ECCL Neg Dec Technical Appendices

7/28/2019 ECCL Neg Dec Technical Appendices

1/369

P U B L I C R E V I E W D R A F T

E M E RY V I L L E C E N T E R OF C OM M U N I T Y

I N I T I A L S T U D Y / MI T I G A T E D N E G A T ID E C L A R A T I O N

T E C H N IC A L A P P E N D I CE S


2/369


3/369

Submitted to:

Emery Unified School District

1275 61st Street

Emeryville, CA 94608

Prepared by:

LSA Associates, Inc.

2215 Fifth Street

Berkeley, CA 94710

510.540.7331

E M E RY V I L L E C E N T E R OF C OM M U N I T Y

I N I T I A L S T U D Y / MI T I G A T E D N E G A T ID E C L A R A T I O N

T E C H N IC A L A P P E N D I CE S

P U B L I C R E V I E W D R A F T


4/369


5/369

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A: Illumination Summary (Lighting Scenario A)

APPENDIX B: Air Quality Modeling Data

APPENDIX C: Cultural Resources Study andHistorical Evaluation

APPENDIX D: Noise Modeling Data

APPENDIX E: Transportation Impact Analysis

EMERYVILLE CENTER OF COMMUNITY LIFE

INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION

TECHNICAL APPENDICES


6/369


7/369

APPENDIX A

ILLUMINATION SUMMARY

(LIGHTING SCENARIO A)


8/369


9/369

EQ

UIPMENTLAYOUT

No

ttoberepro

duce

dinw

ho

leorp

artw

ithou

tthewri

ttenconsen

to

fMusco

Sports

Lighting,

LLC

.1981

,2013

Musco

Sports

Lighting,

LLC

.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

EricS

venby

File#/Date:

153689R6

03-Jun-13

Fo o

tb a l l

36

0'

x1

60

'

10

10

20

20

3

0

30

40

40

50

50

40

40

30

30

2020

10

10

C2

C1

A2

B2

B1

A1

S o c c e r

325

'x

18

5'

Baseball

Irregular

SCALEIN

FEET1:

80

0'

80'

160'

Polelocation(s)

dimensionsarerelative

to0,0referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:

EmeryvilleSportsComplex

Location:

Emer

yville,CA

EQUIPMENTLAYOUT

INCLUDES:

Baseball

Football

Soccer

ElectricalSystemRequireme

nts:RefertoAmperage

DrawChartand/orthe"Mus

coControlSystemSummary"

forelectricalsizing.

InstallationRequirements:R

esultsassume+/-3%

nominalvoltageatlinesideo

ftheballastandstructures

locatedwithin3feet(1m)of

designlocations.

EQUIPMENTLISTFOR

AREASSHOWN

Pole

Luminaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRAD

E

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY

/

POLE

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

TO

TALS

36

SINGLELUMINAIREAMPE

RAGEDRAWC

HART

BallastSpecifications

(.90minpowerfactor)

LineAmperagePerLuminaire

(maxdraw)

SinglePhaseVoltage

20

8(6

0)

220

(60)

240

(60)

277

(60)

347

(60)

380

(60)

480

(60)

1500wattMZ

8

.6

8.3

7.5

6.5

5.1

4.7

3.7


10/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMARY

Nottobereproducedinwholeorp

artwithoutthewrittenconsentofMusco

SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,

2013

MuscoSportsLighting,

LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

EricS

venby

File#/Date:

153689R9

06-Jun-13

20

24

24

20

24

26

35

39

35

30

34

31

38

37

36

32

34

27

36

35

33

32

29

25

34

32

27

24

24

23

35

30

23

20

21

21

35

28

23

21

23

24

35

33

30

27

27

26

41

39

36

32

31

30

39

42

40

35

33

33

39

41

38

36

35

33

33

29

24

29

33

23

10

10

20

20

30

3

0

40

40

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

169'

43'

91'

190'

125'

175

'

121'

162'

125'

130'

190'

6

9'

A2

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

SCALEIN

FEET1:80

0'

80'

160'

EQUIPMENTLIST

FORAREASSHOWN

Pole

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

5

TOTALS

30

30

0

Polelocation(s)


to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:


Location:Emeryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Football

Size:

360'x160'

Spacing:

30.0'

x30.0

'

Height:

3.0'a

bovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINA

TION

SUMMARY

HORIZONTALFOOTCANDLES

Entir

eGrid

GuaranteedAverage:

30

ScanAverage:

30.6

Maximum:

42

Minimum:

20

Avg/Min:

1.5

4

GuaranteedMax/Min:

2.5

Max/Min:

2.1

0

UG(adjacentpts):

1.7

5

CV:

0.2

0

No.

ofPoints:

72

LUMINAIREINFORMATION

LuminaireType:

GreenGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,000

hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,0

00

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.000

No.

ofLuminaires:

30

AvgKW:

46.92

(51.0

max)

GuaranteedPerformance:TheGuaranteedAverage

CONSTANTILLUMINATIONdescribedaboveisguaranteed

fortheratedlifeofthelamp.

FieldMeasurements:Illuminationmeasuredinaccordancewith

IESNALM-5-04andCIBSELG4.

Individualvaluesmayvary.

SeetheWarrantydocumentfordetails.

ElectricalSystemRequiremen

ts:RefertoAmperage

DrawChartand/orthe"MuscoControlSystemSummary"


InstallationRequirements:Re

sultsassume+/-3%

nominalvoltageatlinesideof

theballastandstructures

locatedwithin3feet(1m)ofd

esignlocations.


