Editorial Comment on: Current Applications for Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time

1
Editorial Comment on: Current Applications for Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Andrea Gallina Department of Urology, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy [email protected] Pierre I. Karakiewicz Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada [email protected], [email protected] Prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) holds great promise for the prediction of cancer characteristics, such as stage and probability of progression before the delivery of definitive ther- apy [1–4]. Similarly, PSADT appears to have the ability to predict the probability of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, especially after a previously negative biopsy. Moreover, PSADT was shown to predict progression towards lethal PCa phenotypes after radiation or surgery. Finally, PSADT repre- sents one of the most powerful predictors of PCa-specific mortality in men with androgen- insensitive prostate cancer (AIPC) [5]. PSADT calculators are available at several PCa-oriented Web sites, such as the MSKCC site (www.nomo- grams.org) or the University of Montreal site (www.nomogram.org). The PSADT calculators allow the clinician to define the PSADT value of the individual patient at a given time. This metric showed promise as an independent predictor of cancer outcomes at different stages of the natural history of treated prostate cancer. Unfortunately, the current reports which showcase the value of PSADT might at times be difficult to interpret and even more difficult to implement. The problem relates to different PSADT cut-offs that are sug- gested as ‘‘ideal’’ predictors of unfavorable out- come. As a result, the clinician might not be able to derive the full benefit of the information contained within this powerful marker. Svatek et al circum- vented the problem related to the interpretation of various PSADT cut-offs and integrated PSADT within a prognostic nomogram for men with AIPC [5]. Of all predictors, PSADT was the most infor- mative, and accomplished its prognostic role for prediction of PCa-specific mortality in noncategor- ized format. Svatek et al demonstrated that this powerful predictor can result in most accurate predictions and can yield the best calibration, when it was combined with three other informa- tive and significant variables [5]. Most importantly, these researchers proved that PSADT can be used to provide individualized predictions, which can be easily interpreted (prognosis expressed as a prob- ability from 0–100% of dying from PCa at different time points) and can be equally easily accessed by patients and/or physicians (www.nomogram.org). Hopefully, more researchers will reexamine their valuable findings and will attempt to integrate PSADT within prognostic models capable of pro- viding evidence-based, individualized prognostic information. Such measures would certainly result in much wider use of PSADT and would possibly improve patient care. References [1] Ramı ´rez ML, Nelson EC, deVere White RW, Lara Jr PN, Evans CP. Current applications for prostate-specific anti- gen doubling time. Eur Urol 2008;54:291–302. [2] Maffezzini M, Bossi A, Collette L. Implications of pros- tate-specific antigen doubling time as indicator of failure after surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2007;51:605–13. [3] Yossepowitch O, Bianco Jr FJ, Eggener SE, Eastham JA, Scher HI, Scardino PT. The natural history of nonca- strate metastatic prostate cancer after radical prosta- tectomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:940–8. [4] Studer UE, Collette L, Whelan P, et al. Using PSA to guide timing of androgen deprivation in patients with T0–4 N0–2 M0 prostate cancer not suitable for local curative treatment (EORTC 30891). Eur Urol 2008;53:941–9. [5] Svatek R, Karakiewicz PI, Shulman M, Karam J, Perrotte P, Benaim E. Pre-treatment nomogram for disease- specific survival of patients with chemotherapy-naive androgen independent prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2006; 49:666–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.006 DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.003 european urology 54 (2008) 291–302 302

Transcript of Editorial Comment on: Current Applications for Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time

Editorial Comment on: Current Applications forProstate-Specific Antigen Doubling TimeAndrea GallinaDepartment of Urology, Vita-Salute University,Milan, [email protected]

Pierre I. KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit,University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal,QC, [email protected],[email protected]

Prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT)holds great promise for the prediction of cancercharacteristics, such as stage and probability ofprogression before the delivery of definitive ther-apy [1–4]. Similarly, PSADT appears to have theability to predict the probability of prostate cancer(PCa) diagnosis, especially after a previouslynegative biopsy. Moreover, PSADT was shown topredict progression towards lethal PCa phenotypesafter radiation or surgery. Finally, PSADT repre-sents one of the most powerful predictors ofPCa-specific mortality in men with androgen-insensitive prostate cancer (AIPC) [5]. PSADTcalculators are available at several PCa-orientedWeb sites, such as the MSKCC site (www.nomo-grams.org) or the University of Montreal site(www.nomogram.org). The PSADT calculatorsallow the clinician to define the PSADT value ofthe individual patient at a given time. This metricshowed promise as an independent predictor ofcancer outcomes at different stages of the naturalhistory of treated prostate cancer. Unfortunately,the current reports which showcase the value ofPSADT might at times be difficult to interpret andeven more difficult to implement. The problemrelates to different PSADT cut-offs that are sug-gested as ‘‘ideal’’ predictors of unfavorable out-come. As a result, the clinician might not be able toderive the full benefit of the information containedwithin this powerful marker. Svatek et al circum-vented the problem related to the interpretation ofvarious PSADT cut-offs and integrated PSADTwithin a prognostic nomogram for men with AIPC

[5]. Of all predictors, PSADT was the most infor-mative, and accomplished its prognostic role forprediction of PCa-specific mortality in noncategor-ized format. Svatek et al demonstrated that thispowerful predictor can result in most accuratepredictions and can yield the best calibration,when it was combined with three other informa-tive and significant variables [5]. Most importantly,these researchers proved that PSADT can be usedto provide individualized predictions, which can beeasily interpreted (prognosis expressed as a prob-ability from 0–100% of dying from PCa at differenttime points) and can be equally easily accessed bypatients and/or physicians (www.nomogram.org).Hopefully, more researchers will reexamine theirvaluable findings and will attempt to integratePSADT within prognostic models capable of pro-viding evidence-based, individualized prognosticinformation. Such measures would certainly resultin much wider use of PSADT and would possiblyimprove patient care.

References

[1] Ramı́rez ML, Nelson EC, deVere White RW, Lara Jr PN,

Evans CP. Current applications for prostate-specific anti-

gen doubling time. Eur Urol 2008;54:291–302.

[2] Maffezzini M, Bossi A, Collette L. Implications of pros-

tate-specific antigen doubling time as indicator of failure

after surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Eur Urol 2007;51:605–13.

[3] Yossepowitch O, Bianco Jr FJ, Eggener SE, Eastham JA,

Scher HI, Scardino PT. The natural history of nonca-

strate metastatic prostate cancer after radical prosta-

tectomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:940–8.

[4] Studer UE, Collette L, Whelan P, et al. Using PSA to guide

timing of androgen deprivation in patients with T0–4

N0–2 M0 prostate cancer not suitable for local curative

treatment (EORTC 30891). Eur Urol 2008;53:941–9.

[5] Svatek R, Karakiewicz PI, Shulman M, Karam J, Perrotte P,

Benaim E. Pre-treatment nomogram for disease-

specific survival of patients with chemotherapy-naive

androgen independent prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2006;

49:666–74.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.006

DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.003

e u r o p e a n u r o l o g y 5 4 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 2 9 1 – 3 0 2302