Effect of salinity and temperature on thermal tolerance of brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus...
-
Upload
ana-denisse-re -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
4
Transcript of Effect of salinity and temperature on thermal tolerance of brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus...
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0306-4565/$ - se
doi:10.1016/j.jth
�CorrespondOrganismos Ac
ina, Centro de I
de Ensenada. (
92143-4844, US
E-mail addr
Journal of Thermal Biology 30 (2005) 618–622
www.elsevier.com/locate/jtherbio
Effect of salinity and temperature on thermal toleranceof brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus (Ives)
(Crustacea, Penaeidae)
Ana Denisse Rea, Fernando Diaza,�, Elizabeth Sierraa,Juan Rodrıguezb, Estela Perezb
aLaboratorio de Ecofisiologıa de Organismos Acuaticos, Departamento de Biotecnologıa Marina, Centro de Investigacion Cientıfica y de
Educacion Superior de Ensenada. (CICESE), Km. 107 Carretera Tijuana-Ensenada, Ensenada BC, MexicobLaboratorio Acuario, Departamento de Biologıa, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. (UNAM),
Mexico DF 04510, Mexico
Received 5 May 2005; accepted 7 September 2005
Abstract
The critical thermal maxima (CTMax) of Farfantepenaeus aztecus was not affected significantly by salinity (P40:05).A direct relationship was obtained between the critical temperature and the acclimation temperature which increased at
intervals of 3–5 1C.
The end point of CTMax in F. aztecus was loss of righting response (LRR).
The acclimation response ratio (ARR) for the juveniles of the brown shrimp ranged between 0.20 and 0.80, which
agreed with others obtained for crustaceans from tropical and subtropical climates.
The brown shrimp should not be exposed to conditions that cause total disorientation; if this is avoided, it will permit
an increase in growth and reduce mortalities in culture populations.
r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Critical thermal maxima; Salinity; Temperature; Acclimation response ratio; Farfantepenaeus aztecus
1. Introduction
The aquatic environment is thermally heterogeneous
in space and time. Animals living in changing environ-
ments possess physiological and behavioral mechanisms
allowing them to live successfully, at least within certain
e front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserve
erbio.2005.09.004
ing author at: Laboratorio de Ecofisiologıa de
uaticos, Departamento de Biotecnologıa Mar-
nvestigacion Cientıfica y de Educacion Superior
CICESE), P.O. Box 434844, San Diego, CA
A. Fax: 52 (646) 175 05 69.
ess: [email protected] (F. Diaz).
limits. They also have the capacity of resisting extreme
temperatures for limited periods, which constitute an
expansion of their environmental space (Hutchison and
Maness, 1979).
Many species of commercial importance live in
lagoon–estuarine habitats that sustain the main fisheries
of the continental platform. Among these, the penaeid
shrimps are a source of commercial importance (Ven-
kataramiah et al., 1974; Yanez-Arancibia, 1986).
The penaeid shrimps mature and reproduce in the
open sea, the postlarva stages penetrate to the lagoon–
estuarine systems where growth occurs until they
become juveniles and preadults (Williams, 1960). In
d.
ARTICLE IN PRESSA.D. Re et al. / Journal of Thermal Biology 30 (2005) 618–622 619
these environments the organisms are exposed to daily
and seasonal fluctuations of diverse environmental
factors, especially salinity and temperature. Shrimps
respond to these variations as a highly integrated unit,
tolerating those environmental changes (Vernberg and
Vernberg, 1972; Venkataramiah et al., 1974; Prosser,
1991).
Salinity and temperature modify the physiological
responses of aquatic organisms; these factors in the
lagoon–estuarine ecosystems determine distribution and
survival. Salinity is a masking factor that modifies
numerous physiological responses such as metabolism,
growth, life of cycle, nutrition and intra-and inter-
specific relationships (Kinne, 1971; Fry, 1971; Venka-
taramiah et al., 1974).
Temperature is a direct and controlling factor of the
aquatic organism’s activity and, therefore mobile species
including the crustaceans show different behavioral
responses which include the selection of a thermal
habitat and avoidance of lethal temperatures (Reynolds,
1979; Giattina and Garton, 1982).
All life cycle stages must be considered to respond to
thermal acclimation that results in physiological com-
pensatory temperature responses and adaptative resis-
tance changes allowing a thermal niche expansion.
