www.scottishpowerrenewables.com

East Anglia THREE

Other Environmental Information Appendix 4

Document Reference – OEI/Covering Document/ Appendix 4

East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm

Statement of Common Ground East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm [xxxx]

[XMonthX 2016] Page 2

Contents

Response

1.1 EIFCA 1.2 Felixstowe Town Council 1.3 Marine Management Organisation (MMO) 1.4 Public Health England (PHE) 1.5 Natural England 1.6 Trinity House 1.7 Historic England 1.8 Suffolk Preservation Society (SPS) 1.9 Local Planning Authorities 1.10 Suffolk Police & Crime Commissioner 1.11 Suffolk Constabulary Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.12 Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark

Hyde, Natasha

Subject: FW: Other Environmental Information consultation response from Eastern IFCA

From: Judith Stoutt [mailto:judithstoutt@eastern-ifca.gov.uk]Sent: 09 August 2016 14:20To: East Anglia ThreeCc: Stephen Thompson; Alan GarnhamSubject: Other Environmental Information consultation response from Eastern IFCA

BY EMAIL ONLY

Dear Mr Morrison,

Thank you for sending me a copy of the Other Environmental Information for the East Anglia Three Offshore Wind

Farm.

Eastern Inshore Fisheries &Conservation Authority (Eastern IFCA) has no comment to make on the updated

Seascape, Landscape and Visual Amenity Impact Assessment, nor on the update to the Traffic Impact Assessment.

We have reviewed the assessment of the Project's likely effects on the Orford Inshore recommended Marine

Conservation Zone (rMCZ). This site is outside of, but close to, the Eastern IFCA district, so we wanted to ensure that

if any effects were predicted for the rMCZ, consideration could be made of any indirect effects in the Eastern IFCA

district. We note that the assessment concludes there will be no pathway for the East Anglia Three project to impact

on the proposed features of the rMCZ, and therefore predict no adverse effect on the site. However, we also note

that the assessment predicts that sediment deposits of up to 2mm could occur within a few hundred metres of

inshore sections of cable (paragraph 13), and that the cable will be laid 300m from the rMCZ boundary. We

therefore ask whether there is any potential for the ecological functioning of the subtidal mixed sediment habitat

within the rMCZ to be affected by this low level of deposition of sediment resulting from cable-laying operations. In

particular, we question whether the use of the site by sandeel, Dover sole or lemon sole for spawning could be

affected. We would highlight the East Marine Plans Policy Fish 2, which relates to the prevention of, or mitigation

for, impacts on spawning and nursery areas and any associated habitat. It is possible that inshore fisheries could be

affected if spawning grounds for these species are negatively impacted.

Yours sincerely,

Judith Stoutt

Senior Marine Environment Officer

Eastern Inshore Fisheries &Conservation Authority

T: (01553) 775321

www.eastern-ifca.~ov.uk

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

IF you have reoeiv~d this message in error, please notify the sender and immediately

delete this message and any attachment hereto and/or copy hereof, as such messagecontains conFidential inf_ormatiori intended solely for the individual or entity to whomit is addressed. The use or disclosure of such information to third parties isprohibited by law and may give rise to civil or criminal liability.

The views presented in this message are solely those of the author (s) and do notnecessarily represent the opinion of Scottish Fower, Ltd. or any company of its group.Neither Scottish Power Ltd. nor any company of its group guarantees the integrity,security or proper receipt of this message. Likewise, neither Scofitish Po«er Ltd. norany company of its group accepts any liability whatsoever for any possible damagesarising from, or in connection ~rit_h, data interception, software viruses ormanipulation by third parties.

2

Hyde, Natasha

Subject: FW: East Anglia Three Limited -Other Environmental Information for the East Anglia

Three Offshore Wind Farm

From: Rosemary Jones [mailto:rosemary,Jones@felixstowe.gov.uk]Sent: 10 August 2016 14:36To: East Anglia ThreeCc: Town ClerkSubject: East Anglia Three Limited -Other Environmental Information for the East Anglia Three Offshore Wind Farm

Dear Mr Morrison,

Thank you for the your letter advising Felixstowe Town Council of the consultation on the OEI in relation to the

above development.

The Town Council's Panning and Environment Committee considered the documents at its meeting today 10tH

August and resolved to make ̀ No Comment'.

Yours sincerely,

Rosemary Jones

Estates Officer

Felixstowe Town Council

Pp Ash Tadjrishi , Clerk to Felixstowe Town Council.

