Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

download Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

of 15

Transcript of Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    1/15

    Effects of surface topography on seismic ground response in the Egion(Greece) 15 June 1995 earthquake

    G.A. Athanasopoulos*, P.C. Pelekis, E.A. Leonidou

    Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, GR-26500Patras, Greece

    Received 23 January 1998; received in revised form 24 July 1998; accepted 12 August 1998

    Abstract

    The Greek coastal town of Egion on 15 June 1995 was shaken by a strong, small epicentral distance, earthquake that caused heavy

    damages to buildings and loss of life. The damages were concentrated in the central elevated part of the town whereas the at coastal regionremained almost intact. This non-uniform distribution of damage is studied in this article in terms of surface topography effects by

    conducting seismic response analyses of a simplied 2-D prole of the town. A dynamic nite element code implementing the equiva-

    lent-linear soil behavior (FLUSHPLUS) was used for the analyses and it was found that the step-like topography amplied greatly the

    intensity of motion without affecting its frequency content. The analyses showed that the motion recorded by an accelerograph installed at

    the center of the town is in agreement with the computed values; they also indicated a particularly intense amplication close to the crest of

    the steep slope, where a multi-story RC residential building partially collapsed. In contrast, the level of motion was found to be low at the at

    coastal zone of the town where the earthquake damages were insignicant. It is concluded that the characteristic surface topography of the

    town played an important role in modifying the intensity of base motion. q 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Seismic ground response; Topography effects; Site effects; Finite element method; Dynamic soil properties

    1. Introduction

    On 15 June 1995 a strong earthquake occurred in the

    vicinity of the western end of the Gulf of Corinth in Central

    Greece, Fig. 1. The epicenter of the earthquake was located

    in the sea between the coastal towns of Egion (in Northern

    Peloponnese) and Eratini (in Southern Sterea Hellas).

    Although the earthquake damages were spread in a rather

    extended area, the hardest hit town was that of Egion and for

    this reason the particular earthquake has since been known

    as the `Egion 1995 earthquake'. The occurrence of the

    Egion 1995 earthquake was followed by the appearances

    of almost all the phenomena usually studied under the

    general heading of `seismic ground response' i.e. amplica-tion and attenuation of base motion, effects of surface topo-

    graphy, ground ruptures, liquefaction and landslides. The

    main shock as well as the major events of the aftershock

    activity were recorded by an accelerograph installed at the

    center of the town and by similar instruments installed in a

    number of cities and towns surrounding the epicentral area.

    The damage pattern in Egion was not uniform and included

    partial collapse of buildings and loss of life.

    Following the destructive Egion 1995 earthquake severalresearchers [15,4,16] expressed the suspicion that the

    presence of the fault escarpment that runs through the

    town might be responsible for some amplication of the

    ground motion in the central part of the town. These suspi-

    cions were based on the existing knowledge on the subject,

    which is briey reviewed in the following.

    The effect of surface topography to the seismic ground

    response has been the subject of numerous studies during

    the last 25 years [17]. These studies have examined the

    cases of ridge-or valley- type surface irregularities in a 2-

    D form whereas only a limited number of results are avail-

    able for 3-D congurations of the problem (e.g. Shanchez-

    Sesma et al. [18]). Pioneering work on the subject wasaccomplished by Aki and Larner [19] who introduced a

    numerical method based on a discrete superposition of

    plane waves; this method was later extended by other inves-

    tigators [2022]. Useful results have also been reported by

    Wong and Trifunac [23], Wong [24] and Sanchez-Sesma et

    al. [25].

    Aki [26] used a simple structure of a wedge-shaped

    medium to illustrate the effects of topography, Fig. 2(a).

    An exact solution exists for SH waves propagating normal

    to the ridge and polarized parallel to the ridge axis, which

    predicts a displacement amplication at the vertex equal to

    Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149

    SDEE 2380

    0267-7261/99/$ - see front matter q 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

    PII: S0267-7261(98) 00041-4

    * Tel.: 1 61-997677; Fax: 1 61-997274;; e-mail: geolab.gaa

    @upatras.gr.

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    2/15

    2/v, where the ridge angle is np (0 , n, 2). Faccioli [27]

    used this triangular wedge structure to model approximatelyridge-valley topography, as shown in Fig. 2(b). This simple

    model predicts an amplication at the crest relative to the

    base equal to v1/v2 and may be used for rough numerical

    estimates of amplications at the crest of ridges or deam-

    plications at the bottom of valleys or canyons.

    The nite element method, which offers the advantage

    of being able to model irregularities of arbitrary shape

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149136

    Fig. 1. Map of the western part of the Gulf of Corinth (Greece) with the locations of Egion and other coastal towns and communities, the surface traces of the

    ve major normal faults of the region, the routes of the four major rivers (or streams) of the area and the approximate position of the 15 June 1995 epicenter.

    Fig. 2. Approximation of ridge/valley topography by triangular wedges

    [27].

    Fig. 3. Relative distribution of peak horizontal accelerations along a ridge

    from Matsuzaki area in Japan [33].

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    3/15

    involving inhomogeneous and non-linear soil materials, has

    also been used in studies of surface topography effects

    [28,29,17]. Some hybrid methods, combining a particlemodel with the nite element model have also been used

    for studying the surface topography effects [30]. In terms of

    physical modeling a photographic recording of particle

    motion in a 3-D foam rubber physical model has been

    used for studying the effects of topography at the Pacoima

    Dam site [31]. The results of the studies mentioned above

    (and of many others) indicate that the theoretically predicted

    values of amplication of motion in steep topography

    depend on the relative size of the irregularity (compared

    to the incident wave-length), the angle of incidence and

    the type of incident wave, i.e. SV vs. SH. Amplication

    values range from 3 to 4 in the spectral domain and areless than 2 in the time domain [32].

