 figures compared to workshop output in lieu of data from ST or M1, which were unavailable

Month Year

Pills

I U D

Injectables

Condoms

Subtotal

BTL

Vasectomy

NFP (SDM)

NFP (LAM)

Total

Difference % DifferenceUPDATED

Current Users

(Based on TCL

Review

Workshop)

Family

Planning

Method

Current Users

(Reported in the

Most Recent

Q1)


5/42

Forecasting of health sector commodity and service requirements for

ProvinceM/C LGU

2010 2011 2012 2013

MWRA as a

proportion of

population: 12.325% (eligible population to accept the method)

Poverty rate 2006

population

ALLCurrent users Baseline

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Pills - - - - -I U D - - - - -In ectables - - - - -Condoms - - - - -Subtotal - - - - -

BTL - - - - -Vasectom - - - - -NFP (SDM) - - - - -NFP (LAM) - - - - -Total - - - - -

MWRA - - - - -CPR #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DI

POOR

Current users Baseline2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Pills - - - - -I U D - - - - -Injectables - - - - -Condoms - - - - -Subtotal - - - - -

BTL - - - - -Vasectomy - - - - -

NFP (SDM) - - - - -NFP (LAM) - - - - -Total - - - - -MWRA - - - - -CPR #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DI

NON-POOR


Pills - - - - -

I U D - - - - -In ectables - - - - -Condoms - - - - -Subtotal - - - - -

BTL - - - - -Vasectom - - - - -NFP (SDM) - - - - -NFP (LAM) - - - - -

SUDIPEN

Projected

Projected

Projected

LA UNION

Projected population


6/42

NFP (SDM) 60 62 64 66 68NFP (LAM) - - - -

Inflation Rate 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033

Reference year: 2010

Projected population -

Estimated MWRA -

Methods (C1) Current Users (C2) CPR (C3)

Commodity orservice per user

per year (C4)

Estimated number

of commodities orservices required

(C5) Price per unit (C6)

Total va

commodservice

requirem

Pill - #DIV/0! 15 - 25

IUD - #DIV/0! 0.286 - 150

Injectables - #DIV/0! 4 - 115Condom - #DIV/0! 120 - 6.33

Sub-total -

Ligation - #DIV/0! 1 - 3000

Vasectom - #DIV/0! 1 - 3000

NFP (SDM) - #DIV/0! 0.100 - 60NFP (LAM) - #DIV/0!

Total - #DIV/0!

Estimated oor MWRA: -

Methods (C1) Current user CPR Factor CPR

Commodity orservice per userper year

Estimated numberof commodities orservices required Price pe

Pill - 1.030 #DIV/0! 15 -

IUD - 1.049 #DIV/0! 0.286 -

Injectables - 1.036 #DIV/0! 4 -Condom - 0.688 #DIV/0! 120 -

Sub-total -

Ligation - 0.615 #DIV/0! 1 -

Vasectomy - 1.000 #DIV/0! 1 -

NFP (SDM) - 1.333 #DIV/0! 0.100 -NFP (LAM) - 1.000 #DIV/0!

Total - #DIV/0!

Forecasted year: 2011

Projected population -

Poor


7/42


8/42

-

Commodity orservice per userper year

Estimated numberof commodities orservices required Price per unit

Total value of

commodity orservicerequirements

Total Value of FPCommodity

Requirements forNon-Poor CurrentUsers

15 - 25 - - -

0.286 - 150 - - -

4 - 115 - - - 120 - 6.33 - - -

- - -

1 - 3000 - -

1 - 3000 - -

0.100 - 60 - - -

- - -

Total

NonRequ

less d

Total Poor andNon-Poor

Requirements


9/42


10/42


11/42

Summary : Commodity and Service Requirements Net of External Donations (using unco

For both poor and non-poor current users2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number of users

