1 /-

:

&

101

2

.....&

...

/, -,

&

:

: , , ,

, , ,

3 . &

: /-

:

: , /

: , , , , , ,

ISBN: 978-960-98900-8-3 2015

. 49 32100: 2261023136, Fax: 2261021481n-lamp@otenet.grhttp://sigxroniekfrasi.blogspot.comhttps://www.facebook.com/SigxroniEkfrasi

Creative Commons 3.0

(, , , , , ), , . , . cc, : http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ne-nd/3.0.gr/

4

..4

.7

.9

1.

1.1. ..131.2. .171.3.

..201.4. .........26

2. :

2.1. ......422.2. ....42

: ....43 .......46 : .........51

5 .......54 : ..58 ...61 : .........63 .......66 : .....69 .............75 : .....78 ..........82 : ....85 ........90 : ........93 .........96 : ....98 .........101 : ....104 ...........107

2.3. .....109

3.

3.1. ...1163.1.1. ......1173.1.2. ....1213.1.3. , ....................................123

63.1.4. ...1263.1.5. ..139

......144

7

, . , 1 3 // 2012-2013.

, , .

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

8 , , . . , , , .

9

- 1 , 2. , , 3.

, , , . , 4.

, , . 1 Clark, R. & Ivanic, R. (2013). The politics of writing. New York: Routledge.2 Kostouli, T. (2009). A sociocultural flamework: Writing as social practice. In R.Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The sage handbook of writingdevelopment (pp. 98-116). California: Sage publication Inc.

3 Prior, P. (2008). A sociocultural theory of writing. In Ch. MacArthur, S. Graham & J.Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54-66). New York: Guifordpress Graham, S. (2006a). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbookof educational psychology (pp. 457-478). Manhawah, New York: Erbaum.

4 , . (2004). . : . .

10

, , , ., 5.

- , 6 . , , . , , , . , 7.

5 Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An appliedlinguistic perspective. New York: Longman.

6 Tribble, Ch. (1997). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.7 Graham, S. (2006a). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook ofeducational psychology (pp. 457-478). Manhawah, New York: Erbaum White, R. &Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. Harlow, Essex: Longman.

11

, , , 8.

8 , ., , . & , . (2010). (L1). .... , 22, 25-48 Gavriilidou,Z. & Psaltou Joycey, A. (2010). Language learning strategies: an overview. Journal ofApplied Linguistics, 25, 11-25 McCutchen, D. (2006). Cognitive factors in thedevelopment of childrens writing. In Ch. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald(Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 115-130). New York: Guiford press.

12

1.

13

1.1.

, , ,, 9. . .

, Chamot OMalley (1990), 10. (metacognitive strategies),

, , , .. , 9 Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher should know.New York: Newbury House Publishers.

10 Chamot, A.U. & O' Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second LanguageAcquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14

. (cognitive strategies),

, .- (social-affective

strategies), .. , .. .

. - , .

1: 10-12

,

15

16

,

,

17

1.2.

,, 11. ( ), ( ), ( ). Pintrich (1999) : , (monitoring) 12. ,

13.

11 , . (2005). . : .

12 Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning, International. Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.

13 Harris, K., Graham, S., Brindle, M. & Sandmel, K. (2009). Metacognition andchildrens writing. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook ofMetacognition in Education (pp. 131-153). New York: Routledge Hacker, D.,Keener, M. & Kircher, J. (2009). Writing is Applied Metacognition. In D. Hacker, J.Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 154-172). New York: Routledge Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in languageteaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18

, 14 , , . , ,

, 15., ,

14 Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. AppliedLinguistics, 19, 515-537 Graham, S. & Harris, K. (1994). The role anddevelopment of self-regulation in the writing process. In D. Schunk & B.Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues andeducational applications (p.p. 203-228). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Cohen, A.D. (1990). Language learning: insights for learners, teachers and researchers. USA:Newburry House Publishers.

15 , ., , . & , . (2010). (L1). .... , 22, 25-48 Baroudy, I.(2008). Process writing: successful and unsuccessful writers. International Journal ofEnglish Studies, 8(2), 43-63 Ferrari, M., Bouffard, T. & Rainville, L. (1998). Whatmakes a good writer? Differences in good and poor writers self-regulation ofwriting. Instructional Science. 26 (6), 473-488.

