Efficacy of EGFR TKIs in Patients With NSCLC With Uncommon … · 2020. 7. 2. · 7 EGFR Exon...
Transcript of Efficacy of EGFR TKIs in Patients With NSCLC With Uncommon … · 2020. 7. 2. · 7 EGFR Exon...
Efficacy of EGFR TKIs in Patients With NSCLC With Uncommon
EGFR Mutations 2017 WCLC- PACIFICO Yokohama Convention Center
Terufumi Kato, MD
Kanagawa Cancer Center,Yokohama, Japan
BI Symposium
2
Faculty Disclosure
• Honoraria: AstraZeneca; Boehringer Ingelheim; Chugai Pharma; Kyowa
Hakko Kirin; Lilly; Ono Pharmaceutical; Pfizer; Roche; Taiho Pharmaceutical
• Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim;
Ono Pharmaceutical
• Research Funding: Abbvie; Astellas Pharma; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers
Squibb; Chugai Pharma; Daiichi Sankyo; Kyowa Hakko Kirin; Lilly; Merck
Sharp & Dohme; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim; PAREXEL; Pfizer; Quintiles;
Shionogi Pharma; Taiho Pharmaceutical; Takeda; Yakult Honsha
3
EGFR Mutations in NSCLC
Mitsudomi et al., Cancer Science, 2007
Mitsudomi et al., Cancer Science, 2007
EGF binding EGF binding TM Tyrosine kinase Autophosphorylation
Exon 2 5 7 13 16 17 18-21 22-24 28
68
8
72
8
72
9
76
1 7
62
82
3
82
4
87
5
Exon 18 (nucleotide binding loop) Exon 19 Exon 20
Exon 21 (activation loop)
Ex19Del L858R
G719X L861Q Ex20 Ins
4
Common or Uncommon/Non-classical (N=1,632)
Shen et al. Lung Cancer. 2017;110:56.
Single, uncommon/non-classical mutations
or insertion: 8%
Exon 21 single 1%
Exon 20 single 1%
insertions 3%
Exon 19 single 0.4%
Exon 18 single 3%
Uncommon/non-classical mutation with Del19/L858R: 6%
Complex uncommon/non-classical, without Del19 and L858R: 2%
Del19
(n=354)
42% Ex21
L858R
(n=356)
42%
5
• Irreversible second- and third-generation TKIs overcome resistance induced by
uncommon secondary mutations
In Vitro Activity of First-, Second-, and Third-Generation TKIs
Against Uncommon EGFR Mutations
Chiba M et al. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:281.
Gefitinib
Erlotinib
Afatinib
Dacomitinib
Osimertinib IC50 (
nM
)
10000
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
L858R L858R/L747S L858R/D761Y L858R/T854A L858R/T790M
6
In Vitro Activity of First-, Second-, and Third-Generation
TKIs Against Uncommon EGFR Mutations • In separate assays, first- and third-generation TKIs demonstrated reduced activity against cell lines harbouring
uncommon mutations, whereas the response to afatinib was similar across cell lines
1. Saxon et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:884; 2. Banno et al. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:1134.
TKI = tyrosine kinase inhibitor; IC50 = 50% inhibitory concentration.
1 1 1
20
2.5 3.6
32
3.5
20
0
10
20
30
40
IC50 r
ati
o r
ela
tive
to
L8
58
R
L861Q and S768I2
L858R L861Q S768I L858R L861Q S768I L858R L861Q S768I
Erlotinib Afatinib Osimertinib
125
100
75
50
25
0 0 0.001 10 1 0.1 0.01
µM
Cell v
iab
ilit
y (
%)
Afatinib
Gefitinib
Osimertinib
125
100
75
50
25
0 0 0.001 10 1 0.1 0.01
µM
Cell v
iab
ilit
y (
%)
L858M/L861Q1
L858R
Afatinib
Gefitinib
Osimertinib
L858M/L861Q
7
EGFR Exon 18 Mutations in Lung Cancer:
Molecular Predictors of Augmented Sensitivity to Afatinib as
Compared with First- or Third-Generation TKIs
• Among 1,402 EGFR mutations, Del19, L858R, and Ins20 were detected in 40%, 47%, and 4%, respectively.
