Educating for professional life Developing and Embedding Inclusive Policy and Practice in Higher...
-
Upload
joseph-roberts -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of Educating for professional life Developing and Embedding Inclusive Policy and Practice in Higher...
Developing and Embedding Inclusive Policy and Practice in
Higher Education
Presented by Dr Ann Rumpus and Eileen Laycock
10 September 2008
Background & Aim• Inclusive Curriculum for Disabled
Students (ICDS) is part of three-year TQEF funded programme at the University of Westminster
• Aim: to develop and embed university-wide approaches to inclusive curriculum design and delivery to support disabled students’ learning
Objectives• To support new and existing staff to continue to develop
inclusive curriculum design and inclusive learning and teaching practices that will reduce barriers to learning for disabled students and will recognise a diversity of learning styles.
• To involve staff and disabled students in identifying good practice and barriers in existing learning and teaching approaches.
• To review the University's processes for curriculum validation and review, in relation to inclusion for disabled students.
• To promote inclusive approaches for disabled students that are embedded in mainstream processes and practices.
KEY ACHIEVEMENTS• Focus Groups • Learning & Teaching Guides • Case Studies• Website • Course Validation and Review • PGCertHE • Seminar for Disability Tutors/ Learning &
Teaching Coordinators• Workshop at annual Learning & Teaching
Symposium
Focus Groups• 22 held for disabled students & staff
• Purpose to seek views of students/staff on good practice and barriers
• Information gained in FGs used to inform Learning & Teaching Guides and Case Studies
• 8 FG themes: Admissions; research students; personal tutoring; competence standards; learning & teaching resources; laboratories, practicals and workshops; lectures, seminars, tutorials; work placements/experience
Learning & Teaching Guides
• Introductory Guide• Recruitment and Selection (Get your free draft copy
today!)• Enrolment and induction (Get your free draft copy today!)• Assessment (Get your free draft copy today!) • Validation and review• Competence Standards and Curriculum Review• Information and Learning Resources• Lectures, Seminars and Tutorials• Labs, Workshops and Practical Work
Case Studies• 8 case studies planned – 4 from staff
and 4 from students
• Based on information gleaned from focus groups
• Plan to build in facility to add further case studies after project has ended
Other Activities• Course Validation and Review• PGCertHE • Seminars & Workshops• Teaching & Learning Symposium• Website http://www.wmin.ac.uk/page-14267
containing all project information
What Next?• Sustainability – how can the work be
“embedded” in the institution? • Structural changes occurring – where would
the work be best located? • Who should be responsible for ensuring this?• How will it be sustained within the CPD
framework? • How can guidance about responsibilities and
strategies best be communicated to staff?
Who was involved?• Daniela de Silva Dyslexia Adviser, University of Westminster• Caroline Davies Consultant, Impact Associates• Tina Elliott Consultant, Impact Associates• Monica Grinfeld Disability Tutor, University of Westminster• Hilary Gura Administrator, University of Westminster• Katherine Hewlett AchieveAbility, University of Westminster• Eileen Laycock Disability Services Manager, University of Westminster• Rikki Morgan-TamosumasPVC, Learning & Teaching, University of Westminster• Hayrunisa Pelge Disability Adviser, University of Westminster• Ann Rumpus Head of EIC, University of Westminster• Judith Webster Deputy Academic Registrar, University of Westminster• Will Whitlock Disability Tutor, University of Westminster
Thanks to all the above and …..University of Westminster students; learning and teaching coordinators and other staff who
attended focus groups
• HE Academy
Any questions?
Activity• If you were putting a team together in your
institution to develop the IC who would it be and why?
• How would the work be funded?• What would be the intended timescale?• What would you identify as the key stages
and outcomes?
• 15 mins individual discussion, then 15 mins feedback