Please consider_ the environment before printing this email.

If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and immediatelydelete this message and any attachment hereto and/or copy hereof, as such messagecontains confidential information intended solely for the individual or entity to ~~homit is addressed. The use or disclosure of such information to third parties isprohibited by law and may give rise to civil or criminal liability.

The views presented in this message are solely those of the author (s) and do notnecessarily represent the opinion of Scottish Power, Ltd. or any company of its group.Neither Scottish Power_ Ltd. no.r any company of its group guarantees the integrity,security or proper recei.nt of this message. Likewise, neither Scottish Power Ltd. norany company of its group accepr_s any liability whatsoever for any possible damagesarising from, or in connection with, data interception, software viruses ormanipulation by third par_~ies.

Marine Development Marine Licensing Team Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH

T +44 (0)300 123 1032 www.gov.uk/mmo

Mr Keith Morrison East Anglia THREE Ltd (email only)

Our reference: DCO/2013/00014

19 August 2016 Dear Mr Morrison Marine Management Organisation (MMO) Response to East Anglia THREE Offshore Wind Farm ‘Other Environmental Information’ I am writing in response to the East Anglia THREE Offshore Wind Farm ‘Other Environmental Information’ received by the MMO on 29 July 2016. The MMO is an interested party for the examination of Development Consent Order (DCO) applications for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) in the English marine area. The MMO has reviewed the information provided and has no comments to make in respect of the marine elements of the Other Environmental Information. The MMO defers to Natural England, as the statutory nature conservation body, with regards to the Orford Inshore recommended Marine Conservation Zone (rMCZ) Assessment. Furthermore, it is the responsibility of each public authority to consider the potential affects in MCZs when determining an application; we consider for the East Anglia THREE application this is the Secretary of State. If you have any queries regarding the content of this letter please contact the undersigned.

Yours sincerely

Kathleen Mongan Marine Licensing Case Officer T: 020802 65326 E: kathleen.mongan@marinemanagement.org.uk

CRCE/NSIP Consultations

Chilton

Didcot

Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ

T +44 (0) 1235 825278

F +44 (0) 1235 822614

www.gov.uk/phe

Keith Morrison Scottish Power Renewables FREEPOST RSTC-EJEY-RKRXOW 1 Atlantic Quay, 45 Robertson Street, Glasgow,

G2 8JB. 22nd August 2016 Dear Mr Morrison, Re: East Anglia Three Offshore Wind Farm - Other Environmental Information Thank you for your correspondence of 27 July 2016, noting the production of Other Environmental Information (OEI) to supplement the Environmental Statement for this project. Public Health England (PHE) has not previously registered an interest in this project. Following consideration of the additional information we do not wish to raise any issues and our position remains the same. Yours sincerely,

nsipconsultations@phe.gov.uk Please mark any correspondence for the attention of National Infrastructure Planning Administration.

Your Ref:

Our Ref: ST/21852

Page 1 of 2

Date: 29 August 2016 Our ref: East Anglia THREE Your ref: OEI Consultation

East Anglia THREE Limited 3rd Floor 1 Tudor Street London EC4Y 0AH BY EMAIL ONLY

RE: East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Examination - Other Environmental Information (OEI) The following comprises Natural England’s submission on the OEI submitted by East Anglia THREE Limited (the Applicant) to supplement their Environmental Statement, the following advice is provided under our Discretionary Advice Service: Natural England acknowledges the submission of the OEI by the Applicant to supplement their Environmental Statement. Orford Inshore rMCZ Assessment Natural England were consulted during the drafting of this document and as such are in agreement with its format and conclusions. As the official consultation on this rMCZ is likely to take place in the second half of 2017, there is unlikely to be any change in the status of the rMCZ during the East Anglia THREE examination. Henley Road Assessment Natural England has no comment on the Henley Road Assessment as provided in the OEI. Revised Land and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) We do not have any concerns regarding landscape issues resulting from the revised LVIA. For any queries relating to the specific advice in this letter only please contact Alex Thompson at alex.thompson@naturalengland.org.uk. Yours sincerely

Alex Thompson Marine Lead Advisor – Major Casework

Page 2 of 2

East Midlands Area Team

Hyde, Natasha

Subject: FW: East Anglia Three OWF -Other Environmental Information

From: Stephen Vanstone [mailto:Stephen.VanstoneCa~thls.org]Sent: 24 August 2016 11:12To: East Anglia ThreeCc: Nick DodsonSubject: East Anglia Three OWF -Other Environmental Information

Good morning Keith,

Many thanks for your letter dated 27 July 2016.