19

, 16.

16 Geladari, A. & Mastrothanasis, K. (2013). The employment of cognitive andmetacognitive strategies in bilingual pupils creative writing. In N. Lavidas, Th.Alexiou & A. M. Sougari (Eds.), Major Trends in Theoretical and AppliedLinguistics 3:Selected Papers from the 20th International Symposium on Theoreticaland Applied Linguistics (ISTAL 20) (p.p. 97-113). Poland: Versita Griva, E.,Tsakiridou, E. & Nihoritou, I. (2009). Study of FL composing process and writingstrategies employed by young learners. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Early Learning ofModern Foreign Languages (pp. 132-148). Bristol: Multilingual Matters Goddard,Y. L. & Sendi, C. (2008). Effects of self-monitoring on the narrative and expositorywriting of four Fourth-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 24(4), 408-433.

20

1.3.

, 17. , 18,

17 , ., , . & , . (2011). : . . , . . , . & . (.), 2 , 27-30 2010, 2 (. 69-78). : Yanyan, Z. (2010). Investigating the role of metacognitive knowledge in englishwriting. HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies, 14, 25-46 Lane, K. L., Harris,K. R., Graham, S., Weisenbach, J. L., Brindle, M. & Morphy, P. (2008). The effectsof self-regulated strategy development on the writing performance of second-gradestudents with behavioral and writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 41 (4),234-253 Graham, S. (2006b). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: Ameta-analysis. In Ch. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook ofwriting research (pp. 187-207). New York: Guiford press Graham, S., Harris, K. &Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge and self-efficacyof struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207-241 Keith, N. & Frese, M. (2005).Self-regulation in error management training: Emotion, control and metacognitionas mediators of performance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 677-691.

18 Rose, K. & Kasper, G. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press Kasper, L. F. (1997). Assessing the metacognitivegrowth of ESL student writers. TESL EJ, 3(1), 1-20 Welch, M. (1992). ThePLEASE strategy: A metacognitive learning strategy for improving the paragraphwriting of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 119128.

21

, , 19. , 20. . .

19 Reshadi, E. & Aidinlou, N. A. (2012). Investigating the relationship between writingmetacognitive awareness and use of cohesiveties in Iranian EFL context. Journal ofBasic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (5), 4699-4705 Goddard, Y. L. & Sendi, C.(2008). Effects of self-monitoring on the narrative and expository writing of fourFourth-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly,24(4), 408-433 Lu, W. J. (2006). Relationship between metacognitive strategies andEnglish writing. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (9), 25-27 Xu, J. F. &Tang F. (2005). Review of previous research on English writing metacognition inChina and abroad. Foreign Language World, (5), 17-23 De La Paz, S. & Graham, S.(2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction inmiddle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 291304 Yarrow,F. & Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitiveprompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of EducationalPsychology, 71, 261282

20 Graham, S., Harris, K. & Olinghouse, N. (2007). Addressing executive functiondifficulties in writing: An example from the Self-Regulated Strategy Developmentmodel. In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Executive functioning in education: from theory topractice (pp. 216-236). New York: Guilford Hsiao, T. Y. & Oxford, R. L. (2002).Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis.Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 368-383 Graham, S. & Harris, K. (2000). Therole of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development.Educational Psychologist, 35, 312 Graham, S. & Harris, K. (1993). Self-regulatedstrategy development: Helping students with learning problems develop as writers.The Elementary School Journal, 94 (2), 169-181 Graham, S. & Harris, K. & Reid,R. (1992). Developing self-regulated learners. Focus on Exceptional Children, 24, 1-16 Harris, K. & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction:Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392-405.

22

(process goal) (content goal), .

CALLA (Cognitive AcademicLanguage Learning Approach). , . 21:

: , , .

: . .21 , . (2005). : . , 3, 70-77 Chamot, A. U.(2005). Language Learning Strategy Instruction: Current Issues and Research.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130 Oxford, R. L. (2001). Languagelearning strategies. In R. Carter, D. Nunan (eds.), The Cambridge guide to speakersof other languages (pp. 166.-172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23

: . .

: , , .

: ( ), 22.

