EILS_NSF Program Assessment Strategies for obtaining meaningful & comparable results.
-
Upload
evelyn-edwards -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
Transcript of EILS_NSF Program Assessment Strategies for obtaining meaningful & comparable results.
EILS_NSF Program Assessment
EILS_NSF Program Assessment
Strategies for obtaining meaningful & comparable
results
Strategies for obtaining meaningful & comparable
results
Discussion: Understanding
Assessment Needs
Discussion: Understanding
Assessment Needs
• Student learning outcomes vs. evaluation of program implementation
• Added twist: obtaining “comparable results”
NSF_TUES Guidelines NSF_TUES Guidelines
• Methods likely only to have local impact discouraged; encourage “broad based”
• Developing or testing newly developed approaches encouraged
• Collect and synthesize information about student understanding, reasoning, practical skills, interests, attitudes or other valued outcomes.
““Testing effectiveness of new materials and Testing effectiveness of new materials and instructional approaches”instructional approaches”
Program Implementation vs. Student Learning
Outcomes
Program Implementation vs. Student Learning
Outcomes How/Was the course taught
Students served, demographics etc.
Novelty, course context
Institutional Stability, Changes,
Connections
What did they learn?
What can they do (that they couldn’t do before)?
Skill set? Concepts? Perspectives? Practice?
What do results say about instruction and course implementation?
Comparative Cases?
Student Learning Outcomes Different
Measures
Student Learning Outcomes Different
Measures
Important to know and do
Worth being familiar with
Enduring understanding developing skill sets
Assessment Types
Traditional/ Known-Answer•quizzes & tests, •selected response•constructed response
Performance Tasks, Portfolios•Open ended responses•Demonstration, proof of concept•Authentic practice •Scoring strategies
UCSC/SEED MethodsUCSC/SEED Methods Student self-report surveys (attitudes, satisfaction, existing & new understandings)
Focus Group Interviews (supplemental to surveys)
External/participant reviews (mentor feedback, satisfaction)
Individual Lab assessments: Pre -post questionnaires (key concepts)
Pre -post problem sets (“back of the envelope reasoning”)
Pre-post concept mapping (LCA) Diagnostic Learning Activities
Also tracking student demographics, enrollment, majors, Also tracking student demographics, enrollment, majors, interest, course progressionsinterest, course progressions
Proposal for new and innovative assessment
strategies
Proposal for new and innovative assessment
strategies• Pre - post format but integrated within in-class activities or homework
• Online, performance-based • Emphasis on quantitative reasoning, data interpretation and problem solving skills
UCSC/SEED Results cont.
Indicator Categories
UCSC/SEED Results cont.
Indicator Categories
UCSC/SEED Results cont.
UCSC/SEED Results cont.
• Carbon Footprint subcategory (Radiation, Eco-toxicity, Pollution Lithosphere into Biosphere, Carbon Emissions, & Greenhouse Gases) = largest point spread
• Social Justice & equity = low totals and low point spread