Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

19
1 in cooperation with Picture or Drawing 20.7 x 8.6 cm UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE. TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING. Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation Frits J.K. Buesink, Senior Researcher EMC [email protected] Funded by the European Union on the basis of Decision No 912/2009/EC, and identified in the European Metrology Research Program (EMRP) as Joint Research Project (JRP) IND60 EMC (2013-2016). Additional funding was received from the EMRP participating countries. UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE. TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING. in cooperation with Avoid interference in large installations The Current Boundary a provision to split loops (and shut out noise sources) “Ground 1” “Ground 2” I cm (noise current) loop closes through “ground” “Ground 2” “Ground 1” I cm loop closes through “ground” Create one or more “inner-loops” Short circuit(s) reduce loop area check Unit 1 Unit 2 (Mains cord 1) (Mains cord 2) (I/O cable 1-2) detector: AM-radio 2

Transcript of Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

Page 1: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

1

in cooperation with

Picture or Drawing 20.7 x 8.6 cm

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

Frits J.K. Buesink, Senior Researcher [email protected]

Funded by the European Union on the basis of Decision No 912/2009/EC, and identified in theEuropean Metrology Research Program (EMRP) as Joint Research Project (JRP) IND60 EMC (2013-2016).Additional funding was received from the EMRP participating countries.

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

The Current Boundary

a provision to split loops (and shut out noise sources)

“Ground 1” “Ground 2”

Icm (noise current)

loop closes through “ground”

“Ground 2”“Ground 1”Icm

loop closes through “ground”

Create one or more “inner-loops”Short

circuit(s)

reduce looparea

check

Unit 1

Unit 2

(Mains cord 1)(Mains cord 2)(I/O cable 1-2)

Situation in practicedetector:AM-radio

2

Page 2: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

2

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Install current boundaries at natural interfaces

edge of PCB, cabinet wall, basement of a building; one boundary per unit!

Right Wrong

Icm Icm

Drawbacks:

Current follows longpath over equipment

Loop area cannot easilybe minimized

3

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Examples of current boundaries on equipment

wide conductors and low-resistance transitions (be careful with paint) !

protect all units with a current boundary!(and check any conductor that passes it)

Short

Wid

e

check DC resistance witha milli- meter: < 1 m!

NoPaint!

4

Page 3: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

3

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Icm

Use Current Boundary to protect existing “pig-tail”

pig-tails can be acceptable as long as CM currents are kept away from it

H-fieldlines

Wide metal plate

(Current Boundary)

EMC glands5

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

If many Cables are Guided through Shielding Wall..

other options exist

6

Page 4: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

4

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with

Roxtec / Brattberg Glands

7Avoid interference in large installations

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Special Gland System: Many Cables Through Wall

all make good electrical contact in wall (< 10 m)

current boundary 3

Wal

l of

Eq

uip

men

t R

oo

m

MonitoringProbe

Analyserw. TrackingGenerator

Amplifier

InjectionProbe

Wal

l of

Eq

uip

men

t R

oo

m

MIL-STD-1310G

8

Page 5: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

5

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Next: Separate Cables with Current Boundaries

classify cables into categories

Model

ICM

Category

red = “source” =“Emission”

1. Noisy (E)

green =“sensitive” =“Immunity”

2. Sensitive (I)

blue =“indifferent” =

“Neutral”

3. Indifferent (N)

E

I N

9

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Model the Real System in CM loops

Both sensitive (analog, various busses) and (polluted) power lines

M3~

Process control system

powerelectronics

relay’s circuitbreakers

pumps,fans, drives

pneumatic/hydraulic

valves

sensorsProduction process / machine

Controlequipment

Power supply 10 kV/400 V

Industrial Environment

I/Omodule

controlequipmentPLC/PC/Ccontrol buscontrol bus

CP

U b

us

machine structure

Source: C.J. Post Lambda Engineering B.V.“EMC of Large Systems” PATO 2007

10

Page 6: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

6

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

1. herken kringN

Steps:

Separating Cables with Current Boundaries

use Neutral conductor to reduce loop area; then insert current boundary

1. recognize loop

E

I2. reduce looparea

N

3. add boundary

11

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Separating Cables with Current Boundaries

neutral conductor in practical cases: never a “wire”, always a structure part

cm

cross section:twin wires!

Emission Neutral

(CM-) Transfer impedance of combinationof two relatively thin conductors

is too high (radiates fields)(does not work for high frequencies)

12

Page 7: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

7

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Separating Cables with Current Boundaries

wide metal reduces fields i.e. the transfer-impedance of the cm-current loop

cm

advantage:proximity & skin

effects

Emission

Neutral

Wide sheet metal (“cable tray”) is far superiorto the previous situation. The common-mode

transfer impedance is much lower. Skin effect helps.

13

|

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Separating Cables (Alternative)

use structure metal parts to “guide” cables and insert current boundaries

NSteps:1. recognize loop

E

I

2. guide cables with metal strips or trays

3. connect current boundaries to strips

14

Page 8: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

8

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

“Plane” could be metal mesh

1. herken kring

Separating Cables with Current Boundaries

use (Ground-) Plane to reduce loop area; then insert current boundaries

NSteps:1. recognize loop

E

I

2. cover loop with metal (ground-)plane

3. connect current boundaries to plane

15

Note: we are actuallyreducing CM-loop areashere, using wide metal “short-circuits”

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with16Avoid interference in large installations

50

Experiment with Frequency Controlled Motor

crosstalk between cables due to transfer-impedance

Cable 1 (source)

(twin wires)

Cable 2 (passive)

