E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U...

17
FEDERAL UTILITY PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP SEMINAR November 15-16, 2017 Ontario, California VA Energy Performance Contracting Program - Update Hosted by:

Transcript of E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U...

Page 1: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

FEDERAL UTILITY PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP SEMINAR

November 15-16 2017 Ontario California

VA Energy Performance Contracting Program - Update

Hosted by

Program Updates

bull Budget reallocation for FY18 shifted oversight ofseveral energy programs in VA

bull Continuous updating of equipment safety and cybersecurity requirements

bull VA Modernization efforts include a focus on addressing facility maintenance issues and deficiencies

bull Increasing support for blending appropriations withfinancing to maximize benefit

bull Utilities and their ESCO partners developing reputations across VA ndash Delivery during implementation is key ndash Successes leading to more work

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

2

Pipeline Updates bull Program is supporting

ndash $404 million in construction or MampV ndash $650 million in development ndash 88 VA Medical Center campuses ndash Approx 80 million square feet of medical center space

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

$- $500000000 $1000000000

ESPC

UESC

Awarded

In Development

3

Federal Utility Partnership Working GroupNovember 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Site Data Package

4

Federal rtnership Working GroupNove 16 2017 Ontario CA

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Communication ndash getting leadership involved early and often bull Customer Service Agreement bull Program office briefings

Utility Pa mber 15- 5

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Sharing common issues from program officeContracting levels bull Eg metering amp IT technical issues with code

compliance etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

6

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Communication ndash ensuring all key stakeholders are involved continuously at hospital network and central office levels (eg Chief engineer site engineers maintenance nursingmedical staff VISNnetwork staff central office approvers etc) bull Involved amp responsive COR (technical monitors for

multisite projects) are key

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

7

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Utilization of a Government accessible FTP site

ndash Tracking ECMs as they are eliminatedadded changed so there are no surprises

ndash Tracking Requests for Informationsubmittals at (bi-)weekly meetings as well as keeping open itemskey issues on the agenda so things donrsquot slip through the cracks

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

8

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Integrating Project facilitator and Federal Project Executive (for ESPCs) making use of expertise

ndash Think outside the box Northport UESC helicopter lift ndash httpirtdefensegov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

9

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Use of a reserve account for potential asbestos

ndash Applying capital funds strategically (end of year dollars infrastructure upgrades funded projects that relate to other scope)

ndash Rebates amp Incentives ndash incorporating in TO schedules to reduce the amount financed

ndash Performance Period Services (MampV OampMRR) should NOT be financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

10

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 2: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Program Updates

bull Budget reallocation for FY18 shifted oversight ofseveral energy programs in VA

bull Continuous updating of equipment safety and cybersecurity requirements

bull VA Modernization efforts include a focus on addressing facility maintenance issues and deficiencies

bull Increasing support for blending appropriations withfinancing to maximize benefit

bull Utilities and their ESCO partners developing reputations across VA ndash Delivery during implementation is key ndash Successes leading to more work

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

2

Pipeline Updates bull Program is supporting

ndash $404 million in construction or MampV ndash $650 million in development ndash 88 VA Medical Center campuses ndash Approx 80 million square feet of medical center space

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

$- $500000000 $1000000000

ESPC

UESC

Awarded

In Development

3

Federal Utility Partnership Working GroupNovember 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Site Data Package

4

Federal rtnership Working GroupNove 16 2017 Ontario CA

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Communication ndash getting leadership involved early and often bull Customer Service Agreement bull Program office briefings

Utility Pa mber 15- 5

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Sharing common issues from program officeContracting levels bull Eg metering amp IT technical issues with code

compliance etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

6

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Communication ndash ensuring all key stakeholders are involved continuously at hospital network and central office levels (eg Chief engineer site engineers maintenance nursingmedical staff VISNnetwork staff central office approvers etc) bull Involved amp responsive COR (technical monitors for

multisite projects) are key

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

7

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Utilization of a Government accessible FTP site

ndash Tracking ECMs as they are eliminatedadded changed so there are no surprises

ndash Tracking Requests for Informationsubmittals at (bi-)weekly meetings as well as keeping open itemskey issues on the agenda so things donrsquot slip through the cracks