22 Anderson, J. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard UniversityPress.

24

1: CALLA23.

, ,

23 Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. B. & Robbins, J. (1999). The LearningStrategies Handbook. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

,

25

.

26

1.4.

, , .

. (self-talk), , .

:) (

, , , , , )

) ( , , , , , -, .

27

, , , ,. -

, . . 24:)

(, , ) .

) ( ).

) ( ).

H

24 : , .(2011). . : .

28

. . , 25.

, , . , , , 26., , . , .

25 Cohen, A. D. (1987). Studying learner strategies: How we get information. In A.Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning, 31-40,Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

26 Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1987). Verbal reports on thinking. In C. Faerch &G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research, 24-53. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.

29

, . , , 27.

, . , , . (verbal reports)

, . 28.

27 Chou Hare, V. & Smith, D. C. (1982). Reading to Remember: Studies ofmetacognitive reading skills in elementary school-aged children. Journal ofeducational Research, 75: 157-164.

28 Ericsson, . . & Simon, H. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

30

, . - (self-reports), ,

, . , 29. . , , , , .

.

29 Brown, . D. (1987). Principles of language learning and teaching, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.

31

. , 30. . , , 31.

, , (, , ) .

30 Javeau, Cl, (1996). . : -

31 , . (2000). .: , .. 246-248 Javeau, Cl, (1996). .: - , .. 129.

32

, . .

.

1.

.

2. ,

33

.

3.

,

(.. , )

.

4. ,

.

5. ,

.

6. ,

.

7. , .

8.

: ; ; ; ;; .

9.

34

, .

10.

, .

11. ,

.

12.

.

13.

,

.

..

1. , .

2. ,

35

.

3.

.

4.

, .

5. ,

.

6. .

7. ,

.

8.

.

9.

.

10.

, .

36

11. ,

.

12. ,

() .

13.

, .

14. ,

.

15. ,

.

16.

.

17.

.

18.

.

37

19. .

20.

.

.

1.

.

2.

.

3.

,

.

4.

, ,

.

5.

,

38

.

6. ,

.

7.

, .

8. , ,

, .

9. ,

.

10.

,

,

.

11.

,

.

39

12.

.

, , .

. .

. Powney Watts (1984) , 32.

32 Powney, J. & Watts, M. (1984). Reporting interview: a code of good practice.Research Intelligence, BERA Newsletter, 17.

40

: , , . .

. , , . . . , , 33.

:) ,

)

.

33 Verma, G., & Mallick, K. (2004). . . : . ., .. 245-247.

41

2. :

42

2.1.

, .

2.2.

, , :

.

. . .

(2.3.) .

43

: ..:

:

44

:

45

;

;

;

;

;

;

= !!!

=

=

46

: 2 :

:

.

, , , .

, , .

, .

47

, , .

, . , , . 10 .

:

,

48

, . : ; ; ; .

, , . , .

,

,

49

, , , ... (), .

, (+ )

(+ )(+ ;)

,

, ,

,

;

50

, .

, , . , .

51

: ..:

52

.

.

.

.

= !!! = =

/ /

:

53

.

.

.

.....

...

54

: 2 :

:

.

, .

. . ,

55

. .

:

, . / /; /; ..

56

, / , .. / . 34.

:

.

, ,

34 , , , . .

57

().

, , .

, , . .

58

: ..:

. - :

59

:

....

60

;

;

;

;

/ ;

;

= !!!

=

=

61

: 2 : ,

:

. , ( ).

, , .

. .

62

, . - . ,

(, ..) .

, . , , .. .

:

63

: ..:

.

,

, 10 .

64

. .

:

,

65

;

;

;

;

;

;

.

.

.

66

: 2 :

:

(,)

. ( ).

() (), .

, , .

67

. .

, . , , . 10 .

, , , . , .

, , .

68

, . (

).

:

, , .

69

: ..:

, . , , .

70

1

, 2-3 - .

2

3

5

4

71

. - .

6

7

8

! ; , , .. ......

.

72

.. ..............................................

. - .

, :

-

, ...

73

(,, , )

; -

;;

; ;

; ;

.

74

.

.

.

.

75

: 2 :

:

(,)

. .

, , .

.

76

.

, , . - , ( ).

