Electrical Maintenance Technical evaluation criteria
17
Technical Evaluation Strategy, and Criteria Maintenance Title: Electrical Maintenance Services Contract. Technical Evaluation Strategy Unique Identifier: n/a Alternative Reference Number: N/A Area of Applicability: Maintenance Documentation Type: Strategy Revision: 01 Total Pages: 19 Next Review Date: TBC Disclosure Classification: CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE Compiled by Functional Responsibility Authorised by ………………………………….. ………………………………….. ………………………………….. G. Botma Snr Supervisor EMD B. Mthethwa – Electrical Maintenance Manager DGS Drotsky Electrical Engineering Manager Date: ……………………. Date: …………………………… Date: …………………………… 01/09/2021 01/09/2021 01/09/2021
Transcript of Electrical Maintenance Technical evaluation criteria
Microsoft Word - Electrical Maintenance Technical evaluation
criteriaTitle: Electrical Maintenance Services Contract. Technical
Evaluation Strategy
Unique Identifier:
………………………………….. ………………………………….. …………………………………..
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Unique Identifier: n/a
2.2 NORMATIVE/INFORMATIVE REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 4 2.2.1 Normative .................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2.2 Informative ................................................................................................................................................. 4
2.3 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 Classification ............................................................................................................................................. 4
2.4 ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 PROCESS FOR MONITORING ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.7 RELATED/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ......................................................................................................... 5
3. TENDER TECHNICAL EVALAUTION STRATEGY ................................................................................................ 5
3.1 TECHNICAL EVALUATION THRESHOLD ....................................................................................................... 5 3.2 TET MEMBERS ................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA ............................................................................................................ 7 3.4 QUALITATIVE TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA .................................................................................... 9 3.5 TET MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................................... 14 3.6 FORESEEN ACCEPTABLE / UNACCEPTABLE QUALIFICATIONS............................................................. 16
3.6.1 Risks ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 3.6.2 Exceptions / Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 16
4. AUTHORISATION .................................................................................................................................................. 17
5. REVISIONS ............................................................................................................................................................ 17
TABLES
Table 1: TET Members ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Table 2: Mandatory Technical Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................................................ 7 Table 3: Qualitative Technical Evaluation Criteria ...................................................................................................... 11 Table 4: TET Member Responsibilities ....................................................................................................................... 14 Table 5: Acceptable Technical Risks .......................................................................................................................... 16 Table 6: Unacceptable Technical Risks ..................................................................................................................... 16 Table 7: Acceptable Technical Exceptions / Conditions ............................................................................................. 16 Table 8: Unacceptable Technical Exceptions / Conditions ........................................................................................ 16
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
1. INTRODUCTION
The aim of this document is to highlight the strategy to follow by the technical evaluation team that are
appointed to evaluate the Technical Returnable documentation for the Electrical Maintenance Services
Contract Scope of Work (SOW). The basis of this strategy herein is the Technical Evaluation Guideline
474-011.
2.1 SCOPE
This document refers to the Camden Electrical maintenance Services Contract SOW, in which a contractor
will be contracted to execute the Electrical SOW (refer to Doc no: 240-114042908).
The document covers aspects that will be evaluated and scored by the Technical Evaluation Team (TET).
The document also describes the acceptable and unacceptable risks and qualifications and/or conditions.
The Technical Evaluation Strategy will define the following technical evaluation criteria:
Mandatory Evaluation Criteria
Qualitative Evaluation Criteria
TET Member Responsibilities
Acceptable / Unacceptable Qualifications
Once the Technical Evaluation Strategy is authorised no changes will be made to the evaluation criteria
without appropriate authorisation.
2.1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this tender technical evaluation strategy is to define the Mandatory Evaluation Criteria,
Qualitative Evaluation Criteria, and Technical Evaluation Team responsibilities for the tender technical
evaluation. The technical evaluation strategy serves as a basis for the tender evaluation process.
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
2.1.2 Applicability
This document applies to the Camden Power Station and can be a reference document to Eskom Group
Technology and Commercial.
2.2 NORMATIVE/INFORMATIVE REFERENCES
Parties using this document shall apply the most recent edition of the documents listed in the following
paragraphs.