    In addition to the theoretical predictions, the amplica-

    tion of surface motion in ridge-or steep slope-type topo-

    graphy has also been veried from measurements during

    natural earthquake events. The diagram of Fig. 3 depicts

    the variation of normalized peak recorded horizontal accel-

    erations from ve earthquakes in Japan as a function of

    elevation across a ridge [33]. The normalization in this

    diagram is referred to the crest motion and in addition to

    the mean values, the standard error bars are also included in

    the graph. The measurements indicate an amplication at

    the crest (relatively to the base) varying from 1.8 to 5.5 with

    a mean value of 2.5. In terms of damage patterns, increasingdamages have been reported [34] along the slope and the top

    of hills after the Chile 1985 earthquake. A characteristic

    example of increased earthquake damages close to the

    crest of a step-like topography has been reported by Castel-

    lani et al. [28] for the case of the Irpinia 1980 earthquake

    and is illustrated in Fig. 4. In this case the damages of an

    Italian village sitting at the top of a hill, were concentrated

    close to the crest of a steep slope whereas they were insig-

    nicant in the direction away from the crest.

    It is worth mentioning that when comparing observed and

    theoretically predicted amplications of surface motions

    due to surface topography, it is usually found that the

    observed values are much greater than the predicted ones.

    Thus, the observed amplications range from 2 to 20 in thespectral domain and from 2 to 5 in the time domain. The

    difference between predicted and observed values is attrib-

    uted to the inuence of 3-D effects but it may also be due to

    the fact that the measured amplications are actually rela-

    tive amplications between points with amplied and

    diamplied motion [22].

    The article presents the results of a study regarding the

    possible effects of surface topography on the seismic ground

    response of the central part of the town of Egion. The

    ground motion was analysed by using a 2-D nite element

    code capable of modeling the surface relief and the strati-

    graphy of the area with the aim of explaining the contrast inearthquake damages between the central elevated part of

    town and the low and at waterfront area. Before proceed-

    ing to the presentation of the main subject, however, some

    information is given on seismological, geological, tectonic

    and geotechnical data as well as on earthquake damages.

    2. Seismological data

    The Egion earthquake occurred on 15 June 1995 at 3:16

    a.m. local time with a magnitude Ms 6.1 (or 6.2) and an

    epicenter lying in the Gulf of Corinth northeast of Egion,

    Fig. 1. There are minor deviations in the location of theepicenter of the main shock as reported by different sources

    [1 3]. Thus the value of the main shock-epicentral distance

    for Egion ranges from 8 to 26 km depending on the reported

    location of the epicenter. Also, the reported values of the

    focal depth range from 14 to 26 km [3,2]. The strongest

    aftershock of the sequence (ML 5.4) occurred 15 min

    after the main shock with a much shallower focus and

    smaller distance from the town of Egion, whereas the post

    earthquake activity was continued for several weeks with a

    trend of epicenters moving toward the Peloponnese coast-

    line [2]. The analysis of seismic data indicated the presence

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149 137

    Fig. 4. Effect of surface topography on damage distribution in the Irpinia (Italy) 1980 earthquake [28].

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    4/15

    of a normal causative fault with the following source para-

    meters: seismic moment M0 3.6 1025 dyn cm, fault

    length L 13.4 km, stress drop Ds 53 bars and average

    displacement u 0.85 m (Chouliaras and Stavrakakis [1]).

    An analog accelerograph (SMA-1) installed at the ground

    oor of a two-storey reinforced concrete building (with a

    basement) in the center of the town, (herein denoted as OTE

    site) recorded the strong motion of the main event. The time

    histories of the three components of motion (transverse

    longitudinalvertical) are shown in Fig. 5. The diagrams

    of Fig. 5, in addition to the measured values of acceleration,

    also include the calculated time histories of velocity and

    displacement as well as the acceleration response spectra

    (for 5% critical damping). The orientation of the horizontal

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149138

    Fig. 5. The acceleration time histories (Transverse, Longitudinal and Vertical components) recorded at the accelerograph station in Egion (OTE site), the

    calculated time histories of velocity and displacement, the corresponding acceleration response spectra (for 5% damping) and the orientation of the horizontal

    components of the accelerograph.

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    5/15

    components of the accelerograph is shown at the bottom of

    Fig. 5. The high intensity of the recorded horizontal ground

    motion at the OTE site is remarkable: a peak acceleration

    equal to 0.54 g in the T-component and 0.49 g in the L-

    component (probably the highest recorded values in

    Greece). However, the values of vertical acceleration

    remained lower than 0.20 g. According to the time history

    of recorded accelerations, the motion actually consisted of

    only one or two cycles of strong motion. In terms of hori-zontal ground velocity, it may be seen from the calculated

    time histories that the peak values were particularly high:

    for both horizontal components they approached the value

    of 50 cm/s. It may be further observed that the time history

    of horizontal ground velocities consist of a high intensity

    pulse involving an increment equal to 70 cm/s. It is worth

    mentioning at this point that high ground velocity (and velo-

    city increment) values are generated from shallow and near-

    eld earthquakes. In such cases the time history of ground

    motion bears the characteristics of the source and usually

    reveals directivity effects [4]. Fig. 6 shows the in-plan

    trajectory of accelerograph motion at the OTE site which

    was obtained by combining the T- and L-components of thecalculated displacements. It may be seen that the horizontal

    motion involved two major pulses: the rst in an approxi-

    mate EW direction and the second in an approximate NS

    direction.

    According to the acceleration response spectra of hori-

    zontal and vertical motion at the OTE site, shown in Fig. 5,

    the peak spectral acceleration of the T-component reached a

    value of 1.5 g with a predominant period of 0.5 s. It is

    believed that this value of period reects the characteristics

    of the source mechanism [4], whereas the period of a

    secondary spectral peak ( , 0.25 s) is most probably

    associated with the soil conditions at the site of accelero-

    graph station being equal to the fundamental period of

    ground at the OTE site. This value of the fundamental

    period may also be derived from the stratigraphy of the

    site (Fig. 13) as Ts (4 25)/400 0.25 s. The effective

    horizontal acceleration determined in accordance with the

    ATC (1978) provisions was found to be equal to 0.43 g

    (Lekidis et al. [3]).

