EMS/MMS Agenda – Thursday, November 30, 2006
-
Upload
maris-koch -
Category
Documents
-
view
37 -
download
1
description
Transcript of EMS/MMS Agenda – Thursday, November 30, 2006
http://nodal.ercot.com 1Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System
EMS/MMS Projects
Requirement Documents
November 30, 2006
Al Hirsch
EMS/MMS Project Manager
http://nodal.ercot.com 2Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – Thursday, November 30, 2006
EMS & MMS Project Status Update
Overview of Submitted Outage Scheduler Requirements
Report on TPTF Comments on MMS Requirements
Presentation & Overview of EMS/MMS Whitepapers
http://nodal.ercot.com 3Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – EMS & MMS Project Status Update
MMS Phase 1 & Phase 2 Accelerated SCED Milestones
http://nodal.ercot.com 4Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – EMS & MMS Project Status Update
http://nodal.ercot.com 5Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – EMS & MMS Project Status Update
MMS Phase 2 Milestones
SCED FAT
MMS FAT
http://nodal.ercot.com 6Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – EMS & MMS Project Status Update
MMS Phase 2 – Accelerated SCED Delivery
http://nodal.ercot.com 7Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – EMS & MMS Project Status Update
MMS Phase 2 – MMS Delivery
http://nodal.ercot.com 8Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – EMS & MMS Project Status Update
MMS Phase 2 – Original Integrated MMS Delivery
http://nodal.ercot.com 9Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – EMS & MMS Project Status Update
EMS FAT –Still A Target
http://nodal.ercot.com 10Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – EMS & MMS Project Status Update
http://nodal.ercot.com 11Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
Presented By:Sai Moorty
MMS Project Engineer
EMS/MMS Agenda – Overview of Submitted Outage Scheduler Requirements
http://nodal.ercot.com 12Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – Overview of Submitted Outage Scheduler Requirements
Outage Scheduler Requirements Document Submitted for TPTF Review on November 22, 2006
TPTF review comments due to ERCOT on December 8, 2006
Informal TPTF review feedback is that Outage Types listed in Requirements documents are more than that specified in the Nodal Protocols. ERCOT is of the opinion that the Outage Types listed in the
Requirements Document are needed. However, ERCOT is analyzing the feasibility of treating the Outage Types of concern as Sub-Types of Outage Types defined in the Nodal Protocols.
http://nodal.ercot.com 13Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – Report on Received Comments on MMS Requirements
5 Spreadsheets detailing the disposition of TPTF review comments on MMS Requirements documents.
Accepted: Requirements document to be changed as per review comment.
Clarification Provided* : Requirements document to be changed as well as clarification provided in spreadsheet
Clarification Provided: Clarification provided in spreadsheet
Response: Moved to IDA Punch List – Issues predominantly pertaining to interfaces with other ERCOT systems.
Rejected: Review comment rejected as it does not comply with Nodal Protocols.
http://nodal.ercot.com 14Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – Report on Received Comments on MMS Requirements
5 Clarification notes are also provided on the following topics: Explanation of Market Submission Items Ancillary Service Offer Modeling CRR related issues in DAM Pricing Issues with Fixed Quantity Block Offers and Bids in DAM Additional information regarding Competitive Constraint Test
Procedures (option to add this as an appendix to CCT Requirements document)
http://nodal.ercot.com 15Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – Presentation Overview of Eight (8) EMS/MMS Whitepapers
Objective: Concurrence and disposition from TPTF of concepts described in
White Papers Refine design direction based upon TPTF feedback
Background: Requirements analysis of Real-Time Operations related to Load
Frequency Control (LFC) and its interaction with Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) raised some issues.
Subsequent discussions between ERCOT, Vendors (AREVA and ABB) and Floyd Trefny (Consultant) resulted in decision to submit White Papers to TPTF for review.
http://nodal.ercot.com 16Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – Presentation Overview of Eight (8) EMS/MMS Whitepapers
HDL And LDL During Start up and AS Recall During Responsive Reserve recall if the calculated HDL falls below LSL then calculate:
HDL = LDL = Max (POWERTELEM - (SCED Down Ramp Rate * 5), LASL)
During Generation Resource startup when POWERTELEM is above 90% but less than LSL then calculate
LDL = HDL = Min (Actual Gen + (SCED Up Ramp Rate * 5), HASL)
During Generation Resource startup when POWERTELEM falls below 90% of LSL then calculate
HDL = LDL = POWERTELEM
SCED Base Point Dispatch QSEs will receive the following two Base Point values for each Resource:
The Base Point as calculated by SCED at every SCED execution The Updated Desired Base Point updated every 4 seconds by LFC. The Updated Desired Base Points
represent the ERCOT desired control each LFC cycle
Ancillary Service Schedules and Deployment Telemetry Expand the set of data to be telemetered from QSE to ERCOT to include the Ancillary Service
Resource Responsibility for each participating Resource
http://nodal.ercot.com 17Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – Presentation Overview of Eight (8) EMS/MMS Whitepapers
Responsive Reserve Deployment and Recall ERCOT’s deployment of RRS to QSEs will include the following two
signals: RRS capacity deployment signal wherein each QSE will simply adjust their RRS schedule
on their Resources and wait for SCED to produce new Base Points that can include additional Responsive Reserve MW requirement.
RRS energy deployment signal that requires each QSEs to produce that additional energy through their own deployment to its Resources providing RRS.
QSE’s telemetry to ERCOT will include the following two signals: Signal to indicate the RRS Resource Responsibility Signal to indicate the remaining RRS Ancillary Service Schedule that is the difference
between the RRS Resource Responsibility amount and deployed amount. Non-Spin Deployment Notification and Availability
QSEs are requested to provide to ERCOT two data items related to Non-Spin: Non-Spin Responsibility (reflects Non-Spin obligation for the Resource where deployed or
not deployed) Non-Spin Ancillary Service Schedule (normally equal to Non-Spin responsibility, changes
to zero when the QSE makes the Resource available for dispatch following an ERCOT request for Non-Spin deployment, and returns to the Non-Spin responsibility value when ERCOT recalls Non-Spin).
http://nodal.ercot.com 18Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – Presentation Overview of Eight (8) EMS/MMS Whitepapers
Base Point above HASL Flags It will not be necessary to implement either the “Base Point above HASL”
or “Pseudo-Resource Dispatch” flags in the ICCP telemetry to QSEs Indication of Pseudo-Resource Dispatch will be provided in the MIS Secure
Area
Coincidental Deployment of Up and Down Regulation LFC should not be artificially constrained in a way that regulation
deployment of some QSEs may have opposite signs from the other QSEs
Emergency Base points Calculation and Deployment During SCED failure, Emergency Base Points will be calculated and issued
to QSEs through Generation Subsystem in the EMS. Distribution of Emergency Base Points will cause the current regulation deployment to be reset the same as an update of the SCED solution
http://nodal.ercot.com 19Lead from the front
Texas Nodal
EMS/MMS Agenda – Conclusion
Wrap-Up
Next Steps