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

8

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Integrating Project facilitator and Federal Project Executive (for ESPCs) making use of expertise

ndash Think outside the box Northport UESC helicopter lift ndash httpirtdefensegov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

9

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Use of a reserve account for potential asbestos

ndash Applying capital funds strategically (end of year dollars infrastructure upgrades funded projects that relate to other scope)

ndash Rebates amp Incentives ndash incorporating in TO schedules to reduce the amount financed

ndash Performance Period Services (MampV OampMRR) should NOT be financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

10

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 3: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Pipeline Updates bull Program is supporting

ndash $404 million in construction or MampV ndash $650 million in development ndash 88 VA Medical Center campuses ndash Approx 80 million square feet of medical center space

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

$- $500000000 $1000000000

ESPC

UESC

Awarded

In Development

3

Federal Utility Partnership Working GroupNovember 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Site Data Package

4

Federal rtnership Working GroupNove 16 2017 Ontario CA

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Communication ndash getting leadership involved early and often bull Customer Service Agreement bull Program office briefings

Utility Pa mber 15- 5

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Sharing common issues from program officeContracting levels bull Eg metering amp IT technical issues with code

compliance etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

6

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Communication ndash ensuring all key stakeholders are involved continuously at hospital network and central office levels (eg Chief engineer site engineers maintenance nursingmedical staff VISNnetwork staff central office approvers etc) bull Involved amp responsive COR (technical monitors for

multisite projects) are key

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

7

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Utilization of a Government accessible FTP site

ndash Tracking ECMs as they are eliminatedadded changed so there are no surprises

ndash Tracking Requests for Informationsubmittals at (bi-)weekly meetings as well as keeping open itemskey issues on the agenda so things donrsquot slip through the cracks

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

8

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Integrating Project facilitator and Federal Project Executive (for ESPCs) making use of expertise

ndash Think outside the box Northport UESC helicopter lift ndash httpirtdefensegov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

9

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Use of a reserve account for potential asbestos

ndash Applying capital funds strategically (end of year dollars infrastructure upgrades funded projects that relate to other scope)

ndash Rebates amp Incentives ndash incorporating in TO schedules to reduce the amount financed

ndash Performance Period Services (MampV OampMRR) should NOT be financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

10

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 4: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Federal Utility Partnership Working GroupNovember 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Site Data Package

4

Federal rtnership Working GroupNove 16 2017 Ontario CA

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Communication ndash getting leadership involved early and often bull Customer Service Agreement bull Program office briefings

Utility Pa mber 15- 5

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Sharing common issues from program officeContracting levels bull Eg metering amp IT technical issues with code

compliance etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

6

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Communication ndash ensuring all key stakeholders are involved continuously at hospital network and central office levels (eg Chief engineer site engineers maintenance nursingmedical staff VISNnetwork staff central office approvers etc) bull Involved amp responsive COR (technical monitors for

multisite projects) are key

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

7

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Utilization of a Government accessible FTP site

ndash Tracking ECMs as they are eliminatedadded changed so there are no surprises

ndash Tracking Requests for Informationsubmittals at (bi-)weekly meetings as well as keeping open itemskey issues on the agenda so things donrsquot slip through the cracks

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

8

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Integrating Project facilitator and Federal Project Executive (for ESPCs) making use of expertise

ndash Think outside the box Northport UESC helicopter lift ndash httpirtdefensegov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

9

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Use of a reserve account for potential asbestos

ndash Applying capital funds strategically (end of year dollars infrastructure upgrades funded projects that relate to other scope)

ndash Rebates amp Incentives ndash incorporating in TO schedules to reduce the amount financed

ndash Performance Period Services (MampV OampMRR) should NOT be financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

10

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 5: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Federal rtnership Working GroupNove 16 2017 Ontario CA

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Communication ndash getting leadership involved early and often bull Customer Service Agreement bull Program office briefings