Exon 18 mutations, including G719X, E709X, and Del18, were present in 3.2%
• Patients with lung cancers harbouring G719X exhibited higher response rate to afatinib (80%) than to 1G TKIs
(35%–56%)
Kobayashi Y et al. CCR 2015.
IC90s o
f E
GF
R-T
KIs
in
Tra
nsfe
cte
d
Ba/F
3 C
ells (
nm
ol/
L)
104
103
102
101
100
10–1 Gefitinib Erlotinib Afatinib Dacomitinib AZD9291
882
187 213
7
9,350
884
215 167
6
>10,000
448*
2,717
69
1.7
0.7 0.9
0.3
>100
29 16
166
6
1.6
>1,000
3,078
400*
1.1
53
62 93
Del 18
E709K
G719A
Del 19
WT
Ctrough
Del 19 40% (n=563)
Ins 20 4% (n=63)
Others 5% (n=71)
Exon 18 3% (n=45)
L858R 47% (n=660)
G719A (n=22)
G719S (n=9)
G719C (n=8)
G719R (n=1)
G719V (n=1)
E709H + G719C (n=1)
Del E709_T710 ins D (n=3)
*
*
*
8
Case Report: Afatinib in a TKI-Pretreated Patient With
EGFR L858M/L861Q (in cis) • 62-year-old Caucasian female with extensive involvement of a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma
• Worsening disease with 4 months of erlotinib and 4 months of chemotherapy
• Radiographic response 2 months after initiation of afatinib
• Remained on afatinib, with Grade 1 diarrhoea as her only side effect, for 10 months and continues treatment
Saxon et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:884.
9
Clinical Data in TKI-Pretreated Patients: Radiographic
Responses After Suboptimal Response to Other EGFR-TKIs
Peled et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:e81.
Patient With ex19del, T790M, and G724S
C797S
T790M
G724S
ex19del
TP53
Mar-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Dec-15 Mar-16
2.9
0.1
0.3
6.5
19.5
24.2
33
23.6
33.7
7.8
23.7
15.1
39.6
2.6
45.7
60.1
Cell-free DNA tumor response. Cell-free DNA analysis of total somatic alteration burden detected over five time points and
the EGFR variant-specific results over time reflect responses to changes in matched therapy. TP53, tumor protein p53
Apr-14
Gefitinib
Jun-15
Osimertinib
Sep-15
Osimertinib + Afatinib
Dec-15
Pemetrexed
10
Clinical Data in TKI-Pretreated Patients: Best Response in Patients
With LMD Harbouring Uncommon Mutations
• 3/11 patients with leptomeningeal carcinoma treated with afatinib harboured an uncommon Exon 18
mutation (L719X)
• Median CSF concentration in all 11 patients was 2.88 nM (afatinib’s IC50 for EGFR being 0.5 nM).
PFS and OS in patients harbouring a G719X mutation were 5.6 months (2.0-10.0) and 7.0 months
(5.6 ongoing to 13.0)
Tamiya et al. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:4177.
aTreatment continued after data cutoff; bCensored at data cutoff (patient still alive).
LMD = leptomeningeal disease; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; PFS = progression-free survival; OS = overall survival; NE = Not evaluated; PR = partial response;
PD = progressive disease.
Plasma CSF
Best
Response PFS (Days) OS (Days)
1 146.9 NE PR 309 396
2 192.0 6.0 PD 61 212
3 767.6 0.8 PR 171a 171b
Concentration of Afatinib in Plasma and CSF, Penetration Rate, and Efficacy in
Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC With LMD
Concentration (nM)
11
Clinical Data in TKI-Pretreated Patients:
Time to Treatment Failure With Afatinib • 66 uncommon mutations were reported (18.4% of all known EGFR mutations in the compassionate-use programme)
– Majority of patients (67%) received afatinib as third- or fourth-line treatment, with median treatment duration of 3.6 months
• No significant difference between median TTF for patients with uncommon/non-classical mutations (3.6 months) compared
with those with Del19 (4.6 months) or L858R (5.8 months) mutations
Heigener et al. Oncologist. 2015;20:1167.
