East Cleveland

Property Inventory

report

Western Reserve Land Conservancy

Thriving Communities Institute

October 2014

2

3

Thanks to those who made this project possible

Footbridge at Forest Hills Park in East Cleveland http://connect.cleveland.com/user/npaige/photos.html

This report was made possible through the generosity of the Cleveland Foundation, whose commitment to greater Cleveland and its neighborhoods has had a significant positive impact on our region. We would also like to thank the City of East Cleveland and its' Mayor, Gary Norton Jr. and Michael Smedley, the Mayor's executive assistant, who spent hours helping to formulate this study. We would also like to thank Northeast Ohio Alliance for Hope (NOAH) and the staff that participated in this survey work that included Trevelle Harp, BJ (Dana) Eddings, Pia Hoffman, Kelvin Tolbert, Che Gadison and Gloria Smith Morgan. A commitment of col-laboration from these partners and individuals contributed to success of this project.

4

W estern Reserve Land Conservancy is a nonprofit conser-

vation organization dedicated to preserving the natural

resources of northern Ohio. We work with landowners, commu-

nities, government agencies, park systems and other nonprofit

organizations to permanently protect natural areas and farm-

land. In March 2011, Western Reserve Land Conservancy

launched Thriving Communities Institute, a region-wide effort to

help revitalize our urban centers, and named nationally known

expert Jim Rokakis as its director.

Today, Thriving Communities is working with communities and organizations throughout the region

to transform vacant and unproductive properties into new opportunities to attract economic

growth, add green space to our cities and support safe, beautiful neighborhoods. Our cities have

thrived in the past, and we believe they will thrive again in the future.

TCI was established to create an urban presence in the cities of Northeast Ohio. The primary objec-

tive was to establish County Land Reutilization Corporations, commonly referred to as county land

banks, in these counties to give communities additional blight fighting tools. The mission of TCI

expanded to include the raising of additional funds to remove blighted properties from these com-

munities. To date TCI has raised 182 million dollars for blight removal statewide. Most recently,

TCI played a critical role in convincing Cuyahoga County government to issue 50 million dollars in

demolition bonds. The County has stressed the need to be strategic in the expenditure of these

dollars. The detailed survey work provided by the property analysis contained herein will allow for

a strategic expenditure of these funds and ensure that the City of East Cleveland will receive its fair

share of these demolition dollars—and other funds—as the community attempts to move forward

out of this crisis.

Western Reserve Land Conservancy’s Thriving Communities Institute:

Helping revitalize Ohio’s cities

5

East Cleveland Property Inventory Report

Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………6 Background………………………………………………………………………………………….7 How the Inventory Was Completed……………………………………………………..9 The “What”, “Where” and “Who” of East Cleveland’s Vacant and Occupied Properties ………………………………………………………..11 What’s Next? Charting a Land and Housing Plan Going Forward in East Cleveland………………………………………………………...14 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………….17 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………………….18 Overview Map…………………………………………………………………………………….19 Precinct Maps……………………………………………………………………………………..20

6

Executive Summary This report describes the findings of a property survey in the City of East Cleveland, Ohio. The survey was implemented by the Western Reserve Land Conservancy’s Thriving Communities Institute, in partnership with the Northeast Ohio Alliance for Hope (NOAH). The parcel-by-parcel sur-vey was undertaken to create a general inventory of the city’s housing stock and, in particular, the vacant, abandoned properties that can cause economic, social, and safety issues within a community.

In accordance with the East Cleveland’s mission to “pursue innovative governance that is accessible, accountable, efficient and stable,”1 this survey is a pioneering step towards data-driven demolition planning and will assist the City of East Cleveland in their four-pronged land and housing strategy to more effectively target blight moving forward. This strategy includes eliminating the threat of blight, maximizing return on investment, moving beyond blight-light (the reduced, but still present danger of vacant, abandoned lots), and infill development.

In addition to this document, the Western Reserve Land Conservancy provided a spreadsheet data-set and web-based mapping application, as well as visual aids in the form of tables and maps that will provide a com-prehensive view of the City’s housing stock.

Image 1: Photo of Survey Team

___________________ 1

See: http://www.eastcleveland.org/about/about-us-a-community-rising/.

East Cleveland

7

Background Once known as the “Beverly Hills of the North Coast”,2 the City of East Cleveland has spiraled into decline in recent years. The city faced periods of fiscal emergency caused by a declining property tax base, fiscal mis-management and political corruption. East Cleveland withstood more distress than any City of Cleveland neighborhood. This turmoil has contributed to a loss of confidence in the city and an out-migration of its population. However, the current Mayor of East Cleveland, Gary Norton Jr., perhaps the most involved and capable mayor that the city has seen in decades, in partnerships with the Cuyahoga County Land Bank and University Circle Incorporated, is moving the city in a positive direction.

A small city of only 3.1 square miles, East Cleveland hit its residential peak of approximately 40,000 residents in 1950. During this time, suburbs thrived as automobile dependence encouraged more and more Americans to live outside of the city. The city’s population was relatively stable until 1990, but as a result of the previ-ously mentioned issues, and the foreclosure crisis which ravaged East Cleveland just as it did City of Cleve-land neighborhoods, the number of East Cleveland residents declined from 33,096 in 1990 to 17,867 in 2010—a 46% decrease.