    As mentioned in the introduction, the main shock of the

    Egion earthquake was also recorded in a number of loca-

    tions surrounding the epicentral region. Lekidis et al. [3]

    have studied the accelerograms from nine accelerograph

    stations installed at epicentral distances ranging from 18

    to 84 km. They concluded that the earthquake energy was

    anisotropically radiated from the source at a mean

    frequency of 2 Hz and with attenuation rate depending on

    the azimuth of the direction of propagation.

    3. Geology and tectonics of the area

    The area that was shaken by the Egion 1995 earthquakes

    lies at the western end of the asymmetric Corinth graben.

    This graben together with the Rio and Patras grabens form

    an 140 km long and 40 km wide rift which separates the Pre-

    Neogene folded basement of the Sterea Hellas and Pelepon-

    nese [57]. A simplied geologic prole of the region is

    shown in Fig. 7. The Pre-Neogene basement of the area

    consists of Mesozoic carbonates (limestones) and ysch

    and it is overlain by thick layers of marls deposited from

    Upper-Pliocene to Lower-Pleistocene. The marl deposits

    are in turn overlain by Quaternary alluvial fan depositsand fan delta deposits of considerable thickness (mostly

    conglomerates). Finally, the surcial layers consist of Holo-

    cene beach and river mouth deposits of variable thickness

    (gravel, sand, silt and clays).

    A number of north-facing WNW-trending active normal

    faults have been mapped in NW Peloponnese by Doutsos

    and Poulimenos [5]. Five of these faults are crossing the

    wider Egion area and their surface traces are shown in the

    map of Fig. 1 (Koukouvelas and Doutsos [8]). As shown in

    the simplied NS cross-section passing through the town

    of Egion, in Fig. 8, these faults have a curved listric geo-

    metry and reach depths of about 10 km. The segmented

    Egion fault has a total length of 12 km and its position ismarked by an escarpment 40100 m high along a 2 km long

    segment which runs through the town of Egion [9]. This

    escarpment forms a characteristic hill-front morphology

    along the coast of Egion Bay as shown in the photograph

    of Fig. 9. Some disagreement seems to exist regarding the

    causative fault of the Egion 1995 earthquake. Tselentis et al.

    [2] suggested that the main shock was probably generated in

    a normal fault at the north side of the Gulf of Corinth,

    dipping towards SSE (see Fig. 8) with a dip angle approxi-

    mately 708. The main aftershock was then generated in

    another normal fault (probably the Egion fault) dipping

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149 139

    Fig. 6. The in-plan trajectory of the horizontal ground motion at the OTE

    site during the main shock of 15 June 1995 Egion earthquake.

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    6/15

    towards NNE to the southern side of the Gulf. Koukouvelas

    and Doutsos [8] have reported the results of eld observa-tions of surface ruptures (with sizes of a few centimeters)

    and of geodetic measurements and suggest that the Egion

    fault was reactivated during the 1995 earthquakes. It has also

    been suggested that the focus of the earthquakes was hosted

    by a low angle normal fault (like the one depicted with dotted

    line in Fig. 8) cutting under the Gulf of Corinth and the town

    of Egion at depths ranging from 10 to 25 km [3,4,10].

    4. Geotechnical data

    It was mentioned in the previous section that a segment ofthe fault of Egion runs through the town of Egion in

    approximately EW direction and forms a characteristic

    escarpment. The map of Fig. 10 shows the Egion town limits

    and the horizontal extent of the escarpment. The major part

    of the town has been built south to the escarpment on the

    elevated region comprising the footwall of the fault. A

    representative soil prole of this elevated region and

    measured values of Standard Penetration Test blowcount

    (NSPT) are shown in Fig. 11, based on borings at the OTE

    site [11]. It may be seen that the depth to the conglomerates

    at this site is 22 m, whereas the overlying soil layers are

    stiff/dense clays, silts and gravels characterized by high

    values of NSPT. It should be noted that the water table was

    not encountered up to the explored depth of 45 m in this site;

    however some perched water tables have been found to exist

    in some areas of the elevated region of the town. Regarding

    the thickness of the conglomerates it is believed that at the

    OTE site might be greater than 150 m.

    As shown in Fig. 10 a relatively small part of the town has

    been built on the soft deposits of the coastal area lying to the

    north of the escarpment. The soil prole of this low-elevation at region is rather variable but the stratigraphy

    at the BH10 site [12] depicted in Fig. 12 may be considered

    as a representative case. The characteristic feature of this

    prole is the existence of a very soft clay layer character-

    ized by very low NSPT values encountered at a depth of

    10 m and having a thickness of 7 m. Silty sand-gravels are

    encountered above and below this soft layer and they are

    characterized by rather high values of NSPT. The explored

    depth at this site reached only 30 m from the ground surface

    so the depth to the conglomerates could not be established

    with certainty. It is believed, however, that this depth may

    range from 50 m to 60 m from the ground surface. Thewater table in this region of the town is high and it is

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149140

    Fig. 7. Geologic prole of the Egion area.

    Fig. 8. Simplied NS cross-section passing through the town of Egion and showing the geologic prole and the geometry of major faults of the area [5].

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    7/15

    encountered approximately 1.0 m below the surface of the

    ground.

    5. Earthquake damages

    It was mentioned in the introductory section that thedamages from the Egion 1995 earthquake were spread in

    an extended area around the epicenter of the earthquake. At

    least 20 communities located close to the north coast of

    Peloponesse to the east, south and west of Egion were

    affected, whereas some damages also occurred in the

    towns of Eratini and Itea located at the north coast of Gulf

    of Corinth across Egion (see map of Fig. 1). The hardest hit

    area, though, was that of Egion. The buildings of Egion area

    are either reinforced concrete structures with one to nine

    oors or bearing masonry structures with one to three oors.

    Fardis [13] has presented preliminary information regarding

    the distribution of damages among buildings with different

    age, type of construction and number of oors. A correlation

    of damage pattern with the local soil conditions has not yetbeen reported with the exception of the observation of a

    strong contrast in damages between the waterfront and the

    central area of the town. The absence of damages in the

    waterfront area of the town becomes more impressive

    when it is noted that in this area the buildings are very old

    (some already ruined) and without any seismic resistance

    provisions [13]. However, a large number of buildings

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149 141

    Fig. 9. Photographic view of the coastal region of Egion looking southward.