Pill - - - - - - IUD - - - - - -

Injectibles - - - - - -

Condom - - - - - -

Ligation - - - - - -

Vasectomy - - - - - -

NFP (SDM) - - - - - -

NFP (LAM) - - - - - -

Total - - - - - -

Number of

commodities and

services 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Pill (cycles) - - - - - -

IUD - - - - - -

Injectibles - - - - - - Condom - - - - - -



NFP (SDM beads) - - - - - -

Total Value of

commodities and

services 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


IUD - - - - - -


Condom - - - - - -


Vasectomy - - - - - - NFP (SDM) - - - - - -

Total - - - - - -

Total Value of FP

commodities

(only) required for

all current users 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


IUD - - - - - -


Condom - - - - - -

NFP (SDM) - - - - - -

Total - - - - - -

For poor current users only2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number of users

Pill - - - - - -

IUD - - - - - -


Condom - - - - - -



NFP (SDM) - - - - - -

NFP (LAM) - - - - - -

Total - - - - - -

Number of

commodities and

services 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


12/42

Vasectomy - - - - - - NFP (SDM beads) - - - - - -

Value of

commodities and

services for the

poor 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Pill (cycles) - - - - - - IUD - - - - - - Injectibles - - - - - - Condom - - - - - - Ligation - - - - - - Vasectomy - - - - - - NFP (SDM beads) - - - - - - Total - - - - - -

Total Value of FP

commodities

(only) required for

poor current

users 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Pill (cycles) - - - - - - IUD - - - - - - Injectibles - - - - - - Condom - - - - - - NFP (SDM) - - - - - - Total - - - - - -

Assumptions:1. Poverty rate based on 2006 provincial poverty rate (Source: NSCB)2. Assumes poverty rate of MWRA is the same as the rate for the entire population3. Prices change based on assumed fixed annual rate of inflation4. Method mix assumed fixed throughout forecast period5. MWRA is 14.5% of total projected population

6. Base year is 2010.

7. Source of cuurent user data: FHSIS


13/42

ata)

Total

-

-

-

--

-

-

Total Financing option

- User charges/private sector




- PhilHealth/NGO

- PhilHealth/RHU

- User charges

-






- User charges

-

Total

---


14/42

--

Total Financing option- LGU budtet- LGU budget/donation- LGU budget- LGU budget- PhilHealth/NGO- PhilHealth/RHU- User charges-

Total Financing option- User charges/private sector- User charges/private sector- User charges/private sector- User charges/private sector- User charges-


15/42


16/42


17/42

Forecasting of health sector commodity and service requirements for

ProvinceM/C LGU

2010 2011 2012 2013- - - -

MWRA as a

proportion of

population: 12.325% (eligible population to accept the method)

Poverty rate 2006

population 0.00%

ALLCurrent users Baseline

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Pills #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VAL

I U D #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALIn ectables #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALCondoms #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALSubtotal - #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VAL

BTL #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALVasectom #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALNFP (SDM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALNFP (LAM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALTotal - #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALMWRA - - - - -CPR #DIV/0! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VAL

POORCurrent users Baseline

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Pills #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALI U D #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALInjectables #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALCondoms #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALSubtotal #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VAL

BTL #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALVasectomy #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALNFP (SDM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALNFP (LAM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALTotal #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALMWRA - - - - -CPR #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VAL

NON-POOR


Pills #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VAL

I U D #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALInjectables #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALCondoms #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALSubtotal #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VAL

BTL #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VAL

Vasectomy #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALNFP (SDM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALNFP (LAM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALTotal #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VAL

Projected population

Projected

Projected

LA UNIONSUDIPEN

Projected


18/42

NFP (LAM) 0 - - - -Inflation Rate 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033

Reference year: 2010

Projected population -Estimated MWRA -

Methods (C1) Current Users (C2) CPR (C3)

Commodity or

service per user

per year (C4)

Estimated numberof commodities or

services required

(C5) Price per unit (C6)

