Elior Besh and Karo
Transcript of Elior Besh and Karo
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
1/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
JOSEPH KARO AND ISRAEL BA`AL SHEM TOV:
MYSTICAL METAMORPHOSIS; KABBALISTIC INSPIRATION; SPIRITUAL
INTERNALIZATION
By
RACHEL ELIOR
Introd!t"on
Only rarely in the history of mysticism do we witness the emergence of some
entirely new phenomenon, created ex nihilo. More often, great creative thiners !ndergo
comple" internal transformations in the wae of profo!nd identification with earlier
thiners or writers, real or imagined, who are close to them in spirit# alternatively, they
internali$e inspiring wors that transcend %o!ndaries of time and space. &n the co!rse of
s!ch a metamorphosis, these creative individ!als spirit!ally incorporate the image or the
wor of the earlier fig!re, which maes itself felt conscio!sly or !nconscio!sly, as reality
or as reverie. 'he impressions made %y the earlier writers or writings can later evolve
into revelatory visions of a hidden world or as contact with hidden voices that %ridge the
concealed and the revealed. 'his sort of identification and internali$ation appear to go on
within the psyches of innovative mystical fig!res, to whom s!pernal worlds are revealed
and whose vistas of conscio!sness e"pand %eyond the %o!ndaries of time and space.
'hese creative fig!res %elieve that divine revelation did not come to an end with the
completion of the Bi%le# in their view, it contin!es in vario!s forms that are !ncovered
( 'his article, first p!%lished in Tarbiz: a quarterly for Jewish Studies )* +--) )/0/1
23e%rew4, was written as part of a research pro5ect of the 6ational 7cience 8!nd of the &srael
6ational 9cademy of 7cience. 'he article, incl!ding :!otations from primary so!rces, was
translated from the 3e%rew %y ;oel 9. Linsider and !pdated %y the a!thor.
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
2/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
thro!gh contact %etween religio!s virt!osi and inspirational te"ts. 'his sense of
contin!o!s divine revelation draws on the written mystical tradition and on the ever0
renewed mystical e"perience, which s!stain, ill!minate, and interpret each other. 'he
traces of this comple" process, in which written acco!nts are revitali$ed deep in the
psyches of religio!s innovators and traditional readings are re0dramati$ed in changing
circ!mstances, are evident in the mystical oe!vre thro!gho!t the generations. &n this
article, & want to e"amine this sort of mystical conversation, which traverses all
%o!ndaries of time and space# my central arg!ment is that the spirit!al world of Ra%%i
&srael Ba)# the second, complementing the L!%lin edition, was printed in @enice
in )>-. 9 consolidated edition, incl!ding %oth parts, was printed in 9msterdam in
/1?. 'he composition is a !ni:!e mystical a!to%iography, attesting to the hidden world
of a towering halahic fig!re !ndergoing intense internal str!ggles and giving free
On the %oo and its a!thor, see the classic st!dy %y Raphael. ;. Aevi er%lowsy, Joseph Karo
Lawyer and Mysti +Cd ed.# Dhiladelphia ;ewish D!%lication 7ociety -?1 +hereafter
er%lowsy, Karo. On the %i%liographical :!estions associated with the man!scripts and
printed editions of Maggid Meisharim, see er%lowsy, Karo C>0F/, F10F1?. 8or important
%iographical and %i%liographical developments since er%lowsy=s %oo was p!%lished, see Meir
Benayah!=s comprehensive wor !osef behiri maran rabbi yosef qaro2;oseph my chosen o!r
master Ra%%i ;oseph Karo4 +;er!salem Gad harav 6isim -- +hereafter Benayah!, !osef
behiri 23e%rew4 **0/, F-F0>C.
C
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
3/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
e"pression to the way in which the mystical e"perience %reaches esta%lished %o!ndaries. C
'wo factors contri%!te to the wor=s distinctiveness + the !nconstrained franness of
its a!thor, a man driven %y powerf!l internal imp!lse and mystical inspiration and writing
only for himself, never imagining his %oo wo!ld %e p!%lished# and +C its a!thor=s
freedom from esta%lished literary forms and e"ternal conventions, for at the time Maggid
Meisharim was written, there was as yet no e"tant ;ewish mystical a!to%iographical
literat!re, the "oharhad not yet %een printed, and the Ka%%alah had not ac:!ired the
standing it attained following the printing of the"ohar.F
COn Karo=s comple"ities and vario!s aspects of hisMaggid Meisharim, see er%lowsy,Karo-0
CF, >?0)?, C*/0C?)# id., HLi#demuto shel ha#maggid shel r$ yosef qaroI 2On the fig!re of R.
;oseph Karo=sMaggid4, TarbizC/ +-*? F10FC 23e%rew4# Aalman 7ha$ar, H"ofayi%h zefatI
2Go!r o%servers, O 7afed4, in Ko%h&ei boqer +'el09viv 9m Oved -/C C-F0FFC 23e%rew4
2English Morning Stars, trans. 7h!lamith 7chwart$ 6ardi +Dhiladelphia, -)/4# Mordechai
Dachter, HSefer Maggid Meisharim le#r$ yosef qaro %e#sefer musarI 2;oseph Karo=s Maggid
Meisharimas an ethical wor4, 'a(atC +-?? */0?F 23e%rew4# ;oseph Jan, HJoseph Karo
Lawyer and Mysti%y R. ;. A. er%lowsyI 2review4, TarbizFF +-)F ?-0-) 23e%rew4# Javid
'amar,Mehqarim be#toledot ha#yehudim be#erez yisra)el u#&e#italyah27t!dies in the history of
the ;ews of the Land of &srael and of &taly4 +;er!salem R!%in Mass -/F 101), ->0C11
23e%rew4# Moshe &del, H*yyunim be#shitat ba(al sefer ha#meishi&I 27t!dies in the method of the
a!thor of ha#meishi&4, Sefunot, / +6ew 7eries+-?F CC10CC) 23e%rew4.
FOn the pa!city of a!to%iographical writings in ;ewish mystical literat!re, see ershom 7cholem,
Ma+or Trends in Jewish Mystiism +Fd ed.# 6ew Gor 7chocen -*> +hereafter 7cholem,
Ma+or Trends *0), >/. On the change in the Ka%%alah=s standing aro!nd the middle of the
si"teenth cent!ry, see &saiah 'ish%y, H,a#pulmus al sefer ha#zohar ba#mei)ah ha#-. be#italiyahI
2On the polemic over the "ohar in si"teenth0cent!ry &taly4, /eraqim +-)/0-)? F0?C
23e%rew4# Rachel Elior, H,a#ma)a&aq al ma(amadah shel ha#qabbalah ba#me)ah ha0)I 2'he
str!ggle over the stat!s of the Ka%%alah d!ring the si"teenth cent!ry4, Jerusalem Studies in
Jewish Thought, +-? //0-1 23e%rew4# Janiel 9%rams, H0imatai huberah ha#haqdamah
le#sefer ha#zoharI 2hen was the introd!ction to the"oharwritten4,1sufot? +--> C0CC)
23e%rew4. 'he"oharwas first printed in Mant!a in **?. Sefer ha#"ohar. F vols. Mant!a Meir
%en Efraim and ;aco% %en 6aftali, **?0*)1.
F
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
4/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
Karo=s mystical revelations appear to have %eg!n in *FF,> in the wae of
7olomon Molho=s immolation at the stae in 6ovem%er *FC +MarheshvanKislev
*C-F at the hands of the &n:!isition in Mant!a.* 3is 5o!rnal attests to his yearning to %e
immolated on od=s altar, %!rnt for the sanctification of od=s 6ame. ) Molho=s auto#
da#f2was tied to his ref!sal to forsae his messianic aspirations and his desire to atone
for his past, to p!%licly sanctify the name of heaven, and to %e Han !n%lemished sacrifice,
>7ee f!rther on this %elow, n. ?.
*On 7olomon Molho, see 9aharon Aeev 9escoly,,a#tenu(ot ha#meshihiyot be#yisra)el2Jewish
Messiani Mo&ements4 +Cd ed# ;er!salem Mosad Biali -?? C-), >/0>C1, >C)0>C/ 23e%rew4#
7helomoh &del%erg, H,a#im nitla&&eh da&id ha#re)u&eini li#shelomoh mol%ho be#masa(o le#
regensburgI 2Jid Javid ha0Re!veini accompany 7olomon Molho on his 5o!rney to
Regens%!rg4, Tarbiz>C +-/F >?0*F 23e%rew4# Moshe &del, HShelomoh mol%ho %e#magiqonI
27olomon Molho as magician4, Sefunot +new series F +? +-?* -F0C- 23e%rew4. On the
connection %etween Karo and Molho, see 7ha$ar, "ofayi%h zefatI +a%ove, n. C F110F1#
er%lowsy,Karo, -/0--. 'he date of Molho=s death is a matter of controversy, some placing it
in *C-C and others in *C-F, %!t the earlier year appears to %e %ased on an error in calc!lation and
he most liely went to the stae in early *C-F. Relia%le information in a letter %y Ra%%i 9$riel
Jiena of Mant!a +d. *F) places Molho still in &taly in El!l *C-C +the last month of that year
+9escoly, ;ewish Messianic Movement, C-), >CF# the writer, one of Molho=s s!pporters, notes
that on C? El!l *C-C, Molho was mentioned in the %lessing for the living. Eyewitness testimony
%y ;oseph of Rosheim relates to a meeting %etween Molho and Emperor Nharles @ at the end of
*FC, %!t does not refer to the date of Molho=s death. Molho therefore m!st have gone to the
stae in *C-F, for he wo!ld have had to reach Regens%!rg in Bavaria in order to meet with the
Emperor Karl @ and then ret!rn to Mant!a, where he met his death. 9$ariah di Rossi +*0
*/?, a native of Mant!a, noted in his Me)or einayim+@ilna ?)), -F that 7olomon Molho
was %!rned in Mant!a in *C-F# according to 7helomoh 7imonson +Toledot ha#yehudim be#
du%hasut manto&a 2,istory of the Jews in the 'uhy of Mantua4, +;er!salem Kiryat 7efer
-)F ? 23e%rew4, who compares acco!nts %y Mant!an chroniclers to the nown ;ewish
so!rces, Molho was e"ec!ted d!ring the second half of 6ovem%er *FC, corresponding to
Marheshvan or Kislev of *C-F.
)7ee er%lowsy,Karo, -/0--, *0*>.
>
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
5/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
a pleasing savor %efore od.I &n the late *C1s and early *F1s, Molho was involved in
efforts, %oth terrestrial and mystical, to hasten the redemption. 3is death p!t an end to
real0world reali$ation of the hope for redemption and stirred !p the a%%alists of the
generation of the 7panish e"p!lsion and their s!ccessors thro!gho!t the si"teenth cent!ry.
'hese a%%alists, with ties to the circles of R. ;oseph 'aita$a and his st!dent, R.