, ( ). , , .

, , . , . ( ). ,

,

77

.

78

:.. :

; !

1

, ,

100 C

2

, ,15

3

, , ,

4

, ,, ,

5

, ,5

79

6

,

7

,,

8

,,

,

:

80

;

;

; ;

81

;

;

;

.

.

.

.

.

82

: 2 :

:

(,)

(). , . .

, , .

83

. , /. , (). ,

( ). , , ( ). , , .

, , .

84

, . ( ). ,

, .

85

: ..:

.

86

87

.

( );

;

88

; ;

;

;

,

;

; ;

;

;

89

; ,

;

;

.

, ;

..

.

90

: 2

: ( )

:

()

. , .

.

91

. . , ( ) . ( ). ( ).

, .

, . , , .

92

, , , Movie maker. . , .

93

: :

; . , .

8. 130 , 5. 3 . . , , . , ., , .

94

, . .

; ; ;

, .

95

;

(.. ,

, ..);

; ;

, ;

96

: 2 :

:

()

(, , ). , , .

.

.

97

. .

, 1 . .,

2 .

. , .,

.

98

: ..:

; ; ; ; ; .... ; ....

; ; ; ; ; ;

.

; ; ;.....

99

.

.

100

o ;

, ();

(); ;

;

. .

.

.

.

101

: 2 :

:

()

, , . .

/.

. ,

102

. ,

.

( ).

. . . , .

103

, , , , / .

.

104

: ..:

, 1. ; .2. ; ;....3. ;

).).).

.

105

4. , ;

)))

106

, .

100%

;

; / ;

;

;

107

: 2

:

:

()

, . .

. , . , .

108

, .

, , .

109

2.3.

, Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M. Antoniou, P. (2009)35, . , , . :1) T (Orientarion)2) (Structuring)3) (Application)4) (Questioning)5) (Modelling)6) (Management of time)7) (Classroom as a

learning environment)8) (Assessment).

35 Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M. Antoniou, P. (2009). Teacher behaviour andstudents outcomes: Suggestions for research on teacher training and professionaldevelopment. Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (1), 12-23.

110

. . .

:

, .

: ,..:

111

.

, : /

, (.. )

.

:

,

112

( )

.

:

( ).

: ,

113

.

: ( )

-

( ).

: ( )

114

.

:

;

; ;

; , ;

(/);

115

3.

116

3.1.

. , , , .

, :1.

;

2. ;

3. ;

.

117

3.1.1.

. , 36. () () , , (. 1). , , 37, .,

36 Argyle, A. (1996). The experimental study of relationships. In D. Miell & R. Dallos(Eds.), Social Interaction and Personal Relationships (pp. 343-355). Milton Keynes:Open University Press.

37 Petric, B. & Czarl, B. (2003). Validating a Writing. Strategy Questionnaire. System,31(2), 187-215.

118

. , .

1:

1-3

.

.

.

4-13

(2 /)

14-15

. .

, .

119

, , CALLA(Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach). , 38. , , 39. (. 2) , .

38 Kontos, S. & Keyes, L. (1999). An ecobehavioral analysis of early childhoodclassrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 14 (1), 35-50.

39 Wenden, A. (1986). Helping language learners think about learning. EnglishLanguage Teaching Journal, 40(1), 3-9.

120

2: ,

& ,

-

121

&

, , , .

3.1.2.

445 2012-2013 . 222 (49,9%) 223 (50,1%) . .

122

3:

()

77(50,7%)75

(49,3%)152

(68,5%)

42(60,0%)28

(40,0%)70

(31,5%)

119(53,6%)103

(46,4%)222

(100%)

()

66(47,1%)74

(52,9%)140

(62,8%)

52(62,7%)31

(37,3%)83

(37,2%)

118(52,9%)105

(47,1%)223

(100%)

, 129 (, -, , , , ) , (....). 66(51,2%) 63 (48,8%) .

123

3.1.3. ,

(pre-test) (post-test) , , 40, .

41 (2009), :) ,) ,) ,) ) . ,

, :) ,) ,

40 , ., , ., , . & , . (2007). - .-.

41 , . (2009). . : .

124

) )

42,, , :) ,) ,) ) .,

, , :) ()

) ().

.