11/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMARY

Nottobereproducedinwholeorp

artwithoutthewrittenconsentofMusco

SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,

2013

MuscoSportsLighting,

LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

EricSvenby

File#/Date:

1536

89R9

06-Jun-13

10

10

20

20

30

3

0

40

40

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

24

32

33

27

27

32

26

34

38

39

34

32

35

23

35

38

36

33

33

29

22

3

4

3

5

3

230

27

26

21

34

33

28

23

21

22

18

39

32

24

20

20

23

20

38

33

28

25

25

25

22

38

37

35

31

29

28

25

3940

40

36

3

3

3

2

3

1

36

41

42

37

34

33

33

37

37

35

35

36

33

24

169'

43'

91'

189'

125'

175

'

121'

162'

125'

130'

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

SCALEIN

FEET1:80

0'

80'

160'

EQUIPMENTLIST

FORAREASSHOWN

Pole

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

5

TOTALS

30

30

0

Polelocation(s)


to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:


Location:Emeryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Soccer

Size:

325'x185'

Spacing:

30.0'x30.0

'

Height:

3.0'a

bovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINA

TION

SUMMARY


Entir

eGrid

GuaranteedAverage:

30

ScanAverage:

3

1.0

Maximum:

42

Minimum:

18

Avg/Min:

1

.70

GuaranteedMax/Min:

2.5

Max/Min:

2

.28

UG(adjacentpts):

1

.49

CV:

0

.19

No.

ofPoints:

77


LuminaireType:

Gree

nGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,000

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

30

AvgKW:

46.92(51.0

max)

GuaranteedPerformance:Th

eGuaranteedAverage








ts:RefertoAmperage




sultsassume+/-3%

nominalvoltageatlinesideof

theballastandstructures


esignlocations.


12/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMARY

NottobereproducedinwholeorpartwithoutthewrittenconsentofMusco

SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,

2013MuscoSportsLighting,

LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

EricSvenby

File#/Date:

1536

89R9

06-Jun-13

10

10

20

20

30

3

0

40

40

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

56

57

44

42

37

28

20

19

60

64

57

53

48

38

31

30

28

54

61

59

54

46

38

34

36

26

46

57

55

4

9

42

37

33

28

22

42

51

48

41

33

28

27

2

5

19

43

45

38

30

24

22

23

21

38

38

34

28

24

23

24

18

38

41

38

33

28

27

25

37

41

4

1

36

32

30

42

71'

137'

245'

10'

66'

276'

35'

45'

186'

306'

58'

24'

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

A

2

SCALEIN

FEET1:80

0'

80'

160'

EQUIPMENTLISTFORAREASSHOWN

Pole

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500WM

Z

6

6

0

6

TOTALS

36

36

0

Polelocation(s)

dimensionsarere

lative

to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:


Location:Emeryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Base

ball

Size:

Irregular260'/268'/260'

Spacing:

30.0'x30.0

'

Height:

3.0'

abovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINA

TION

SUMMARY


Infield

Outfield

GuaranteedAverage:

50

30

ScanAverage:

5

0.2

30.5

Maximum:

64

45

Minimum:

33

18

Avg/Min:

1

.54

1.6

9

GuaranteedMax/Min:

2

2.5

Max/Min:

1

.96

2.4

7

UG(adjacentpts):

1

.29

1.6

1

CV:

0

.16

0.2

4

No.

ofPoints:

25

48


LuminaireType:

Gree

nGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,000

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

36

AvgKW:

56.3

(61.2

max)


eGuaranteedAverage








ts:RefertoAmperage




sultsassume+/-3%

nominalvoltageatlinesideoftheballastandstructures


esignlocations.


13/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMARY


SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,


LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

EricSvenby

File#/Date:

1536

89R9

06-Jun-13

10

10

20

20

30

30

40

40

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

A2

18

.01

22

.87

29

.97

32

.13

26

.62

28

.87

32

.68

30

.15

24

.80

25

.75

32.

87

39.

51

36

.32

25

.92

14

.01

6.

73

7.4

3

9.1

5

10

.21

10

.95

12

.51

13

.38

11

.241

7.6

119

.1118

.9018

.4314

.4413

.6618

.8019

.7724.7830

.0222

.23

14

.32 1

0.6

0

12

.33

14

.07

18

.01

18

.25

SCALEIN

FEET1:80

0'

80'

160'


Pole

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

6

TOTALS

36

36

0

Polelocation(s)

dimensionsarere

lative

to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:


Location:Emeryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Track

Spacing:

30.0'

Height:

3.0'

abovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINA

TION

SUMMARY


EntireGrid

ScanAverage:

20

.185

Maximum:

39.5

1

Minimum:

6

.73

No.

ofPoints:

40


LuminaireType:

Gree

nGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,000

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

36

AvgKW:

56.3

(61.2

max)


eCONSTANTILLUMINATION

describedaboveisguaranteedfortheratedlife

ofthelamp.


IESNALM-5-04andCIBSELG4

.Individualvaluesmayvary.



ts:RefertoAmperage

DrawChartand/orthe"Musc

oControlSystemSummary"



sultsassume+/-3%



esignlocations.


14/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMARY


SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,


LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

EricSvenby

File#/Date:

1536

89R9

06-Jun-13

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

10

10

20

20

30

30

40

40

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

A2

SCALEIN

FEET1:150

0'

150'

300'


Pole

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

6

TOTALS

36

36

0

Polelocation(s)

dimensionsarere

lative

to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:

Eme

ryvilleSportsComplex

Location:Emeryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Spill

@W

estPL

Spacing:

30.0'

Height:

3.0'

abovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINA

TION

SUMMARY


EntireGrid

ScanAverage:

0.000

Maximum:

0

.00

Minimum:

0

.00

No.

ofPoints:

18


LuminaireType:

Gree

nGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,000

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

36

AvgKW:

56.3

(61.2

max)




ofthelamp.




SeetheWarrantydocumentf

ordetails.

ElectricalSystemRequirements:RefertoAmperage





sultsassume+/-3%


locatedwithin3feet(1m)ofdesignlocations.

Y


15/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMARY


SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,

201


LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

EricSvenby

File#/Date:

1536

89R9

06-Jun-13

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

0.

00

10

10

20

20

30

30

40

40

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

A2

SCALEIN

FEET1:150

0'

150'

300'


Pole

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

6

TOTALS

36

36

0

Polelocation(s)

dimensionsarere

lative

to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:

Eme


Location:Eme

ryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Spill

@W

estPL

Spacing:

30.0'

Height:

3.0'

abovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINA

TION

SUMMARY

MAXVERTICALFOOTCANDLES

EntireGrid

ScanAverage:

0

.000

Maximum:

0

.00

Minimum:

0

.00

No.

ofPoints:

18


LuminaireType:

Gree

nGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,000

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

36

AvgKW:

56.3

(61.2

max)




ofthelamp.

