Emaar MGF Land Limited - Red Herring Prospectus · 2018. 8. 16. · Emaar group Emaar and companies...

641

2. If the Company fails to pay the debenture coupon for an interest period on its due date, interest accrues on such unpaid sum from the due date up to the date of actual payment at a rate which is 2% p.a. in addition to the debenture coupon.

3. The FCDs are convertible into RPS on the respective conversion dates or upon demand by the

Subscriber upon or after the occurrence of a specified event of default. 4. The FCDs are to be converted into such number of RPS such that the Subscriber receives RPS with

an aggregate nominal value equal to the respective Issuance Amount and the conversion premium for such FCDs. The conversion premium for (i) Series 1 FCDs is an amount equal to 20.23% of the Series 1 Issuance Amount, (ii) Series 2 FCDs is an amount equal to 20.56% of the Series 2 Issuance Amount, and (iii) Series 3 FCDs is an amount equal to 20.56% of the Series 3 Issuance Amount.

5. Upon conversion of the FCDs on demand of the Subscriber upon or after the occurrence of an

event of default, the Subscriber is entitled to receive the RPS, with an aggregate value equivalent to the respective Issuance Amounts and an amount sufficient to yield to the Subscriber a specified annual rate of return (the “Rate of Return”). The Rate of Return with respect to (i) Series 1 FCDs is 8.65% on the Series 1 Issuance Amount, (ii) Series 2 FCDs is 8.80% on the Series 2 Issuance Amount, and (iii) Series 3 FCDs is 8.80% on the Series 3 Issuance Amount, calculated on the actual number of days elapsed from the date of completion until the date of conversion. In addition, the Subscriber is also entitled to receive a default interest of 2% p.a. calculated on the actual number of days elapsed from the date of completion until the date of conversion.

6. The FCDs are non-marketable, i.e., not capable of being sold on a recognised stock exchange in

India or the United Kingdom. However, the FCDs may be transferred or assigned by the holder of the FCDs with the prior approval of the Company.

7. The holder of FCDs may require that the FCDs be redeemed at the “debenture redemption price”

upon the occurrence of a specified event of default. The “debenture redemption price” is an amount (to be paid in US$) equal to the sum of (i) the respective Issuance Amounts and (ii) the specified Rate of Return for such FCDs, and reduced by any debenture coupon amount received by the holder in respect of the FCDs so redeemed.

Characteristics of RPS

The key terms of the RPS are set forth below:

1. The holders of RPS are entitled to preferential dividend of 9% p.a. payable on the RPS for the period commencing on and including the date of conversion up to and including the date of redemption of the RPS.

2. The Subscriber is entitled to redeem the RPS at the debenture redemption price on the specified

RPS redemption date or upon the occurrence of an event of default. The Company is required to redeem the RPS at their face value together with all accrued and unpaid dividends. If the Company fails to redeem the RPS at the debenture redemption price on the due date, interest will accrue on such unpaid sum from the due date up to the actual date of payment at a rate of 2% p.a. in addition to the RPS dividend.

3. The RPS may be transferred or assigned by the holders of RPS with the prior approval of the

Company. 4. The holders of RPS are entitled to vote together with the other preference shareholders on any

question upon which the holders of preference shares have a right to vote. Issue of Debentures to Citibank International Plc aggregating US$150 million Pursuant to a Subscription Agreement dated April 20, 2007 (the “Citibank Agreement”), the Company in April 2007 issued 62,955 fully convertible debentures to Citibank International Plc, a company incorporated under the laws of United Kingdom (“Citibank”), for an aggregate consideration of Rs.6,295.5 million, which was the rupee equivalent of US$150 million (the “Issuance Amount” and such debentures, the “Citibank FCDs”). The Citibank FCDs are convertible into redeemable cumulative preference shares of the Company (the “Citibank RPS”).

642

The key terms of the Citibank Agreement are set forth below: 1. Under the Citibank Agreement, the Company has undertaken to use the Issuance Amount only

towards general corporate purposes and projects which are in compliance with the applicable law. 2. The Company has agreed to bear all taxes levied in connection with the Citibank FCDs, Citibank

RPS and the Citibank Agreement. 3. Prepayments of principal amounts are not permitted under the Citibank FCDs or the Citibank RPS. 4. The Company has agreed to indemnify Citibank and its officers, employees, directors and agents

harmless from and against any and all direct and actual losses that may be suffered by such party in connection with any material misrepresentation, breach of any warranties or covenants made by the Company.

5. At any time prior to the conversion of all the Citibank FCDs and prior to the redemption of all the

Citibank RPS, the Company has agreed to supply certain information to the Subscriber, including notifying the Subscriber, on a quarterly basis, of any new projects commenced, or diversification, modernisation or substantial expansion of any of the Company’s existing projects and providing the audited consolidated and unconsolidated annual accounts and unaudited consolidated and unconsolidated accounts of the Company.

6. Under the Citibank Agreement, the Company has, inter alia, covenanted as follows:

i. The Company will not, without the prior written consent of Citibank, (i) enter into any amalgamation, demerger, merger or corporate reconstruction; (ii) change the general nature or scope of its business; (iii) enter into any contract or agreement with, whether or not in the ordinary course of business, any affiliates, related party or group companies, other than on a commercial basis and on terms no less favourable to the Company than those that the Company would have obtained had the Company entered into any contract or agreement with any other party; (iv) declare or pay any dividend or other distribution on any class of its shares, except for any existing redeemable cumulative preference shares of the Company or any preference shares issued by the Company; or (v) reduce, return, purchase, repay, cancel or redeem any of its share capital, except for the redemption of any existing redeemable cumulative preference shares of the Company or the Citibank RPS.

ii. The Company will ensure that the ratio of total debt to net worth at the end of two financial quarters will not be greater than 1.3:1.

7. Certain events constitute events of default under the Citibank Agreement, including if the

Company commits any default under any other loan agreement, provided that the aggregate value of such default is at least Rs.500 million.

8. The Citibank Agreement terminate inter alia upon the conversion of all the Citibank FCDs into

Citibank RPS or redemption of the Citibank FCDs, and if the Citibank FCDs are converted into Citibank RPS, upon the final and irrevocable redemption of all the Citibank RPS.

9. The Company is not permitted to cancel or redeem the Citibank FCDs or the Citibank RPS, as the

case may be, without the consent of Citibank. Characteristics of the Citibank FCDs

The key terms of the Citibank FCDs are set forth below: 1. The holder of Citibank FCDs are entitled to a coupon payment of 13.48% p.a. on the Citibank

FCDs for each interest period (i.e., a period of six months), until the conversion date or redemption in full of the Citibank FCDs, in accordance with the terms of the Citibank Agreement.

2. If the Company fails to pay the debenture coupon for an interest period on its due date, interest

accrues on such unpaid sum from the due date up to the date of actual payment at a rate which is 2% p.a. in addition to the debenture coupon.

643

3. The Citibank FCDs are non-marketable, i.e., not capable of being sold on a recognised stock exchange in India or the United Kingdom. However, the Citibank FCDs may be transferred or assigned by the holder of the Citibank FCDs with the prior approval of the Company.