This population loss has been accompanied by an oversupply of housing stock. The number of housing units increased in East Cleveland until 1980, before decreasing from 15,168 in 1990 to 12,542 in 2010.3 However, Figure 1 shows that the population loss far outpaced the decrease in housing supply. The result has been an increase of vacant housing units in the city, which in turn has translated to an increase in vacant structures. There were 4,237 vacant housing units in East Cleveland by 2010, up from 2,268 in 2000. East Cleveland’s vacancy rate in 2010 stood at 34%, far worse than the 17% vacancy rate from ten years prior.4

The number of vacant structures presents challenges for East Cleveland. Vacant structures act as sites for crime,5 create health hazards and distress,6 and generally degrade quality of life.7 Additionally, these issues negatively affect property values.8 As indicated in Figure 2, blight and abandonment from the foreclosure crisis began to impact home sale prices throughout Cuyahoga County after 2006. Median home sales in 2000 were $62,475 and dropped to an all-time low of $2,500 in 2008. Some areas are beginning to show signs of slow recovery, but in 2013, the median home sale price in East Cleveland had only risen to $8,064.9 Such challenges act as “push” factors for ar-ea residents, referred to as the “flight from blight”.10 This out-migration of residents leads to further population loss and yet more vacant structures. Before long, widespread vacancy reduc-es city revenues.11

____________________ 2 Ibid. 3 Source: United States Decennial Census, 2000, 2010. 4 Ibid. 5 See: Spelman, W. 1993. Abandoned Buildings: Magnets For Crime? Journal of Criminal Justice Vol-ume: 21 Issue: 5 Pages: 481-495. 6 See: http://datatrends.fmhi.usf.edu/summary_28.pdf. 7 See: https://www.ptsdforum.org/c/gallery/-pdf/1-48.pdf. 8 See: http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/workpaper/2011/wp1123r.pdf. 9 Frank Ford, Thriving Communities Institute, reporting on data collected by NEO CANDO at Case Western Reserve University, October 2014. 10 See: http://apps.olin.wustl.edu/mba/casecompetition/PDF/2013OSCCCaseFinal.pdf. 11 See: http://communityresearchpartners.org/uploads/publications/FullReport_Nonembargoed.pdf.

8

The more vacant structures a city has to deal with, the less it has in the coffers to fund other city services—be it in public safety,12 parks and recreation, or infrastructure maintenance. For example, the City of East Cleveland has had to rely on other government entities to carry out its duties: the Cuyahoga County Sherriff’s department has been providing police support for the past several years, and the Cleveland Metroparks has been quietly helping to main-tain some East Cleveland parks.

Figure 2: Cuyahoga County Median 1-3 Family Home Sale Prices 2000 - 2013 Arms Length Sales13

Since 2010, East Cleveland, in partnership with the Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation (CCLRC, and commonly referred to as the Cuyahoga Land Bank), has utilized sources of federal funds14 to reduce the effects of blight on the community. One tool in this effort has been demolition. To date, CCLRC has demolished 282 of the city’s worst vacant properties, the majority of which have been residential apartment buildings and multifamily houses. Often, properties targeted for demolition are brought to the city’s attention by concerned residents. Once the vacant structure is removed, the response is relief. “I’m glad they tore [the houses] down,” said one East Cleveland resident to the Neighborhood Voice. “They were roach and rat infested.”15

There is strong evidence that demolitions have helped decrease the vacancy rate in East Cleveland. Perhaps not coin-cidentally, the city’s population has started to stabilize. Census estimates have shown less than a hundred residents were lost from 2012 to 2013.16 The hope is that this population stabilization continues as the city carries out its hous-ing and land strategy. The following analysis will serve as a guiding document toward the gradual rebirth of East Cleveland.

____________________ 12 A recently publicized tragedy in East Cleveland involved three female victims who were murdered in vacant and abandoned properties. 13 Arms Length Sales exclude Sheriff Sales, Sales to Banks and Federal Agencies, and $0 Dollar Transactions. 14 See: http://www.mortgageorb.com/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.15118. 15 See: http://www.neighborhood-voice.com/neighborhood-news/east-cleveland/east-cleveland-to-demolish-150-abandoned-and-vacant-properties/. 16 See: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/39/3923380.html.

9

How the Property Inventory Was Completed During early 2014, Western Reserve Land Conservancy’s Thriving Communities Institute, along with North-east Ohio Alliance for Hope (NOAH) under the supervision of Trevelle Harp, completed a comprehensive citywide property inventory. In partnership with East Cleveland officials, a team of six trained surveyors (which included East Cleveland residents) inventoried over 7,000 parcels across the city’s three wards. The surveyors photographed each parcel using a mobile device, and assessed whether a structure was present. If a structure was present, the surveyor determined whether it was vacant or occupied. Determining occupan-cy versus vacancy required a visual inspection governed by a number of uniformed guidelines. Additionally, the surveyors assessed and graded the condition of all vacant or occupied residential structures. The grading ranged from “A”, or “Excellent”, to “F”, or “Unsafe/Hazard”. All of the surveying took place from the side-walk. Additional criteria collected included: For Sale/Rent signs, Broken Windows, Boarded Windows/Doors, Dam-aged Roof, Chimney Damage, Missing/Deteriorated Siding, Peeling/Deteriorated Paint, Damaged Masonry/Foundation, Damaged Porch, Damaged/Deteriorated Stairs, Gutter/Downspout Damage, Garage Damage, Graffiti, Junk Cars, High Grass/Weeds, Trash/Debris on Property. This information will help inform City staff of some of the characteristics that contributed to the decision on grading. The following photos are examples of East Cleveland properties that were graded as part of the current re-port.

Image 2: East Cleveland Occupied House, Graded A:

10

Image 3: East Cleveland Occupied House, Graded B Image 4: East Cleveland Occupied House, Graded C

Image 5: East Cleveland Vacant House, Graded D Image 6: East Cleveland Occupied House, Graded F

11

The “What”, “Where” and “Who” of East Cleve-land’s Vacant and Occupied Properties

City-wide, 7,077 parcels were investigated and assessed, and 5,813 (82%) of these parcels contained a structure. There were 4,437 occupied structures counted, mak-ing up 63% of all parcels assessed, and 76% of all structures. There were 1,376 vacant structures counted, making up 19% of all assessed parcels, and 24% of all structures. Among the vacant structures, 954 (69%) of the them were secured, while 422 (31)% of them were open, and thus susceptible to entry.17 Moreover, 1,013 (14%) of all assessed parcels in East Cleveland contain vacant lots, which is evi-dence of demolition activity to date.