Utility Pa mber 15- 5

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Sharing common issues from program officeContracting levels bull Eg metering amp IT technical issues with code

compliance etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

6

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Communication ndash ensuring all key stakeholders are involved continuously at hospital network and central office levels (eg Chief engineer site engineers maintenance nursingmedical staff VISNnetwork staff central office approvers etc) bull Involved amp responsive COR (technical monitors for

multisite projects) are key

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

7

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Utilization of a Government accessible FTP site

ndash Tracking ECMs as they are eliminatedadded changed so there are no surprises

ndash Tracking Requests for Informationsubmittals at (bi-)weekly meetings as well as keeping open itemskey issues on the agenda so things donrsquot slip through the cracks

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

8

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Integrating Project facilitator and Federal Project Executive (for ESPCs) making use of expertise

ndash Think outside the box Northport UESC helicopter lift ndash httpirtdefensegov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

9

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Use of a reserve account for potential asbestos

ndash Applying capital funds strategically (end of year dollars infrastructure upgrades funded projects that relate to other scope)

ndash Rebates amp Incentives ndash incorporating in TO schedules to reduce the amount financed

ndash Performance Period Services (MampV OampMRR) should NOT be financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

10

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 6: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 1 Planning

ndash Sharing common issues from program officeContracting levels bull Eg metering amp IT technical issues with code

compliance etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

6

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Communication ndash ensuring all key stakeholders are involved continuously at hospital network and central office levels (eg Chief engineer site engineers maintenance nursingmedical staff VISNnetwork staff central office approvers etc) bull Involved amp responsive COR (technical monitors for

multisite projects) are key

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

7

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Utilization of a Government accessible FTP site

ndash Tracking ECMs as they are eliminatedadded changed so there are no surprises

ndash Tracking Requests for Informationsubmittals at (bi-)weekly meetings as well as keeping open itemskey issues on the agenda so things donrsquot slip through the cracks

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

8

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Integrating Project facilitator and Federal Project Executive (for ESPCs) making use of expertise

ndash Think outside the box Northport UESC helicopter lift ndash httpirtdefensegov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

9

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Use of a reserve account for potential asbestos

ndash Applying capital funds strategically (end of year dollars infrastructure upgrades funded projects that relate to other scope)

ndash Rebates amp Incentives ndash incorporating in TO schedules to reduce the amount financed

ndash Performance Period Services (MampV OampMRR) should NOT be financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

10

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 7: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Communication ndash ensuring all key stakeholders are involved continuously at hospital network and central office levels (eg Chief engineer site engineers maintenance nursingmedical staff VISNnetwork staff central office approvers etc) bull Involved amp responsive COR (technical monitors for

multisite projects) are key

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

7

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Utilization of a Government accessible FTP site

ndash Tracking ECMs as they are eliminatedadded changed so there are no surprises

ndash Tracking Requests for Informationsubmittals at (bi-)weekly meetings as well as keeping open itemskey issues on the agenda so things donrsquot slip through the cracks

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

8

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Integrating Project facilitator and Federal Project Executive (for ESPCs) making use of expertise

ndash Think outside the box Northport UESC helicopter lift ndash httpirtdefensegov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

9

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Use of a reserve account for potential asbestos

ndash Applying capital funds strategically (end of year dollars infrastructure upgrades funded projects that relate to other scope)

ndash Rebates amp Incentives ndash incorporating in TO schedules to reduce the amount financed

ndash Performance Period Services (MampV OampMRR) should NOT be financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

10

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 8: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Utilization of a Government accessible FTP site

ndash Tracking ECMs as they are eliminatedadded changed so there are no surprises

ndash Tracking Requests for Informationsubmittals at (bi-)weekly meetings as well as keeping open itemskey issues on the agenda so things donrsquot slip through the cracks

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

8

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Integrating Project facilitator and Federal Project Executive (for ESPCs) making use of expertise

ndash Think outside the box Northport UESC helicopter lift ndash httpirtdefensegov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

9

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Use of a reserve account for potential asbestos

ndash Applying capital funds strategically (end of year dollars infrastructure upgrades funded projects that relate to other scope)

ndash Rebates amp Incentives ndash incorporating in TO schedules to reduce the amount financed

ndash Performance Period Services (MampV OampMRR) should NOT be financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