4. The Citibank FCDs are convertible into Citibank RPS on the conversion date or upon demand by

Citibank upon or after the occurrence of a specified event of default. 5. The Citibank FCDs are to be converted into such number of Citibank RPS such that Citibank

receives Citibank RPS with an aggregate nominal value equal to the Issuance Amount. If the conversion take place prior to the expiry of 38 months from the date of completion upon demand by Citibank upon or after the occurrence of a specified event of default, Citibank is entitled to receive Citibank RPS with an aggregate nominal value equal to (i) the Issuance Amount, (ii) an amount sufficient to yield to Citibank an annual rate of return of 13.48% on the Issuance Amount, calculated on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed from the date of completion until the date of conversion (“Rate of Return”), and (iii) a default interest of 2% p.a. calculated on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed from the date of completion until the date of conversion.

6. The holder of Citibank FCDs may require that the Citibank FCDs be redeemed at the “debenture

redemption price” upon the occurrence of a specified event of default. The “debenture redemption price” is an amount (to be paid in US$) equal to the sum of (i) the Issuance Amount and (ii) the specified Rate of Return for such Citibank FCDs, and reduced by any debenture coupon amount received by the holder in respect of the Citibank FCDs so redeemed.

Characteristics of Citibank RPS

The key terms of the Citibank RPS are set forth below:

1. The holders of Citibank RPS are entitled to preferential dividend of 13.48% p.a. payable on the Citibank RPS for the period commencing on and including the date of conversion up to and including the date of redemption of the Citibank RPS.

2. Citibank is entitled to redeem the Citibank RPS at the debenture redemption price on the specified

Citibank RPS redemption date or upon the occurrence of an event of default. The Company is required to redeem the Citibank RPS at their face value together with all accrued and unpaid dividends. If the Company fails to redeem the Citibank RPS at the debenture redemption price on the due date, interest will accrue on such unpaid sum from the due date up to the actual date of payment at a rate of 2% p.a. in addition to the Citibank RPS dividend.

3. The Citibank RPS may be transferred or assigned by the holders of Citibank RPS with the prior

approval of the Company. 4. The holders of Citibank RPS are entitled to vote together with the other preference shareholders on

any question upon which the holders of preference shares have a right to vote. Issue of Debentures to Prudential ICICI Trust Limited A/c Liquid Plan aggregating Rs.2,500 million On June 27, 2007, the Company issued 2,500 secured, redeemable non-convertible debentures of Rs.1,000,000 each (“NCDs”) to Prudential ICICI Trust Limited A/c Liquid Plan (“Prudential ICICI”) for an aggregate consideration of Rs.2,500 million, the details of which are set forth below:

Series

Sub-category

Number of Debentures

Debenture Amount (Rs. in million)

Redemption Date

I A 250 250 September 25, 2007 II B 400 400 December 25, 2007 III C 500 500 March 21, 2008 IV D 1,350 1,350 June 24, 2008

Total 2,500

On September 25, 2007 and December 24, 2007, the Company repaid Rs.250 million and Rs.400 million respectively, towards principal repayment against the NCDs. Subsequent to such payment, the total principal amount outstanding on December 24, 2007 was Rs.1,850 million.

644

Pursuant to a Debenture Trust Deed dated June 27, 2007 between the Company and IL&FS Trust Company Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act (“IL&FS”), IL&FS was appointed to act as the trustee on behalf of Prudential ICICI. The key terms of the Debenture Trust Deed are set forth below: 1. The repayment of the NCDs on maturity, payment of all interest, costs, expenses and payments to

be made to IL&FS and all other payments to be made with respect to the NCDs are secured by a first mortgage and charge in favour of IL&FS over non-agricultural freehold land measuring 1,832.33 Sq. mt. located at Village Indrad, Taluka Kadi, District Mehsana, Gujarat, India, owned by the Company, and (ii) a first charge in favour of IL&FS over the Company’s share of receivables accrued from the Company’s projects – Mohali Hills (Sectors 108 and 109) located at Mohali, Punjab, India and The Palm Springs located at Gurgaon, Haryana, India (the “Receivables”) and the Company’s escrow account opened with the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (the “Escrow Account”). The land in Sectors 108 and 109 of the Mohali Hills project is covered by a negative lien (i.e., the Company has undertaken not to create any encumbrance or offer such land as security or mortgage for securing any debt or obligation).

2. The Company is required to pay interest on the outstanding amount of the face value of the Non

Convertible Debentures getting redeemed at the rate of 11.50% p.a. payable at each redemption. 3. Certain events constitute events of default under the Debenture Trust Deed, including if any

indebtedness of the Company becomes due prior to its maturity due to default of the terms thereof or any such indebtedness is not paid at maturity; if the Company enters into amalgamation, reorganization or reconstruction without prior written intimation to IL&FS; and if the Company makes changes to its Memorandum of Association or Articles of Association without the prior written consent of IL&FS.

4. Under the facility agreement, the Company has, inter alia, covenanted as follows:

i. The Company will deliver to IL&FS copies of audited accounts; ii. The Company will inform IL&FS of any changes in its name, composition of its Board of

Directors or conduct of its business; iii. The Company will maintain a debt-equity ratio of 1.3:1; iv. The Company will not, without the prior written consent of IL&FS, (i) declare or pay any

dividend during any financial year unless the Company has paid the instalment of principal and interest then due and payable on the NCDs; (ii) sell or dispose of the mortgaged properties in Gujarat or create any lien or charge or other encumbrance on such properties; or (iii) undertake or permit any merger, consolidation, reorganization or scheme of arrangement.

5. IL&FS has a right to appoint a nominee on the Board of Directors of the Company upon the

occurrence of an event of default relating to two consecutive interest payment periods. Such nominee director will need to be appointed on all key committees of the Board of Directors.

6. The Company is required to pay IL&FS a fixed acceptance fee and a specified annual fee. The Company has also entered into (i) a memorandum of hypothecation dated June 27, 2007, pursuant to which the Receivables and the Escrow Account have been hypothecated by way of first charge in favour of IL&FS as security of the NCDs, and (ii) an escrow agreement dated June 21, 2007 with IL&FS and the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, pursuant to which the Company and IL&FS have jointly opened the Escrow Account for deposit of the Receivables for repayment of the NCDs issued to Prudential ICICI. In June 2007, ICRA Limited, a credit rating agency, assigned a conditional A1+ (SO) rating to the NCDs with a taxable tax status. The Company has also received an A+ rating from CARE for long term debt programmes and a PR1+ rating from CARE for short term debt programmes In addition, the Company has also issued short term non-convertible debentures to certain mutual funds from time to time, which are redeemable by April 11, 2008. As of the date of the Red Herring Prospectus, the amount outstanding under such non-convertible debentures aggregated Rs.10,500

645

million, of which debentures amounting to Rs.250 have daily/put call options attached to them and are backed by overdraft lines available to the Company. Indebtedness Relating to the Subsidiaries/Companies Owned by EMGF: 1) An Agreement of Loan dated September 3, 2007 has been entered between Emaar MGF

Construction Private Limited, a Subsidiary of the Company, and the State Bank of India for Rs.4,500 million, including a term loan limit of Rs.1,500 million and bank guarantee limit of Rs.3,000 million. The interest rate payable on the term loan is 0.25% below the State Bank Advance Rate which is currently at 12.75% per annum, or interest charged by other project lenders, whichever is higher. The present effective rate is 12.50% per annum. For the bank guarantee, a margin of 10% of the guarantee amount has been stipulated by the lender. The term loan needs to be repaid in five equal quarterly instalments of Rs.300 million each, commencing on September 30, 2009. The bank guarantee is to be repaid forthwith on demand by the lender. The loan is secured, inter alia, by a first charge by way of assignment of the borrower’s development rights in respect of the Commonwealth Games Village Residential Project and a first charge by way of hypothecation on all the moveable assets of the borrower and a corporate guarantee of the Company.