P►ease be advised that Trinity House has noted this information and has no further comments at this stage.

Kind regards,

Steve VanstoneNavigation Services Officer

This communication, together tivith any files or attachments transmitted with it contains information which is confidential and may be subject to legal privilegeand is intended solely for the use by the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, distribute, publish or take any action in

reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error: please notify postmaster(c~thls.orq and delete it from your computer systems. Trinity House

resen~es the right to monitor all communications for lawful purposes. Receipt of this email does not imply consent to use or provide this email address. or any

others contained therein, to any third party for any purposes. The contents of [his email are protected under international copyright law. This email originatedfrom the Corporation of Trinit~f House of Deptford ~trond which is incorporated by Royal Charter in England and Wales. The Royal Charter number is RC000622. The Registered office is Trinity House, Tower Hiii, London, F_C3~1 4DH.

To save energy and paper please ,orint this email only if you really need to.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

If you have received this message in error, please notify 'the sender and immediately

delete this message and any attachment hereto and/or copy hereof, as such message

contains confidential information intended solely for the individual or entity to whom

it is addressed. The use or disclosure of such information. to third parties is

prohibited by law and may give rise to civil or criminal liability.

The views presented in this message are solely those of the author (s) and do not

necessar.:ily :represent the opinion of Scottish Po~~er, Ltd. or any company of its group.

Neither Scottish Power Ltd. nor any company of its group guarantees the integrity,

security or proper receipt of this message. Likewise, neither Scottish Power Ltd. nor

any company of its group accepts any liability whatsoever for any possible damages

arising from, or in connection with, data interception, software viruses or

manipulation by third parties.

i

Historic England, Eastgate Court, 195-205 High Street, Guildford GU1 3EH

Telephone 01483 25 2020 HistoricEngland.org.uk

Please note that Historic England operates an access to information policy.

Correspondence or information which you send us may therefore become publicly available.

Mr Keith Morrison

East Anglia Three Ltd.

1 Atlantic Quay

45 Robertson Street

Glasgow

G2 8JB

Our ref:

Your ref:

Telephone:

OWF/UKCS/EAThree

07798 653897

24th August 2016

Dear Mr Morrison,

East Anglia THREE Limited – Other Environmental Information

Thank you for the letter and DVD, dated 27th July 2016, directed to me at our Cambridge

office. Please note that I am not based at the Cambridge office and that all subsequent

correspondence is to be directed to my colleague Stuart Churchley (at the office address

given in this letter).

We understand that you have directed for our attention Other Environmental Information

(OEI) that supplements the Environmental Statement submitted with the Application for

consent (under the Planning Act 2008). From the information presented to us, we

acknowledge that the OEI addresses the following matters:

• Volume 1 – Introduction;

• Volume 2 – Orford Inshore rMCZ Assessment (Document reference : OEI / Volume 2/

rMCZ assessment);

• Volume 3 Henley Road Assessment (Document reference: OEI / Volume 3 / Henley

Road assessment); and

• Volume 4 – Revised LVIA Assessment (OEI/ Volume 4 / LVIA assessment).

We hereby offer the following response:

1. Volume 2 – we have no comment or other advice to offer as primary responsibility for advice regarding such matters rests with the Statutory Nature Conservation

Body (Natural England) and other such parties that have regulatory functions as

relevant to nature conservation.

Historic England, Eastgate Court, 195-205 High Street, Guildford GU1 3EH

Telephone 01483 25 2020 HistoricEngland.org.uk

Please note that Historic England operates an access to information policy.

Correspondence or information which you send us may therefore become publicly available.

2. Volume 3 – We note that this volume was prepared on behalf of East Anglia THREE Ltd. in response to concerns raised by Suffolk County Council (SCC) regarding

routing of construction HGV traffic through Lower Road, Westerfield for the

proposed East Anglia THREE project. The matter identified here is exclusively

terrestrial and not specifically related to the management of the historic

environment for which we are responsible and we therefore defer any comment to

SCC.

3. Volume 4 – We note that this assessment is an update to the East Anglia THREE Environmental Statement (2015) showing the updated East Anglia ONE substation

dimensions contained in the East Anglia ONE Offshore Wind Farm (Corrections and

Amendments) Order 2016, and the updated visual mitigation design contained in

the East Anglia ONE Landscape Masterplan and Management Plan, including

additional woodland planting proposed along the western side of Gobert’s Grove

(to mitigate the potential loss of screening by the existing woodland). It is

apparently from the information presented to us that the matters addressed in this

volume are not specifically connected with the historic environment for which

Historic England has responsibility. We therefore defer any comment to the

relevant local authorities (e.g. Suffolk County Council, Mid Suffolk District Council

and Suffolk Coastal District Council) or other relevant parties.