FieldMeasurements:Illumin

ationmeasuredinaccordancewith









sultsassume+/-3%



Y


16/369

ILLUMI

NATIONSUMMARY

Nottobereproducedinwholeor

partwithoutthewrittenconsentofMusco

SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,

201


LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

Eric

Svenby

File#/Date:

153689R9

06-Jun-13

0.

00

0.0

7

0.2

3

0.8

0

0.

83

0.5

4

0.2

9

0.1

7

0.0

7

0.0

3

0.0

2

0.0

1

0.0

1

0.0

1

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

10

10

20

20

30

30

40

4

0

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

A2

SCALEIN

FEET1:150

0'

150'

300'


Pole

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500WMZ

6

6

0

6

TOTALS

36

36

0

Polelocation(s)

dimensionsarere

lative

to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:

Eme


Location:Eme

ryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Spill@4

5'WestofPL

Spacing:

30.0

'

Height:

3.0'

abovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINA

TION

SUMMARY


EntireGrid

ScanAverage:

0

.172

Maximum:

0

.83

Minimum:

0

.00

No.

ofPoints:

18


LuminaireType:

Gree

nGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,0

00

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

36

AvgKW:

56.3

(61.2

max)




ofthelamp.










InstallationRequirements:Resultsassume+/-3%



Y3S


17/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMARY



SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,

201


LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

Eric

Svenby

File#/Date:

153689R9

06-Jun-13

0.

00

0.1

0

0.3

1

1.1

6

1.

39

1.0

5

0.6

7

0.4

3

0.2

1

0.1

0

0.0

7

0.0

5

0.0

4

0.0

3

0.0

2

0.0

2

0.0

2

0.0

1

10

10

20

20

30

30

40

4

0

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

A2

SCALEIN

FEET1:150

0'

150'

300'


Pole

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

6

TOTALS

36

36

0

Polelocation(s)


to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:

Eme


Location:Eme

ryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Spill@4

5'WestofPL

Spacing:

30.0

'

Height:

3.0'

abovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINA

TION

SUMMARY

MAXVERTICALFOOTCANDLES

EntireGrid

ScanAverage:

0

.316

Maximum:

1.3

9

Minimum:

0.0

0

No.

ofPoints:

18


LuminaireType:

GreenGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,0

00

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

36

AvgKW:

56.3

(61.2

max)

GuaranteedPerformance:TheCONSTANTILLUMINATION

describedaboveisguarantee

dfortheratedlife

ofthelamp.













RY3S


18/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMAR



SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,

201


LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

Eric

Svenby

File#/Date:

153689R9

06-Jun-13

10

10

20

20

30

30

40

4

0

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

A2

0.6

3

1.6

1

6.2

5

8.

94

7.6

2

7.1

1

6.6

6

5.8

2

4.2

2

3.6

8

2.9

3

1.8

5

0.7

8

0.2

3

0.0

9

0.0

5

0.0

3

0.

02

SCALEIN

FEET1:150

0'

150'

300'


Pole

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

6

TOTALS

36

36

0

Polelocation(s)


to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:

Eme


Location:Eme

ryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Spill@4

'EastofPL

Spacing:

30.0

'

Height:

3.0'

abovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINA

TION

SUMMARY


EntireGrid

ScanAverage:

3

.251

Maximum:

8.9

4

Minimum:

0.0

2

No.

ofPoints:

18


LuminaireType:

GreenGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,0

00

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

36

AvgKW:

56.3

(61.2

max)



dfortheratedlife

ofthelamp.













RY

o13E

S


19/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMAR



SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,

201


LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

Eric

Svenby

File#/Date:

153689R9

06-Jun-1

10

10

20

20

30

30

4

0

4

0

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

A2

0.9

7

1.7

9

6.3

1

9.

66

8.3

7

7.2

0

8.7

7

8.8

2

7.4

1

6.5

3

4.8

2

3.0

3

1.4

1

0.5

2

0.2

6

0.1

7

0.1

2

0.

09

SCALEIN

FEET1:150

0'

150'

300'

EQUIPMENTLIS

TFORAREASSHOWN

Pole

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

6

TOTALS

36

36

0

Polelocation(s)


to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:

Eme


Location:Eme

ryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Spill@4

'EastofPL

Spacing:

30.0

'

Height:

3.0'

abovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINA

TION

SUMMARY

MAXVERTICALFOOTCANDLE

EntireGrid

ScanAverage:

4

.236

Maximum:

9.6

6

Minimum:

0.0

9

No.

ofPoints:

18


LuminaireType:

GreenGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,0

00

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

36

AvgKW:

56.3

(61.2

max)



dfortheratedlife

ofthelamp.







nts:RefertoAmperage







designlocations.

RY

o13

LES

h


20/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMAR



SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,

201


LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

Eric

Svenby

File#/Date:

153689R9

06-Jun-1

10

10

20

20

30

30

4

0

40

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

A2

0.

01

0.

01

0.

05

0.

16

0.

29

0.

61

1.

01

0.

98

0.

81

0.

78

0.

98

1.

22

1.

10

0.

69

0.

53

0.

31

0.

23

0.

16

0

.1

1

0.

07

0.0

5

0.0

3

0.0

2

0.0

2

0.0

1

0.0

1

SCALEIN

FEET1:150

0'

150'

300'

EQUIPMENTLIS

TFORAREASSHOWN

Po

le

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAMP

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

6

TOTALS

36

36

0

Polelocation(s)


to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:


Location:Eme

ryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Spill@N

orthCurb(acrossstreet)

Spacing:

30.0

'

Height:

3.0'

abovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINATION

SUMMARY

HORIZONTALFOOTCANDL

EntireGrid

ScanAverage:

0.394

Maximum:

1.2

2

Minimum:

0.0

1

No.

ofPoints:

26


LuminaireType:

GreenGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134,0

00

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

36

AvgKW:

56.3

(61.2

max)



dfortheratedlife

ofthelamp.





SeetheWarrantydocument

fordetails.


nts:RefertoAmperage







designlocations.

RY

co-1

3L

ES

h


21/369

ILLUMINATIONSUMMAR


partwithoutthewrittenconsentofMusc

SportsLighting,

LLC.

1981,


LLC.