Map 1 in Appendix A details where every occupied and vacant structure is in the city of East Cleveland, as well as every vacant lot. The map depicts data collected during the inventory, which is also summarized in Figure 2.

Table 1 further breaks down these numbers. Of the 5,813 structures in East Cleveland, 76.3% were occupied. Over half of East Cleveland’s occupied structures were in “excellent” or “good” quality. Specifically, there were 1,067 structures graded “A” and 1,391 structures graded “B”. Less than 10% of East Cleveland’s occu-pied stock was in poorer condition (i.e., rated “D” or “F”). In other words, the city has a sound housing stock to work with in creating future strategies.

____________________________ 17 It must be noted that the determination of what was “open” was limited by what could be observed from the sidewalk. Addi-tional structures could have open rear entry doors and ground floor windows.

Table 1. Vacancy and Occupancy Survey for City of East Cleveland

Survey Counts Key Data

Occupied Structure - A 1066 Percent of Stock "A" or "B"

55.3%

Occupied Structure - B 1386

Occupied Structure - C 1568

Occupied Structure - D 374

Occupied Structure - F 40

Total Occupied 4437 Occupancy Rate 76.3%

Vacant Structure - A 29

Vacant Structure - B 57

Vacant Structure - C 259

Vacant Structure - D 526 Demolish-able 1030

Vacant Structure - F 504

Total Vacant 1376 Vacancy Rate 23.7%

12

In terms of vacancy, our survey found that East Cleveland has 1,376 vacant structures. This represents 19% of the 7,368 parcels in the municipality of East Cleveland. By comparison, in 2010, US Postal Data collected by Case Western Reserve University found 1,590 vacant structures, which represented 22% of the 7,368 par-cels in East Cleveland.18 This reduction in vacancy suggests that targeted demolition to date is beginning to have a positive impact on blight. However, issues remain as indicated by the low home sale prices cited above. Specifically, unlike the occupied structures, the quality of East Cleveland’s vacant structures is poor, with 1,030, or 75%, of its vacant structures graded as a “D” or “F”. These structures are prime targets in the city’s strategic demolition going forward.

Where are these blighted structures located? Also, where is the highest-rated housing stock? Answering these questions will further inform East Cleveland’s housing and development strategic framework.

An analysis of conditions was done for each of the eighteen East Cleveland precincts. Before detailing this, it is important to see whether there is a relationship between the concentration of vacant properties in a pre-cinct and the concentration of high-quality, occupied structures. The thinking being that the presence of blight can be “contagious” to the structures around it. A correlation was run between the percent of vacant structures in a precinct with the percent of high-quality structures. The results show a strong negative corre-lation of -.779, which suggests that a high quantity of vacant structures reduces the number of high-quality structures in an area. This can suggest that demolishing the worst vacant structures in each precinct may benefit the conditions of surrounding properties.

Figure 3 shows where each precinct stands in its frequency of vacant and high-quality structures. The pre-cincts with the highest percentages of vacancies are Precincts 3D (29.5% vacancy rate), 3E (25.8% vacancy rate), and 4A (27% vacancy rate). Each of these precincts has a vacancy rate above the city-wide average of 23.7% and together account for almost 30% of East Cleveland’s vacant properties. Conversely, the concen-tration of high-quality, occupied structures is more diffuse. In precincts 3C, 4D, 4E, 4C, and 2D, and 2A, a ma-jority of the structures are rated “Excellent” or “Very Good”. The implications of these findings will be dis-cussed in the final section below.

____________________ 18 NEO CANDO 2010+ system, Northeast Ohio Data Collaborative (http://neocando.case.edu/neocando/).

13

Who owns these vacant properties? In addition to our physical survey, we also scanned public records to determine ownership of the properties surveyed. We identified five categories of ownership: 1) banks and other financial institutions, which included government-sponsored enterprises, known as “GSE’s” such HUD and Fannie Mae, 2) the City of East Cleveland or other state and local government agencies, and non profit organizations, 3) corporations and other business entities, 4) individual investors who do not live in the prop-erty, and 5) homeowners who live in the property or still own it after vacancy.19

Overall, looking at all 7,077 properties surveyed, the largest number of properties (3,046 or 43%) are owned by individual absentee investors. Homeowners, at 31%, are the second largest category followed by govern-ment and non-profits (14%), and corporations and business entities (11%). Banks and other financial institu-tions own only 1% of the properties surveyed. The percentages for the 1,376 vacant structures, and the 1,030 vacant structures rated D and F (most blighted and distressed), are relatively constant, alt-hough homeowners who have vacated their homes make up the highest percent of vacant structures (40%), up from 31% of all surveyed properties.

The small number of bank-owned structures may ap-pear surprising at first, but not when a number of fac-tors are considered. First, foreclosure filings across the county have come down since their peak in 2007, although as of 2013 they were still double the rate of filings before the foreclosure crisis. Second, foreclos-ing financial institutions have become more adept at quickly moving properties out of their inventories, often to private investors who fail to maintain the properties. Third, in recent years, it has become more common for foreclosing banks to “walk-away” from the foreclosure case after getting judgment in court, but before taking title at Sheriff Sale. In this last circumstance, the original homeowner who was foreclosed on continues to be the owner of rec-ord, even though they have vacated the home.20 Thus, bank ownership indicated here may not be a true indi-cator of vacancy caused by bank foreclosure since those properties could now be owned by corporate or private investors, or still be owned by the homeowner no longer living at the property. ____________________ 19 Owner-occupants were identified using the 2.5% property tax reduction in public records. It must be assumed however, that some number of owners fail to apply for the 2.5% reduction, and in some cases the reduction may carry over to a new non-occupant owner, thus this count is an approximation. 20 The Role of Investors in the One-to-Three Family REO Market: The Case of Cleveland, Ford et al., 2013.