Yours sincerely,

Christopher Pater

Head of Marine Planning

Cc Will Fletcher (Inspector of Ancient Monuments – Historic England, East of England)

Stuart Churchley (Marine Planning Archaeological Advisor – Historic England)

Alan Gibson (Marine Management Organisation)

23 August 2016 Mr R Campbell Scottish Power Renewables FREEPOST RSTC-EJEY-RKRXOW 1, Atlantic Quay 45 Robertson Street Glasgow G2 8JB Dear Mr Campbell Re: Other Environmental Information for East Anglia THREE Offshore Wind Farm Further to your letter dated 27th July, we have considered the Other Environmental Information and would like to comment on the revised update document and also take this opportunity to comment further on the methodology used to assess the impact of the proposal on heritage assets. Other Environmental Information reference OEI/Volume4/LVIA assessment/Chapter 29 Firstly, we are disappointed that the LVIA continues to underestimate the likely visual effects of the Converter station. The LVIA indicates that significant effects will only be felt for the first 15 years. However, The Society considers that a building which is 24m tall will result in significant effects for at least twenty years before the proposed mitigation will be effective. This is supported by your own statements in 29.7.2.2.1 which states that even where the bunding is provided the trees at year 15 will only be 12m in height and only up to 16m by year 25, the planned end of the project life. Therefore significant effects, particularly from the more prominent ridgeline, will continue to be experienced throughout the project’s lifetime. Secondly, we are concerned that the LVIA overplays the visual impacts of East Anglia One to justify the cumulative impact of East Anglia THREE. The cumulative impacts resulting from multiple sub/converter stations in this location will arguably result in greater sensitivity to significant effects not less. In summary, East Anglia One at 12m in height and more diffuse is not comparable to East Anglia THREE which will consist of a dominant block measuring 116m by 85m and 24m in height, together with other external structures. Heritage Assessment Methodology Further to the Statement of Common Ground, the Society would like to comment further regarding the assessment of impacts upon the historic built environment. The methodology used to assess the impacts on heritage is summarised in Para.54 of Chapter 25 of the environmental statement which states that:

2

Visual impact was assessed by comparing the ZTV to the actual views available of the landscape surrounding the substation(s) location. Heritage assets which could not be demonstrated to share intervisibility were then scoped out of any further assessment, while those identified as potential sensitive receptors were put forward for further detailed assessment. These were assessed in terms of their intrinsic significance and contribution made to that significance by potential impacts upon their setting arising from the proposed project. This approach is not in accordance with best practice as set out in Historic England guidance, The Setting of Heritage Assets, Historic Environment Good Practice Advice in Planning 3, which states that the concept of setting of a heritage asset is a complex one and is not solely defined simply by intervisibility. Significantly, the guidance makes clear that setting does not have a fixed boundary and cannot be definitively and permanently described for all time as a spatially bounded area or as lying within a set distance of the heritage asset. Furthermore within your email response dated 10th August to our query regarding the omission of numerous designated heritage assets which lie within 4 km of the site from the baseline map figure 25.3, your consultant states that: Of the identified assets only the Grade II Listed Fidgeon’s Farmhouse (LB1293253) was identified to have any significant views incorporating the substation location. Development here was considered to comprise a change within the largely agricultural setting of the asset but not to affect its main aspect. We are concerned that this approach to assessing impacts upon heritage assets is simplistic and fails to take into account the importance of setting upon the significance of the numerous designated heritage assets which encircle the development site. Screening out all the listed buildings that do not share direct intervisibility with the site fails to pay regard to the contribution that the rural and agricultural character of the landscape makes to the significance of the setting of numerous listed farms and barns which populate this area. Furthermore, even where intervisibility has been demonstrated, your assessment only considers the main aspect of the assets i.e. its front elevation and not its full setting. The methodology relies upon views from the site to the asset (appendix 25.2, page 57, para. 25.2.4) which we would argue is significantly different from seeing a 24m high structure from within the setting of the asset. Due to our lack of confidence around the methodology and the actual effects the overall Converter Complex will have upon the historic built environment, the Society strongly recommend that a fund for offsite mitigation of heritage assets is provided in the form of a S/106 agreement between the developer and the local planning authority. A precedent has been set under East Anglia One for off-site mitigation for hedge planting to mitigate views from the public highway. However, we note that the terms of this agreement are strictly defined and not specifically available for mitigation of harmful impacts on heritage assets. Therefore, we strongly recommend a legal agreement with Mid Suffolk District Council for the express purpose of offsite planting to mitigate the harmful effects upon heritage assets and their setting. Yours sincerely,