ENGINEEREDDESIGN

By:

Eric

Svenby

File#/Date:

153

689R9

06-Jun-

10

10

20

20

30

30

4

0

40

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

B2

B1

C2

A1

C1

A2

0.

03

0.

07

0.

27

0.

49

0.

69

1.

16

1.

89

1.

97

1.7

0

1.

50

1.

65

1.

95

1.

77

1.

41

1.

25

0.

97

0.

75

0.

55

0

.4

1

0.

30

0.2

3

0.1

7

0.1

4

0.1

1

0.0

9

0.0

7

SCALEIN

FEET1:150

0'

150'

300'

EQUIPMENTLIS

TFORAREASSHOWN

Po

le

Lum

inaires

QTY

LOCATION

SIZE

GRADE

ELEVATION

MOUNTING

HEIGHT

LAM

P

TYPE

QTY/

POLE

THIS

GRID

OTHER

GRIDS

1

A1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

A2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

B1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

B2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

C1

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

1

C2

80'

0'

80'

1500W

MZ

6

6

0

6

TOTALS

36

36

0

Polelocation(s)


to0,0

referencepoint(s)

MYPROJECTN

ame:


Location:Emeryville

,CA

GRIDSUMMARY

Name:

Spill@N

orthCurb(acrossstreet)

Spacing:

30.0'

Height:

3.0'abovegrade

CONSTANTILLUMINATION

SUMMARY

MAXVERTICALFOOTCAND

EntireGrid

ScanAverage:

0.830

Maximum:

1.9

7

Minimum:

0.0

3

No.

ofPoints:

26


LuminaireType:

GreenGeneration

RatedLampLife:

5,00

0hours

AvgLumens/Lamp:

134

,000

AvgLampTiltFactor:

1.00

0

No.

ofLuminaires:

36

AvgKW:

56.3

(61.2

max)



dfortheratedlife

ofthelamp.

FieldMeasurements:Illuminationmeasuredinaccordancewit



SeetheWarrantydocument

fordetails.


nts:RefertoAmperage



InstallationRequirements:R

esultsassume+/-3%




designlocations.


22/369


23/369

APPENDIX B

AIR QUALITY MODELING DATA


24/369


25/369

17.40 17.40 0.15 0.00 21. 730.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Water

37.45 0.00 37.45 2.21 0.00 83.930.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

583. 96 583. 96 0. 03 0. 00 584 .49

Waste

0.04 0.76 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.00Mobile 0.41 0.74 3.42 0.01 0.72

0. 00 285. 87 285. 87 0. 01 0. 01 287 .650.00 0.01 0.00 0.01

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.01 0.08 0.07 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Area 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00

CH4 N2O CO2e

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive

PM2.5

Exhaust

PM2.5

PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10

Exhaust

PM10

PM10 Total

4 9. 94 9 23 .6 2 9 73 .5 6 3 .1 4 0 .0 1 1 ,0 42 .3 90.72 0.04 0.77 0.01 0.03 0.05

17.40 17.40 0.15 0.00 21. 73

Total 1.05 0.85 3.51 0.01

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Water

49.94 0.00 49.94 2.95 0.00 111.910.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

583. 96 583. 96 0. 03 0. 00 584 .49

Waste

0.04 0.76 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.00Mobile 0.41 0.74 3.42 0.01 0.72

0. 00 322. 26 322. 26 0. 01 0. 01 324 .260.00 0.01 0.00 0.01

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.01 0.11 0.09 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Area 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00

CH4 N2O CO2e

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive

PM2.5

Exhaust

PM2.5

PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2

2.2 Overall Operational

Unmitigated Operational


PM10

Exhaust

PM10

PM10 Total

0.00 50 2.25 50 2.25 0.07 0.0 0 503 .720.03 0.31 0.34 0.01 0.31 0.32

1.62 1.62 0.00 0.00 1.62

Total 2.30 4.84 3.53 0.01

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002012 1.29 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00

0. 00 500. 63 500. 63 0. 07 0. 00 502 .100.03 0.31 0.34 0.01 0.31 0.32

N2O C O2e

Year tons/yr MT/yr

2011 1.01 4.83 3.52 0.01

Exhaust

PM2.5

PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

Mitigated Construction


PM10

Exhaust

PM10

PM10 Total Fugitive

PM2.5

50 2.25 50 2.25 0.07 0.0 0 503 .720.31 0.42 0.01 0.31 0.32 0.00Total 2.30 4.84 3.53 0.01 0.11

0.00 1.62 1.62 0.00 0.00 1.620.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

500. 63 500. 63 0. 07 0. 00 502 .10

2012 1.29 0.01 0.01 0.00

0.31 0.42 0.01 0.31 0.32 0.002011 1.01 4.83 3.52 0.01 0.11

NBio- CO2 Tota l CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year tons/yr MT/yr

ExhaustPM10

PM10 Total FugitivePM2.5

ExhaustPM2.5

PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction

Unmitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 FugitivePM10

Project Characteristics -

Land Use - Recreational - Community Gym, Multi Purpose Room

Construction Phase -

Vehicle Trips - trip generation from TIA

Energy Mitigation -

Waste Mitigation -

Climate Zone 5 2.2

Precipitation Freq (Days)

1.3 User Entered Comments 64

User Defined Recreational 53.28 User Defined Unit

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Utility Company Pacific Gas & E lectric CompanyUrbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)

High School 340 Student

Library 5.42 1000sqft

Medical Office Building 2.96 1000sqft

Elementary School 780 Student

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric

General Office Building 4.99 1000sqft

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1.1 Date: 6/6/2013

Emeryville Center for Community Life

Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics


26/369



Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristi cs

1.1 Land Usage









Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric CompanyUrbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)

Climate Zone 5 2.2







Energy Mitigation -

Waste Mitigation -

2.0 Emissio ns Summary

Exhaust

PM10

PM10 Total NBio- CO2 Total CO2




PM10

CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive

PM2.5

Exhaust

PM2.5

PM2.5

Total

Bio- CO2

Area 3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.07 0.59 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 710.28 0.01 0.01 714.60

Mobile 3.36 5.59 25.94 0.06 6.85 0.29 7.13 0.10 0.24 0.34 5,272.86 0.21 5,277.18

Total 6.86 6.18 26.44 0.06 0.01 5,991.786.85 0.29 7.17 0.10 0.24 0.38

Exhaust

PM10

PM10 Total

5,983.14 0.22

NBio- CO2 Total CO2



PM10

CH4 N2O CO2e


Fugitive

PM2.5

Exhaust

PM2.5

PM2.5

Total

Bio- CO2

Area 3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.05 0.46 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 550.77 0.01 0.01 554.13

Mobile 3.36 5.59 25.94 0.06 6.85 0.29 7.13 0.10 0.24 0.34 5,272.86 0.21 5,277.18

Total 6.84 6.05 26.33 0.06 6.85 0.29 7.16 0.10 0.24 0.37 5,823.63 0.22 0.01 5,831.31


27/369

5,363.97 0.20 0.01 5,371.306.85 0.29 7.16 0.10 0.24 0.37

4,813.20 0.19 4,817.17

Total 6.88 6.20 26.96 0.06

0.29 7.13 0.10 0.24 0.34Mobile 3.40 5.74 26.57 0.06 6.85

550.77 0.01 0.01 554.130.00 0.03 0.00 0.03

0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.05 0.46 0.39 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Area 3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00

CH4 N2O CO2e


Fugitive

PM2.5

Exhaust

PM2.5

PM2.5

Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2



PM10

Exhaust

PM10

PM10 Total

5,523.48 0.20 0.01 5,531.776.85 0.29 7.17 0.10 0.24 0.38

4,813.20 0.19 4,817.17

Total 6.90 6.33 27.07 0.06

0.29 7.13 0.10 0.24 0.34Mobile 3.40 5.74 26.57 0.06 6.85

710.28 0.01 0.01 714.600.00 0.04 0.00 0.04

0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.07 0.59 0.50 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Area 3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00

CH4 N2O CO2e


Fugitive

PM2.5

Exhaust

PM2.5

PM2.5

Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2




PM10

Exhaust

PM10

PM10 Total

2.0 Emissio ns Summary





Energy Mitigation -

Waste Mitigation -

Climate Zone 5 2.2





Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric CompanyUrbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)





1.1 Land Usage





Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristi cs


28/369


29/369

APPENDIX C

CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY AND

HISTORICAL EVALUATION


30/369


31/369

C U L T U R A L R E S O U R C E S S T U D Y A

H I S T O R I C A L E V A L U A T I O N O F T

E M E R Y V I L L E C E N T E R O F C O M M U

L I F E P R O J E C T

E M E R Y V I L L E , A L A M E D A C O U N T Y

C A L I F O R N I A


32/369


33/369

C U L T U R A L R E S O U R C E S S T U D Y A N

H I S T O R I C A L E V A L U A T I O N O F T H

E M E R Y V I L L E C E N T E R O F C O M M U N

L I F E P R O J E C T

EMERYVILLE, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Submitted to:

Roy MillerEmery Unified School District

4727 San Pablo AvenueEmeryville, California 94608

Prepared by:

E. Timothy Jones, M.A., RPA #15531

Michael Hibma, M.A., RPH #603LSA Associates, Inc.

157 Park PlacePoint Richmond, California 94801

(510) 236-6810www.lsa-assoc.com

LSA Project #EVU1201

January 2013


34/369

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . C U L T U R A L R E S O U R C E S S T U D Y A N D H I S T O RJ A N U A R Y 2 0 1 3 E M E R Y V I L L E C E N T E R O F C O M M U NE M E R Y V I L L E , A L A M E D A C O U

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................

LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY CONTEXTS ......................................................California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ...........................................

California Register of Historical Resources .................................................California Public Resources Code 5097.5 ..................................................California Health and Safety Code 7050.5 .................................................

PROJECT SETTING .........................................................................................................Environmental Setting ..................................................................................

Cultural Setting .............................................................................................METHODS .........................................................................................................................

Records Searches ..........................................................................................

Native American Heritage Commission .......................................................University of California Museum of Paleontology ......................................

Literature Review .........................................................................................

Archival Research .........................................................................................Field Survey ..................................................................................................

STUDY RESULTS ............................................................................................................Record Searches ...........................................................................................

Native American Heritage Commission .......................................................University of California Museum of Paleontology ......................................Literature Review .........................................................................................

Archival Research ........................................................................................Field Survey ..................................................................................................

ELIGIBILITY EVALUATIONS .......................................................................................Historical Context .........................................................................................

Architectural Context ....................................................................................Application of Significance Criteria ............................................................

CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................

RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................Archaeological Monitoring and Evaluation Plan .........................................Accidental Discovery of Paleontological Resources ....................................

REFERENCES CONSULTED .........................................................................................

FIGURES


35/369


INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of an eligibility evaluation conducted by LSA Associate

for three, single-story International Style buildings owned by the Emery Unified Schoo

1100 47th Street, Emeryville, Alameda County (Figures 1 and 2). The project site comp049-1181-001 in the eastern portion of Emeryville.

LSA conducted background research, a field survey, and resource recordation to prepar

The evaluation addresses the significance criteria of the California Register of Historica

This report includes (1) a description of the regulatory context for cultural resources at

site; (2) a summary of the methods used to prepare the analysis; (3) a description of the

the project site and their historical context; and (4) an eligibility evaluation.

SonomaNapa

S O N O M A


36/369

Project Location

80

Emeryville

Sausalito

Novato

Sonoma

380

238

280

80

880

580

580

780

680

580

101

101

101

101

82

4

1

35

92

238

San Francisco

Fremont

Oakland

Concord

Vallejo

Berkeley

Hayward

Sunnyvale

Pleas

SanLeandro

Union City

Walnut Creek

Daly City

RedwoodCity

South San Francisco

MilpitaPaloAlto

Pittsb

Richmond

San Rafael

SanMateo

Fairfield

Alameda

CastroValley

C O

M A R I N

N A P A

S A NF R A N C I S C O

S A NM A T E O

S O L A N O


37/369

Project Area

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . C U L T U R A L R E S O U R C E S S T U D Y A N D H I S T O R


38/369

J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 3 E M E R Y V I L L E C E N T E R O F C O M M U NE M E R Y V I L L E , A L A M E D A C O U

LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY CONTEXTS

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

CEQA applies to all discretionary projects undertaken or subject to approval by the stateagencies (California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 14(3) 15002(i)). Under the provCEQA, A project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the sig

historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment (C14(3) 15064.5(b)).

CEQA 15064.5(a) defines a historical resource as a resource which meets one or mofollowing criteria:

Listed in, or eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources;

Listed in a local register of historical resources (as defined at PRC 5020.1(k));

Identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of

the Public Resources Code; or

Determined to be a historical resource by a project's lead agency (CCRTitle 14(3)

A historical resource consists of Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, recor

manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant iarchitectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, politica

cultural annals of CaliforniaGenerally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agenhistorically significant if the resource meets the criteria for listing in the California ReHistorical Resources (CCR Title 14(3) 15064.5(a)(3)).

CEQA requires that historical resources and unique archaeological resources be taken in

consideration during the CEQA planning process (CCR Title 14(3) 15064.5; PRC 21feasible, adverse effects to the significance of historical resources must be avoided, or th

mitigated (CCR Title 14(3) 15064.5(b)(4)). The significance of a historical resource iswhen a project demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical charhistorical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility fo

California Register of Historical Resources. If there is a substantial adverse change in thof a historical resource, the preparation of an environmental impact report may be requiTitle 14(3) 15065(a))



39/369


unique archaeological resource will also meet the definition of a historical resource (Baand Bogdan 1999:105). CEQA defines a unique archaeological resource as an archae

artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely acurrent body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets one or more of the fcriteria:

Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and

demonstrable public interest in that information; or

Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best av

example of its type; or

Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or histor

person (PRC 21083.2(g)).

If an impact to a historical or archaeological resource is significant, CEQA requires fea

to minimize the impact (CCR Title 14(3) 15126.4 (a)(1)). Mitigation of significant implessen or eliminate the physical impact that the project will have on the resource. Generdrawings, photographs, and/or displays does not mitigate the physical impact on the envcaused by demolition or destruction of a historical resource. However, CEQA requires tfeasible mitigation be undertaken even if it does not mitigate impacts to a less than sign

(California Office of Historic Preservation 2001a:9; see also CCR Title 14(3) 15126.4

California Register of Historical Resources

Section 5024.1 of the PRC established the California Register of Historical Resources (Generally, a resource is considered by the lead agency to be historically significant if

meets the criteria for listing on the California Register (CCR Title 14(3) 15064.5(a)(3cultural resource to qualify for listing in the California Register it must be significant unmore of the following criteria:

Criterion 1: Associated with events that have made a significant contribution topatterns of Californias history and cultural heritage;

Criterion 2: Associated with the lives of persons important in our past; Criterion 3: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, o

construction, or represents the work of an important creative indivipossesses high artistic values; or

Criterion 4: Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory.

I dditi t b i i ifi t d f th it i t t



40/369


California Public Resources Code 5097.5

California Public Resources Code 5097.5 prohibits excavation or removal of any vert

paleontological siteor any other archaeological, paleontological or historical feature, public lands, except with express permission of the public agency having jurisdiction ovlands. Public lands are defined to include lands owned by or under the jurisdiction of th

city, county, district, authority or public corporation, or any agency thereof. Section 509any unauthorized disturbance or removal of archaeological, historical, or paleontologica

sites located on public lands is a misdemeanor.

California Health and Safety Code 7050.5

Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code states that in the event of discorecognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, therfurther excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to

adjacent remains until the coroner of the county in which the remains are discovered hawhether or not the remains are subject to the coroners authority. If the human remains

American origin, the coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission wof this identification. The Native American Heritage Commission will identify a Native

Most Likely Descendant (MLD) to inspect the site and provide recommendations for thtreatment of the remains and associated grave goods.

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . C U L T U R A L R E S O U R C E S S T U D Y A N D H I S T O RJ A N U A R Y 2 0 1 3 E M E R Y V I L L E C E N T E R O F C O M M U N


41/369

E M E R Y V I L L E , A L A M E D A C O U

PROJECT SETTING

Environmental Setting

The 7.7-acre project site is located at 1100 47th Street in unsectioned land of Rancho Sa

& D Peralta), Township 1 South/Range 4 West, Mount Diablo Base Line and Meridianthe accompanying portion of the U.S. Geological Survey Oakland West, Calif. 7.5-minu

topographic quadrangle (Figure 2). The project site is generally bound by 53rd Street toPablo Avenue to the east, 47th Street to the south, and Emery Bay Village (a residentialneighborhood) to the west.

The project site is approximately 40 feet above mean sea level on a nearly level alluvial

gentle downhill gradient to the southwest. Based on three geotechnical borings complet

Engineers, the project sites subsurface geological conditions consists of inter-layered fingered deposits of gravels, sand, silt, and clay, and their mixtures, typical of alluvial d

(BAGG Engineers 2009:16). Holocene (10,000 years before present [B.P.] to present) adeposits underlie the project site and are likely underlain by older Pleistocene (2.6 milli

years B.P.) alluvium.

The Natural Resources Conservation Service (2012) classifies soils in the project site as

and urban land-Clear Lake Complex. Urban land consists of fill from mixed sources; soil is formed in alluvium derived mainly from sedimentary sources and tends to be ver

poorly drained.

The closest natural water sources to the project site are Temescal Creek, which once flothe center of the project site but has since been routed through a culvert; and San Franciapproximately 3,500 feet to the west.

The native vegetation of the project site and vicinity consisted of a coastal prairie-scrub

(Kuchler 1977), characterized by dense bunchgrasses and forbs, including oatgrass (Da

californica) and red fescue (Festuca rubra).

Cultural Setting

The prehistory and ethnographic background of the project site are described below. Thcontext of the project site, because it is a component of the historical evaluation, is pres



42/369


The Paleo Period began with the first entry of people into California. These people probmainly on big game, minimally processed plant foods, and had few or no trade network

research, however, is indicating more sedentism, plant processing, and trading than prevbelieved. During the Lower Archaic, milling stones appear in abundance and hunting isthan plant foods. Artifacts are made predominantly from local materials, suggesting thatextensive trade networks were established at this time. During the Middle Archaic, the s

base begins to expand and diversify with a developing acorn economy, as evidenced by

and pestle, and the growing importance of hunting. Status and wealth distinctions are ev

Upper Archaic archaeological record; regional exchange networks are well established with exchange of goods and ideas, such as obsidian and Kuksu ceremonial practices invimpersonations. Increasing social complexity continued during the Lower Emergent. Te

boundaries were well established by this time with regularized inter-group exchanges in

and varied goods, people, and ideas. Bow and arrow technology was also introduced. BEmergent, a monetary system based on the exchange of clamshell disk beads was estab

population reached its zenith during this time, as evidenced by high site densities and lasites in the archaeological record.

Historically, archaeological excavations in the East Bay have focused on shellmounds. often contain a rich, diverse assemblage of dietary remains, artifacts, and human remainExcavations at two major shellmounds near the project sitethe Emeryville Shellmoun309, and the West Berkeley Shellmound, CA-ALA-307have helped refine our unders

Bay Areas earliest inhabitants. Excavations at the Emeryville Shellmound (Nelson 1991926; Uhle 1907) have identified hundreds of human burials, groundstone (e.g., mortarscharmstones), flaked stone (e.g., obsidian and chert projectile points and flaking debr

and dietary debris, including clams, mussels, oysters, and land and sea mammal bones.

Nelson (1996), and Bennyhoff (1986) have identified temporal changes in artifact typesrefuse, and human interments in multiple strata at the site. Excavations at the West BerkShellmound have identified an assemblage as diverse as the Emeryville Shellmounds, wcultural components; the oldest component is believed to predate 2000 B.C. and the ear

occupation of the Emeryville Shellmound (Wallace and Lathrap 1975:55, 58).

Ethnography. The project site is situated within territory once occupied by Costanoancommonly referred to as Ohlonelanguage groups. Eight mutually unintelligible Ohlonwere spoken in an area extending from the southern edge of the Carquinez Strait to port

Sur and Salinas rivers south of Monterey Bay (Shipley 1978). The Ohlone language spoeastern bayshore groups was Chochenyo, which was spoken by about 2,000 people fromMission San Jose and possibly as far east as the Livermore Valley (Levy 1978:485).

Ohlone territories were comprised of one or more land holding groups that anthropolog

ib l h ib l l i l h i i h h i lif i



43/369


Tribelet political organization included the position of chief (Levy 1978:487-488), who or her office patrilineally and required the communitys approval to assume the role. Al

chief had little coercive power over the population, administrative responsibilities and iaccompany the position. The chiefs responsibilities involved directing ceremonial activdances; caring for captive animals, including grizzly bears and coyotes; feeding visitingfrom other villages; and overseeing subsistence-related hunting and gathering activities

Ohlone groups employed a sexual division of labor to hunt and gather food. Women gat

processed a variety of nuts, seeds, and berries (Levy 1978:491). Important food staples acorns gathered from different oak species; nuts from the buckeye tree; hazelnuts; grassseeds from buttercup, chia, redmaids, tarweed, and grey pine; wild strawberries, elderbemadrone berries; and wild grapes. The diet was supplemented with hunting and gatherin

creek, shore, and terrestrial species (Levy 1978:491-492; Margolin 1978:40). Small crewere fished for trout, while groups with access to bay and estuarine resources acquired waterfowl, salmon, sturgeon, and lamprey eels. Larger terrestrial mammals (e.g., grizzlyRoosevelt elk, and black tailed deer) were hunted with the bow and arrow while commu

nets were used to capture smaller game (e.g., rabbits, mice, and rats).

Resources were distributed via trade networks between the Ohlone and neighboring gro1974:19). Ohlone traded abalone, mussels, salt, Olivella shells, and bows to the Sierra MYokuts groups to the east. Pinon nuts obtained from the Yokuts are the only ethnograph

documented import of Ohlone groups, although undoubtedly other significant economicincluding obsidian used for tools, were imported as well.

By the late eighteenth century, Spanish exploration and settlement of the Bay Area tran

Ohloneculture. Spanish settlers moved into northern California and established the misthat exposed the Ohloneto diseases to which they had no immunity. Mission records infirstHuchiun was baptized in 1787 with the first large group from that tribelet arriving Francisco in the fall of 1794 (Milliken 1995:243). Following the secularization of the m

1834, many Ohlone worked as manual laborers on ranchos (Levy 1978:486).



44/369


METHODS

Background research was done to identify cultural resources within and cultural resourc

the project site. The research consisted of record searches at the Northwest Information

Oakland Cultural Heritage Survey, the Native American Heritage Commission, the UniCalifornia Museum of Paleontology, archival research and a literature and map review.

County Historical Society was also consulted to determine if it has information or concecultural resources in the project site.

Records Searches

A records search of the project site was conducted on May 18, 2012, at the Northwest In

Center (NWIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System, Sonoma Sta

Rohnert Park. The NWIC, an affiliate of the State of California Office of Historic Preseofficial state repository of cultural resource records and reports for Alameda County.

As part of the records search LSA also reviewed the following State of California inven

cultural resources in and adjacent to the project site:

California Inventory of Historic Resources (California Department of Parks and Re1976);

Five Views: An Ethnic Historic Site Survey for California (California Office of HisPreservation 1988);

California Historical Landmarks (California Office of Historic Preservation 1996); California Points of Historical Interest(California Office of Historic Preservation 1 Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File (California Office of His

Preservation August 15, 2011). The directory includes the listings of the National RHistoric Places, National Historic Landmarks, the California Register of Historical

California Historical Landmarks, and California Points of Historical Interest.

Native American Heritage Commission

On May 29, 2012, LSA faxed a letter describing the project and a map depicting the proNative American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento requesting a review of

Lands File for any Native American cultural resources that might be affected by the pro



45/369

current project site. The purpose of the fossil locality search was to (1) identify knownpaleontological sites (fossils) in or near the project site, and (2) to identify the geologic

and types of fossils that might be expected within and adjacent to the project site based and paleontological data.