Total vacommod

service

requirem

Pill #VALUE! 15 #VALUE! 25 #VIUD #VALUE! 0.286 #VALUE! 150 #V

Injectables #VALUE! 4 #VALUE! 115 #V

Condom #VALUE! 120 #VALUE! 6.33 #VSub-total - #V

Ligation #VALUE! 1 #VALUE! 3000 #V

Vasectom #VALUE! 1 #VALUE! 3000 #VNFP (SDM) #VALUE! 0.100 #VALUE! 60 #V

NFP (LAM) #VALUE!Total #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Estimated poor MWRA: -

Methods (C1) Current user CPR Factor CPR

Commodity or

service per userper year

Estimated number

of commodities orservices required Price pe

Pill #VALUE! 1.030 #VALUE! 15 #VALUE!

IUD #VALUE! 1.049 #VALUE! 0.286 #VALUE!Injectables #VALUE! 1.036 #VALUE! 4 #VALUE!

Condom #VALUE! 0.688 #VALUE! 120 #VALUE!Sub-total #VALUE!

Ligation #VALUE! 0.615 #VALUE! 1 #VALUE!Vasectomy #VALUE! 1.000 #VALUE! 1 #VALUE!

NFP (SDM) #VALUE! 1.333 #VALUE! 0.100 #VALUE!

NFP (LAM) #VALUE! 1.000 #VALUE!

Total #VALUE! #VALUE!

Forecasted year: 2011

Pro ected o ulation -

Poor


19/42


20/42

-

Commodity or

service per userper year

Estimated number

of commodities orservices required Price per unit

Total value ofcommodity or

servicerequirements

Total Value of FP

CommodityRequirements for

Non-Poor CurrentUsers

15 #VALUE! 25 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

0.286 #VALUE! 150 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V4 #VALUE! 115 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

120 #VALUE! 6.33 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V#VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

1 #VALUE! 3000 #VALUE! #VALUE! #V1 #VALUE! 3000 #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

0.100 #VALUE! 60 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

#VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Total

Non

Requless d

Total Poor and

Non-PoorRequirements


21/42


22/42


23/42

Summary : Commodity and Service Requirements Net of External Donations (using correc

For both poor and non-poor current users2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number of users

Pill #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

IUD #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Injectibles #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Condom #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Ligation #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Vasectomy #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

NFP (SDM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

NFP (LAM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Total - #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Number of

commodities and

services 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Pill (cycles) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

IUD #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Injectibles #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VCondom #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Ligation #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Vasectomy #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

NFP (SDM beads) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Total Value of

commodities and

services 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015



Injectibles #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Condom #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V



NFP (SDM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VTotal #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Total Value of FP

commodities

(only) required for

all current users 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015





NFP (SDM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Total #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

For poor current users only2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number of users

Pill #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V






NFP (SDM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

NFP (LAM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Total #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #V

Number of

commodities and

services 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015



24/42

Vasectomy #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!NFP (SDM beads) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

Value of

commodities and

services for the

poor 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Pill (cycles) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!IUD #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!Injectibles #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!Condom #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!Ligation #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!Vasectomy #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!NFP (SDM beads) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!Total #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

Total Value of FP

commodities

(only) required for

poor current

users 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Pill (cycles) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!IUD #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!Injectibles #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!Condom #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!NFP (SDM) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!Total #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

Assumptions:1. Poverty rate based on 2006 provincial poverty rate (Source: NSCB)2. Assumes poverty rate of MWRA is the same as the rate for the entire population3. Prices change based on assumed fixed annual rate of inflation4. Method mix assumed fixed throughout forecast period5. MWRA is 14.5% of total projected population

6. Base year is 2010.

7. Source of cuurent user data: FHSIS


25/42

a)

Total

#VALUE!

#VALUE!

#VALUE!

#VALUE!

#VALUE!#VALUE!

#VALUE!