7olomon 9la%e$ in the Ottoman Empire, reinterpreted the lin %etween the a%%alistic
tradition and eschatological e"pectations, form!lated a mystical sym%iosis %etween E"ile
and Redemption, and esta%lished a comple" process of internali$ing the hopes for the
messianic age.
/
Karo was close to these circles, and his mystical yearnings were tied to the
profo!nd change in his conscio!sness regarding the hidden meaning of E"ile and
Redemption. 3is first mystical revelation mentioned inMaggid Meisharimtoo place on
the night of the 7a%%ath, CC 9dar & *C-F +*FF, a few months following Molho=s auto#
da#f2.? 'he revelation incl!ded a mystical way of life dictated from the heavens# a
comm!nication related to the f!t!re of his family# a vision of his immolation at the stae,
/On ;oseph 'aita$a=s circle in 7alonia, see ershom 7cholem, H,a#Maggid shel yosef taitaze%
&e#ha#giluyim ha#meyuhasim loI 2;oseph 'aita$a=s Maggid and the revelations attri%!ted to
him4, Sefunot +-/ )/0C 23e%rew4# Bracha Aa, H1l peirusha& ha#darshaniyim shel yosef
taitaze%I 2On ;oseph 'aita$e=s homiletical e"egesis4, Shlomo /ines Jubilee 3olume2Jerusalem
Studies in Jewish Thought, /4 +;er!salem 3e%rew niversity -??, pp. F>0F** 23e%rew4 and
%i%liographical notes id. On 7olomon 9la%e$, see Mordechai Dachter, HSifrut ha#derush &e#ha#
musar shel ha%hmei zefat ba#me)ah ha#-. u#ma(are%het ra(ayonoteha ha#iqqariyimI 23omiletical
and ethical literat!re of the 7afed sages d!ring the si"teenth cent!ry and its principal ideas4,
doctoral dissertation, 3e%rew niv. of ;er!salem, -/), F?0-F 23e%rew4# id., Mi#zefunot zefat
24rom Safed)s ,idden Treasures4 +;er!salem Aalman 7ha$ar Nenter for ;ewish 3istory --> /0
F? 23e%rew4# Bracha Aa, H5alut u#ge)ulah bi#&erit ha#le&i le#rabbi shelomoh alqabezI 2E"ile
and redemption in Ra%%i 7olomon 9la%e$=s Berit ha0levi4,0shel 6e)er She&aC +-?1 C)*0C?)
23e%rew4.
*
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
6/81
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
7/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
mentorI the qol ha#medabber +speaing voice or the mala%h ha#go)el +redeeming
angel assigned him direct responsi%ility for its elevation and its redemption. 'he
heavenly fig!re speas to him sim!ltaneo!sly as the voice of the e"iled da!ghter of Aion,
eening in the words of the Boo of Lamentations over the destr!ction of ;er!salem and
the 'emple# and in the voice of the Mishnah+identified in his conscio!sness with the
e"iled She%hinah signifying the dispersion of the ;ewish people nown as 5alut, e"ile.,
speaing to him in the words of the "ohar+sacred mystical %oo ascri%ed to the second
cent!ry sage R. 7imeon %ar Gohai, where the She%hinahis prominent and ass!ring him
that he will have the favor of p!%licly sanctifying od=s 6ame and %eing sacrificed on
od=s altar in the Land of &srael. 'he ass!rances are iss!ed %y the voice that speas
within him on condition that he fast, p!rify himself, st!dy, %e 5oined to od, and devote
himself ceaselessly to the redemption of the She%hinah.1
1On this mystical entity and its vario!s names, see %elow, te"t at nn. -0C1. 'he first appearance
of the termMaggidto denote a heavenly force that reveals the mysteries of the 'orah seems to %e
in Sefer ha#,esheq, a Fthcent!ry erman0;ewish commentary on the seventy names of the angel
Metatron Hone who nows the seventy names of Metatron can accomplish whatever he may
want# %!t it re:!ires sanctity and p!rification in hot and cold water and fasting and se"!al
a%stinence, and it re:!ires prayer and 'orah st!dy. 9nd if yo! do this, he will then reveal to yo!
all the mysteries of the 'orah and yo! will %e a%le to invoe a Maggidat yo!r will, as yo! wish,
and he can wor other wonders.I +Sefer ha#,esheq, end of the section %eginning 6eit din le#
rabbi a&raham hamui 2Livorno, ?*F4, F% 23e%rew4. 7helomoh Dines has shown that %y the
early Middle 9ges, the termMaggidhad already come to mean an angel or spirit!al force that
reveals mysteries. 7helomoh Dines, Le Sefer ha#Tamar et les Maggidim des Kabbalistes
,ommage 8 5eorge 3a+da: etudes d)histoire et de pensee +ui&es editees par erard 6ahon
et Nharles 'o!ati+Lo!vain Editions Deeters -?1 F>?0F)F. 9n ill!minating e"planation of the
term=s essential meaning d!ring the si"teenth cent!ry appears in Moses Nordovero, 'erashot be#
inyanei ha#mal)a%him2Jisco!rses on angels4 +printed at the end of Re!ven Margaliot, Mal)a%hi
elyon 2;er!salem Mossad haRav Koo ->*4 )>0)* 23e%rew4, reprinted in Sefer ha#zohar9
zohar hadash al megillot shir ha#shirim9 ei%hah &e#rut9 im peirush or yaqar mei#ramaq 2'he
/
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
8/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
'he comments of theMishnahShe%hinahclearly show the lin %etween Molho=s
deathwhich Karo interpreted as a higher p!rification, an atonement, a sanctification of
od=s 6ame, the sacrifice of an individ!al who, %y his s!ffering, atones for the sins of the
m!ltit!deand Karo=s yearning to give !p his life, to p!rify himself, and p!%licly
sanctify the name of heaven
& will grant yo! the favor of %eing p!%licly %!rned in the Land of &srael to
p!%licly sanctify my name and yo! will %e raised as a pleasing sacrifice on
my altarP5!st as 7olomon my chosen one was favored to %e called
HMolhoI 2from the root for HingI4, for he was anointed many times
from on high and went !p pleasingly on my altarPand it is &, theMishnah,speaing in yo!r mo!th +MMF)C.
Jo#$%& K'ro+D$!"#or 'nd K',,'("#t
;oseph Karo immigrated to 7afed, in the Land of &srael, in *C-) +*F*), in the
wae of a mystical revelation on the eve of the festival of 7hav!ot in *CFF +*FF or
*CF> +*F>.C &n the co!rse of that revelation, he heard the voice of the e"iled
She%hinah calling on him to go !p to the Land of &srael and participate in its
redemption.F 9n additional motivation was his longing to %e immolated at the stae as
"ohar,"ohar hadash, on 7ong of 7ongs, Lamentations and R!th, with the commentary r !aqar
of Ra%%i Moses Nordovero4 +;er!salem 9h!$at &srael --, vol. F, p. C1 23e%rew4. 7ee also
3ayyim @ital, Sha(ar ;uah ha#7odesh +;er!salem, -C, a0%. 23e%rew4 On the phenomenon
of theMaggidin the a%%alistic tradition, see &del,*yyunim +a%ove, n. C, ?F0CC).
8or additional references to the promise of immolation at the stae, cf.MM), *C.
C9ccording to er%lowsy, +Karo. C, C->, Karo immigrated to the Land of &srael in *C-/
+*F)/. B!t it is clear from the st!dies of 3aim Aalman Jimitrovsy +%elow, n. * and 'amar,
7t!dies +a%ove, n. C that he immigrated in *C-) +*F*). Nf. Benayah!, !osef behiri, **0).
FOn the 7hav!ot0night revelation, see 7olomon 9la%e$=s epistle in Maggid Meisharim+L!%lin,
)>), &ntrod!ction 23e%rew4# &saiah 3orowit$, Shenei Luhot ha#6erit, part C +9msterdam,
?
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
9/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
7olomon Molho had %een and to sanctify od=s 6ame in the 3oly Land. &n the years
following his immigration, he headed a ma5or yeshiva in 7afed# e"perienced n!mero!s
mystical revelations, reco!nted in writing in Maggid Meisharim# completed his 6eit
!osef, a large halahic wor p!%lished d!ring the **1s# wrote his Shulhan 1ru%h,
printed in the *)1s# composed an e"tended series of commentaries, novellae, and
halahic %oos#> and fo!ght to sec!re his primacy among the sages of the Land of
&srael.*
)>-, Mase%het She&u(ot, 1mud ha#Torah ?1a 23e%rew4. 'he epistle is incl!ded at the
%eginning of the ;er!salem, -)1 edition of Maggid Meisharim, %ased on the 9msterdam edition
of /1?. English translation of the epistle see Lo!is ;aco%s, Q'he Nomm!nication of the
3eavenly Mentor to Ra%%i ;oseph KaroQ, Jewish Mystial Testimonies, +6ew Gor 7chocen
Boos -// -?01>. er%lowsy +Karo, 1?0 tho!ght the revelation had taen place on
7hav!ot of *F1 or *F># Dachter +"efunot zefat, C0CC arg!edrelying on the date of 7olomon
9la%e$=s immigration to the Land of &srael and passage from 7alonia to 6iopol en ro!tethat
the correct date was *F># see also Benayah!, !osef behiri, */. &t appears that these dates are
incorrect, for it is not at all impossi%le that the tiqqun leil sha&u(ot+the 7hav!ot vigil or night
ceremony too place in 7alonia in *FF, a few months after the first revelation to Karo +the
night of the 7a%%ath, CC 9dar & *C-F 2*FF4, following Molho=s going to the stae. Dachter
showed that 9la%e$ was in 7alonia in the month of &yyar *C-> +spring of *F> and immigrated
to the Land of &srael that s!mmer# there is, accordingly, room for do!%t that he was still in
7alonia in 7ivan +the month that incl!des 7hav!ot of that year. Moreover, in his epistle on the
7hav!ot0night revelation, 9la%e$ does not tae leave of his colleag!es in the manner of one soon
to depart for the Land of &srael# and the year *C-F +*FF %etter s!its the data on the time of the
revelation. On the place of 7hav!ot in the Aoharic tradition and the %acgro!nd for tiqqun leil
sha&u(ot, see %elow, n. >>.
>8or a list of Karo=s writings, see er%lowsy,Karo, F1?0F1.
*7ee 3aim Aalman Jimitrovsy, H3i%uah she#a&ar bein maran rabbi yosef qaro &e#ha#mabbitI
29 disp!te %etween o!r master Ra%%i ;oseph Karo and Ra%%i Moses %en ;oseph of 'rani4,
Sefunot) +-)C -10-> 23e%rew4# Git$ha Raphael, ed., Sefer rabbi yosef qaro2R. ;oseph Karo
vol!me4 +;er!salem Mossad haRav Koo -)- 23e%rew4# Benayah!, !osef behiri, -0-?.