Table 2. Ownership of Vacant Properties in East Cleveland

14

What Next? Charting a Land and Housing Plan Going Forward in East Cleveland East Cleveland officials currently have a four-pronged land and housing strategy in place. The current analy-sis provides a detailed road map in helping city leaders implement their vision going forward, which includes the City’s existing strategy and a recommended fifth strategy.

Strategy 1—Eliminating Threat: A primary duty of

any city is to ensure safety and security of its resi-dents, and more generally to ensure residents’ qual-ity of life. When it comes to blight, East Cleveland officials must be able to identify vacant properties that pose an immediate threat to the safety and se-curity of its residents. As stated, open, blighted va-cant structures, such as the one shown in Image 7 on Shaw Avenue, present serious concerns to sur-rounding residents. With the property database and maps created as part of the inventory, East Cleve-land officials have the tools needed to make the city safer, thereby increasing its residents’ mental and physical well-being. In this way, East Cleveland can stem “flight from blight” by tackling the blight head-on. Image 7: Vacant structure on Shaw Avenue

Strategy 2—Maximizing the Return on Investment: A recent study commissioned by Thriving Communities

Institute showed that for every public dollar ($1) spent on demolition of vacant properties in Cuyahoga County, there was a return of $1.40 in home equity of nearby properties.21 This return was greatest when selective demolitions were done in areas where home values were highest. That said, a key component of East Cleveland’s housing and land strategy will be to undertake a street-level, selective demolition process in areas of moderate- to high-housing value. This maintenance approach will allow for a continued high-occupancy rate at the street level, as well as an increase in home equity for residents near the removal of a vacant, blighted structure.

Strategy 3—Beyond “Blight Light”: When a house is demolished, the resulting a vacant lot can be derisively

called blight light. While area residents often prefer a vacant lot to the presence of an unsafe vacant struc-ture, the lot can act as an eyesore, particularly when grass remains uncut or the lot is used as dumping ground. The current analysis allows East Cleveland officials to keep track of their vacant lot inventory to en-sure they are well kept and debris-free.

____________________ 21 See: http://www.thrivingcommunitiesinstitute.org/documents/FinalReportwithExecSummary_modified.pdf.

15

Beyond maintenance, a major goal of East Cleveland’s is to reuse many of the city’s vacant lots as places for green space, particularly as sites for tree planting. The plan would be to replicate the ongoing efforts in the City of Cleveland to re-forest the neighborhoods that have lost their tree canopy due to development.22 In a recent study completed by the Cuyahoga County Planning Commission, East Cleveland ranked 31st out of 59 cities in its existing tree canopy.23 The study showed that 20% of East Cleveland’s land area is not covered in concrete, making it suitable for tree planting. This potential for green space will increase as more vacant, blighted houses continue to be removed. Moving beyond vacant lots that have not been repurposed is an important aspect in East Cleveland’s livability initiatives, as parks and green space add to the city’s urban amenities to make the city more attractive to new and existing residents. Research has also shown that add-ing green space to a street adds to nearby home values.24

Strategy 4—Infill Development: The City of

East Cleveland sits at the edge of Cleveland’s Health Tech Corridor, which runs from Down-town Cleveland to University Circle along Euclid Avenue. The area has experienced $3 billion in investment,25 which means the Health Tech Corridor is quickly becoming the region’s “second downtown”. The Corridor, according to the City of Cleveland’s website, is “home to 75+ biomedical companies, 45 technology com-panies, 7 business incubators, 4 world-class healthcare and research systems including the Cleveland Clinic and University Hospitals, and 3 higher education institutions”.26 Job growth along this corridor increased by 22% according to a recent Cleveland State University report.27 Image 8: Circle East Townhomes

This growth has brought an increase in demand for new housing. In 2012, the Circle East Townhomes were completed in the City of East Cleveland to help meet this demand. In all, 20 units were built. As the region’s “second downtown” gets larger, infill development will continue into East Cleveland’s borders. This demand will play a huge role in the city’s land and housing strategy, particularly in the Precincts of 2B and 2D that border University Circle. To further attract development, city officials will use the survey to continue to put together a land acquisition strategy so that new housing can be developed, boosting not only population and city revenue, but city pride.

"Thousands of people work in University Circle," said nationally renowned urban planning expert Norm Krumholz, who is also an East Cleveland planning consultant.28 "This is something that instills hope. It's a great day."

____________________ 22 See: http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2014/03/cleveland_to_plant_1000_trees.html. 23 See: http://planning.co.cuyahoga.oh.us/canopy/communities.html. 24 See: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/FCRP021.pdf/$FILE/FCRP021.pdf. 25 See: http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/ed/index1.html. 26 Ibid. 27 See: http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2145&context=urban_facpub. 28 See: http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/09/east_cleveland_razing_63_aband.html.

