Stochastic parameterization of dust emission and application to
Dust emission modeling
-
Upload
sagar-parajuli -
Category
Documents
-
view
28 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Dust emission modeling
![Page 1: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Improving dust emission scheme in climate models
- Sagar ParajuliMODIS image on 03/19/2012 (Origin: Afghanistan/Pakistan)
![Page 2: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ScatteringAbsorption
Wind
Creep
Dry/Wet deposition
Dust-cloud interactionCCN/IN
Biogeochemical processes
Longwave back radiation
![Page 3: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Figure 1. Mean MODIS aerosol optical thickness ( 2003-2012) indicating average level of dust concentration in the study area (Middle East and North Africa). The diameter of circle is proportional to the population of the city.
![Page 4: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Existing Dust scheme in CLM: (DEAD1) 1Dust Entrainment and Deposition Model
(1Zender, Bian, & Newman, 2003)
![Page 5: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
CLM dust simulation evaluation
Dataset Temporal res. (year:
2003)
Spatial res.
CLM simulation(atmospheric
forcing: Qian et al. 2006)
Daily 0.9ο ×1.25ο
AERONET AOT at 500nm
15 min Station (Solar Village in
Saudi Arabia)
Level 3 MODIS AOD at 550 nm
Daily and monthly
1ο × 1ο
![Page 6: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
CLM Simulated dust flux
MODIS AOT
![Page 7: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Temporal variations (2003)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0
0.5
1
1.5
AO
T a
t 50
0n
m
Mean daily AERONET AOT at 500nm
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0
2
4
6
8
10x 10
4
Du
st f
lux
(to
ns/
da
y)
CLM4 simulated mean daily dust flux
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec1
2
3
4
5
WS
at
10
m
Mean daily WS at 10m
![Page 8: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Key issues• Current CLM gives the maximum possible dust emission from
bare surface• Threshold friction speed is key in controlling dust flux which is a
function of mainly soil moisture and percentage clay content • Soil moisture variation in dust source region being very low,
percentage clay content mainly modifies threshold friction speed
Given the unavailability of accurate percentage clay content map, the only way to improve dust emission is:
Either use different parameterization for different geomorphological surfaces
Or use erodibility map in constraining the model estimate
![Page 9: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Animation: Mean monthly AOD in the study area for 2012
![Page 10: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Evaluation of the wind data
Description
Spatial res.
Temporal Res.
Data range
References
MODIS Deep Blue AOT at 550 nm
1° × 1°
Daily (01:30 PM local time)
2003-2012
(Hsu et al. 2006)
ERA-Interim Wind Speed
1.5° × 1.5°
6 hourly 2003-2012
(Kalnay et al. 1996)
NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis Wind Speed
2.5° × 2.5°
6 hourly 2003-2012
Uppala et al. 2005)
![Page 11: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Wind speed and AOT at Bodele
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
1
2
3
4
5
6
1000 hPa NCEP Wind Speed (m/s)
Dee
p B
lue
AO
T a
t 550
nm
y = 0.026*x2 - 0.054*x + 0.91R-square = 0.19
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140
1
2
3
4
5
6
1000 hPa ERA-Interim Wind Speed (m/s)
Dee
p B
lue
AO
T a
t 550
nm
y = 0.043*x2 - 0.25*x + 1.1R-square = 0.48
![Page 12: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
0 2 4 6 8 100
2
4
6
8
ERA 10m wind at Mezaira (m/s)
Mez
aira
sta
tion
10m
win
d (m
/s)
R - Square = 0.29
SDstn
/SDera
= 0.84
0 0.5 1 1.50
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Deep Blue AOD at 550nm
AE
RO
NE
T A
OT
at 5
50nm
SDaeronet
/SDmodis
= 0.98
R-square = 0.59
Comparison with ground-based observations
Daily data at 01:30 PM (2003)
6 hourly data (2010)
![Page 13: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Improving the model: use of Erodibility Map
![Page 14: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Proposed erodibility map
(correlation map between Deep Blue AOT and 10m wind (data: 365 observations of 2012)
![Page 15: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Expected improvements:
•Vegetated area with mountainous topography •Agricultural areas
Topographic erodibility map(Ginoux et al. 2001)
![Page 16: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Use of dust source map
• Proposed dust source map can be used to mask non-erodible areas (represented by insignificant correlation in the map)
• Since residence time of dust is relatively longer than the wind persistence time, this method eliminates the false identification of dust sources associated with transported dust
• Monthly erodibility map can be used to account for the dependence of threshold friction speed on vegetation and seasonality
![Page 17: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Proposed geomorphological map
(Bullard et al. 2011)
![Page 18: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Future works
• Implement the developed erodibility in CLM and evaluate the resulting emission
• Use ERA-Interim wind for forcing CLM;
• Look for better percentage clay content map
• Develop geomorphological map from google earth image using image classification algorithm (e.g. maximum likelihood method)
• Integrate geomorphological map into CLM
• Develop dust storm forecasting tool using combination of model and satellite data
![Page 19: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Thank you!
![Page 20: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Existing Model: (DEAD1) Dust Entrainment and Deposition Model
T is a global factor to compensate model’s horizontal and temporal resolution sensitivity = 5 × 10-4
S = 1 (source erodibility factor)
(1Zender, Bian, & Newman, 2003)
![Page 21: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
DEAD cont..
•
•
![Page 22: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
DEAD cont.…
•
•
•
![Page 23: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
•
•
•
•
•
•
DEAD cont.…
![Page 24: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
http://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/gldas/GLDASsoils.php (avilable at .25 and 1 degree)
![Page 25: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 3600.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
Julian Days
Surf
ace
SM (
gm/c
m3)
Soil moisture variation in dust source region
![Page 26: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Soil texture used in GLDAS2/Noah• http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/hydrology/data-
holdings
![Page 27: Dust emission modeling](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022032014/55cf99b3550346d0339ebfb1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Unlike in visible bands, UV surface reflectivity is low and is not affected by albedo
• Non-absorbing aerosols(e.g., sulfate aerosols and sea-salt particles) yield negative AI values. UV-absorbing aerosols (e.g., dust and smoke) yield positive AI values. Clouds yield near-zero values.