50

DC Motor

PW

MC

ontr

olle

rm

ode

AC supply

Plastic support

Page 9: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

9

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with

Metal cable tray

17Avoid interference in large installations

50

Experiment with Frequency Controlled Motor

crosstalk between cables due to transfer-impedance

Cable 1 (source)

(twin wires)

Cable 2 (passive)

50

DC Motor

PW

MC

ontr

olle

rm

ode

AC supply

Plastic support

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Cable distance is important

once a cable tray is used for protection

H

D

proximity effect

closer cable“catches” more flux

18

Page 10: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

10

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Separating Regions using Current Boundaries

enclosures with current boundaries form individual “environments”

Region N

Region N+1

Top level (“outside”)Region 0

19

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Three Types of Current Boundary

Short Circuit for Common-Mode “Sources”

Enclosure / EMC Cabinet / Shielded Room

Environment Region “0”

Environment Region “1”

1. Connector Plate

3. CompletelyShielded

Enclosure

20

Page 11: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

11

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Regions/Environments can be Nested

prepare for current boundaries on every module interface

21

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Only Limited Shielding can be achieved per Enclosure

20 -40 [dB]; but it can be applied recursively!

In EMC terms,sometimes referred to as:Multipoint Grounding…

22

Page 12: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

12

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Regions are defined Electromagnetic Environments

(example) region 0: MIL-STD-464A, region 1: bridge, region 2: below deck

0

1

2

Aim: use commercial equipment in region 2 (susceptibility level 10 V/m)

Shielding between successive regions: 20 - 40 dB (factor 10 to 100)

Define where EM zones will be Define the EM levels per region Use adequate current boundaries between regions

23

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Multipoint Grounding

hierarchy of current boundaries

PCB withground plane

current boundary 1

current boundary 2

Cabinet with Back-plane

Connector Plate

on Cabinet Wall

24

Page 13: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

13

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Multipoint Grounding

separating rooms in a ship is called Zoning (partitioning into EM-Regions)

current boundary 2

current boundary 3

Cabinet Wall

Wall of Equipment Room

PCB 1 PCB 21

backplane 1

2

cabinet 1

3

room wall

4

cabinet 2

5

backplane 2

20 dB per boundary:= 100 dB!

25

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation withAvoid interference in large installations

Try to stick to the “Low Frequency Approach”

use current boundaries to restrain sizes to way below half-wavelength

Large ScaleLow Frequencies

Small ScaleHigh Frequencies

26

Page 14: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

14

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with27Avoid interference in large installations

“Systems Designers Heaven”

independent building blocks with “abstract” behaviour

System

Software

HardwareModules

Components

Object Oriented

realise complex from simpler behaviour

make assemblies independent

solve “undesired” as low as possible

EMC Principal Laws No high frequencies Do not transport them Use adequate boundaries

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with28Avoid interference in large installations

Product Development/Program Support

systems EMC requirements are set by the environment it is intended for

Ground BasedAirborne

At Sea

Industry

Domestic

Small

MediumLarge

[Tests to cover]

Page 15: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

15

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with29Avoid interference in large installations

EMC is achieved during the design process

when problems appear during testing, we are too late!

0

manyA

vaila

ble

Miti

gatio

n O

ptio

ns

Concept Design Manufacture Test Operational

Requirements

Measures

0

M$$

Cos

t of M

odifi

catio

n

Check bonding

Repair/redesign

Bankruptcy

phase in the lifecycle

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with

Example of a Large Organization: Thales

aerospace, defense, information technologies

30Avoid interference in large installations

In terms of EMC: How to keep the same quality standards all over the world?

Page 16: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

16

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with

Four Key Elements

of EMC implementation in large organizations

31Avoid interference in large installations

1. Awareness

2. Network

3. Rules & Guidelines

4. Program support

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with

Product Development/Program Support

perform engineering & qualification tests

32Avoid interference in large installations

http://www.thales-ecc.nl/onze-expertise/emc/

Page 17: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

17

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with33Avoid interference in large installations

EMC approach through the Knowledge Cycle

insert electro magnetic behavior up front

Problem definition:“desired behavior”

Research/Analyses

Behavioral Model

Validatedmodels

KnowledgeTransfer &Education

DevelopmentSupport

Validation/Verification

“Test”

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with

EMC Rules and Guidelines

a lot of information on EMC engineering can be found on the internet

34Avoid interference in large installations

Page 18: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

18

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with

EMC Rules and Guidelines

or: buy a book!

35Avoid interference in large installations

ISBN 978-0-470-18930-6

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with

End of Part II

36Avoid interference in large installations

Page 19: Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation

19

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

in cooperation with37Avoid interference in large installations

Relation of MIL-STD-461E tests to Phenomena

survey of test identifiers

CE102 Conducted Emissions, Power Leads, 10 kHz to 10 MHz

RE101 Radiated Emissions, Magnetic Field, 30 Hz to 100 kHz

RE102 Radiated Emissions, Electric Field, 10 kHz to 18 GHz

RE103 Radiated Emissions, Antenna Spurious and Harmonic Outputs, 10 kHz – 40 GHz

CS101 Conducted Susceptibility, Power Leads, 30 Hz to 150 kHz

CS114 Conducted Susceptibility, Bulk Cable Injection, 10 kHz to 200 MHz

CS116 Conducted Susceptibility, Damped Sinusoidal Transients, 10 kHz to 100 MHz

RS101 Radiated Susceptibility, Magnetic Field 30 Hz to 100 kHz

RS103 Radiated Susceptibility, Electric Field, 2 MHz to 40 GHz

RS105 Radiated Susceptibility, Transient Electromagnetic Field (NEMP)