16

Recommendation: Strategy 5— Enhanced and Targeted Code Enforcement: We recommend the City

of East Cleveland consider utilizing it’s code enforcement “police power” to adopt strategies that are tai-lored to match the type of ownership categories we found in our analysis. Following are four examples for consideration. Each of these strategies is designed to help a municipality recover the cost of demolition and nuisance abatement. Joint and Several Liability Ordinance. The City of Cleveland has enacted an ordinance which allows it to retroactively hold a prior owner accountable for demolition costs, provided the property was inspected and condemned during the prior ownership. This would be useful in cases where a foreclosing bank has taken ownership of a blighted structure but then sold it to an investor before the property is demolished. If the City of East Cleveland inspected and condemned the property during the bank’s ownership, the City would be able to go back to the bank and demand reimbursement. This would enable the City to stretch available demolition funding further. Foreclosure Bond Ordinance. As noted earlier, in some cases banks are filing foreclosure, causing the home to be vacated, then choosing not to take title at Sheriff Sale, thereby avoiding financial responsibility for blighted conditions. The City of Youngstown has enacted an innovative ordinance that requires foreclos-ing banks to post a $10,000 bond with the City. Whether or not the bank takes title at Sheriff Sale, the bond can be used by the City to offset the cost of demolition, boarding, clean-up or other nuisance abate-ment actions taken by the City. Bulk-Holder Enforcement Program. While conducting our analysis of ownership types we observed that there are many cases where a business, bank or private individual investor owned multiple properties in the City of East Cleveland. The City of Cleveland has adopted a bulk-holder enforcement program to address this. Rather than initiate code enforcement actions on one property at a time, enforcement can be pur-sued against multiple properties owned by one owner. This is not only more efficient, but gives the munici-pality greater leverage for enforcement. Code Enforcement Partnership Program. The City of East Cleveland is not alone in confronting the prob-lem of addressing many blighted structures with too few resources. The City of Cleveland has created a “Code Enforcement Partnership Program” which leverages the “on-the ground” resource of the city’s com-munity development corporations. These community-based organizations serve as extra “eyes and ears” helping to efficiently guide limited code enforcement resources where they can have the most impact. Similarly, the City of East Cleveland could consider partnering with organizations such as NOAH (The North-east Ohio Alliance For Hope) to achieve cost effective application of its resources. Thriving Communities Institute is prepared to offer additional research and technical assistance to explore these options.

17

Conclusion East Cleveland’s viability as a “standalone” city has been the subject of considerable discussion and specula-tion. At issue is whether annexation by the City of Cleveland would be in the best interest of East Cleveland and its beleaguered residents.

These discussions have already proven to be complicated and contentious—both in East Cleveland, where proud residents bristle at the suggestion that their city cannot govern itself, and in Cleveland, where munici-pal leaders question the wisdom of annexing a city with such a high level of distress. Regardless of where these discussions lead, it is essential that blight removal must continue in East Cleveland. This is critical to the people who live in its neighborhoods and suffer with those conditions on a daily basis—and to all the residents of Cuyahoga County, who are being forced to pick up a larger share of the countywide tax burden as a result of the collapse of East Cleveland’s property tax base.29

To date, the critical blight removal in East Cleveland has been funded from a variety of sources, including NSP grants, the Moving Ohio Forward program through the Ohio Attorney General’s Office, corporate dollars of the Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation and, most recently, from monies provided by the Treasury Department through Hardest Hit Funds. As of this writing, Cuyahoga County is preparing to issue $50 million in demolition bonds to remove blighted properties in residential neighborhoods of Cuyahoga County. The bulk of these dollars will be spent in two communities: Cleveland and East Cleveland. The im-pact of this bond on East Cleveland cannot be overstated: It can remove a significant percentage of the re-maining blighted structures in East Cleveland. It will stabilize the city and create opportunities for the repur-posing of land that were unimaginable 10 years ago. East Cleveland will not “turn the corner” overnight. But the removal of the majority of blighted properties will make it much easier – and provide critical relief for the people who still call East Cleveland home. This report will help leaders at the city and county level to prioritize dollars for demolition—and the rebirth of the city that will follow.

Image 9: Survey Team

____________________ 29 “The Cost of Vacancy: Everybody Pays”, Thomas and Gillispie, 2014. See http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1096130/the-cost-of-vacancy.pdf.

18

Appendix Overview Map…………………………………………………………………………………….19 Precinct Maps……………………………………………………………………………………..20