[2] 32-1034: Eskom Procurement Policy
[3] ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems.
2.2.2 Informative
2.4 ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation Description
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
2.6 PROCESS FOR MONITORING
The document shall be reviewed as and when required to be always in line with the best technological
practices, Eskom’s procurement policies and the Tender Technical Evaluation Procedure (240-48929482).
2.7 RELATED/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
3.1 TECHNICAL EVALUATION THRESHOLD
A weighted score-card approach shall be used to evaluate the technical compliance of the tenders against
the specifications. The overall minimum weighted final score (threshold) required a tenderer to technically
qualify for further evaluation is 80%.
The scoring method will consider the following qualitative evaluation criteria table:
Score (%) Definition
100 COMPLIANT
80 COMPLIANT WITH ASSOTIATED QUALIFICATIONS
Meet technical requirement(s) with:
Acceptable technical risk(s), AND/OR
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
Unacceptable technical risk(s), AND/OR
3.2 TET MEMBERS
The names of TET members will be inserted in the technical evaluation feedback report document.
Table 1: TET Members
TET 1 Electrical Maintenance manager EMD manager
TET 2
TET 3
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
The successful tender should have the following key technical aspects:
Where the mandatory criteria is not met, no further evaluation will be done, and the tenderer deemed unqualified to execute the Services.
Table 2: Mandatory Technical Evaluation Criteria
No. Mandatory Technical Criteria Description Reference to Technical Specification/Tender Returnable
1
Electrical installations in Explosive Atmospheres;
All electricians and technicians working on Electrical Plant, to be trained on, and have certificates on: Electrical installations in Explosive Atmospheres (HAZLOC)
Certificates will be valid at the start date of the Contract. 5 hazloc certificates for electricians and 2 hazloc certificate for technicians/Supervisors.
All other electricians should have valid hazloc certificate in no more than 4 months after contract has started.
Requirement: proof of valid course certificates of number of electricians and technicians. Only persons employed by the Service provider/Company will be looked at.(in your employment at time of submission)
2
Master Installation Electrician
There shall be a Master Installation Electrician (MIE) employed as part of the Key people, and the person shall be registered with Department of labour, all registrations shall be current and valid. A minimum of 1 years experience (working
Requirement: attach certified registration with DoL, years working experience, registration as MIE, with registration number and licence. The registration with DoL must be valid
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
Page: 8 of 19
as MEI) in the Industrial Field, Petro-Chemicals, or Power Generation field, only, which will be deemed as satisfactory.
3 Electrical Qualifications
All qualifications of employees to be as stipulated as in the Service information, under People requirements
Requirement
Attach all CV’s and certified copies of qualifications(matric certificate, Trade test. Installation electrician with registration documentation as per Service information)
NOTE: NEC 3 TSC- Core Clauses; People 24.1 Only documentation of persons observed during evaluation stage shall be allowed on site for the successful tenderer; only replacements with the exact same qualification, or better qualification shall be considered.
Persons other than those evaluated at Evaluation stage, shall not be allowed on SITE, at Contract Start Date.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
3.4 QUALITATIVE TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
A minimum of 80 points out of 100 points achieved on qualitative Evaluation criteria in order to proceed with further evaluation.
NOTE: NEC 3 TSC- Core Clauses; People 24.1 Only documentation of persons observed during evaluation stage shall be allowed on site for the successful tenderer; only replacements with the exact same qualification, or better qualification shall be considered, during the contracting phase.
Persons other than those evaluated at Evaluation stage, shall not be allowed on SITE, at Contract Start Date.
Service Experience background
Contractor, and staff shall have experience in carrying out the Services, or Services of similar nature, in another Power Plant. (Ability for supplier execute the required scope, based on method statement, QCP & work instruction/procedure). At least 80% of contracting staff shall have 4 years or more experience on Generation Power Plants.
