du Toit Allsopp Hillier January 2010 - Carleton University · 2 du Toit Allsopp Hillier Carleton...

C A R L E T O N U N I V E R S I T YC A M P U S M A S T E R P L A N

du Toit Allsopp Hillier January 2010

CONTRIBUTORS

Steering Committee

Duncan Watt VP (Finance and Administration) Chair, Steering Committee

Frank Ling Chair, Board Building Program Committee

Barry Hobin Member, Board Building Program Committee

Peter Ricketts Provost and VP (Academic)

Margaret Haines University Librarian

Jerry Tomberlin Dean, Eric Sprott School of Business

John Osborne Dean, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences

John ApSimon Dean, Faculty of Public Affairs, Interim

John Armitage Acting Dean, Faculty of Science, Interim

Rafik Goubran Dean, Faculty of Engineering and Design

Sheryl Boyle Acting Director, Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism

Kendra Apanton Undergraduate Student Representative

Evan Dysart Graduate Student Representative

Suzanne Blanchard Assoc. VP (Student Support Services)

Facilities Management and Planning

Darryl Boyce Assistant VP (Facilities Management and Planning)

Anne Richards Assistant Director, Space Management and Capital Planning

Consultants

Roger du Toit duToit Allsopp Hillier

Catarina Gomes duToit Allsopp Hillier

Jordan Darnell duToit Allsopp Hillier

Eric Charron duToit Allsopp Hillier

Martha Lush Corush Sutherland Wright

John McEwan AECOM

C A R L E T O N U N I V E R S I T Y C A M P U S M A S T E R P L A N

i

N.B. This Report is written as if it has been approved by the Board of Governors. Any apparent intentions or commitments herein will only come into effect if and when the plan has been approved by the Board.

The Executive Summary introduces the plan, lists the planning

principles, and summarises the development capacity of the campus.

The Master Site Plan provides a graphic overview of the plan

proposals.

Plan Anatomy -- Basic Principles presents the essence of the

Master Plan and policy intent of Carleton University about the physical

development of the campus.

Massing Studies provide a site by site investigation into the kind of

development form which would implement the basic principles.

Plan Implementation describes the way in which the plan is intended

to be implemented and maintained over time.

The Planning Base, a sister document, outlines the planning

approach, consultation, Carleton’s Strategic Plan, the planning and

development history of the campus and describes the principal

movement and infrastructure systems

ii du Toit Allsopp Hillier Carleton University Campus Master Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................2

CAMPUS MASTER SITE PLAN ....................................................................................5

PLAN ANATOMY – BASIC PRINCIPLES ....................................................................11

1. Environmental Responsibility ....................................................................12

2. Compact Academic and Research Campus ...............................................13

3. Campus Structure: Streets, Greens, Walks and Tunnels ...........................14

4. Movement ..................................................................................................17

5. Connections to Surroundings ....................................................................22

6. Design Quality ...........................................................................................26

7. Building Organization and Interdependence ..............................................28

8. River Access .............................................................................................29

9. Parking ......................................................................................................30

10. Safety ........................................................................................................31

11. Storm Water Management ........................................................................32

12. Development Priority .................................................................................34

13. Space Management ...................................................................................36

14. North Campus Reserve .............................................................................37

MASSING STUDIES – DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ..................................................39

1. Reinforcing the Main Quad ........................................................................41

Dunton Tower .....................................................................................................41

Main Library .......................................................................................................44

Paterson Hall ......................................................................................................46

Establishing a Campus Entry Quad......................................................................52

2. Additional West Campus Sites ..................................................................54

University Centre Addition ..................................................................................54

Mackenzie Courtyard Infill .................................................................................55

Table of Contents

Carleton University Campus Master Plan iiidu Toit Allsopp Hillier

North Library Road .............................................................................................56

Parking Lot P1 ....................................................................................................57

Social Science Research ....................................................................................58

Herzberg Inco Annex ...........................................................................................59

3. East Campus .............................................................................................60

Site Works Reorganization ...................................................................................60

Alumni Park Backdrop .........................................................................................61

Over-Track Building .............................................................................................62

Street and Quad ..................................................................................................62

Parking Structure ................................................................................................62

4. Mid-Campus ..............................................................................................64

University Drive ..................................................................................................64

Bronson Avenue .................................................................................................64

5. Residential Campus ..................................................................................66

6. North Campus ...........................................................................................68

7. Campus Overview ......................................................................................70

PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ..........................................................................................75

An Approved Plan ...............................................................................................76

Updating the Plan ...............................................................................................76

Supplementary Planning Studies ........................................................................77

Testing Projects against the Plan .........................................................................77

Selecting Sites: A Checklist ................................................................................78

APPENDIX A: STATISTICS ........................................................................................81


1

Executive Summary

The Executive Summary

introduces the plan, lists

the planning principles, and

summarises the development

capacity of the campus.

2 du Toit Allsopp Hillier Carleton University Campus Master Plan

Executive Summary

The purpose of this plan is to set the parameters, policies and directions

for the physical development of the campus – its buildings, landscapes,

movement systems and general infrastructure. It fulfils the Board of

Governors’ policy to update the Carleton University Campus Plan

every five years. It deals with the location and size of buildings without

determining the uses except in a general sense, since these will vary

over time.

The arrangement of buildings and landscapes in the campus is guided by

a set of planning strategies -- principles or policies of the Board -- dealing

with:

1. Environmental responsibility and sustainable development;

2. Compact development within a ten minute class-change;

3. The spatial structure and sense of orientation through the

organization of streets, greens, walks and tunnels;

4. Movement (universal access, pedestrians, bicycles, transit, cars,

and trucks);

5. Connections to surroundings;

6. The design quality of buildings and landscapes;

7. Optimal building organization and interdependence;

8. Access to the river landscape;

9. Parking;

10. Safety;

11. Storm Water management;

12. Development sequence priorities;

13. Space management; and

14. North Campus reserve.

Carleton University Campus Master Plan 3du Toit Allsopp Hillier

The 2004 Plan proposed 14 potential development sites in the academic

and residential areas. Of these, only seven remain. It seemed as if the

campus would soon run out of development capacity. Questions were

posed as to whether the principle governing height should be amended

from mid to high rise buildings; whether new land such as part of the

Federal Experimental Farm across the canal should be sought; and/or

whether the “North 20” was needed for academic use. These questions

are answered here by looking beyond surface parking lots and seemingly

available sites to also include those that are underutilized or occupied by

buildings close to the end of their effective life.

A series of massing studies test the development capacity of twenty

academic and related building sites south of Sunnyside Avenue, six

residential sites, and others in the North Campus. Each site can be

built to a greater or lesser number of floors. A limit of five or six floors

for the majority of buildings in the Academic Campus would yield some

1,900,000 square feet of gross floor area, the mid campus some 480,000

square feet, and the residential campus some 900,000 square feet in total.