-
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
10/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
3istorians of hala%hah have shown 6eit !osef to %e do!%ly innovative it
employed a method that %!ndled Hall the laws that are practicedI and the opinions of all
previo!s decisors, reaching concl!sions in the principal halahic areas in accordance with
a novel r!le of decision#)and it offered a !ni:!e melding of the 9shena$i and 7efardi
halahic traditions, assigning !nprecedented halahic a!thority to the "ohar and
incorporating laws drawn from the a%%alistic literat!re into the decision0maing process
in a manner previo!sly !nnown. &nMaggid Meisharim, the nat!re of these innovations
is reflected in the She%hinah=s comments to Karo H'herefore, %e strong and of good
co!rage in yo!r 'orah st!dy, as yo! engage in 'orah,Mishnah, 5emara, Rashi, Tosafot,
halahic r!lings, and Ka%%alah. 8or yo! lin them to one another, and all the celestial
angels see yo!r peace and well%eingI +MMC*?./
)7ee ;oseph Karo,6eit !osef, &ntrod!ction, rah ,ayyim+@enice, **1 23e%rew4. Karo %egan
to write6eit !osefin *CC, in '!rey. 'he first edition of the rah ,ayyimsection was printed in
**1# the two other sections were printed in **0**F. On the innovative nat!re of 6eit !osef
and its significance, see &srael 'a07hma, H;abbi yosef qaro bein ash%enaz li#sefarad
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
11/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
&t is evident from Maggid Meisharim that while Karo was developing his new
method for codifying hala%hot, he was sim!ltaneo!sly seeing o!t the metaphysical
significance of the commandments and looing %eyond the tradition in an effort to find
the spirit!al p!rpose of religio!s activity. 'his can %e seen in the repeated references in
his diary to the f!ndamental connection %etween the commandments and the a%%alistic
tradition. 3e writes, in the name of theMaggid, Hthat every positive commandment and
every negative commandment is dependent on the ten sefirot 2divine emanations4 s!ch
that 2even4 a minor transgression is dependent on a high mo!ntain, that is, thesefirotI
+MMF?. 9nd H&nasm!ch as the sacred aspect has revealed itself, all o!r efforts are
directed toward repelling the imp!re aspect from the sacred aspect, and that is the
mystery of all the commandmentsI +MMC*/. &n other words, the commandments were
given to separate the forces of evil from the sacred, and to resolve the cosmic str!ggle. ?
'hese characteri$ations show that Karo, in his spirit!al vision, identified Mishnahwith
Ka%%alah, the halahic element in legal decision0maing with the mystical element. 'he
Maggid=s words attest to that identification of Mishnah and Ka%%alah HGo! m!st
recogni$e that it is &, theMishnah, who spea in yo!r mo!th P & am theMishnah, and
within me is the tr!e wisdom 2i.e., Ka%%alah4I +MMC0F. 'hat identification generated
a comple" connection %etween the revealed terrestrial p!rpose, inferred from the
Mishnahand its ramifications, and the hidden mystical p!rpose, dependent on Ka%%alah
and its revelations. Maggid Meisharim incl!des a detailed acco!nt of the dialog!e
%etween Karo and a heavenly entity that e"plains to him the hidden p!rposes of serving
od in light of a%%alistic tho!ght and draws a connection %etween halahic analysis and
?/arashat 3ayaqhel+MM-) offers a prominent e"ample of halahic reasoning flowing from a
a%%alistic worldview.
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
12/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
a%%alistic ascent and !nion. 'hat entity sim!ltaneo!sly em%odies the Mishnahand the
Ka%%alah, the She%hinahand the 'orahthat is, %oth the revealed so!rce of the law
pertaining to the terrestrial comm!nity of &srael and its concealed meaning, pertaining to
the heavenly comm!nity of &srael.
Nreating a new constr!ct that sets o!t new principles re:!ires the a%ility to %reach
accepted norms and transcend conventional modes of tho!ght. &n the traditional world,
which loos to the past as for a!thority, depart!res of that sort cannot %e legitimated
conventionally and therefore re:!ire internal validation or higher s!pport. Karo, whose
great halahic treatise was an !nprecedented wor, hoped that it wo!ld gain acceptance
%y a wide range of congregations and comm!nities. 6at!rally, he was concerned that his
overall method for com%ining the so!rces of hala%hahwo!ld not %e well received and
that his innovationinterweaving r!lings from the"oharand the a%%alistic literat!re
into the halahic systemwo!ld not %e properly !nderstood.
'hese concerns are clearly evident in the fre:!ent references in Maggid
Meisharim to 6eit !osefand in theMaggid=s rec!rring promises, in Karo=s visions, that
his %oo wo!ld %e accepted %y the ma5or ;ewish comm!nities of his time thro!gho!t the
world H9nd & will grant yo! the favor of completing all yo!r treatises, with yo!r r!lings
free of dissent or error, and of printing them and disseminating them thro!gho!t the
;ewish world. 9nd after that, yo! will %e %!rnt for the sanctification of My 6ame and
yo! will depart 2this world4 as a clean sheaf 2i.e., free of chaff4I +MM*1. HBe strong
and of good co!rage# do not fear and do not dread. 8or od will %ring s!ccess to all yo!r
efforts, and all that yo! have done and ta!ght to this day will %e s!stained %y od. 9nd it
is agreed in the heavenly academy, as od lives, that this r!ling is tr!e and esta%lished, as
C
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
13/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
a law given to Moses at 7inaithe hala%hah is in accordance with yo!r view and
reasoningI +MMF?.-
Karo=s mystical e"periencein which he received Hspeech of the MaggidI or
Hrevelation of the She%hinahIseems to have afforded him heavenly confirmation that
he was on the right path. Maggid Meisharimth!s appears to have %een conceived %y
Karo in m!ltiple conte"ts against the %acgro!nd of his in:!iry into the metaphysical
meaning of the hala%hah# as a :!est for divine confirmation of the propriety of his
innovations in halahic decision0maing# and against the %acgro!nd of his profo!nd
personal identification with 7olomon Molho=s act of sanctifying od=s 6amean act
tied to the hidden meaning of the myth of E"ile and Redemption.
Maggid Meisharim ill!strates well the power of mystical e"perience, infl!enced
%y the premise that a hidden, mysterio!s layer of meaning lies %eyond the plain sense of a
te"t. 'hat hidden layer, which can %e !ncovered %y means of the generative lang!age
shared %y od and man, is gro!nded in the ne"!s %etween the written te"t and the hidden
reality of the s!pernal world. &t is e"pressed in the the!rgic connection %etween h!man
acts and tho!ghts in the terrestrial world and the hidden divine processes that go on the
worlds a%ove. 9gainst the %acgro!nd of Karo=s in:!iries into the concealed and the
- 9 considera%le part of Maggid Meisharim was written while Karo was also writing the
comprehensive code of ;ewish law,6eit !osef. Nf. 7ha$ar,"ofayi%h zefat+a%ove, n. C C-)0C--#
er%lowsy,Karo, -), ?)0?/. On Karo=s aspirations, see his prayer at the concl!sion of 6eit
!osef H& %eseech od, & plead %efore 3im that he grant that 2my %oo4 %e spread thro!gho!t all
&srael, so & will ca!se the m!ltit!de to act righteo!sly.I +&n ,oshen Mishpat, 2@enice, *F?
+**-4 FFC%. 23e%rew4 7ee also MM F, F)C. On his self0image as a halahic decisor
recogni$ed on high and the distinctiveness of his halahic enterprise, see MM /, *. 'he
She%hinah=s fre:!ently rec!rring promises, descri%ed in detail thro!gho!t Maggid Meisharim,
attest to Karo=s hopes for the completion of Beit Gosef and its wide acceptance thro!gho!t &srael
and to his mystical yearnings to %e %!rned at the stae as a sacrifice on an altar.
F
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
14/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
revealed, the hidden divine %eing comes to %e personified in Karo=s mind in the
m!ltifaceted image of the She%hinah, which represents sim!ltaneo!sly the divine voice as
it speas and the written terrestrial te"t, the active element and the passive element, the
masc!line element and the feminine element in the s!pernal worlds. hat res!lts from
this d!ality is a new, mystical meaning for the service of od.
Karo=s 5o!rnal points to the comple" psychic world of one %o!nd !p in st!dy# the
m!lti0layered dialog!e he carries on with the te"t# and the vitali$ation of the a%%alistic
myth of the She%hinah, in which the She%hinahis transformed from a hallowed literary
entity into a mythic0mystical fig!re %!rsting from one realm to another. 'he threefold
identity in Maggid Meisharim%etween the She%hinahand theMishnah, %etween the
She%hinahand its varied em%odiments in a%%alistic myth, and %etween theMishnahand
Karo=s so!le"plains why the She%hinahreveals itself to him when he is reading and
st!dying mishnayot the She%hinah, which defines itself as Karo=s so!l andMishnah, or
as a m!lti0faceted, %ise"!al, m!lti0vocal entity, reveals to him a%%alistic mysteries on
the one hand and, on the other, enco!rages his halahic wor and e"plains its s!pernal
significance
8or yo! have %een e"alted thro!gh the merit of yo!r innovations regarding
mishnayot# and &, theMishnahspeaing with yo!, 2say4 that even tho!gh
yo! have not yet completed all of them, inasm!ch as yo! have learned
most of Seder 7odashim2the portion of theMishnahdealing with the laws
of the 'emple and sacrifices4, any time yo! read from it, yo! are %ringing
sacrifices and %!rnt offerings %efore me in the 3oly 'emple. 9nd yo!
em%race the entire Mishnahand she em%races yo!, and & say to yo!,
Hcome greet me, my sister, my %eloved, etc. 2cf. 7ong of 7ongs *C4# &
desire yo!, & love yo!.I +MM F/-.
>
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
15/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
'he st!dy of Seder 7odashimand the laws that govern sacrificial offerings in the
terrestrial 'emple is transformed in Karo=s mind into a mystical e"perience of %ringing
sacrifices in the heavenly 'emple. &n other words, the te"t!al reality involved in reading
and st!dying passages that pertain to the destroyed terrestrial 'emple and def!nct
sacrificial c!lt %ecomes, in his mind=s eye, a palpa%le metaphysical reality tied to the
act!al %ringing of sacrifices in the heavenly 'emple. 'he connection drawn in Maggid
Meisharim%etween the composition %eing st!died and the st!dentwho is changed from
reader to listener, from scholar to mystic acting as a medi!m thro!gh whom the te"t
speas with a divine voiceis a %ond of mystical !nion form!lated in %ise"!al erotic
lang!age calling for !nending de&eiqut +%onding, adhering, !nion with the divine. 'hat
connection, %ased on the transformation of the st!dent=s voice, reciting mishnayotalo!d,
into the voice of theMishnahspeaing in and to him, is evidence that the te"t!al material
+the writtenMishnah has metamorphosed into a tangi%le mystical reality +the Mishnah
speaing in and thro!gh him, identified with the She%hinah, with the Hvoice of my
%eloved,I with theMatronita, with the congregation of &srael, and with the mysteries of
theKabbalah. 'he mystical !nion is %ased on the identity of h!man and divine tho!ght
and speech +H&, & am the Mishnahthe She%hinah speaing in yo!r mo!thI and on an
ascent %eyond the %o!ndaries of terrestrial space and time. 'his m!lti0vocal connection
reflects the opened passageways %etween heaven and earth that !nderlie the mystical
e"perience and the %reaching of the %o!ndaries of past and f!t!re that taes place when
the divine and the h!man are !nited %eyond the %o!ndaries of time and space.