Temperature can be a limiting factor in the distribution
of an aquatic organism if they are exposed to the
resistance zone represented by the critical thermal
minima and maxima (Dıaz Herrera et al., 1998).
The critical thermal maxima is a characteristic
modified by acclimation temperature and therefore,
useful in evaluating the thermal requirements of an
organism’s physiological status (Becker and Genoway,
1979; Paladino et al., 1980; Lutterschmidt and Hutch-
ison, 1997).
The critical thermal maxima (CTMax) was defined by
Cowles and Bogert (1944), modified by Lowe and Vance
(1955) and standardized by Hutchison (1961). Cox
(1974) defined CTMax as follows: ‘‘these tolerance
measurements as the arithmetic mean of the collective
thermal points at which locomotory activity becomes
disorganized’’. This is when the animal loses its ability to
escape from conditions that will promptly lead to its
death. When heated from a previous acclimation
temperature at a constant rate just fast enough to allow
deep body temperatures to follow environmental tem-
peratures without a significant time lag.
The knowledge of the CTMax provides a relevant
physiological and ecological index; the brown shrimp in
lagoon–estuarine systems may encounter such tempera-
tures either daily and seasonally. CTMax may occur at
different temperatures in different species, but the
physiological responses are same across a diversity of
taxa (Lutterschmidt and Hutchison, 1997). For these
reasons critical thermal maxima is an excellent index for
evaluating the thermal requirements and physiology of
aquatic organisms (Becker and Genoway, 1979; Paladi-
no et al., 1980).
According to Claussen (1977), ARR is defined as
DCTMax/DT or change in the CTMax per change in
acclimation temperatures. It can be considered as a
reliable measure to denote the physiological response of
aquatic organisms to a given change in temperature.
It is important to evaluate the interactions of two or
more variables on the functional responses of the
aquatic organisms if these variables interact, since these
studies provide information about the adaptative and
physiological potentialities of the organisms exposed to
different environmental factors. In the Gulf of Mexico
three endemic species of shrimps, Farfantepenaeus
aztecus, Litopenaeus setiferus and Farfantepenaeus duor-
arum, are distributed. These species have potential for
culture; however, basic physiological studies are neces-
sary to implement the culture of these species are few.
The goal of this study was to determine the critical
thermal limits and their Acclimation Response Ratio
(ARR) of juveniles of brown shrimp F. aztecus exposed
to different combinations of temperature and salinity to
assess the ability of organisms to adapt to different
thermal and salinity regimens in a tropical area of Gulf
of Mexico.
2. Materials and methods
Juveniles of F. aztecus (n ¼ 400) were recollected in
the Northern part of the Lagoon of Tamiahua,
Veracruz, the water temperature was 25 1C and salinity
was in the a range of 25–30%. The shrimps were
transported to the laboratory in plastic bags with water
from the lagoon and a saturated atmosphere of oxygen.
The organisms were placed in a 3000 l reservoir,
provided with a biological filter at 25 1C and salinity
of 30%, for 1 week to diminish the stress caused by
transport.
From the original stock 320 juveniles were selected
(4.5–8.5 g weight wet), and placed in 15 reservoirs of 120
liters provided with a biological filter and constant
aeration. The experimental salinities were 10, 15, 20, 25
and 3071%, which were made by diluting filtered sea
water with tap water, the rate of decreased of salinity
was 2% daily until we obtained experimental salinities.
The experimental temperatures were 20, 25 and
3071 1C, which were maintained by 500W heaters
connected to temperature regulator provided with a
thermocouple, the increased and decreased rate of
temperature was 2 1C per day. Once salinities and
experimental temperatures were reached, juveniles re-
mained in those conditions for 21 days. The photoperiod
was maintained in 12 h light/12 h dark.
The organisms were fed daily with two rations at 10%
of weight wet with commercial food (Camaronina
ARTICLE IN PRESSA.D. Re et al. / Journal of Thermal Biology 30 (2005) 618–622620
Purina) with 35% of protein. The food remainder, feces
and molts were extracted daily from the reservoirs by
siphoning.
The CTMax of 320 juveniles of brown shrimp from
different combinations of salinity and temperature as
determined. Each shrimp was placed in a 1-l glass flask
provided with constant aeration, the experimental
salinity at which the organisms were acclimated, and
then they were introduced into 40 l aquarium provided
with 1000W immersion heater and permanent aeration
to maintain a uniform temperature. The water was
maintained at the experimental temperature for 30min
to reduce the stress produced by handling Perez et al.