Complete development of the grounds at this density, that is following

the existing character of the campus, would double the existing space

on campus today. There are 2,800 residential occupants today with a

capacity to reach 6,000; or more with doubling up of rooms if developed

to 6 and in some cases 10 stories.

Under this scenario, Carleton’s full development capacity, excluding

the North Campus but including all proposed and remaining existing

buildings, is approximately 700 000 square meters or 7.5 million square

feet. If the past expansionary trend line continues, it would take about 50

years to utilize this capacity. Figure 1: Existing and Projected Enrolment and Cumulative GFA (square metres)


5

Campus Master Site Plan

This section provides a graphic

overview of the plan proposals.


Figure 2: Existing Site Plan with building and street names

Legend

Existing Building

Building Under Construction

1 Tory Building2 MacOdrum Library3 Paterson Hall4 Southam Hall5 Renfrew House6 Lanark House7 University Centre8 Gymnasium9 Athletics Building10 Mackenzie Building11 Maintenance Building12 Steacie Building13 Herzberg Laboratories14 Russell House14 Grenville House15 Loeb Building16 H.H.J. Nesbitt Biology Building17 Robertson Hall18 Glengarry House19 Residence Commons20 Parking Garage21 Dunton Tower22 Architecture Building23 St. Patrick’s Building24 Social Science Research Building25 Life Science Research Building26 Stormont-Dundas House27 Minto C.A.S.E.28 Colonel By Child Care Centre29 Carleton Technology & Training Centre30 Leeds House31 Azrieli Theatre32 Azrieli Pavillion33 National Wildlife Research Centre34 Prescott House35 Fieldhouse36 Alumni Hall37 Human Computer Interaction Building38 Visualization & Simulation Building39 Carleton Ice House40 Tennis Centre41 Frontenac House42 Waterfront Project -Canal Site43 Waterfront Project -River Site72 Bronson Substation


The site plan and digital model illustrated in the next two pages show

a campus built to capacity given buildings in the four to six floor range.

Existing buildings on the plan view are toned, proposed are white, vertical

additions are hatched. The model shows general massing, not building

design.

Campus Master Site Plan

Terminology: for ease of description, the campus grounds are divided

into Academic (West and East), Residential, Mid and North Campus

areas.

Figure 3: Names of Campus Areas used in this Report.


Figure 4: Campus Master Site Plan

Legend

Existing Building

Proposed Building

Vertical Expansion


Figure 5: Existing campus, aerial view

Figure 6: Proposed campus, aerial view

The identified sites provide Carleton with a menu of available places

to build. Some of them have grater potential to improve the campus

environment than others. The most transformative potential lies in a group

of opportunities around the Main Quad including a positive connection to

the river, and in the creation of a campus front door entry quad in front of

the University Centre and in the future centre of gravity of the campus.

Figure 7: Transformative potential of Main Quad, river-connection, and Carleton Entry Quad


11

Plan Anatomy-Basic Principles

This section presents the

essence of the Master Plan;

the policy intent of Carleton

University concerning the physical

development of the campus.


Plan Anatomy – Basic Principles1. Environmental Responsibility

Carleton’s strategic goals include strong references to being a designer

and custodian of the future, and acting as stewards of healthier, more

sustainable communities, physical and financial resources.

Carleton promotes a responsible role in sustaining the earth’s ecological

and climatic health through its teaching, research, physical development,

operations and the lifestyle of its students and alumni. To date, an Existing

Building Performance Assessment for waste, energy consumption and

greenhouse gas emissions has been completed.

In its development plan, Carleton will continually seek ways to build,

renew and maintain buildings, infrastructure and landscapes in a way

which conserves resources, land, water and vegetation, reduces energy

use, and limits waste disposal.

For each of these aspects, a Sustainability Committee, supported by a

staff sustainability officer, will establish measures to be met, and review

them regularly to ensure their relevance over time.

For new and renovated buildings, it will use the Green Globe rating

system, at first meeting or exceed the rating of three globes of the

maximum five.


2. Compact Academic and Research Campus

Primary academic, communal, and support facilities will be located within

a ten-minute diameter walking circle. This will require replacement of

under-performing buildings and surface parking; the former with higher

density buildings and the latter with independent and below-building

structures.

Academic research facilities will be located to encourage intra- and inter-

disciplinary contacts, and be associated with their related academic units.

Research space will continue to be located throughout the campus and

particularly within the main academic area.

In the long term, Carleton may consider the possibility of acquiring federal

land on the west side of the canal. The placement of academic facilities

across the canal will shift the centre of gravity to the west and increase

the walking distances in the Academic Campus, as is the case in many

other universities.

Figure 8: Academic and Research Functions will be located close to each other in the main Academic Campus

Figure 9: The placement of academic functions across the canal will shift the centre of gravity to its historic location on the Main Quad

Legend

Existing Building

Proposed Building


3. Campus Structure: Streets, Greens, Walks and Tunnels

Streets, Greens, Walks and Tunnels provide the primary means of

orientation and organization of the campus. The placement, massing,

and uses of buildings will work together to frame and animate open space

while reinforcing spatial structure. The primary circulation systems within

academic buildings will connect with each other and the tunnels to form a

pleasant and cohesive public access structure.

McGill Quad

U of T Central Green, Quads and Streets

University of Virginia Mall

UBC Central Mall and Library Green

Queen's University Streets and Greens

Oxford Quads

Figure 10: Precedents of Campus Structure, showing 10-minute walking circles.


Figure 11: Internal Streets as Structure; Building facades reinforcing streets

Figure 12: External Streets as Structure; Building facades reinforcing civic identity

Figure 13: Greens as Structure; Buildings reinforcing Greens

Figure 14: Walks as Structure; Walks reinforcing Greens


Figure 16: Interconnected Interior Circulation

Figure 15: Tunnels as Structure; Additional locations for daylight and animation

Legend

Existing Tunnel

Proposed Tunnel

Existing Study Area

Proposed Study Area


4. Movement

Transportation Priority: In allocating space and priority to various modes

of movement on campus, pedestrians rank first, bicycles next, followed in

sequence by transit, cars and trucks.

Barrier Free Environment: Carleton is committed to creating a barrier

free environment throughout the campus. The proposed expansion to the

tunnel system and its integration with flanking buildings will improve the

campus' accessibility. Where terrain or other features make these locally

impossible, special services for people with disabilities will be explored.

Streets: Carleton will minimize the use of streets for vehicular traffic

and continue the trend toward greater use by pedestrians and bicycles,

requiring more emphasis on generous sidewalks, street trees and the

animation of flanking building uses. A northern extension of Campus

Avenue to Colonel By Drive and a link to Bronson Avenue north of the

field house may alleviate some of the current rush hour congestion.

University Drive will extend to serve the North Campus. Library road will

terminate at the new Canal Building; the northern section replaced with a

pedestrian path wide enough to take emergency and residential moving

day traffic.

Figure 17: Existing (2012) street system Figure 18: Planned street system

Legend

Secondary Campus Street

Lanes

City Collector

City Arterial

NCC Parkway

Primary Campus Street


Figure 19: Pedestrian Path Hierarchy

Pedestrians have pride of place on the campus. The pedestrian

environment will provide a sense of comfort for users throughout the

day and evening hours with well-lit walkways, shade trees and outdoor

recreational and study seating areas in sheltered locations where

appropriate.

Legend

Key Green Space

Waterfront

Secondary Pathway

Primary Pathway

Indoor Connection

City Pathway


Bicycle accommodation will be further improved, with secure bicycle

parking nodes at key locations throughout the campus, integrated

within building entrances. In the residential campus, parking should

be available for both residents and visitors. The bike route on Campus

Avenue links to the recreational pathway by the canal and to Vincent

Massey Park on the south side of the river, accompanying the rail transit

line.

Figure 20: Cycling routes

Transportation Demand Management (TDM) techniques such as

incentives for multiple vehicle occupancy, increased parking charges and

reduced availability, improved bicycle access and storage will reduce car

use per person. The University will support the City of Ottawa’s continual

improvement of the rail and bus transit initiatives that will enhance the

University’s TDM strategy.

Legend

City Pathway

Primary Cycling Route

Existing Parking

Proposed Parking


Rail Transit is central in the campus. A City of Ottawa initiative to twin-

track the service may enable construction of a combined academic

building and covered station, providing climate-controlled cross-platform

and cross-campus connection.

Bus Transit uses the efficient loop of University Drive and Campus

Avenue, with a series of pick-up and/or drop-off stops and two major ones

on either side of the rail station, forming a transportation hub.

Figure 21: Transit: trains, buses and entry hub

Legend

Bus Route

Light Rail Transit (LRT)

Bus Stop

LRT platforms


Figure 22: Service access

Taxis are accommodated at the proposed Entrance Quad, together

with visitor information. Passengers will be able to wait indoors in the

proposed buildings flanking the Green.

Service and emergency vehicles will use the campus street system

where possible, and use shared pedestrian/service routes where street

access is unavailable. The negative visual impact of service areas will be

mitigated through building and landscape design.


5. Connections to Surroundings

Carleton will work with its neighbours to increase connections between

the campus grounds and their surroundings.

Bronson Avenue needs a greater pedestrian emphasis to overcome its

anti-urban high-speed character. Carleton will encourage and work with

the City of Ottawa to provide a generous tree-lined sidewalk along its

length, with porous connections into the campus. Development within the

campus will seek to establish a greater civic presence through placing

buildings with a sense of address along the street, particularly in the Mid

and North Campus areas. The campus will gain greater presence in this

way, enhanced by special treatment of the important pedestrian entrance

at Brewer Park such as with a gateway feature similar in character to the

one at Sunnyside Avenue, banners, prominent bus stops and architectural

character to the substations in the vicinity.

Figure 23: Bronson Avenue Cross Section


Figure 24: Civic Presence

Legend

Public Realm Improvements

Primary Pathway

Campus Entrances

Building Frontage


Colonel By Drive is both an attractive drive and an important access

to the campus, but because of the dearth of crossings and in places

impenetrable foliage, it is a pedestrian and sometime visual barrier to the

Rideau Canal and arboretum beyond. Carleton will work with the National

Capital Commission and Parks Canada to obtain better pedestrian visual

and physical access, particularly at the north extension of Campus Drive

where a pedestrian crossing associated with campus and public skating-

access parking bring a convergence of public interest to the proposal.

Figure 25: Potential crossing enhancements

Legend

Crossing

Key Crossing of Colonel By Drive

City Recreational Pathway

North-south Campus Cycling Route

Potential Improved Crossing Over Hartwell Locks


The Rideau River flood plain is regulated by the Rideau Valley

Conservation Authority (RVCA), which is interested in reducing

development in the river’s riparian zone. Carleton will work with the RVCA

to balance active use of the amenity of the river bank (such as walks,

seating and patios) for a portion of the river bank, with limits of use to the

majority of the area on campus, as shown below.

Figure 26: Riparian zone and potential human use areas


6. Design Quality

Landscapes and buildings will be of continually improved functional and

aesthetic quality. Building design will favour architectural interest and

life cycle costing over the simple provision of space at low capital cost.

Landscape design will unify the grounds, stimulate social interaction, and

offer delight, comfort, and security.

Buildings on campus are seen by some in the community as an inventory

of architectural styles, interesting evidence of Carleton’s development

history. To many others, there is a perception that while the quality

of the landscape has greatly improved since the last plan, Carleton’s

architectural inventory is “tired”, old and of poor quality. In fact, there are

several buildings of superior contemporary quality, the appreciation of

which is overpowered by the general perception. The Canal and River

buildings now under construction will add to that group. Over time, the

image of the campus will be transformed as the proportion of higher

quality buildings increase and that of older buildings decrease.

The landscape is a unifying element within the campus. Native plant

material predominates, reflecting the natural context of the campus.

Ornamental plant material is selectively utilized to highlight key nodes

and provide accent colour. Reduction of potable water for irrigation

and elimination of pesticide use combined with an active maintenance

program creates a healthy environment. Construction materials will be

consistent, durable and have a quality finish. The principle walkways

are six metres wide and designed to accommodate both the pedestrian

and cyclist. Walkways between buildings and adjacent to roadways

are slightly reduced in width. Sculpture, art and commemorative trees

enhance the experience. The walkways are well-lit, the trees create a

shade canopy during the summer months, and the shrub material is low

to improve visibility and increase the sense of safety in the grounds.

Design

Construction

Operation

1.5%

16.5%

82%

Typical building costs over a 35-year life cycle

Figure 27: Typical building costs over a 35-year life-cycle: The smaller earlier costs greatly influence the larger and later costs. (Source: Consulting Engineers of British Columbia)


Figure 29: Future Inventory of Academic Buildings of Contemporary Architectural Character

Figure 28: Current Inventory of Academic Buildings of Contemporary Architectural Character


7. Building Organization and Interdependence

The more public, student-oriented spaces will be accommodated in the

lower floors of academic buildings, with offices above. Except at the

entrance quad and residential area, height will usually be restricted to six

stories and average five. Communal space for circulation, informal group

and individual study and meeting places will be generous, will link formal

teaching areas and connect directly to each neighbouring building’s

circulation and communal space. Tunnel sections will be opened out to

Figure 31: Idealized building organization

the public uses and be given direct or indirect access to daylight. Outdoor

study and social areas will be incorporated in terraces overlooking the

river and principal greens.

Campus and Faculty Identity: Buildings will be designed to establish

both faculty identity and, in combination with other buildings, a cohesive

campus identity. Designs will seek a lack of isolation by speciality; the

engendering of cross-disciplinary contact; and close connection between

teaching and research. While in the first instance they may be designed

to express a particular faculty identity, they will be organized as a “loose

fit” to encourage a long life of adaptation to alternative academic use.

Figure 30: Building facades have a responsibility for enhancing spatial containment and animation of open space


8. River Access

The relationship with the Rideau River will be improved by making spatial

connections to the main quad and other parts of the campus open space

structure, by orienting buildings to the river with terraces, entrances, atria

and public functions such as food services, and by seeking cooperation

from the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority to improve bank-side

amenities such as paths, benches and seating terraces.

Figure 32: River Access through Greens, terrace outlooks and building addresses.

Legend

Existing Building

Proposed Building

Green Roof Area

Riparian Zone

River Access Zone

City Pathway

Proposed PedestrianBridge


9. Parking

Parking stalls will be provided throughout the campus, increasingly under

cover, while the number per person will decrease over time as car pool

and transit use increase. The majority of surface stalls will be in the North

Campus. The remainder will be under buildings and in parking structures.

The existing garage will be replaced with a larger one, with P3 being a

preferred site. Other structures can take advantage of rail air-rights in the

north campus, once a final decision on electrification has been made.

Since most new buildings will remove surface parking and will require

structured parking on site, Carleton should prepare for the increased

infrastructure costs by gradual and advanced parking charge increases

so that surface lots, while they last, subsidise structured lots.

Figure 33: Parking locations

Legend

Surface Parking

Below grade (multi-level)

Above grade (multi-level)

On-street and Other Small Lots

Lot Spaces Lot Spaces Per FlrP1 113 Under Building P1 106 66P2 243 Under Entry Court P2 192 120P3 159 Parking Garage P3 856 186P4 93 Railway Bldg P4 0P5 604 Surface P5 211P6 982 Under Building P5-A 400 250P7 486 Over track A P6 389 108P8 13 Over track B 425 118P9 651 Over track C 302 84

P10 22 Surface P7 668P11 67 Remains P8 13P12 52 Under Building P8-A 102 64P14 100 Under Building P9 400 250P15 14 Remains P10 22P16 176 Under Bldg + E. Quad P11 320 200P17 95 River Bldg Remains P12 52

Street 94 Remains P14 100Other 107 Replaced P15 0Total 4,071 Remains P16 176

s.m. 2,658,773 s.ft. Remains P17 95Flr Area* 247,000 Spaces/1000s.m. Remains Street 80

Ratio 1.6 Remains? Other 80Total 4,989

Flr Area* 540,000 Spaces/1000Ratio 0.9 of current su

56%

South Campus 156,500Mid Campus 56,500

GFA* Spaces/100sm North Campus 80,000Existing 247,000 1.65 Total new 293,000

Future 540,000 0.92 Existing 247,000%Decrease per sm. 56% 540,000

*Includes Instruction, Learning, Office, Research, UniCentre.Excludes Residential, Res cafeteria, Athletics, Parking

CURRENT FUTURE

Lot Spaces Lot Spaces Per FlrP1 113 Under Building P1 106 66P2 243 Under Entry Court P2 192 120P3 159 Parking Garage P3 856 186P4 93 Railway Bldg P4 0P5 604 Surface P5 211P6 982 Under Building P5-A 400 250P7 486 Over track A P6 389 108P8 13 Over track B 425 118P9 651 Over track C 302 84

P10 22 Surface P7 668P11 67 Remains P8 13P12 52 Under Building P8-A 102 64P14 100 Under Building P9 400 250P15 14 Remains P10 22P16 176 Under Bldg + E. Quad P11 320 200P17 95 River Bldg Remains P12 52

Street 94 Remains P14 100Other 107 Replaced P15 0Total 4,071 Remains P16 176

s.m. 2,658,773 s.ft. Remains P17 95Flr Area* 247,000 Spaces/1000s.m. Remains Street 80

Ratio 1.6 Remains? Other 80Total 4,989

Flr Area* 540,000 Spaces/1000Ratio 0.9 of current su

56%

South Campus 156,500Mid Campus 56,500

GFA* Spaces/100sm North Campus 80,000Existing 247,000 1.65 Total new 293,000

Future 540,000 0.92 Existing 247,000%Decrease per sm. 56% 540,000

*Includes Instruction, Learning, Office, Research, UniCentre.Excludes Residential, Res cafeteria, Athletics, Parking

CURRENT FUTURE


10. Safety

The design and management of buildings, landscapes, and lighting

will promote the reality and perception of personal safety. Enhancing

safety sets up a virtuous circle: the safer the campus feels, the more it

is occupied, the safer it becomes. The sense of personal safety is one

measure of a viable environment, along with and resulting from other

measures such as clarity, legibility, convenience, vitality, and delight.

For this reason, most of the principles in this plan will contribute to the

development of a safer campus.

The exterior lighting system will be designed to reinforce the spatial

structure and organization of the campus, and provide the cues

necessary for orientation and way-finding at night. Glare and contrast

caused by overly bright sources is the most common problem in lighting

design, and causes impaired visibility in the intervals between light

sources. The lighting strategy is to limit light levels to no more than that

required for night vision (which is not much more than full moonlight)

but to distribute the light more evenly, with smooth transitions between

illuminated buildings, roads, walkways, and open spaces so that the eye

can comfortably adapt and to see into shadows.

Lighting can add immeasurably to the night aesthetic of the campus

as well, by subtly illuminating key features. All building entrances and

alcoves or ‘dark corners’ should be softly lit and loading areas should not

be brighter than building entrances. To minimize light pollution, lighting

should be designed to only cast light on what is meant to be lit. Overly

bright lighting which might disturb sleep in residential areas will be

avoided.


11. Storm Water Management

Rainwater flows to the Rideau River over the land surface and via six

piped sewer catchment areas from building roofs and pipe-drained

surfaces. Overland flow currently discharges in two primary locations:

near the rail track crossing and near Bronson Avenue, flowing to those

points along routes marked by blue arrows in the diagram below. The

largest piped catchment outlet is at the Bronson Avenue Bridge, which is

complicated by the fact that it, along with the overland flow at that point,

is within the flood plain and riparian zone.

Water quantity control for the piped system will be provided mainly

through rooftop storage as the north, residential and east campus

develop. Rainwater harvesting for grey water systems, green roofs and

irrigation will also be explored. Infrequent heavy surface flow will be

Figure 34: Overland flow and storm water management ponds

Legend

Direction of Overland Flow

Major Outflow Location

River Flow

Storm Water Pond

Definitions

Flood plain: Areas that are

flooded periodically by the

overflow of rivers. In this case,

the area that statistically has a

1-percent chance of occurring

in any given year.

Overland Flow: Surface flow

of rainwater.

Major Outflow: Point where

surface flow of rainwater enters

the river.

Minor System: System of

underground storm sewers.

Minor Outlet: Point where

storm sewer discharges to the

river.

Riparian Zone: The zone and

habitat along a stream or river.

Dry Pond: Pond that is dry

some parts of the year.

Wet Pond: Pond that has a

permanent pool of water.


Figure 35: Storm sewers and quality/quantity control

interrupted by “dry ponds” in the North Campus, surface parking lots and

the practice field and a small “wet pond” north of the Leeds Residence.

Spring or high river water flooding of low ground along Bronson Avenue

has been held back by the Raven Road berm. The practice field provides

temporary storage for overland flow.

Water quality can be improved, if existing water quality proves

inadequate, in sewer networks 2 to 6 with oil grit separators at discharge

points. Network 1, at Bronson Avenue Bridge, is more complex and would

rely on source control at roofs and parking lots.

Legend

Quantity/Quality Storage

Oil/Grit Separator

River Flow

Minor Outlet

Storm Sewer Catchment Area

Bioswale

Storm Sewer Network Number�


12. Development Priority

In answering which projects might be built sooner than others, priority will

be assessed from:

• a space needs perspective (for academic, residential, administrative

and ancillary functions), as well as from the point of view of energy

savings and facility renewal; and

• a campus-wide perspective, choosing sites which have one or

more of the following attributes: are relatively free of constraints;

contribute to place-making by spatially containing positive open

space; provide a greater sense of river access; help connect the

east and west campus; and animate the tunnels.

Figure 36: Clear site selection priority

Figure 37: Place-making site selection priority

See Plan Implementation,

Selecting Sites: A Checklist on

page 78.


Figure 38: River connection site selection priority

Figure 39: Tunnel animation site selection priority

Figure 40: East-West campus connection site selection priority

Figure 41: Bronson Avenue enhancements site selection priority


13. Space Management

In meeting space needs, the University will emphasize consolidation over

expansion. The most efficient utilization of existing space has first priority,

followed in sequence by renovation of existing space, additions or infill

development, replacement of buildings close to end of life and finally on

one of the new sites identified in the Master Site Plan.

Over the life of a building, it will see several changes of use. Its

programming and subsequent design will therefore aim for loose fit to

encourage long life, so that later uses fit more readily into the building

frame. The most likely practical effect of this approach will be a strong

and generic circulation structure as the primary organising feature of the

building.

Generic functions such as central classrooms, communal, group and

casual study space and student services will occur throughout the

campus but will congregate in greater intensity in central locations,

whereas faculty and research buildings of a specialized nature will find

places further out.

Figure 42: Generic and specialised building locations


14. North Campus Reserve

The North Campus is a short and midterm resource as a way to postpone

some (but not all) of the need to construct structured parking, and a

long term resource for academic use once the rest of the campus is fully

developed. Alternatively, if a strong need arises, it could be developed for

land-consuming uses affiliated with the university such as a research park

or major cultural facility. This will require a full site infrastructure plan and

should only be undertaken with a clear understanding of how the whole

site would be developed.

Figure 43: Mid Term use of North Campus as Parking Resource

Figure 44: A bioswale (a.k.a. biofilter) is a planted swale with an underground gravel trench that filters and stores rainwater (Credit: Schollen & Company)


Massing Studies Development Potential

39

This section provides a site-by-

site investigation into the kind

of development form which

would implement the strategies

contained in the previous section.


Figure 45: The Main Quad and surrounding buildings - Proposed Plan


Figure 46: Main Quad and surrounding buildings; Existing aerial view

Reinforcing the Main Quad1. Dunton Tower

The Dunton Tower provides strong identification of the campus from a

distance, but is a problematic academic building. The way that it meets

the ground at the Main Quad does not contribute particularly well to

animating or spatially containing the quad. As shown on the following

two pages, reworking the base three floors, infilling between the Azrieli

Pavilion and extending westward and forward, would greatly improve

the frontage to the quad. Bringing the entrance to the side will allow a

more efficient layout of offices and classrooms in the interior. Bringing

the front face forward permits an opening out of the tunnel below, adding

borrowed daylit casual study and meeting space.


Figure 48: Dunton Podium; Cross section

Figure 47: View of Dunton Podium from Main Quad


Figure 49: Dunton Podium; Tunnel plan Figure 50: Dunton Podium; Second and third level plan

Figure 51: Dunton Podium; Quad level plan Figure 52: Dunton Podium; Roof plan


2. Main Library

The campus community has a poor opinion of the Library exterior. Some

additional space and a superior architectural treatment can be obtained

by adding a new facade forward, as was done with the Winnipeg

Centennial Library. It will animate the quad and bring additional daylight

to the tunnel and all other levels. Extending the addition northward over

the loading dock will enclose and hide an eyesore, add library space, and

improve views from the interior. There is vertical expansion capacity of

two floors over the rear wing of the Library.Figure 53: Aerial view of Library and Dunton Podium showing spatial relationship with quad

Figure 54: View of Library and Dunton Podium from Main Quad


Figure 55: Winnipeg Centennial Library

Figure 57: Library addition; Cross section

Figure 58: Library addition; Vertical expansion at rear

Figure 56: Winnipeg Centennial Library Interior


3. Paterson Hall

Paterson Hall, one of the first buildings on campus, is in need of a

complete upgrade or replacement. It currently occupies a large amount

of land at a low density. Replacement of Paterson Hall and later the Life

Sciences Research Building, another extremely inefficient use of land and

on valuable river frontage, would allow a dramatic increase of academic

space in the heart of the campus and a dramatic reorientation of the

campus to the river, which has been a longstanding goal of repeated

campus plans since the 1990s. The slope of land further permits access

from the quad to extend into the middle floors, increasing the range of

stair access greater than the normal 3-floor limit.

The primary means of connecting to the river landscape will be through

a generous green linear court flanked by buildings. It would descend in

two steps, each over a tunnel section which opens out to daylight and the

view as it crosses the court. Interior “colonnades” could flank the court.

Garden terraces would provide outdoor space at several levels to take

advantage of river views.

Figure 59: Paterson Hall and Main Quad; Existing aerial view


Figure 60: Paterson Hall and Main Quad; Model of complete development


Figure 63: Paterson Hall and Main Quad; Phase 2


Figure 61: Paterson Hall and Main Quad; Model of existing aerial view



Figure 65: Paterson Hall and Main Quad; Complete


Figure 66: Paterson Hall and Main Quad; River view

Figure 67: Paterson Hall and Main Quad; Cross Section (two-pages)


Figure 68: Paterson Hall and Main Quad; View to River


4. Establishing a Campus Entry Quad

The 2004 Plan proposed a new entry quad on Lot P2, flanked by

supporting buildings including an extension of the University Centre.

The University Centre facade has since been completed. Two flanking

buildings, the quad and underground parking remain to be done.

The north building spans the tunnel intersection between residences, east

and west campuses. There is great opportunity for bringing borrowed

daylight into the tunnels and, as importantly, to improve the sense of

orientation within the tunnel system with additional entrances and views

to the outside world. Tunnel additions servicing the buildings will also be

designed as part of the public space. The south building provides the

access to parking under the two buildings and the quad.

Figure 69: Lot P2; Existing aerial view Figure 70: Entry Quad; Plan


Figure 72: Entry Quad; View from North East

Figure 71: Entry Quad; View from East


Additional West Campus Sites

Figure 75: University Centre; View from South East

Figure 74: University Centre; PlanFigure 73: University Centre; Existing aerial view

University Centre Addition

As the university grows, additional communal space may be needed,

which can be added to the south side of the University Centre. This would

help animate the adjoining relatively large but presently unanimated open

space to the south.


Mackenzie Courtyard Infill

The Mackenzie courtyard is not a successful gathering space. Interior

connections between the four pods are confusing. Both issues can be

resolved by infilling. Generous public space for study and discussion on

the ground floor could form the base of a perimeter atrium providing a

prospect for the existing windows to the courtyard and outlook for a four

storey core of classroom and office space. This is served on the upper

levels with walkways spanning the atrium and connecting the pods.

Figure 78: Ground Floor PlanFigure 76: Mackenzie Complex; Existing aerial view

Figure 77: Infill seen from south east

Figure 79: Upper Floor Plans


Figure 81: North Library Road; View from South East

Figure 80: North Library Road; Existing aerial view

North Library Road

The closure of Library Road and its replacement with a more land-efficient

path system that can also take emergency vehicles would provide

sufficient site area for an academic building.


Parking Lot P1

Development of Parking Lot P1 offers the opportunity for overlook across

the canal and into the Federal Experimental Farm. Parking beneath

the building would use the existing ramp into parking under the Library

Annex.

Figure 82: Lot P1; Existing aerial view

Figure 83: Lot P1; Plan

Figure 84: View from West


Social Science Research

The Social Research building is small, of temporary construction and

occupies a potentially large site on the valley floor. A replacement could

provide a greater inventory of space and make a contribution to the

campus’ river orientation with outlook terraces and green forecourt.

Figure 85: Social Science Research; Existing aerial view

Figure 86: Social Science Research; Plan

Figure 87: Social Science Research; Cross section

Figure 88: View from South West


Herzberg Inco Annex

The Inco Annex on Herzberg is constructed to take an additional two

floors.

Figure 90: Inco Annex; View from South East

Figure 89: Inco Annex; Existing Aerial


East CampusSite Works Reorganization

On the East Campus, three low density or end-of-life buildings and three

surface parking lots offer the opportunity to increase land utilization.

The Maintenance Building and yard, once on the edge of the academic

group, now increasingly in the central zone, takes up a large space in

now valuable real estate. The Day care Centre is in a similar situation, and

could be replaced within a larger project here or in the residential area.

The parking structure is near the end of its maintainable life. Replacing

these three would free up a large area for redevelopment. The heating

plant, however, would stay because of the great cost of replacement.

The cross-campus walk currently winds through this territory. The drive

into the service yard is now a fair distance from the building. Straightening

of the path and bringing the drive closer to the heating plant will allow

more effective subdivision structure to the area.

Figure 91: Existing alignment of cross campus path and service yard access

Figure 92: Realigned cross campus path and service yard access

Figure 93: East Campus; Existing aerial view


Alumni Park Backdrop

A site in front of the garage backing up Alumni Park provides the

opportunity to animate the park with community uses on the ground floor

and overlook terraces on upper floors. It can also improve connection

between the east and west campuses via a new southern tunnel; an

interior link which is presently only possible via a tortuous northern route.

If built before the demolition of the parking structure, it would act as a

visual buffer to the unsightly garage.

Figure 97: Alumni Park backdrop; Cross section

Figure 95: Alumni Park Backdrop; Existing Aerial

Figure 96: Alumni Park backdrop; View from south west

Figure 94: Alumni Park Backdrop; Plan


Over-Track Building

If the O-Train tracks are doubled as previously planned, there is the

opportunity to utilise track air rights with a building encompassing the

station, straddling the tracks and helping to connect east and west

campus. In the mean time, a first phase could be built on the east side,

with the potential to be connected to a western wing at a later date.

Street and Quad

The primary organising devices will be the street and a new quad flanked

by buildings facing it and providing communal uses at ground level.

University drive, also flanked and animated by new buildings will change

character as a more urban and multi-use vehicle/bicycle/pedestrian

corridor.

Parking Structure

A new and larger parking structure is shown on lot P3 to help replace

reasonably close car accessibility to the academic campus.

Figure 98: East campus; Plan once completed


Figure 99: East campus; View from south west

Figure 100: East campus; View from south east


Mid-Campus

Figure 102: Mid Campus; Existing aerial view Figure 103: Mid Campus; Plan

University Drive

The plan proposes that the Maintenance Yard be relocated from the east

campus to the tennis bubble site, and backed by a 3,000 seat seating

structure facing the playing field, with change rooms below. To the north

is a site suitable for an institution affiliated with university programs but

not requiring substantial student class-change requirements.

Bronson Avenue

A larger site for similar institutional use, or for athletic expansion, faces

Bronson Avenue, giving greater Carleton presence to the outside world.

The road serving the mid campus buildings and parking is also extended

to Bronson, providing right-hand turn congestion relief at rush hours. The

streetscape is given greater pedestrian emphasis with a wider tree-flanked

sidewalk and an entrance to the building. The Brewer Park crossing is

given greater visual importance with gateway treatment.

Figure 101: Mid Campus; Crossing at Brewer Park


Figure 104: Mid Campus; View from north east

Figure 105: Mid Campus; View from south west


Residential CampusThe residential campus will grow northward, structured around an

extended Campus Avenue and the central walk. The layout shown sets

up a series of courtyards and a streetscape of flanking buildings along

Campus Avenue.

Figure 106: Residential Campus; Existing aerial view


Figure 107: Residential Campus; Plan

Figure 108: Residential Campus; View from south


North Campus

The north campus represents a midterm surface parking resource and a

valuable long term land bank for presently undetermined development.

Shown below is a research campus organised around a central green

and roadway together with surface and structured parking. Buildings

fronting Bronson Avenue engage the street and provide an urban and

greater pedestrian environment to it, in the process establishing a greater

civic presence to the university.