2) Pursuant to a letter dated September 27, 2007, the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation has sanctioned a non fund-based facility of Rs.500 million to Emaar MGF Construction Private Limited, a Subsidiary of the Company, for the Commonwealth Games Residential Village Project. The facility is secured by a corporate guarantee of the Company. The facility is open ended with a tenor not exceeding 16 months. Any request for extension beyond this tenor will be permitted only on providing a cash collateral to the lender.

3) An Agreement of Loan dated December 11, 2007 has been entered between Emaar MGF Construction Private Limited, a Subsidiary of the Company, and the State Bank of Patiala, together with sanction/arrangement letters dated November 5, 2007 and November 13, 2007, for Rs.1,000 million, including a term loan limit of Rs.500 million and bank guarantee limit of Rs.500 million. The interest rate payable on the outstanding in the borrower’s account is 0.50% below the Bank Prime Lending Rate which is currently at 13.00% per annum, or the interest rate charged by other project lenders, whichever is higher. The present effective rate is 12.50% per annum. The term loan is repayable in five equal quarterly instalments. The loan is secured by a first charge by way of assignment of the borrower’s development rights in respect of the Commonwealth Games Residential Project, a first charge by way of hypothecation on all the moveable assets of the borrower and a corporate guarantee of the Company, a first charge on all bank accounts of the project and a first charge/assignment/security interest on the borrower’s right under the project documents, contracts and all insurance policies in respect of the project.

4) Accession Buildwell Private Limited (“Accession”), a Company Owned by EMGF, has issued 1200 non-cumulative fully and compulsorily convertible non-participating preference shares of face value of Rs.10 each bearing 0% dividend at par value and 9,235,434 fully paid up non-marketable and unsecured Indian rupees denominated mandatorily convertible debentures of face value of Rs.640 to Black Lead Trading Limited (“Black Lead”), a company incorporated under the laws of Cyprus, pursuant to a Subscription Agreement Relating to INR Denominated Debentures Due 2012 dated December 14, 2007 (the “Subscription Agreement”).

Black Lead, the Company and Credit Suisse-Singapore Branch have also entered into a Put and Call Option Deed dated December 14, 2007 in respect of the Subscription Agreement, pursuant to which:

• The Company has irrevocably granted Black Lead an option to sell, at any time until June 3, 2011 and upon the occurrence of certain specified put events, (i) the debentures issued to it under the Subscription Agreement, (ii) any equity shares in Accession held and acquired by Black Lead from time to time pursuant to the conversion of any debentures, and (iii) the preference shares issued to it under the Subscription Agreement and the Company has undertaken to purchase such securities from Black Lead.

• In the event that a put event has occurred and Black Lead does not exercise its put option within certain specified period, the Company has the option to purchase such securities and Black Lead has undertaken to sell such securities to the Company.

646

• If, at any time after the conversion of the debentures into equity shares of Accession (the “Conversion Shares”), Black Lead wishes to accept a bona fide offer in cash for all of the Conversion Shares from a third party purchaser, Black Lead will be entitled to require the Company to sell all of its shares in Accession to the third party purchaser and the Company will be required to transfer such shares to the third party purchaser.

• If at any time after the conversion of the debentures into Conversion Shares, Black Lead, Accession or the Company or its Subsidiaries wish to accept a bona fide offer in cash for certain specified real property that forms part of the specified project land from a third party purchaser, Black Lead will be entitled to require the Company to procure that its affiliates sell such remaining part of the project to the third party purchaser.

Certain other ancillary agreements have also been executed pursuant to the Subscription Agreement, including the following:

(i) A Property Custody Agreement dated December 14, 2007 among Accession, the Company, Credit Suisse - Singapore Branch, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, Active Promoters Private Limited and certain Subsidiaries and/or Companies Owned by EMGF. Under this agreement, Accession is obligated to deposit title deeds in respect of certain property with IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, and not to encumber any such property.

(ii) An Agency Agreement dated December 14, 2007 between Accession and Credit Suisse - Singapore Branch, appointing Credit Suisse as an agent of Accession in respect of certain activities to be performed in relation to the Subscription Agreement and certain ancillary agreements.

(iii) A Share Certificates Safekeep Agreement among Accession, the Company, Credit Suisse - Singapore Branch, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, Active Promoters Private Limited and certain Subsidiaries and Companies Owned by EMGF. Under this agreement, the parties have agreed to deposit the share certificates of Accession held by Active Promoters Private Limited and the share certificates of certain Subsidiaries and/or Companies Owned by EMGF held by Accession with IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited and not to create any encumbrance on such shares.

647

SECTION VI: LEGAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

OUTSTANDING LITIGATION AND MATERIAL DEVELOPMENTS

Except as stated below there is no outstanding litigation, suits, criminal or civil prosecutions, proceedings or tax liabilities against the Company, the Subsidiaries, the Companies Owned by EMGF and the Joint Venture, and there are no material defaults, non payment of statutory dues, over-dues to banks or financial institutions, defaults against banks or financial institutions, defaults in dues payable to holders of any debenture, bonds or fixed deposits or arrears of preference shares issued by the Company, the Subsidiaries, the Companies Owned by EMGF and the Joint Venture, defaults in creation of full security as per terms of issue/other liabilities, proceedings initiated for economic, civil or any other offences (including past cases where penalties may or may not have been awarded and irrespective of whether they are specified under paragraph (I) of Part 1 of Schedule XIII of the Companies Act) other than unclaimed liabilities of the Company, the Subsidiaries, the Companies Owned by EMGF and the Joint Venture and no disciplinary action has been taken by SEBI or any stock exchanges against the Company, the Subsidiaries, the Companies Owned by EMGF the Joint Venture, the Promoters or the Directors, that may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, nor, so far as we are aware, are there any such proceedings pending or threatened. Except as disclosed below, there is no litigation involving the Company, the Subsidiaries, the Companies Owned by EMGF and the Joint Venture, after the date of the SEBI observation letter dated January 7, 2008. Neither the Company nor Subsidiaries, the Companies Owned by EMGF, the Joint Venture, the Promoters, the Promoter Group and the Directors have been declared as wilful defaulters by the Reserve Bank of India or any other Governmental authority and, as disclosed in this section in relation to litigation, there are no violations of securities laws committed by them in the past or are pending against them. Contingent liabilities of the Company as of September 30, 2007: As of September 30, 2007, contingent liabilities not provided for in the Company’s restated consolidated financial statements aggregated Rs.7,027.60 million and capital commitments (net of advances) aggregated Rs.841.40 million. For further information, see the restated consolidated financial statements of the Company as of September 30, 2007, beginning on page 509 of this Red Herring Prospectus. Outstanding Litigation and Material Developments/Proceedings against the Company, the Subsidiaries, the Companies Owned by EMGF and the Joint Venture

Cases against the Company

S. No.

Appeal No./ Case No.