#VALUE! User charges/private sector




#VALUE! PhilHealth/NGO

#VALUE! PhilHealth/RHU

#VALUE! User charges

#VALUE!






#VALUE! User charges

#VALUE!

Total

#VALUE!#VALUE!#VALUE!#VALUE!#VALUE!


26/42

#VALUE!#VALUE!

Total Financing option#VALUE! LGU budtet#VALUE! LGU budget/donation#VALUE! LGU budget#VALUE! LGU budget#VALUE! PhilHealth/NGO#VALUE! PhilHealth/RHU#VALUE! User charges#VALUE!

Total Financing option#VALUE! User charges/private sector#VALUE! User charges/private sector#VALUE! User charges/private sector#VALUE! User charges/private sector#VALUE! User charges#VALUE!


27/42


28/42


29/42

ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR 4ANC/4PNV Do not enter figures in cells with a black backgroundProvince 1 Date Encode Q1 reported (R) figures in the cells for the lasM/C LGU 0 Encode updated (U) figures in the appropriate cells,

ARE M1 REPORTS OR ST RECORDS AVAILABLE FOR ALL MIDWIVES?

LA UNION

SUDIPEN


30/42

RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR 4ANC/4PNV Total Population (Please attach population data uProvince Year of Population Data UsedM/C LGU 0 Demographic Factor/Multiplier

Eligible Population

2010 Pregnant Women with 4 or More Prenatal Visits(1 each during the 1st and 2nd trimesters, 2 during the 3rd trimester) *M1s/STs not available, Q1s used as the sources

between quarterly totals can be made.

JAN FEB MAR 1st Q APR MAY JUNE 2nd Q JULY AUG SEPT 3rd Q ONumber

Reported in

M1: MaternalCare 55 55 57 57

Updated

Number Based

on Reviewed

Target Client

List

20 18 18 56 14 18 19 51

Difference

#VALUE! #VALUE! 37 -1 #VALUE! #VALUE! 38 6

% Difference

#VALUE! #VALUE! 67.27% -1.82% #VALUE! #VALUE! 66.67% 10.53%

% 4ANC/4PNV

as Reported

% 4ANC/4PNV

Based on

Updated Data

Difference

Between

Reported and

Updated %

4ANC/4PNV

% Difference

Between

Reported andUpdated %

4ANC/4PNV

Remarks:

SUDIPEN

LA UNION Date


31/42

ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR SBA Do not enter figures in cells with a black background.Province 0 Date Encode Q1 reported (R) figures in the cells for the last months of tM/C LGU Encode updated (U) figures in the appropriate cells, as usual.

LA UNION

SUDIPEN


32/42

RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR SBA

Province 0 Date Total Number of Livebirths as per LCR

M/C LGU LCR Data as of (Date)

(Please attach LCR Data)

2010 Births Attended by Skilled Health Personnel

(Total number of births attended by skilled health personnel, i.e. Doctors, Nurses, Midwives, divided by Total Num

This definition excludes traditional birth attendants, whether trained or not, from the category of skil led health workers

R*

U*

R*

U*

R*

U*

R*

U*

R*

U*

R*

U*

R*

U*

R* - As recorded in the Field Health Service Information System (FHSIS) Target Client List (TCL) and/or Summary Table (ST) and reported in the MonthU* - U dated fi ures after data ualit check

Remarks:

15

1st Q54

14 16

7

0

0

0

00

0

0

0

0

3 6

16

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

16

16

18

54

45

37

0

10

0

8

0

300

0

17

4

0

17

0

22

0

0

15

0

0

0

8

0

0

300

0

0

20

0

0

0

42

0

0

22

49

58

52

JULY AUG SEPT

LA UNION

SUDIPEN

JAN FEB MAR APR 2nd QMAY

37

1110

JUNE

52

23

49

Attended by:

Unknown

Attended by:

Nurses

Attended by:

Midwives

Attended by:

Trained Hilot

/ TBA

Attended by:

Others

Livebirths

(Total)

Attended by:

Doctors298

98.15% 151.02%

% SBA as Recorded

% SBA based on

Updated Data

Difference Between

Recorded and

Updated % SBA

-1.85% 44.12%

100.00% 106.90%

% Difference

Between Recordedand Updated % SBA

-1.89% 29.22%


33/42

ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FBD Do not enter figures in cells with a black background.Province 0 Date Encode Q1 reported (R) figures in the cells for the last months of tM/C LGU Encode updated (U) figures in the appropriate cells, as usual.