(2003), determinations of CTMax were done between
9:00 and 14:00 h. The heating rate used was 1 1Cmin�1
(Lutterschmidt and Hutchison, 1997). The end point for
CTMax was Loss of Righting Response (LRR) when the
shrimp was on its back and could not recover its upright
posture, or remains reclined at 901 (Nelson and Hooper,
1982). When the shrimps reached this point they were
returned to their acclimation salinity and temperature
conditions. The organisms were used only once and the
data for the animals which did not recover after
returning them to their acclimation salinity and tem-
perature after LRR were discarded.
In the brown shrimp, we determined ARR defined by
Claussen (1977) as DCTMax/DT or the change in the
CTMax per degree change in acclimation temperature.
A two-way analysis of variance was used as previous
determination of the normality and homoscedasticity of
the data (Sigma Stat Version 3.1) to determine the effect
of salinity and temperature on the thermal tolerance of
the brown shrimp.
3. Results and discussion
The critical thermal maxima of the shrimps were not
changed when salinity was increased from 10 to 30%,
but when acclimation temperature was increased from
Table 1
Critical thermal maxima (CTMax) of juveniles of brown shrimp
temperatures expressed to the nearest degree
Temperature (1C) Salinities (%)
10 15
20 38 37
(37.8–38.3) (36.5–37.5)
25 39 39
(38.5–39.5) (38.8–39.2)
30 41 42
(40.7–41.3) (41.8–42.2)
The underline between groups indicates a similar effect to the salinit
parenthesis.
20 to 30 1C the thermal tolerance of juveniles was
increased by 3–5 1C (Table 1). An analysis of variance
indicated that the temperature had a significant effect
(Po0:05) on the CTMax but the effect of salinity and
the interaction temperature-salinity was not significant
(P40:05). Becker and Genoway (1979), Paladino et al.
(1980), and Beitinger et al. (2000) mention that the
critical thermal maxima is considered as a measure of
thermal tolerance of the aquatic organisms and is
determined by raising the temperature progressively
from the acclimation temperature until LRR, occurs in
response to the thermal stressor. We considered the end
point of CTMax in brown shrimp as LRR, the pre-death
thermal point at which locomotory movements become
disorganized due to neuromuscular blockade and pre-
synaptic failure, and shrimps lose the ability to escape
the conditions which may ultimately lead to death
(White, 1983; Beitinger et al., 2000).
In other species of crustaceans as Palaemonetes
kadiakensis, Procambarus clarkii, Macrobrachium tenel-
lum, M. rosenbergii and M. acanthurus (Nelson and
Hooper, 1982; Dıaz et al., 1994; Hernandez et al., 1996;
Dıaz Herrera et al., 1998; Dıaz et al., 2002) reported a
direct relationship between the CTMax and acclimation
temperature as obtained in F. aztecus. Paladino et al.
(1980) emphasized the importance of determining the
CTMax in aquacultural practices with aquatic organ-
isms since it is an indicator of the thermal tolerance of
brown shrimp and it allows the identification of the
temperature at which the first sign of stress occurs.
Salinity did not cause a significant effect on thermal
tolerance of brown shrimp, similar results were obtained
for Criales and Chung (1980) in juveniles of pink shrimp
(Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis), and both shrimp species
are characterized by a wide tolerance to salinity.
Hernandez and Dıaz (1995) obtained an osmoregulation
pattern for F. aztecus from Tamiahua, Veracruz when
exposed to different combinations of salinity and
temperature, and had a hypo-osmoregulation capacity
higher salinities and hyper-osmoregulation in lower
Farfantepenaeus aztecus acclimated to different salinities and
20 25 30
38 38 39
(37.6–38.4) (37.1–38.9) (38.5–39.5)
40 40 38
(39.4–40.6) (39.3–40.7) (37.8–38.2)
42 42 42
(41.5–42.5) (41.6–42.4) (41.3–42.7)
y (P40:05). Median values and confidence intervals (95%) in
ARTICLE IN PRESSA.D. Re et al. / Journal of Thermal Biology 30 (2005) 618–622 621
salinity. Therefore, they can be characterized as strong
osmoregulators, because they adapt rapidly to the new
salinities by increasing and decreasing hemolymph
osmotic concentration.