Literature Review

LSA reviewed the following publications, maps, and websites for historical information

project site and its vicinity:

Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks of San Francisco and Northern California (ASociety of Civil Engineers, San Francisco Section 1977);

California Place Names (Gudde 1998); Historic Spots in California (Hoover et al. 1990); California 1850: A Snapshot in Time (Marschner 2000); Historical Atlas of California (Hayes 2007); Oakland West, Calif., 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle (U.S. Geological Survey

1968, 1973, 1980, 1992, 1993);

Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Maps for Oakland(1902, 1911, 1951, 1953, 196 An Architectural Guidebook to San Francisco and the Bay Area (Cerny 2007); Online Archive of California at ; and Calisphere at http://www.calisphere.universityofcalifornia.edu.Archival Research

On May 18, 2012, LSA conducted archival research at the Oakland Cultural Heritage Soffice. The OCHS, a department within the City of Oakland, is the Citys repository forarchitectural survey data compiled by OCHS staff. The OCHS has ranked most building

according to the Citys own rating system, as described in the City of Oaklands HistoriElements of its General Plan. Materials reviewed included historical maps and OCHS susheets completed during OCHS field surveys adjacent to the project site in 1986. Resear

to determine if the project may affect adjacent historical resources identified by OCHS

Field Survey

LSA architectural historian Michael Hibma, M.A., conducted a field survey of the projesurrounding neighborhood on May 25, 2012. The exterior of the District Administration



46/369

STUDY RESULTS

This section presents the results of the LSA background research and field survey.

Record SearchesThe NWIC records search indicated that there are no previously recorded cultural resou

the project site and no previous cultural resources studies of the project site. Prehistoricarchaeological sites have been identified, however, to the west of the project site along Creek, consisting of CA-ALA-309 (Emeryville Shellmound), CA-ALA-310, CA-ALA

ALA-312, CA-ALA-313, and P-01-010873. Although these sites have been severely imdevelopment, significant portions of these sites may exist subsurface. In addition, histor

archaeological site CA-ALA-634H/P-01-010978 was identified south of the project site

construction of the Pixar Animation Studio campus. This deposit consisted mostly of glceramics associated with establishments that existed in area ca. 1848-1950s, including s

rooming houses, and stables.

Native American Heritage Commission

Debbie Pilas-Treadway, NAHC Environmental Specialist III, responded in a faxed lette2012 that a review of the Sacred Lands File has failed to indicate the presence of Nativ

cultural resources in the immediate project area.

University of California Museum of Paleontology

The UCMP fossil locality search did not identify localities in or adjacent to the project the same Late Pleistocene deposits that underlie the general vicinity, however, have beeindicating general paleontological sensitivity. There is the possibility of encountering si

paleontological resources in the Pleistocene alluvium that is overlain by Holocene alluv

Literature Review

LSA reviewed ethnographic and archaeological information about the project site and itdetermine the potential for Native American archaeological deposits and human remain

Native American sites are along the Temescal Creek drainage, no such prehistoric or etsites were identified in the project site in the literature (Kroeber 1925; Nelson 1909), al

potential exists that Native American sites and remains underlie fill and existing constru



47/369

end of the site, and Emery High School was present at the east end of the site along SanAvenue.

Historical Aerial Photograph Review. A 1931 aerial photograph depicts the former School (built 1920) at the northwest corner of 47th Street and San Pablo Avenue. An op

field/playground is at the rear of the building. To the west and south are open areas, witdevelopment closer to the bayshore and railroad tracks.

A 1946 aerial photograph depicts a heavily transformed urban landscape with major resdevelopments to the north across 53rd Street and to the east across San Pablo Avenue. W

project site a new gymnasium building is west of the Emery High School building. To tpresent-day Emery School District Administration Offices building. Sanborn Fire InsurMaps for 1951 call this building a City Library. North of and adjacent to the library buiwarehouse building.

A 1959 aerial photograph depicts similar features and land use patterns as shown in the photograph. The project sites western property line is clearly demarcated by trees. The

Emery High School building is depicted along with the gymnasium, as described aboveof the high school building, the City Library (District Administrative Offices) and form

storage warehouse described above are depicted. To the west and south of the library arBuilding and a rectangular Central Plant Building.

The 1968 and 1980 aerial photographs depict the current building footprints and spatialof the project site.

Please see the References Consulted section for a complete list of materials reviewed.

Archival Research

The OCHS records indicate that it has surveyed residential properties along the north sidStreet and San Pablo Avenue adjacent to the project site. The OCHS has rated several o

residential properties as Dc3 or provided no rating due to a lack of apparent significanof the survey. As detailed in the City of Oaklands Historic Preservation Element Dc3

building that is not within a historic district and is of Minor Importance with a potent

of Secondary Importance through rehabilitation.

Field Survey

A cultural resources field survey of the project site was conducted by an LSA archaeoloLSA architectural historian on May 25, 2012. The survey was done to (1) examine build



48/369

silty-sandy loam and were a light-brown sandy loam at the athletic field. No archaeologwere identified during the field survey.

The built environment field survey of the project site identified the Emeryville School AOffice District (District) which comprises three contributing elements . Each element is

below.

District Administrative Offices Building. Built in 1949 and located at 1727 San Pablo

single-story, 2,251-square-foot wood-frame building is designed in a vernacular adaptaInternational Style. The building is done in a rectangular-plan, finished in textured stucccapped by a flat roof. The primary faade is symmetrical in design, faces San Pablo Aveast, and is totally obscured from the street by a 10-foot high concrete wall with an aggr

finish. The main entrance is located underneath a flat-roofed canopy subsequently addemimics the design motifs of the Emery Secondary School campus. The entrance consistreplacement glazed door set in an aluminum frame underneath a recessed arched entrywfixed pane dimpled glass. A brick-masonry chimney is located on the south faade. Fen

consists is an assortment of aluminum-framed slider windows and sash windows in the

wooden frames. One window on the left side of the south faade has been removed andfilled in with stucco-clad wood framing. There is an approximately 850-square-foot undon the rear of building. Originally constructed as the Emeryville City Library, this buildcurrently used as administrative office space for the Emery Unified School District.

Music Building.Built in 1957 and located approximately 10 feet to the west of the AdBuilding, this two-story, 2,331-square-foot wood-frame is designed in a vernacular adap

International Style. The rectangular-plan building, finished in textured stucco, is capped

The primary faade is asymmetrical in design with the metal entrance door set underneacantilevered boxed overhang. Fenestration consists of variously-sized multi-paned metawindows of dimpled, opaque glass with inset wire meshing

ECCL Neg Dec Technical Appendices

Documents

Transcript of ECCL Neg Dec Technical Appendices