Enclosure (1)

i Enclosure (1)

The 2016 NAVSEA NDT Working Group hosted by Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and

Intermediate Maintenance Facility

ii Enclosure (1)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I. NDT WORKING GROUP CHARTER

1

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4

III. PRESENTATIONS

5

IV. BREAKOUT SESSIONS

12

V. PREVIOUS WORKING GROUP

ACTION ITEMS

24

VI. WORKING GROUP MEETING

ATTENDEES

42

1 Enclosure (1)

I. NDT WORKING GROUP CHARTER

1. Foreword. Nondestructive Testing (NDT) is an integral part of quality control and quality assurance in procurement, construction, overhaul, and maintenance of ships of the United States Navy. The Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) recognizes the value of an NDT Working Group dedicated to improving NDT processes as they apply to Naval ships’ systems and components, and it is considered an essential part of the NAVSEA initiative to improve cost, schedule, quality, and technical excellence.

2. Vision. The NDT Working Group will be the catalyst and instrument for improving

or recommending improvements to NDT processes specified in NAVSEA Technical

Publications, Standards or Specifications associated with NDT.

3. Purpose

The group will address and resolve, or recommend resolution to the proper technical authority, those NDT issues associated with building, maintaining and operating Naval ships.

The group will work as a team to share ideas, information, successes, best practices, and failures.

The group will strive to make improvements through effective integration of all stakeholders.

The group will receive guidance, approval, support, and/or limitations from NAVSEA 04X6.

The group will determine applicable action items from inputs received from stakeholders and/or NAVSEA 04X6.

The group will address improvement of NDT processes from an industry-wide perspective thereby soliciting participation by all stakeholders.

4. Membership

NDT Working Group Chairperson and Linking Pin to NAVSEA 04X6

NDT & Welding Programs Manager (SEA 04X6NDT) Naval Sea Systems Command

Quality Programs and Certification Office

NAVSEA NDT Technical Representative NDT & E Technical Warrant Holder (SEA 05P2) Naval Sea Systems Command Materials Engineering Group

NDT Working Group Host Rotational among stakeholders

2 Enclosure (1)

Members/Stakeholders

Naval Sea Systems Command

Naval Shipyards

Regional Maintenance Centers

Supervisors of Shipbuilding

Contractors who apply NAVSEA-specified NDT

Type Commanders/Fleet Activities

Defense Contract Management Agency 5. Coordination

NDT Working Group members, through cooperation and support of their respective activities, are responsible for maintaining working group continuity.

The Chairperson is responsible for identification, execution and tracking status of current action items to ensure their timely completion through communications with Action Item teams.

The NDT Working Group will strive to arrive at decisions by consensus of its members.

The NDT Working Group will convene annually.

This charter may be modified by NAVSEA 04X6.

6. Objectives

Identify and implement, or recommend to proper authority the implementation of improvements in NDT processes.

Improve quality and reduce costs of NDT.

Remove institutional barriers that obstruct the sharing of information and knowledge.

Promote NDT education and training.

Improve communication.

Strive for customer satisfaction.

Increase NDT process standardization for the benefit of all stakeholders.

7. Focus

NDT Qualification process (i.e., formal classroom training, work-time-experience and examination [written & practical exams]) to obtain certification.

3 Enclosure (1)

NDT Performance Monitoring/Surveillance and Technical Performance Evaluations.

State-of-the-art NDT Processes and Equipment.

Standardization of NDT processes.

Lessons Learned.

NDT Technical Issues.

Action Items as assigned by NAVSEA 04X6.

8. Timetable

This charter will be updated as necessary during each NDT Working Group.

The Working Group Link Pin will update NDT Working Group action items at each session of the QA Directors Meeting.

Membership will determine agenda items.

All action items will be subject to milestones/completion as designated by the NDT Working Group.

The NDT Working Group will be disbanded upon consensus of the Working Group or NAVSEA 04X6.

Chairperson will determine location and date of the next NDT Working Group and announce during the last day of the Working Group.

4 Enclosure (1)

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS&IMF) hosted the 14th NAVSEA NDT Working Group meeting during the period 19 – 21 July 2016 at the Olympic Lodge on Naval Base Kitsap in Bremerton, Washington. Mr. Rick Sheridan (PSNS & IMF Welding Engineering and NDT Examiner Division Head) and Mr. Wayne Rolland (PSNS & IMF NDT Division Head) co-hosted the meeting, and Mr. Jason Hence (NAVSEA NDT & Welding Programs Manager; SEA 04X6NDT) is the NAVSEA NDT Working Group Chairperson. CAPT Howard Markle (PSNS & IMF Commander) opened the Working Group meeting. He reminded the participants that one of the purposes of this Working Group is to share ideas from all activities. He then asked everyone to get to know each other and

to invest the time to make us better across the NAVSEA NDT community. Mr. Mark Angell (PSNS & IMF Quality Assurance Director) then addressed the meeting, stressing our mission to maintain and modernize the Navy’s fleet. He then briefed the attendees on his Lean Six Sigma background and stressed that we need to ask ourselves how we can improve and impact delivering the product. Mr. Hence welcomed the group and noted that regardless of where each of the meeting’s participants is from or whether they are active duty, DoD civilian, or contractor, we all share the common language of NDT and a common purpose: building and maintaining the Fleet and ensuring that the men and women who serve make it back home safely. Mr. Hence then invited each participant to introduce themselves and what activity they represented. Mr. Paul Colahan (NAVSEA Director of Oversight and Assessment; SEA 04X6) stated that the reason for this Working Group meeting is to rapidly exchange ideas and echoed the new NAVSEA Commander’s guiding principles, stating that our purpose is to deliver ships on time with quality and as affordably as possible. Presentations were given addressing multiple topics including: The Current State of NAVSEA NDT; 2015 NDT Working Group Action Item Updates; NDT Audit Lessons Learned; Active Infrared Thermography; and Pulsed Terahertz Imaging R&D field work. The Working Group addressed numerous subjects during each presentation and in later breakout sessions. Presentation details are described in Section III. The Working Group meeting concluded with the assembly having successfully established a Plan of Actions and Milestones for each of several breakout sessions

including reviewing the draft NAVSEA Technical Publication of Computed Radiography requirements. Naval Surface Warfare Center – Port Hueneme Division in Oxnard, California will host next year’s Working Group meeting. More information will be provided in the coming weeks and months. Copies of presentations may be obtained by contacting the presenter.

5 Enclosure (1)

III. PRESENTATIONS

A. The Current State of NAVSEA NDT – Dr. Kirsten Green (NAVSEA NDT&E Technical Warrant Holder; SEA 05P2) 1. NAVSEA T9074-AS-GIB-010/271, Revision 1: NAVSEA issued the Technical Publication revision in September 2014. Direct any problems encountered after implementation to Dr. Green and Mr. Hence. The NAVSEA 05 goal is to update all NAVSEA Technical Publications every 5 years. 2. MIL-STD-2035 Revision: NAVSEA is currently drafting the document into NAVSEA Technical Publication format. This draft NAVSEA Tech Pub should be ready for Industry Review by mid-August 2016.

3. NAVSEA Technical Publication for NDT of Composites: The composites NDT subject matter expert (SME), Mr. Bruce Bandos at Naval Surface Warfare Center – Carderock Division, drafted this document which is the result of lessons learned over the past several years. This draft NAVSEA Tech Pub is similar to NAVSEA Tech Pub 271, but it codifies the approved NDT requirements for inspecting composites vice inspecting metals. SEA 05P2 released the draft NAVSEA Tech Pub for Industry Review in July 2016 and intends to leave it as a stand-alone document. 4. NSTM Chapter 074, Vol. 2 Revision: Mr. Hence has drafted a revision to the NSTM chapter and is soliciting comments for the document to be completed after NAVSEA issues the MIL-STD-2035 revision. 5. Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT)/Time of Flight Diffraction (ToFD): The approval to use PAUT/ToFD on some Carbon Steel pipe weld applications has been in effect for some time now. In June 2016, NAVSEA issued its approval to use PAUT/ToFD on some Copper-Nickel (CuNi) pipe weld applications. Some of the CuNi provisions include:

No PAUT/ToFD on consumable insert weld joints

Two PAUT/ToFD Examiners must be present, and

Class 2 acceptance for DRL is essentially a modified Class 1

The next PAUT/ToFD Cumbersome Work Practice (CWP) submittal for piping

applications is Carbon Steel piping welds, the configuration of which prevents

PAUT/ToFD inspection from both sides. The savings for inspecting from one side may

be greater than the current inspection from both sides because of the increased

number of weld joints that become available for inspection.

6. Eddy Current Testing (ET): a. A Failure Review Board concluded for two in-service heat exchanger tube leaks. The thinning was not detected during previous inspections. The cause of the leaks has not yet been determined but NAVSEA suspects manufacturing flaws.