3

Fiona Cairns IHBC MRTPI Director Cc: Phil Butler - SPS Mid Suffolk District District Councillor Phil Watson, Landscape Officer Suffolk County Council Jonathon Duck, Conservation Officer, Mid Suffolk District Council David Eve, Historic England David Burn, Portfolio Holder Environment, Mid Suffolk District Council

Hyde, Natasha

Subject: FW: Comments on revised LVIA -for your informaton

From: Phil Watson [mailto:phil.watson@suffolk.gov.uk]Sent: 24 August 2016 15:57To: Campbell, RickCc: Nicholas Newton; Ben Elvin; Lisa Chandler; Philip.PerkinCa>eastsuffolk.gov.uk; John Pitchford; Katherine PottsSubject: Comments on revised LVIA -for your informaton

Dear Rick,

Comments on the revised and updated LVIA

Nick Newton and I offer the following comments on the revised LVIA which you passed tous for review prior to submission of the of the OEI package;

Errata

Para 61 Table 29.3 `early' installation of tree/hedge protective fencing —needs to be thefirst thing, installed after any tree or hedge works, and before any other operation.

Page 61 Impacts on Physical Features. For hedges this is described as very short term (0-1year) across the board, but where they have been removed the impact must be short termthat is 1-5 years) until the replanting has established and has a degree of maturity. Samein Table 29.10 page 69/70.

Paras 129-131 Only refers clearly Mid Suffolk SLAs (Policy CL2) and not SCDC; PolicyCL13 is the policy that identifies Special Landscape Areas in Suffolk Coastal; although they are

shown on Figure 29.2*

* SLAs are landscapes that are designated for their local importance. (Sa+~ed Policy CL2 MSDG and PolicyAP93 ,~CD~) Saved Policy CL2from the Mid Suffolk Local Plan (1998) states ̀ Within Special Landscape Areas, particular care will betaken to safeguard landscape quality, and where developmentdoes occur it should be sensitively designed, with high standards of layout, material and landscaping.' Withspecific reference to utility installations and power lines, there isan expectation that these should be routed away from SLAs to avoid visual intrusion. Suffolk CoastalDistrict Policy AP21, also states that: ̀ In the Area of OutstandingNatural Beauty and Special Landscape Areas the form of buildings, choice of materials, and colours mustbe sympathetic to the general character of the area andseek to reduce visual impact.

Comment

Significant effects and the establishment of planting at the sub-station -15 years is slightlyoptimistic; in practice 15-20 years would probably be a more reasonable worst case in terms ofthe mitigation of the majority of significant effects by the onsite planting.

As discussed, we will formally update our position in respect of the LVIA in due course.

Best regards

Phil

Philip Watson CEnv MIAgrE

Senior Landscape OfficerNatural &Historic Environment Team -Strategic DevelopmentResource ManagementSuffolk County Council8 Russell Rd Endeavour douse (S2 F5 47jIPSWICH IP1 2BX

Tel: 01473 264777Mob:07872 676856phil.watson(~suffolk.gov.ukwww.suffolk.gov.ukwww.suffolklandscape.orq.uk

Emails sent to and from this organisation will be monitored in accordancewith the law to ensure compliance with policies and to minimise anysecurity risks.The information contained in this email or any of its attachments maybe privileged or confidential and is intended for the exclusive use ofthe addressee. Any unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you receivethis email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately by usingthe reply facility in your email software.

Please consider Lhe environment before printing this email.

Tf y0U h~~„r~ iP~-ei~,ror~ th1S ??;~SSd~P 1;: .,.~r'^`" r N~~?S~ :`:Jt1~~' +l-;~ 5~;1'.~~Y' d::Cl 1P1.1"~l~Cl'12..~.:_'i~'

delete this message and any attachment hereto and/or copy hereof, as such messagecontains confidential information intended solely for the individual or. entity to whomi~ is addressed. The use or disclosure of such information to third parties isprohibited by law and may give rise to civil or criminal liability.