£ ¤6

£ ¤6

£ ¤20

£ ¤322

2A 2B

2C

2D

2E

2F3A

3B

3C

3D

3E

3F

4A

4B

4C

4D

4E

4F

0.10

0.10.2

Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Prec

incts

State

High

ways

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Activ

e Rail

Lines

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\E

ast_C

levela

nd_R

esult

s_20

1406

17.m

xd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤20

£ ¤6

£ ¤6

PHILL

IPS AV

E

133ST

EDDY RD

LAKEF

RONT AVE

THORNHILL DR125 ST

HOLYOKE AVE WHEELE

R AVE

EMILY ST

128 ST

124 ST

BENT

ON C

T

HAYDENAVE

HAYDENAVE

TUSC

ORA

AVE

OSCE

OLA

AVE

PONTIA

C ST

INGO

MAR A

VE

CARL

YON

P L

1 AVE

FRANK MORGAN PL

SAYW

ELL

AVE

FORE

STGR

OVEA

VE

CAST

LEWO

OD AV

E

CHES

TERF

IELD A

VE

LOCKWOOD AVE

ROZELLE AVE

CARLYON RD

131 ST

130 ST

129 ST

FORBES

DR SPEE

DWAY

OVER

LOOK

BENDER AVE

MELBOURNE RD

2A

2B2D

2E

3E3F

0.025

00.0

250.0

5 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 2

A

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

£ ¤20

£ ¤6

IKE TH

OMPS

ON

FORESTHILLAVE

SUPE

RIOR

RD

EMILYST

ROSA PARKS DR

125 ST

BENDER AVE

LAKEV

IEW RDMELBOURNE RD

PENROSE

AVE

AUBURNDALE AV

E

BEUL

AH AV

E

123 ST

ASHB

URY

AVE

WOODLAWN AV

E

WADEPARKAVE

GARFIELD

RD

ROSALIN

D AVE

IDLEWOOD AV

E

ALVASO

N RDFA

RMINGTON RD

ROXBURY RD

WADENA ST

BRIGHTWOOD AV

E

HOWER AV

E

LOCKWOOD AV

E

DELMONT A

VE

ELBER

ON AVE

124 ST

CARLYON RD

2A

2B

2C

2D

2E

0.025

00.0

250.0

5 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 2

B

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

£ ¤20

£ ¤322

EDDINGTON RD

GLENMONTRD

LUXORRD

FORESTHILLAVE

LAMBERT ST

SUPE

RIOR

RDFORE

STHI

LLSB

LVD

UNNA

MED

ST

AVON

DALE

AVE

MIDDLEHURST RD

MONT

AVE

WADENA ST

TERRACE RD

ROXBURY RD

GARFIELD

RD

FARMINGTO

N RD

ALVASON RD

ROSALIN

D AVE

IDLEWOOD AV

E

COVENTRY RD

HILLCREST RD

EMILYST

UNNAMED ST

2B

2B

2C

2D

2E

2F

3C

0.04

00.0

40.0

8 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 2

C

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤20

£ ¤6

£ ¤6

FORESTHILLAVE

LAMBERT ST

SUPE

RIOR RD

LAKEV

IEW RD

WOODLAWN AV

EPENROSE

AVE

MT UNION AV

E

AUBUR

NDALE

AVE

TERRACE RD

HOWER AV

E

GARFIELD

RD

BENDER AVE

DELMONT A

VE

ROSALIN

D AVE

IDLEWOOD AV

EALVA

SON RD

FARMINGTO

N RD

ELBER

ON AVE

ROXBURY RD

WADENA ST

BRIGHTWOOD AV

E

LOCKWOOD AV

ECARLYO

N RD

ROZELLE AVE

EMILY ST

HAYDENAVE

MELBOURNE RD 2A

2B

2C

2D

2E

2F

0.03

00.0

30.0

6 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 2

D

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤20

£ ¤6

£ ¤6

EDDY

RD

129 ST

FORE

STHIL

LSBL

VD

PHILL

IPS AV

E

TERRACE RD

LAKEF

RONT AVE

HAYDENAVEWHEELE

R AVE

EMILY ST

HAYDENAVE

EMILY EXT

PONTIA

C ST

BELMORE R

D

BRYN MAWR RD

HOLYOKE A

VE

DEBRA ANN LN

VASS

AR ST

WELLE

SLEY

AVE

MT UNION AV

E

HARTSHORN RDEL

SINORE AV

E

LOCKWOOD AVE

THORNHILL DR

131 ST

130 ST

SUPE

RIOR

RD

133 ST

ROZELLE AVE

FERNWOOD AVE

SPEE

DWAY

OVER

LOOK

BENDER AVE

2A

2B

2D

2E

2F

3A

3E

3F

0.025

00.0

250.0

5 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 2

EPr

ecinc

ts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤20

£ ¤6

SUPE

RIOR R

D

TERRACERD

GLENMONTRD

LUXORRD

FORESTHILLAVELAMBERT ST

EDDY R

D

WHEELER AVE

AVON

DALE

AVE

EMILY ST

MONT

AVE

VASS

AR ST

KNOWLES S

T

MT UNION AV

E

LEE BLVD

HARTSHORN RD

ALVASO

N RD

FORE

STHI

LLS B

LVD

LAKEF

RONT AVE

GARFIELD

RD

IDLEWOOD AV

E

WINDERMER

E ST

ROSALIN

D AVE

BELMORE RD

BELMARRD

EDDINGTONRD

COVENTRY RD

HILLCREST RD

FERNWOOD AVE

2B

2C

2D

2E

2F

3A

3C

3E

0.04

00.0

40.0

8 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 2

FPr

ecinc

ts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

TERRACERD

EASTHAM AVE

ELDERWOOD AVE

LAKEF

RONT AVE

VASS

AR STWEL

LESL

EY AV

E

VAN BUREN

RD

MARLOES

AVE

DOAN AVE

HOLYOKE A

VE

DEBRA ANN LN

PAGE A

VE

LEE BLVD

ELSIN

ORE AVE

WYMORE AVE

KNOWLES S

T

WINDERMERE S

T

BELMORE R

D

BEERSF

ORD RD

ROSEMONT RD

ROXFORD RD

2E

2F

3A

3B