T&$ P('!$ o- t&$Shekhinah.Maggid"n K'ro/# 0or(d
*
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
16/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
Maggid Meisharim is an e"traordinary a!to%iographical te"t that reveals the
comple" spirit!al story of a learned mystic conversing with a m!ltifaceted inner voice.
Karo gives this voice a variety of names infl!enced %oth %y scholarly tradition and %y
Aoharic myth She%hinah, Mishnah, neshamah +Hso!lI, Matronita +Hthe LadyI em
meyasseret+Hre%!ing motherI,Maggid, %innor menaggen me#eila&+Hharp playing on
its ownI and qol dodi+Hvoice of my %elovedI +see 7ongs of 7ongs. 'he voice has no
one name or single identity, not even a fi"ed gender or set t!ne# it is, rather, a m!lti0
faceted, protean entity that %reaches all %o!ndaries of time and place H&, & am the
Mishnahspeaing in yo!r mo!th. & dry the seas and pierce raha& 2a sea dragon4. & am
the re%!ing mother. & am the redeeming angel thro!gh the mystery of ;aco%, who said,
Sthe angel who redeems me= 2en. >?)4I +MM ># cf. F-# H3e said to me as wellP
that & am the mother of whom it is said Hhis mother re%!es himI 2Drov. F4 +F?# H&, it
is & who spea with yo!# yo!r so!l +neshamahnot life +nefesh, not spirit +ruah, %!t
the so!l +neshamah itself. 9ltho!gh prophecy has departed from &srael, it has not
departed from within yo!, for & contin!ally come to yo! to g!ide yo! in the path to
followI +F/1# H9nd everything said %y the Maggiddepends on that mysteryI +C*>#
Hwherever yo! may %e, do not cease to thin of mePfor yo! will %e the encampment of
the She%hinah, and the She%hinahwill spea in yo!r mo!thI +*)# HBehold, the voice of
my %eloved po!nds within my mo!th, and a harp plays on its ownI +C># cf. /F#
HBehold, a harp plays on its ownI +F*?.
'he designation most often !sed in Maggid Meisharim for the mystical entity
heard %y Karo is Hthe Mishnah,I which !s!ally speas in the feminine voice. here,
however, the voice refers to itself and :!otes statements made on earlier occasions, he
)
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
17/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
!ses the termMaggid or ha#mal)a%h ha#go)el2redeeming angel4 +MMC*>, F)/, F-.
Karo generally speas of the voice in masc!line terms inspired %y the love lang!age of
7ong of 7ongsHthe voice of my %eloved po!nds within my mo!thI,and !ses masc!line
no!ns and ver%%!t !ses the feminine in citing its words.C1 'he %ise"!al, m!ltifaceted
nat!re of the Maggid draws on the Aoharic sym%olism of the of sefirah of mal%hut
+sovereignty, which oscillates %etween masc!linity and femininity, %etween mercy and
5!stice, %etween good and eviland is vario!sly nown as Hthe redeeming angel,I Hthe
comm!nity of &srael,I Matronita, She%hinah, Mishnah, Hmother,I Hharp,I H%eloved,I
etc.
C
'his entity alternates %etween speaing in the a!thoritative voice of a heavenly
messenger and in the pleading voice of the e"iled She%hinah# in the chastising voice of
C1 On the androgyno!s nat!re of the divine, cf. Mircea Eliade, The Two and the ne
+Nhicago niversity of Nhicago Dress -/- ?10C>. On crossing gender %o!ndaries in
;ewish Mystical literat!re cf. Elliot R. olfson, =irle in the Square: Studies in the >se of
5ender in the Kabbalisti Symbolism, +9l%any 7tate niversity of 6ew Gor Dress --* /-0
CC, C1Fn.
COn these epithets for thesefirahof mal%hutin the"ohar, see the references to them in Moses
Nordovero, /ardes ;immonim +;er!salem, Gerid hasefarim C111, reprint of Krao &t$ha %en
9haron *-C, Sha(arCF, Sha(ar er%hei ha#%inuyyim. On the connection %etween the Maggid
and the sym%olism of thesefirahof mal%hut, see er%lowsy,Karo9 C-)0C?). On the comple"
characteri$ation of this sefirah in the Aoharic tradition and its essential oscillation %etween
masc!linity and femininity +Hthat is the angel that sometimes is male and sometimes is femaleI,
see "ohar +;er!salem Mossad haRav Koo -)>, vols. 0F part , CFCa# part F, >Ca0%
29ramaic4. Nf. &saiah 'ish%y and Dhishel Lachover, Mishnat ha#zohar 2'he teaching of the
"ohar4 +hereafterMishnat ha#zohar, vol. +;er!salem Mossad Bialo, -*/ C-0C)F# on its
metamorphosing nat!re, see id., C-0CC1. On its feminine nat!re, its d!ality, and the rich
sym%olism ascri%ed to it in a%%alistic tradition, see ershom 7cholem ?She%hinah 'he
8eminine Element in Jivinity,Q idem., n The Mystial Shape of the 5odhead, +6ew Gor
7chocen Boos -- >10-)# On its d!al essence and the so%ri:!et Hredeeming angel,I
+enesis >?) see id., ?*0?). Nf. Mishnat ha#"ohar, , CC), CF/ # olfson. =irle, ?0C1,
1F0*, C0F, C1F, CC1n.
/
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
18/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
the re%!ing mother and the m!ry sym%olic wording of the "ohar# it forges a new
interdependence %etween the mystic and the s!pernal world. &t descri%es to Karo the
heavenly congregation in whose presence he lives in tho!ght and deed and the comple"
connection %etween his activities in the terrestrial world and the raising of the She%hinah
and its !nification with od in the s!pernal worlds. 'o that end, it e"plains a%%alistic
mysteries to him, e"plicates his life0events and those of people close to him, reveals the
f!t!re to him, interprets the"oharfor him, and e"plains the lofty significance of constant
st!dy and of an ascetic way of life that leads to sanctification of od=s 6ame and self0
sacrifice. 'he Maggidg!ides Karo in developing a mystical0ecstatic spirit!al stance
flowing from !nending st!dy and constant !nion with od or with the 7hehinah,
defined in the mystical voca%!lary as de&equt. 'heMaggid e"plains to him the infinite
power of meditating on the words of the 'orah and its decisive importance for raising the
She%hinahfrom her e"ile and promoting her !nion with od in the s!pernal worlds. &n
order to develop the desired mystical conscio!sness, the Maggid enco!rages strict
asceticism, ren!nciation of physical pleas!res, and alienation from this worldthe realm
of thesitra ahra+the Hother sideI# the forces of evil and the em%lem of e"ile. 7eparation
from the world, in tho!ght and deed, and division %etween the physical and the spirit!al
are preconditions to de&equtwith the She%hinah. 'heMaggidgoes on to set forth the
comple" image of the divine world, the d!alistic concept of the world, the mystical
commingling of realms !nder the infl!ence of h!man actions, the a%%alistic reasons for
the commandments, the mysteries of reincarnation, and the critical the!rgic import of
reciting the sacred written words of the divine voice, of engaging in Ka%%alah, and of
concentrating one=s tho!ghts on the s!pernal worlds.
?
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
19/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
'he voices that Karo heard and recorded in his 5o!rnal as well as the visions that
he descri%ed afford a many0sided e"pression to the conscio!sness of an e"treme
individ!alist who creates a world of his own thro!gh the !se of mystical concepts %oth
familiar and novel. &t liewise e"presses his self0perception as a halahic innovator,
forging novel principles of halahic creativity and drawing his a!thority from heavenly
so!rces, as did Moses and Ra%%i 7imeon %ar Gohai.CC &n addition, the voices convey the
sense of a divided ego, made !p of opposing forces that draw on the adaptation and
internali$ation of earlier literary mystical traditions and their vis!al co!nterparts within
him. Karo personifies within his mind the a%%alistic te"t of the "ohar, recites the
written te"t of the Mishnah, and transforms a meta0temporal te"t!al reality into a
personal, immediate, vis!al reality that speas to him and instills new a%%alistic
significance into his halahic activity. &n his imagination, he dramati$es the te"t of the
"ohar, animates it, and transforms it into a d!al entity that, on the one hand, pleads with
him to %e diligent in his st!dy and his contemplation of halahic and a%%alistic ideas
and, on the other, entices him to give himself over to worldly pleas!res and sens!al
CC9la%e$, who !ses terms and images %orrowed from the %i%lical acco!nt of the enco!nter at
7inai +E". -)0C1# C1? to descri%es theMaggid)swords at the tiqqun leil sha&u(ot, refers to
the heavenly %eing speaing in Karo=s mo!th as a Hspeaing voiceI +qol medabberan all!sion
to the verse H9nd when Moses went into the tent of meeting that 3e might spea with him, then
he heard the @oice speaing !nto him from a%ove the ar0cover that was !pon the ar of the
testimony, from %etween the two cher!%im# and 3e spoe with himI +6!m. /?-. 'he "ohar)s
comment on Mosesthe 3oly One %lessed %e 3e speas thro!gh his mo!th and wrote these
mysteries thro!gh his hands +part F, CFCaliewise is lined to the voice of the She%hinahthat
spoe from Karo=s throat. 'he profo!nd identification with the fig!re of Moses as the redeemer
%ringing the people to the Land of &srael, as the giver of the 'orah, as one thro!gh whose throat
the She%hinahspeas, and as one favored to hear divine speech pervades the entire acco!nt of the
7hav!ot0night revelation, lined in 9la%e$=s acco!nt to the giving of the 'orah and the enco!nter
at 7inai.
-
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
20/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
desires. 3e %rings the Aohar=s anthropomorphism to life and creates, in his mind=s eye, a
personification of sanctity in the m!lti0vocal image of the She%hinahwhich, as noted
earlier, encompasses the Mishnah, the 'orah, the Matronita, the redeeming angel, the
Maggid, the sefirah of mal%hut, the e"iled comm!nity of &srael, and even Karo=s own
so!l, craving !nion in the s!pernal worlds. 'his polyphonic entity addresses him in
endearing terms and teaches him, admonishes and ass!ages him, confirms his way or
deprecates his practices, e"plicates mysteries for him, implores him to tae part in her
redemption, and demands of him, to that end, that he not interr!pt his st!dy and de&equt
even for a moment. 'he voice ass!res him f!lfillment of his physical and spirit!al
re:!ests as long as he directs his tho!ghts to raising !p the She%hinahand to its !nion
with od.
