E F Gdm5migu4zj3pb.cloudfront.net/manuscripts/72000/... · D E . F . Supplemental Figure 7....
Transcript of E F Gdm5migu4zj3pb.cloudfront.net/manuscripts/72000/... · D E . F . Supplemental Figure 7....
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160 PBS
DOX
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
OC
R (
pm
ol/m
in)/
ug
pro
tein
Control
DOX
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Lu
cif
era
se
(f
old
ch
an
ge
ove
r E
V)
y = 410.66x - 0.4014 R² = 0.997
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Do
xo
rub
icin
(µ
M)
Absorbance (480 nm)
A B
baseline OM CCCP R/A
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Control DOX
Ce
llu
lar
no
n-h
em
e iro
n
(μM
/μg
pro
tein
)
*
*
TfR1 Fpn1
*
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Lu
cif
era
se
(fo
ld c
han
ge o
ver
EV
)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Lu
cif
era
se
(fo
ld c
han
ge
ov
er
EV
)
TfR1-IRE
Control TfR1-IRE
DOX TfR1-IRE∆
DOX
TfR1-IRE
Control TfR1-IRE
DFO TfR1-IRE∆
Control
TfR1-IRE∆ DFO
* * * * * *
* * *
*
* N.S.
C
E F G
H
N.S. m
RN
A l
ev
els
(% c
han
ge o
ver
co
ntr
ol)
D
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Control DOX
Mean
TM
RE
flu
ore
scen
ce
*
Supplemental Figure 1. Doxorubicin regulates cellular iron homeostasis
(A) Absorbance (480 nm) was measured in NRCM at increasing concentrations of DOX. (B) Analysis of mitochondrial
oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in NRCM with DOX or control treatment quantified using Seahorse Bioanalyzer.
Respiration rates are measured at baseline, in the presence of oligomycin (OM, inhibitor of ATP synthase), carbonyl cyanide
m-chlorophenol (CCCP, dissipation of proton gradient), and rotenone/antimycin A (R/A, respiratory chain inhibitors) and
normalized to protein concentration of each sample (n=12). (C) Mitochondrial membrane potential assessed by TMRE
staining and flow cytometry in NRCM treated with 10μM DOX for 16 hours (n=3). (D) Total cellular non-heme iron levels in
NRCM treated with 10μM DOX for 16 hours determined by Ferene S assay (n=3). (E) mRNA expression of cellular iron
regulatory proteins, transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) involved in iron import, and ferroportin 1 (Fpn1) involved in iron export, in
NRCM treated with 10μM DOX for 16 hours (n=6). (F-H) Luciferase assay of regulation of either full-length 3’UTR of TfR1
(TfR1-IRE) or 3’UTR of TfR1 with deletion of all five IREs (TfR1-IRE∆) by 200 μM DFO (F,G) and 10μM DOX (H) in HEK293
cells treated for 16 hours and normalized to renilla luciferase expression and empty vector (EV) expression (n=12). Data are
presented as mean±SEM. *P < 0.05.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
ABCB6 ABCB7 ABCB10
mR
NA
leve
ls (f
old
chan
ge)
- DOX + DOXA B
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
ABCB6 ABCB7 ABCB10
PBS DOX
mR
NA
leve
ls (F
old
chan
ge)
in vivo in vitro
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
control 0.1 µM 1 µM 10 µM 100 µM
0102030405060708090
100
Control 1µM 10 µM 100 µM0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Control 0.1µM 10 µM 100 µM
DAP
I neg
ativ
e
(Per
cent
sur
viva
l)
*
E
*
Anne
xin
V ne
gativ
e
(Per
cent
sur
viva
l)
D
Luci
fera
se a
ctiv
ity
(Rel
ativ
e to
con
trol
)
* *
F
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 μM 1 μM 10 μM 100 μM
Tryp
an b
lue
nega
tive
(P
erce
nt s
urvi
val)
*
C
Supplemental Figure 2. Doxorubicin does not regulate other mitochondrial ABC proteins and DOX regulation of ABCB8 is not through its effects on cell death (A) mRNA levels of three other mitochondrial ABC transporter genes were measured in mouse heart that had been treated with 6 mg/kg per day injection every third day for a total of four injections (Protocol 2) or saline (PBS) (n=4). Measurements were performed via qRT-PCR, normalized to 18S rRNA expression, and reported as a percentage of measurements obtained in the absence of DOX treatment. (B) mRNA levels of mitochondrial ABC proteins in NRCM treated with 10 µM DOX or control vehicle (n=6). (C-E) Cell death in HEK293 cells in response to various doses of DOX, as assessed by DAPI staining (n=6) (C), Annexin V staining (n=6) (D), and Trypan blue staining (n=3) (E). (F) Luciferase assay of the effects of DOX on the expression of luciferase construct driven by 6 kb of ABCB8 promoter (n=6). DOX at doses that did not affect cell death (i.e., 10 µM) still caused a reduction in the levels of ABCB8. Data are presented as mean±SEM. *P < 0.05.