Dated

Plaintiff/ Petitioners/

Complainant/ Applicant

Defendant/ Respondent

Name & Address of the

Court/ Arbitration

Panel

Amount Under Consideration (Rs.)

Brief Description of Case

Status

1. CWP No.

13248/07 August 2007

Samarth Raj Mehta and Ajay Bakshi

Company, State of Punjab and others

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Not applicable Writ Petition challenging exemption granted under Section 44 (2) of the Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation, 1995, as ultra vires and invalid, and praying for quashing of Notification no. 18/41/2006-II/7392 dated August 11, 2006 and Notification no. 18/41/2006-5HG-II/12783 dated December 12, 2006. This petition is in respect of property situated at Mohali, sector-105

The next date of hearing is January 17, 2008

2. Suit No.1589/2007

June 15, 2007

Balwant Singh Company and others

Civil Judge Senior Division, Mohali

Not available

Suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from

The next date of hearing is February 13,

648

S. No.


Dated




Name & Address of the

Court/ Arbitration

Panel

Amount Under Consideration (Rs.)


Status

dispossessing the Plaintiffs from land measuring 122 kanals 6 marlas (15.287 acres) mentioned in Notification No. 1510/SYL/Const.80 under section 4 and Notification No. 1896-SYL/Const. under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act

2008

Cases by the Company (including appeals from adverse decisions)

S. No.

Appeal No./

Case No.

Dated




Name & Address of the Court/ Arbitration

Panel

Amount Under Consideration

(Rs.)


Status

1. CWP No.

3628/06 March 2006 Company,

Logical Developers Private Limited, MGF Developments Limited and others

State of Haryana and others


Not available Writ Petition for, inter alia, quashing of Notification No. 32/7/2004-4IB I dated September 17, 2004 and Notification No. 32/7/2004-4IB I dated October 27, 2004 for the acquisition of certain land measuring 42.19 acres situated at the revenue estates of Villages Lakhnaula and Naurangpur in Tehsil and District Gurgaon, Haryana

The next date of hearing is yet to be notified

2. CWP No. 3554/06

March 2006 Company, Zonex Estates Private Limited, MGF Developments Limited and others



Not available Writ Petition for, inter alia, quashing of Notification No. 32/7/2004-4IB I dated September 17, 2004 and Notification No. 32/7/2004-4IB I dated October 27, 2004 for the acquisition of certain land measuring 105 kanals 17 marlas (13.231 acres) situated at the revenue estates of Villages Lakhnaula and Naurangpur in Tehsil and District Gurgaon, Haryana


3. CWP No. 3654/06

March 2006 Company, Sonex Projects Private Limited, Gyan Kunj Constructions Private Limited, Gyan Jyoti Estates Private Limited, Amar Deep Buildcon Private Limited, Rose Gate Estates Private Limited, MGF Development Limited and





649

S. No.

Appeal No./

Case No.

Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

others

4. CWP No. 3859/06

March 2006 Company, Sarvodya Buildcon Private Limited, Prosperous Constructions Private Limited and MGF Developments Limited





5. CWP No. 5298/06

April 2006 Company, Logical Developers Private Limited, Zonex Estates Private Limited, Yukti Projects Private Limited, Sankalp Promoters Private Limited, MGF Developments Limited and others



Not available

Writ Petition for, inter alia, quashing of Notification No. 32/36/2005-4IB I dated September 27, 2005 for the acquisition of certain land measuring 7.99 acres situated at the revenue estates of Villages Bas Kusla and Bas Haria in Tehsil and District Gurgaon, Haryana


6. CWP No. 9748/06 and Review Petition of 2007

July 2007 Company, Paramjeet Singh, Logical Estates Private Limited, Snow White Buildcon Private Limited, Active Promoters Private Limited, Logical Developers Private Limited and Legend Buildcon Private Limited and MGF Developments Limited

State of Punjab and others

High Court of Punjab and Haryana

Not available Writ Petition for, inter alia, quashing of Notification No. 6/45/2004-1HG1/2622 dated March 21, 2005 and Declaration No. 6/45/2004-1HG1/2030 dated March 13, 2006 for the acquisition of certain land measuring 27.22 acres situated at the revenue estates of Village Landran, Tehsil Mohali, District Rup Nagar, Punjab

The next date of hearing is January 29, 2008. A review petition was filed against order dated May 4, 2007 and has since been allowed and listed for hearing

7. CWP No. 9746/06 and Review Petition of 2007

July 2007 Company, Legend Buildcon Private Limited, MGF Developments Limited and others

State of Punjab and others


Not available Writ Petition for, inter alia, quashing of Notification No. 6/45/2004-1HG1/2620 dated March 21, 2005 and Declaration No. 6/45/2004-1HS1/2026 dated March 13, 2006 for the acquisition of certain land measuring 49 kanals 3 1/3 marlas (6.333 acres) situated at the revenue estates of Village Lakhnor, Tehsil Mohali, District Rup Nagar, Punjab

The next date of hearing is January 29, 2008. A review petition was filed against order dated May 4, 2007 and has since been allowed and listed for hearing

8. CWP 598/2007

January 2007 Company, MGF Developments

State of Rajasthan and

High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur

Not applicable Writ Petition challenging Notification

The next date of hearing is

650

S. No.

Appeal No./

Case No.

Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

Limited and Logical Developers Private Limited

others No. P.6 (28) UD (Na. Vi.)/3/2005 dated December 20, 2005 and Declaration No. P.6 (28) UD (Na. Vi.)/05 dated April 29, 2006 for the acquisition of certain land measuring 3.95 acres situated at the revenue estates of Village Bhamoria, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan

yet to be notified

9. S.B. C.W. No. 2533/ 2007

April 2007 Company, MGF Developments Limited and Active Promoters Private Limited

State of Rajasthan and others


Not applicable Writ Petition challenging Notification No. P.6 (28) UD (Na. Vi.)/3/2005 dated December 20, 2005 and Declaration No. P.6 (28) UD (Na. Vi.)/05 dated April 29, 2006 for the acquisition of certain land measuring 14.57 acres situated at the revenue estates of Village Bhamoria, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan


10. S.B. C.W. No. 2534/ 2007

April 2007 Company, MGF Developments Limited and Active Promoters Private Limited



Not applicable Writ Petition challenging Notification No. P.6 (28) UD (Na. Vi.)/3/2005 dated December 20, 2005 and Declaration No. P.6 (28) UD (Na. Vi.)/05 dated April 29, 2006 for the acquisition of certain land measuring 8.03 acres situated at the revenue estates of Village Jhai, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan


11. S.B. C.W. No. 2535/ 2007

April 2007 Company, Dove Promoters Private Limited and MGF Developments Limited



Not applicable Writ Petition challenging Notification No. P.6 (28) UD (Na. Vi.)/3/2005 dated December 20, 2005 and Declaration No. P.6 (28) UD (Na. Vi.)/05 dated April 29, 2006 for the acquisition of certain land measuring 2.45 acres situated at the revenue estates of Village Jhai, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan


12. C.C. No. 615/07

March 17, 2007

Company Shirish Shukla and others

Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House

Not applicable A first information report has been registered with respect to complaint No. 615/07

The next date of hearing is March 3, 2008

651

Notices received/sent by the Company, Subsidiaries, Companies Owned by EMGF and the Joint Venture

S. No.

Name of the Party Receiving the Legal

Notice

Name of the Party Issuing the Legal Notice

Date of Notice


Description of the Legal Notice

Status

1. Sewak Developers Private Limited

Pale Ram November 9, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Sewak Developers Private Limited was informed that as they have not complied with their obligations under the agreement to sell, the agreement is cancelled and the earnest money paid is forfeited

No reply has been sent as the Company is in discussion with the issuing party

2. Capex Project Private Limited

Bhup Singh, Narendar and Nand Kishore

December 6, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on December 14, 2006 for the execution and registration of the sale deed together with the payment of the balance amount of sale consideration failing which Rs.9,000,000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and agreement to sell would be cancelled



Pehlad, Raghbir, Rajendar, Surender, Sukhdev, Kulbir, Kartari Devi, and Sunil

December 6, 2006




Ram Chander December 6, 2006




Ram Rati, Jai Bhagwan and Sandeep.

December 6, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on December 14, 2006 for the execution and registration of the sale deed together with the payment of the balance amount of sale consideration failing which Rs.600,000 paid as earnest money would be


652

S. No.


Notice


Date of Notice



Status

forfeited and agreement to sell would be cancelled


Pehlad, Raghbir, Rajendar, Surender, Sikhdev, Kulbir, Kartari Devi and Sunil

December 6, 2006




Rajesh Kumar, Sudhir Kumar and Vijay

December 6, 2006




Rajender, Rajesh, Virbhan, Satbir, Santosh and Krishan

December 6, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on December 14, 2006 for the execution and registration of the sale deed together with the payment of the balance amount of sale consideration failing which earnest money would be forfeited and agreement to sell would be cancelled



Ramesh, Kuldeep, Pardeep and Manoj Satbir

December 6, 2006




Ran Singh, Jogender, and Khushal

December 6, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on December 14, 2006 for the execution and registration of the sale deed together


653

S. No.


Notice


Date of Notice



Status

with the payment of the balance amount of sale consideration failing which Rs.6,000,000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and agreement to sell would be cancelled


Manjeet Singh and Mahabir-Azad

December 6, 2006




Jagpal December 6, 2006




Rattan Singh and Bhim Singh

December 6, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on December 14, 2006 for the execution and registration of the sale deed together with the payment of the balance amount of sale consideration failing which Rs.6,000,000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and agreement to sell dated July 24, 2006 would be cancelled



Biro Devi and Rinku

December 6, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on December 14, 2006 for the execution and registration of the sale deed together with the payment of the balance amount of sale consideration failing which Rs.6,000,000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and agreement to sell dated July 24, 2006 would be cancelled


654

S. No.


Notice


Date of Notice



Status


Manjeet Singh and Mahabir-Azad

December 6, 2006




Mukhtiyar Singh, Satpal, Inderjeet, Harish Chand,

Raj Pal and Sumit

December 6, 2006

Not available

Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on October 23, 2006 for the execution and registration of the sale deed together with the payment of the balance amount of sale consideration failing which Rs.6,000,000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and agreement to sell dated July 12, 2006 would be cancelled


17. Camarederie Properties Private Limited

Gyaneshwar Realtors Private Limited

July 21, 2006 Not available Through this legal notice, Camarederie Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on July 24, 2006 for the execution and registration of the sale deed together with the payment of the balance amount of sale consideration failing which Rs.5,100,000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and agreement to sell dated June 22, 2006 would be cancelled



Babita Devi August 1, 2006 Not available Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on July 20, 2006 for the execution of the sale deed failing which the earnest money paid has been forfeited and agreement to sell is cancelled


19. Nayas Projects Private Limited

Munshi Ram August 30, 2006 Not available Through this legal notice, Nayas Project Private Limited was granted an extension to execute and register a sale deed within 10 days from the receipt of the notice failing which Rs.1,340,0000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and the agreement to sell would


655

S. No.


Notice


Date of Notice



Status

be cancelled


Kanwal Singh,

Satbir Singh and Balwan Singh

August 30, 2006 Not available Through this legal notice, Nayas Project Private Limited was granted an extension to execute and register a sale deed within 10 days from the receipt of the notice failing which Rs.6,000,000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and the agreement to sell would be cancelled



Udai Singh August 31, 2006 Not available Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was granted an extension to execute and register a sale deed by September 15, 2006 failing which Rs.2,887,500 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and the agreement to sell would be cancelled


22. Maestro Estate Private Limited

Prabhu Ram September 1, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Maestro Estate Private Limited was informed that as they had failed to perform their obligations under the agreement to sell, Rs.1,700,000 paid as earnest money has been forfeited and the agreement to sell is cancelled


23. Capex Projects Private Limited

Kishori Lal and Radhey Shyam

September 8, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on September 25, 2006 for the execution and registration of the sale deed together with the payment of the balance amount of sale consideration failing which Rs.4,000,000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and agreement to sell dated July 24, 2006 would be cancelled


24. Maestro Estates Private Limited

Attar Singh September 8, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Maestro Estate Private Limited was informed that as they had failed to perform their obligations under the agreement to sell, Rs.200,000 paid as earnest money has been forfeited and the agreement to sell is cancelled


25. Tushar Projects Private Limited

Ram Bhateri, Satbir , Gopi, Kamlesh, Sumesh,

Hans Ram and Sarita

September 9, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Tushar Project Private Limited was granted an extension to execute and

No reply has been sent as the Company is in discussion with

656

S. No.


Notice


Date of Notice



Status

register a sale deed failing which Tushar Projects Private Limited would have been liable for any loss and damages suffered

the issuing party


Ghisa Ram,

Mangat Ram,

Dhan Kaur and

Lalwati

September 9, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Tushar Project Private Limited was granted an extension to execute and register a sale deed failing which Tushar Projects Private Limited would have been liable for any loss and damages suffered



Sarv Shri Roop Chand,

Krishan,

Kude Ram, Jaipal,

Ramrati and

Vimla

September 9, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Tushar Project Private Limited was granted an extension to execute and register a sale deed failing which Tushar Projects Private Limited would have been liable for any loss and damages suffered



Ram Phal and Bhram Prakash

September 11, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Nayas Projects Private Limited was informed that as they had failed to perform their obligations under the agreement to sell, Rs.2,000,000 paid as earnest money has been forfeited, Nayas Projects Private Limited is responsible for damages on account of delay and the agreement to sell is cancelled