6 Enclosure (1)

b. NAVSEA has tasked Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY) to find a way to inspect tube sheet void space areas. c. The goals of the ET breakout session during this meeting include discussing permeability issues encountered during some ET tubing inspections, and lessons learned. d. NAVSEA has received requests to use ET (Crack Detection) in lieu of Magnetic Particle Testing (MT). One concern with this is the unresolved question of whether ET can detect hydrogen embrittlement cracking. One activity found such cracks using MT but not while inspecting the same hardware using ET in accordance with the current NAVSEA Tech Pub 271 ET requirements. The activity found the cracking with ET when they set up for ET on the MT notch vice the ET notch. There is significantly less volume in the MT notch than the ET notch, so this may be a possible solution. 7. Computed Radiography (CR) Requirements: The 2015 NAVSEA NDT Working Group resolved the outstanding issues with the CR requirements which NAVSEA then drafted into NAVSEA Technical Publication format. The draft NAVSEA Tech Pub was released for Industry Review in June 2016. NAVSEA will release this document as a stand-alone NAVSEA Tech Pub initially and then incorporate the requirements into the next NAVSEA Tech Pub 271 revision. 8. Other NDT Issues: NAVSEA 05 is revising MIL-STD-1689 and drafting into NAVSEA Tech Pub format. NAVSEA 05 is also revising NAVSEA Tech Pub 278. B. Previous NAVSEA NDT WG Action Items Update – Mr. Jason Hence (NAVSEA NDT & Welding Programs Manager; SEA 04X6NDT) 1. MIL-STD-2035 Revision: In progress at NAVSEA 05. See Dr. Green’s update in the “Current State of NAVSEA NDT” presentation. 2. Computed Radiography (CR) Requirements: In progress at NAVSEA 05. See Dr. Green’s update in the “Current State of NAVSEA NDT” presentation. The Working Group will review the draft NAVSEA Tech Pub during a breakout session and provide comments back to NAVSEA. 3. NDT Corporate Procedure Alignment: The Naval Shipyards have scrapped the previous Corporate Standardization model in favor of a more focused effort to complete all aspects (i.e., procedures, lesson plans, training tests, and certification examinations) of one NDT method at a time. The new NDT Community of Practice will be the forum for this effort. PSNS & IMF hosted the first NDT CoP meeting the week

prior to the Working Group meeting (12 – 15 July 2016). 4. SUPSHIP NDT Issues: This breakout session last year transformed from the SUPSHIP personnel requesting clarification on various NDT issues to a discussion about how we bridge the experience gap between a newly certified NDT Examiner and a seasoned, competent NDT Examiner. How can we as a community contribute to the development of newly certified Examiners and those individuals wishing to be Examiners? Mr. Hence selected the NDT Examiner development topic to be a breakout session during this meeting.

7 Enclosure (1)

5. Pulsed Terahertz Imaging: The actions from this breakout session last year are business sensitive. 6. 2011 NDT Working Group Action – Use of Quantitative Quality Indicators (QQI) for MT: Dr. Green will evaluate including QQI requirements into the next NAVSEA Tech Pub 271 revision if interest remains at that time. In the meantime, anyone wishing to use QQIs is welcome to submit a request for approval to use QQIs along with supporting technical rationale to SEA 05P2 (Dr. Green). The NDT Working Group will continue to track this action until approval is granted (or denied) or NAVSEA Tech Pub 271 is revised, whichever occurs first. 7. 2011 NDT Working Group Action – Piping Socket Weld Scribe Line: The change requested by the NDT Working Group has not yet been incorporated into NAVSEA Technical Publication 278. Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (SWRMC) re-submitted wording for the NAVSEA Tech Pub 278 revision currently being drafted. The current NAVSEA Tech Pub 278 wording has led to incorrect interpretation that a scribe line to verify weld size is required only for Class P-1 piping socket welds. 8. 2012 NDT Working Group Action – Blue Light for Fluorescent MT: Similar to the use of QQIs above, the use of blue lights for fluorescent MT will be considered for inclusion in the next revision of NAVSEA Tech Pub 271. C. NDT Audit Lessons Learned (2015-2016) – Mr. Jason Hence (NAVSEA NDT & Welding Programs Manager; SEA 04X6NDT) 1. Mr. Hence performs NDT audits of several activities including Naval Shipyards, Nuclear Shipbuilders, Regional Maintenance Centers, Supervisors of Shipbuilding, Trident Refit Facility-Kings Bay (TRF-KB), and Ship Repair Facility-Japan Regional Maintenance Center (SRF-JRMC). 2. This presentation should not be viewed as a tell-all about other activities. No activity is named in this presentation. This should be seen by everyone as an opportunity to take some lessons learned back to their own activity and to fix similar issues if applicable. 3. Program Management findings: a. No reference revisions identified in procedures. Procedures should include the reference revisions so anyone looking at the procedure will easily understand to what set of requirements the procedure was written.

b. Verification of NDT qualification. The NDT Examiner is required to validate an individual’s NDT qualification for certification whether the individual is a new hire with previous certifications at another activity or in the course of normal in-house qualification. ASNT SNT-TC-1A (2011 edition) requires two Examiner signatures in an individual’s NDT certification record. The most obvious is the Examiner signature on the actual certification record (SNT-TC-1A, paragraph 9.4.12). The least obvious and most missed is the signature of the Examiner that verified the candidate’s qualifications for certification (SNT-TC-1A, paragraph 9.4.9). The Examiner is

8 Enclosure (1)

required to sign for verification that (1) a candidate was actually certified previously at another activity; and (2) that an in-house candidate has received initial training, acquired all requisite Work Time Experience, etc., before being allowed to attempt certification. c. Written Weld Workmanship Examinations. Some activities require only a written Weld Workmanship examination to qualify a welder. NAVSEA Tech Pub 248 does not require specific examination types. NAVSEA Tech Pub 248, paragraph 5.2.3.1(c), states that the Weld Workmanship qualification program shall include “Examinations covering detail workmanship and visual inspection requirements to be passed by each person with a grade of no less than 75 percent.” The question is whether an individual’s ability to identify weld discontinuities and the individual’s ability to apply visual acceptance criteria can truly be tested with only a written examination. In contrast, Visual Testing (VT) inspectors are specifically required to undergo both written and practical examinations. This is more than simply a case of asking what the letter of the law states; it is a case of evaluating what the right thing to do is. d. The current NDT Examiner did not approve NDT examinations. Some activities make no changes to and do not re-approve NDT examinations when another Examiner is delegated responsibility for that method, sometimes for many years. ASNT SNT-TC-1A (2011 edition), paragraph 8.7.1.1, requires that all questions used for NDT Level I and Level II examinations be approved by the responsible NDT Examiner. If an Examiner retires or is assigned to be cognizant over another method, that Examiner is no longer the “responsible NDT Examiner”, and the new Examiner must either re-approve the existing examinations or approve newly-developed examinations.

Question: Should a new Examiner also re-approve NDT procedures, including the NDT Written Practice?

Answer: Yes. NDT procedures are less subjective than the Written Practice, so they should be easily re-approved. Re-routing through the activity’s chain of command is not necessary, but the new Examiner should generate OQE (e.g., a memo to file) to record the re-approval. Because the Written Practice describes the Examiner’s process by which they train, qualify, and certify NDT personnel, the new Examiner will likely make changes to the previous Examiner’s process (e.g., increasing or decreasing the number of WTE hours required for qualification in a given method/technique). Of course, if a change to any procedure is made, the procedure must be re-routed through the activity’s

administrative signature process, including the Examiner’s approval signature.

e. No NDT examination question and answer references. Some examples of this finding include questions and answer references of “Common Sense” or “General Knowledge”, or not including references at all. The ASNT SNT-TC-1A (2011 edition) Appendix A note requires all questions and answers to be referenced to a recognized source.

9 Enclosure (1)

f. Vision test record maintenance. NAVSEA Tech Pub 271, Revision 1, paragraph 1.6.8.c states that NDT personnel records shall contain vision test records noting corrective aids, if used, which shall be maintained for the current and preceding certification period. Dr. Green has clarified that the intent of this requirement is to maintain the current and previous vision test record, not to include vision test records for up to the last six years (if an individual is in the final year of his/her second certification period). This should be clarified in the next revision of NAVSEA Tech Pub 271. g. NDT Examiner delegated representative. Another new addition in NAVSEA Tech Pub 271, Revision 1 was the allowance for an NDT Examiner to delegate to their representative certain activities, including the administration and grading of NDT examinations. If an Examiner chooses to do this, the Examiner must document appropriate instruction by the Examiner in the proper administration and grading of examinations prior to the representative conducting and grading examinations for NDT personnel. This requirement is specified in ASNT SNT-TC-1A (2011 edition), paragraph 8.1.1.1. h. Improper technical direction for authorizing a welder qualification. This particular case involved a Contract Administration Quality Assurance Program (CAQAP) NDT activity identifying during required Radiographic Testing (RT) film review that the welder who welded the pipe joint was not qualified. The CAQAP activity correctly issued a Corrective Action Request (CAR) to the contractor. The contractor cited in their CAR response alternative welder qualification process in NAVSEA Tech Pub 248, paragraph 5.2.4(a), and requested Government authorization to qualify the welder after the fact using the satisfactory RT as justification. The CAQAP activity granted the authorization. The NAVSEA finding cited improper technical direction because the same NAVSEA Tech Pub 248 paragraph requires that permission to use this method of establishing welder performance qualification must be obtained prior to starting production welding. 4. NDT Performance findings: a. The normal NDT inspector findings encountered include inspectors missing indications/conditions (e.g., not checking both legs of a fillet weld during VT), inspector’s applying incorrect acceptance criteria (e.g., calculating incorrect PT maximum allowable indication area), and inspectors not achieving 100% inspection area coverage (e.g., not applying the magnetic field in two directions during MT). b. A PT inspector contaminated the inspection surface with tight fitting parts near the inspection area. The inspector decided to re-process the original inspection

and sprayed remover on the surface to clean off the PT materials. The remover bled into the inspection area when the inspector applied developer during the re-PT. c. A PT inspector kept the inspected part submerged for the duration of the penetrant dwell time during a water washable PT inspection using a dip tank. The inspector was unable to detect any possible penetrant separation caused by inspection surface contamination with the part submerged. In addition, the Nondestructive Testing Handbook (Third Edition), Volume 2 (“Liquid Penetrant Testing”), Part 2, page 42, states “Liquid penetrant should wet the entire test surface with a uniform liquid

10 Enclosure (1)

film.” There is no film present if the part is submerged. Additionally, ASTM E1417 (“Standard Practice for Liquid Penetrant Testing”), paragraph 7.2.1 states “It is recommended to rotate or otherwise move components as necessary, during dwell…”, indicating that penetrant mobility is also necessary for PT inspection. d. Two inspectors each placed the handle of their penetrant applicator in their mouth after applying penetrant to an inspection surface. This is an obvious safety concern. e. An RT inspector did not document pitting in the adjacent base material during RT Film Interpretation. The concern with this is that the pitting represents base material loss which could violate the minimum allowed wall thickness. MIL-STD-2035A, paragraph 5.2.1.10.a states that any defect revealed by inadvertent radiography shall be evaluated to base material criteria, and an engineering evaluation is required if radiography criteria do not exist. In one instance, the inspector had properly noted the pitting and requested an engineering evaluation but did nothing more. MIL-STD-2035A, paragraph 5.2.1.10 further requires, “Any engineering actions taken in accordance with inadvertently detected defects shall be noted in the radiographic record.” This RT record documentation “closes the loop” on the RT evaluation. 5. Welding findings: a. There was a case of improper welding rod oven use where some sections of the rod oven were marked “Rebake”. NAVSEA fabrication documents require adherence to very controlled parameters when re-baking welding filler material. The activity stated they never rebake welding filler material, so the logical corrective action was to remove the “Rebake” labels to mitigate the risk associated with welders thinking the filler metal had undergone the rebake process. b. Another welding rod oven was found to have food (i.e., a burrito) warming inside it. D. Questionmark Examination Generator – Mr. Nate Livesey, Norfolk Naval Shipyard 1. Questionmark is NMCI-approved software that allows for aggregating training tests, certification examinations, exam data analysis, and feedback into training and lessons-learned. 2. Some attributes of the Questionmark software are:

a. Exams can be administered on a computer or tablet. b. Exams can be browser based or client based. c. Exams are graded instantly. d. Exams can be built to specific parameters, the results analyzed (i.e., which questions are missed most often, etc.

11 Enclosure (1)

3. The software security includes passwords assigned for the exams and the browser is locked out during examination so answers cannot be looked up online. 4. There is no limit to the number of simultaneous examinations. 5. Norfolk Naval Shipyard is researching whether the software can communicate and feed other Shipyard applications (i.e., ATMS, QPS, etc.). 6. The exam bank answers and distractors can be rearranged so the list of potential answers for a given question would be different in successive or simultaneous examinations. 7. Access to the software is permissions-based so individuals can access different portions of the software depending on their permissions. E. Emerging NDT Technology: Active vs. Passive Infrared Thermography and Pulsed Terahertz Imaging – Dr. Patric Lockhart, Naval Undersea Warfare Center – Newport 1. Infrared Thermography (IRT) is an imaging technology that allows the user to see an object’s thermal differences which could indicate discontinuities. Active thermography requires the user to induce heat from an external source to the object under inspection and view the resultant thermal images. With passive thermography, the user views thermal differences in an object without inducing heat. IRT is being explored to potentially replace surface NDT inspections (i.e., MT and PT) in some applications. 2. Terahertz (THz) Imaging is a new NDT technology that allows the user to “see” inside or through many solid objects to detect surface defects in a target material. THz Imaging can detect debond, corrosion, voids, water intrusion, mechanical damage, and internal interfaces. Potential Navy applications include structural inspections of underlying material through a coating, three-dimensional relief maps of internal surfaces or coating volumes, measuring debond separation distances, and reduced costs through noninvasive inspections. 3. Both IRT and THz Imaging are in the early research and development stages.

12 Enclosure (1)

IV. BREAKOUT SESSIONS (NOTE: Each Team Leader is responsible

to drive POA&M to completion or transfer lead to another activity.)

A. EDDY CURRENT TESTING (ET) ISSUES 1. Team Leader: Larry Wedel, Newport News Shipbuilding

2. Team Members:

NAME ACTIVITY

Jon Fallick Gryphon LC

Kirsten Green NAVSEA 05P2

Robin Workman NNSY

Robert Jonas NNSY

Traci Jefferson NSWC-Carderock

Derrick Washington NSWC-Carderock

Tim Tenopir NSWC-Port Hueneme

Patric Lockhart NUWC-Newport

Gail Albright PHNSY & IMF

Gregory Powers PSNS & IMF

Nona Brown PSNS & IMF

Travis Hileman PSNS & IMF

Mark Perreault TRF-Kings Bay

3. Purpose/Objective: a. To discuss open items from critique failure review board. b. To discuss recent issues (i.e., permeability, oxide/dissolution) concerning ability to conduct inspections. c. Approval to verify tube marking for plugging. d. Tube sheet void space inspection. e. Clarification that the requirement to save data for 12 years includes preserving ability to review data. f. Re-establish ET annual meeting.

g. Trending of data – evaluation of conditions from past inspections, then worst flaws in tubes. 4. Breakout Synopsis: The group evaluated state of the art / commercial practices for improvements in inspection process. The group also discussed MIZ 28 ET equipment issues relative to calibration requirements and the NAVSEA 04 METCAL letter issued in June 2016.

13 Enclosure (1)

5. Plan of Action & Milestones: a. Evaluate the potential for acquiring legacy ET tubing inspection analysis equipment at NSWC-Carderock.

ASSIGNED TO: Traci Jefferson SCD: 1 September 2016

b. Establish ET Tubing audit in conjunction with NAVSEA 04/07/08 NDT Functional Evaluation of NNSY.

ASSIGNED TO: Larry Wedel SCD: 31 October 2016

c. Ensure NAVSEA 05V has added instructions to use 70/30 CuNi electronic curve for all CVN ET Heat Exchanger inspections.

ASSIGNED TO: Larry Wedel SCD: 31 August 2016

d. Update local ET procedures to ensure positive identification of tubes to be plugged and to reflect tube labeling process to ensure (1) correct tubes are plugged, and (2) evaluation of tube plugging.

ASSIGNED TO: Robin Workman SCD: 1 October 2016

ASSIGNED TO: Gregory Powers SCD: 1 October 2016

ASSIGNED TO: Larry Wedel SCD: 1 October 2016

e. Establish annual ET meeting during the week of the 2017 NDT Working Group.

ASSIGNED TO: Kirsten Green SCD: 31 May 2017

f. Follow up on NAVSEA 04 METCAL letter to ensure it does not apply to ET Tube Inspection equipment.

ASSIGNED TO: Jason Hence SCD: COMPLETE

14 Enclosure (1)

B. PHASED ARRAY UT / TIME OF FLIGHT DIFFRACTION

1. Team Leader: Jacob “Chance” Styron, PSNS & IMF

2. Team Members:

NAME ACTIVITY

Gordy Daviscourt DCMA

Kristian Smestad EB Corp.

Chris Arnold HII-NNS

Ken Donn LCE

Amy Brinkley NNSY

Samuel Palmer NNSY

Derrick Washington NSWC-Carderock

Jeff Timms Oceaneering

Sean Killeen Olympus

Emilie Peloquin Olympus

Derek Johnson PHNSY & IMF

Adam Kubik PNS

Nathan Labonte PNS

Eric Rohrbacher PNS

Ernie Adams PSNS & IMF

Kevin Hasegawa PSNS & IMF

Jason Lasater PSNS & IMF

Pat Roberts PSNS & IMF

Rick Sheridan PSNS & IMF

Todd Kinter SRF-Japan RMC

Jeff Adams SUPSHIP Bath

Pat Shank SUPSHIP Groton

Mark Perreault TRF-Kings Bay

3. Purpose/Objective: a. Purpose: To discuss PAUT/ToFD program developments, including Structural PAUT/ToFD, PAUT training, CuNi PAUT, PAUT inspections from one side, and CWP funds usage. b. Objective: Identify near-term Work Time Experience (WTE) opportunities at the Shipyards to enable organizations to send personnel to receive PAUT and ToFD WTE.

4. Breakout Synopsis: a. Mr. Donn discussed his progress in developing PAUT/ToFD (structural) inspection protocols and the methods at Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF. He discussed Cumbersome Work Practice (CWP) – 397 (Structural PAUT Development), the test methods, setup, types of scans, and transducers used in the testing. Mr. Donn also discussed the benefits of PAUT compared to conventional UT.

15 Enclosure (1)

b. Mr. Rick Sheridan discussed progress relative to procuring a PAUT and ToFD training program. We could not sole-source the program but had to put the contract up for bidding. The contract will likely be for one year with options for one-year extensions (up to five years). The contract language is still being worked on. The goal is to have a program by the end of fiscal year 2016. Mr. Sheridan also discussed some advantages of having an online/computer based PAUT/ToFD training program. c. Mr. Chance Styron discussed WTE and its importance in developing PAUT programs at the Shipyards. CWP funds are available to pay inspectors while receiving WTE, but the money does not cover travel costs. Mr. Styron informs the group of upcoming WTE opportunities including: (1) PSNS & IMF has 8 weeks’ worth of WTE, during which they will be conducting PAUT scans of known discontinuity sites for comparison with conventional UT results, including welder mock-ups and qualification plates for an upcoming production PAUT/ToFD inspection. Activities are encouraged to send as many inspectors as possible. During this time, Mr. Donn will also be at PSNS & IMF for inspectors to receive WTE. (2) PSNS & IMF will be conducting PAUT/ToFD inspections in San Diego, CA. These inspections are anticipated to provide 88 hours of WTE each for a combined total of 176 hours. This inspection is expected to occur in August 2016. (3) Mr. Donn and the PAUT/ToFD Examiner at PHNSY & IMF (Cory Arthur) will be available to provide WTE opportunities from October 2016 to March 2017. 5. Plan of Action & Milestones:

a. Identify candidates for PAUT/ToFD Level II qualification and when these candidates can travel to PSNS to acquire PAUT/ToFD WTE in the 8-week window. Notify Chance Styron at PSNS of the information.

ASSIGNED TO: Pat Roberts (PSNS) SCD: 29 July 2016

Derek Johnson (PHNSY) 29 July 2016

Amy Brinkley (NNSY) 29 July 2016

Adam Kubik (PNS) 29 July 2016

Kristian Smestad (EB Corp) 29 July 2016

b. Send candidates to PSNS to acquire WTE.

ASSIGNED TO: Pat Roberts (PSNS) SCD: 31 October 2016

Derek Johnson (PHNSY) 31 October 2016

Amy Brinkley (NNSY) 31 October 2016

Adam Kubik (PNS) 31 October 2016

Kristian Smestad (EB Corp) 31 October 2016

16 Enclosure (1)

c. Provide monthly updates (until complete) on the progress of procuring a PAUT/ToFD computer based training program via the monthly CWP conference call.