Figure 109: North Campus; Existing aerial view

Figure 110: North Campus; View from south


Figure 111: North Campus; Mid Term Plan

Figure 112: North Campus; Long Term Plan


Figure 113: Campus Overview; Elevation Looking West Along Bronson Avenue

Figure 114: Campus Overview; Elevation Looking North Along River

Campus Overview

Figure 115: Campus Overview; Elevation Looking West


Figure 116 : Campus Overview; Aerial


75

Plan Implementation

This section describes the way in

which the plan is intended to be

implemented and maintained over

time.


Plan ImplementationAn Approved Plan

The Campus Master Plan (is) approved as University policy by the Board

of Governors.

The Department of Facilities Management and Planning will ensure that

every project is measured against the Campus Master Plan at all stages

of the Project Development Process.

Updating the Plan

In order to respond to changing needs over time, the plan will be evolve

through amendments as necessary and updates every five years.

Plan Amendment: All projects must follow the principles of the

Plan, or else an amendment is purposely made. The Assistant Vice-

President (Facilities Management and Planning) will review and advise

as to whether a proposed project is consistent with the Plan, and will

propose whether a major or minor amendment should be made. Major

amendments – when the change would significantly affect the university

communal interest or the quality of the campus environment – will

reintroduce Steering Committee and campus community participation and

must be approved by the Board of Governors. Minor amendments would

be approved by the Vice-President (Finance and Administration), who will

report the changes to the Building Program Committee of the Board of

Governors and the campus community once made.

Plan Monitoring: Each year, a report on any measures taken to

implement the Plan is made to the Building Program Committee of the

Board of Governors.

General Updates: The Plan will be publicly reviewed at five year

intervals, and approved by the Board of Governors. The principles and

demonstration will be reconsidered, and accumulated amendments

incorporated.


Supplementary Planning Studies

Supplementary planning studies (such as Storm Water Management,

Space Management and Environmental Sustainability) should be formally

approved as sub-sets of the Campus Master Plan, and thus have the

status of policy. If parts of a supplementary plan contradict the Plan and

the contradiction is justifiable and desirable, and if this occurs in between

the five-year general reviews, a plan amendment is required. If the timing

coincides with that of the general review, the supplementary plan can be

affirmed as part of that review.

Testing Projects against the Plan

The Assistant Vice-President (Facilities Management and Planning) or

designate (The Campus Plan Administrator) tests all projects against the

Plan at all stages, and reports consistency or otherwise to the Board.

When a project is identified, a site in the Plan is selected. An important

criterion is how the project’s program and location will contribute to the

needs of campus as a whole, as well as to the needs of the specific

group of users, by meeting a majority of planning principles.

During schematic design, the Plan’s principles and demonstration provide

guidance, and measures for establishing compliance.

Each submission for approval at the Board’s Building Program Committee

includes a report on the project check against the Plan.


Selecting Sites: A Checklist

This plan provides guidance for site selection is provided throughout this

report. The most relevant points are summarised here, with references to

the source in the plan. The palette of sites from which a selection can be

made are contained in the Massing Studies section.

1.Building type: If an academic function, is it within the Academic

Campus? See Strategy 2, Compact Academic and Research Campus. If

an athletic or non-academic function but related to university programs,

is it within the Mid Campus? If a residential function, is it within the

Residential Campus?

2.Program size: how closely does the size of building match the size of

site? If a potential site can accommodate a greater program, can it be

subdivided? See Massing Studies and Appendix A: Statistics.

3.Programmatic relationships: How closely connected is the site to

related programs for ease of student and faculty interchange?

4.Space management: Can the program be met without building afresh

on a new site? See Strategy 14, Space Management.

5.Contribution to spatial structure: How can the program and building

type enhance the spatial structure of the campus? See Strategy 3,

Campus structure and Strategy 12, Development Priority.

6.Movement: How would development enhance movement priorities?

See Strategy 4, Movement.

7.Connections: How would development encourage connections and

presence to Bronson Avenue, the Rideau River and Massey Park, and the

Canal and Arboretum? See Strategies 5, Connections to Surroundings; 8,

River Access; and 12, Development Priority.

8.Parking: Can the budget accommodate the added cost of structured

parking? See Strategy 9, Parking.

9.Development priority: How well can the site and program meet

campus-wide development priorities? See Strategy 12.

10.Cost: What is the comparative cost for developing the site for new

infrastructure, loss of parking, need to build structured parking, removal

of buildings, etc.


Figure 118: Main Quad Revitalization seen from the south.

Figure 117: Entry Quad seen from the east with Paterson Hall replacement in background.

The greatest transformation of the physical environment of the campus will come from the completion of two

projects: the Entry Quad and flanking buildings, and the Main Quad Revitalization including Dunton Tower

Base, Library Front and Paterson Hall replacement.


81

Appendix A: Statistics

This appendix provides the gross

floor areas of the massing models

presented in this plan document.


Figure 119: Key Map for New Building Statistics

Academic Campus:

Legend

Core Area

Infill

North Campus

Vertical Expansion

I1

Mid CampusM1

C1

N1

Residential CampusR1

V1


Building Massing Statistics

I1. Dunton Tower Infill I2. Library Infill I3. UniCentre ExpansionFlrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 1,818 19,569 1 813 8,751 1 590 6,3512 1,103 11,873 2 530 5,705 2 514 5,5333 1,130 12,163 3 530 5,7054 1,112 11,969 4 530 5,705

5 530 5,7055,163 55,574 2,933 31,571 1,104 11,883

I4. McKenzie Infill V1. Library Expansion V2. Herzberg AnnexFlrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 1,297 13,961 1 2,105 22,658 1 536 5,7692 363 3,907 2 2,105 22,658 2 536 5,7693 363 3,907

2,023 21,775 4,210 45,316 1,072 11,539

Building Expansions 16,505 Area M2

177,658 Area s.f.

C1. Paterson Replacem't C2. L.S.R. Replacement C3. Parking Lot 1Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 4,355 46,877 1 2,035 21,905 1 2,273 24,4662 4,355 46,877 2 2,035 21,905 2 1,716 18,4713 4,355 46,877 3 2,035 21,905 3 1,638 17,6314 4,355 46,877 4 2,035 21,905 4 1,065 11,4645 4,355 46,877 5 2,035 21,905 5 1,065 11,4646 3,653 39,321 6 1,903 20,484 6 1,065 11,4647 1,743 18,761 7 909 9,784

27,171 292,466 12,987 139,791 8,822 94,959

C4. S.S.R. Replacement C5. Parking Lot 2 N. C6. Parking Lot 2 S.Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 2,566 27,620 1 2,253 24,251 1 1,847 19,8812 2,404 25,876 2 2,253 24,251 2 1,847 19,8813 2,255 24,273 3 2,253 24,251 3 1,847 19,8814 2,118 22,798 4 1,766 19,009 4 1,135 12,2175 1,493 16,071 5 1,766 19,009 5 1,135 12,2176 525 5,651 6 641 6,900 6 625 6,727