The views presented in this message are solely those of the author (s) and do notnecessarily represent the opinion of Scottish Po~~~er. Generation Holdings Ltd. or anycompany of its group. Neither Scottish Power Generation Holdings Ltd. nor any companyo.f_ :its group guarantees the integrity, security or proper receipt of this message.Likewise, neither Scottish Po~~rer Generation Holdings Ltd. nor any company of its groupaccepts any liability whatsoever fo:r any possible damages arising from, o:r i_nconnedion with, data intercep+-.ion, software ~Tiruses or manipula}ion by third parties.

2

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED www.suffolk-pcc.gov.uk

Tim Passmore BSc MBA Your Ref: Police and Crime Commissioner Our Ref: TP/mt/111 Police Headquarters, Martlesham Heath Telephone No. 01473 613614 Ipswich, Suffolk, IP5 3QS E: tim.passmore@suffolk.pnn.police.uk Date: 26 August 2016 By Email to EastAngliaThree@scottishpower.com Dear Mr Morrison Re:East Anglia THREE Limited Other Environmental Information for the East Anglia THREE Offshore Wind Farm I understand you have recently written to the Chief Constable as a consultee in response to the OEI for the East Anglia THREE Offshore Wind Farm. The Constabulary has examined the content of your documents to assess whether there are any operational impacts that are relevant and can confirm there are none. My Police & Crime Plan is explicit in the fact that successful business and inward investment is central to a vibrant economy and the part this plays in helping to make Suffolk a safer place in which to live, work, travel and invest. As such, any proposed scheme should maximise the employment opportunities for the residents of Suffolk. Yours sincerely

Tim Passmore Police and Crime Commissioner Mr Keith Morrison Senior Project Manager – East Anglia THREE Ltd 3rd Floor, 1 Tudor Street LONDON EC4Y 0AH

Making Suffolk a safer place to live, work, travel and invest

www.suffolk.police.uk

Police Headquarters, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich IP5 3QS Tel: 01473 613500 Fax: 01473 613737 (24 hrs)

Calls may be monitored for quality control, security and training purposes.

Our Ref: GW/kp Direct Dial: 01473 782708 26th August 2016

Dear Mr Morrison

EAST ANGLIA THREE LIMITED Other Environmental Information for the East Anglia THREE Offshore Wind Farm

Thank you for your letter dated 27th July 2016 in which you seek to consult on the above

project. I can confirm that having examined the documents you have produced there are

no operational impacts worthy of note.

Yours sincerely

Gareth Wilson Chief Constable

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED RESTRICTED/CONFIDENTIAL

Mr Keith Morrison Senior Project Manager East Anglia THREE Ltd 1 Atlantic Quay 45 Robertson Street GLASGOW G2 8JB By Email : EastAngliaThree@scottishpower.com

Hyde, Natasha

From: East Anglia Three <eastangliathree@scottishpower.com>Sent: 30 August 2016 16:12To: David TarrantSubject: FW: East Anglia Three Offshore Wind Farm.

_ _ _From: Martin Holm Jensen [mailto:mahje@svana.dk]Sent: 29 August 2016 09:08To: East Anglia ThreeSubject: East Anglia Three Offshore Wind Farm.

Dear Keith Morrison

Denmark has no remarks to the Other Environmental Information for the East Anglia Three Offshore Wind Farm.

Best regards

Martin Holm JensenCivil Servant ~ Organization and Law+45 72 54 27 03 ~ +45 93 58 80 52 ~ mahie~a~.svana.dk

Ministry of Environment and Food of DenmarkThe Danish Agency for Water and Nature Management (Haraldsgade 53 ~ DK-2100 Kobenhavn Q1 ~ Tlf. +45 72 54 20 00 ~svana svana.dk ~ www.svana.dk

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

If you have received this message in error, please not:i_fy the sender and immediatelydelete this message and any attachment hereto and/or copy hereof, as sucYl message

contains confidential information intended solely for the individual or entity to whom

it is addressed. The use or disclosure of such information to third parties is

prohibited by law and may give rise to civil or criminal liability.

The views presented in this message are solely those of the author (s) and do r.ot

necessarily represent the opinion of Scottish Power, Ltd. or any company of its group.

Neither Scottish Power Ltd. nor ary company of its group guarantees the integrity,

security or proper receipt of this message. Likewise, neither Scottish Power Ltd. nor

any company of its group accepts any liability whatsoever for any possible damages

arising from, or in connection with, data interception, software viruses or

manipulation by third parties.