    Fig. 10. A simplied map of Egion showing the town limits, the extent of the elevated region and the location of points of interest and of the cross-section

    A AH

    .

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    8/15

    sitting in the elevated region of Egion, suffered heavy

    damages including the partial collapse of a six-storey rein-

    forced concrete residential building located at a small

    distance behind the fringe of the Egion fault escarpment

    (DESP site in Fig. 10). Partial collapses of reinforced

    concrete buildings also occurred in the village of Valimitika

    (four-storey Hotel ELIKI), about 7 km to the east of Egion

    and at a site 2 km west of Egion (three-storey Administra-

    tion Building of Hellenic Weapons Industry and a nearby

    two-storey residential building). Twenty-eight people lost

    their life in the earthquake whereas the total cost of damages

    was estimated to be $600 million [14]. It is worth mention-

    ing that the Egion 1995 earthquake did not result in damages

    to the infrastructure of the wider area (roadways, bridges,

    retaining walls, port facilities, etc.) It did result, however,

    limited soil liquefaction at several coastal sites of Egion

    Bay, along the banks of the Selinuntas and Kerynitis river

    and along the coastal zone of Rizomylos, Fig. 1. The conse-

    quences of soil liquefaction to buildings and other structures

    were not signicant and no further mention to soil liquefac-

    tion will be made in this article.

    6. Surface topography effects

    As was mentioned in the introduction, the main objective

    of this study was to investigate the possibility of explaining

    the differentiation of motion between the coastal area and

    the elevated region of the town of Egion by the effects of

    surface topography. The authors would like to make clear,

    though, that surface topography is only one of the factors

    that may be responsible for this differentiation of motion.

    According to the seismological data presented in a previous

    section the town of Egion is located in the near-eld of the

    event and the radiation pattern and directivity of motion

    have certainly affected the characteristics of the ground

    motions. However, it should be taken into considerationthat the Egion fault was (most probably), not the causative

    fault of the earthquake. Any attempt, then, to explain the

    differentiation of motion in the two regions of the town in

    terms of up-thrown and down-thrown blocks, may be ques-

    tionable. In view of the above uncertainties the authors

    believe that an investigation of surface topography effects

    is worthwhile and could provide some useful insights in the

    phenomenon.

    7. Surface topography at the town of Egion

    In order to study the effects of surface topography on theground seismic response at the town of Egion it was decided

    to use a 2-D ground prole which was established by

    considering a cross-section of the northern part of the

    town along the NS direction. This cross-section was

    made along the line AAH

    shown in the map of Fig. 10.

    The line AAH

    was selected in such a way as to intersect

    in a right angle the trace of the escarpment and to pass close

    to the accelerograph station (OTE site), close to the site of

    partial collapse of the RC building (DESP site) and through

    a site of the port area where the earthquake caused no

    damage (PORT site). The free surface prole along the

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149142

    Fig. 11. Geotechnical soil prole and corresponding values ofNSPT at the

    OTE site.

    Fig. 12. Geotechnical soil prole and corresponding values ofNSPT at the

    BH10 site.

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    9/15

    line A AH

    was constructed by reading distances and surface

    elevations from an 1:5000 topographic map of the regionand is shown in a simplied manner in the plot of Fig. 13.

    The soil stratigraphy along the 2-D prole was established

    by utilizing the geotechnical data presented in a previous

    section. As shown in Fig. 13 the established 2-D prole has

    a length of about 500 m and a height of 140 m below the

    OTE site and 70 m below the PORT site.

    7.1. Dynamic properties of soil materials

    The dynamic soil properties that are needed in an equiva-

    lent-linear type ground response analysis are the low-ampli-

    tude shear wave velocity, Vs0 and the G/G0gc and Dgccurves describing the degradation of soil shear stiffness

    with increasing amplitude of cycle shear strain, gc (G0

    low-amplitude shear modulus, i.e. for gc # 1025, G

    higher amplitude shear modulus). Values of Vs0 vs. depth

    at the DESP site were obtained by applying the Spectral

    Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) method [35]. As

    shown in the diagram of Fig. 14, a great depth of penetration

    of surface waves was achieved in this site by utilizing the

    drop of a heavy weight (5 kN) on the ground surface.

    According to the diagram of Fig. 14, the measured shearwave velocities are remarkably high indicating the great

    shear stiffness of soil formations at the elevated region of

    the town. For comparison purposes, the diagram of Fig. 14

    includes also plots of Vs0 versus depth from crosshole

    measurements conducted at the OTE site by the Central

    Laboratory of Public Works (CLPW) of the Ministry of

    Public Works and Environment [11]. Although the DESP

    and OTE sites are about 150 m apart, a good agreement

    seems to exist between the two Vs0 vs. depth proles. To

    check the reliability of an empirical Vs0NSPT correlation

    established by Athanasopoulos [36,37], the diagram of

    Fig. 14 includes also a plot ofVs0 vs. depth curve, estimatedby entering the values ofNSPT taken from Fig. 8 into Eq.(1)

    Vsom=s 107:6NSPT0:36

    : 1

    The comparison shows that the agreement is good, espe-

    cially when considering the empirical nature of Eq. (1).

    Based on the Vs0 vs. depth curves of Fig. 14 the soil strati-

    graphy and corresponding Vs0 values for the elevated region

    of the town of Egion were established as shown in the 2-D

    prole of Fig. 13.

    To establish the Vs0 vs. depth variation for the low-eleva-

    tion at coastal region of the town SASW measurements

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149 143

    Fig. 14. Vs0 versus depth prole at the OTE site with results of SASW and

    crosshole measurements compared with values obtained from Eq. (1).

    Fig. 13. Two-dimensional soil prole along the direction A AH

    with the Vs0 values used in the seismic ground response analyses.