TTF = time to treatment failure.
Distribution of the 60 Rare
EGFR Mutations (N=60)
Exon 18
substitution, 1, 2%
Exon 19
insertion/deletion, 2, 3%
Exon 19 substitution, 4,
7%
Exon 20 insertion, 3, 5%
T790M, 1, 2%
Exon 21 substitution, 4,
7%
Complex mutations
incl. T790M, 29
48%
G719X, 7,
11%
Complex
mutations, 9
15%
100
75
50
25
0 0 6 12 18 24 30
Months
Tre
atm
en
t p
rob
ab
ilit
y (
%)
Del19
L858R
Uncommon
12
First-line Clinical Data: Retrospective Analysis of PFS in
57 Patients Treated With Afatinib or First-Generation TKIs • In all mutation groups analysed, the afatinib group
exhibited longer median PFS compared with first-
generation TKIs
– Entire uncommon mutations cohort, except exon
20 insertionsa: 11.0 mo vs 3.6 mo
– G719X, S768I, or L861Q: 18.3 mo vs 2.6 mo
– Uncommon mutations with Del19 or L858R:
11.0 mo vs 8.2 mo
Del19+ 18G721D; Del19+ 19L732P; Del19+ 20L792P; Del19+
20S768I + 20V774M; Del19+ 21L858R + 21K860I; 21L858R +
18E709X; 21L858R + 20S768I; 21L858R + 20V786E; 21L858R
+ 20T790M; 21L858R + 20 insertion; 21L858R + 21L833Vl
21L858R + 21K860I; 21L858R + 18G719X +20 insertion
– Uncommon mutation alone or in combination with other
uncommon mutations: 18.3 mo vs 2.8 mo
18I715V; 18K716E; 18V717G; 18G719X; 19L747P;19
insertion; 20A763_Y764 insFQEA; 20S768I; 20G779F;
21L861Q; 18G719X+21L861Q; 18E709X + 18G719X;
18G719X +20S768I; 20T790 M+ 21L861Q; 21M825L
+21R831C; 18V703L + 18L707W +18G719X; 18E709X +
18T710S + 18G719X; 19V742F + 19A743 V+ 20H773R
Shen et al. Lung Cancer. 2017;110:56.
CI = confidence interval. aexon 20 insertions (except A763_Y764 insFQEA).
No. at risk
1st TKI 30 12 8 4 2 0 0 0
2nd TKI 21 13 8 5 2 2 1 0
No. at risk
1st TKI 21 6 4 2 1 0 0 0
2nd TKI 13 8 3 3 1 1 0 0
Entire Uncommon Mutations Cohort,
Except Exon 20 Insertions
Uncommon Mutations With
Del19 or L858R
Uncommon Mutation Alone or in Combination
With Other Uncommon Mutations
G719X, S768I, or L861Q 100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PF
S (
%)
Months
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Log rank P=0.03
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PF
S (
%)
Months
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
No. at risk
1st TKI 14 4 3 2 1 0 0 0
2nd TKI 10 6 2 2 1 1 0 0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 P
FS
(%
)
Months
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
No. at risk
1st TKI 9 6 4 2 1 0 0 0
2nd TKI 8 5 5 2 1 1 1 0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PF
S (
%)
Months
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
No. Median (mo) 95% CI
1st TKI 30 3.6 0.1-7.1
2nd TKI 21 11.0 0-22.8
Log rank P=0.24 Log rank P=0.07
No. Median (mo) 95% CI
1st TKI 9 8.2 2.1-14.3
2nd TKI 8 11.0 0-26.1
No. Median (mo) 95% CI
1st TKI 14 2.6 2.1-3.1
2nd TKI 10 18.3 0-39.2
No. Median (mo) 95% CI
1st TKI 21 2.8 2.1-3.4
2nd TKI 13 18.3 3.2-33.4
Log rank P=0.12
13
First-line Clinical Data: Prospective Efficacy Assessments
in the LUX-Lung Programme • Of 600 patients given afatinib in LUX-Lung 2/3/6, 75 (12%) patients had uncommon EGFR mutations1
• The LUX-Lung programme provides the largest series of prospective efficacy data in uncommon
mutations1-4
1. Yang et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:830; 2. Passaro et al. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5:383; 3. Katakami et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3335; 4. Wu et al. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:213;
5. Yang et al. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:539; 6. Sequist et el. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3327.