T&$ P('!$ o- t&$ 1Ot&$r S"d$2 "n K'ro/# T&o3&t
&n contrast to his representation of sanctity in the form of the She%hinahMaggid,
Karo creates as well a mythic animation of imp!rity in the form of the world of the
qelippot +Hh!ssI# sing., qelippah. 'his world encompasses 7ama=el, the serpent, the
7atan, the Hother sideI +sitra ahra, all the e"ternal and internal threatening powers and
the evil imp!lse. 'hese fig!res p!rs!e Karo, threaten him, and try to divert his attention
from ongoing de&equt# they intend there%y to e"tend the She%hinah=s fall and
imprisonment. &n mythical, mystical tho!ght, the Hother sideI represents the contin!ed
power of the archaic forces of evil and the destr!ctive, tragic aspect of %oth the s!pernal
and the h!man worldsthe acc!m!lated stychic forces of the material, the li%ido, and the
C1
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
21/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
physical eros.CF 'his mythic entity, which sym%oli$es to Karo the tri!mph of e"ile over
redemption, incorporates the portions of his psyche that are drawn to physicality and
em%odies hedonistic eros and sinf!l tho!ghts a%o!t physical needs and the delights of the
terrestrial world. &t reflects as well all that is for%idden %y the ascetic ethosthings Karo
feels drawn to %!t from which he wants to distance himself.
Karo lives his inner life, as descri%ed %y the Maggid, %etween the heavenly
congregation and the terrestrial
8or yo! shall adhere to me and my 'orah, and my awesomeness and my
mishnayotand shall not depart even for an instant, and & will grant yo!
passage among those who stand here 2i.e., the angels# see Aech. F/4. &
will favor yo! with the !nerring completion of all yo!r treatises and with
their p!%lication and dissemination thro!gho!t the ;ewish worldPand all
the angels on high will see yo!r welfare. +MM C*?C>
Karo=s life oscillates %etween the a"is of sanctity and the a"is of imp!rity, which are
correspondingly reflected in his spirit!al and physical e"istence
&t admonished me to reflect constantly on the Mishnahand re%!ed me
a%o!t speaing m!chPor thining of stray matters while praying# for
7ama=el and the serpent p!rs!e yo! in those tho!ghts, %!t yo! m!st %!rn
them with the straw of reciting the Shemaand the fire that iss!es from the
%reath of yo!r mo!th +MM FF.
CFOn the Aoharic myth=s identification of 7ama=el and the serpent as the male force of the Hother
side,I see Mishnat ha#zohar, , CC>, C?*0F)1# ershom 7cholem, HSitra#ahra2'he Hother sideI
good and evil in the Ka%%alahQ, idem9 n The Mystial Shape of the 5odhead, +6ew Gor
7chocen Boos -- *)0?/. Nf.MM *, -?, C/?, F?. 7ee also %elow, nn. C*, C/.
C>'his is %!t one of many e"amples of Karo living his life with reference to %oth the terrestrial
and the celestial congregations. 7ee, e.g.,MM FF, F?.
C
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
22/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
'hese congregations and a"es are constr!cted from the concepts of Aoharic world that
come to life in Karo=s vision. Karo=s perspective is infl!enced %y the d!alistic concept of
the Aohar=s a!thor, who !nam%ig!o!sly recogni$ed the metaphysical reality of evil and
saw the relationship %etween good and evil as an ongoing, irreconcila%le %attle %etween
opposing forces. 'he %attle is fo!ght on %oth the cosmic and the terrestrial planes, %y
means of the the!rgic elements in the performance of the commandments and the mystery
of intentions +%a&&anot and prayers. Nosmic evil is represented %y the fig!re of the
Hother sideI and his agents, 7atan and 7ama=el, who are !nderstood as %eings with ontic
reality and are represented in the evil imp!lse within the h!man psyche. Nosmic good is
represented %y the fig!re of the She%hinah, and her terrestrial em%odiment is in the 'orah,
theMishnah, prayer, and performance of the commandments. 'he forces of imp!rity and
sanctity are represented in h!man tho!ght and action, for performance of the
commandments is taen as a way of doing %attle against the Hother side.I Man=s psychic
world constit!tes a ey %attlefield in the d!alistic war, for a man fighting against his evil
imp!lse is there%y fighting against the Hother side.I Karo identifies the physical world
with metaphysical evil, with the reign of the Hother side,I with e"ile, and with the forces
of imp!rity that ho!nd a person. 3e accordingly sees the f!lfillment of physical needs as
yielding to 7ama=el, reinforcing e"ile, and casting the She%hinahinto the domain of the
qelippah. &nasm!ch as the tangi%le world, s!n in e"ile, is s!%5ect to the a!thority of the
forces of evil and of the qelippah, contact with it sho!ld %e avoided insofar as possi%le.
One m!st t!rn one=s %ac on its charms, withstand its infl!ence, and treat it with
indifference.C* 'he s!pernal world, in contrast, is identified %y Karo with the heavenly
C*On d!alism in the"ohar, see ershom 7cholem, n The Mystial Shape of the 5odhead, +6ew
Gor 7chocen Boos -- *)0?/# &dem.Ma+or Trends, C1*0C>F # 'ish%y,Mishnat ha#zohar,
CC
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
23/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
'emple and the s!pernal palaces, with the sanctity of the sacrificial c!lt, the world of the
sefirot, the celestial academies of the righteo!s, and the angels. 3e regards his
accomplishment as !nity with the She%hinah, as redemption, as offering sacrifices in the
heavenly 'emple, and as sanctification of od=s 6ame.C) 3e therefore strives to %rea
o!t of his personal e"istence, to %e raised %eyond the %o!ndaries of this world, to leave
the domain of the imp!re, and to reach the realm of the sacred and cleave to the s!pernal
worlds. 9s he sees it, %eing raised to the s!pernal is conditioned on s!ppressing
physicality# distancing oneself from the realm of the imp!re# self0mortification,
e:!animity, and self0p!rification# !ninterr!pted st!dy tied to the divine speech emanating
from within the te"t# constant %onding of one=s tho!ght to the divine via the letters,
words, and lang!age# and assigning a%%alistic significance and mystical content to
religio!s activity overall.
'his d!alistic concept of sanctity and imp!rity at war within his conscio!sness led
Karo to mystical self0mortification# he %elieved his %odily e"istence re:!ired penance
and p!rification, and that its only remedy was for his %ody to %e offered as a sacrifice and
his sins p!rged %y fire. &n his 5o!rnal he recorded the following martyrological promises
of the Maggid:H& have granted yo! the favor of %eing %!rnt for the sanctification of
od=s 6ame so that yo!r sins may %e atoned and yo! will %e raised !p, as & have told
yo!I +MM C/-# H3e said to me as well in inn!mera%le visions that & was destined to %e
, pp. C??0C-?# On the critical importance of this d!ality in the h!man so!l, see Rachel Elior,
H7o!l,I in =ontemporary Jewish ;eligious Thought, eds 9rth!r 9. Nohen and Da!l Mendes0
8lohr, +6ew Gor 7cri%ners -?/ ??/0?-). On alienation from the world and indifference to
reality, see %elow.
C)On associatively lined imagery of the s!pernal world, involving 'emple, altar, p!rity, %inding
+of a sacrifice, %!rnt offering, sacrifice, atonement, sanctification of od=s 6ame, s!pernal holy
%eings, and angels, seeMM*C, >-, *, )), F/-0F?.
CF
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
24/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
immolated for the sanctification of the 6ame of the 3oly One Blessed Be 3e, in order to
%e cleansed of my filth and sinsI +?C# HGo! will have the favor of %eing immolated for
the sanctification of od=s 6ame, where%y all yo!r g!ilt will %e entirely cleansed, and all
yo!r dross and decay will %e eradicated %y fireI +->.C/
Karo !nderstands the p!rpose of lifeat least from the mystical point of view
to %e immolation, there%y p!tting a final, a%sol!te end to the ego confined within his
C/ On preferring death, see MMF-, and see the disc!ssion %elow of sanctification of od=s
6ame. 9 possi%le so!rce for Karo=s e"treme self0mortifying position is 7olomon Molho=s
treatise, Sefer ha#Mefo)ar+7alonia, *C- 23e%rew4. 'he %oo identifies man=s physical needs
with sin, the fall, the evil imp!lse, and movement away from one=s spirit!al element# it
recommends e"treme self0mortification in order to ret!rn to one=s pre0sinning state +arsaw
edition, ??>, pp. C0*. Molho=s auto da f2reinforced the power of his words in the world of
si"teenth0cent!ry a%%alists, for his sanctification of od=s 6ame afforded a tragic reali$ation of
the ascetic, self0a%negating ideal directed toward revival of the sprit and death of the flesh. 'he
view that physicality is connected to the qelippahand that %odily pleas!re has its so!rce in the
Hother sideI %ro!ght a%o!t a way of life %ased on an ascetic ethos aimed at distancing oneself
from imp!rity %y p!tting the %ody to death and t!rning it into a sacrifice Hfor separating oneself
from pleas!res is effective in repelling the force of 7ama=elI +MM F?1# Hto inform yo! not to
p!rs!e meat and wine, which are the a%ode of the evil imp!lseI +C)># HEating is solely to
maintain the species and in all other respects it is from the realm of 7ama=el and the serpent, who
p!rs!e 2a man4 to do away with him and destroy himI +C/?. 'here is almost certainly a
connection %etween the prevalence in medieval Nhristian society of the ascetic, monastic ideal as
a condition for repairing an individ!al=s so!l and a %asis for individ!al and societal perfection and
its widespread internali$ation in ;ewish mystical circles. On the place of this concept in Nhristian
society, cf. ;ohan 3!i$inga, The 1utumn of the Middle 1ges, trans. Rodney ;. Dayton and lrich
Mammit$sch +Nhicago Nhicago niversity Dress, --), Nhapter C. entile ascetic and self0
mortifying practices are referred to favora%ly in Maggid Meisharim +MM C1>0C1*. On the
%acgro!nd for Nhristian loathing of the %ody, the connection %etween the material world and
metaphysical evil forged %y the powers of evil, and the conse:!ent spread of the concept of
a%stinence, see Lawrence Os%orne, The /oisoned 0mbrae: 1 6rief ,istory of Sexual /essimism
+6ew Gor Random 3o!se, --C# Elaine Dagels, 1dam9 0&e and Serpent +6ew Gor 6ew
Gor Random 3o!se-??.
C>
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
25/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
sinning physical conscio!sness and material %odily. 'he religio!s enterprise is directed
entirely to reali$ing that p!rpose. Karo lives his tr!e life in the s!pernal world# and
a%stinence is re:!ired of him so he may move from physical conscio!snessdependent
on the senses and tied to the realm of imp!rity and e"ile + de&equtwith 7ama=el and
falling to the qelippahto spirit!al conscio!sness dependent on mental foc!s and
constant reflection on od and 3is 'orah and tied to the realm of holiness and
redemption +de&equtwith the She%hinah, elevation to the heavens.