10

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 9: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Integrating Project facilitator and Federal Project Executive (for ESPCs) making use of expertise

ndash Think outside the box Northport UESC helicopter lift ndash httpirtdefensegov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

9

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Use of a reserve account for potential asbestos

ndash Applying capital funds strategically (end of year dollars infrastructure upgrades funded projects that relate to other scope)

ndash Rebates amp Incentives ndash incorporating in TO schedules to reduce the amount financed

ndash Performance Period Services (MampV OampMRR) should NOT be financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

10

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 10: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 2 PAIGA (Pre-Award)

ndash Use of a reserve account for potential asbestos

ndash Applying capital funds strategically (end of year dollars infrastructure upgrades funded projects that relate to other scope)

ndash Rebates amp Incentives ndash incorporating in TO schedules to reduce the amount financed

ndash Performance Period Services (MampV OampMRR) should NOT be financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

10

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 11: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award) bull Implementation Kick Off Meeting

ndash In person (preferably) ndash Identification of the CORTechnical Monitor ndash Payroll submission ndash Daily Reports ndash Badging facility access issues parking behavior etc ndash Infection Control ndash Environmental coordinator ndash Recycling credits etc ndash List of UtilityESCO POCs for facility reference ndash emergency

contacts ndash OSHA Certifications Competent person etc ndash Preconstruction kickoff meetings ndash Submission of schedules3 week look ahead etc

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

11

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 12: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Interconnection issues (renewables or CHP) bull Early and frequent communication with the utility from

30 design on

bull Reserve fund for interconnection costs

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

12

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 13: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 3 Implementation (Post-Award)

ndash Modifications bull Funded or financed

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

13

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 14: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Having Project Facilitator review MampV reports

act as technical support for COR

bull Ensuring performance assurance is included (sign off on language in NTP for PA)

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

14

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 15: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Best PracticesLessons Learned ndash Phase 4 MampVPerformance Assurance bull Annual post acceptance COCOR verification

Government witnessingchecklisttrip

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

15

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 16: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Northport UESC video

httpsyoutube4tRtuyK7FEI

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

16

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17

Page 17: E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U o ] ( } v ] s v P Ç ... · E } À u í ñ r í ò U î ì í ó K v ] } U W ] l> } v > v t W Z í WW o v v ] v P

Questions

Lara Spader LaraGastvagov

Bayla Gewirtz BaylaGewirtzvagov

Evan Bishop EvanBishopvagov

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group November 15-16 2017 Ontario CA

17


WDW < Ç } u ] } v } ( } o µ W µ ( } u í ì lW } í í ì lW & ] v o Z }...Z ] Ì v ] Á } v o µ Z Z ( } u v } ( Z v ( v Á µ ( ( ] ] v ] v Z } u ] } v µ v P Æ í ì lW X d

WDW < Ç } u ] } v } ( } o µ W µ ( } u í ì lW } í í ì lW & ] v o Z }...Z ] Ì v ] Á } v o µ Z Z ( } u v } ( Z v ( v Á µ ( ( ] ] v ] v Z } u ] } v µ v P Æ í ì lW X d

Z } v ] } v } u u ] v ] ] ( î ì í õ › sites › gpseo › files › document › 2020-06 › CC_2020 … · í ó Z } v ] } v } u u ] v ] ] ( î ì î ì } o ] ~ ì U í í

Z } v ] } v } u u ] v ] ] ( î ì í õ › sites › gpseo › files › document › 2020-06 › CC_2020 … · í ó Z } v ] } v } u u ] v ] ] ( î ì î ì } o ] ~ ì U í í

] u o v & v µ ] î ì í ò J d o µ } u ] ( ] > ] Z ] µ u ð ô À...] u o v & v µ ] î ì í ò J ï ò À î í Z ï òs í ó U ñ Z ï ò À í ð Z ï ò À í í U ò Z ï

] u o v & v µ ] î ì í ò J d o µ } u ] ( ] > ] Z ] µ u ð ô À...] u o v & v µ ] î ì í ò J ï ò À î í Z ï òs í ó U ñ Z ï ò À í ð Z ï ò À í í U ò Z ï

