Effect of particle loss on soil behaviour€¦ · Effect of particle loss on soil behaviour 6th ......

20
Effect of particle loss on soil behaviour 6 th International Conference on Scour and Erosion Research student: Darren Kelly Supervisors: Dr John McDougall, Dr Daniel Barreto

Transcript of Effect of particle loss on soil behaviour€¦ · Effect of particle loss on soil behaviour 6th ......

  • Effect of particle loss on soil

    behaviour

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

    Research student: Darren Kelly

    Supervisors: Dr John McDougall, Dr Daniel Barreto

  • Introduction

    Soil can experience particle loss through degradation, dissolution, and erosion.

    Research aim

    To examine the volumetric and strength changes that occur in a soil experiencing particle

    loss with special focus on the size and percentage of single sized particles.

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • Leighton Buzzard

    0.063mm salt

    1.0mm salt

    • Oedometer tests – mixtures of Leighton Buzzard sand

    and salt

    o salt particle size (0.063, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 & 1.0

    mm)

    o amount (2%, 5%, 10% & 15%)

    o two vertical stresses (62 & 250 kPa). 40 tests.

    • Triaxial tests – mixtures of Leighton Buzzard sand and

    salt

    o salt particle size (0.063, 0.25, 0.5 & 1.0 mm)

    o amount (15%)

    o stresses (42, 84 & 168 kPa).

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • 6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • 0.20

    0.30

    0.40

    0.50

    0.60

    0.70

    0.80

    0.90

    0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25

    Vo

    id rati

    o

    Salt particle size (mm)

    Oed pre-diss (p' = 42 kPa)

    Oed pre-diss (p' = 168 kPa)

    Oed post-diss (p' = 42 kPa)

    Oed post-diss (p' = 168 kPa)

    emax(LBS)

    emin(LBS)

    0.20

    0.30

    0.40

    0.50

    0.60

    0.70

    0.80

    0.90

    0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25V

    oid

    rati

    oSalt particle size (mm)

    Triaxial pre-diss

    Triaxial post-diss

    emax(LBS)

    emin(LBS)

    3 no.2 no.

    •Good agreement between oedometric and triaxial tests

    •Void ratio change with dissolution independent of initial void ratio, particle size removed

    or applied stress.

    dissolution dissolution

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • 0.0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    1.6

    2.0

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Stre

    ss r

    atio

    , q/p

    '

    Axial strain, εa

    Sand reference

    tests

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • 0.0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    1.6

    2.0

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Stre

    ss r

    atio

    , q/p

    '

    Axial strain, εa

    0.063 mm particles (15%)

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • 0.0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    1.6

    2.0

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Stre

    ss r

    atio

    , q/p

    '

    Axial strain, εa

    0.25 mm particles (15%)

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • 0.0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    1.6

    2.0

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Stre

    ss r

    atio

    , q/p

    '

    Axial strain, εa

    0.5 mm particles (15%)

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • 0.0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    1.6

    2.0

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Stre

    ss r

    atio

    , q/p

    '

    Axial strain, εa

    •Good convergence of strength data

    •Post dissolution strength behaviour depends on the particle size removed

    •Loose sand sample preparation

    1.0 mm particles (15%)

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • -0.1

    -0.08

    -0.06

    -0.04

    -0.02

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Vo

    lum

    etri

    c st

    rain

    , ε

    v

    Axial strain, εa

    Sand reference tests

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • -0.1

    -0.08

    -0.06

    -0.04

    -0.02

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Vo

    lum

    etri

    c st

    rain

    , ε

    v

    Axial strain, εa

    0.063mm salt, 15%

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • -0.1

    -0.08

    -0.06

    -0.04

    -0.02

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Vo

    lum

    etri

    c st

    rain

    , ε

    v

    Axial strain, εa

    0.25mm salt, 15%

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • -0.1

    -0.08

    -0.06

    -0.04

    -0.02

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Vo

    lum

    etr

    ic s

    train

    , ε

    v

    Axial strain, εa

    0.5mm salt , 15%

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • -0.1

    -0.08

    -0.06

    -0.04

    -0.02

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Vo

    lum

    etri

    c st

    rain

    , ε

    v

    Axial strain, εa

    Volumetric behaviour related to particle size

    Post dissolution loose samples exhibit compressive behaviour to large strains followed by dilatancy

    1.0 mm salt , 15%

    0.5mm salt , 15%

    0.25mm salt, 15%

    0.063mm salt, 15%

    Sand reference tests

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • 0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    10 100 1000

    Vo

    id r

    atio

    , e

    Mean effective stress, p' (log scale)

    Errors in volume measurement at low pressures, or well documented difficulty in defining CSL at low stress?

    0.063 mm, 15%

    0.5 mm, 15% 0.25 mm, 15%

    Leighton Buzzard

    (Klotz &Coop, 2002)

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • Non-destructive testing method

    Small-strain stiffness determination, Gmax

    Gmax used to predict soil behaviour under dynamic

    loading

    (Dyvik & Madshus, 1985)

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • 6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • 6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion

  • Testing apparatus successfully modified and testing procedure developed to allow

    dissolution tests be performed.

    Post-dissolution strength and volumetric behaviour varies from dilative to contractive

    depending on particle size removed.

    Good convergence of strength data on stress ratio graph.

    Loose sand sample preparation technique?

    Larger particles removed result in compressive behaviour over larger axial strains.

    Approximately 40% decrease in shear wave velocity apparently independent of salt

    particle size removed in 15% by mass dissolved.

    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion