Editorial

1
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (1999), 12, 000–000 # 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd. 01 Ahed Bhed Ched Dhed Ref marker Fig marker Table marker Ref end Ref start Editorial This supplement brings together two major themes that currently concern health care practi- tioners – obesity and the evaluation of practice. Once considered an aesthetic rather than a serious medical problem, obesity, defined as a body mass index of 30 kg/m 2 or greater, is now recognized as a major public health problem that generates significant health service costs (West 1994). Despite the setting of national targets and consideration of strategy options (Department of Health 1992; Department of Health 1995); the levels of obesity continue to rise. Helping patients to lose weight and maintain a new lower weight is a challenge that is made more difficult by the limited evidence for effective strategies. Clearly the aim of treatments, referred to as weight management services in this supplement, should be to prevent or reduce the medical consequences of obesity and ultimately morbidity. The achievement of ‘ideal weight’ is not necessary to achieve health benefits. A weight loss of 5–10% of the initial body weight will result in clinically useful changes such as lowered blood pressure, reduction in plasma total cholesterol and triglycer- ides, an increase in HDL cholesterol and an improvement in diabetic control (Royal College of Physicians 1998). Consequently the effectiveness of a treatment programme should no longer be judged by the achievement or otherwise of an ‘ideal weight’ but rather by modest weight loss resulting in measurable improvements to health and the maintenance of such weight loss for the long term. Many weight management services are being run by health care teams or individuals at local level but not all are evaluated for effectiveness and those that are, are rarely disseminated to help others plan effective programmes. In April 1997, the Department of Heath (DH) allocated £100 000 to encouraging good practice in the treatment of obesity. The funds were used to compile a directory of existing weight manage- ment services, and additionally to enable the evaluation of a small selection of the identified weight management services. However, the DH recognized that not all practitioners have the same level of experience in evaluation and each service may require a slightly different approach. As part of the project, expert advice was made available at the start and throughout the life of the evaluation. This is described in the paper by Rayner & Ziebland (p. 9) and is a good starting point for those needing to evaluate a weight management service. Ten project evaluations are described in this supplement and have been assessed to determine the most effective treatment components includ- ing factors associated with recruitment and initiating weight loss, successful weight loss and maintenance of weight loss. These are summarized in the paper by Hughes and Martin (p. 1). Whilst not comprehensive because of the limited number of services evaluated, this project will add to the knowledge of the effectiveness of treatments for obesity and hopefully encourage others to undertake systematic evaluation of their work. References Department of Health. (1992) Health of the Nation. A Strategy for Health in England. London, HMSO. Department of Health. (1995) OBESITY. Reversing the Increasing Problem of Obesity in England. A Report from the Nutrition and Physical Activity Task Forces. London, Department of Health. Royal College of Physicians. (1998) Clinical Management of overweight and obese patients. With Particular Reference to the Use of Drugs. London: Royal College of Physicians. West, R. (1994) Obesity. London: Office of Health Economics, pp. 38–41. Correspondence: Dr J. Hughes, Elmcroft, Crab Hill Lane, South Nutfield, Surrey RH1 5NR. Paper 13 Disc

Transcript of Editorial

Page 1: Editorial

Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (1999), 12, 000±000

# 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd. 01

Ahed

Bhed

Ched

Dhed

Ref marker

Fig marker

Table marker

Ref endRef start

Editorial

This supplement brings together two major

themes that currently concern health care practi-

tioners ± obesity and the evaluation of practice.

Once considered an aesthetic rather than a

serious medical problem, obesity, defined as a

body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or greater, is now

recognized as a major public health problem that

generates significant health service costs (West

1994). Despite the setting of national targets and

consideration of strategy options (Department of

Health 1992; Department of Health 1995); the

levels of obesity continue to rise. Helping patients

to lose weight and maintain a new lower weight

is a challenge that is made more difficult by the

limited evidence for effective strategies.

Clearly the aim of treatments, referred to as

weight management services in this supplement,

should be to prevent or reduce the medical

consequences of obesity and ultimately morbidity.

The achievement of `ideal weight' is not necessary

to achieve health benefits. A weight loss of 5±10%

of the initial body weight will result in clinically

useful changes such as lowered blood pressure,

reduction in plasma total cholesterol and triglycer-

ides, an increase in HDL cholesterol and an

improvement in diabetic control (Royal College of

Physicians 1998). Consequently the effectiveness of

a treatment programme should no longer be judged

by the achievement or otherwise of an `ideal

weight' but rather by modest weight loss resulting

in measurable improvements to health and the

maintenance of such weight loss for the long term.

Many weight management services are being

run by health care teams or individuals at local

level but not all are evaluated for effectiveness

and those that are, are rarely disseminated to

help others plan effective programmes. In April

1997, the Department of Heath (DH) allocated

£100 000 to encouraging good practice in the

treatment of obesity. The funds were used to

compile a directory of existing weight manage-

ment services, and additionally to enable the

evaluation of a small selection of the identified

weight management services.

However, the DH recognized that not all

practitioners have the same level of experience

in evaluation and each service may require a

slightly different approach. As part of the project,

expert advice was made available at the start and

throughout the life of the evaluation. This is

described in the paper by Rayner & Ziebland

(p. 9) and is a good starting point for those

needing to evaluate a weight management service.

Ten project evaluations are described in this

supplement and have been assessed to determine

the most effective treatment components includ-

ing factors associated with recruitment and

initiating weight loss, successful weight loss

and maintenance of weight loss. These are

summarized in the paper by Hughes and Martin

(p. 1). Whilst not comprehensive because of the

limited number of services evaluated, this project

will add to the knowledge of the effectiveness of

treatments for obesity and hopefully encourage

others to undertake systematic evaluation of

their work.

References

Department of Health. (1992) Health of the Nation. A

Strategy for Health in England. London, HMSO.

Department of Health. (1995) OBESITY. Reversing

the Increasing Problem of Obesity in England. A

Report from the Nutrition and Physical Activity

Task Forces. London, Department of Health.

Royal College of Physicians. (1998) Clinical

Management of overweight and obese patients.

With Particular Reference to the Use of Drugs.

London: Royal College of Physicians.

West, R. (1994) Obesity. London: Office of Health

Economics, pp. 38±41.

Correspondence: Dr J. Hughes, Elmcroft, Crab Hill

Lane, South Nutfield, Surrey RH1 5NR.

Paper 13 Disc