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    10/15

    were conducted at the PORT site whose location is indicated

    in the map of Fig. 10. The diagram of Fig. 15 depicts the

    results of measurements. The penetration of surface waveswas smaller in this site and reached a depth of approxi-

    mately 90 m. It may be observed from Fig. 15 that the

    surcial soil layers at PORT site are characterized by low

    Vs0 values. Beyond a depth of 10 m, however, the values of

    Vs0 show an increasing trend with depth, whereas at a depth

    of about 50 m, an abrupt increase of Vs0 is observed (Vs0 .

    1000 m/s). Based on this abrupt increase, it may be assumed

    that the depth to conglomerates in this site is equal to 50 m.

    For comparison purposes the diagram of Fig. 15, also

    includes a Vs0 versus depth curve estimated from Eq. (1),

    by using the NSPT values taken from Fig. 12 for the BH10

    site, which is about 700 m to the west of PORT site. The

    rather large distance between the PORT and BH10 sitesseems to explain the deviations between the two curves.

    Based on the results of measurements depicted in Fig. 15

    the soil stratigraphy and corresponding Vs0 values for the

    coastal region of the town of Egion were established as

    shown in the 2-D prole of Fig. 13.

    As mentioned previously the description of the non-linear

    behavior of the soil materials of the 2-D model requires the

    knowledge of the G/G0gc and Dgc curves which are

    usually obtained through laboratory cyclic loading tests.

    No such experimental data are, however, available for the

    soils of Egion area and for this reason it was decided to

    resort to the empirical relations reported recently by Ishiba-

    shi and Zhang [38]. These relations allow the determination

    of G/G0gc and Dgc curves in terms of the plasticity

    index, Pl, and the mean effective normal stress, s0H

    , of a

    soil element. By taking into consideration two different

    mean depth levels, two sets of curves were determined for

    the PORT site and two more sets for the OTE site. The

    determinations were accomplished by using the recently

    developed PC program NOLISM [39]. All sets of curves

    (OTE1, OTE2 and PORT1, PORT2) are shown in graphic

    form in Fig. 16. It should be noted that the OTE2 set of

    curves refers actually to rock material and was established

    by utilizing the values frequently used for rock material in

    the 1-D seismic response program SHAKE91 [40].

    7.2. Seismic response analyses

    The seismic response analyses of the 2-D ground prole

    of Fig. 13 were performed by the 2-D dynamic nite

    element program FLUSHPLUS [41]. This PC programmodels soil as linear viscoelastic material and simulates

    the non-linear aspect of behavior by the iterative equivalent-

    linear method. It should be mentioned that one of the objec-

    tives of this study was to take into consideration the non-

    linear behavior of surcial soil layers which affects signi-

    cantly the ground response in the case of strong motion (as

    in the case of Egion earthquake). The input motion is

    applied at the rigid base of the model in the form of a

    time history of acceleration; this means that the program

    can only analyze the vertical propagation of shear waves

    from the seismic bedrock to the surface of the ground.

    The consideration of vertically propagating SV wavesconstitutes a simplication of the actual phenomenon, espe-

    cially in the case of near-eld events involving complex

    wave elds. In the case of Egion earthquake, though, the

    focal region of the main event seems to lie at a horizontal

    distance of about 20 km and at a depth of a similar magni-

    tude. By applying Snell's law and utilizing the shear wave

    velocities of soil strata (Fig. 13), it may be shown that at

    least a portion of the seismic waves arrived at the site inves-

    tigated herein following an approximately vertical direction.

    One of the advantages of the FLUSHPLUS code is its

    capability to use viscous dampers at the lateral boundaries

    of the mesh and thus avoid undesirable reections of

    outgoing waves. This feature makes possible the use ofnite element meshes with smaller lateral dimensions. The

    discretisation of the 2-D ground prole into nite elements

    is shown in Fig. 17. In the mesh of Fig. 17 the size of the

    nite elements (in particular the vertical dimension) was

    selected following the maximum size criteria suggested in

    the manual of the program. By using these criteria, the size

    of the nite elements remains (appropriately) smaller than

    the wavelengths which are expected to be developed during

    the passage of seismic waves through the particular soil

    formations comprising the 2-D prole of Fig. 13. It should

    be mentioned, however, that even in the case of conformance

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149144

    Fig. 15. Vs0 versus depth prole at the PORT site with results of SASW

    measurements compared with values obtained by applying Eq. (1) with

    NSPT values of the BH10 site.

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    11/15

    to the above mentioned maximum size criteria, the results of

    the analyses may still be affected by the density of the nite

    element mesh. The best way to determine the inuence of

    the nite element discretisation on the results of the analyses

    would be to conduct a convergence type of study in which

    the mesh is progressively rened until the results of the

    analyses do not change appreciably. A limited convergence

    study of this type was conducted herein by using two differ-

    ent F.E. meshes. It was found that a two-fold increase in the

    number of elements resulted in a 15% change in the

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149 145

    Fig. 16. G/G0gc and Dgc curves used in the seismic ground response analyses of the 2-D soil prole of Fig. 15.

    Fig. 17. Finite element discretization of the 2-D soil prole.

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    12/15

    response values without affecting their relative magnitudes.

    This change was considered as acceptable for the needs of

    the present investigation and it was therefore concluded that

    the nite element mesh of Fig. 17 provides reliable results.

    The nodes corresponding to the positions of PORT, DESP

    and OTE sites are also indicated in the mesh of Fig. 17.

    It should be mentioned that the surface topography effects

    were investigated in this study in terms of a horizonal base

    excitation only, although the FLUSHPLUS code allows the

    input of both horizontal and vertical components of base

    motion. This simplication was based on the fact that the

    peak value of vertical component of motion recorded at

    OTE site was a small fraction (37%) of the peak value

    corresponding to the vertical direction. Further, the majority

    of studies on surface topography effects are conducted in

    terms of horizontal base motions.