Traceable references where Services was executed. (Proof of experience shall be submitted). Parent Company Support to be provided locally. (Parent Company guarantee or performance bond shall be submitted), when contracting
with other parties. Manpower requirements as per tender requirements. OEM of installed equipment will be an advantage. Related experience of employees:
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
CV’s of all staff. Legislative Authorisations of Current Employees (PSR & ORHVS) Staff shall have experience power plant maintenance. Valid trade test certificates of individuals. Installation electrician for 3 phase requirement – Certified and registered member. At least 1 years’ experience. Submit experience. Master installation electrician approved and certified for hazardous installations – Certified and registered member. At least 1 years’
experience. Submit experience. Technical completeness of tender and compliance to specification see documentation lay-out as per ISO 45001; 2018, and Construction
regulations. Innovation by any value adding options over and above the tender specification offered. Capability/capacity – staffing structure
. Installation Electrician – Single-Phase and Three-Phase
A minimum of 2 Electricians shall be qualified and registered as 3-Phase, Installation Electricians A minimum of 2 Electricians shall be qualified and registered as 1-Phase , Installation Electricians All other electricians shall have, valid trade certification for Electrical Industrial Field Requirement; 2 x 3-phase licences employed, 2 x 1-phase licences employed, All total of 16 x valid Electrical trade test
certificates.
Tenders, which do not meet Eskom’s Qualitative requirements, will not be evaluated further.
Based on the evaluation criteria the tenderers will be given an overall rating of X/100, a minimum of 80/100 achieve an 80% result, on Qualitative evaluation only.
Tools and equipment- AFTER ALL TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS ONLY
Part of the technical evaluation shall be at the premises of the Supplier in order to determine if all the tools and equipment to execute the Services is available and ready for use.
The list are available in the Service Information. The Supplier, its Employees shall have available for inspection, on a pre arrange date by the Procurement officer, all TOOLS and
EQUIPMENT to determine the validity of such equipment and tools to execute the Service Information.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
Page: 11 of 19
Requirement: inventory list of all tools and equipment viewed at the premises shall be generated and kept by the Employer, and shall be available at the START DATE of the Contract, by the successful Service Provider.
NOTE: This evaluation for Tools and Equipment will be performed on all technically acceptable tenderers only, after the Evaluation stage of documentation.
Table 3: Qualitative Technical Evaluation Criteria
No.: Qualitative Technical Criteria Description
Criteria Weighting
1.1
Contractor shall have experience in carrying out the Works, or Works of similar nature, in another Power Plant, or Industry (Ability for supplier to execute the required scope, based on method
statement, QCP & work instruction/procedures
Supplier 90-100% of the scope (20 points) Supplier 80-89% of the scope (15 points) Supplier 70-79% of the scope (5 points) Supplier 60-69% of the scope (3 points)
Supplier 50-59% of the scope(1 points)
Requirement:
Provide QCP/ITP’s for inspection by client/employer as per Service information(5)
20
. Requirement: 5
Unique Identifier: n/a
Criteria Weighting
Proof of experience shall be submitted.
a) 5 companies (5 points) b) 4 companies (4 points) c) 3 companies ( 3 points) d) 2 companies (2 points) e) 1 company (1 point) f) No references (0 points)
Provide all references where the nature of the required/similar service is/was executed .Please
Provide contracts/ Purchase Order numbers or Clearance certificate (from the Company where service was rendered).
3. Experience 25
advantage to the supplier.
switchgear (15)
switchgear (10)
Requirement:
qualifications
25
Unique Identifier: n/a
Criteria Weighting
Requirement:
Ensure that all qualifications and submission documents of employees are true and certified
5
Requirement:
Provide all test certificates and calibration certificates of your test equipment as per the tool list in the scope of work.
10
Requirement:
Provide your available tool list for use on site for inspection
5
Provide company organogram 2
Provide site organogram 3
Unique Identifier: n/a
Supplier:………………………………………………………………..
1
2
3
1 Method Statement
4.2 Staffing structure & registrations
Unique Identifier: n/a
Unique Identifier: n/a
3.6.1 Risks
Risk Description
1. Marginally failing to meet the 80% threshold as stipulated in section 3.1.
Table 6: Unacceptable Technical Risks
Risk Description
1. Failing to meet any of the Technical Gatekeepers as listed in section 3.3, Table 2. (Consider and accept recent Audit report on ISO systems)
3.6.2 Exceptions / Conditions
Risk Description
1. As per the requirements set out under the Qualitative Technical Evaluation Criteria, section 3.4 of this document.
Table 8: Unacceptable Technical Exceptions / Conditions
Risk Description
1. As per the requirements set out under the Mandatory Technical Evaluation Criteria, section 3.3 of this document. (Consider and accept recent Audit report on ISO systems)
Camden Power Station ……… Tender Evaluation Strategy
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Unique Identifier: 240 - …….