7 641 6,900 7 625 6,7278 641 6,900 8 625 6,727

11,361 122,289 12,214 131,470 9,686 104,259



C7. Library Road C8. Over Rail C9. Parking Lot 4Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 2,070 22,281 1 4,692 50,504 1 2,535 27,2872 2,070 22,281 2 5,166 55,606 2 2,535 27,2873 1,732 18,643 3 5,166 55,606 3 2,535 27,2874 1,798 19,354 4 3,364 36,210 4 1,986 21,3775 792 8,525 5 3,130 33,691 5 1,986 21,377

6 792 8,5258,462 91,084 21,518 231,618 12,369 133,139

C10. Old Gym+Daycare C11. Parking Lot 11 C12. Maintenance Repl'tFlrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 3,761 40,483 1 2,502 26,931 1 1,110 11,9482 3,761 40,483 2 2,502 26,931 2 1,110 11,9483 3,761 40,483 3 2,502 26,931 3 1,110 11,9484 931 10,021 4 1,920 20,667 4 810 8,7195 931 10,021 5 1,488 16,017 5 810 8,719

6 1,008 10,85013,145 141,492 11,922 128,327 4,950 53,281

C13. Maintenance Repl't C14. Garage Replacem't C15. Alumni Park BackFlrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 1,710 18,406 1 2,714 29,213 1 1,348 14,5102 1,710 18,406 2 2,714 29,213 2 1,005 10,8183 1,710 18,406 3 2,714 29,213 3 881 9,4834 774 8,331 4 1,350 14,531 4 685 7,3735 774 8,331 5 774 8,331 5 685 7,373

6,678 71,881 10,266 110,502 4,604 49,557

West Campus 90,703 Area M2 East Campus 85,452 Area M2

976,319 Area s.f. 919,798 Area s.f.

Total Core 176,155 Area M2

1,896,117 Area s.f.

M1. Tennis Replacement M2. Bronson Frontage M3. New MaintenanceFlrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 2,637 28,384 1 7,089 76,305 1 2,151 23,1532 2,637 28,384 2 6,669 71,785 2 2,151 23,1533 2,637 28,384 3 4,809 51,764 3 2,151 23,1534 900 9,688 4 4,809 51,764 4 900 9,6885 900 9,688 5 4,809 51,764 5 900 9,688

6 2,049 22,0559,711 104,528 30,234 325,436 8,253 88,835

Mid campus 48,198 Area M2

518,799 Area s.f.



N1. North Campus N2. North Campus N3. North CampusFlrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 1,374 14,790 1 1,423 15,317 1 1,403 15,1022 1,374 14,790 2 1,423 15,317 2 1,403 15,1023 1,374 14,790 3 1,423 15,317 3 1,403 15,1024 1,374 14,790 4 1,423 15,317 4 1,403 15,102

5,496 59,158 5,692 61,268 5,612 60,407


1 1,402 15,091 1 1,670 17,976 1 2,762 29,7302 1,402 15,091 2 1,670 17,976 2 2,762 29,7303 1,402 15,091 3 1,670 17,976 3 2,522 27,1474 1,402 15,091 4 1,670 17,976 4 2,522 27,147

5 240 2,5836 240 2,583

5,608 60,364 6,680 71,903 11,048 118,920


1 2,333 25,112 1 1,278 13,756 1 1,298 13,9722 2,333 25,112 2 1,278 13,756 2 1,298 13,9723 2,333 25,112 3 1,278 13,756 3 1,298 13,9724 2,333 25,112 4 1,278 13,756 4 1,298 13,9725 662 7,1266 662 7,126

10,656 114,700 5,112 55,025 5,192 55,886

N10. North Campus N11. North CampusFlrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 1,260 13,563 1 2,019 21,7322 1,260 13,563 2 2,019 21,7323 1,260 13,563 3 2,019 21,7324 1,260 13,563 4 2,019 21,732

5 794 8,5476 794 8,547

5,040 54,250 9,664 104,022

North Campus 75,800 Area M2

815,904 Area s.f.



R1. Residence R3. Residence R4. ResidenceFlrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 1,563 16,824 1 1,823 19,623 1 1,823 19,6232 1,826 19,655 2 1,823 19,623 2 1,823 19,6233 1,563 16,824 3 1,823 19,623 3 1,823 19,6234 1,594 17,158 4 1,823 19,623 4 1,823 19,6235 1,591 17,125 5 1,823 19,623 5 1,823 19,6236 1,579 16,996 6 1,823 19,623 6 1,823 19,6237 1,588 17,0938 1,588 17,093 10,938 117,736 10,938 117,7369 1,588 17,093

10 1,588 17,09316,068 172,955

R5. Residence R6. Residence R7. ResidenceFlrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 1,823 19,623 1 1,823 19,623 1 1,823 19,6232 1,823 19,623 2 1,823 19,623 2 1,823 19,6233 1,823 19,623 3 1,823 19,623 3 1,823 19,6233 1,823 19,623 4 1,823 19,623 4 1,823 19,6235 1,823 19,623 5 1,823 19,623 5 1,823 19,6236 1,823 19,623 6 1,823 19,623 6 1,823 19,623

10,938 117,736 10,938 117,736 10,938 117,736

R8. Residence+Commons R2. Res. Commons AdditionFlrs Area M2 Area s.f. Flrs Area M2 Area s.f.

1 3,730 40,149 1 1,759 18,9342 3,730 40,149 2 1,759 18,9343 2,144 23,0784 2,144 23,078 3,518 37,8675 2,144 23,0786 2,144 23,0787 2,144 23,078 Residential Campus 98,888 Area M2

8 2,144 23,078 1,064,422 Area s.f.9 2,144 23,078

10 2,144 23,078 TOTAL CAMPUS FLOOR AREA AND DENSITY24,612 264,921 Total New Buildings 415,546 Area M2

4,472,900 Area s.f.Buildings Removed Area M2

Soc.Sci.Res.Bldg. 1,335 Existing Remaining Bldgs 360,399 Area M2

Paterson Hall 7,431 3,879,303 Area s.f.Life Sciences 2,350

Daycare 526 Grand Total 775,945 Area M2

Maintenance 4,072 8,352,202 Area s.f.Gymnasium 2,616

Tennis Bubble 3,345 Approximate Land Area 597,122 Area M2

Parking Garage 23,862 Density 1.30 FSITotal Removed 45,537

Current Area (2012) 405,936Future Remaining 360,399

du Toit Allsopp Hillier January 2010 - Carleton University · 2 du Toit Allsopp Hillier Carleton...

Documents

Transcript of du Toit Allsopp Hillier January 2010 - Carleton University · 2 du Toit Allsopp Hillier Carleton...