    One of the objectives of the study was to establish a base

    motion that when propagated through the 2-D model gener-

    ates a response at the OTE site similar to the one recorded

    during the main shock of 15 June 1995. In the case of 1-Danalyses this task (deconvolution) can be conveniently

    accomplished by using the SHAKE91 code (or other similar

    codes) which takes into account the non-linear behavior of

    soil materials. In the case of 2-D analysis of the present

    study the task of determining the base motion from the

    recorded surface motion at OTE site should be accom-

    plished by using a 2-D code offering the capabilities of

    the SHAKE91 code. Since such a code was not available

    to the authors at the time of writing the article the objective

    was accomplished by trial-and-error i.e. by providing at the

    base downscaled time histories at the recorded horizontal

    acceleration (T-component) at the OTE site. The frequencycontent of the input motion was kept identical to the

    frequency content of the recorded motion on the premise

    that the recorded accelerogram at the OTE site reects the

    characteristics of the source and was not modied in

    terms of frequency content by the soil stratigraphy and

    topography. By following this trial-and-error procedure it

    was found that a downscaled base motion with a peak hori-

    zontal acceleration equal to 0.14 g, was necessary in order to

    produce a response at the OTE site that approximately

    matched the recorded motion (T-component). A comparison

    of the computed and actually recorded time histories of

    accelerations at OTE site is shown in the diagram of Fig.

    18. This comparison indicates a good agreement betweenthe two time histories. A further comparison of the corre-

    sponding acceleration response spectra, however, shows a

    deviation of the computed value of peak spectral accelera-

    tion which is approximately 50% higher than the recorded

    one. There is no deviation, however, regarding the values of

    predominant period at computed and recorded horizontal

    motion. It should be noted that despite a large number of

    trials in some of which not only the intensity but also the

    frequency content of input motion was varied it was not

    possible to establish a horizontal base motion that produced

    a surface motion matching the recorded motion at the OTE

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149146

    Fig. 18. Computed seismic response at the OTE site from 2-D analyses

    compared to the recorded values in the 15 June 1995 Egion earthquake.

    Fig. 19. Computed seismic response at the DESP site from 2-D analyses.

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    13/15

    site in terms of both the time history and the response spec-

    trum. It was, therefore, decided to accept and use as an input

    motion the recorded horizontal acceleration time history at

    the OTE site (T-component) downscaled to a peak value of

    0.14 g. Based on the above results it is concluded that the

    motion at OTE site was greatly amplied with respect to thebase motion (amplication factor < 3.80). This amplica-

    tion of horizontal motion cannot be attributed to 1-D reso-

    nance, since the fundamental period of soil prole at OTE

    site is approximately equal to 0.25 s, whereas the predomi-

    nant period of input motion is 0.5 s. It seems, therefore,

    appropriate to assume that the 2-D topography of the area

    has resulted in the great differentiation of motion.

    By using the base input motion established above, the

    response at the DESP site was estimated and the results

    are shown in graphical form in Fig. 19. A very strong ampli-

    cation of motion is indicated at this site: the peak horizon-

    tal acceleration is equal to 0.79 g, whereas the spectral

    acceleration approached the value of 5 g with a predominantperiod equal to 0.5 s. Although these results may have been

    amplied by articial resonance effect an inherent

    problem in equivalent-linear seismic ground response

    analyses they still indicate a tendency for a strong ampli-

    cation of horizontal ground motion close to the crest of the

    slope. This trend seems to be in agreement with the results

    of eld observations reported in the Introduction (Fig. 4) and

    with the damage pattern observed in this region of the town

    partial collapse and heavy damages of RC buildings and

    discussed in a previous section.

    The response at the PORT site is shown in graphical form

    in Fig. 20 The results indicate a much lower level of hori-

    zontal motion: the peak horizontal acceleration is equal to

    0.25 g and the maximum spectral acceleration is equal to

    0.70 g with a predominant period at 0.5 s. These results are

    again in agreement with the impressive lack of damages in

    the waterfront area (including the undamaged Port facilities)

    of the town which was mentioned in a previous section. It is

    worth mentioning that the fundamental period at the PORT

    site may be estimated (from the stratigraphy shown in Fig.

    13) to be approximately equal to 0.5 s a value that almost

    coincides with the predominant period of the base motion.

    In case the wave eld was governed by a 1-D propagation, a

    resonance should have been developed and the surface

    motion at the PORT site could have been amplied (with

    respect to the base motion) to a greater degree compared to

    the OTE site. The fact that this trend was not observed in the

    results of response analyses of this study seems to indicate,

    again, that the surface response is governed by a 2-D propa-

    gation of seismic waves i.e. the surface topography has

    played a rather signicant role in modifying the groundmotion of the area.

    The results of the 2-D seismic response analyses that were

    presented above, seem to indicate a signicant surface topo-

    graphy effect on the ground response during the Egion 1995

    earthquake. Before reaching the nal conclusions, however,

    it would be appropriate to examine the capability of 1-D

    response analysis to duplicate the results obtained by the

    2-D analyses. To accomplish this check the program

    SHAKE91 was used to estimate the 1-D ground response

    at the sites of OTE and PORT. The dynamic soil properties,

    soil stratigraphy and depth to the base of each site were

    identical to the ones used in the 2-D analysis. By usingthis approach the peak horizontal acceleration at the OTE

    site was found to be equal to 0.69 g, a value that could be

    accepted as not being too far from the results of the 2-D

    analysis. At the PORT site, however, the surface accelera-

    tion reached a value equal to 0.53 g. This value is more than

    twice the value obtained by the 2-D analysis and it demon-

    strates the inability of 1-D analyses to predict the surface

    motion in this part of the town. It becomes, therefore, possi-

    ble at this point to summarize the ndings of this study and

    state the following conclusions.

    8. Conclusions

    The effects of surface topography in the Egion 1995

    earthquakes was studied by establishing a 2-D ground

    prole along a cross-section of the town. This section cuts

    through the central part of the town, has a NS direction and

    crosses in a right angle the fault escarpment that runs

    through the town in the EW direction. The response of

    the ground surface along the direction of the cross-section,

    was analysed by a nite element code and implementing the

    equivalent-linear method. It was found that the peak hori-

    zontal acceleration of the seismic base of the area does not

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149 147

    Fig. 20. Computed seismic response at the PORT site from 2-D analyses.