ASSIGNED TO: Chance Styron SCD: 30 September 2016

d. E-mail the CWP conference call information to the breakout session group.

ASSIGNED TO: Chance Styron SCD: 31 August 2016

17 Enclosure (1)

C. NDT EXAMINER DEVELOPMENT

1. Team Leader: Eugene Milton, NNSY

2. Team Members:

NAME ACTIVITY

Rick Sheridan PSNS & IMF

Pat Roberts PSNS & IMF

Derrick Washington NSWC-Carderock

Nathan Labonte PNS

Eric Rohrbacher PNS

HTCS Sean Huston SWOSU Great Lakes

Derek Johnson PHNSY & IMF

Samuel Palmer NNSY

Nona Brown PSNS & IMF

HTC Kyle Timm PSNS & IMF

Jeff Timms Oceaneering

Kristian Smestad EB Corp

Jim Booher MARMC

Jason Lasater PSNS & IMF

Theresa Lopez SWRMC

Jeff Adams SUPSHIP Bath

Todd Kinter SRF-Japan RMC

Dale Fosdyck FDRMC

Rob Hansen PSNS & IMF

Stephen Bristow NNSY

Erica Schumacher Extende

3. Purpose/Objective: To develop a streamlined approach to bridge the gap between newly certified NDT Examiners and seasoned NDT Examiners. 4. Breakout Synopsis: Personnel at each activity discussed their current state of Examiner development. All have similar issues relative to inexperienced Examiners, the career progression and development to become an Examiner. The group determined that development of a list of NDT Examiner core competencies would be beneficial. Activities could take that list and develop methods by which to develop inexperienced Examiners and potential Examiner candidates. The group will share best practices at next year’s NDT Working Group meeting. 5. Plan of Action & Milestones: a. Provide NNSY NDT Examiner core competencies to the group.

ASSIGNED TO: Eugene Milton SCD: 29 July 2016

18 Enclosure (1)

b. Lead quarterly conference call with the group to discuss NDT Examiner development.

ASSIGNED TO: Eugene Milton SCD: 30 September 2016

Eugene Milton 31 December 2016

Eugene Milton 31 March 2017

c. Establish a common list of NDT Examiner core competencies during first quarterly conference call.

ASSIGNED TO: ALL SCD: 30 September 2016

d. Share Examiner development best practices using the established core competencies at the 2017 NDT Working Group meeting.

ASSIGNED TO: Eugene Milton SCD: 31 May 2017

19 Enclosure (1)

D. HIRING FROM NDT COLLEGES

1. Team Leader: Wayne Rolland, PSNS & IMF

2. Team Members:

NAME ACTIVITY

Pat Roberts PSNS & IMF

Ethan Chung PHNSY & IMF

Gail Albright PHNSY & IMF

Eugene Milton NNSY

Stephen Bristow NNSY

Todd Grace SUPSHIP Groton

Bob Ossmann PSNS & IMF

Adam Kubik PNS

3. Purpose/Objective: To share lessons learned, best practices, and successes of the first round of hiring from NDT colleges. 4. Breakout Synopsis: Mr. Rolland and Mr. Rick Sheridan shared the results of hiring from NDT colleges with all activities. 5. Plan of Action & Milestones: a. Develop an oversight plan to verify whether each college’s training has changed since the last review.

ASSIGNED TO: Rick Sheridan SCD: 31 December 2016

b. Adjust existing WTE credit as appropriate based on the review in action 1.

ASSIGNED TO: Rick Sheridan SCD: 31 December 2016

c. Develop a coordinated recruiting trip schedule with the other Shipyards.

ASSIGNED TO: Wayne Rolland SCD: 31 March 2017

20 Enclosure (1)

E. NSTM CHAPTER 074, VOLUME 2 REVISION DRAFT

1. Team Leaders: Jason Hence, NAVSEA 04X6

2. Team Members:

NAME ACTIVITY

Jim Booher MARMC

HTC Kyle Timm PSNS & IMF

HTCS Sean Huston SWOSU Great Lakes

HT1 Brian Padley SWOSU Great Lakes

Theresa Lopez SWRMC

3. Purpose/Objective: To review proposed changes to the draft revision of NSTM

Ch. 074, Vol. 2. 4. Breakout Synopsis: The group performed a line-by-line review of the draft document. 5. Plan of Action & Milestones: a. Issue new draft revision for review based on comments provided during this breakout session.

ASSIGNED TO: Jason Hence SCD: 31 August 2016

21 Enclosure (1)

F. COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY DRAFT NAVSEA TECHNICAL PUBLICATION

1. Team Leader: Bob Ossmann, PSNS & IMF

2. Team Members:

NAME ACTIVITY

Karen Bruer Amee Bay

Brian White Carestream NDT

Steve Mango Carestream NDT

Bean Wyatt Carestream NDT

Gordy Daviscourt DCMA

Jeff Wagner DCMA

Barry Steamer EB Corp

Dean Lavinder HII-NNS

Danny Quandt Ingalls Shipbuilding

William Stricklin Ingalls Shipbuilding

Jim Booher MARMC

Joey Benton NSWC-Carderock

Ethan Chung PHNSY & IMF

Mark Dorley PNS

Steve Hietpas PNS

Rob Hansen PSNS & IMF

Rick Sheridan PSNS & IMF

Pat Shank SUPSHIP Groton

Mark Perreault TRF-Kings Bay

3. Purpose/Objective: To review the proposed draft NAVSEA Technical Publication for Computed Radiography. 4. Breakout Synopsis: The group performed a critical review of and discussed the remaining areas of concern. Some contentious items that the group tabled for further technical discussion included linear pixel mapping and digital enlargement. 5. Plan of Action & Milestones: a. Provide a copy of the group’s comments to Mr. Greg Mohr (BPMI) to discuss issues with Carestream NDT representatives during the week of the ASNT Digital Imaging conference.

ASSIGNED TO: Bob Ossmann SCD: COMPLETE

b. Get final resolution on remaining issues, finalize and submit the group’s change proposals to NAVSEA 05P2.

ASSIGNED TO: Bob Ossmann SCD: 30 September 2016

22 Enclosure (1)

G. NAVAL SHIPYARD VT COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE (CoP) FOLLOW-UP

1. Team Leader: Wayne Rolland, PSNS & IMF

2. Team Members:

NAME ACTIVITY

Nate Livesey NNSY

Nathan Labonte PNS

Adam Kubik PNS

Pat Roberts PSNS & IMF

Jason Lasater PSNS & IMF

Ernie Adams PSNS & IMF

Rick Sheridan PSNS & IMF

3. Purpose/Objective: To update the PNS Working Group representatives on the VT CoP meeting the week prior to the NDT Working Group. 4. Breakout Synopsis: The group discussed specific sticking points including inclusion of MIL-STD-1689 requirements for all activities and fillet weld throat measurements. 5. Plan of Action & Milestones: a. Establish a conference call to obtain PNS corporate alignment.

ASSIGNED TO: Wayne Rolland SCD: 15 August 2016

23 Enclosure (1)

H. PULSED TERAHERTZ IMAGING AND INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY

1. Team Leader: Dr. Patric Lockhart, NUWC-Newport

2. Team Members:

NAME ACTIVITY

Tim Tenopir NSWC-PHD

Joshua Richards PSNS & IMF

Jeromy Hudson PSNS & IMF

Jeremy Largey PSNS & IMF

Mark Angell PSNS & IMF

Jaret Nuccio PSNS & IMF

Michael Heesacker PSNS & IMF

Rick Sheridan PSNS & IMF

Wayne Rolland PSNS & IMF

Patrick O’Malia PSNS & IMF

3. Purpose/Objective: To address Terahertz (THz) Imaging and Infrared Thermography (IRT) capability questions and discuss the feasibility for new THz imaging and IRT NDT&E applications. 4. Breakout Synopsis: Break-out session included a re-brief of the WG presentation for Mr. Heesacker (PSNS & IMF Nuclear Engineering & Planning Manager), Mr. Largey (PSNS & IMF Head Nuclear Engineer), and Mr. Angell (PSNS & IMF QA Director). The breakout session content is business sensitive; Dr. Lockhart will track the resulting plan of actions and milestones. 5. Plan of Action & Milestones: SEE PARAGRAPH H.4 ABOVE.

24 Enclosure (1)

V. PREVIOUS WORKING GROUP ACTION ITEMS

2015-01 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Wayne Rolland, PSNS & IMF

Mr. Ethan Chung, PHNSY & IMF

Team Members:

Joey Turner – NNSY

Bob Affeldt – NNSY

Eric Nagata – PHNSY & IMF

Carl Nacario – PHNSY & IMF

Jason Lasater – PSNS & IMF

Mark Perreault – TRF-KB

Gary Pond – TRF-KB

NDT DIVISION ALIGNMENT

Purpose/Objective:

To discuss and define corporate NDT Division

challenges including:

Staffing/Using USA Jobs

Aligning NDT Position Descriptions

Trade Training Plans for NDT Apprentice

Program

Potential NAVSEA Tech Pub 271 Revision 1

impacts relative to oversight

WARR and resource forecasting

Actions:

1. Mr. Chung/Mr. Affeldt – Provide trade training plans

to the other activities.

ACTION COMPLETE

2. Mr. Rolland – Share NDT colleges information.

ACTION COMPLETE

3. Mr. Rolland – Collect each Shipyard’s Work Time

Experience requirements to ensure alignment.

ACTION COMPLETE

4. Mr. Pond – Send letter of designation format to other

activities.

ACTION COMPLETE

5. Mr. Rolland – Share PSNS & IMF WARR wiki with

the other activities.

ACTION COMPLETE

6. Mr. Perreault – Provide batch Group V PT equipment

information.

ACTION COMPLETE

7. Mr. Affeldt – Provide records management finding to

the other activities.

ACTION COMPLETE

25 Enclosure (1)

2015-01 (cont’d.) 8. Mr. Perreault – Distribute RT film processing lessons

learned to the other activities.

