ECE 5233 Satellite Communications Prepared by: Dr. Ivica Kostanic Lecture 8: Satellite link design...
-
Upload
audrey-davidson -
Category
Documents
-
view
334 -
download
17
Transcript of ECE 5233 Satellite Communications Prepared by: Dr. Ivica Kostanic Lecture 8: Satellite link design...
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications
Prepared by:
Dr. Ivica Kostanic
Lecture 8: Satellite link design
(Section 4.1, 4.2)
Spring 2014
Florida Institute of technologies
Page 2
Objectives of link design
Elements of satellite link
Free space path loss equation
Signal to noise ratio and link capacity
Examples
Outline
Important note: Slides present summary of the results. Detailed derivations are given in notes.
Florida Institute of technologies
Objective of a link analysis
Link analysis determines properties of satellite equipment (antennas, amplifiers, data rate, etc.)
Two links need to be planned
o Uplink – from ground to satellite
o Downlink – from satellite to ground
Two way communication – 4 links (two way maritime communications)
One way communication – 2 links (example – TV broadcast)
Two links are not at the same frequency
Two links may or may not be in the same band
o Fixed / broadcast satellite services – usually same band
o Mobile satellite services may use different bands
In some systems satellite links may be combined with terrestrial returns
Page 3
One way communication
Two way communication
Florida Institute of technologies
Elements of a satellite link
Transmit power
TX antenna gain
Path losses
o Free space
o TX/RX antenna losses
o Environmental losses
RX antenna gain
RX properties
o Noise temperature
o Sensitivity (S/N and ROC)
Design margins required to guarantee certain reliability
Page 4
Note: satellite signals are usually very weak – requires careful link budget planning
Florida Institute of technologies
Free space path loss – transmit side
Free Space Path Losses (FSPL) due to dispersion of EM wave energy
Antenna used to focus the energy of the wave in the direction of the receiver
Note: antenna gain is usually quoted in the direction of radiation maximum. For other direction need to use the actual radiation pattern
Page 5
24 R
GPW TT
Power flux in the direction of maximum radiation
Florida Institute of technologies
Free space path loss – receive side
Effective antenna gain (effective aperture)
Page 6
AA Ae hA – aperture efficiency of the antenna (50-90%)
Received power
eTT
eR AR
GPAWP
24
Using
Re GA 4
2
2/4 R
GGPP RTT
R
One obtains
FSPL equation
2/4 RFSPL
Florida Institute of technologies
Free Space Path Loss (FSPL)
Page 7
Equation for FSPL (linear)
2/4 RFSPL
R = distance between TX and RX
l = wavelength of the RF wave
Equation for FSPL (logarithmic) – Friis’ equations
GHzlog20mileslog205.96 fdFSPL
GHzlog20kmlog2044.92 fdFSPL
Notes:
FSPL grow 20dB/dec as a function of distance
FSPL grows 20dB/dec as a function of frequency
FSPL curves are straight lines in log-log coordinate system
For Geo-Stationary satellites – loss may be above 200dB!
FSPL curves 1-32GHz range
Florida Institute of technologies
Additional losses
Additional losses
o Misalignment of the antennas
o Atmospheric losses
o Radome losses
o Component mismatch losses
The additional losses are taken into account through appropriate design margins
Typical design margin 5-10dB
o Component accuracy
o Operating frequency
o Required reliability
Page 8
ALFSPLEiRP RR GP
Link equation
AL – additional losses
Florida Institute of technologies
Shannon capacity formula
Shannon capacity formula – establishes fundamental limits on communication
In the case of AWGN satellite channel
Page 9
N
SBC 1log2
C – capacity of the channel in bits/sec
B – bandwidth of the channel in Hz
S/N – signal to noise ratio (linear)
Define g = R/B - bandwidth utilization in bps/Hz, where R is the information rate in bps.
02
02
1log
1log
N
E
BN
RE
B
C
b
b
Minimum energy per bit normalized to noise power density that is required for a given spectrum utilization
12min
00
N
E
N
E bb
Note: g is the fundamental measure of spectrum utilization. Ultimate goal of every wireless communication system is to provide largest g for a given set of constraints.
Florida Institute of technologies
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
EbNo ~ Power (linear ratio)
Spe
ctra
l eff
icie
ncy
[bps
/Hz]
Bandwidth limited
Power limited
Bandwidth utilization vs. power trade-off
Bandwidth utilization increases with an increase of available power
In power limited regions small increase of power produce significant increase in bandwidth utilization
In bandwidth limited region large power increase is required for increase in bandwidth utilization
For systems that are in bandwidth limited region – capacity is increased through frequency reuse
By combining power and reuse methods, contemporary systems reach spectrum utilization of 3-7bps/Hz
Page 10
Note: most of contemporary satellite systems are bandwidth limited – lot of efforts invested in means for spectrum reuse
12min
00
N
E
N
E bb
Florida Institute of technologies
Examples
Example 4.2.1. A satellite at a distance of 40000km from a point on Earth surface radiates power of 10W into antenna gain of 17dB. Find the flux density on the Earth surface and the power received using antenna with effective aperture of 10 square meters.
Answers:
Flux density: 2.49e-14 W/m2
Received power: -126dBW (-96dBm)
Example 4.2.2. The satellite in Example 4.2.1 operates at a frequency of 11GHz (Ku band). The gain of the receiving antenna is 52.3dB. Find the received power.
Answer:
Received power: -126dBW
Page 11