3C

3E

4D

0.025

00.0

250.0

5 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 3

A

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

MANHATTAN AVE

STRATHMOREAVE

TERRACERD

LAKEF

RONT AVE

EDDY RD

BARD

WELL

AVE

6 AVE

EASTHAM AVE

PONTIA

C ST

HART

FORD

RD

CLAI

BORN

E RD

CLAIBORNE HARTFORD CONN

ELDERWOODAVE

ORIN

OCO

AVE

MAYF

AIR

AVE

HOLYOKE AV

E

DOAN AVEVA

N BURENRD

MARLOES

AVE

CHAPMAN AV

E

1 AVE

LEE BLVD

SCIO

TOAV

E

DEBRA ANN LNKNOWLE

S ST

PAGE A

VE

BRYN MAWR RD

2 AVE

WYMORE AVE

3 AVE

MILA

N AVE

4 AVE

SAVA

NNAH

AVE

GRAH

AM R

D

GARD

EN R

D

5 AVE

BEERSF

ORD RD

ELSIN

ORE AVE

ROSEMONT RD

ALLEGHENY AVE

ROXFORD RD

133 ST 133 ST

HAYDEN AVE

131 ST

NORT

HFIE

LD AV

E

2A2E

3A

3B

3C

3D

3E

3F

4D

0.03

00.0

30.0

6 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 3

B

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6GL

YNN

RD

FORESTHILLAVE

LAMBERTST

TAYLOR RD

ELDERWOODAVE

EDDY R

D

TERRACE RD

BRUNSWICK RD

SUPERIOR RD

MANHATTANAVE

CHELSEADR

BARDW

ELL

AVE

WALDEN RD

EASTHAM AVE

NEWBURY DR

NORTH

VALEBLVD

3 AVE

BREW

STER

RD

LEE BLVD

BURL

INGT

ONRD

MAYF

AIR

AVE

4 AVE

GARD

EN RD

DOAN AVE

6 AVE

5 AVE

HENL

EYRD

OAKH

ILLRD

VASS

AR ST

MT UNION AVE

VANBUREN

RDMARLO

ES AV

E

FENE

MORE

RD

SCIO

TO AV

E

EAST

WICK

DR

DEBRA ANN LN

HARTSHORN RD

KEW

RD

BRYN

MAWR RD

WYAT

T RD

LAKEF

RONT AVE

GRASM

ERE A

VE

WYMORE AVE

PAGE A

VE

CHAP

MAN AV

E

HOLYOKE A

VE

KNOWLES S

TWINDER

MERE S

TBEL

MORE RD

BEERSF

ORD RD

HAZE

L RD

PRIVATEDR

ELSIN

ORE AVE

ROSEMONT RD

FORE

STHIL

LSBL

VD

HAYDEN AVE

ROXFORDRD

STAN

WOOD RD

CLEV

IDENRD

2C

2D

2E

2F

3A

3B

3C

3E

3F4C

4D

0.055

00.0

550.1

1 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 3

C

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

ELDERWOODAVE

STRA

THMO

RE AV

E

SHAW

AVE

142 ST

GRAH

AM RD

BEAU

MONT

AVE

141 ST

MANHATTAN AVE

ELM

AVE

SCIO

TOAV

ECHAPM

AN AVE

POTO

MAC

AVE

ORIN

OCO

AVE

ELWOOD RD

ARDE

NALL

AVE

143 ST

HAYDEN AVEHAYDEN AVE

HAMPTON RD

ALLEGHENY AVE

NORT

HFIE

LD AV

E

139 ST

SHAWVIEWAVE3B

3D

3E

3F

4A

4C

4C

4D

4F

0.025

00.0

250.0

5 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 3

D

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

SHAW

AVE

LAKEF

RONT AVE

GLYNN

RD

STRA

THMO

RE AV

E

HAYDENAVE

TERRACE RD

6 AVE

BARD

WELL

AVE

EASTHAM AVE

HART

FORD

RD

MANHATTAN AVE

CLAI

BORN

E RD

CLAIBORNE HARTFORD CONN

EDDY

RD

ELDERWOODAVE

PONTIA

C ST

RICHMOND PL

LEE BLVD

MAYF

AIR

AVE

HOLYOKE A

VE

WELTONDR

DOAN AVE

PLYMOUTH PL

VAN BUREN

RD

MARLOES

AVE

1 AVE

SCIO

TOAV

E

PRIVATEDR

DEBRA ANN LN

BRYN MAWR RD

135 ST

134 ST

2 AVE3 A

VE

MILA

N AVE

WINDERMERE ST

4 AVE

STAN

WOOD RD

GRAH

AM R

D

GARD

EN R

D

5 AVE

GRASM

ERE A

VE

WYMORE AVE

PAGE A

VECHAP

MAN AV

E

ARDE

NALL

AVE

KNOWLES STBEE

RSFORD RD

ELSIN

ORE AVE

ROSEMONT RD

ROXFORDRD

ALLEGHENY AVE

133 ST

NORT

HFIE

LD AV

E

131ST2A

2E

2F

3A

3B

3C

3D

3E

3F4C

4D

4F

0.04

00.0

40.0

8 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 3

EPr

ecinc

ts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6141ST

SHAW

AVE

BRAC

KLAN

D AV

E

EDMO

NTON

AVE

EDDY RD

ARLIN

GTON

AVE

LAKE

FRON

T AVE

BARD

WELL

AVE

6 AVE

EASTHAM AVE

TH

ORNHILL DR

HART

FORD

RD

MARLOES

AVE

CLAI

BORN

E RD

MANHATTAN AVE

CAR L

YON P

L

CLAIBORNE HARTFORD CONN

HOLYOKE AV

E

BARR

INGT

ONAV

E

133 ST

129 STAU

STIN

AVE

MAYF

AIR

AVE DOAN AVE

CARLYON RD

1 AVE

SCIO

TOAV

E

143 ST

IRVIN

GTON

AVE

ELWOOD RD

BRYN MAWR RD

2 AVE

127 ST

HAMPTON RD

ARDE

NALL

AVE

STRA

THMO

RE AV

E

126 ST

ORIN

OCO

AVE

ELSIN

ORE AVE

IROQ

UOIS

AVE

3 AVE

MILA

N AVE

4 AVE

GRAH

AM R

D

GARD

EN R

D

5 AVE

HAYDEN AVE

128 ST

128 ST

NORT

HFIE

LD AV

E

ALLEGHENY AVE

133 ST133 ST

130 ST

PAXTON RD

131 ST

125 ST

139 ST

135 ST

130 ST

134 ST

2A2E

3A

3B

3D

3E

3F

4A4F

0.04

00.0

40.0

8 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 3

FPr

ecinc

ts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

