Economics Perspective

35
on Health Care and Women in the US [email protected] • www.pnhp.org Economics Perspective

description

Economics Perspective. on Health Care and Women in the US. [email protected] www.pnhp.org. Private market. for health services and health insurance. with an overlay of government spending. Who Pays for Healthcare?. Amount in 1998 (billions). Percent. Government. $736.8. 64.1%. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Economics Perspective

Page 1: Economics Perspective

on Health Care and Women in the US

[email protected]

• www.pnhp.org

Economics Perspective

Page 2: Economics Perspective

for health services and health insurance

with an overlay of government spending

Private market

Page 3: Economics Perspective

Who Pays for Healthcare?

Source: Himmelstein & Woolhandler - Unpublished analysis of NCHS data, Health Affairs 1999;18(2):176* Includes VA, NIH, subsidy for public hospitals, worker's comp, health departments etc.

Amount in 1998(billions) Percent

Government $736.8 64.1%

Medicare $216.2

Medicaid $170.6

Premiums for public employees $67.3

Tax subsidy for private insurance $124.8

Other* $157.9

Private employers $216.5 18.8%

Individuals (excludes tax subsidy) $195.8 17.0%

Total $1149.1 100%

Page 4: Economics Perspective

U.S. Public Spending Per Capita for Healthis Greater than Total Spending in Other Nations

Note: Public includes benefit costs for govt. employees & tax subsidy for private insuranceSource: NEJM 1999; 340:109; Health Aff 2000; 19(3):150

Page 5: Economics Perspective

Out-of-pocket payments, US and world

Page 6: Economics Perspective

Why Women Delay Prenatal CareWhen They Know They Are Pregnant

Source: MMWR 5/12/2000; 49:393

Note: 11.1% of pregnant women failed to get timely prenatal care despite knowing they werepregnant

47%

22%

31%

No money or insurance Unable to get appointment

Other reason

Page 7: Economics Perspective

Infant Mortality international

Page 8: Economics Perspective

Infant Deaths by Income, Canada 1996Even the Poor Do Better than U.S.

Average

3.94.7 5.1 5.2

6.5

7.8

012

3456

789

Wealthiest20%

Middle20%

Poorest20%

U.S.Average

Infa

nt

Mor

tali

ty

Page 9: Economics Perspective

Maternal mortality

Page 10: Economics Perspective

Life Expectancy For Women, 1997

Source: OECD, 1999 & NCHS

»81.8

»80.3

»82.3

»79.5

»81.3 »81.4

»79.4

»77

»78

»79

»80

»81

»82

»83

»U.S.

»U.K.

»GERM

ANY

»ITALY

»CANADA»SW

EDEN

»FRANCE

» YE

AR

S

Page 11: Economics Perspective

Poverty Rates, 1997U.S. and Other Industrialized Nations

Source: Luxembourg Income Study Working PapersNote: U.S. figure for 1997, other nations most recent available year

Page 12: Economics Perspective

Americans Lead the World in Hours Worked

Source: International Labor Organization, 1999

Page 13: Economics Perspective

Medical redlining

Page 14: Economics Perspective

Illness and Medical Costs,A Major Cause of Bankruptcy

• 45.6% of all bankruptcies involve a medical reason or large medical debt

• 326,441 families identified illness/injury as the main reason for bankruptcy in 1999

• An additional 269,757 had large medical debts at time of bankruptcy

• 7 per 1000 single women, and 5 per 1000 men suffered medical-related bankruptcy in 1999

Source: Norton's Bankruptcy Advisor, May, 2000

Page 15: Economics Perspective

Uninsured women with breast cancer, compared with the

insured:

• Have a 49% higher adjusted risk of death

• Are 1.4 xmore likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer at a late stage

Page 16: Economics Perspective

Uninsured women, compared with the insured, are:

• half as likely to have had both a mammogram and clinical breast examination in the previous 2 years

Page 17: Economics Perspective

Uninsured women aged 50-64, compared with the insured,

are:

2.1 xless likely to have had a recent mammogram

1.9 xless likely to have had a recent Pap test

2.1 xless likely to have had a recent clinical breast examination

Page 18: Economics Perspective

Uninsured women aged 40-49, compared with the insured,

are:

1.5 xless likely to have had a recent mammogram

1.9 xless likely to have had a recent Pap test

1.9 xless likely to have had a recent clinical breast examination

Page 19: Economics Perspective

Uninsured pregnant women, compared with the insured:

• Have a 31% higher likelihood of an adverse hospital outcome

Page 20: Economics Perspective

Federal Tax Subsidies forPrivate Health Spending, 1998

Note: Total federal tax subsidy = $111.2 billionSource: Health Affairs 1999; 18(2):176

$71$296

$535$847

$1195

$1684$1971

$2357

$0

$500

$1000

$1500

$2000

$2500

$3000

Family Income

Tax S

ubsidy Per F

amily

By Incom

e

Page 21: Economics Perspective

Regressive US financing

Source: Oxford Rev Econ Pol 1989;5(1):89

3

1.75

1.311.271.231.151.11.070.99

0.64

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

POORESTRICHEST INCOME DECILE

Share of Health P

ayments/Share of Incom

eWho Pays For Health Care?

Regressive U.S. Health Financing

Page 22: Economics Perspective

Source: Premier's Common Future Of Health, Excludes Out-of-Pocket Costs

0.740.770.851

1.21.31.3

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

15,00025,00035,00050,00075,000100 K125 K

FAMILY INCOME

Share of Health P

ayments/Share of

Income

(Province Of Alberta)

Progressive financing in Canada

Page 23: Economics Perspective

Administrative Cost

Page 24: Economics Perspective

Number of Insurance Products

Page 25: Economics Perspective

Private insurers’ High Overhead

Page 26: Economics Perspective
Page 27: Economics Perspective
Page 28: Economics Perspective
Page 29: Economics Perspective
Page 30: Economics Perspective

Milliman & RobertsonPediatric Length of Stay

Guidelines• 1 Day for Diabetic Coma• 2 Days for Osteomyelitis• 3 Days for Bacterial Meningitis

“They're outrageous. They’re dangerous. Kids could die because of these guidelines.”

Thomas Cleary, M.D. Prof. of Pediatrics, U. Texas, HoustonListed as "Contributing Author" in M&R manual

Source: Modern Healthcare May 8, 2000:34

Page 31: Economics Perspective

Milliman & Robertson

“We do not base our guidelines on any randomized clinical trials or other controlled studies, nor do we study outcomes before sharing the evidence of most efficient practices with colleagues.”

Wall Street Journal 7/1/98

Page 32: Economics Perspective

Fraud

Page 33: Economics Perspective

Can We Do Better? Yes!

• Every other industrialized nation has a health care system that assures medical care for all

• All spend less than we do; most spend less than half

• Most have lower death rates, more accountability, and higher satisfaction

• Stories of shortages? If they had our system, their problems would be much worse.

Page 34: Economics Perspective

We Have What it Takes

• Excellent hospitals, empty beds

• Enough well-trained professionals

• Superb research

• Current spending is sufficient

Page 35: Economics Perspective

What We Need:

• To lead our leaders