42 , ., , ., , . & , . (2007). - .-.

125

:) (),) (),) (),) () :) (),) () ) (). (pre-test)

(post-test) S.P.S.S. 18 . Kolmogorov-Smirnov 0.05 (z

126

3.1.4.

Mann-Whitney U,

, , . 4,

.

4:

.. .. Z P

135,03 49,653 -1,520 0,129 127,11 39,868

9,91 4,250 -0,140 0,889 10,26 5,037

1,59 1,650 -0,406 0,685

127

(z=-1,520, p=0,129), (z=-0,140,p=0,889), (z=-0,406, p=0,685), (z=-1,897, p=0,580) (z=-0,406, p=0,685).

( 5) .

5:

1,52 1,671

1,27 1,336 -1,897 0,580 1,52 1,454

1,59 1,650 -0,406 0,685 1,52 1,671

.. .. Z P

91,16 10,856 -1,815 0,070 92,67 8,713

14,42 4,465 -1,830 0,067 15,21 4,072

21,75 4,354 -0,207 0,836 21,85 4,074

128

, (z=-1,81520, p=0,070), (z=-1,830,p=0,067), (z=-0,207, p=-0,836), (z=-0,982,p=0,326), .,

, , (: 6) .

6:

36,17 8,025 -0,982 0,326 37,06 7,418

.. .. Z P

8,38 3,106-1,574 0,115

8,92 2,710

24,86 10,310-0,251 0,801

25,83 8,198

129

(z=-1,574, p=0,115) (z=-0,251, p=0,801) 5%.

, , .

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test,

, , , , . , Mann-Whitney U , ,

130

.

(z=-0,664, p=0,507) (z=-0,240, p=0,215) (: 7). (z=-2,069, p=0,039) (..=10,424,318) (..=9,914,250), (z=-0,619,p=0,536).

7: .

Pre-test Post-test

Z P.. .. .. ..

135,03 49,653 137,45 50,580 -0,619* 0,536 127,11 39,868 126,13 40,976 -0,664* 0,507

9,91 4,250 10,42 4,318 -2,069* 0,039

10,26 5,037 10,55 4,902 - 0,215

131

* .** .

, (: 8) (z=-2,229, p=0,026), (..=137,4550,580). , (z=-2,229, p=0,026).

8:

0,240**

1,59 1,650 1,03 1,234 -7,183** 0,000

1,52 1,671 1,31 1,593 -2,654* 0,008

1,27 1,336 0,74 1,115 -5,605** 0,000

1,52 1,454 1,29 1,321 -3,362* 0,001

1,59 1,650 0,90 1,304 -6,585** 0,000

1,52 1,671 1,31 1,593 -0,932* 0,003

.. .. Z P

132

, , (: 7). (: 8). , (z=-7,881, p=0,000), (z=-5,162, p=0,000) (z=-2,871, p=0,004) .

, , , ,

137,45 50,580 -2,229 0,026 126,13 40,976

10,42 4,3180,108 0,914 10,55 4,902

1,03 1,234 -7,881 0,000 1,31 1,593

0,74 1,115 -5,162 0,000 1,29 1,321

0,90 1,304 -2,871 0,004 1,31 1,593

133

5% (: 9).

9: .

* .

Mann-Whitney U (: 10), (z=-0,506, p=0,613) (z=-1,623, p=0,104).

Pre-test Post-testZ P.. .. .. ..

91,16 10,856 92,65 9,713 -4,323* 0,000

92,67 8,713 92,88 8,504 -2,017* 0,044

14,42 4,465 16,05 3,756 -6,421* 0,000

15,21 4,072 15,46 3,926 -3,157* 0,002

21,75 4,354 23,46 3,542 -6,706* 0,000

21,85 4,074 22,52 4,225 -6,422* 0,000

36,17 8,025 39,51 6,660 -7,624* 0,000

37,06 7,418 37,98 7,480 -5,124* 0,000

134

(z=-2,397, p=0,017). (..=23,463,542) (..=22,524,225).

10:

, , (z=-2,051, p=0,040) . (..=39,516,660) (..=37,987,480). ,

,

.. .. Z P

92,65 9,713-0,506 0,613 92,88 8,504

16,05 3,756 -1,623 0,104 15,46 3,926

23,46 3,542-2,397 0,017 22,52 4,225

39,51 6,660 -2,051 0,040 37,98 7,480

135

5% (: 11).