'he traits en5oined on Karo %y the She%hinahe:!animity, a%stinence, intense
self0mortification, negation of the materialconvey re5ection of the physical world and
estrangement from its val!es. 'hese ascetic positions reflect li%eration from the r!le of
the forces of evil, which em%ody destr!ction and e"ile, imp!rity and qelippah. 'hey also
reflect the premise that life is a process whose p!rpose is o%literating the self, attaining
nothingness, divesting of the physical, sanctification, and ret!rning to the so!rce of %eing.
B!t a%sol!te immersion in the world of tho!ght, in endless st!dy and the cleaving to the
divine realm inherent in it, %ecomes transformed into the mystical way that e"presses
!nification, raising0!p the She%hinah, constr!ction of worlds, sanctity and p!rity, and
redemption and the associated self0sacrifice. D!tting the %ody to deatha process
reflected in alienation from this world, yearning to sanctify od=s name# terminating the
sensory world# asceticism and a%stinence%rings a%o!t the spirit!al revival and mystical
elevation associated with !nification, co!pling, and de&equt. Dhysical eros, identified
with 7ama=el, the sym%ol of e"ile, is entirely cast aside and replaced with a mystical eros
of !nion and co!pling with the She%hinah, the sym%ol of redemption. Bringing the
"ohar=s tradition to life within his own %eing and internali$ing within his conscio!sness
C*
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
26/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
the fig!res and roles of Moses and Ra%%i 7imeon %ar Gohai%oth lined %y the Aoharic
tradition to the idea of mythic co!pling and mystical !nion with the She%hinahKaro set
that co!pling as his own goal, attaina%le thro!gh the death of the %ody, the elevation of
the so!l, and the redemption of the e"iled She%hinah.C?
Maggid Meisharimreflects its a!thor=s mystical way and the profo!nd infl!ence
of the Ka%%alah=s d!alistic conception of the world on his thining and his way of life.
'hro!gh dialog!e %etween theMaggidin its wealth of identities and Karo in his many
aspects, the %oo reveals and e"plicates the interdependence of the contrary forces within
his so!l and the vario!s parts of the a%%alistic cosmic reality. Moreover, it affords these
revelations and the practices derived from them the a!thority and force of a heavenly
so!rce and the power of a!thentic, directly reco!nted, h!man e"perience.
'he evidence strongly s!ggests that mystical !nion, as powerf!lly e"perienced
within Karo=s psyche and committed to writing in Maggid Meisharim in !nmediated
form, e"erted a critical infl!ence on Ra%%i &srael Ba# id., H,a#mashiah shel ha#zoharI 2'he Messiah in the"ohar4, in,a#ra(ayon ha#meshihi
be#yisra)el: yom iyyun le#regel melo)t shemonim shanah le#gershom shalom2The Messiani *dea
in Jewish Thought a day of st!dy in honor of ershom 7cholem=s eightieth %irthday4, ed. 7hm!el
Re=em +;er!salem, -?C -0-> 23e%rew4.
C)
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
27/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
almost no a!to%iographical wors, and the few that have come down to !s and attest
directly to their a!thors= mystical e"periences remain in man!script and have not %een
widely disseminated. ;oseph Karo=s 5o!rnal appears to %e the only a!to%iographical
mystical wor printed in the seventeenth cent!ry and availa%le to the teachers who
shaped the 3asidic mystical viewpoint d!ring the first half of the eighteenth cent!ry.C-
Maggid Meisharim'nd t&$ B$3"nn"n3# o- H'#"d"#)
7t!dents of Ka%%alah and 3asidism have long noted the infl!ence of 7afed
Ka%%alah on 3asidism=s concept!al world and have considered in general terms the lins
%etween 3asidic tho!ght and the world of Moses Nordovero +*CC */1, &saac L!ria
+*F> */C, Eli5ah de @idas +*>C *?*, Elie$er 9$ari +*FF )11, and other
a%%alists who lived in si"teenth0cent!ry 7afed. B!t no detailed comparison %etween
specific thiners of the two periods has %een cond!cted as yet, and the definitive
contri%!tion to 3asidic tho!ght of ;oseph Karo +>?? */*, who preceded the
foregoing Ka%%alists and ta!ght several of them, has not yet %een e"amined. Moreover,
the mystical !nderpinnings of the Ba
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
28/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
E"amination of the traditions that convey the spirit!al world of 3asidism=s
fo!nder, Ra%%i &srael Ba?> 23e%rew4# Ben Aion Jin!r, H;eishitah shel ha#hasidut &i#
yesodotehah ha#sozialiyyim &e#ha#meshihiyyimI 2'he origins of 3asidism and its social and
messianic elements4, in6e#mifneh ha#dorot29t a t!rning point in history4 +;er!salem, -/C ?0
C-) +first p!%lished in "ion ?01 2->F0->*4 23e%rew4# ershom 7cholem, H'emuto ha#
historit shel rabbi yisra)el ba(al shem to&I 2'he historical image of Ra%%i &srael Ba
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
29/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
with respect to their so!rces. B!t while he never e"plicitly acnowledged his de%t to
Maggid Meisharim, a comparative st!dy of Karo=s mystical tho!ght and the 3asidic
worldview, gro!nded in traditions cited in the Besht=s name, clearly shows the cr!cial
role played %yMaggid Meisharimin shaping the spirit!al world of 3asidism=s fo!nder.
Evidence from the //1s and /?1s shows that Maggid Meisharimwas nown within the
circle of the Besht=s followers#Fand an analysis of the Besht=s statements shows clearly
F 8or evidence of the place of Maggid Meisharimin the 3asidic tradition tied directly to the
Besht, see Mesh!llam 8ei%!sh 3eller of A%ara$h, Liqqutim !eqarim+;er!salem, -F> 2Lem%erg
/-C4 /% 23e%rew4 +the /-C edition was censored, to the point of entire pages %eing deleted#
the material appears in f!ll in editions dated ?11 or later# id., !osher 'i&rei 0met+Broolyn,
-/> *% 23e%rew4. 3eller=s acco!nt was written in the //1s and pertains to the tradition a%o!t
the Besht stemming from theMaggidof Aloc$ow and theMaggidof Me$hritch. 7ee also Moses
3ayyim Ephraim of 7idliov, 'egel Mahaneh 0frayim +;er!salem, -)F 2Koret$ ?14
+hereafter 'egel Mahaheh 0frayim C1/, ? 23e%rew4# these acco!nts were written in the
/?1s. 9 3asidic prayer %oo written in Mins in //- cites n!mero!s practices and teachings
fromMaggid Meisharimin the name of the angel, the Maggid. 'he prayer is rife with statements
along the lines of Hthe Maggid told o!r master Ra%%i ;oseph Karo that he sho!ld read an
a%ridgment of,o&ot ha#Le&a&ot, %eca!se;eishit ,o%hmahhad not yet %een writtenI +1?% or
Hthe Maggid told o!r master Ra%%i ;oseph Karo, may his memory %e for a %lessing, that he
sho!ld read a chapter ofMishnahat his ta%leI +/*a. 'he prayer %oo is now in the possession of
Drof. 7imon 9%ramsy of London, and & am gratef!l to Drof. 9%ramsy for calling it to my
attention and gracio!sly allowing me to e"amine it. On the importance of Maggid Meisharimin
3asidic circles, see ms. 6ational Li%rary in ;er!salem ?UF/*-, ))%0)/a H3is st!dents 2those of
Ra%%i Dinhas of Koret$4 wrote in his name that he considered the 6eit !osef=s %oo Maggid
Meisharimto %e a great and important wor, that its words were of heavenly origin, and that it
sho!ld certainly %e esteemed# the %oo almost never left his ta%le. Nf. 9%raham ;osh!a 3eschel,
HLe#toledot rabbi pinhas mi#qorezI 2On the %iography of Ra%%i Dinhas of Koret$4, in 1lei ayin:
minhat de&arim le#sh#z shoqen2Essays in honor of 7h. A. 7chocen4 +'el 9viv 3aaret$ -*C
* 23e%rew4. 'he wide availa%ility of Maggid Meisharimacross Eastern E!rope is evident
from the references to it in vario!s 3asidic te"ts composed aro!nd the time of the Besht=s death.
7ee, e.g., ;aco% ;oseph of Dolonnoye, "afenat /a(aneah+Koret$, /?C 23e%rew4# id, "afenat
/a(aneah, ed. edaliah 6igal +;er!salem Machon le3eer 7ifr!t 3asidit, -?-, ?Ca 23e%rew4#
C-
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
30/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
that he himself new of the %oo, as we shall see %elow. 'he Besht considered himself a
mystical innovator who, witho!t relying on h!man teachers, disseminated a new doctrine
of s!pernal origin,FCand he seems to have so!ght heavenly confirmation for his novel
ideas and to have identified with the e"plicit reliance on a higher so!rce reflected in
Maggid Meisharim. &n general terms, one may say that the intimate conversation carried
on inMaggid Meisharim%etween Karo and the angel speaing within him was the %asis
relied on %y the Besht in form!lating the mystical entity that shaped the early 3asidic
worldview. 'he ascetic practices and ecstatic g!idance encompassed in this heart0to0
heart conversation, cond!cted in first0person and second0person sing!lar d!ring the
second third of the si"teenth cent!ry, served as the inspiration for the mystical 3asidic
practices cited in the Besht=s name in the third person pl!ral d!ring the second third of
the eighteenth cent!ry. 'he difference is not simply one of genre, in that a 5o!rnal %y the
edaliah %en &saac of Linit$, Teshu)ot ,en+;er!salem 7olomon -)* 2Berdichev, ?)4 **
23e%rew4. On the place of Maggid Meisharimin Aloc$ow 3asidism d!ring the //1s, see Mor
9ltsh!ler, HMishnato shel rabbi meshullam feibush heller u#meqomah be#reishit ha#tenu(ah ha#
hasidit 2'he teachings of Ra%%i Mesh!llam 8ei%!sh 3eller and its place in early 3asidism4,
doctoral dissertation, 3e%rew niversiy in ;er!salem, --*, *0), ?F0?/, 1>01-, -0C1, -0
-F, CF*0C>C +hereafter 9ltsh!ler,Meshullam 4eibush. On the infl!ence ofMaggid Meisharim
on the 7eer of L!%lin d!ring the ??1s, see Rachel Elior, HBetween Gesh and 9yin 'he Joctrine
of the Aaddi in the ors of ;aco% &saac, 'he 7eer of L!%lin,I in Jewish ,istory: 0ssays in
,onour of =himen 1brams%y, eds. 9da Rapoport09l%ert and 7teven. ;. Aipperstein +London
Deter 3al%an, -?? F-F0>**.