LA UNION

SUDIPEN


34/42

RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FBD

Province 0 Date Total Number of Deliveries as per LCR

M/C LGU LCR Data as of (Date)

(Please attach LCR Data)

2010 Deliveries by Type and Place

(Number of Normal Deliveries at home/hospital/others, Number of Other Types of Deliveries at home/hospital/othe

FBD = (Normal Deliveries at Hospital (includes RHU, BHS, lying-in) + Other Types of Deliveries at Hospital) divided

R*

U*

R*

U*

R*

U*

R*

U*

R*

U*

R*

U*

R*

U*

R* - As recorded in the Field Health Service Information System (FHSIS) Target Client List (TCL) and/or Summary Table (ST) and reported in the MonthlU* - U dated fi ures after data ualit check

Remarks:

0

59.26% 70.83%

16

LA UNION

SUDIPEN

% FBD as Recorded

0

19 10

0

0

Difference Between

Recorded and

Updated % FBD

% FBD based on

Updated Data

6.88% 5.26%

52.38% 65.57%

4

0

0 0

0

0

12

3

0 0

2 0

11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

0

10

9

3

Normal

Delivery:

Hospital

Total Number

of Deliveries

Normal

Delivery:

Others

Other Type

Delivery:

Home

Other Type

Delivery:

Hospital

Other Type

Delivery:Others

Normal

Delivery:Home 8

APR MAY JUNE 2nd Q

% Difference

Between Recordedand Updated % FBD

11.61%

JULY AUG SEPT

7.43%

JAN FEB MAR 1st Q

1

0

22

7

29

5

0

3

1

0

0

54

13

22

20

29

20

0

0

0

0

0

0

54

42

0

19

21

9

51

17

0

0

0

72

26

21

21

51

40

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

72

61


35/42

ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FIC Do not enter figures in cells with a black background.Province 0 Date Encode Q1 reported (R) figures in the cells for the last months of M/C LGU Encode updated (U) figures in the appropriate cells, as usual.

LA UNION

SUDIPEN


36/42

RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FIC Total Population (Province 0 Date Year of PopulationM/C LGU Demographic Fac

Eligible Population

2010 Fully Immunized Child (0-11 mos)

An infant who received 1 dose of BCG, 3 doses each of OPV, DPT, Hepatitis B vaccine and 1 dose of anti-Measles v

(Number of Fully Immunized Children divided by Total population x 2.7%)

Number

Reported in

M1: Child Care

Updated

Number Based

on TCL/ST

Difference

% Difference

% FIC as

Previously

Reported

Updated % FIC

Difference

Between

Reported and

Updated % FIC

% Difference

Between

Reported and

Updated % FIC

1st Q 2nd Q 3rd

0%

0

63

#VALUE! #VALUE!

#VALUE!#VALUE!40

#VALUE! #VALUE!

#VALUE!

22

61

66% 13%

8

53

SUDIPEN

61

SEPT

63

JUNE

24

44%

63

35

28#VALUE!