A
02000400060008000
100001200014000
Control siRNA ABCB8 siRNA
Cyt
osol
ic ir
on
(CPM
/μg
prot
ein)
- DOX + DOX
B
0
500
1000
1500
Control siRNA ABCB8 siRNA
Nuc
lear
iron
(C
PM/μ
g pr
otei
n)
- DOX + DOX
D
GAPDH
Lamin A
Nucleus Cytosol
Lamin C
Supplemental Figure 3. Nuclear and cytosolic iron levels with ABCB8 siRNA with and without DOX in NRCM. (A) Levels of other mitochondrial ABC protein in NRCM with and without ABCB8 downregulation. (B) Western blot analysis of nuclear and cytosolic fraction purity in NRCM (n=3). (C, d) Nuclear (C) and cytosolic (D) iron with control and ABCB8 siRNA in the presence and absence of DOX (n=3). Data are presented as mean±SEM. *P < 0.05.
*
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
ABCB6 ABCB7 ABCB8 ABCB10
Fold
Cha
nge
ControlABCB8
*
siRNA siRNA
C
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
Ad-GFP Ad-ABCB8
Cyt
osol
ic ir
on
(CPM
/μg
prot
ein)
- DOX + DOX
0
500
1000
1500
Ad-GFP Ad-ABCB8
Nuc
lear
iron
(C
PM/μ
g pr
otei
n)
- DOX + DOX
A B
Supplemental Figure 4. Nuclear and cytosolic iron levels with ABCB8 overexpression with and without DOX in NRCM (A) Nuclear iron and (B) cytosolic iron with control and ABCB8 overexpression in the presence and absence of DOX (n=3). Data are presented as mean±SEM. *P < 0.05.