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    14/15

    need to be greater than 0.14 g in order to generate the

    recorded surface motion at the OTE site. This base motion

    was greatly amplied (290%) at the elevated region of thetown as shown schematically in Fig. 21(a) whereas at sites

    close to the fringe of the slope (DESP site) the amplication

    was even greater: 460%. This behavior seems to be in agree-

    ment with both theoretical results and eld measurements

    and observations presented in reviewing the existing knowl-

    edge on the subject as well as with the damage pattern in the

    town. By normalizing the surface motion with respect to the

    recorded motion at the OTE site Fig. 21(b), it may be seen

    that close to the fringe of the elevated region of the town the

    motion is amplied by 47% whereas it is deamplied by

    57%67% at the waterfront low-elevation at region. It is

    therefore concluded that the characteristic topography of the

    town played an important role in modifying the intensity ofbase motion.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors express their thanks to Drs G. Stavrakakis

    and I. Kalogeras of the Geodynamics Institute of the

    National Observatory of Athens, Greece, for providing

    accelerograph records for the Egion area in digital form.

    Thanks are also expressed to the Hellenic Earthquake Plan-

    ning and Protection Organization for the nancial assistance

    during the in situ measurement of dynamic soil properties in

    Egion area as well as to Mr P. Theodorou and to the Civil

    Engineering students at the University of Patras, D.

    Kostouros and N. Roumeliotis for their assistance during

    the in situ tests and in collecting maps of the Egion area.

    Finally, thanks are expressed to the anonymous reviewers of

    the article whose comments helped the authors to address

    some important issues and clarify some aspects of their

    approach of examining the surface topography effects.

    References

    [1] Chouliaras G, Stavrakakis GN. Seismic source parameters from a new

    dial-up seismological network in Greece. Pure and Applied Geophy-

    sics 1997;150:91111.

    [2] Tselentis G-A, Melis NS, Sokos E, Papatsimpa K. The Egion June,

    15, 1995 (6.2 ML).earthquake, Western Greece. Pure and Applied

    Geophysics. 1996;147:8398.

    [3] Lekidis V, Dimitriou P, Karakostas Ch, Kalogeras I, Margaris V,

    Theodoulidis N, Stavrakakis G. Consequenses of the June 1995

    Egion earthquake sequence seismological data, behavior of build-

    ings, damage description and adequacy of seismic coefcients. In:

    Proceedings of the 12th Hellenic concrete conference. Lemesos,

    Cyprus: Technical Chamber of Greece, vol. III, 1996, p. 30823 (in

    Greek)

    [4] Gazetas G. Soils dynamics and earthquake engineering: case

    histories. Athens: Symeon, 1996, p. 317 (in Greek)

    [5] Doutsos T, Poulimenos G. Geometry and kinematics of active faults

    and their seismotectonic signicance in the Western CorinthPatras

    rift (Greece). Journal of Structrual Geology 1992;14(6):689699.

    [6] Bernard P, Couliaras G, Tzanis A, Briole P, Bouin MP, Tellez J,

    Stavrakakis GN, Makropoulos K. Seismic and electrical anisotropy

    in the Mornos delta, gulf of Corinth, Greece and its relationship with

    GPS strain measurements. Geophysics Research Letters

    1997;24(17):22272230.

    [7] Chouliaras G, Pham VN, Boyer D, Bernard P, Stavrakakis GN .

    Crustal structure of the gulf of Corinth in Central Greece, determined

    from magnetotelluric soundings,. Annals of Geophysics

    1997;XL(1):6167.

    [8] Koukouvelas IK, Doutsos TT. Implications of structural segmentation

    during eartquakes: the 1995 Egion earthquake, Gulf of Corinth,

    Greece. Journal of Structural Geology 1996;18(12):13811388.

    [9] Roberts GP, Koukouvelas I. Structural and seismological segmenta-

    tion of the Gulf of Corinth fault system: implications for models of

    fault growth. Annali di Geosica 1996;39(3):619646.

    [10] Bernard P, Briole P, Meyer B, Lyon-Caen H, Gomez JM, Tiberi C,

    Berge C, Cattin R, Hatzfeld D, Lachet C, Lebrun B, Deschamps A,

    Courboulex F, Larroque C, Rigo A/fnm. , Massonnet D, Papadimi-

    triou P, Kassaras J, Diagourtas D, Makropoulos K, Veis G, Papazisi E,

    Mitsakaki C, Karakostas V, Papadimitriou E, Papanastasiou D, Chou-

    liaras M, Stavrakakis G. The Ms 6.2, June 15, 1995, Aigion earth-

    quake (Greece): evidence for low angle normal faulting in the Corinth

    rift. Journal of Seismology 1997;2:140.

    [11] Tsiabaos G, Sabatakakis N. Geotechnical investigations at Aegio city.

    In: Proceedings of International Scientic Symposium: Earthquake

    6.1R EgioGreece, 1995, (in abstract form), Egio, 1996.

    [12] Asproudas S, Geotechnical investigation at the site of Customs Build-

    ing, Port of Egion, Technical Report, 1984 (in Greek).

    [13] Fardis MN. A study and statistics of the Egion 15-6-1995 earthquake

    damages. In: Proceedings of International Scientic Symposium:

    Earthquake 6.1R EgioGreece, 1995, (in abstract form), Egio, 1996.

    [14] Carydis P, Holevas G, Lekkas E, Papadopoulos T. The Egion, Greece,

    earthquake of June 15, 1995, Earthquake Engineering Research

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149148

    Fig. 21. Effect of surface topography on the variation of peak horizontal

    accelerations along the cross-section AAH

    (a) amplication relatively to

    the base motion, (b) amplication and deamplication relatively to the OTE

    site motion.

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Response in the Egion

    15/15

    Centre, Newsletter (EERI) Special Earthquake Report, vol. 29, no. 7,

    Oakland, California, 1995.

    [15] Athanasopoulos GA, The Egion 1995 Earthquake: remarks on

    subjects of seismic ground response, Bulletin No. 1872. Technical

    Chamber of Greece, Sept. 1995, pp. 8891 (in Greek).

