Eduardo Martínez Montes Neurophysics Department Cuban Neuroscience Center Source Localization for...
-
Upload
jasmine-griffith -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Eduardo Martínez Montes Neurophysics Department Cuban Neuroscience Center Source Localization for...
Eduardo Martínez MontesEduardo Martínez Montes
Neurophysics Department Neurophysics Department Cuban Neuroscience CenterCuban Neuroscience Center
Source Localization for the EEG and MEG
EEG/MEG BETInverse ProblemInverse Problem
of the EEG/MEGof the EEG/MEG
Prior Information
or Constraints
Anatomical Mathematical
EEG generatorsEEG generators
EEG reflects the electrical activity of neuronal masses, with spatial and temporal synchrony.
Primary Current Density (PCD). Macroscopic temporal and spatial average of current density produced by Postsinaptic Potentials.
Main difficulties
. Geometry . Inhomogeneity . Anisotropy
Direct ProblemDirect ProblemEEG/MEGPCD
Model for the head
. Piece-wise isotropic
and homogeneous
Espherical Geometry
Realistic Geometry
POTENTIALMaxwell equations +Boundary conditions + 2nd Green Identity =Fredholm Eq. 2nd type
Drawbacks. Prior Model for DCP. Sensitivity to
conductivity ratios
Direct ProblemDirect ProblemLEAD FIELD
Reciprocity Theorem =
Fredholm Eq. 1st type
k -> lead field
Drawbacks
. Sensitivity to conductivity ratios
3( ) ( , ) ( )c
e e
R
V d r k r r j r r
Nunez, 1981; Riera and Fuentes, 1998
Inverse ProblemInverse Problem
of the EEG/MEGof the EEG/MEG
3, , ,s s g g gv r t K r r j r t d r
Continuum:
Drawback: The IP has analytical solution only for unrealistically simplehead geometries and prior assumptions.
3 3s t s g g t s tN N N N N N N N v = K j + eDiscrete:
Drawback: The problem is highly underdetermined (Ns<<Ng), with an ill-conditioned system matrix K that makes the solution very sensible to small measurement noise errors.
EEG/MEG PCD
3( ) ( , ) ( )c
e e
R
V d r k r r j r r
Different ApproachesDifferent Approaches
Dipolar - local minima, ad hoc number of dipoles, spread act.
BESA CURRY MUSIC
Distributed - non-uniq., ill-cond.,
point sources
Regularization
. Minimum Norm
. Weighted MN, FOCUSS, RWMN
. LORETA Bayesian Approach
. BMA Others
. LAURA, EPIFOCUS
. BeamformerChristoph et al., 2004
What’s wrong with IS methods?What’s wrong with IS methods?1- Ghost Sources:
2- Bias in the estimation of deep sources:
New methodologyNew methodology
Based on Bayesian ApproachAims to reduce the appearance of ghost sourcesAims to overcome the bias on the estimation of
the deep sources.
Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA)
Trujillo et al., 2004.
MN Methods: Tikhonov vs BayesMN Methods: Tikhonov vs Bayes
2 2ˆ min j
j v K j L j
TikhonovRegularization
P P P j v v j j
Bayes
Bayesian Model
v = K j+ e
ˆ max P j
j j v
2,N e 0 I 12,N Tj 0 L L
Why Bayes?Why Bayes?
Offers a natural way for introducing prior information in terms of probabilities
It is easy to construct very complicated models from much simpler ones
Bayesian Framework:Bayesian Framework:First LevelFirst Level
GivenGiven::
kM
v
Model +Data
ˆ max ,k kP Mj
j j v
,,
, ,
k kk
k
k k k
P M P MP M
P M
P M P M P M d
v j jj v
v
v v j j j
InferInfer::
ˆ ,k kE M j j v
Why Bayes Again?Why Bayes Again?
It accounts for uncertainty about model form by weighting the conditional posterior densities according to the posterior probabilities of each model.
Bayesian Framework:Bayesian Framework:Second LevelSecond Level
Averaging
Model
Model +Data
1M
NM
v
GivenGiven::
1
ˆ max
max ,N
k kk
P
P M P M
j
j
j j v
j v v
1
0
00
0
0 0
,
;
N
k kk
kk kk kN
r rr
k k
P P M P M
P MBP M
P MB
B P v M P v M
j v j v v
v
1
ˆ ,N
k kk
E E M P M
j j v j v v
Models and Dimensionality:Models and Dimensionality:
1M
2M
kM
1kM
NM
For 69 compartments2010N
3M 2kM
1
,N
k kk
E E M P M
j v j v v
Previous Studies about Visual Previous Studies about Visual Steady-State responses:Steady-State responses:
A strong source has been reported in the primary visual cortex located in the medial region of the occipital hemispheric pole.
A second frontal source has also been observed and has been associated with the electroretinogram.
Some authors have predicted the activation of the thalamus, but it has not been yet detected with none of the inverse methods available.
Conclusions:Conclusions: A new Bayesian inverse solution method based on
model averaging is proposed The new method shows less blurring and
significantly less ghost sources than previous approaches
The new approach shows that the EEG might contain enough information for estimating deep sources even in the presence of cortical ones.
Ongoing Research:Ongoing Research:
Extension of the methodology to include spatial-temporal constraints
Use connectivity constraints for solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem
Estimation of causal models using the anatomical connectivity as prior information
ReferencesReferences
N.J. Trujillo-Barreto, L. Melie-García, E. Cuspineda, E. Martínez, P.A. Valdés-Sosa. Bayesian Inference and Model Averaging in EEG/MEG Imaging [abstract]. Presented at the 9th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 19-22, 2003, New York, NY. Available on CD-Rom in NeuroImage, Vol. 19, No. 2.
N.J. Trujillo-Barreto, E. Palmero, L. Melie, E. Martinez. MCMC for Bayesian Model Averaging in EEG/MEG Imaging [abstract]. Presented at the 9th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 19-22, 2003, New York, NY. Available on CD-Rom in NeuroImage, Vol. 19, No. 2.
N.J. Trujillo-Barreto, E. Aubert-Vázquez, P.A. Valdés-Sosa, (2004). Bayesian Model Averaging in EEG/MEG imaging. NeuroImage, 21: 1300–1319.
Nunez P., (1981) Electrics Fields of the Brain. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Riera JJ, Fuentes ME (1998). Electric lead field for a piecewise homogeneous volume conductor model of the head. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45:746 –753.
Christoph M. Michel, Micah M. Murray, Göran Lantz, Sara Gonzalez, Laurent Spinelli, Rolando Grave de Peralta, (2004). EEG source imaging. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2195–2222.