11: .

* .

(z=-0,310,p=0,756) , (: 12).

Pre-test Post-testZ P.. .. .. ..

8,38 3,106 9,14 2,776 -4,399* 0,000

8,92 2,710 9,33 2,462 -3,968* 0,000

24,86 10,310 24,95 9,907 -0,511* -,609

25,83 8,198 26,11 8,028 -0,673* 0,501

136

12:

, (z=-0,679, p=0,497) .

. Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test, , , (), (), (),

.. .. Z P

9,14 2,776-0,310 0,756

9,33 2,462

24,95 9,907-0,679 0,497

26,11 8,028

137

() (), () ().

13: .

Pre-test Post-test Z pM.O. T.A. M.O. T.A.

.. 82,59 11,804 84,60 10,110 -2,282 ,022.. 83,55 12,685 83,61 11,132 -1,101 ,271

.. 28,91 10,175 35,39 6,478 -5,798 ,000.. 33,17 7,519 33,05 7,587 -1,390 ,165

.. 5,58 2,643 6,98 2,634 -3,824 ,000.. 6,38 2,317 7,48 2,805 -3,874 ,000

.. 15,70 11,016 18,48 8,970 -3,285 ,001.. 19,65 9,543 20,11 9,407 -1,903 ,057

, (z=-5,798,p=0,000), (z=-2,282, p=0,022), (z=-3,824,p=0,000) (z=-3,285, p=0,001). , ,

138

(z=-3,874, p=0,000).

14: .

Pre-test Post-test Z pM.O. T.A. M.O. T.A.

.. 132,77 24,360 145,50 19,634 -4,831 ,000.. 142,82 22,542 144,19 22,415 -,889 ,374

.. 21,27 12,831 25,47 10,283 -4,592 ,000.. 26,03 11,341 27,59 11,282 -6,920 ,000

.. 132,77 24,360 145,50 19,634 -5,789 ,000.. 142,82 22,542 144,19 22,415 -,880 ,379

, (z=-4,831, p=0,000), (z=-4,592, p=0,000) (z=-5,789, p=0,000). , . , ,

139

(z=-6,920, p=0,000).

3.1.5.

. ,

, , , . . , , .

, , ,

140

. .

43, , , 44.

, , .

43 Rose, K. & Kasper, G. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press Kasper, L. F. (1997). Assessing the metacognitivegrowth of ESL student writers. TESL EJ, 3(1), 1-20.

44 Lu, W. J. (2006). Relationship between metacognitive strategies and English writing.Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (9), 25-27 Xu, J. F. & Tang F. (2005).Review of previous research on English writing metacognition in China and abroad.Foreign Language World, (5), 17-23 De La Paz, S. & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitlyteaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle schoolclassrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 291304 Yarrow, F. &Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitiveprompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of EducationalPsychology, 71, 261282

141

, . , , . ,

, . . , , . , . , , ,

142

. , . . , , .. . , . , .,

. . , ,, ,

143

, .

144

Anderson, J. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Argyle, A. (1996). The experimental study of relationships. InD. Miell & R. Dallos (Eds.), Social Interaction andPersonal Relationships (pp. 343-355). Milton Keynes:Open University Press.

Baroudy, I. (2008). Process writing: successful andunsuccessful writers. International Journal of EnglishStudies, 8(2), 43-63.

Brown, . D. (1987). Principles of language learning andteaching, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

, . (2000). . : .

Campbell, R., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, R. & Robinson, W.(2003). Differential Teacher Effectiveness: towards amodel for research and teacher appraisal. OxfordReview of Education, 29 (3), 347-362.

Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language Learning StrategyInstruction: Current Issues and Research. AnnualReview of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130.

Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. B. & Robbins, J.(1999). The Learning Strategies Handbook. White Plains,NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

145

Chamot, A.U. & O' Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning Strategiesin Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Chou Hare, V. & Smith, D. C. (1982). Reading toRemember: Studies of metacognitive reading skills inelementary school-aged children. Journal of educationalResearch, 75: 157-164.

