Electrochemical Performance and Microbial Characterization from a Thermophilic Microbial Fuel Cell
description
Transcript of Electrochemical Performance and Microbial Characterization from a Thermophilic Microbial Fuel Cell
Electrochemical Performance and Microbial Characterization from a Thermophilic Microbial Fuel Cell
K.C. Wrighton1, P. Agbo1, F. Warnecke3, E.L. Brodie2, Y.M. Piceno2, K.A. Weber1, C. Chow1, T.Z. DeSantis2, G.L Andersen2, and J.D. Coates1
1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA
3 Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA
Abstract
Significant research effort is currently focused on microbial fuel cells (MFC) as a source of renewable energy. To date, most of these efforts have concentrated on MFCs operating at mesophilic temperatures. However, many previous studies have reported on the superiority of thermophilic conditions in anaerobic digestion and demonstrated a net gain in energy yield, in terms of methane, relative to the increased energy requirements of operation. Because of this, our recent studies on MFCs focused on investigating the operation and microbiology associated with thermophilic MFCs operating at 55°C. Over 100-day operation, these MFCs were highly stable and achieved a maximum power density of 24mW/m2 and a columbic efficiency of 89 percent with acetate as the sole electron donor. In order to characterize the microbial community involved in thermophilic electricity generation, DNA and RNA were isolated from the electrode. PhyloChip and clone library analyses were performed to describe anode bacterial community membership and dynamics. PhyloChip analysis using 16S rDNA and rRNA sequences revealed an increase in relative abundance of populations belonging to the Firmicutes and Chloroflexi by at least one order of magnitude in current producing reactors. Clone library analysis confirmed the dominance of Firmicutes and identified specific genera enriched only in current producing reactors. To better characterize the active microbial populations, we enriched and isolated novel Firmicutes, strain JR and strain S2E, from samples collected from an operating MFC. Based on 16S rRNA gene analysis strain JR was a member of the family Peptococcaceae clustering with Thermincola ferriacetica (>99 percent similarity) while strain S2E was a member of the family Bacillaceae clustering with Geobacillus (>98% similar to Geobacillus pallidus). Phenotypic characterization revealed that both strains were capable of thermophilic dissimilatory reduction of insoluble electron acceptors such as amorphous Fe(III); as well as reduction of the model quinone 2,6-anthraquinone disulfonate (AQDS). Thermincola strain JR was also capable of producing current by coupling acetate oxidation to anodic electron transfer. This represents the first organism isolated from a thermophilic microbial fuel cell and also the first Firmicute representative capable of independent anodic electron transfer. The results of this study indicate the potential advantages for thermophilic MFCs and the novel microbiology associated with their operation.
Reactor Design and Model
CEM
Acetate + 2H20
2CO2
+ 8H+
8e-4H2O
2O2 + 8H+
8e-e-
e-
e-
A microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a device that uses bacteria as catalysts to oxidize organic matter to generate current. In this MFC, bacteria in the sludge completely oxidize acetate to carbon dioxide and protons. In metabolizing the acetate, the bacteria subsequently liberate electrons from the acetate onto the graphite anode. Electrons then flow through an external circuit to the cathode where they combine with oxygen and protons that have diffused through the cation exchange membrane (CEM) from the anode.
ConclusionsThermophilic current production is sustainable over a 100 days
PhyloChip analysis using 16S rRNA and rDNA response identified members of the Firmicutes and Chloroflexi that increased by at least one order of magnitude only in electricity producing MFC
Firmicutes sequences dominated (74%) the 16S rDNA clone libraryspecifically sequences belonging to genera Alicyclobacillus, Bacillus, Geobacillus, and Thermincola were enriched only in current producing reactors
Thermincola strain JR and Geobacillus Strain S2E, members of the Firmicutes, can reduce solid phase iron as well as transfer electrons to the electrode
Thermincola Strain JR produces 0.181 mA of current independent of an electron shuttleGeobacillus Strain S2E produces 0.04 mA of current dependent on the addition of an exogenous electron shuttle
Together these results confirm the role of the Firmicutes in MFCs and expand the known role of Firmicutes to include both independent and dependent methods of current generation
Clone LibraryElectrochemical Performance
A total of six MFC reactors were constructed to evaluate thermophilic performance and microbiology. Three treatments (acetate amended, no electron donor control, and open circuit control) were applied with duplicate reactors. Shown below is representative current production from acetate and non acetate treatments.
