Early Universe Gamma Ray Burst Detection 2004. Scientific Rationale The first generation of stars...
-
Upload
lionel-simmons -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
3
Transcript of Early Universe Gamma Ray Burst Detection 2004. Scientific Rationale The first generation of stars...
Scientific Rationale
• The first generation of stars were very important for the conditions of the early Universe!
– Synthesis of heavy elements
– Reionization of the Universe
• In order to understand the Universe at this time, we have to understand the first generation of stars
Gamma Ray Bursts
GRBs are the brightest objects known in the Universe.
Detectable to redshifts of 20 or even more!
Gamma Ray Bursts
GRBs are the brightest objects known in the Universe.
Detectable to redshifts of 20 or even more!
Gamma Ray Bursts are unique probes of the death of these first stars !
Current Understanding
GRBs are emitted in the collapse of massive and fast spinning stars (hypernovae)
We expect the first stars to generate GRBs through a similar mechanism
Mission Objectives
• Primary objective
Detection of extremely high redshift Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) as a probe of the first generation of stars.
• Secondary objectives○ Properties of the intergalactic matter○ X-ray flashes of proto-stars○ Studies of extragalactic objects
Mission Objectives
Demands for primary objective
• Wide Field Camera (position)
• X-Ray (position, spectroscopy)
• Infrared (spectroscopy)
• Payload– Required Observations– Detectors
• Wide Field Camera• Pointing X-Ray Telescope• Near Infrared Telescope
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis– Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Attitude Control
Mission Design Overview
Prompt emission: 0.1 –100 s with energy peak ~ 150 keV
Afterglow emission in X-ray and optical
Known GRBs
• Payload– Required Observations– Detectors
High-z GRBs
• Payload– Required Observations– Detectors
Lamb & Reichart 2000
• Peak emission shifted to X-ray energies
• UV lines shifted into the infrared (specifically Ly alpha)
• Time dilatation
Prompt emission fluxes
• Payload– Required Observations– Detectors
High-z GRBs
Energy bin
1-2 2-4 4-6 6-8 (keV)
0
0.5
1
Num
ber
of p
hoto
ns /
cm
2 /
s z = 10z = 20z = 30z = 30
• Payload– Required Observations– Detectors
Detectors
• We use 3 types of detectors:
1. Wide Field Cameras (WFC)
2.2. X- Ray Telescope (XPT)X- Ray Telescope (XPT)
3. Infrared Telescope (IT)
• Payload– Required Observations– Detectors
Wide Field Camera
• 4 wide field cameras:
Size
Mask
Detector
cm2 90 x 90
70 x 70
Height 167 cm
Spectral range
keV
0.1 - 15
15 - 100
FOV
4 x FOV
30° x 30°
60° x 60°
Coded MaskImaging deviceSize: 90 x 90 cm2Material: Tungsten IBIS mask
DEPFET type: Soft X-Ray detector
CdTe type: Hard X-Ray detector
• Payload– Required Observations– Detectors
X-Ray Pointing Telescope
• Telescope mirror:• Silicon pore optics • r = 28 cm, f = 5.5 m• Effective Area: 1400 cm2 @ 1.5 keV• FOV: 10 arcmin• Angular resolution: 5 arcsec ( 2 arcsec)
• Detector:• DEPFET • Size: 3.2 x 3.2 cm2 [640 x 640 pixels]• no active cooling
Pore structure optics
High spatial resolution + Spectroscopy
• Payload– Required Observations– Detectors
Near Infrared
NIR Telescope:• Diameter: 0.85 m• Weight: 50 kg• Height: 1.5 m
NIR Camera:• FOV: 10 x 10 arcmin• Sensitivity for R ~ 100: 26.8 mJy@10σ• Angular Resolution: ~0.3 arcsec• Rockwell Scientific HgCdTe
2048 x 2048 pixels• Passive cooling
Ritchey-Chrétien design
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis – Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Atitude Control
Launcher
Soyuz-Fregat
Launch: spaceport in Korou
Cost: ~ 45M€
Total payload mass: 1500 kg
Fairing dimensions: 3.5m in diameter, 7m in height
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis – Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Atitude Control
Orbit / Propulsion
http://wso.vilspa.esa.es/Conferences/Madrid_2003/Launchers_Russian_capabilities.pdf
Orbit:• halo-orbit around L2• excluding observational on the galactical
plane.