FC'he Besht, as is widely attested in 3asidic literat!re, considered the %i%lical prophet 9hiyah the
7hilohite to %e his teacher. 7ee ;aco% ;oseph of Dolonnoye, 'oledot Ga
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
31/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
nat!re of things is written in first person sing!lar, while doctrines and practices %ased on
disciples= reports of their master=s statements, !nderstood as directed to all, will
accordingly %e written in second or third person. &t flows, rather, from the different
circ!mstances in which these mystical traditions came to %e and the different areas to
which they applied. Karowho %ro!ght the a%%alistic0Aoharic myth to life within
himself as a comple" dialog!e %etween himself and the s!pernal worlds, and who saw
himself in the image of Mosesso!ght the mystical0ascetic way of life within himself
and generally involved no one else directly. 'he Besht, on the other hand, saw himself
in the image of Ra%%i 7imeon %ar Gohai who had assem%led a circle of st!dents who
constit!ted a Qholy gro!pQ for the sae of mystical !nion. '!rning to the assem%led
mem%ers of his circle and seeing !nmediated contact with heavenly entities thro!gh the
inspiration of Karo=s 5o!rnal and of other vol!mes of mystical and hagiographic literat!re
composed in 7afed, the Besht instilled in the mem%ers of his gro!p, his Htreas!red onesI
+anshei segulato, the concept of the world he had ac:!ired thro!gh his mystical
e"perience. 3e therefore cast the re:!irements of the mystical ethos in the pl!ral rather
than the sing!lar.
Maggid Meisharim and the traditions attri%!ted to the Besht are connected %y
more than concept!al matters, :!otations, and te"t!al similarities. Karo and the Besht
were two mystics who were conscio!s of having %roen thro!gh the %o!ndaries of space
and time as the passageways %etween heaven and earth opened !p %efore them and the
mystical te"t came to life in their vision# and their distinctive connection was one of
identification and incorporation, internali$ation and inspiration. 'he %asic mystical
concepts of Maggid Meisharim, which their a!thor !nderstood to %e gro!nded in
F
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
32/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
heavenly revelation, %ecame ey concepts in the traditions cited in the Besht=s name, also
e"pressly attri%!ted to a heavenly so!rce.
8or %oth Karo and the Besht, these concepts are connected to the lin with the
She%hinah, referred to in the mystical tradition as Hthe world of speechI +olam ha#
dibbur. &n their minds= eyes, the She%hinahspeas with them thro!gh their mo!ths,
taling a%o!t her !nion and her redemption# she sees in them agents charged with
elevating her %y means of st!dy for her sae, adhering to her, and prom!lgating a new
mystical ethos directed toward her redemption. 'heir mystical e"periences are shaped %y
their tie to the a%%alistic myth regarding the She%hinah=s fate and %y their
interdependence with the She%hinah, as she speas thro!gh h!man mo!ths. 9ccording to
this myth, a h!man %eing plays a critical role in the %attle %etween sanctity and imp!rity
and in the raising of the She%hinah from her imprisonment# and he does so %y
recogni$ing the divine essence of h!man tho!ght and its analog!es in Hthe world of
speechI or %y means of the lin %etween the redeeming tho!ght and the redeemed
She%hinah. 'hese concepts flowed from Karo=s inner world, which drew on the
a%%alistic tradition that he e"perienced in !nmediated form in his mind=s eye, and they
appeared anew in the Besht=s statements, where they are cited as g!idance and practices
directed to others as well as to himself.
Maggid Meisharim=s mystical concept of the divine, which post!lates a d!al
realityod e"ists %oth in a personified form having a palpa%le presence in the h!man
so!l and in an a%stract form, f!nctioning in a mystical, mythological !niversecan %e
seen as well in the !nderpinnings of the 3asidic concept of the divine, which recogni$es
FC
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
33/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
the She%hinah as an !nmediated, palpa%le presence e"isting side %y side with a
transcendental, dialectical divine entity.
hat appears to have infl!enced the Besht more than anything else, however, is
the power of the !nmediated mystical e"perience that is evident on every page of Maggid
Meishariman e"perience n!rt!red %y the so!l=s deepest, !nconscio!s recesses and %y
the a%%alistic te"t!al tradition seen in a new light. &t is the a!to%iographical acco!nts in
Karo=s 5o!rnal that mediated %etween the written mystical tradition and the living
sensation welling !p within the Besht=s so!l and that transformed the te"t into a point of
depart!re for a new mystical e"perience.
'he Besht, lie Karo, saw himself as %elonging to the s!pernal world, as one
sit!ated a%ove nat!re and living in direct 5!"taposition to s!pernal %eings. 3e descri%ed
his distinctive :!ality all!sivelyHas one who cond!cts himself on a s!pernat!ral
levelIFF%!t regarded himself e"plicitly as having an !nmediated connection to the
s!pernal worlds. Evidence for this can %e fo!nd in his a!to%iographical writings in
*ggeret ha#7odesh+'he Epistle of 3olinessF>and in the acco!nts of his disciples and
FFToledot !a(aqo& !izhaq,Mishpatim, *)% +;er!salem, -/F C1- 23e%rew4.
F>On the vario!s versions of*ggeret ha#7odesh, see Shi&hei ha#6esht, facsimile of the ms., ed
Gehosh!a Mondschein +;er!salem-?C CC-0CF- 23e%rew4. 8or English translation of the epistle
see Lo!is ;aco%s, Q'he Mystical Epistle of the Baal 7hem 'ovQ, Jewish Mystial Testimonies,
+6ew Gor 7chocen Boos -// >?0**. On how it was !nderstood in later 3asidic tradition,
see Menahem Mendel 7hneerson 2the "emah "edeq4, Sefer dere%h emunah ha#niqra sefer ha#
haqirah +Daltava, -C )*# Gi$ha: &$a of Kamarna, Cozeir ,esed
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
34/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
relatives who :!ote from his remars.F* 'his charismatic connection appears to have
%een formed %oth %y the inspiration of the She%hinah=s revelation to Karowhich the
Besht identified with and internali$edand %y the inspiration of the hagiographical
traditions a%o!t Ra%%i &saac L!ria +Hthe 9riI, which had served as a model for mystical
practice from the time they were p!%lished at the %eginning of the seventeenth cent!ry.F)
F*9 well nown acco!nt of how the Besht was regarded %y his contemporaries appears in the
words of Ra%%i Me=ir Margolis of Ostrog H8rom my yo!th, from the day & came to now the
%ond of love with my teacher, my friend, o!r master, o!r teacher Ra%%i &srael, may his memory
%e %o!nd in the %onds of life, & new faithf!lly that his practices were those of holiness, p!rity,
great piety and a%stinence# and his wisdomthe righteo!s lives thro!gh his faithwas revealed
to him %y Metatron, 2an eminent angel in mystical literat!re associated with angelic mentors. 7ee
a%ove n. 14 the glory of od, a hidden matterI +Sod !a%hin u#6o)az2Ostrog, /->4 )a 23e%rew4.
On the charismatic way in which his disciples saw him and his a%ility to pierce the %o!nds
%etween 3eaven and earth, cf. the comments of ;aco% ;oseph of Dolonnoye H8or my master
engaged in ascents of the so!l and saw how 2the angel4 Michael, the great g!ardian of &srael,
advocated on &srael=s %ehalfI +Toledot !a(aqo& !osef, part C,'e&arim, p. )># H8or & heard from
my master 2the Besht4 that they showed him and led him %eneath the tree of nowledge of good
and evilPand afterward that they led him !nder the tree of lifePand then %ro!ght him into the
inner arden of EdenI +6en /orat !osef 2;er!salem, -/4 /% 23e%rew4. 7olomon of L!t$
cites the words of his teacher, the Maggidof Me$heritch, regarding the latter=s teacher, the Besht
H& heard from his holy mo!th, why are yo! s!rprised that he e"perienced the revelation of 2the
prophet4 Eli5ah and attained other 2incidents of4 very high stat!sIsee Jov Ber of Me$heritch,
Maggid 'e&ara& le#!a(aqo& +Koret$ /?, introd!ction 23e%rew4# id., Maggid 'e&ara& le#
!a(aqo&, ed. R. 7hat$0ffenheimer +;er!salem Magnes Dress -/), introd!ction to the %oo, 2C4
23e%rew4. 3is e"traordinary self0perception is evident from the words of his grandson H& heard
from the late ra%%iP;aco% ;oseph ha0Kohen may his memory %e a %lessing in the life of the
world to come, who heard from my master, my grandfather, may his memory %e a %lessing in the
life of the world to come, that sometimes the world e"ists in an e"alted state and sometimes the
world e"ists in a degraded state, and now that & am in the world, the world e"ists in an e"alted
state# th!s far the words of my master, my grandfather, may his memory %e a %lessing in the life
of the world to come,I id., CC. 8or additional acco!nts regarding his mystical conscio!sness and
F>
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
35/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
'he a!to%iographical and hagiographic mystical tradition reappeared and was
revived in the Besht=s conscio!sness, there !ndergoing a vis!al and e"periential
metamorphosis, as is evident in the Besht=s comments a%o!t himself to his grandson,
Ra%%i Ephraim of 7edliov. &n interpreting the verse Hwho shall ascend heavenward for
!sI +Je!t. F1C, the Besht said H3ere & swear to yo! that there is a man in the world
self0perception as one who ascended heavenward, see id., C?C and cf. *ggeret ha#7odesh 2'he
3oly Epistle4. 8or acco!nts of his mystical image, cf. 9aron %en Aevi ha0Kohen of Aelechow,
Keter Shem To&+Broolyn Kehot -? 2Aolov, /->4, pp. >1, >C, >/, /), 1) 23e%rew4.