Current was produced continually for 100 days in MFC amended with acetate, where MFCs lacking exogenous electron donor failed to produce current after 4 days
Duplicate reactors were functionally reproducible
Current Production for 100 Days
471 ohms internal resistance (Ri= -m; y=mx+b)
24.2 mW/m2 power density
89% of the electrons available in acetate were recovered as current
Electrochemical Characterization
A polarization is calculated by measuring potential and current changes across various external loads. It is used to calculate the internal resistance as well to describe the power as a function of current.
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mea
n P
oten
tial
(m
V)
Current (mA)
0
5
10
15
20
25
Mea
n P
ower
Den
sity
(m
W/m
2 )
y = 444.61 - 470.99xPower Density (mW/m2)
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mea
n P
oten
tial
(m
V)
Current (mA)
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mea
n P
oten
tial
(m
V)
Current (mA)
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
5
10
15
20
25
Mea
n P
ower
Den
sity
(m
W/m
2 )
y = 444.61 - 470.99xPower Density (mW/m2)y = 444.61 - 470.99xPower Density (mW/m2)
Acetate (mA)No Acetate (mA)
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Cur
rent
Pro
duct
ion
(mA
)
Time (d)
Acetate (mA)No Acetate (mA)Acetate (mA)No Acetate (mA)
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Cur
rent
Pro
duct
ion
(mA
)
Time (d)
.
Firmicute Isolates Capable of Electricity Generation
Geobacillus Strain S2E Characterization
Geobacillus strain S2E was isolated from a thermophilic MFC on solid phase iron and acetate
Gram positive, spore forming, obligately thermophilic rod belonging to class Bacillus, family Bacillaceae
Facultative anaerobe capable of fermentation as well as the reduction of solid phase iron and AQDS but cannot reduce soluble forms of iron (III), sulfate, chlorate, and perchlorate
Thermincola Strain JR Current Production
Thermincola Strain JR Characterization
Thermincola strain JR was isolated from a thermophilic MFC on AQDS and acetate
Gram positive and obligately thermophilic rod belonging to class Clostridia, family Peptococcaceae
Obligate anaerobe capable of reduction of solid phase iron and AQDS but cannot reduce soluble forms of iron (III), sulfate, chlorate, perchlorate, and nitrate
Geobacillus Strain S2E Current Production
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
-5 0 5 10 15 20
No exogenous shuttleControl: no acetate and no exogenous shuttle
The
rmin
cola
Cur
rent
Pro
duct
ion
(mA
)
Time (d)
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
-5 0 5 10 15 20
No exogenous shuttleControl: no acetate and no exogenous shuttleNo exogenous shuttleControl: no acetate and no exogenous shuttle
The
rmin
cola
Cur
rent
Pro
duct
ion
(mA
)
Time (d)
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Exogenous shuttleNo exogenous shuttleControl: no acetate and exogenous shuttle
Geo
baci
llus
Cur
rent
Pro
duct
ion
(mA
)
Time (d)
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Exogenous shuttleNo exogenous shuttleControl: no acetate and exogenous shuttle
Geo
baci
llus
Cur
rent
Pro
duct
ion
(mA
)
Time (d)
Strain JR generated a maximum of 0.181 mA (mean 0.1522 mA, n=3 ±0.025) without the presence of a mediator
Geobacter sulfurreducens 0.251 mA (n=3, ±0.04)
Shewanella putrefaceins IR-1 0.04 mA (n=3, ± not reported)
Strain S2E generated a small amount of current (0.04 mA) when provided with an electron shuttle
PhyloChip
Current Producing Community Structure
The high similarity between 16S rRNA and rDNA response from electricity producing anodes (distance between red and black labels in dark blue circle) signifies that the active community (rRNA) is similar to the persistent community (rDNA)
Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) distances are based on relative similarity; samples that are most similar will appear closer on the MDS map. A stress value = 0.01 indicates the MDS accurately reflects the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix.
Bacterial Dynamics
Members of the Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, and alpha Proteobacteria increased by at least one order of magnitude in relative abundance in rDNA response only in current producing reactors
Based on the enrichment of Firmicutes in rRNA and rDNA response, and the lack of enrichment of these OTUs in control reactor communities, strongly suggests Firmicutes play an active role in the current generating community
A 1000 unit change in hybridization intensity represents a one log change in relative abundance between the initial starting inoculum and the electrode community after 100 days of current production.