WOOD

WORT

H RD

SHAW

AVE

ELM

AVE

ALDE

R AVE

MANN

AVE

143 ST

STCL

AIRAV

E

142 ST

133 ST

BEAU

MONT

AVE

BALD

WIN

AVE

GAIN

SBOR

O AV

E

137 ST

HAYDEN AVE

134 ST

141 ST

135 ST

133 ST

139 ST

134 ST

135 ST

3D3F

4A

4F

0.02

00.0

20.0

4 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 4

A

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

HILLSB

ORORD

NOBL

E RD

CALEDONIAAVE

TERRACERD

COLONNADE RD

NELAVIEWRD

ENDORARD

ALCOY RD

COIT AVE

IVANHOE RD

BELV

OIR B

LVD

LAMPSON RD

MANNERING RD

HILLSID

E AVE

NOB L

ERD

HELMSDALERD

ELDERWOOD AVE

NELA

CT

N ELA

WOO

DRD

NELA A

VE

RICHMOND PL

WESTBURN AVE

SE

LWYN RD

NELADALERD

NELAMERERD

GRANTHAM RD

URBANA RD

ROSEDALEAV

E

COLLAMER AVE

VICTORIA RD

HALDANE RD

ALTO

N RD

ALLANDALE AVE

HASTINGS A

VE

SHELDON AVE

BURNETTE AVE

CHARLES RD

OCTAVIA RD

WOODVIEW RD

ELOISE DR

GREYTONRD

REYBURN RD

RAVINE DR

HANO

VER

DR

UNNAM

EDST

HILTON RD

TAYL

ORRD

NELACRESTRD

3E

4B

4C

4D4D

4E

4F

0.045

00.0

450.0

9 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 4

B

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

STRAT

HMORE AVE

SHAW

AVEELM

AVE

COIT AVE

BRUN

SWICK

RD

152 ST

NOBLE RD

TERRACE RD

SCIOT

O AVE

MANHATTAN AVE

ELDERWOODAVE

NORTHFIE

LD AV

E

ELDERWOOD AVE

RICHMOND PL

COLLAMER AVE

WELTON DR

POTO

MAC

AVE

PLYMOUTH PL

ROSEDALE

AVE

PAGE A

VE

SAVA

NNAH

AVE

ALDE

R AVE

ORIN

OCO

AVE

CHAP

MAN AV

E

STAN

WOOD RD

ALLANDALE AVE

HASTINGS A

VE

SHELDON AVE

BURNETTE AVE

CHARLES RD

ARDE

NALL

AVE

ELWOOD RD

GRASM

ERE A

VE

TAYL

OR RD

HAMPTON RD

WYMORE A

VE

HANOV

ERDR

SHAWVIEWAVE

3B

3D

3E

4B

4C

4D

4E

4F

0.035

00.0

350.0

7 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 4

C

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

GLYN

N RD

STRAT

HMORE AVE

TERRACERD

NORTHFIE

LD AV

E

MT VERNON BLVD

TAYLOR RDBR

UNSWICK RD

ELDERWOOD AVE

MANHATTAN AVE

LEE BLVD

HENLEYRDBR

EWST

ER R

D

BAYREUTH RD

WELTON DR

OAK HI LL

RD

DRES

DEN RD

MARLOES AV

E

ARDE

NALL

AVE

GRANDVIEW TER

STAN

WOOD RD

SHELDON AVECHARLES RD

GRASM

ERE A

VE

WYMORE AVE

PAGE A

VECHAP

MAN AV

E

HAZE

L RD

PRIVATEDR

ROSEMONT RD

HANO

VER

DR

3A

3B

3C

3D

3E

4C

4D

4E

0.035

00.0

350.0

7 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 4

D

Prec

incts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

NOBL

E RD

HELMSDALERD

NELAVIEWRD

TERRACERD

GREYTONRD

CALEDONIA AVE

TAYLOR RD

NELA

CT

BRUNSWICK RD

NOBL

E RD

WINS

FORD

RD

NELA

WOO

D RD

NELA A

VE

BAYREUTH RD

DEAN

WOOD S

T

NELADALE RD

CHARLES RD

COLLAMER AVE

NELAMERERD

ROSEDALEAV

E

WHITBYRD

ALLANDALE AVE

HASTINGS A

VEBURNETTE AVE

DRESDEN RD

BELV

OIR

BLVD

HANO

VER

DRELOISE DRRAVINE DR

NELACRESTRD

4B

4C

4D

4E

0.035

00.0

350.0

7 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 4

EPr

ecinc

ts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot

£ ¤6

VELO

URAV

E

STRA

THMO

RE AV

E

WOOD

WORT

H RD

SHAW

AVE

MANHATTAN AVE

NOBL

ERD

ELM

AVE

152 ST

COIT AVE

DOVE

RAV

E

142 ST

ALLEGHENY AVE

BALD

WIN

AVE

ALDE

R AVE

BEAU

MONT

AVE

ELDERWOOD AVE

143 ST

DOVER CT

RICHMOND PL

HASTINGS A

VE

ROSEDALE AVE

WELTON DR

SHELDON AVE

PLYMOUTH PL

144 ST

ELDER

WOODAVE

GLEN

SIDE

RD

ALLANDALE

AVE

ORIN

OCO

AVE

ARDE

NALL

AVE

CHARL

ES

RDCOLLAMER AVE

WEMPLE RD

CAST

ALIA

AVE

ELWOOD RD

COIT RD

HAMPTON RD

145 ST

141 ST

146 ST

TAYL

OR RD

SHAWVIEWAVE

3B

3D3E

4A4B

4C

4E

4F

0.03

00.0

30.0

6 Miles

East

Clev

eland

Prop

erty

Inven

tory

Resu

lts:

Prec

inct 4

FPr

ecinc

ts

Road

s -Cu

yaho

ga C

o.

Map C

reated

7/14

/2014

pb

Wes

tern

Res

erve

La

nd

Co

nse

rvan

cyO

UR

LA

ND

. O

UR

LE

GA

CY

N S

WE

Path:

X:\TC

I_Proj

ects\

Vaca

nt_Pr

opert

y_Inv

entor

ies\Ea

st_Cle

velan

d\Res

ults\M

ap_B

ooks

\East_

Cleve

land_

Prec

incts_

Mapb

ook_

2014

0617

.mxd

Occu

pied S

tructu

res

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Secu

re)

A F

Vaca

nt S

tructu

res (

Open

)A F

Surve

y Res

ults

Park

Parki

ng Lo

tVa

cant

Lot