Effects of the spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties on water dynamics in cranberry...
-
Upload
bertha-goodman -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Effects of the spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties on water dynamics in cranberry...
Effects of the spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties on water dynamics
in cranberry production
Gumiere, S.J.; Caron, J.; Périard, Y.; Lafond, J.
NACREW-2013 - QuébecDép. Sols et Génie Agroalimentaire, FSAA, U. Laval.
• Soil hydraulic properties may present spatial variability and dependence at the scale of watersheds or fields even in man-made structures, such as cranberry fields.
• Water management in cranberry fields should take into account the spatial variability of soil properties.
• First we need to characterize the spatial variability ant its sources.
Introduction
What are the sources of variability in the field?
Variability in crop
productivity
Variability from soil
properties
Variability from root
water uptake
Variability from
irrigation system
Variability from ground
water
We need to characterize these sources in order to understand their effects on crop productivity.
Material and Methods:Field observations: • Irrigation system;• Sat. hydraulic cond. (Ksat);• Soil water retention curves;• Matric potential;• Photosynthesis;• Ground water level;• Crop productivity.
Site A
Site B
Material and Methods:Geostatistics and interpolation• Variographic analyses• Kriging• Thin plate splines (TPS)• Entropy methods …
1( ) ( ( ) ( ))
2h Var X s h X h
Material and Methods:• Variographic analyses• Kriging• Thin plate splines (TPS)• Entropy methods
Find homogeneous zones
Results : Characterization and interpolation
• Saturated hydraulic conductivity;• Spatio-temporal variability of soil matric potential;• Crop productivity;
Saturated hydraulic conductivity of two depths (20 and 40cm)
Site A Site B
Slow zonesFast zones
Very slow zones
Soil Tension at 10 cm (root zone)
kPa
Site A
Before irrigation
After irrigation
T1 + 1 h
Site A
Soil Tension at 10 cm (root zone)
kPa
Before irrigation
After irrigation
T1 + 1 h
Site B
Site A, productivity Site B, productivity
1000 x lbs/acre 1000 x lbs/acre
Conclusion• Spatial patterns of Ksat at both sites.• Matric potential seems to follow the same
patterns.• Crop productivity has high spatial variability.
– Site A, low productivity in fast zones;– Site B, low productivity in very slow zones;
Thank you!Questions???