Cha
nge
in in
tens
ity
wit
h ti
me
-5000
-3000
-1000
1000
3000
5000
-
-
-
-
-
-Cyanobacteria
Verrucomicrobia
Chloroflexi
Chlorobia
Bacteroidetes
Actinobacteria
Proteobacteria•••••
•••••
Firmicutes•••
•••
AlphaBetaDeltaEpsilonGamma
BacillusClostridiaOther
Cyanobacteria
Verrucomicrobia
Chloroflexi
Chlorobia
Bacteroidetes
Actinobacteria
Cyanobacteria
Verrucomicrobia
Chloroflexi
Chlorobia
Bacteroidetes
Actinobacteria
Proteobacteria•••••
•••••
Firmicutes•••
•••
AlphaBetaDeltaEpsilonGamma
BacillusClostridiaOther
Proteobacteria•••••
•••••
Firmicutes•••
•••
AlphaBetaDeltaEpsilonGamma
BacillusClostridiaOther
AlphaBetaDeltaEpsilonGamma
BacillusClostridiaOther
Cha
nge
in in
tens
ity
wit
h ti
me
-5000
-3000
-1000
1000
3000
5000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-5000
-3000
-1000
1000
3000
5000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-5000
-3000
-1000
1000
3000
5000
-
-
-
-
-
-Cyanobacteria
Verrucomicrobia
Chloroflexi
Chlorobia
Bacteroidetes
Actinobacteria
Proteobacteria•••••
•••••
Firmicutes•••
•••
AlphaBetaDeltaEpsilonGamma
BacillusClostridiaOther
Cyanobacteria
Verrucomicrobia
Chloroflexi
Chlorobia
Bacteroidetes
Actinobacteria
Cyanobacteria
Verrucomicrobia
Chloroflexi
Chlorobia
Bacteroidetes
Actinobacteria
Proteobacteria•••••
•••••
Firmicutes•••
•••
AlphaBetaDeltaEpsilonGamma
BacillusClostridiaOther
Proteobacteria•••••
•••••
Firmicutes•••
•••
AlphaBetaDeltaEpsilonGamma
BacillusClostridiaOther
AlphaBetaDeltaEpsilonGamma
BacillusClostridiaOther
Bacteria electrode communities cluster by electricity production and not temporally
Unique bacterial community associated with current production
γ Proteobacteria
Firmicutes
α Proteobacteria
ε Proteobacteria
Chloroflexi
Ac 1DNA
Open DNA
Ac 2DNA
Ac 2cDNA
Ac 1cDNA
No Ac cDNA
No AcDNA
Time 0 DNA
Time 0 DNA
Time 0 DNA
γ Proteobacteria
Firmicutes
α Proteobacteria
ε Proteobacteria
Chloroflexi
γ Proteobacteria
Firmicutes
α Proteobacteria
ε Proteobacteria
Chloroflexi
Ac 1DNA
Open DNA
Ac 2DNA
Ac 2cDNA
Ac 1cDNA
No Ac cDNA
No AcDNA
Time 0 DNA
Time 0 DNA
Time 0 DNA
Ac 2DNA
Ac 2cDNA
Ac 1cDNA
No Ac cDNA
No AcDNA
No Ac cDNA
No AcDNA
Time 0 DNA
Time 0 DNA
Time 0 DNA
Hierarchical clustering to compare differences in overall community structure of anode communities and initial inoculum.
Initial InoculumCurrent ProducingNo Current Controls
Linking Bacterial Dynamics with Activity
Phylogenetic distribution of 42 OTUs identified by PhyloChip 16S rDNA analysis that increase by one log in relative abundance.
Firmicutes (16)Proteobacteria (8)Chloroflexi (5)
Cyanobacteria (3)Planctomycetes (2)AD3 (1)Chlorobi (1)Lentisphaearae (1)OP10 (1)OP9/JSI (1)Spirochaetes (1)Termite Group 1 (1)
Chloroflexi
UnclassifiedThermomicrobiaChlroflexi-4Chloroflexi-3
Proteobacteria02468
1012141618
GammaDeltaAlpha
Firmicutes
SymbiobacteriaDesulfotomaculumUnclassifiedBacilliClostridia
Firmicutes (7)Chloroflexi (3)
Proteobacteria (1)Planctomycetes (1)Chlorobi (1)Termite Group 1 (1)
FirmicutesDesulfotomaculumClostridiaBacilli
Chloroflexi
UnclassifiedThermomicrobiaAnaerolineae
012345678
ProteobacteriaDelta
Phylogenetic distribution of 14 OTUs identified by PhyloChip 16S rRNA analysis that increase by one log in relative abundance.