ACTION COMPLETE

9. Mr. Chung – Implement monthly NDT Division Head

conference call.

ACTION COMPLETE

10. Mr. Affeldt – Share common USA Jobs problems

that screen out candidates.

ACTION COMPLETE

7. Mr. Rolland – Develop and circulate availability

standard WARR template to the other activities.

ACTION COMPLETE

2015-02 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Rick Sheridan, PSNS & IMF

Team Members:

Jason Hence, SEA 04XQ

Rob Jonas, NNSY

Tom Metger, NNSY

Bob Affeldt, NNSY

Derek Johnson, PHNSY & IMF

Bernabe “Chip” Andrade, PHNSY&IMF

Kevin Hasegawa, PHNSY & IMF

Eric Rohrbacher, PNS

Craig Estes, PNS

Wayne Rolland, PSNS & IMF

Mark Perreault, TRF-KB

NAVAL SHIPYARD CORPORATE NDT

STANDARDIZATION

Purpose/Objective:

To discuss the current state of corporate NDT

procedure barriers to implementation.

Actions:

1. Mr. Sheridan – Re-establish monthly NDT

standardization conference call and POA&M.

ACTION COMPLETE

2. Add discussion to QA Directors Meeting that

Examiners need to meet in person to develop corporate

NDT procedures.

ACTION COMPLETE

26 Enclosure (1)

2015-03 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Al Perdido, PHNSY & IMF

Team Members:

Michelle Klenow, NNSY

William Barner, PNS

Renée Hardiman, PSNS & IMF

CORPORATE NDT ALIGNMENT OF GOVERNMENT

INSPECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES

Purpose/Objective:

To align the corporate UIPI for Government Inspectors.

Actions:

1. Mr. Perdido – Ensure GI responsibilities from all

cognizant manuals are incorporated into the UIPI.

ACTION COMPLETE

a. Mr. Barner – MIL-STD-791 & MIL-STD-1396

ACTION COMPLETE

b. Ms. Hardiman - NAVSEA 250-1500-1, NAVSEA

Tech Pub 278, Alloy Identity

ACTION COMPLETE

c. Ms. Klenow – NAVSEA Tech Pub 271, NSTR-99,

NAVSEA 0900-LP-001-7000, & MIL-STD-2195

ACTION COMPLETE

d. Mr. Perdido - MIL-STD-2132 & MIL-STD-1627

ACTION COMPLETE

2. ALL - Determine and align corporate qualifications

and training for GIs and include in the UIPI.

ACTION COMPLETE

3. ALL – Send draft UIPI for review/concurrence to

other Shipyards and NAVSEA.

ACTION COMPLETE

27 Enclosure (1)

2015-04 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Ken Donn, PHNSY & IMF

Team Members:

Cory Ervin, ACU-5

Keith Garrett, CMSD

Chris Arnold, HII-NNS

Roger Ehlers, InspecTesting

Mary Turner, InspecTesting

Jason Hence, NAVSEA 04XQ

Kirsten Green, NAVSEA 05P2

Larry Wheeler, NG Sunnyvale

Tom Metger, NNSY

Bob Affeldt, NNSY

Patric Lockhart, NUWC-NPT

Keith Erk, Olympus

Emilie, Peloquin, Olympus

Cory Arthur, PHNSY & IMF

Wayne, Ikeda, PHNSY & IMF

Shaun Chinen, PHNSY & IMF

James Fong, PHNSY & IMF

Carl Nacario, PHNSY & IMF

Kevin Hasegawa, PHNSY & IMF

Steve Mukai, PHNSY & IMF

Daniel Yamane, PHNSY & IMF

Ethan Chung, PHNSY & IMF

Kaui Aranita, PHNSY & IMF

Shari Ikehara, PHNSY & IMF

Nick Lenchanko, PHNSY & IMF

Kelly Yamashita, PHNSY & IMF

Eric Rohrbacher, PNS

Rick Sheridan, PSNS & IMF

Jason Lasater, PSNS & IMF

Pat Shank, SUPSHIP Groton

Joe Moser, SUPSHIP Newport News

Melanie Harden, SWRMC

Mark Perreault, TRF-KB

Gary Pond, TRF-KB

PHASED ARRAY UT/ToFD FOR STRUCTURAL

APPLICATIONS

Purpose/Objective:

To develop PAUT/ToFD of shipboard structural welds

including new welds and monitoring sites.

Actions:

1. Mr. Yamane & Mr. Pond – Discuss with the QA

Directors the need for all Naval Shipyards to be engaged

in the development of PAUT/ToFD for structural

applications.

ACTION COMPLETE

2. Mr. Hasegawa – Establish a monthly structural

PAUT/ToFD conference call for a new CWP initiative

including upcoming opportunities for WTE.

ACTION COMPLETE

3. Mr. Hence – Determine NAVSEA POC for IT issues

relative to NDT software and hardware.

ACTION COMPLETE

4. Mr. Donn – Establish a POA&M for development of

PAUT/ToFD training, procedures, and certification for

structural applications.

ACTION COMPLETE

5. Mr. Perreault, Mr. Rohrbacher, Mr. Sam Palmer

(NNSY), Mr. Lasater, Ms. Ikehara, Mr. Arnold, and Ms.

Barbara Johnson (EB Corp) - Determine the biggest

advantage PAUT/ToFD of structural welds will provide

for each respective activity (i.e., cost savings in man-

hours, schedule, quality of data, etc.).

ACTION COMPLETE

6. Mr. Donn – Inform the group of upcoming training

opportunities for PAUT/ToFD.

ACTION COMPLETE

28 Enclosure (1)

2015-05 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Dale Fosdyck, FDRMC

Team Members:

Richard Adams, FDRMC

Robin Workman, FDRMC

Andrew Debutiaco, InspecTesting

Richard Lowman, NAVSEA 06P

Bernabe “Chip” Andrade, PHNSY&IMF

Lawrence Patton, PHNSY & IMF

Kaui Aranita, PHNSY & IMF

Kevin Hasegawa, PHNSY & IMF

Eric Rohrbacher, PNS

Todd Kinter, SRF-Japan RMC

PHASED ARRAY UT/ToFD FOR STRUCTURAL

APPLICATIONS

Purpose/Objective:

To discuss the growing need for NDT Examiners in

forward deployed areas (i.e., SRF-Japan RMC, FDRMC,

etc.) and the personnel that are required when the 3-

year/5-year rule for rotation is enforced.

Actions:

1. Mr. Yamane & Mr. Pond – Discuss with the QA

Directors the need for all Naval Shipyards to be engaged

in the development of PAUT/ToFD for structural

applications.

ACTION COMPLETE

2. Mr. Adams – Revise forward-deployed NDT Examiner

position description.

ACTION COMPLETE

3. Mr. Rohrbacher – Research past Level III

examinations to determine if any activities are better

than others when preparing candidates for Level III; if

so, determine what that activity does better than

others.

ACTION COMPLETE

29 Enclosure (1)

2015-06 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Greg Cyr, NAVSEA 04Z

Team Members:

Dale Fosdyck, FDRMC

Jason Hence, NAVSEA 04XQ

Kirsten Green, NAVSEA 05P2

Richard Lowman, NAVSEA 06P

Kevin Hasegawa, PHNSY & IMF

Eric Rohrbacher, PNS

Doug Swisher, SUPSHIP Bath

Jeff Adams, SUPSHIP Bath

Pat Shank, SUPSHIP Groton

William Burns, SUPSHIP Gulf Coast

Joe Moser, SUPSHIP Newport News

SUPSHIP NDT TOPICS

Purpose/Objective:

To discuss the following issues specific to the SUPSHIP

NDT programs:

Technical Performance Evaluations (TPE)

Limited Certifications

NDT Examiner Recertification Requirements

Level III Examination Procedures and Grading

Policy

Computed Radiography and Phased Array UT

Oversight

SUPSHIP NDT Examination Facility

Requirements

Welding/Brazing Workmanship Training

Actions:

1. Mr. Cyr – Establish a conference call to discuss

ideas for and formalize a plan to move forward with

researching/developing an NDT Examiner development

program.

ACTION COMPLETE

2015-06 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Dr. Patric Lockhart, NUWC-NPT

Team Members:

Steve Kirkup, EB Corp.

Dr. Kirsten Green, NAVSEA 05P2

Matthew Sheehan, NSWC-PHD

Tim Tenopir, NSWC-PHD

CAPT Gustavo Vergara, PHNSY & IMF

CDR Joseph Keller, PHNSY & IMF

Dan Yamane, PHNSY & IMF

Shari Ikehara, PHNSY & IMF

Shaun Chinen, PHNSY & IMF

PULSED TERAHERTZ IMAGING

Purpose/Objective:

To address THz Imaging capability questions and

discuss feasibility for new THz Imaging NDT&E

applications.

Actions:

1. Dr. Lockhart – All of the actions associated with this

breakout session are business sensitive.

ALL ACTIONS COMPLETE

30 Enclosure (1)

2012-01 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Jason Hence, SEA 04X6NDT

Team Members:

NDT Working Group discussion.

CG-47 CLASS ALUMINUM WELDING MANUAL NDT

SEQUENCING

Mr. Hence led an informational discussion regarding

the NDT inspection requirements and sequencing as

specified in the 5XXX CG-47 Class Welding Manuals.

The issue is primarily to minimize heat input to the

aluminum base material in order to mitigate the risk of

sensitization and cracking. It seems that the inspection

requirements and sequencing in the manual can be

improved.

Action: Mr. Hence - Review and chop the document

and forward it to the CG-47 class manual change

group.

ACTION COMPLETE

2012-02 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Mark Perreault, TRF-KB

Team Members:

NDT Working Group discussion.

2015 UPDATE: ACTION COMPLETE.

Requirement changed to no longer

require UT certification in

accordance with TP-271.

LIMITED SCOPE UT THICKNESS QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. Perreault led an informational discussion regarding

the MRC-003 requirement for digital UT hull thickness

measurements. The MRC used to require

qualification/certification in accordance with TP-271.