Clark, R. & Ivanic, R. (2013). The politics of writing. NewYork: Routledge.

Cohen, A. D. (1987). Studying learner strategies: How we getinformation. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learnerstrategies in language learning, 31-40, Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Cohen, A. D. (1990). Language learning: insights for learners,teachers and researchers. USA: Newburry HousePublishers.

Creemers, B. P. M. & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical Analysisof the Current Approaches to Modeling EducationalEffectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamicmodel. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,17(3), 347-366.

, ., , . & , . (2011). : . ., . . , . & .

146

(.), 2 , 27-30 2010, 2 (. 69-78). : .

De La Paz, S. & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teachingstrategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction inmiddle school classrooms. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 94, 291304.

Ericsson, . . & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis:Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1987). Verbal reports onthinking. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspectionin second language research, 24-53. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.

Ferrari, M., Bouffard, T. & Rainville, L. (1998). What makes agood writer? Differences in good and poor writers self-regulation of writing. Instructional Science. 26 (6), 473-488.

Gavriilidou, Z. & Psaltou Joycey, A. (2010). Languagelearning strategies: an overview. Journal of AppliedLinguistics, 25, 11-25.

Geladari, A. & Mastrothanasis, K. (2013). The employmentof cognitive and metacognitive strategies in bilingualpupils creative writing. In N. Lavidas, Th. Alexiou & A.M. Sougari (Eds.), Major Trends in Theoretical andApplied Linguistics 3: Selected Papers from the 20th

147

International Symposium on Theoretical and AppliedLinguistics (ISTAL 20) (p.p. 97-113). Poland: Versita.

Goddard, Y. L. & Sendi, C. (2008). Effects of self-monitoringon the narrative and expository writing of four Fourth-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 24(4), 408-433.

Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice ofwriting: An applied linguistic perspective. New York:Longman.

Graham, S. & Harris, K. & Reid, R. (1992). Developing self-regulated learners. Focus on Exceptional Children, 24, 1-16 Harris, K. & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature ofcognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategyconstruction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392-405.

Graham, S. & Harris, K. (1993). Self-regulated strategydevelopment: Helping students with learning problemsdevelop as writers. The Elementary School Journal, 94(2), 169-181.

Graham, S. & Harris, K. (1994). The role and development ofself-regulation in the writing process. In D. Schunk & B.Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning andperformance: Issues and educational applications (p.p.203-228). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Graham, S. & Harris, K. (2000). The role of self-regulationand transcription skills in writing and writingdevelopment. Educational Psychologist, 35, 312.

148

Graham, S. (2006a). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne(Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457-478). Manhawah, New York: Erbaum.

Graham, S. (2006b). Strategy instruction and the teaching ofwriting: A meta-analysis. In Ch. MacArthur, S. Graham& J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp.187-207). New York: Guiford press.

Graham, S., Harris, K. & Olinghouse, N. (2007). Addressingexecutive function difficulties in writing: An examplefrom the Self-Regulated Strategy Development model.In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Executive functioning in education:from theory to practice (pp. 216-236). New York:Guilford.

Griva, E., Tsakiridou, E. & Nihoritou, I. (2009). Study of FLcomposing process and writing strategies employed byyoung learners. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Early Learning ofModern Foreign Languages (pp. 132-148). Bristol:Multilingual Matters.

Hacker, D., Keener, M. & Kircher, J. (2009). Writing isApplied Metacognition. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A.Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition inEducation (pp. 154-172). New York: Routledge.

Harris, K., Graham, S., Brindle, M. & Sandmel, K. (2009).Metacognition and childrens writing. In D. Hacker, J.Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of

149

Metacognition in Education (pp. 131-153). New York:Routledge.

Hsiao, T. Y. & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing theories oflanguage learning strategies: A confirmatory factoranalysis. Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 368-383.

Javeau, Cl, (1996). . : - .

Kagan, S. (1999). Cooperative Learning. (13th edition). N.Y:Resources For Teachers.

Kasper, L. F. (1997). Assessing the metacognitive growth ofESL student writers. TESL EJ, 3(1), 1-20.

Keith, N. & Frese, M. (2005). Self-regulation in errormanagement training: Emotion, control andmetacognition as mediators of performance effects.Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 677-691.

