Empiric Antimicrobial therapy for different types of Gall...

download Empiric Antimicrobial therapy for different types of Gall ...drkseema.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/AST-for-GB-Pathology.pdf · Empiric Antimicrobial therapy for different types

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of Empiric Antimicrobial therapy for different types of Gall...

  • Empiric Antimicrobial therapy for different types of Gall bladder pathologies based on

    Bacterial etiology

    S.Rohra**, KP Balsara*, AA Poojary**, Vardhini W*, T.E.Udwadia*, N.Doctor*, K.Kapadia

    *Dept of Surgery **Dept. of Pathology & Microbiology

    Breach Candy Hospital Trust

  • Introduction

    Laura M. Stintont et al, Gut and Liver, Vol. 6, No. 2, April 2012, 172-187

  • Introduction

    Symptomatic Cholelithiasis - Cholecystectomy

    Bactobilia 20 - 46 %

    Varies with different gall bladder pathologies

    Relation ship between bactobilia, wound infection and post operative wound complication

    Post-operative wound infection 7-20 %

    Mohammad Moazeni-Bistgani, et al. Acta Medica Iranica, 2013; 51(11): 779-783 A Suri, et al. The Internet Journal of Surgery Volume 22 Number 2 Vasitha Abeysuriya, et al. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2008; 7: 633-637 Faraz Ahmad,et al . International Journal of Scientific Study | July 2014 | Vol 2 | Issue 4

  • Objective of the study

    To identify aerobic & anaerobic bacteria in patients with gall bladder disease

    Perform susceptibility tests

    Formulate an empiric policy for antimicrobials agents

  • Ethics & Disclosures

    The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board & the Ethics Committee at Breach Candy Medical Research Center (BCMRC)

    Grant for conducting the study was given by BCMRC

  • Inclusion Criteria

    All cases where cholecystectomy was performed for gall bladder disease due to any cause

  • Diagnosis of cholecystitis

    1. Acute Cholecystitis was diagnosed by

    Clinical evaluation

    WBC count >10,000

    elevated CRP

    USG/ CT scan / MRCP

    CBD stones diagnosed on MRCP / ERCP

    2. Acalculous cholecystitis was diagnosed when inflammatory existed without stones

    3. Chronic cholecystitis, when pts. had recurrent attacks of pain and imaging was s/o of chronic disease

  • Material and Methods

    Prospective study: April 2014 to May 2015

    Samples accepted : Bile

    Pus

    Swab

    Demographic and clinical details of the patient was recorded

    from GB

  • Materials and Methods

    Aerobic culture

    Specimens were inoculated onto 5% sheep blood, chocolate and MacConkey agar plates for aerobic and facultative organisms.

    The plates were incubated aerobically (MacConkey agar) or under 5% C02 (5% sheep blood and chocolate agars) at 37C and examined at 24 and 48 h.

    Culture positive samples were processed using the automated Vitek 2 Compact system for identification & susceptibility

  • Materials and Methods

    Anaerobic culture

    Specimens were processed on SBA & anaerobic agar

    The plates were incubated in anaerobic pouches with reagent & indicator (Merck mini) & anaerobic jars (Merck)

    All plates were incubated at 37 C in a CO2 environment and examined at 72 hrs.

    For culture positive samples , smear & aero tolerance was performed

    Aero tolerance negative cultures were put for identification using the anaerobic (ANC) cards on Vitek 2 Compact

    Susceptibility testing were performed using standard methods using Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) methods

  • Results & Discussion

    Total of 91 specimens were received and processed

    50 bile

    36 swab from gall bladder

    5 pus

    Study group : 46 M, 45 F

    Mean age : 56.1 yrs.

  • Results & Discussion

    Overall, 42% (38/91) specimens were culture positive

    73% (28/71) specimens were monomicrobial

    27% (10/38) specimens had >=2 organisms

    Isolates

    47 aerobic organisms & 2 anaerobic organisms

    Anaerobes in 2 pts. Prevotella & Bacteroides sp.

  • Gram negative bacilli (N=35)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    E.coli Klebsiella Enterobacter Kluyvera Serratia

  • % Susceptibility of Gram Negative Bacilli

    21

    35

    59

    38

    50

    68

    56

    29

    76

    74

    79

    94

    82

    68

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Ampicillin

    Cefuroxime

    Cefipime

    Ceftriaxone

    Amox+ Clav

    Cefo+ Sulbactum

    Pip+Tazo

    Ciprofloxacin

    Gentamicin

    Amikacin

    Ertapenam

    Imipenam

    Meropenam

    Tigecyline

    Options for Empiric therapy: Amoxicillin clavulanic acid Gentamicin Piperacillin Tazobactam

  • Gram Positive Cocci (n= 12)

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    Nu

    mb

    ers

    of

    iso

    late

    s

  • % Susceptibility of Gram Positive Cocci

    0

    0

    0

    50

    80

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    50

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    Ampicillin

    Amox+ Clav

    Ceftriaxone

    Ciprofloxacin

    Gentamicin

    Linezolid

    Tecioplanin

    Vancomycin

    Tigecycline

    Streptococci

    Enterococci

  • Results & Discussion

    Clinical diagnosis Nos. AMA (%)

    Culture positivity

    (%)

    Reference

    Acute Calculous cholecystitis 56 75 41 32% MR Capoor 2008, Braz J

    Infect Dis

    Chronic Calculous cholecystitis 13 14 46

    Asymptomatic cholelithiasis 10 0 0

    With Gangrenous cholecystitis 5 50 80

    Associated CBD calculus 3 0 66 52% MR Capoor 2008, Braz J

    Infect Dis

    With Perforation of GB* 2 100 100

    Acalculous cholecystitis 1 0 0

    Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis

    1 100 100

  • Risk Stratification

    Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 E.g.

    Health Care Contact No Yes Prolonged Hospitalization

    Procedures No Minimum

    Major invasive Procedures

    Invasive bilary procedures,

    stenting

    Antibiotic Rx History Patients

    No in last 90 days No in last 90 days Repeat multiple

    antibiotics Oral or IV

    Characteristics Young No co-

    morbid conditions.

    Elderly Few Co-morbid

    conditions

    Immunocompromised, or with many co-morbid conditions

    DM,CKD, immunosuppre

    ssion

    Causative Pathogen could be

    Susceptible to Common narrow

    spectrum antibiotics

    ESBLs ESBLs / NDM/ VRE

    /MRSA

    Carmelli Score A.Salvovici et al Therapeutics, Pharmacology & Clinical Toxicology 2009

  • Limitations of the study

    Sample small size

    Swabs from gall bladder

    Anaerobes specific media

  • For different pathologies: different rates of bactobilia

    Empiric antibiotic : risk stratification

    Gram negatives were commonly isolated followed by gram positive and anaerobes.

    60% of GNB were ESBL. 20% were Carbapenamase producers

    Empiric antibiotic : Local susceptibility pattern

    Among Gram positive, Enterococcus outnumbered Streptococci

    Empiric antibiotic : common organism associated with disease

  • Antimicrobial Stewardship Policy

    For prophylaxis : Cefazolin/Cefuroxime/Aminoglycosides (single dose)

    For empiric therapy:

    o Gentamicin o Piperacillin Tazobactam o Amoxicillin clavulanic acid and gentamicin

    For de-escalation/targeted therapy:

    Based on culture results

    Carbapenems should be reserved for critically ill patients

    Fluroquinolones no role to play in treatment of biliary pathology