Propulsion System:
• Correct the flight trajectory to L2
• Keeping around the L2
• Offloading of the reaction-wheels
• Propellant: hydrazine
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis – Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Atitude Control
AccomodationS
UN
Solar arraysWide field of view camerasInfrared telescopeX-Ray telescopeStar trackerService Module
3.24 m
3 m 2 m
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis – Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Atitude Control
Accomodation
3D Plot and Rotation
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis – Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Atitude Control
Mass estimates
Payload mass: 550 kg
Spacecraft bus dry mass: 776 kg
Propellant mass: 50 kg
Total mass: 1376 kgLow mass spacecraft
Smaller launcher
Cheaper mission
Very exciting science for very low cost!
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis – Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Atitude Control
Power
• Solar Arrays: Highly efficient Multijunction GaInP/GaAs
• Efficiency: 19 %
• Area: 12 m²
• Power (avg.): 700 W
• Battery for peak power and backup
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis – Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Atitude Control
Thermal Control
Instruments Temperature:• IR: ~50K• Hard X: ~253K
Payload Module
Service Module
IR (2 m²)
X-Ray (0.01 m²)
Sum = 9 m²
Passive cooling by black painting
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis – Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Attitude Control
Telemetry: Overall Data Rate
• Diffuse X- Ray background Large amount of data from the WFC
Detailed calculations for 1 WFC:Expected number of counts: 7600 photon/sData / photon: X-Ray energy + (x,y) position
4 WFC: 900 kbits/sX-Ray telescope: 100 kbits/sIR telescope: 2 kbits/sHousekeeping: 2kbits/sTotal data rate: 1 Mbit/s
30 bits/photon
For 1 WFC: 7600 x 30 = 225 kbits/s
• Including all the instruments:
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis – Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Attitude Control
Telemetry: Communication
• Continuous data transmission through a high gain antenna
• Quasi real time ground data processing [15 s delay]
• Medium gain antenna for minor transmissions or emergency situation
• On board data storage: few Gbits
• Realistic scenario in 10 years [assuming improvements in antenna technology]
• Mission Architecture– Mission Analysis – Spacecraft Engineering– Telemetry– Attitude Control
Attitude Control
4 reaction wheels:• 3 orthogonal [necessary for 3D pointing]• 1 in a plane tilted with an angle of 45° to the
other ones [as a fail safe]
but... why reaction wheels?• Monopropellant trusters require extra fuel
and are less accurate in pointing• Control of the angular position and rotation
Technical details:• Angular speed: 1° in 2 sec Whole field of view in only 1 minute!•Weight: 4 x 7 kg = 28 kg
example of reaction wheel
Observational Strategy
WFC
XPT
Ground stationIR
Earth telescopes
evtl. repointing
e.g. VLT, ...
po
intin
g
~ 60 s position ~ 1"spectrum
spectrum
position ~ 5"spectrum
follow-up observations
every 1ms
~ 100s
Estimated Costs Payload:
15 MEuro Spacecraft bus:
41 MEuro Program level:
7 MEuro Ground Equipment:
5 MEuro Launch:
45 MEuro
Total estimated cost (without operation costs): ~ 113 Meuro
• 3 years Mission (possible extension)
• Spacecraft designed for 10 years lifetime
• Areas where X-RED is improving on SWIFT:
– X-Ray sensitivity below 10 keV – important for high z detections
– Same area, same sky coverage, but lower background
– IR telescope for follow-up observation
– Continous observations from L2
Why X-RED?
vs.
Early Universe Gamma Ray Burst Detection
Why X-RED?
Early Universe Gamma Ray Burst Detection
• Areas where X-RED is improving on SWIFT:
– X-Ray sensitivity below 10 keV – important for high z detections
– Same area, same sky coverage, but lower background
– IR telescope for follow-up observation
– Continous observations from L2
Conclusions• High redshift GRBs (z = 10-30) are detectable with
• IR-Spectroscopy allows to measure the redshift of these GRBs
• In a 3 year mission we estimate to detect 10 GRBs with z>10
will place constraints on the formation of the first generation of stars and hence on the evolution of the Early Universe.
Red Team
Science
Payload Mission