The engineering group considered the requirement too

burdensome so the requirement was changed to be a

training and qualification program approved by the

Chief Engineer. The group agreed to a model program

for Dr. Green to take back to the PMS and SEA 07

groups as an example of an appropriate program to

control the quality of the thickness readings.

Action: Dr. Green, NAVSEA 05P24, take the suggested

program requirements back to the PMS and SEA 07

groups.

ACTION COMPLETE

31 Enclosure (1)

2012-03

Team Leader: Ms. Theresa Lopez,

SWRMC

Team Members:

Roger Ehlers – InspecTesting, Inc.

David Kilpela – InspecTesting, Inc.

Jacob Wilkerson – InspecTesting, Inc.

2015 UPDATE: Not incorporated

into TP-271 Rev 1. SWRMC to re-

submit change recommendation to

Dr. Green for future TP-271 revision.

2016 UPDATE: Will be evaluated for

inclusion into NAVSEA Tech Pub

271, Revision 2

2012-03 (cont’d.)

VALIDATION OF BLUE LIGHT TECHNOLOGY AS A

SUBSTITUTE FOR MERCURY VAPOR BLACK LIGHTS

IN FLUORESCENT MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING

Purpose/Objective:

Ms. Lopez, SWRMC, provided an update at the 2011

NDT Working Group on what inspection attributes need

to be standardized to improve this inspection technique.

The current wording of T9074-AS-GIB-010/271 calls for

the use of “black lights”, providing users with a single

option for illuminating fluorescent magnetic particles.

The development of new inspection light technologies,

such as blue light and LED-A lamps, provide NDT

communities with secondary options that are safer,

more versatile, and highly reliable in comparison to

traditional mercury vapor lamps. This study looks at

the feasibility of using blue lights as a suitable alternate

light source to the currently required black lights.

Breakout Synopsis:

This study compared the performance of a mercury

vapor black light against a blue light on the same

flawed test specimen. The test specimen selected for

this evaluation was a flawed weld sample displaying a

½” linear indication adjacent to the toe of the weld.

Basis for comparison was made solely by

visual/photographic comparison.

Action: Ms. Lopez, provide recommended lighting

evaluation wording to be submitted for the Draft TP-271

Revision.

32 Enclosure (1)

2012-04 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader: Mr. Brian Szabo, TRF

Kings Bay

Team Members:

Cynthia Curry – PNS

Derek Johnson – PHNSY & IMF

Stephen Bristow – NNSY

Traci Fritzinger – NSWCCD

Dr. Kirsten Green – NAVSEA 05P24

Matt Brantz – NAVSEA PMS 392T

Mark Perreault – TRF Kings Bay

Logan Goheen – Zetec

Russ Kok – Kok & Associates

2015 UPDATE: ALL ACTIONS

COMPLETE.

ET TUBE INSPECTION EVALUATION OF

INDICATIONS

Purpose/Objective:

ET Tube Inspection Evaluation Technique and

Processes relative to discontinuity characteristics.

Assurance of information and experience being passed

on to the next generation.

Breakout Synopsis:

Group discussion on Evaluation Process of particular

indication reviewed by six different activities. Mutual

Agreement on Process and need for community meeting

to discuss issues and problems that are of interest to all

activities. Need to capture experience of all activities

and exchange of information. Realignment of activities

in Evaluation Processes.

Actions:

1. Mr. Szabo agreed to send the ET data to Zetec to get

Vendor opinion, provide results to Working Group

participants, and discuss via TELECON.

ACTION COMPLETE (awaiting feedback from Zetec)

2. Mr. Szabo agreed to arrange a monthly TELECON for

the Public/Private Yards to discuss ET issues, lessons

learned and recent unique situations.

ACTION COMPLETE

3. Dr. Green agreed to request for NSWCCD to

investigate the feasibility of and fund an annual ET

Working Group to review data from all yards to align

evaluation techniques, new technology and

standardization.

ACTION COMPLETE

33 Enclosure (1)

2012-05 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader: Mr. Kenton Donn,

PSNS & IMF

Team Members:

Jason Hence – NAVSEA 04XQ5

Theresa Lopez – SWRMC

Jeff Kuehn – NNSY

Derek Johnson – PHNSY & IMF

Mark Perreault – TRF KB

HTC Eric Holmquist – CNE Great

Lakes

Ashlee Floyd – NSWCCD

Renée Hardiman – PSNS & IMF

Jeff Adams – SUPSHIP Bath

Erica Schumacher – Extende

2015 UPDATE: ALL ACTIONS

COMPLETE. Shipyards are hiring

from NDT Colleges.

NDT MANNING AND RECRUITMENT

Purpose/Objective:

The activities all have problems with establishing and

maintaining an appropriate number of NDT personnel,

especially with higher-level qualifications. The group

decided to:

1. Develop a plan to expand the recruitment base to

hire personnel with NDT experience, and

2. Develop a corporate strategy for career

placements (grade levels) of new employees with

established NDT experience (qualifications).

Actions:

1. Mr. Donn - Distribute a link/list to all group

members of ASNT’s list of NDT educational institutions.

ACTION COMPLETE

2. Mr. Donn - Investigate the feasibility of recruiting

trips to NDT colleges that would represent the entire

Navy NDT community.

ACTION COMPLETE

3. Mr. Donn and HTC Holmquist - Establish the

practice of providing the NSYs and other Naval activities

with a list of qualified military NDT inspectors who are

leaving the service.

ACTION COMPLETE

4. Mr. Hence - Investigate the possibility of establishing

a corporate website to publicize information regarding

NDT careers with NAVSEA.

ACTION COMPLETE

5. Mr. Donn - Investigate using LinkedIn to promote

recognition of NAVY as an NDT employer, and to seek

qualified applicants.

ACTION COMPLETE

6. Mr. Donn - Determine status of QA Director

development of new corporate Position Descriptions

that include consideration for a competitive entry grade

level for experienced NDT inspectors, and a grade/pay

34 Enclosure (1)

2012-05 (cont’d.) progression commensurate with achieving additional

NDT method certifications.

ACTION COMPLETE

7. Mr. Donn - Include application of existing NDT

training/experience into the Corporate Written Practice.

ACTION COMPLETE

2011-01 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader: Conference

Chairperson, Mr. Ron Flaherty

Team Members:

NDT Working Group discussion.

2015 UPDATE: ACTION COMPLETE.

SEA 05P2 Issued Guidance for

evaluation.

Evaluation of non-linear indications in base material

heat affect zone (HAZ)

Mr. Flaherty led an informational discussion regarding

the evaluation of non-linear indications in the 1/2”

base material/HAZ adjacent to the subject weld being

PT inspected. The fundamental issue is the acceptance

criteria is silent and past correspondence with NAVSEA

clarified that the silence was intentional and non-linear

indications did not require evaluation. There is

currently NAVSEA concern with not evaluating non-

linear indications in the HAZ. Public Naval Shipyards

and NDT Working Group are standing by for NAVSEA

05 guidance.

Action: Dr. Green, NAVSEA 05P24, adjudicate this

issue.

ACTION COMPLETE

2011-02

Team Leader:

Mr. Ron Flaherty, SEA 04XQ5

Team Members:

NDT Working Group discussion.

2015 UPDATE: UNDER REVIEW

Evaluation of Quantitative Quality Indicators (QQI)

An informational discussion regarding the use and

incorporation of the QQI into TP-271 to determine

adequacy of a magnetic field (i.e., allow the use of

something other than the traditional field indicator [pie

gage])

Action: Dr. Green, NAVSEA 05P24, evaluate the use of

QQIs with the intent to incorporate into TP-271.

2016 UPDATE: Will be evaluated for inclusion into

NAVSEA Tech Pub 271, Revision 2

35 Enclosure (1)

2011-03

Team Leader:

Mr. Ron Flaherty, SEA 04XQ5

Team Members:

NDT Working Group discussion.

TP-278 Scribe Line to Determine Insertion and Weld Size

Discussion took place to determine if TP-278 footnotes that

address the applicability of scribe lines as it applies to

determining proper pipe insertion and weld size. Are the

requirements clear with regard to whether or not scribe lines

are required in all cases for the evaluation of end gap and

weld size (e.g., how do welders and inspectors prove weld

size end gap and weld size without a benchmark?). Dr.

Green suggested the Working Group solicit input for Mr.

Gene Mitchell the TP-278 TWH.

Action: Ms. Theresa Lopez (SWRMC) and Mr. Jeff Jacobs

(SUPSHIP Bath) agreed to take action to address this issue.

2015 UPDATE: Not incorporated. SWRMC to re-submit

change recommendation to TP278 TWH.

2016 UPDATE: SWRMC re-submitted change

recommendation during Industry Review of draft

NAVSEA Tech Pub 278 revision.

36 Enclosure (1)

2011-04

Team Leader:

Mr. Jeffrey Warren, NSWC-CD

Team Members:

Joey Benton - SUPSHIP Newport News

Marc Cantara - PNS

Bob Osmond - PSNS&IMF

Dan Kaltenbaugh - BPMI

Russ Kok - K&A, Inc.

Ron Flaherty - NAVSEA 04XQ5

Jason Hence - PHNSY&IMF

Jimmy Sands - NNSY

Pat Shank - SUPSHIP Groton

Karen Bruer - Amee Bay

Review/Comment on the April 2011 Newport News

Shipbuilding Hosted Digital Radiography Workshop

Proposed Computed Radiography (CR) Documents

Actions:

1. Mr. Warren provides Team members the April 2011

Newport News Shipbuilding Hosted Digital Radiography

Workshop proposal CR documents by June 2011.

2. Team members review and comment. Review should

focused with the approach that the provide document is

what NAVSEA plans to incorporate into TP-271. Initial

focus should be CR requirements in the context of weld

procedure and weld qualification plates (i.e., the

inspection of welds in plate and piping).

3. Comments should be provided to Mr. Warren no

later than September 2011, with the intent to begin

addressing unresolved items in 2012.