Suresh, Ramesh, Mukesh, Joginder, Virender, Savita,

Sunita Devi, Arnesh Devi,

Bhatairi, Mukesh, Surinder Kumar, Chanderwati Mukesh Kumari and Vivek Kumari

September 13, 2006

Not available

Through this legal notice, Nayas Project Private Limited was granted an extension to execute and register a sale deed within 15 days from the receipt of the notice failing which earnest money would be forfeited and the agreement to sell would be cancelled


30. Hope Promoters Private Limited

Goverdhan Lal September 18, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice Hope Promoters Private Limited was granted an extension to execute and register a sale deed within one month from the receipt of the notice failing which Rs.5,250,000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and the agreement to sell would be cancelled


31. Tanmay Developers Private Limited

Nawal Singh September 19, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice Tanmay Developers Private Limited was informed that as they have not performed their obligations under the agreement to sell dated August 4, 2006,


657

S. No.


Notice


Date of Notice



Status

Rs.1,400,000 paid as earnest money has been forfeited and the seller has executed a purchase agreement with a third party

32. Hope Promoters Private Limited and Garland Estate Private Limited

Balbiro September 20, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice Hope Promoters Private Limited and Garland Estate Private Limited has been restrained from alienating land measuring 3 kanals (0.37 acres) situated at Village Daultabad, Gurgaon as the above referred land is subject to the litigation pending before the Civil Judge, Gurgaon in the case of Balbiro v. Krishan and others


33. Brijbasi Projects Private Limited

Jaswant Ram and Ishwar Das

October 5, 2006 Not available Through this legal notice, Brijbasi Projects Private Limited was informed that as they had failed to perform their obligations under the agreement to sell, Rs.10,451,250 paid as earnest money has been forfeited and the agreement to sell is cancelled



Madan Lal




Kushal Chand




Karam Chand

October 5, 2006

Not available Through this legal notice, Brijbasi Projects Private Limited was informed that as they had failed to perform their obligations under the agreement to sell, Rs.10,530,000 paid as earnest money has been forfeited and the agreement to sell is cancelled


658

S. No.


Notice


Date of Notice



Status


Inderjeet, Anil Kumar;

Mukesh Kumar, Anita,

Kashmiri and

Satbir

October 6, 2006 Not available Through the notice, Capex Projects Private Limited was called upon to get the execution and registration of the sale deed on or before October 23, 2006 failing which the earnest money would be forfeited and Agreement would be cancelled.



Rajinder Singh, Suresh Kumar, Tejpal, Dayanand, Mahender Singh and Naresh Kumar

October 6, 2006 Not available Through this legal notice, Capex Project Private Limited was required to be present at the offices of the sub-registrar on October 23, 2006 for the execution and registration of the sale deed together with the payment of the balance amount of sale consideration failing which Rs.3,550,000 paid as earnest money would be forfeited and agreement to sell dated July 12, 2006 would be cancelled


39. Kamdhenu Project Private Limited

Chameli Devi, Anup Singh, Mahendar Kaur, Savita and Savitri

November 9, 2006

Not available Through this notice, Kamdhenu Project Private Limited was informed that as they had failed to perform their obligations under the agreement to sell, Rs.12,600,000 paid as earnest money has been forfeited and the agreement to sell is cancelled


40. Kamdhenu Project Private Limited

Shiv Ram November 9, 2006

Not available Through this notice, Kamdhenu Project Private Limited was informed that as they had failed to perform their obligations under the agreement to sell, Rs.12,500,000 paid as earnest money has been forfeited and the agreement to sell is cancelled


41. Company Office of the Controller of Legal Metrology, Government of N.C.T. of Delhi

September 26, 2007

2,000 Through this notice, Emaar MGF Land Limited was required to pay Rs.2,000 as fine for an advertisement published in a newspaper using non-standard units for measurements

Company has paid the fine

Tax Cases involving the Company

On September 12, 2007, we were subjected to search and seizure operations under section 132 and surveys under section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The search and seizure operations were conducted in 17 locations of the Company, certain executive Directors and employees of the Company and certain Promoters, Promoter Group Companies, relatives of the Promoter and employees of the Promoter Group Companies. During the course of the search and seizure operations, the income tax authorities have taken custody of certain materials such as documents, records, computer files and hardware, and recorded statements of certain officials of these entities. Subsequently, the income tax authorities have sought further information/documents and explanations from time to time. We have

659

cooperated with the authorities in this regard. However, we have not received any demand notice so far from the income tax authorities in connection with these search and seizure operations. Pending completion of these proceedings, tax liability if any that may arise on this account, is presently unascertainable and will be determined upon conclusion of the proceedings. Proceedings initiated against the Company for economic offences

Nil Details of past penalties imposed on the Company

Nil Cases against the Subsidiaries, the Companies Owned by EMGF and the Joint Venture

S. No.


Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

1. Suit No.

131/06 March 2006

Sarla Devi Bimla Devi, Kamla, Shakuntla, Urmils, Parmila, Vikram, Logical Developers Private Limited and Prosperous Buildcon Private Limited

Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gurgaon

Not available Suit for declaration restraining sale of land pursuant to a sale deed dated February 23, 2006 for a part of the total land measuring 25 bighas 12 biswas (16.00 acres) situated at Village Basai, Gurgaon for a total consideration of Rs.6,328,125. This suit is in respect of certain land measuring 2 bighas 5 biswas (1.40 acres) situated at Village Basai, Gurgaon


2. Suit No. 181/06

April 2006

Shine Buildcon Private Limited

Logical Developers Private Limited and Sartaj Singh


Not available Suit for declaration and permanent mandatory injunction restraining sale of land pursuant to a sale deed dated April 25, 2005 for a total consideration of Rs.42,933,750. This suit is in respect of certain land measuring 3646/48700 share of 542 kanals 17 marlas (67.85 acres) situated at Village Bas Hariya, Gurgaon


3. Suit No. 252/06

April 2006

Shine Buildcon Private Limited

Braham Singh, Bharat Singh, Logical Developers Private Limited and Raju


Not available Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction restraining sale of land pursuant to a sale deed dated April 25, 2005. This suit is in respect of certain land measuring 35 kanals 6 marlas (4.41 acres) situated at Village Bas Hariya, Gurgaon


4. Suit No. 259/05

October 2005

Assotech Realty Private Limited

Active Promoters Private Limited and Randhir Singh


13,000,000 with an interest of 12% from the date of filing the suit till realisation of the amount

Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction restraining performance of sale deed dated February 2, 2006. This suit is in respect of certain land measuring 8 kanals (1.00 acre) situated at Village Ghata, Gurgaon

The next date of hearing is February 7, 2008

5. Suit No. 260/05

October 2005


Active Promoters Private Limited


14,462,500 with an interest of 12%

Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction

The next date of

660

S. No.


Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

and Randhir Singh

from the date of filing the suit till realisation of the amount

restraining performance of sale deed dated February 2, 2006. This suit is in respect of certain land measuring 8 kanals 18 marlas (1.11 acres) situated at Village Ghata, Gurgaon

hearing is February 7, 2008

6. Suit No. 261/2005

October 2005







7. Suit No. 262/2005

October 2005







8. Suit No. 258/05

October 2005




24,050,000 with interest of 12% from the date of filing of suit till realisation of the amount

Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction restraining performance of sale deed dated February 2, 2006. This suit is in respect of certain land measuring 14 kanals and 16 marlas (1.85 acres) situated at Village Ghata, Gurgaon


9. Suit No. 122/06

April 2006

Radha Enterprises

Changa Singh, Logical Developers Private Limited and Prosperous Buildcon Private Limited


Not available Suit for mandatory injunction restraining execution of a sale deed dated January 7, 2006 for a total consideration of Rs.9,450,000. This suit is in respect of certain land measuring 14 kanals (1.75 acres) situated at Village Bada, Gurgaon

The next date of hearing is May 22, 2008

10. Suit No. 121/06

April 2006

Radha Enterprises

Ganga, Logical Developers Private Limited and Prosperous Buildcon Private Limited


Not available Suit for mandatory injunction restraining execution of a sale deed dated January 7, 2006 for a total consideration of Rs.8,750,000. This suit is in respect of certain land measuring 27 kanals 19 marlas (3.49 acres) situated at Village Bada, Gurgaon


11. Suit No. 24/06

2006

Orient Craft Infrastructure Limited

Yukti Projects Private Limited and others

Tehsildar, Gurgaon Not applicable Suit for partition of land measuring 1931/3448 share of 43 kanals and 2 marlas (3.49 acres) situated at Village Bas Hariya, Gurgaon


661

S. No.


Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

12. Suit No. 34/06

2006 Orient Craft

Infrastructure Limited

Yukti Projects Private Limited and others

Tehsildar, Gurgaon

Not applicable Suit for partition of land measuring 528 kanals and 2 marlas (66.01 acres) situated at Village Bas Hariya, Gurgaon


13. Suit No. 537/06

December 2006

Satyavir Yadav, Suresh Singh and Naresh Garg

Active Promoters Private Limited and Roop Kumar Bansal

Civil Judge Senior Division, Gurgaon

Not available Suit for declaration that the Plaintiffs are the lawful owners of land measuring 32 kanals (4.00 acres) situated at Village Bahadurshah Pur, Tehsil and District Gurgaon, Haryana and declaration that sale deed dated October 19, 2005 is null, illegal and void


14. Suit No. 50/07 October 2005

Chanderpal Abhinav Projects Private Limited and Siria

Additional Civil Judge Senior division, Gurgaon

24,937,500 Suit for specific performance in respect of sale deed dated January 17, 2007 for a total consideration of Rs 24,937,500. An order dated February 11, 2006 injuncting the defendants from selling the property measuring 5 kanals 14 marlas (0.71 acres) had been passed by the Additional Civil Judge. The Plaintiff has filed an application for impleading Abhinav Projects Private Limited as a party in this matter. The Plaintiff has also filed a contempt application


15. Suit No. 45/2007

2007 Regal Greenland Private Limited

Tanmay Developers Private Limited

Additional Civil Judge Senior Division, Gurgaon

Not applicable Suit for partition of the land bearing rect.no.60, killa no.3/3[2-2], 4/2[1-14] l measuring 5 kanals 10 marlas (0.68 acres) situated at revenue estate of Ghata, Tehsil Sohna and District Gurgaon


16. Suit No. 154/07

2007

Sher Singh Bailiwick

Builders Private Limited


Not available Suit for declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to the outstanding amount of the sale consideration together with interest of 12% per annum from January 11, 2007 (date of the sale deed) until realisation of the amount. The suit is for land measuring 11 kanals 9 marlas (1.43 acres), situated at Village Nangli Umarpur, Tehsil and District Gurgaon


17. Suit No. 183/2005

September 24, 2005

Umrao Active Promoters Private Limited, Sushil and Bishan Singh


Not available Suit for declaration and permanent injunction restraining a sale deed dated June 9, 2005 for a total consideration of Rs.3,200,000. This suit is

The next date of hearing is April 7, 2008

662

S. No.


Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

in respect of land measuring 16 kanals (2.00 acres) in Village Bhore Kalan, Gurgaon

18. Not available

July 2007

Vidya Devi Kela Devi and Active Promoters Private Limited


Not available

Suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of a sale deed dated June 13, 2005. This suit is in respect of land measuring 21 kanals 15 marlas (2.71 acres) located at Village Bhora Kalan, Gurgaon


19. RCA 16/2007 May 2007

Shailendra Kumar and Sumit Kumar

Pragya Buildcon Private Limited and Samuel Kutty

District Judge, Delhi

19,789,063 Appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge, dated April 17, 2007 for setting aside the above referred judgment and remanding the case to the Trial Court. The appeal is for declaration that the Special Power of Attorney executed by the Appellants grandfather is not binding on them and an injunction restraining the respondents from dispossessing the appellants from the suit land


20. Case No. 113/2007-08

June 28, 2007

State Prosperous Buildcon Private Limited

Upper Collector (Finance and Revenue), Ghaziabad

1,017,500 Case filed under the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 in respect of land situated at Village Shahpur Bamheta, Pargana Dasna, Tehsil and District Ghaziabad

The matter has been fixed for orders

21. Case No. 114/2007-08

June 28, 2007





22. Case No. 93/2007-08

June 28, 2007





23. Case No. 126/2007-08

June 28, 2007

State

Rose Gate Estates Private Limited




24. Case No. 125/2007-08

June 28, 2007

State

Sonex Projects Private Limited

Upper Collector (Finance and Revenue),

1,327,500 Case filed under the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 in

The matter has been

663

S. No.


Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

Ghaziabad respect of land situated at

Village Shahpur Bamheta, Pargana Dasna, Tehsil and District Ghaziabad

fixed for orders

25. RT-535/2006 April 13, 2006

Harpreet Kaur Dove Promoters Private Limited and others

Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kharar

Not available Suit filed for declaration that the Plaintiff is the joint owner of property situated at Village Raipur Kalan, Mohali and declaration of sale deed dated November 21, 2005 in respect of 52 kanals and 5 marlas (6.53 acres) situated at Village Raipur Kalan, Mohali as null and void

The next date for hearing is April 2, 2008

26. Suit No. 1569/07

June 1, 2007

Amar Singh Charismatic Realtors Private Limited and others

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mohali

Not available Suit for declaration that the Notification Nos. 1510/SYL/ Const./88 dated March 24, 1988 and Notification No. 1896/SYL/Const./88 April 11, 1988 issued under Section 4 and Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act are null and void and suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienating and dispossessing the Plaintiffs from the land measuring 15.43 acres situated at Village Raipur Kalan, Mohali


27. Suit No. 1216/2006

July 15, 2006

Arihant Marbles Snow White Buildcon Private Limited and others

Additional Civil Judge, Kharar

Not available

Suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and running of the marble shop on the land measuring 1 acre situated at Village Landran, Mohali which has been taken on rent

The next date of hearing is April 3, 2008

28. Suit No. 745/2005

November 11, 2005

Jasbir Kaur and others

Gyan Jyoti Estates Private Limited, Mega City Builders Private Limited and others

Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mohali

Not available Suit for declaration and permanent injunction with respect to sale deeds dated October 19, 2007 and October 21, 2005 is illegal, null and void and declaration to the effect that plaintiffs are owners of some part of land situated in Village Raipur, Tehsil Mohali, District Ropar


29. Suit No. 92/2006

May 23, 2006

Guru Nanak Paper Mills Limited and Others

Logical Developers Private Limited

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kharar

Not available

Suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession of land measuring 38 kanals 16 marlas (4.85 acres) situated at Village Balongi, Mohali and


664

S. No.


Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

declaration that the token money of Rs.200,000 is null and void

30. Suit No. 337/2006

September 30, 2006

Jaswinder Pal Singh and others

Milky Way Realtors Private Limited and others

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ludhiana

Not available Suit for possession by way of injunction and specific performance of the agreement dated May 15, 2006 for a total consideration of Rs.5,200,000 per acre. This suit is in respect of land measuring 33 kanals and 50 square yards (4.12 acres) situated at Village Gahaur, Mulanpur, Ludhiana and declaration that sale deed dated July 3, 2006 is illegal, null and void


31. Suit No. 968/2006

August 28, 2006

Jaswinder Pal Singh and others

Milky Way Realtors Private Limited and others

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ludhiana

Not available Suit for possession by way of injunction and specific performance of the agreement dated May 17, 2005 for a total consideration of Rs.5,000,000 per acre. This suit is in respect of land measuring 33 kanals and 150 square yards (4.15 acres) situated at Village Gahaur, Mulanpur, Ludhiana and declaration that sale deed dated July 3, 2006 is illegal, null and void


32. CS(OS) No. 844/2006

July 18, 2007

Arvind Kumar

Prosperous Buildcon Private Limited, Logical Estates Private Limited and others

High Court of Delhi, New Delhi

4,200,000 Suit for specific performance based on agreement of sale dated September 25, 2005 in favour of the Plaintiff

Next date of hearing is March 25, 2008

33. Case No. 49/NT/07

2007

Saraswati Kunj Infrastructure Private Limited

Hope Promoters Private Limited and others

Additional Collector, First Class, Gurgaon

11,937,500 Suit for partition in respect of land measuring 36 kanals (4.00 acres) situated at Village Kherki Majra Dhankot, Tehsil and District Gurgaon


34. Not available 2007


Logical Developers Private Limited


5,290,300 Suit for partition in respect of land measuring 12 kanals 16.5 marlas (1.60 acres) situated at Village Kherki Majra Dhankot, Tehsil and District Gurgaon


35. Not available February 2007

Sunglow Overseas Private Limited

Legend Buildcon Private Limited, Logical Developers Private Limited and others


3,356,250 Suit for partition in respect of land measuring 8 kanals 19 marlas (1.11 acres) situated at Village Kherki Majra Dhankot, Tehsil and District Gurgaon



Sunglow Overseas Private Limited

Garland Estate Private Limited and others


1,656,250 Suit for partition in respect of land measuring 13 kanals 5 marlas (1.65 acres) situated at Village

The next date of hearing is

665

S. No.


Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

Kherki Majra Dhankot, Tehsil and District Gurgaon

January 17, 2008

37. Not available 2007 Dujarba Overseas Private Limited

Garland Estate Private Limited, Legend Buildcon Private Limited, Logical Developers Private Limited and others


5,012,500 Suit for partition in respect of land situated at Village Kherki Majra Dhankot, Tehsil and District Gurgaon




Active Promoters Private Limited and others


3,375,000 Suit for partition in respect of land measuring 9 kanals (1.12 acres) situated at Village Kherki Majra Dhankot, Tehsil and District Gurgaon


39. Not available 2007 Sunglow Overseas Private Limited and another

Garland Estate Private Limited, Legend Buildcon Private Limited, Logical Developers Private Limited and others




40. Not available 2007 Saraswati Kunj Infrastructure Private Limited

Legend Buildcon Private Limited, Logical Developers Private Limited and others




41. Not available 2007 Dujarba Overseas Private Limited







Logical Developers Private Limited, Prosperous Buildcon Private Limited and others


23,615,600 Suit for partition in respect of land measuring 56 kanals 10.40 marlas (7.06 acres) situated at Village Kherki Majra Dhankot, Tehsil and District Gurgaon


43. Not available 2007 Sunglow Overseas Private Limited and another



5,684,688 Suit for partition in respect of land situated at Village Kherki Majra Dhankot, Tehsil and District Gurgaon


44. Suit No. 289/ 2007

July 2007

Dinesh Jain Active Promoters Private Limited

(ACJ) Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gurgaon

Not available Suit for Declaration, permanent injunction and specific performance of an agreement dated December 8, 2005 for a total consideration of Rs.30,000,000. This suit is in respect of land admeasuring 108 kanals and 18 marlas (13.61


666

S. No.


Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

acres) situated in revenue estate of Village Ullawas, Tehsil Sohna and District Gurgaon

45. Suit No. 261/ 2007

July 2007

Dinesh Jain True Value Buildcon Private Limited

(ACJ) Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gurgaon

Not available Suit for declaration, permanent injunction and specific performance of an agreement dated October 6, 2005 for a total consideration of Rs.100,000,000. This suit is in respect of land admeasuring 68 kanals and 13 marlas (8.58 acres) situated in revenue estate of Village Ghata, Tehsil Sohna and District Gurgaon


46. Not Available April 2007

Sivadasan and others

Authentic Properties Private Limited and another

District Court Ernakulam, Munsif Court, Aluva

Not avilable

Suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing the properties measuring 94 cents and 72.425 cents (1.66 acres) situated at Village Chengamanad and from constructing, alienating or creating charge over the property


47. RT-1366 20/07/2005

2005 Jagtar Singh and others

Dove Promoters Private Limited, Sidhivinayak Buildcon Private Limited and others

Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kharrar

Not available Suit for declaration that Plaintiff’s are owners to the extent of 2/5th share of property measuring 68 kanals 18 marlas (8.61 acres) situated at Village Raipur Kalan, Ropar and consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the above referred land


48. Suit No. 968/2006

September 2006

Jatinder Singh Virk

Kulbir and others

Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mohali

Suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienating a part of land situated at Village Jhampur, Mohali

An application has been filed to implead Charbhuja Properties Private Limited as a party to the suit. The next date of hearing is Januar

667

S. No.


Dated





Panel


(Rs.)


Status

y 18, 2008

49. Not available May 2007

Bachan Singh and others

Charismatic Realators Private Limited and others

Civil Judge, Senior Division, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali

Not applicable Suit for declaration and permanent injunction restraining respondents from dispossessing the plaintiffs from the suit land measuring 15 acres in Village Raipur Kalan, Tehsil Kharar, District Ropar as mentioned in notification number 1510/SYL/CONST./88 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1884 and notification number 1896/SYL/CONST./88 under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1884

The next

Emaar MGF Land Limited - Red Herring Prospectus · 2018. 8. 16. · Emaar group Emaar and companies...

Documents

Transcript of Emaar MGF Land Limited - Red Herring Prospectus · 2018. 8. 16. · Emaar group Emaar and companies...