Eliminating occupational cancer

22
INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE . Edinburgh . UK www.iom- world.org Eliminating occupational cancer John Cherrie IOSH National Safety Symposium 2014 I want to ELIMINATE workplace cancer

description

My presentation at the IOSH National Safety Symposium, 7th and 8th September 2014. http://www.iosh.co.uk/Key-IOSH-events/National-Safety-Symposium.aspx

Transcript of Eliminating occupational cancer

Page 1: Eliminating occupational cancer

INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE . Edinburgh . UK www.iom-world.org

Eliminating occupational cancer

John Cherrie

IOSH National Safety Symposium 2014

I wantto

ELIMINATE workplace

cancer

Page 2: Eliminating occupational cancer

Summary…

• Workplace cancer has been a problem for some time

• How many people die from occupational cancer in Britain?

• What are the main causes?• What will the future hold?• Can we really eliminate

occupational cancer?

Page 3: Eliminating occupational cancer

Europe’s dirtiest factory…

• Malcolm Carhart died from lung cancer

• Fred Richards had bladder cancer and survived

• 300 other men who worked at the Phurnacite plant in South Wales had their health damaged by their work Mr Fred Richards

Page 4: Eliminating occupational cancer

This was a coal carbonization plant

Page 5: Eliminating occupational cancer

Mortality in the plant…

• We carried out a mortality study in the plant in 1987• 17 year follow-up• 620 men included

• Increased cancer mortality• Lung – about 1.5x the expected numbers• Stomach – 1.6x• Prostate – 1.5x• Bladder – 2.7x

• Non-melanoma skin cancer commonly reported

Page 6: Eliminating occupational cancer

Understanding the causes

• In 1981 Richard Doll and Richard Peto were commissioned by the US government to assess the relative importance of the “environment” in causing cancer

• Their aim was to identify the proportion of cancer that is preventable

Sir Richard Doll

Sir Richard Peto

Page 7: Eliminating occupational cancer

Attributable fractions…

About 4% (2 – 8%)

Page 8: Eliminating occupational cancer

Cancer burden in the UK…

• Designed to update Doll and Peto’s estimate for occupational cancer burden• Current burden (2010) • Future burden (to 2060+)

• Funded by HSE to inform policy• Method based on:

• Risk of Disease (relative risk from published literature)• Proportion of population exposed

• Estimation for IARC groups 1 (definite) and 2A (probable) carcinogens and occupational circumstances

Rushton L, Hutchings SJ, Fortunato L, et al. Occupational cancer burden in Great Britain. Br J Cancer 2012;107:S3–S7.

Page 9: Eliminating occupational cancer

Attributable fraction…

5.3% (4.6 – 6.6%)

Men = blueWomen = red

Page 10: Eliminating occupational cancer

Not all carcinogens are equally important

85% of the cancer cases come from the top ten chemical agents

Page 11: Eliminating occupational cancer

Some good news…

Creely KS et al. (2007) Trends in inhalation exposure--a review of the data in the published scientific literature. Ann Occup Hyg.; 51(8): 665-678.

Aerosols

Page 12: Eliminating occupational cancer

Some good news…

Creely KS et al. (2007) Trends in inhalation exposure--a review of the data in the published scientific literature. Ann Occup Hyg.; 51(8): 665-678.

Gases and vapours

Page 13: Eliminating occupational cancer

Burden should be decreasing…

• If exposure is decreasing then it seems likely that the future burden will also be lower

• Assumes • Risk is related to exposure• Prevalence of exposure is not increasing• The aging population is not

distorting the picture

Page 14: Eliminating occupational cancer

So what does the future hold?• We have estimated future cancer burden in Britain

for a range of interventions for a number of workplace carcinogens• AFs estimated for forecast years, e.g. 2010, 2020 …

2060• Assume 10-50 years latency for solid tumours e.g.

lung cancer, 0-20 years for leukaemia• Some past and some future exposure until 2060 • Workers at the beginning (2010) assumed to be of all

working ages• Workers recruited through employment turnover are

assumed to be only aged 15-24

Hutchings, S., Cherrie, J., van Tongeren, M., & Rushton, L. (2012). Intervening to Reduce the Future Burden of Occupational Cancer in Britain: What Could Work? Cancer Prevention Research. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0070

Page 15: Eliminating occupational cancer

Crystalline silica…

• Assessed baseline scenario• Introduction of new limit values:• 0.05 mg/m3 and • 0.025 mg/m3

• Improved compliance with limits:• From 33% • to 90%

Page 16: Eliminating occupational cancer

Silica – Cancer incidenceBaseline, 0.1 mg/m3, 33% compliance OEL = 0.05 mg/m3, 33% complianceOEL = 0.025 mg/m3, 33% compliance

Page 17: Eliminating occupational cancer

Silica – Cancer incidence

OEL =0.1 mg/m3, 90% compliance OEL = 0.05 mg/m3, 90% complianceOEL = 0.025 mg/m3, 90% compliance

Page 18: Eliminating occupational cancer

Silica – cancer incidence

Page 19: Eliminating occupational cancer

Silica – cancer incidence

Page 20: Eliminating occupational cancer

Successful interventions

Agent Intervention

Solar radiation Reduce time outdoors, wear suitable clothes, use sun screen

Diesel engine exhaust

90% comply with an OEL of 1 mg/m3

Shift work < 5-years night shift work for women

Asbestos 90% comply with an OEL of 0.001 fibres/ml

Welders Improved ventilation, wear respiratory protection

Page 21: Eliminating occupational cancer

Elimination…

• Focus on the top-ten carcinogens• Encourage more effective controls along

with more stringent enforcement• “Elimination” achieved when future

occupational cancer burden less than 0.1% of all cancer registrations

• Monitor exposure and undertake an assessment of future burden as a leading indicator

Page 22: Eliminating occupational cancer

Questions…