Name Designation
5. REVISIONS
6. DEVELOPMENT TEAM
Unique Identifier:
………………………………….. ………………………………….. …………………………………..
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Unique Identifier: n/a
2.2 NORMATIVE/INFORMATIVE REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 4 2.2.1 Normative .................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2.2 Informative ................................................................................................................................................. 4
2.3 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 Classification ............................................................................................................................................. 4
2.4 ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 PROCESS FOR MONITORING ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.7 RELATED/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ......................................................................................................... 5
3. TENDER TECHNICAL EVALAUTION STRATEGY ................................................................................................ 5
3.1 TECHNICAL EVALUATION THRESHOLD ....................................................................................................... 5 3.2 TET MEMBERS ................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA ............................................................................................................ 7 3.4 QUALITATIVE TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA .................................................................................... 9 3.5 TET MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................................... 14 3.6 FORESEEN ACCEPTABLE / UNACCEPTABLE QUALIFICATIONS............................................................. 16
3.6.1 Risks ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 3.6.2 Exceptions / Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 16
4. AUTHORISATION .................................................................................................................................................. 17
5. REVISIONS ............................................................................................................................................................ 17
TABLES
Table 1: TET Members ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Table 2: Mandatory Technical Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................................................ 7 Table 3: Qualitative Technical Evaluation Criteria ...................................................................................................... 11 Table 4: TET Member Responsibilities ....................................................................................................................... 14 Table 5: Acceptable Technical Risks .......................................................................................................................... 16 Table 6: Unacceptable Technical Risks ..................................................................................................................... 16 Table 7: Acceptable Technical Exceptions / Conditions ............................................................................................. 16 Table 8: Unacceptable Technical Exceptions / Conditions ........................................................................................ 16
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
1. INTRODUCTION
The aim of this document is to highlight the strategy to follow by the technical evaluation team that are
appointed to evaluate the Technical Returnable documentation for the Electrical Maintenance Services
Contract Scope of Work (SOW). The basis of this strategy herein is the Technical Evaluation Guideline
474-011.
2.1 SCOPE
This document refers to the Camden Electrical maintenance Services Contract SOW, in which a contractor
will be contracted to execute the Electrical SOW (refer to Doc no: 240-114042908).
The document covers aspects that will be evaluated and scored by the Technical Evaluation Team (TET).
The document also describes the acceptable and unacceptable risks and qualifications and/or conditions.
The Technical Evaluation Strategy will define the following technical evaluation criteria:
Mandatory Evaluation Criteria
Qualitative Evaluation Criteria
TET Member Responsibilities
Acceptable / Unacceptable Qualifications
Once the Technical Evaluation Strategy is authorised no changes will be made to the evaluation criteria
without appropriate authorisation.
2.1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this tender technical evaluation strategy is to define the Mandatory Evaluation Criteria,
Qualitative Evaluation Criteria, and Technical Evaluation Team responsibilities for the tender technical
evaluation. The technical evaluation strategy serves as a basis for the tender evaluation process.
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
2.1.2 Applicability
This document applies to the Camden Power Station and can be a reference document to Eskom Group
Technology and Commercial.
2.2 NORMATIVE/INFORMATIVE REFERENCES
Parties using this document shall apply the most recent edition of the documents listed in the following
paragraphs.
[2] 32-1034: Eskom Procurement Policy
[3] ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems.
2.2.2 Informative
2.4 ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation Description
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
2.6 PROCESS FOR MONITORING
The document shall be reviewed as and when required to be always in line with the best technological
practices, Eskom’s procurement policies and the Tender Technical Evaluation Procedure (240-48929482).
2.7 RELATED/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
3.1 TECHNICAL EVALUATION THRESHOLD
A weighted score-card approach shall be used to evaluate the technical compliance of the tenders against
the specifications. The overall minimum weighted final score (threshold) required a tenderer to technically
qualify for further evaluation is 80%.