, µ o o l Ì o o ] u v v U W í À v Ç W î ì í õ X u ] µ í r i o · , µ o o l Ì o o _ ] u v v U W À v Ç W î ì í õ X u ] µ í r i o

, µ o o l Ì o o ] u v v U W í À v Ç W î ì í õ X u ] µ í r i o · , µ o o l Ì o o _ ] u v v U W À v Ç W î ì í õ X u ] µ í r i o

NOTA - Farmacêutico · X í ñ r ( u ] } P ] } U } ] P } ] u v U ] ! v ] í X µ ] r µ } ] o v ] À } } v } À ] U ( µ v }

NOTA - Farmacêutico · X í ñ r ( u ] } P ] } U } ] P } ] u v U ] ! v ] í X µ ] r µ } ] o v ] À } } v } À ] U ( µ v }

K ] v P ^ Ç u W W ] v ] o v W ]pages.di.unipi.it/bonuccelli/01-introduction.pdf · } u µ W ( } u v K À d ] u í õ ô í í õ õ ò î ì í í ( } D/W^ í ï ì ì í ì ì ì

K ] v P ^ Ç u W W ] v ] o v W ]pages.di.unipi.it/bonuccelli/01-introduction.pdf · } u µ W ( } u v K À d ] u í õ ô í í õ õ ò î ì í í ( } D/W^ í ï ì ì í ì ì ì

v U ^ X X U r ì ô ì ì í ô ñ í V À v ] µ } v · u } í ô U î ...€¦ · } v i µ v } ó í U o } v } u ] v ] } o Z d } Á U s ] o K o ] u ] ì ð ñ ñ í r ì ì ì X

v U ^ X X U r ì ô ì ì í ô ñ í V À v ] µ } v · u } í ô U î ...€¦ · } v i µ v } ó í U o } v } u ] v ] } o Z d } Á U s ] o K o ] u ] ì ð ñ ñ í r ì ì ì X

KR-01 - 稲葉製作所...>3 u v Ü È>í u v Ü È>î u v Ü È>î u v Ü È>í u v Ü È>î u v Ü È>î >Ô>à>Õ u e S >Ô>ß>Õ u >í >Ô>ß>Õ u >í >Ô>ß>Õ u >í >Ô>á>Õ

KR-01 - 稲葉製作所...>3 u v Ü È>í u v Ü È>î u v Ü È>î u v Ü È>í u v Ü È>î u v Ü È>î >Ô>à>Õ u e S >Ô>ß>Õ u >í >Ô>ß>Õ u >í >Ô>ß>Õ u >í >Ô>á>Õ

v } µ ] } v } Z î ì í ô ] ] } v } ( / í ñ ô ð r î ì í ô ... · X t ] r: v > U hd o ] v P } v o U v : µ o Ç ï í U î ì í õ ...

v } µ ] } v } Z î ì í ô ] ] } v } ( / í ñ ô ð r î ì í ô ... · X t ] r: v > U hd o ] v P } v o U v : µ o Ç ï í U î ì í õ ...

Z v D v P u v í ì í W ^ u o ] v ] v P z } µ W ^ Ç u · < ] Z v D v P u v í ì í W ^ u o ] v ] v P z } µ W ^ Ç u ñ l î ð l î ì í ó } Ç ] P Z î ì í ó Z µ v K Á

Z v D v P u v í ì í W ^ u o ] v ] v P z } µ W ^ Ç u · < ] Z v D v P u v í ì í W ^ u o ] v ] v P z } µ W ^ Ç u ñ l î ð l î ì í ó } Ç ] P Z î ì í ó Z µ v K Á

u v - cengage.com.au BSBMGT516_assessment.pdf · ^ D'd ñ í ò & ] o ] } v ] v µ } µ ] u } À u v t u v v P P > v ] v P µ o ] î ì í ò í

u v - cengage.com.au BSBMGT516_assessment.pdf · ^ D'd ñ í ò & ] o ] } v ] v µ } µ ] u } À u v t u v v P P > v ] v P µ o ] î ì í ò í

Actuonix LAC Datasheet - Amazon Simple Storage ServiceLAC+Datasheet.pdf · Æ v o } v v ] } v ] o y í WY í î µ } } v v } ñ ] v U í u u W ] Z &W } v v }