We calculated the ARR, according to Claussen (1977)
as a convenient index of thermal acclimation, the values
of CTMax of F. aztecus exposed to different combina-
tions of salinity and temperature was 0.3, 0.5, 0.4, 0.45,
and 0.3 for the five salinity groups. In different
crustaceans from cold waters such as Orconectes
rusticus, Claussen (1980) obtained a value of 0.24 and
in O. virilis of 0.15, Layne et al. (1987) reported ARR in
O. rusticus values between 0.23 and 0.25. McLesse
(1956) in postlarvae of the lobster (Homarus americanus)
obtained an ARR of 0.24. In Procambarus clarkii, a
crayfish that is distributed in temperate-warm areas, the
calculated ARR was 0.33 (Dıaz et al., 1994). In
Macrobrachium tenellum a subtropical species the
ARR calculated was 0.54 (Hernandez et al., 1996).
ARR range for postlarvae of M. rosenbergii a tropical
species was 0.45–0.63 for juveniles 0.45–0.55 (Dıaz
Herrera et al., 1998). In M. acanthurus a subtropical
prawn, the values obtained by Dıaz et al. (2002) for
ARR was of 0.33–0.52.
For different species of crustaceans the presented data
for ARR suggest that subtropical and tropical species
have higher ARR. Perez et al. (2004) reported similar
tendency in different species of fish of different habitats.
This response is typical of aquatic poikilotherms. The
species that inhabit temperate and cold regions experi-
encing gradual long-term temperature fluctuations
would have the time necessary to make metabolic
adjustments that would result in nonsubstantial shifts
in tolerance ranges. On the contrary, subtropical and
tropical species that experience their greatest thermal
extremes over short periods should have broad ranges of
tolerance to survive the relatively rapid changes in water
temperature, without time for acclimation, to adjust
their tolerance (Johnson and Kelsch, 1998). However, it
should be considered that higher ARR values may be
found in species living in (or reproducing in) estuarine
conditions.
Knowledge about the thermal requirements in a
commercial species such as brown shrimp is useful in
allowing the determination of the selection of places for
intensive aquaculture, and permits growth and low
mortality.
References
Becker, C.D., Genoway, R.G., 1979. Evaluation of the critical
thermal maximum for determining thermal tolerance of
freshwater fish. Env. Biol. Fish. 4, 245–256.
Beitinger, T.L., Bennett, W.A., McCauley, R.W., 2000.
Temperature tolerance of North American freshwater fishes
exposed to dynamic changes in temperature. Env. Biol.
Fish. 58, 237–275.
Claussen, D.L., 1977. Thermal acclimation in ambystomatid
salamanders. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 58A, 333–340.
Claussen, D.L., 1980. Thermal acclimation in the crayfish
Orconectes rusticus and O. virilis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.
66A, 377–384.
Cowles, R.B., Bogert, C.M., 1944. A preliminary study of the
thermal requirements a desert reptile. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat.
Hist. 83, 265–296.
Cox, D.K., 1974. Effect of three heating rates on the critical
thermal maximum of bluegill. In: Gibbons, J.W., Sharitz,
R.R. (Eds.), Thermal Ecology. AEC Symposium Series
(Conf-73055), Springfield, VA, pp. 150–163.
Criales, M.M., Chung, K.S., 1980. Tolerancia termica en
postlarvas y juveniles del camaron rosado Penaeus brasi-
liensis. Informes Museo del Mar 27, 1–15.
Dıaz, H.F., Espina, S., Buckle, R.L.F., 1994. Thermal stress
responses of Procambarus clarkii. Riv. Ital. Acquacol. 29,
149–154.
Dıaz Herrera, F., Sierra, U.E., Buckle, R.L.F., Garrido, M.A.,
1998. Critical thermal maxima and minima of Macrobra-
chium rosenbergii (Decapoda:Palemonidae). J. Therm. Biol.
23, 381–385.
Dıaz, F., Sierra, E., Re, A.D., Rodrıguez, L., 2002. Behavioural
thermoregulation and critical thermal limits of
Macrobrachium acanthurus (Wiegman). J. Therm. Biol. 27,
423–428.