    [16] Lekkas E, Lozios S, Kranis H, Scourtsos E. Linear damage distribu-

    tion and seismic fractures at the Egio earthquake (15 June 1995,

    Greece). In: Manolis D, Beskos DE, Brebbia CA, editors. Proceed-

    ings of earthquake resistant engineering structures (ERES 96).Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1997, p. 37

    46

    [17] Athanasopoulos GA, Zervas S. Effects of ridge-like surface topogra-

    phy on seismic site response, Bath, UK. In: Carmak AS, Brebbia CA,

    editors. Proceedings of 6th international conference on soil dynamics

    and earthquake engineering, Computational Mechanics Publications,

    Southampton, 1993.

    [18] Sanchez-Sesma FJ, Chavez-Perez S, Aviles J. Scattering of elastic

    waves by three-dimensional topographies, proceedings of the 8th

    world conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, vol. II,

    1994, p. 63946

    [19] Aki K, Larner KL. Surface motion of a layered medium having an

    irregular interface due to incident plane SH-waves. Journal of

    Geophysical Research 1970;75:19211941.

    [20] Bouchon M. Effect of topography on surface motions. Bulletin of theSeismological Society of America 1973;63(3):615632.

    [21] Bard P-Y. Diffracted waves and displacement eld over two-dimen-

    sional elevated Topographies. Journal of Royal Astronomy Society

    1982;71:731760.

    [22] Geli L, Bard PY, Jullien B. The effect of topography on earthquake

    ground motion: a review and new results. Bulletin of the Seismolo-

    gical Society of America, vol. 78: (1), 1988, p.4263

    [23] Wong HL, Trifunac MD. Scattering of plane SH-wave by a semiel-

    liptical canyon. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Soil

    Dynamics 1974;3:157169.

    [24] Wong HL. Effect of surface topography on the diffraction of P, SV

    and Rayleigh waves. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of Amer-

    ica 1982;72:11671183.

    [25] Sanchez-Sesma, FJ, Bravo MA, Herrera J. Surface motion of topo-

    graphical irregularities for incident P, SV, Rayleigh waves. Bulletinof the Seismological Society of America 1985;75:263269.

    [26] Aki K, Local site effects on strong ground motion. In: Van Thun JL,

    editors. Earthquake engineering and soil dynamics recent

    advances in ground-motion evaluation. ASCE Geotechnical Special

    Publication, no. 20, 1988, p. 10355

    [27] Faccioli E, Seismic amplication in the presence of geological and

    topographic irregularities. In: Proceedings of the second interna-

    tional conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake

    engineering and soil dynamics. St Louis, Missouri, vol. II, 1991,

    p. 177997.

    [28] Castellani A, Chesi C, Peano A, Sardella L, Seismic response of

    topographic irregularities. In: Cakmak AS, Abdel-Ghaffar AM, Breb-

    bia CA. Balkema/Rotterdam, editors. Proceedings of soil dynamics

    and earthquake engineering conference, Southampton, July, 1982,

    vol. 1, 1982, p. 251268.

    [29] Castellani A, Peano A, Sardella L, Seismic response of topographic

    irregularities. In: Proceedings of the third international earthquake

    microzonation conference, Seattle, vol. II, 1982, p. 53340.

    [30] Ohtsuki A, Yamahara H, Effect of topography and subsurface inho-

    mogeneity on seismic SV waves and Rayleigh waves. In: Proceedings

    of the eighth world conference on earthquake engineering. San Fran-

    cisco, vol. II, 1984, pp. 65562.[31] Brune JN, Preliminary results on topographic seismic amplication

    effect on a foam rubber model of the topography near Pacoima Dam.

    In: proceedings of the eighth world conference on earthquake engi-

    neering, San Francisco, vol. II, 1984, p. 6639.

    [32] Finn LWD, Site conditions and seismic response. In: Proceedings of

    the international symposium, on the effects of surface geology on

    seismic motion (ESG 1992). Odawara, Japan, vol. I, 1984, p. 331

    [33] Jibson R, Summary of research on the effects of topographic ampli-

    cation of earthquake shaking on slope stability. US Geological

    Survey, Open-le Report 87-268, Menlo Park, California, 1987.

    [34] Celebi M. Topographical and geological amplications determined

    from strong motion and aftershock records of the 3 March 1985 Chile

    earthquake,. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1987;

    88(4):11471167.

    [35] Athanasopoulos GA, Pelekis PC. Reliability estimations of an approx-imate SASW method. In: Proceedings of the XIV international

    conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Hamburg,

    vol. 1. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1997, p. 4458.

    [36] Athanasopoulos GA. An empirical correlation Vs0-NSPT and an

    evaluation of its reliability. In: Proceedings of second international

    conference on earthquake resistant construction and design, ERCAD

    94, Berlin, 1994, p. 21926.

    [37] Athanasopoulos GA. Empirical correlations Vs0-NSPT for soils of

    Greece: a comparative study of reliability. In: Cakmak AS, Brebbia

    CA, editors. Proceedings of seventh international conference on soil

    dynamics and earthquake engineering, Chania, Crete, Greece. South-

    ampton: Computational Mechanics Publications, 1995, pp. 1926.

    [38] Ishibashi I, Zhang X. Unied dynamic shear moduli and damping

    ratios of sand and clay. Soils and Foundations 1993;33(1):182191.

    [39] Athanasopoulos GA, Panagiotakos TB, Maravegias SA. Nolism: a PCprogram for the evaluation of parameters describing the non-linear

    dynamic behavior of soil materials. Journal of Computers and Geo-

    sciences, in press.

    [40] SHAKE91, A computer program for Conducting Equivalent-linear

    seismic response analyses for horizontally layered soil deposits. A

    modied PC version of the original SHAKE program published in

    1972 by Schnabel, Lysmer and Seed (modications made by Idriss

    IM, Sum JI). Berkley, University of California: EERI, 1992.

    [41] FLUSHPLUS, A computer program for approximate 3-D analysis of

    soilstructure interaction problems. An enhanced PC version of the

    original FLUSH program published in 1975 by Lysmer J, Udaka T,

    Tsai C-F, Seed HB (program conversion and modication by Deng

    N). Berkley, University of California: EERi, 1993.

    G.A. Athanasopoulos et al. / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18 (1999) 135149 149