Kontos, S. & Keyes, L. (1999). An ecobehavioral analysis ofearly childhood classrooms. Early Childhood ResearchQuarterly, 14 (1), 35-50.

Kostouli, T. (2009). A sociocultural flamework: Writing associal practice. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley & M.Nystrand (Eds.), The sage handbook of writingdevelopment (pp. 98-116). California: Sage publicationInc.

Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., Antoniou, P. (2009).Teacher behaviour and students outcomes: Suggestionsfor research on teacher training and professional

150

development. Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (1),12-23.

, . (1995). : . , 74, 48-56.

, . (2001). - - - . .

, . (2006). - . . . . . .

. & . (2002). . :.

, . (2005). . : .

, . (2011). -. : .

Lane, K. L., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Weisenbach, J. L.,Brindle, M. & Morphy, P. (2008). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writingperformance of second-grade students with behavioraland writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 41(4), 234-253.

Lu, W. J. (2006). Relationship between metacognitivestrategies and English writing. Foreign Languages andTheir Teaching, (9), 25-27.

151

McCutchen, D. (2006). Cognitive factors in the developmentof childrens writing. In Ch. MacArthur, S. Graham & J.Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp.115-130). New York: Guiford press.

, ., , . & , . (2010). (L1). .... , 22, 25-48.

, . (2009). . : .

, . (2004). .: . .

Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What EveryTeacher should know. New York: Newbury HousePublishers.

Oxford, R. L. (2001). Language learning strategies. In R.Carter, D. Nunan (eds.), The Cambridge guide tospeakers of other languages (pp. 166.-172). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Perfect T. J. & Schwartz B.L. (ed.) (2002). AppliedMetacognition. Cambridge University Press.

Petric, B. & Czarl, B. (2003). Validating a Writing. StrategyQuestionnaire. System, 31(2), 187-215.

152

Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promotingand sustaining self-regulated learning, International.Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.

Powney, J. & Watts, M. (1984). Reporting interview: a code ofgood practice. Research Intelligence, BERA Newsletter,17.

Prior, P. (2008). A sociocultural theory of writing. In Ch.MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbookof writing research (pp. 54-66). New York: Guifordpress.

, ., , ., , . & , .(2007). - .-.

Reshadi, E. & Aidinlou, N. A. (2012). Investigating therelationship between writing metacognitive awarenessand use of cohesiveties in Iranian EFL context. Journalof Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (5), 4699-4705.

Rose, K. & Kasper, G. (2001). Pragmatics in languageteaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Kasper, L. F. (1997). Assessing the metacognitivegrowth of ESL student writers. TESL EJ, 3(1), 1-20.

Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

153

Tribble, Ch. (1997). Writing. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Verma, G., & Mallick, K. (2004). . . : . .

Welch, M. (1992). The PLEASE strategy: A metacognitivelearning strategy for improving the paragraph writing ofstudents with mild disabilities. Learning DisabilityQuarterly, 15, 119128.

Wenden, A. (1986). Helping language learners think aboutlearning. English Language Teaching Journal, 40(1), 3-9.

Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and languagelearning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 515-537.

White, R. & Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. Harlow, Essex:Longman.

Xu, J. F. & Tang F. (2005). Review of previous research onEnglish writing metacognition in China and abroad.Foreign Language World, (5), 17-23.

Xu, J. F. & Tang F. (2005). Review of previous research onEnglish writing metacognition in China and abroad.Foreign Language World, (5), 17-23.

Yanyan, Z. (2010). Investigating the role of metacognitiveknowledge in english writing. HKBU Papers in AppliedLanguage Studies, 14, 25-46.

Yarrow, F. & Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing:The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured

154

peer interaction. British Journal of EducationalPsychology, 71, 261282.

Yarrow, F. & Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing:The effects of metacognitive prompting and structuredpeer interaction. British Journal of EducationalPsychology, 71, 261282

, . (2005). : . ,3, 70-77.

155

/ , , , / Harvard. , management GuglielmoMarconi . . . .

- 1 .. . . .

156

, .

3 .. . , , , . . . : - : , (2010) , (2011).

o

. 2007 , . .

157

10 12 ..... & ...

ISBN:

978-9

60-98

900-8

-3