aEGFR mutations detected by TheraScreen EGFR29 test. Common: 19 deletions in exon 19 and L858R in exon 21; Uncommon: 3 insertions in exon 20, L861Q, T790M, G719S, G719A and G719C, and S768I.
LUX-Lung 2
Phase 2 (N=129)5
Afatinib
First- and second-line (after chemotherapy)
Direct sequ. (central)
Del19=52 L858R=54
N=23 N=23
LUX-Lung 3
Phase 3 (N=345)6
Afatinib vs Cis/Pem
First-line
EGFR29a (central)
Del19=170 L858R=138
N=37 N=26
LUX-Lung 6
Phase 3 (N=364)4
Afatinib vs Cis/Gem
First-line
EGFR29a (central)
Del19=186 L858R=138
N=40 N=26
Common mutations
Uncommon mutations;
treated with afatinib4
Mutation test
Line of treatment
Treatment
14
LUX-Lung 2, 3, and 6: Tumour Shrinkage by Independent
Review (n=67a)
• 3 patients in group 1 achieved complete response
– 1 each with G719X, K739_1744dup6, and L858R+Q709G/V
Yang et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:830.
a8 patients were not included because of insufficient data. bT790M alone.
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
b
b
b
Ma
xim
um
ch
an
ge
fro
m
bas
eli
ne (
%)
Group 2 (n=14): de novo T790M mutations T790M alone, T790M+Del19, T790M+L858R, T790M+G719X, T790M+L858R+G719X
Group 1 (n=33): point mutations or duplications in exons 18-21 L861Q, G719X, G719X+S768I, G719X+L861Q, E709G or V+L858R, S768I+L858R,
S768I, L861P, P848L, R776H+L858R, L861Q+Del19, K739_1744dup6
Group 3 (n=20): exon 20 insertions
15
LUX-Lung 2, 3, and 6: Response Rate, PFS, and OS by
Independent Review
Yang et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:830.
T790M
(n=14)
Exon 20 ins
(n=23)
Mut/Dup
Exon 18-21
(n=38)
G719X
(n=18)
L861Q
(n=16)
S768I
(n=8)
Response rate
(%) 14.3 8.7 71.1 77.8 56.3 100.0
PFS (mo) 2.9 2.7 10.7 13.8 8.2 14.7
OS (mo) 14.9 9.2 19.4 26.9 17.1 NE
16
Summary
• Afatinib has shown preclinical and clinical activity in TKI-naive and TKI-pretreated
patients with NSCLC harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations
• Activity of afatinib against uncommon EGFR mutations in patients with LMD was also
reported
• Afatinib was especially active in NSCLC tumours harbouring point mutations or
duplications in exons 18-21 (eg, G719X, S768I, L861Q K739_1744dup6, and
L858R+Q709G/V)
• Anecdotal data from erlotinib/gefitinib trials show variable and mainly limited
responses to these EGFR TKIs in patients with NSCLC harbouring uncommon
mutations
• These data could help inform clinical decisions for patients with NSCLC harbouring
uncommon EGFR mutations
17
Yokohama, when sunny, and in later fall…
We are
HERE Just 3 train stops,
or 30 min. walk!
Ocean liner Hikawa maru, Yamashita Park
For more information about other BI events and collaborations, please visit www.inOncology.com