00.20.40.60.8
11.2
Liver Lung Kidney
ABC
B8
(den
sito
met
ry)
NTG ABCB8 TG
0
1
2
3
4
5
NTG ABCB8 TG
Cyt
osol
ic ir
on
(μM
/μg
prot
ein)
- DOX + DOX
01234567
NTG ABCB8 TG
Nuc
lear
iron
(μ
M/μ
g pr
otei
n)
- DOX + DOX
0
100
200
300
400
NTG ABCB8 TGU
IBC
(μg/
dL)
- DOX + DOX
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000A
BC
B8
mR
NA
leve
ls
(% o
f NTG
) * ABCB8
Tubulin
TG NTG
A B TG NTG TG NTG TG NTG
Liver Lung Kidney
0
5
10
15
NTG ABCB8 TG
Lung
mito
iron
(μ
M/μ
g pr
otei
n)
- DOX + DOX
C
05
1015202530
NTG ABCB8 TG
Live
r mito
iron
(μ
M/μ
g pr
otei
n)
- DOX + DOX
D
0
5
10
15
20
NTG ABCB8 TG
Kid
ney
mito
iron
(μ
M/μ
g pr
otei
n)
- DOX + DOX
E
0
50
100
150
200
NTG ABCB8 TGSeru
m ir
on (μ
g/dL
)
- DOX + DOX
0100200300400500
NTG ABCB8 TG
TIB
C (μ
g/dL
)
- DOX + DOX
F
G H I J
*
* *
Supplemental Figure 5. ABCB8 expression and iron parameters in ABCB8 TG mice with and without DOX treatment (A) mRNA levels of ABCB8 in the hearts of NTG and ABCB8 TG mice (n=3). (B) ABCB8 protein levels in the lungs, livers, and kidneys of NTG and ABCB8 TG mice were evaluated via Western blot. Representative image is on the left, densitometry analysis is on the right (n=3). (C-D) Nuclear (C) and cytosolic (D) iron levels in NTG and ABCB8 TG mice with and without DOX treatment (n=4). (E-G) Mitochondrial iron levels in the lung (E), liver (F) and kidney (G) of TG and NTG mice with and without DOX (n=3). (H-J) Hematologic iron parameters, serum iron (H), unsaturated iron binding capacity, UIBC (I), and total iron binding capacity, TIBC (J) in TG and NTG mice with and without DOX (n=4-5). Data are presented as mean±SEM. *P< 0.05.
A
0
10
20
30
40
% F
S
0
1
2
3
CO
/BW
(ml/m
in·g
) B C
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
ESP EDP
Pres
sure
(mm
Hg)
NTGTG
0
100
200
300
400
NTG TG
HR
(bpm
)
E
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
HW
/BW
(mg/
g)
100 μm
Hematoxylin & Eosin Masson Trichrome
I
0
1
2
3
4
5
LVD
d (m
m)
D
TG NTG NTG TG
TG TG
TG TG
F
NTG ABCB8 TG
G H
-6000
-4000
-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
dP/d
t (m
mH
g/s)
NTGTG
dp/dtmax
dp/dtmin
NTG NTG NTG NTG
Supplemental Figure 6. Cardiac features of ABCB8 TG and NTG mice at baseline in the absence of DOX treatment M-mode echocardiographic images (A) were evaluated for measurements of fractional shortening (FS) (B), the ratio of cardiac output to body weight (CO/BW) (C), and left-ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDd) (D) in the hearts of NTG mice and ABCB8 TG (TG) mice. (E) Heart weights (n=5), and (F-G) invasive hemodynamic measurements of end systolic pressure (ESP) and end diastolic pressure (EDP) (F), dP/dtmax (a marker of systolic function) and dP/dtmin (a marker of diastolic function) (G), and heart rate (H) were performed in NTG mice and ABCB8 TG mice (n=4). (I) H & E-stained and Masson trichrome-stained sections of heart tissue from NTG mice and ABCB8 TG mice were evaluated for histological abnormalities. Data are presented as mean±SEM. *P< 0.05.