The scoring method will consider the following qualitative evaluation criteria table:
Score (%) Definition
100 COMPLIANT
80 COMPLIANT WITH ASSOTIATED QUALIFICATIONS
Meet technical requirement(s) with:
Acceptable technical risk(s), AND/OR
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
Unacceptable technical risk(s), AND/OR
3.2 TET MEMBERS
The names of TET members will be inserted in the technical evaluation feedback report document.
Table 1: TET Members
TET 1 Electrical Maintenance manager EMD manager
TET 2
TET 3
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
The successful tender should have the following key technical aspects:
Where the mandatory criteria is not met, no further evaluation will be done, and the tenderer deemed unqualified to execute the Services.
Table 2: Mandatory Technical Evaluation Criteria
No. Mandatory Technical Criteria Description Reference to Technical Specification/Tender Returnable
1
Electrical installations in Explosive Atmospheres;
All electricians and technicians working on Electrical Plant, to be trained on, and have certificates on: Electrical installations in Explosive Atmospheres (HAZLOC)
Certificates will be valid at the start date of the Contract. 5 hazloc certificates for electricians and 2 hazloc certificate for technicians/Supervisors.
All other electricians should have valid hazloc certificate in no more than 4 months after contract has started.
Requirement: proof of valid course certificates of number of electricians and technicians. Only persons employed by the Service provider/Company will be looked at.(in your employment at time of submission)
2
Master Installation Electrician
There shall be a Master Installation Electrician (MIE) employed as part of the Key people, and the person shall be registered with Department of labour, all registrations shall be current and valid. A minimum of 1 years experience (working
Requirement: attach certified registration with DoL, years working experience, registration as MIE, with registration number and licence. The registration with DoL must be valid
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
Page: 8 of 19
as MEI) in the Industrial Field, Petro-Chemicals, or Power Generation field, only, which will be deemed as satisfactory.
3 Electrical Qualifications
All qualifications of employees to be as stipulated as in the Service information, under People requirements
Requirement
Attach all CV’s and certified copies of qualifications(matric certificate, Trade test. Installation electrician with registration documentation as per Service information)
NOTE: NEC 3 TSC- Core Clauses; People 24.1 Only documentation of persons observed during evaluation stage shall be allowed on site for the successful tenderer; only replacements with the exact same qualification, or better qualification shall be considered.
Persons other than those evaluated at Evaluation stage, shall not be allowed on SITE, at Contract Start Date.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
3.4 QUALITATIVE TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
A minimum of 80 points out of 100 points achieved on qualitative Evaluation criteria in order to proceed with further evaluation.
NOTE: NEC 3 TSC- Core Clauses; People 24.1 Only documentation of persons observed during evaluation stage shall be allowed on site for the successful tenderer; only replacements with the exact same qualification, or better qualification shall be considered, during the contracting phase.
Persons other than those evaluated at Evaluation stage, shall not be allowed on SITE, at Contract Start Date.
Service Experience background
Contractor, and staff shall have experience in carrying out the Services, or Services of similar nature, in another Power Plant. (Ability for supplier execute the required scope, based on method statement, QCP & work instruction/procedure). At least 80% of contracting staff shall have 4 years or more experience on Generation Power Plants.
Traceable references where Services was executed. (Proof of experience shall be submitted). Parent Company Support to be provided locally. (Parent Company guarantee or performance bond shall be submitted), when contracting
with other parties. Manpower requirements as per tender requirements. OEM of installed equipment will be an advantage. Related experience of employees:
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
CV’s of all staff. Legislative Authorisations of Current Employees (PSR & ORHVS) Staff shall have experience power plant maintenance. Valid trade test certificates of individuals. Installation electrician for 3 phase requirement – Certified and registered member. At least 1 years’ experience. Submit experience. Master installation electrician approved and certified for hazardous installations – Certified and registered member. At least 1 years’
experience. Submit experience. Technical completeness of tender and compliance to specification see documentation lay-out as per ISO 45001; 2018, and Construction
regulations. Innovation by any value adding options over and above the tender specification offered. Capability/capacity – staffing structure
. Installation Electrician – Single-Phase and Three-Phase
A minimum of 2 Electricians shall be qualified and registered as 3-Phase, Installation Electricians A minimum of 2 Electricians shall be qualified and registered as 1-Phase , Installation Electricians All other electricians shall have, valid trade certification for Electrical Industrial Field Requirement; 2 x 3-phase licences employed, 2 x 1-phase licences employed, All total of 16 x valid Electrical trade test
certificates.