Fry, F.E.J., 1971. The Effect of Environmental Factors on the
Physiology of Fish. In: Hoar, W.S., Randall, D.J. (Eds.),
Fish Physiology Vol VII: Environmental Relations and
Behaviour. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–98.
Giattina, J.R., Garton, R.R., 1982. Graphical model of
thermoregulatory behavior by fishes with a new
measure of eurythermality. Can. J. Fish. Aquatic. Sci. 39,
524–528.
Hernandez, R.M., Dıaz, H.F., 1995. Interaccion de la
temperatura y la salinidad sobre la excrecion de amonio y
osmorregulacion en Penaeus aztecus (Crustacea:Peneidae).
Caribb. J. Sci. 31, 284–288.
Hernandez, R.M., Buckle, R.L.F., Dıaz, F., 1996. Critical
thermal maximum of Macrobrachium tenellum. J. Therm.
Biol. 21, 139–143.
Hutchison, V.H., 1961. Critical thermal maxima in salaman-
ders. Physiol. Zool. 34, 92–125.
Hutchison, V.M., Maness, J.D., 1979. The role of behavior in
temperature acclimation and tolerance in ectotherms. Am.
Zool. 19, 367–384.
Johnson, J.A., Kelsch, S.W., 1998. Effects of evolutionary
thermal environment on temperature preference relation-
ship in fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 53, 447–458.
Kinne, O., 1971. Salinity: Animal invertebrates. In: Kinne, O.
(Ed.), Marine Ecology Vol I. Environmental Factors. Wiley
Interscience, London, pp. 821–995.
Layne, J.R., Claussen, D.L., Manis, M.L., 1987. Effects of
acclimation temperature, season and time of day on the
critical thermal maxima and minima of the crayfish
Orconectes rusticus. J. Therm. Biol. 12, 183–187.
Lowe Jr., C.H., Vance, V.J., 1955. Acclimation of the critical
thermal maxima of the reptile Urosaurus ornatus. Science
122, 73–74.
ARTICLE IN PRESSA.D. Re et al. / Journal of Thermal Biology 30 (2005) 618–622622
Lutterschmidt, W.I., Hutchison, V.H., 1997. The critical
thermal maximum: history and critique. Can. J. Zool. 75,
1561–1574.
McLesse, D.W., 1956. Effects of temperature salinity and
oxygen on survival of the American lobster. J. Fish. Res.
Bd. Can. 13, 247–272.
Nelson, D.H., Hooper, D.K., 1982. Thermal tolerance and
preference of the freshwater shrimp Palaemonetes kadia-
kensis. J. Therm. Biol. 7, 183–187.
Paladino, F.V., Spotila, J.R., Schubauer, J.P., Kowalski, K.T.,
1980. The critical thermal maximum: a technique used to
elucidate physiological stress and adaptation in fishes. Rev.
Can. Biol. 39, 115–122.
Perez, E., Dıaz, F., Espina, S., 2003. Thermoregulatory
behavior and critical thermal limits of the angelfish
Pterophyllum scalare (Lichtenstein) (Pisces:Cichlidae). J.
Therm. Biol. 28, 531–537.
Prosser, C.L., 1991. Environmental and Metabolic Animal
Physiology. Wiley-Liss, New York 578 pp.
Reynolds, W.W., 1979. Perspectives and introduction to the
symposium: thermoregulation in ectotherms. Am. Zool. 19,
193–194.
Venkataramiah, A., Lakshmi, G.J., Gunter, G., 1974. Studies
on the effects of salinity and temperature on the commercial
shrimp, Penaeus aztecus Ives, with special regard to survival
limits growth, oxygen consumption and ionic regulation.
Gulf Coast Research Laboratory. Ocean Springs, Missis-
sippi 134 p.
Vernberg, W.B., Vernberg, F.J., 1972. Environmental Physiol-
ogy of Marine Animals. Springer, New York 346 pp.
White, R., 1983. Effects of acute temperature change and
acclimation temperature on neuromuscular function and
lethality in crayfish. Physiol. Zool. 56, 174–194.
Williams, A.B., 1960. The influence of temperature on osmotic
regulation in two species of estuarine shrimps (Penaeus).
Biol. Bull. 119, 560–571.
Yanez-Arancibia, A., 1986. Ecologıa de la Zona Costera:
Analisis de siete topicos. AGT Editor, Mexico 189 pp.