4. Mr. Warren compiles collected comments and

recommendations, and present to NAVSEA 05P24, Dr.

Green, with copies sent to Breakout Team Members.

5. Report results/status at the 2012 NDT Working

Group.

2015 UPDATE: Final draft reviewed/resolved.

Document ready for formatting and final

Government/Industry Review.

2016 UPDATE: Draft NAVSEA Tech Pub document

in Industry Review.

37 Enclosure (1)

2011-05 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Ron Flaherty, SEA 04XQ5

Team Members:

NDT Working Group discussion.

2015 UPDATE: ACTION COMPLETE.

All SUPSHIPs are aware of PAUT

qualification requirements.

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION QUALITY

ASSURANCE PROGRAM (CAQAP) - TRAINING OF

GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL PERFORMING

OVERSIGHT OF CONTRACT PERFORMED NDT

Discussed the training of CAQAP personnel who provide

oversight of contractor performed non-traditional NDT

(i.e., PAUT & TOFD). This issue presented itself as a

result of NAVSEA 05P24 conditional approval of Bath

Iron Works (BIW) to perform PAUT & TOFD. It was

reported that the approval was based on the condition

that government oversight be in place. Currently

NSWC-CD, Mr. Collins, is performing PAUT and TOFD

oversight. Mr. Collins was concerned with when he is

not available to provide the required/necessary

oversight, and the SUPSHIP Bath long-term plan of

action to provide oversight of BIW as required by the

SUPSHIP Operations Manual (SOM).

Discussion took place on:

How do SUPSHIP Bath personnel qualify and certify in PAUT?

Where the training would be conducted (PNS, Puget, etc.) and who would pay for the training?

Zetec spoke on how they get their inspectors/Examiners trained and that a good UT Examiner can pick up PAUT fairly easily.

Ms. Green mentioned that we do not have any props or a test plan.

What does it take for a NAVSEA certified Examiner to become considered qualified in PAUT and TOFD?

Action: Mr. Flaherty agreed to inform NAVSEA 04Z,

Mr. John “Mike” Adams, of the long-term actions

necessary to address the oversight of PAUT and TOFD,

potential trainers and training sites, and funding.

38 Enclosure (1)

2010-01 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Kenton Donn - PSNS&IMF

Team Members:

Michael Tretter - NGUS

Kelvin Howard - SSGC

Mark Perreault - TRFKB

Theresa Lopez - SWRMC

Jim Booher - NSSA

Eugene Carroll - TRF-KB

Barry Steamer - EBC

Renee Hardiman - PSNS&IMF

Ron Flaherty - NAVSEA 04XQ5

TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF

NONDESTRUCTIVE TEST PERSONNEL BY

INSPECTION SHOPS/CODES

1. PSNS & IMF has submitted a request to NAVSEA

04XQ (letter Ser 138/035 dated 3 May 2010) to allow

technical and training personnel from the inspection

organizations or the production training code to

conduct the TPE’s in lieu of the NDT Test Examiner.

The request was forwarded by NAVSEA 04XQ5 to

NAVSEA 05P24 NDT Technical Warrant Holder for

action.

2. Report progress/results at next year’s NDT Working

Group Conference. During the 2011 NDT Working

Group Dr. Green agreed in principle to the PSNS&IMF

request.

Action: Mr. Flaherty, NAVSEA 04XQ5, agreed assist

NAVSEA 05P24 and take action to respond and

conditionally approve the PSNS&IMF request.

2012 UPDATE: ACTION COMPLETE. Approval

Letter distributed to Working Group attendees.

Approval and conditions written into TP-271 Draft

Revision.

39 Enclosure (1)

2010-03 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Ms. Barbara Johnson – EB Corp.

Team Members:

Bruce Bandos - NSWC-CD

Dick Collins - NSWC-CD

John Gagnon - PNS

Chris Arnold - NGNN

Kenton Donn - PSNS & IMF

John Dashiell - NNSY

Jim Booher - NSSA

RETRACTABLE BOW PLANE – GUIDE RAIL UT

INSPECTION

Ms. Barbara Johnson, Electric Boat Corporation,

provided an update at the 2011 NDT Working Group on

what inspection attributes need to be standardized to

improve this inspection technique.

Action: Ms. Johnson and Mr. Jim Booher, NSSA,

develop and submit procedure to the Submarine

Maintenance Engineering, Planning and Procurement

(SUBMEPP) Activity, which should standardize the

inspection technique. Mr. Collins and Flaherty offered

assistance.

2012 UPDATE: ACTION COMPLETE. Concern

appears not be an issue any longer because

activities have not performed the inspection in

years. The issue will be rolled over to next Working

Group to confirm.

40 Enclosure (1)

2009-02

Team Leader:

Mr. Bob Ossmann - PSNS&IMF

Team Members:

Barry Steamer - EBC J. Booher - MARMC T. Lopez - SWRMC E.L.K Switzer - Tradewind Group Jon Stewart - NGMS Dale Fosdyck - PHNSY&IMF Greg Selbe - PHNSY&IMF Alan Valvo - DCMA Bill Todd - PHNSY&IMF Pat Shank - SUPSHIP Groton Karen Bruer - Amee Bay, LLC

2015 UPDATE: Final draft changes resolved. Document ready for formatting and final Government/Industry Review.

MIL-STD 2035 CHANGE PROPOSALS: In September

2009, Mr. Bob Ossmann, PSNS&IMF, submitted to

NAVSEA 05P24 a draft rewrite of MS-2035A (MS-2035),

which represented a collective effort of various Naval

and Private Sector NDT activities. Recommended

changes and proposals were submitted with the

objective of making MS-2035 not only easier to navigate

but also to provide further detail in areas where the

NDT community felt it was needed. The proposals are

documented in a Change Proposal Topic List (CPTL)

that accompanied the document. The CPTL is a

running list of 102 recommendations and/or proposals

that has served as an ongoing discussion between the

NDT activities involved in this project. The draft rewrite

reflects a majority consensus, for the most part, as to

how the NDT community would like to see these

sections rewritten in the next revision of MS-2035.

Action: Dr. Green, NAVSEA 05P24

2016 UPDATE: Draft document scheduled to be

released for Industry Review NLT August 2016.

41 Enclosure (1)

2005-01 (COMPLETE)

Team Leader:

Mr. Rob Bruins - PSNS&IMF

Team Members:

Dale Apicelli - SUPSHIP Groton

Barry Steamer - EBC

Chris Arnold - NGNN

James McNabb - NNSY

Gary Pond - TRF-KB

Doreen Kahue - PHNSY&IMF / HRMC

Marc Cantara - PNS

Michael Usui - PHNSY&IMF

Daniel Quandt - NG Ship Systems

Carroll Richards - SS BATH

Ronnie Rude - PSNS&IMF

Karen Bruer - CVN 75

CLARIFICATION AND PROPOSED CHANGE TO TP-

271

Throughout 2005, select members of the working group

will periodically discuss clarifications or change

proposals to TP-271. PSNS&IMF ensure the 2006 NDT

Working Group is updated on the 2005 clarifications

and/or proposed changes submitted to NAVSEA 05.

During the 2006 NDT Working Group a Breakout took

place to address concerns associated with Ultrasonic

Test (UT) inspection. At the conclusion of the Breakout,

the following recommended changes were provided to

NAVSEA 05. Breakout was as follows:

2006 UT REQUIREMENT CHANGES FOR TP-271,

REVISION 1 “DRAFT”

Team Leader: Chris Arnold - NGNN

Team Members:

Joey Benton - SUPSHIP Newport News

Rob Bruins - PSNS & IMF

Dick Collins - PNS

Barbara Johnson - EBC

Chris Wray - NNSY

Purpose/Objective: Discuss changes to the UT section

of TP-271, as proposed by NGNN and EBC, to be

incorporated into the upcoming revision of that

document.

Breakout Synopsis: The team reviewed the entire UT

section of TP-271. The team agreed to numerous

changes throughout the section. The most notable was

an extensive rewrite of the weld inspection

requirements.

Plan of Action(s) with Milestones (Actions & Due

Date): The proposed UT changes, as agreed upon by the

team, were presented to NAVSEA for review and

inclusion into the upcoming TP-271 revision.

Action: Dr. Green, NAVSEA 05P24

2015 UPDATE:

ACTION COMPLETE. NAVSEA Tech

Pub 271, Revision 1 issued.

42 Enclosure (1)

VI. NDT WORKING GROUP MEETING ATTENDEES

Last Name First

Name E-mail Address Title Organization Phone Number

Adams Ernie ernie.adams@navy.mil NDT Trainer Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (360) 476-0002

Adams Jeff jeffery.adams@supshipba.navy.mil NDT Examiner SUPSHIP Bath (207) 442-5947

Albright Gail gail.albright@navy.mil NDT Examiner Pearl Harbor Naval

Shipyard & IMF

(808) 473-8000

ext. 2181

Arnold Chris Chris.Arnold@hii-nns.com NDT Examiner HII - Newport News

Shipbuilding (757) 688-4850

Barner William william.barner@navy.mil

Nuclear Government

Inspector

Portsmouth Naval

Shipyard (207) 451-7793

Benton Joey joel.benton@navy.mil NDT Examiner NSWC–Carderock Division

(215) 200-1238

Booher James James.booher@navy.mil NDT Examiner Mid-Atlantic RMC (757) 443-2650

ext. 3419

Brinkley Amy amy.brinkley@navy.mil

NDT Division Branch

Head Norfolk Naval Shipyard (757) 396-5077

Bristow Stephen stephen.m.bristow@navy.mil

NDT Division Branch

Head Norfolk Naval Shipyard (757) 636-4936

Brown Joe william.j.brown3@navy.mil NDT Division Head Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (Bangor) (360) 315-1411

Brown Nona nona.brown@navy.mil

NDT Examiner Branch Head

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard & IMF

(360) 476-2990

Bruer Karen kbruer@ameebay.com

Quality Manger /

NDT Examiner Amee Bay, LLC (757) 217-2726

Bublitz Nicholas nickb@veriphase.net

Global Product

Analyst VeriPhase (836) 627-3637

Carpinello Thomas tacarpinello@bwxt.com NDE Manager Babcock & Wilcox (330) 515-6155