Tenders, which do not meet Eskom’s Qualitative requirements, will not be evaluated further.
Based on the evaluation criteria the tenderers will be given an overall rating of X/100, a minimum of 80/100 achieve an 80% result, on Qualitative evaluation only.
Tools and equipment- AFTER ALL TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS ONLY
Part of the technical evaluation shall be at the premises of the Supplier in order to determine if all the tools and equipment to execute the Services is available and ready for use.
The list are available in the Service Information. The Supplier, its Employees shall have available for inspection, on a pre arrange date by the Procurement officer, all TOOLS and
EQUIPMENT to determine the validity of such equipment and tools to execute the Service Information.
Technical Evaluation Strategy and Criteria
Unique Identifier: n/a
Page: 11 of 19
Requirement: inventory list of all tools and equipment viewed at the premises shall be generated and kept by the Employer, and shall be available at the START DATE of the Contract, by the successful Service Provider.
NOTE: This evaluation for Tools and Equipment will be performed on all technically acceptable tenderers only, after the Evaluation stage of documentation.
Table 3: Qualitative Technical Evaluation Criteria
No.: Qualitative Technical Criteria Description
Criteria Weighting
1.1
Contractor shall have experience in carrying out the Works, or Works of similar nature, in another Power Plant, or Industry (Ability for supplier to execute the required scope, based on method
statement, QCP & work instruction/procedures
Supplier 90-100% of the scope (20 points) Supplier 80-89% of the scope (15 points) Supplier 70-79% of the scope (5 points) Supplier 60-69% of the scope (3 points)
Supplier 50-59% of the scope(1 points)
Requirement:
Provide QCP/ITP’s for inspection by client/employer as per Service information(5)
20
. Requirement: 5
Unique Identifier: n/a
Criteria Weighting
Proof of experience shall be submitted.
a) 5 companies (5 points) b) 4 companies (4 points) c) 3 companies ( 3 points) d) 2 companies (2 points) e) 1 company (1 point) f) No references (0 points)
Provide all references where the nature of the required/similar service is/was executed .Please
Provide contracts/ Purchase Order numbers or Clearance certificate (from the Company where service was rendered).
3. Experience 25
advantage to the supplier.
switchgear (15)
switchgear (10)
Requirement:
qualifications
25
Unique Identifier: n/a
Criteria Weighting
Requirement:
Ensure that all qualifications and submission documents of employees are true and certified
5
Requirement:
Provide all test certificates and calibration certificates of your test equipment as per the tool list in the scope of work.
10
Requirement:
Provide your available tool list for use on site for inspection
5
Provide company organogram 2
Provide site organogram 3
Unique Identifier: n/a
Supplier:………………………………………………………………..
1
2
3
1 Method Statement
4.2 Staffing structure & registrations
Unique Identifier: n/a
Unique Identifier: n/a
3.6.1 Risks
Risk Description
1. Marginally failing to meet the 80% threshold as stipulated in section 3.1.
Table 6: Unacceptable Technical Risks
Risk Description
1. Failing to meet any of the Technical Gatekeepers as listed in section 3.3, Table 2. (Consider and accept recent Audit report on ISO systems)
3.6.2 Exceptions / Conditions
Risk Description
1. As per the requirements set out under the Qualitative Technical Evaluation Criteria, section 3.4 of this document.
Table 8: Unacceptable Technical Exceptions / Conditions
Risk Description
1. As per the requirements set out under the Mandatory Technical Evaluation Criteria, section 3.3 of this document. (Consider and accept recent Audit report on ISO systems)
Camden Power Station ……… Tender Evaluation Strategy
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Unique Identifier: 240 - …….
Name Designation
5. REVISIONS
6. DEVELOPMENT TEAM