Current Production
Initial Inoculum
No Current Controls
Clusters are >87% similar (Bray-Curtis Similarity)
Acetate
No Acetate
Acetate
Open
Acetate
No Acetate
Acetate
Inoc.
Inoc.
DNARNA
Inoc.
Identification of Dominant BacteriaA maximum likelihood tree showing phylogenetic position of 16S rDNA clones generated from current producing electrodes. A total of 302 clones were sequenced representing 25 OTUs which are indicated in bold. Values in parentheses indicate number of clones from each OTU. Sequences from electrode biofilm isolates are also included on the tree and are denoted in red. The scale bar represents 0.1 inferred nucleotide changes per 100 substitutions.
Firmicutes sequences are enriched (77% of clones) only in clone libraries constructed from current generating reactors
Dominant Firmicute genera
Bacillus sp. (81 OTUs, 27%)
Alicyclobacillus sp. (73 OTUs, 24%)
Thermincola sp. (65 OTUs, 22%)
In contrast to the Firmicutes, Coprothermobacter sequences represent (16%) of the clone library sequences in current generating and (14%) of the initial inoculum
PhyloChip described 35 times more diversity than detected by clone library analysis
Strain S2EOTU6 (4)Geobacillus pallidus str. DSM 3670T
Brevibacillus, OTU7 (2)Geobacillus debilis str. F10
Alicyclobacillus, OTU2 (73)
Bacillus solfatarensis, OTU1 (81)
Symbiobacteriales, OTU8 (2) & OTU16 (1)
Symbiobacteria, OTU9 (2)
Strain JROTU3 (65)Thermoincola ferriacetica str. Z-0001
SHA-15 cloneDCP-dechlorinating consortium clone SHA-15
Moorella OTU11 (2) & OTU19 (1)
Desulfotomaculum, OTU25 (1)
Burkholderia, OTU17 (1) & OTU 18 (1)
Stenotrophomonas, OTU23 (1)
Spirochaeta, OTU14 (1)
Thermodesulfovibrio,OTU10 (2) & OTU20 (1)
Fervidobacterium, OTU12 (2)
Geotogaceae, OTU5 (5)Strain COPOCoprothermobacter proteolyticus str. ATCC 35245OTU4 (47)
Coprothermobacter platensis str. 3RCoprothermobacter sp. str. BHI60-1Coprothermobacter sp. str. BHI60-2OTU15 (1)
MFC thermophilic enrichment clone
Aquifex, outgroup
Proteobacteria
Coprothermobacter
Thermotoga
NitrospiraSpirochaeta
Firmicutes
0.10
Strain S2EOTU6 (4)Geobacillus pallidus str. DSM 3670T
Brevibacillus, OTU7 (2)Geobacillus debilis str. F10
Alicyclobacillus, OTU2 (73)
Bacillus solfatarensis, OTU1 (81)
Symbiobacteriales, OTU8 (2) & OTU16 (1)
Symbiobacteria, OTU9 (2)
Strain JROTU3 (65)Thermoincola ferriacetica str. Z-0001
SHA-15 cloneDCP-dechlorinating consortium clone SHA-15
Moorella OTU11 (2) & OTU19 (1)
Desulfotomaculum, OTU25 (1)
Burkholderia, OTU17 (1) & OTU 18 (1)
Stenotrophomonas, OTU23 (1)
Spirochaeta, OTU14 (1)
Thermodesulfovibrio,OTU10 (2) & OTU20 (1)
Fervidobacterium, OTU12 (2)
Geotogaceae, OTU5 (5)Strain COPOCoprothermobacter proteolyticus str. ATCC 35245OTU4 (47)
Coprothermobacter platensis str. 3RCoprothermobacter sp. str. BHI60-1Coprothermobacter sp. str. BHI60-2OTU15 (1)
MFC thermophilic enrichment clone
Aquifex, outgroup
Proteobacteria
Coprothermobacter
Thermotoga
NitrospiraSpirochaeta
Firmicutes
Proteobacteria
Coprothermobacter
Thermotoga
NitrospiraSpirochaeta
Firmicutes
0.100.10
B11C-0620