Chung Ethan ethan.chung@navy.mil NDT Division Head Pearl Harbor Naval

Shipyard & IMF

(808) 473-8000

ext. 3655

Colahan Paul Paul.Colahan@navy.mil

Director, Oversight &

Assessment NAVSEA 04 (202) 781-3304

43 Enclosure (1)

Last Name First

Name E-mail Address Title Organization Phone Number

Daviscourt Gordon Gordon.daviscourt@DCMA.mil NDT Examiner DCMA (408) 431-5131

Donn Kenton Kdonn@lce.com

Senior Engineering

Technician Life Cycle Engineering (360) 286-3549

Dorley Mark mark.dorley@navy.mil

NDT Engineering

Technician

Portsmouth Naval

Shipyard (207) 438-4191

Fallick Jon jfallick@GryphonLC.com Materials SME Gryphon Technologies (571) 730-7834

Fosdyck Dale dale.fosdyck@eu.navy.mil QA & NDT Examiner Forward Deployed RMC

(Naples)

011-39-081-568-

7861

Garrett Keith kgarrett@continentalmaritime.com NDT Examiner Continental Maritime of

San Diego (619) 247-1439

Grace Todd todd.grace@supshipgr.navy.mil NDT Examiner SUPSHIP Groton (860) 961-8661

Green kirsten kirsten.green@navy.mil

NDT & E Technical Warrant Holder

NAVSEA 05P (301) 227-5074

Hageman Joseph joseph.hageman@navy.mil NDT Trainer Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (360) 476-3321

Hansen Rob robert.j.hansen@navy.mil NDT Examiner Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (360) 476-2990

Hardiman Renee renee.hardiman@yahoo.com

Nuclear Government

Inspector

Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (360) 340-3970

Hence Jason jason.hence@navy.mil

NDT & Welding

Programs Manager NAVSEA 04X6 (360) 476-4244

Hietpas Steven steven.x.hietpas@navy.mil NDT Trainer Portsmouth Naval Shipyard

(207) 438-4191

Hileman Travis travis.hileman@navy.mil NDT Examiner Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (360) 476-2990

Huston Sean sean.huston@navy.mil

NAVSEA Certification

Agency Examiner SWOSU Great Lakes (847) 688-2088

Jefferson Traci traci.jefferson@navy.mil

Engineering Technician

NSWC–Carderock Division

(301) 227-4055

Johnson Derek Derek.j.johnson@navy.mil

NDT Tech Support

Branch Head

Pearl Harbor Naval

Shipyard & IMF

(808) 473-8000

ext. 3469

44 Enclosure (1)

Last Name First

Name E-mail Address Title Organization Phone Number

Jonas Robert robert.jonas@navy.mil NDT Division Head Norfolk Naval Shipyard (757) 646-1508

Killeen Sean sean.killeen@olympus-ossa.com

Technical Sales

Representative

Olympus Corporation of

the Americas (206) 200-6089

Kimura Katsumi katsumi.kimura.ja@srf.navy.mil NDT Examiner SRF – Japan RMC (Det

Sasebo)

011-81-95-650-

6618

Kinter Todd Todd.kinter@srf.navy.mil

NDT Program Manager

SRF-Japan RMC (Yokosuka)

011-81-46-816-5753

Klenow Michelle michelle.klenow@navy.mil

Nuclear Government

Inspector Norfolk Naval Shipyard (757) 708-2711

Kubik Adam adam.kubik@navy.mil

NDT Division General

Foreman

Portsmouth Naval

Shipyard (207) 451-7211

Labonte Nathan nathan.labonte@navy.mil NDT Examiner Portsmouth Naval

Shipyard (207) 438-2166

Lasater Jason jason.lasater@navy.mil

NDT Division General

Foreman

Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (360) 476-8670

Lavinder Dean dean.lavinder@hii-nns.com NDT Examiner HII - Newport News

Shipbuilding (757) 380-2453

Livesey Nathan nathan.livesey@navy.mil NDT Engineer Norfolk Naval Shipyard (757) 967-4287

Lockhart Patric patric.lockhart@navy.mil Lead Engineer NUWC-Newport (401) 832-4462

Lopez Theresa Theresa.M.Lopez@navy.mil NDT Examiner Southwest RMC (619) 556-6591

Mandokoro Yasuhiro Yasuhiro.mandokoro@shi-g.com Senior Engineer Sumitomo Heavy

Industries

011-81-46-823-

1728

Mango Steve steven.mango@carestream.com

Worldwide Technical

Manager Carestream NDT (585) 627-6523

Menken Charles cgmenken@bwxt.com Lead NDT Examiner Babcock & Wilcox (330) 203-7324

Milton III Eugene eugene.milton@navy.mil

NDT Examiner

Branch Head Norfolk Naval Shipyard (757) 635-0604

Mullay Carlo Carlo.Mullay@Olympus-ossa.com Area Sales Manager Olympus America (323) 630-8828

45 Enclosure (1)

Last Name First

Name E-mail Address Title Organization Phone Number

O’Malia Patrick Patrick.omalia@navy.mil

Government

Inspector

Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (360) 535-2960

Ooizumi Shintaro shintaro.ooizumi.ja@srf.navy.mil NDT Examiner SRF-Japan RMC

(Yokosuka)

011-81-46-816-

5753

Ossmann Bob robert.ossmann@navy.mil NDT Examiner Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (360) 315-1905

Padley Brian Brian.Padley@navy.mil

Assistant NAVSEA

Certification Agency Examiner

SWOSU Great Lakes (847) 688-2088

Palmer Sam samuel.w.palmer1@navy.mil NDT Examiner Norfolk Naval Shipyard (757) 354-6140

Peloquin Emilie Emilie.peloquin@olympus-

ossa.com

Product Manager

NDT

Olympus Scientific

Solutions (281) 832-9361

Perdido Al al.perdido@navy.mil

Nuclear Government

Inspector

Pearl Harbor Naval

Shipyard & IMF

(808) 473-8000

ext. 6329

Perreault Mark mark.perreault@navy.mil NDT Division Head TRF-Kings Bay (912) 573-2936

Powers Gregory gregory.powers@navy.mil NDT Examiner Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (360) 315-1916

Quandt Daniel Daniel.quandt@hii-Ingalls.com NDT Manager Ingalls Shipbuilding (228) 935-4647

Raymond Daniel draymond@pacship.com NDT Examiner Pacific Ship Repair &

Fabrication (360) 536-2918

Roberts Patrick patrick.j.roberts@navy.mil

NDT Tech Support Branch Head

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard & IMF

(360) 340-7550

Rohrbacher Eric eric.rohrbacher@navy.mil NDT Examiner Portsmouth Naval

Shipyard (207) 438-1331

Rolland Wayne wayne.rolland@navy.mil NDT Division Head Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (360) 476-8670

Schumacher Erica erica.schumacher@extende.com Vice President Extende Inc. (518) 490-2376

Shank Patrick patrick.shank@supshipgr.navy.mil NDT Examiner SUPSHIP Groton (860) 433-2319

46 Enclosure (1)

Last Name First

Name E-mail Address Title Organization Phone Number

Sheehan Matthew Matthew.sheehan2@navy.mil Research Scientist NSWC PHD (805) 228-5708

Sheridan Rick Rick.sheridan@navy.mil

Weld Eng. & NDT

Examiner Div. Head

Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF 360-627-3456

Smestad Kristian ksmestad@gdeb.com NDT Examiner Electric Boat Corp. (860) 433-5812

Steamer Barry bsteamer@gdeb.com

NDT Examiner

Supervisor Electric Boat Corp. (860) 433-7035

Stricklin Bill William.stricklin@hii-Ingalls.com Examiner Ingalls Shipbuilding (228) 935-8099

Styron Jacob Jacob.c.styron@navy.mil NDT Examiner Puget Sound Naval Shipyard & IMF

(360) 476-2990

Takano Mikio Mikio.takano.ja@srf.navy.mil NDT Examiner SRF-Japan RMC 011-81-46-816-5753

Takeuchi Toyoji Toyoji.takeuchi@shi-g.com

Chief General

Manager

Sumitomo Heavy

Industries

011-81-46-823-

1728

Tenopir Tim tim.tenopir@navy.mil Research Scientist NSWC–Port Hueneme

Division (805) 228-6411

Timm Kyle kyle.l.timm@navy.mil NDT Examiner Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard & IMF (Everett) (425) 304-5594

Timms Jeffery jtimms@oceaneering.com NDT Examiner Oceaneering Marine

Services (757) 985-3776

Turner Joey joey.turner@navy.mi l NDT Trainer Norfolk Naval Shipyard (757) 396-3848

Urwiller Steven surwiller@eagle.org

Director of Govt.

Programs and Survey ABS (281) 877-6043

Voelker Jerry Jerry.voelker@ridgewater.edu NDT Instructor Ridgewater College (320) 234-8579

Wagner Frank FrankW@Inspectesting.com

Quality Engineer /

NDT Examiner INSPECTesting (619) 477-3670

Wagner Jeffrey Jeffrey.wagner@dcma.mil NDT Examiner DCMA (224) 475-9850

Washington Derrick derrick.washington@navy.mil NDT Technician NSWC-Carderock (301) 227-2384

47 Enclosure (1)

Last Name First

Name E-mail Address Title Organization Phone Number

Wedel Lawrence Lawrence.Wedel@hii-nns.com NDT Examiner HII-Newport News

Shipbuilding (757) 688-3063

White Brian brian.white@carestream.com Technical Manager Carestream NDT (585) 627-8017

Williamson John john.williamson2@hii-amsec.com NDT Examiner AMSEC, LLC (757) 567-0202

Workman Robin robin.l.workman@navy.mil NDT Examiner Norfolk Naval Shipyard (757) 967-4295

Wyatt Beau beau.wyatt@carestream.com SE Territory Manager Carestream NDT (850) 316-5476