East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition Parry Klassen Executive Director Merced River

44
East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition Parry Klassen Executive Director Merced River

description

East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition Parry Klassen Executive Director Merced River. In operation since 2003 2,297 Landowner / operators 540,782 irrigated acres Madera, Merced, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Mariposa counties We manage group permit for our members. Coalition Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition Parry Klassen Executive Director Merced River

East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition

Parry KlassenExecutive Director

Merced River

In operation since 2003 2,297 Landowner / operators 540,782 irrigated acres

• Madera, Merced, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Mariposa counties

We manage group permit for our members

Coalition Overview

Board of Directors

Board Officers Parry Klassen, Board Chairman Coalition for Urban Rural

Executive Director Environmental Stewardship; fruit grower Wayne Zipser, Vice-Chairman Stanislaus Co. Farm Bureau Bill McKinney, Treasurer almond grower

Board Members Amanda Carvajal Merced Co. Farm Bureau John Eisenhut Hilltop Ranch, almond grower Brian Franzia West Coast Vineyards Richard Gemperle Gemperle Enterprises, almond grower Anja K. Raudabaugh Madera Co. Farm Bureau Alan Reynolds Gallo Vineyards, Inc. Albert Rossini Rossini Ag, grape grower Jim Wagner Wilbur Ellis Co. Mike Neimi Turlock Irrigation District

Non-voting Gary Caseri Stanislaus County Agricultural Commissioner David Robinson Merced County Agricultural Commissioner Bob Rolan Madera County Agricultural Commissioner Dianna Waller Natural Resources Conservation Service Dennis Wescot San Joaquin River Group Authority

How many acres are you farming?

0%

0%1. Under 100

2. Over 100

Are you a Coalition member?

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

Would you be willing to stay an extra ½ hour if needed?

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

RWB Slide Presentation

1984-2004

2005-2010

Waste Discharge Requirements Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program

ESJWQC Approach

• Classification of vulnerable areas

• Well head protection program

• Nitrogen management plans

Waste Discharge RequirementsIrrigated Lands Regulatory Program

Assessment Report (due January 2014)

• Rank land vulnerability based on Assessment Report • High Vulnerability

Areas ID’d using DPR pesticide groundwater protection areas, State

Water Board vulnerable areas

• 2014: Farm assessment requirement starts

• 2014: Nitrogen budget requirement starts

• 2014 Well head protection

• Low Vulnerability• Keep farm assessment/nitrogen budgets on farm

ILRP Draft Vulnerable

Areas

Sta

ni

sla

us

C

ou

nty

Vulnerable Areas

Wellhead Protection BMPs

Wellhead house keeping• Prevent ponding for extended periods

• Waste can enter if wellhead/casing is cracked or improperly sealed

• Grade away from wellhead to prevent storm runoff ponding

Open discharge well• Air gap between well discharge and

receiving device

Pressurized systems: Back flow preventers• In case of power failures and/or pump

malfunction • Back siphoning can directly

contaminate groundwater

Abandoned wells• Develop plan to manage

Nitrogen Management Plan Components

Apply N at crop removal rates• Dairies regulated to 140% of crop use (N applications)

Test well water for nitrogen levels (then adjust N applications accordingly)

Leaf / tissue testing Soil testing

Irrigation management

Proposed reporting of nitrogen budget sheet information:

Submit form to Coalition

Coalition compiles ratios; separates into crops, “reporting areas”

“Reporting area” depends on aquifer, basin, sub basins, soil types etc.

Field Reporting Map Completed by Grower

Potentially applying too much N (outliers)

1.0

2.3

3.7

5.0

Almonds Corn Tomatoes

Reported Nitrogen Ratios

Crop

Ra

tio

Most growers (UC recommended rates)

What the area report should show:

Where most growers are with nitrogen ratios

The “Outliners:” those who apply too much or too little

Focus of outreach with commodity specific information/references

Waste Discharge RequirementsIrrigated Lands Regulatory Program

Representative Monitoring

Confirm that management practices implemented to improve groundwater quality are working

Are agricultural management practices protective of groundwater in high vulnerability areas

Assess effectiveness of any newly implemented management practices.

Coalition to rank/prioritize high vulnerability areas and commodities and present phased approach

Coordinated effort by coalitions/commodity groups to complete

Waste Discharge RequirementsIrrigated Lands Regulatory Program

Regional Water Board process

Next steps• Public review of draft WDR

• Comment deadline July 31, 2012

• October 4, 2012 Regional Water Board ILRP meeting• Approve or delay?

• After passage, ESJ has 30 days to apply to be Third Party

• 120 day “holiday” to join coalition directly • Holiday ends February 1, 2013 (approximate)

Would you be willing to work with a CCA to complete a nitrogen balance sheet?

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

Do you sample your supply for nitrate levels?

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

Do you adjust your fertilizer applications based on the

nitrate levels?

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

What is the most important factor in determining your nitrogen application rate for

each field?

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

1. Field history of nitrogen applications

2. Soil nitrogen test

3. Leaf/Peliole test

4. Nitrate level in supply water

5. Other

What is the second most important factor in determining your nitrogen application rate for

each field?

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

1. Field history of nitrogen applications

2. Soil nitrogen test

3. Leaf/Peliole test

4. Nitrate level in supply water

5. Other

Would you log on to a secure internet site to fill out Coalition

forms?

0%

0%

0%

0%

1. No, not interested

2. I’d need lots of assistance

3. I’d need some assistance

4. Yes, without assistance

Is land around your well head graded to drain stormwater

away?

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

Do you have non operating wells on your property?

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

If using pressurized system, do you have a backflow prevention device

on the wellhead?

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

Should ESJ add a member service that seeks quantity discounts for

member needs? (ala farmer cooperative seeking quantity discount)

0%

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

3.Not Sure

Identify company(s) to perform well water testing for N levels?

(Deliver own sample)

0%

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

3.Not Sure

Identify company(s) that performs well sampling/analysis/applied N

calculation? (Full service)

0%

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

3.Not Sure

Identify company(s) for well destruct/sealing?

0%

0%

0%1.Yes

2.No

3.Not Sure

How long should we wait until our next update meeting?

0%

0%

0%

1. August (after comment period)

2. October (after Board vote)

3. December (ESJ annual meetings)

What is the best way to reach non-members about the sign up

holiday?

0%

0%

0%

0%

1. Mailings

2. Farm Bureau Newspapers

3. Local Newspapers

4. Letter From Water Board to Non-Member

Should we hold an early evening meeting in August (5-7pm)?

0%

0%

0%

1. Yes

2. No

3. Better to have it midday

Was this meeting:

0%

0%

0%

1. Too long

2. Not long enough

3. About right

Parry Klassen

559-288-8125

www.esjcoalition.org