Control
DOX
Dox
0 3 6
PBS Analysis
37 day
Control
DOX
Protocol 1
Protocol 2
0 2 4 11 day
9
One week
One month
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
% o
f sur
viva
l
Days after doxorubicin injection
NTG
mABC1 TG
B C
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
% o
f sur
viva
l
Days after doxorubicin injection
NTG
mABC1TGTG
TG
A
0
100
200
300
400
500
NTG ABCB8TG
NTG ABCB8TG
PBS DOX
HR
0
10
20
30
40
NTG ABCB8TG
NTG ABCB8TG
PBS DOX
% F
S
* * *
% E
F
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
NTG ABCB8TG
NTG ABCB8TG
PBS DOX
D E F
Supplemental Figure 7. Survival rates and cardiac features of NTG and ABCB8 TG mice after DOX administration (A) Schematic representation of DOX treatment protocols. Protocol 1 consisted of a 10 mg/kg per day injection administered every other day for a total of three injections, and Protocol 2 used a 6 mg/kg per day injection every third day for a total of four injections. Cardiac function was assessed one week after the last injection for Protocol 1 and one month after the last injection for Protocol 2. (B,C) The survival rates of NTG and ABCB8 TG mice were monitored after treatment with 3 intraperitoneal injections of 10 mg/kg DOX (cumulative dose: 30 mg/kg) administered every other day (n=11) (B) or 4 intraperitoneal injections of 6 mg/kg DOX (cumulative dose: 24 mg/kg) administered every third day (n=7) (C). (D) Assessments of heart rate (HR) in NTG and ABCB8 TG mice after DOX treatment according to protocol 2 (n=6-8). (E,F) NTG and ABCB8 TG mice were treated with DOX via Protocol 1. One weeks after the final DOX injection (as opposed to one month later for Protocol 2), echocardiographic assessments of fractional shortening (FS) (E), and ejection fraction (EF) (F) were measured (n=3-5 per group). Data are presented as mean±SEM. *P< 0.05.
0
5000
10000
15000
Control DXZ DFO
Cyt
osol
ic ir
on
(CPM
/μg
prot
ein)
- DOX + DOX
0200400600800
100012001400
Control DXZ DFO
Nuc
lear
iron
(C
PM/μ
g pr
otei
n)
- DOX + DOX
*
#
A B
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
4
Control DOX DOX+DFO DOX+DXZ
Cyt
osol
ic ir
on
(μM
/μg
prot
ein)
C
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Control DOX DOX+DFO DOX+DXZ
Nuc
lear
iron
(μ
M/μ
g pr
otei
n)
D
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Hea
rt R
ate
DOX DOX +DXZ
DOX +DFO
Control
E
* * *
Supplemental Figure 8. Cytosolic and nuclear iron in mice treated with DFO and DXZ (A, B) Cytosolic (A) and nuclear (B) iron content in NRCM treated with 200μM DFO or 200μM DXZ for 16 hours with and without DOX in NRCM (n=3). (C,D) Cytosolic (D) and nuclear (D) iron levels in the hearts of WT mice treated with DOX, with or without DFO or DXZ (n=3-4). (E) Heart rate of control mice and DOX-treated mice that had been co-treated with or without DXZ or DFO. DOX treatment was according to protocol 2 (n=6).
Original Western Blots
ABCB8 protein levels in NRCMs With Dox treatment (20 mM DOX)
Full Unedited Gels for Figure 2A
Full Unedited Gels for Figure 2B
97
64
51
39
28
19
Control Control DOX DOX 97
64
51
39
28
19
ABCB8 Actin
Full Unedited Gels for Figure 2H
Mitochondrial Ferritin Tubulin
188
98
62
49
38
28
17
14
Full Unedited Gels for Figure 3A
97
64
51
39
28
19
GAPDH ABCB8
Control siRNA ABCB8 siRNA
Full Unedited Gels for Figure 5A
97
64
51
39
28
19
97
64
51
39
28
19
Full Unedited Gels for Figure 9A
188
98
62
49
38
28
17
14
6
Topoisomerase 2β and Tubulin ABCB8
Full Unedited Gels for Figure 9D
GAPDH
Top 2β
191
105
64
51
39
28
19
14
Full Unedited Gels for Figure 9E
188
98
62
49
38
28
17
14
6
Topoisomerase 2β and Tubulin
Full Unedited Gels for Figure 9F
188
98
62
49
38
28
17
14
Topoisomerase 2β Tubulin
Full Unedited Gels for Figure 9F (Cont)
Full Unedited Gels for Supplemental
Figure 3A
Lamin A/C GAPDH
188
98
62
49
38
28
17
14
Full Unedited Gels for Figure S5B
97
64
51
39
28
19
97
64
51
39
28
19