Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08...

19
Electronic Crash Capture and Submission (ECCS)

Transcript of Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08...

Page 1: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Electronic Crash Capture and Submission

(ECCS)

Page 2: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

What is ECCS

The ability of a police officer/agency to

electronically complete and submit a crash

form (UD-10)

Page 3: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Why

Electronic processing of a UD-10 provides significant benefits:

AccuracyTimelinessConsistencyCompleteness

Cost

Page 4: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Project

In 2007-2011 52 grants totaling $3.4 million have been awarded to police agencies

to provide for ECCS projects: LaptopsCrash softwareConnectivity Magstripe readersTraining

Page 5: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Agencies Since 2006, Michigan has increased the number of police agencies

collecting and submitting crash reports from 2% to over 60%.

2006-2011 AGENCIES x Submission Type

2.0% 2.6% 12.5%

39.3%

60.0% 62.0%

97.4%

87.5%

61.0%

40.0% 38.0%

98.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Electronic Paper

Page 6: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Crashes Since 2006, Michigan has increased the number of UD-10’s being

collected and submitted electronically from less than 1% to over 70%.

2006-2011 CRASHES x Submission Type

0.8% 2.5% 6.1%

21.6%

53.9% 55.0%

97.5%93.9%

78.4%

46.1% 45.0%

99.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Electronic Paper

Page 7: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2005 003

Page 8: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2006 013

Page 9: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2007 017

Page 10: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2008 082

Page 11: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2009 251

Page 12: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2010 392

Page 13: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2011 406

Page 14: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Accuracy Michigan Traffic Reporting System (TCRS) Edit Errors 2007-2015

1.75

1.55 1.52 1.521.46

1.41.33 1.29

1.24

0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

0.890.79 0.77 0.77 0.74 0.71 0.68 0.65 0.63

00.20.40.60.8

11.21.41.61.8

2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* 2012* 2013* 2014* 2015*

Years *Goals

Number of Edit Errors per Crash

Paper

Electronic

Paper v. Electronic Mean

Note: * Indicates a 4 %annual improvement ratefor a total of 18.5% at endof trend

Page 15: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Timeliness Michigan Traffic Crash Reporting System (TCRS) Mean Reporting Days

for Paper vs. Electronic Submissions 2007-2015

25.45 26.05 25.62

20.7319.9

19.118.34

17.6116.9

14.7113.23

10.67 11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2

20.08 19.6418.145

16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

*20

12*

2013

* 20

14*

2015

*

Years *Goals

Average Reporting

Days

Paper

Electronic

Paper vs. Electronic Mean

Page 16: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

ECCS-5 Tentative Timeline (based on funding availability)

• July 2011 – Request for letters of interest emailed to MSP Crime & Crash listserv

• August 2011 – Deadline for letters of interest

• September 2011 – Awards determined & OHSP e-grant applications completed

• October 2011 – ECCS grant activity begins

Page 17: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

BAC Reporting Grant

• Partnership with MADD National

• Increase Michigan’s BAC reporting in fatal crashes

• Michigan’s current reporting is 60%

Page 18: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

BAC Reporting Grant Results• UD-10 Contact person at each agency

• Alcohol & Drug Reporting Reference GuideThe UD-10 Contact form and reference guide can be found at http://www.michigan.gov/crash

• Training (Crash Trainer & MI-Train Webinar)http://mi.train.orgFARS - Alcohol and Drug ReportingCourse ID: 1025575

Page 19: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Traffic Records Contacts

UD-10 Training: Dean [email protected]

Traffic Crash Data Inquiries: Michael [email protected]

Traffic Records Grants: Alicia [email protected]

BAC Reporting: Lorie [email protected]