Actuonix LAC Datasheet - Amazon Simple Storage ServiceLAC+Datasheet.pdf · Æ v o } v v ] } v ] o y í WY í î µ } } v v } ñ ] v U í u u W ] Z &W } v v }

E u d u / u l l DK í õ r í & o µ ] v v vDK í õ r í ] & o ... · d u À ] v l vDK í õ r í > ] Ì } o u vDK í õ r í / u l l DK í õ r í & o µ ] v v vDK í õ r í

E u d u / u l l DK í õ r í & o µ ] v v vDK í õ r í ] & o ... · d u À ] v l vDK í õ r í > ] Ì } o u vDK í õ r í / u l l DK í õ r í & o µ ] v v vDK í õ r í

z r> t^ U E WK>/ / ^ o í t . v ] } v o ï t D u } ( Z } ] Ç · í X í ô ^W µ o ] Z D u _ u v u u } ( Z s } v P W µ o ] Z o V í X í õ ^Z } ] } ( Z ^ } ] Ç _ u v o o Z Á

z r> t^ U E WK>/ / ^ o í t . v ] } v o ï t D u } ( Z } ] Ç · í X í ô ^W µ o ] Z D u _ u v u u } ( Z s } v P W µ o ] Z o V í X í õ ^Z } ] } ( Z ^ } ] Ç _ u v o o Z Á

s ] Z v µ , } unityagni.com/.../Vishnu-Homam-Sanskrit-Regular.pdf · & , } u K v o ] v / v r } v o Á Á Á X v ] Ç P v ] X } u } v W = õ í õ î ô ï í í í í í ï

s ] Z v µ , } unityagni.com/.../Vishnu-Homam-Sanskrit-Regular.pdf · & , } u K v o ] v / v r } v o Á Á Á X v ] Ç P v ] X } u } v W = õ í õ î ô ï í í í í í ï

o ' v µ - TINET' } t ' v µ î ì í ô o } v U î ^ u o î ì í ô ' } t ' v µ î ì í ô o } v U î ^ u o î ì í ô

o ' v µ - TINET' } t ' v µ î ì í ô o } v U î ^ u o î ì í ô ' } t ' v µ î ì í ô o } v U î ^ u o î ì í ô

} v ( ] v u v W ] } µ í í u ] µ î i µ ] v > } v ( ] v u v ...islesaintgeorges.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/mai2020.pdf · %UqYHV 0DL 3DJH 1 VXU 1 } v ( ] v u v W ] } µ í

} v ( ] v u v W ] } µ í í u ] µ î i µ ] v > } v ( ] v u v ...islesaintgeorges.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/mai2020.pdf · %UqYHV 0DL 3DJH 1 VXU 1 } v ( ] v u v W ] } µ í

D ~&D l t& } v ( } u v } u /E E í ï í ó í U } v u } X ^ o ...

D ~&D l t& } v ( } u v } u /E E í ï í ó í U } v u } X ^ o ...

X í X í / v ] ] o ^ ] ( ] ] } v } ( / }d r v o µ } v } u ... · ï µ } u ] À ] v P & µ v ] } v v Z o rd ] u ^ Z ] v P í ò ï X í µ } u s o W l ] v P í ò ï X í X í &

X í X í / v ] ] o ^ ] ( ] ] } v } ( / }d r v o µ } v } u ... · ï µ } u ] À ] v P & µ v ] } v v Z o rd ] u ^ Z ] v P í ò ï X í µ } u s o W l ] v P í ò ï X í X í &

54th EEI Handout Finalñ ð î Z / & ] v v ] o } v ( v n X } u ^ ] ] } ( ^ u ï ì U î ì í õ Æ ( } u l ] o ] Ì ] } v } ( E } À u ð U î ì í õ v } ( u ï í U î ì í ô

54th EEI Handout Finalñ ð î Z / & ] v v ] o } v ( v n X } u ^ ] ] } ( ^ u ï ì U î ì í õ Æ ( } u l ] o ] Ì ] } v } ( E } À u ð U î ì í õ v } ( u ï í U î ì í ô