F)'he H,aqdamah le#sha(ar ha#haqdamotI 2&ntrod!ction to the preliminary section4 that opens
3ayyim @ital=s0iz ,ayyim, 2tree of life4 a wor portraying the mystical fig!re of Ra%%i &saac
L!ria and written from an eye0witness=s point of view, e"ercised a s!%stantial infl!ence on the
shaping of the Besht=s mystical image as reflected in Shi&hei ha#6esht. 7ee 3ayyim @ital, 0tz
,ayyim+Koret$, /?C 23e%rew4. 'he wor, to %e s!re, was not printed !ntil twenty0two years
after the death of the Besht, %!t it is not at all impossi%le that the Besht had man!scripts of it
availa%le to him. Meanwhile, L!rianic hagiographic literat!re e"ercised a decisive infl!ence on
the shaping of the Besht=s self0conscio!sness. 'he literat!re originated with the letters of Ra%%i
7hlomil of Jresnice sent from 7afed to the Jiaspora in )1/0)1- and printed in ;oseph 7olomon
Rofe of Nandia, Ta(alumot ,o%hmah +Basilia, )C-. Nf. ;oseph Jan, HLe#toledotehah shel
Fsifrut ha#she&ahim=I 2On the history of hagiography4, Mehqerei yerushalayim be#folqlor yehudi
2;er!salem st!dies in ;ewish follore4, +-? ?C011 23e%rew4. On L!rianic hagiographic
literat!re and the associated %i%liographical and chronological disp!tes, see Meir Benayah!,
Toledot ha#ari2Life of &saac L!ria4 +;er!salem Mahon %en Aevi -)/# ershom 7cholem,
Kabbalah+;er!salem Keter -/> ># 'amar, Meharim +a%ove, n. C ))0-F# &saiah 'ish%y,
H,a#immut bein qabbalat ha#ari le#qabbalat ha#ramaq bi#%heta&a& u#&e#hayya& shel rabbi
aharon bera%hyah mi#modinaI 2'he conflict %etween L!rianic Ka%%alah and the Ka%%alah of
Moses Nordovero in the writings and life and Ra%%i 9aron Berahiah of Modena4, "ion F-
+-*> ?10?F + id.,,iqrei qabbalah u#sheuihotehah27t!dies in Ka%%alah and its ramifications4,
2;er!salem Magnes Dress -?C4 //0C*> 23e%rew4# and see id., ?10?C. 7cholarly views are
divided on the connection %etween Shi&hei ha#ariand Toledot ha#ari. Benayah!=s arg!ment for
the greater anti:!ity of the latter cannot withstand critical e"amination, %!t there is no do!%t that
from the seventeenth cent!ry on, vario!s versions of these te"ts were widespread and well
F*
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
36/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
who hears 'orah from the mo!th of the 3oly One Blessed Be 3e and 3is She%hinah.IF/
'hese words, which all!sively transform him into a fig!re lie Karo, who also heard
'orah from the mo!th of the She%hinah, s!pplement his well0nown acco!nt, in *ggeret
ha#7odesh, of the 'orah he learned from the mo!th of the Messiah and from his heavenly
teacher, the prophet 9hiyah the 7hilohite. *ggeret ha#7odeshprovides a clear e"ample of
the internali$ation of earlier mystical traditions# for even tho!gh it is presented as a
a!dio0vis!al revelation granted to the Besht in the s!pernal worlds, it recalls wording in
Maggid Meisharim, Shi&hei ha#1ri, and the"ohar. &t attests to the Besht=s inclination to
weave his mystical e"periences into the a%alistic fa%ric and to intertwine earlier mystical
concepts with the novel ones of his visions. &t appears that the Besht, in his mind=s eye,
even appropriates the revelations of Karo=sMaggidas his own, and the fo!ndations of the
mystical worldview held %y the a!thor ofMaggid Meisharim%ecome transformed into
the !nderpinnings of his own world. 'he Besht=s profo!nd identification with Karo=s
a%%alistic image gave him an e"traordinary a%ility to penetrate and empathi$e with
Karo=s world and set !p the mystical model %y whose light he gro!nded his own concept.
B!t while theMaggid=s words pertained directly only to Karo=s own life, the words of the
Besht, Hwho hears 'orah from the mo!th of the 3oly One Blessed Be 3e and his
She%hinah,I %ecome a to!chstone for anyone who is mystically inclined, witho!t
limitation.
Karo and the Besht lived their lives in entirely different circ!mstances. 'he well0
%orn scion of a prominent family, Karo was raised in the traditional manner of a yo!ng
nown, for they were printed in vario!s editions. &t is of co!rse possi%le that the Besht was aware
of other mystical %iographical so!rces in ms. form, s!ch as 3ayyim @ital=s Sefer ha#hezyonot, %!t
this cannot %e nown with any certainty %eca!se the distri%!tion of mss. cannot %e determined.
F/'egel Mahaneh 0frayim, C?C
F)
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
37/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
'orah scholar. 'he Besht, on the other hand, was a nameless orphan who grew !p with
no formal ed!cation and no social str!ct!re. Karo attained his stat!re %y reason of his
e"traordinary halahic scholarship, while the Besht was disting!ished %y his mystical
inspiration. B!t despite their ma5or differences of time, place, social standing, and
scholarly talent, their mystical worlds had m!ch in common, and %oth drew on the
a%%alistic tradition that c!t thro!gh %o!ndaries of time and place to !nite the divine
Hworld of speechI with the h!man world of speech, the terrestrial world with the
heavenly. 'he mystical tradition, centered as they saw it on the myth of the fate of the
She%hinahHworld of speech,I gave rise to a comprehensive ethos that shaped a%%alistic
pietism in 7afed in the si"teenth cent!ry and the Besht=s 3asidism in the eighteenth
cent!ry. Both were centered on the world of Hspeech, tho!ght, and actionI and on
lang!age that, in its vario!s forms, %ridges heaven and earth and forges a living
contin!!m %etween the mythic past and the mystical present. Both e"perienced the
transition from written myth to living mystical reality and the !nmediated connection to
the heavenly world. &t is no s!rprise, therefore, that the %asic mystical concepts of
Maggid Meisharim%ecame ey concepts in the traditions attri%!ted to the Besht. 'he
a%%alistic tho!ght constr!ct that connects redemptive h!man tho!ghts to the redeemed
She%hinah!nderlies %oth of these mystical traditions. &n what follows, we shall see in
detail how the %asic concepts of 3asidismmahsha&ah+Htho!ghtI, de&equt+QdevotionQ,
Hadhesion to odQ, Qcomm!nion with odI, hishta&ut +He:!animityI, a&odah ba#
gashmiyut+Hservice 2of od4 thro!gh the physicalI middat ha#bitahon+Hthe :!ality of
tr!stIQ Qconfidence in divine providenceQ, mesirat nefesh+Hdedication,I self0sacrifice,
qiddush ha#shem+Hsanctification of od=s 6ame,I HmartyrdomI,yihud+H!nificationI,
F/
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
38/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
and hitpashtut ha#gashmiyut+Hdivesting oneself of physicalityItoo shape and were
form!lated !nder the infl!ence and inspiration ofMaggid Meisharim.
B!t despite the clear concept!al and ling!istic resem%lance %etween the traditions
attri%!ted to the Besht and the Maggid Meisharim, it remains necessary to consider
whether the Besht in fact drew his own forms of mystical e"perience and concepts
directly fromMaggid Meisharimor whether the resem%lance %etween their e"periences
and their ideas means only that %oth fig!res drew on a common te"t!al tradition. 'he
premise of direct infl!ence appears to %e the more liely, for the a!to%iographical mar
of the earlier fig!re can %e seen clearly in the %iography of the latter. e shall see %elow
how the Besht was infl!enced %y the a!to%iographical, concept!al, and e"periential
totality of Maggid Meisharim, identifying with the a%%alistic tradition tied to the
She%hinah=s redemption and with the mystical e"perience tied, in an !nmediated manner,
to a living, eternal, non0temporal fig!re. 'he Besht seems to have regarded himself, to a
degree, as %earing Karo=s mystical image, inspired in its formation %y the fig!res of
Moses and of Ra%%i 7imeon %ar Gohai in the Aoharic myth. Lie Karo, the Besht saw
himself as a lin in the mystical chain of fig!res %ridging the earthly and celestial realms
and acting %eyond the %o!ndaries of time and space.
H)'n T&o3&t 'nd It# Conn$!t"on to R$d$)%t"on o- t&$ S&$*&"n'&
Maggid Meisharimassigns first0order significance to h!man tho!ghtthe %ridge
%etween the earthly and the celestial worlds and the arena in which the changes in
conscio!sness demanded %y mystical service are played o!t. Karo=sMaggid=s revelation
esta%lishes, for the first time in ;ewish mystical tho!ght, the %asic premise that identifies
F?
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
39/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
contemplative tho!ght with mystical de&equt. 'heMaggiddescri%es the transformation
from tho!ght to de&equt HOf necessity, the place yo! thin of constantly is where yo!
adhere toI +MM F-. 'his linage %etween h!man tho!ght and the s!pernal worlds is
infl!enced %y the Aoharic tradition that thesefirahof mal%hut+sovereignty is referred to
as tho!ght +mahsha&hah, as are the &nfinite +ein sof, the s!pernal crown +%eter elyon,
wisdom +ho%hmah, and !nderstanding +binah.F?
'he Besht liewise adopts that identification as an a"iom, as is made evident %y
the a!thor of Keter shem to&, who collected the :!otations of the Besht=s words that
appear in the writings of his preeminent st!dent, ;aco% ;oseph of Dolonnoye Hwherever a
person thins, that is where he adheres to.IF- 'he ra%%i of Dolonnoye adds H& heard
e"pressly from my teacher that wherever a person thins, that is where he is in his
F? 7ee Tiqqunei ha#"ohar, Tiqqun- +ed. Re!ven Margaliot, ;er!salem Mossad haRav Koo
-//. Nf. Moshe Nordovero,/ardes ;immonim, Sha(ar-, Sha(ar 0r%hei ha#Kinuyyim, entry
for mahsha&ah. On de&equtinMaggid Meisharim, see er%lowsy,Karo *)0).
F-Keter Shem To& +Broolyn Kehot -? ), *?, / 23e%rew4# for a similar form!lation, see
Liqqutim !eqarim +Lem%erg, /-C. > 23e%rew4 and the statement is cited fre:!ently in the
Besht=s name in6en /orat !osef+a%ove, n. FC. On de&equt, cf. ershom 7cholem, H'e&e%ut or
Nomm!nion with od,Q ;e&iew of ;eligion > +->--*1 *0F-# Rep. in idem, The
Messiani *dea in Judaism9 +6ew Gor 7chocen Boos -/ F/)0>11# Rivah 7chat$0
ffenheimer, ,a#hasdiut %e#mistiqah 27uietisti 0lements in 0ighteenth =entury ,asidi
Thought4 +;er!salem Magnes Dress -)?, inde" s.v. de&equt 23e%rew4# Rachel Elior, The
/aradoxial 1sent to 5od+9l%any 6G 76G --F inde" s.v. de&equt# Mendel Diear$,6ein
idi)ologiyah li#mizi)ut2Between ideology and reality4 +;er!salem Mossad Biali --> *10/?
23e%rew4.
F-
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
40/81
-
8/10/2019 Elior Besh and Karo
41/81
Elior Besht and Karo Linsider translationincorporating RE comments
'he identity %etween tho!ght and de&eiqutis set forth as a general principle in
Maggid Meisharim H8or it is nat!ral that where one thins and reflects is where one=s
so!l adheresI +MM >1. 9 similar identification can %e fo!nd in :!otation from the
Besht cited %y ;aco% ;oseph of Dolonnoye H&n the name of my teacher & heard at length
%!t will write %riefly that wherever a person=s tho!ght is, that is where he himself is in his
entirelyso, too, spirit!ally# if he thins with his spirit, that is where his so!l is.I>C 'he
Besht=s grandson cites his position in similar terms HKnow that wherever a person=s
tho!ght is sit!ated, that is where he in his entirety is to %e fo!nd.I>F
Noncentrating one=s tho!ght on the divine %eingreferred to as yihud
+!nification or de&equt, or as !nification of h!man speech with the divine Hworld of
Tanya +7lavi