Editorial
Transcript of Editorial
![Page 1: Editorial](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080103/575023f91a28ab877eac9656/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (1999), 12, 000±000
# 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd. 01
Ahed
Bhed
Ched
Dhed
Ref marker
Fig marker
Table marker
Ref endRef start
Editorial
This supplement brings together two major
themes that currently concern health care practi-
tioners ± obesity and the evaluation of practice.
Once considered an aesthetic rather than a
serious medical problem, obesity, defined as a
body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or greater, is now
recognized as a major public health problem that
generates significant health service costs (West
1994). Despite the setting of national targets and
consideration of strategy options (Department of
Health 1992; Department of Health 1995); the
levels of obesity continue to rise. Helping patients
to lose weight and maintain a new lower weight
is a challenge that is made more difficult by the
limited evidence for effective strategies.
Clearly the aim of treatments, referred to as
weight management services in this supplement,
should be to prevent or reduce the medical
consequences of obesity and ultimately morbidity.
The achievement of `ideal weight' is not necessary
to achieve health benefits. A weight loss of 5±10%
of the initial body weight will result in clinically
useful changes such as lowered blood pressure,
reduction in plasma total cholesterol and triglycer-
ides, an increase in HDL cholesterol and an
improvement in diabetic control (Royal College of
Physicians 1998). Consequently the effectiveness of
a treatment programme should no longer be judged
by the achievement or otherwise of an `ideal
weight' but rather by modest weight loss resulting
in measurable improvements to health and the
maintenance of such weight loss for the long term.
Many weight management services are being
run by health care teams or individuals at local
level but not all are evaluated for effectiveness
and those that are, are rarely disseminated to
help others plan effective programmes. In April
1997, the Department of Heath (DH) allocated
£100 000 to encouraging good practice in the
treatment of obesity. The funds were used to
compile a directory of existing weight manage-
ment services, and additionally to enable the
evaluation of a small selection of the identified
weight management services.
However, the DH recognized that not all
practitioners have the same level of experience
in evaluation and each service may require a
slightly different approach. As part of the project,
expert advice was made available at the start and
throughout the life of the evaluation. This is
described in the paper by Rayner & Ziebland
(p. 9) and is a good starting point for those
needing to evaluate a weight management service.
Ten project evaluations are described in this
supplement and have been assessed to determine
the most effective treatment components includ-
ing factors associated with recruitment and
initiating weight loss, successful weight loss
and maintenance of weight loss. These are
summarized in the paper by Hughes and Martin
(p. 1). Whilst not comprehensive because of the
limited number of services evaluated, this project
will add to the knowledge of the effectiveness of
treatments for obesity and hopefully encourage
others to undertake systematic evaluation of
their work.
References
Department of Health. (1992) Health of the Nation. A
Strategy for Health in England. London, HMSO.
Department of Health. (1995) OBESITY. Reversing
the Increasing Problem of Obesity in England. A
Report from the Nutrition and Physical Activity
Task Forces. London, Department of Health.
Royal College of Physicians. (1998) Clinical
Management of overweight and obese patients.
With Particular Reference to the Use of Drugs.
London: Royal College of Physicians.
West, R. (1994) Obesity. London: Office of Health
Economics, pp. 38±41.
Correspondence: Dr J. Hughes, Elmcroft, Crab Hill
Lane, South Nutfield, Surrey RH1 5NR.
Paper 13 Disc