LA UNION

JULY AUGMAYFEBJAN MAR APR

10 21 4


37/42

ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR EBF Do not enter figures in cells with a blackProvince 0 Date Encode Q1 reported (R) figures in the ceM/C LGU Encode updated (U) figures in the appro

Total

CASTRO

SENGNGAT

DUPLAS

BULALAAN

MALICLICO

PORPORIKET

UPUPLAS

SFSUR

BIGBIGA

SFNORTE

SAN

JOSE

OLD

CENTRAL

ILOCANO

NAMALTUGAN

PONLACION

IPET

TUROD

BHS

orBrgy

BHS

orBrgy

BHS

orBrgy

BHS

orBrgy

LA UNION

SUDIPEN


38/42

RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR EBF

Province 0 Date

M/C LGU

2010 Infants Exclusively Breastfed Until 6th Mo

Total Number of of Infants Exclusivel Breastfed Until 6th Month divided b Total Number of Infants 6 M

Infants Exclusively

Breastfed Until 6thMonth Reported in

M1: Child Care

Updated Number

Based on TCL/ST

Difference

% Difference

Infants Age 6 Months

Seen Reported in M1:

Child Care

Updated Number

Based on TCL/ST

Difference

% Difference

% EBF as Previously

Reported

Updated % EBF

Difference Between

Reported and

Updated % EBF

% Difference Between

Reported and

Updated % EBF

Remarks:

1st Q 2nd Q JULY AUG MAYJAN FEB JUNE SEPTMAR APR

LA UNION

SUDIPEN


39/42

ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR VITAMIN A SUPPLEMENTATION

Province 1 Date

M/C LGU 0

Total

BHSorBrgy

BHSorBrgy

BHSorBrgy

BHSorBrgy

BHSorBrgy

BHSorBrgy

BHSorBrgy

BHSorBrgy

BHSorBrgy

aster st 6-11

No12-5 Yes

No6-11 Yes

No- Yes

No - *

U*12-5 R*

* 6-11 *

U*

12-5 R**

LA UNION

SUDIPEN


40/42

RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR VITAMIN A SUPPLEMENTATIONProvince Date

M/C LGU

2010 Infant/Children Given Vitamin A (6-11 months and 12-59 months)

(Infants/Children given Vitamin A divided by Number of Infants/Children 6-11 and 12-59 months)1 0

R*

U*

R*

Remarks:

U*

R* - As recorded and reported in the Garantisadong Pambata (GP) activity documentationU* - Updated figures after data quality check

2nd GP Conducted in 2010 -

usually OctoberTotal Population

(Please attach

population data used)

% Difference between

recorded/reported

data and updated

LA UNION

SUDIPEN

Total Number of Infants/Children 6-11 and 12-59 months old

Is there a masterlist (RHU/CHO level) of infants 6-11 months old?

Is there a masterlist (RHU/CHO level) of children 12-59 months old?

Difference between

recorded/reported

data and updated

Children 12-59

months given Vit A

% Difference between

recorded/reported

data and updated

Difference between

recorded/reporteddata and updated

Infants 6-11 months

given Vit A

1st GP Conducted in 2010 -

usually April

6-11 Months

Used for the 1st GP

Activity in 2010

Yes No

Used for the 2nd

Activity in 2010

Yes

(Year)

12-59

Months

Demographic

Factor/Multiplier

Eligible Population

Demographic

Factor/Multiplier

Eligible Population


41/42

Com atibility Re ort for Encoding Tool for DQC.xls

Run on 1/7/2012 10:49

The following features in this workbook are not supported by earlier versions of

Excel. These features may be lost or degraded when opening this workbook in

an earlier version of Excel or if you save this workbook in an earlier file format.

Significant loss of functionality # of occurrences

One or more cells in this workbook contain data validation rules which refer to

values on other worksheets. These data validation rules will not be saved.

7

E - FP CU'!Q5

E - Vit

A'!E10:CZ10

E - Vit

A'!E12:CZ12

E - Vit A'!E8:CZ8

E - Vit A'!E6:CZ6

C - Vit A'!O10:Q11

C - Vit A'!U10:W11


42/42

Version

Excel 97-2003

Excel 97-2003

Excel 97-2003

Encoding Tool for DQC

Documents

Transcript of Encoding Tool for DQC