Rupublic of the PhilippinesDeIJ,arbll'l~JnItof Interior and Local Government

NA:'f1It')NAL POLICE COMMISSIONNATIONAL IiEADQI.IAI~TERS, PHIL~PPINE NATIONAL POLICEDIRECTOJ~A TA: FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Camp Crame,Quezon City

MEMORANDUM

FOR : All Concerned

FROM :TAJDRD

SUBJECT : Pol' cy GUii!ll4~linesin the Conduct of PostQ1.1lalificati(llDlEvaluation and Acceptance Tests forNi~~t VisiOlIllScope (Monocular).. .

DATE : Decemberl J, 2007==================M-=====U~IU ••========================================-=REFERENCES:

A. Memoranda from 'J[DRD re Test and Evaluation dated November 2,2004 and January 2,2005 respectively; ".

B. UESB Resolution No. 2004-36, Rationalization of the 'Conduct of PNP Test andEvaluation approved and adopted on December 23, 2004;

C. Memo from TDRD, The Procurement System in the PNP dated October l3, 2004;D. Memorandum Circular 2004··05, Policy in the Conduct of Eligibility and

Acceptance Tests fall' Ordnance Equipment and Supplies.

PURPOSE:

To provide policy guidelines, procedures and standards in the conduct of EligibilitylPostBid Evaluation and Aoeeptance Tests for equipments falling under the Clothing andCriminalistics Equipment bivision ofDRD.

ORGANIZATION:

The technical evaluation will be conducted by a Technical Team headed by the Chief,Clothing and Criminalistius Equipment Division, Directorate for Research and Development or arepresentative designated, by the: Director, DRD. The members will come from otherDirectorates, the end user, COA, NAPOLCOM (optional) and other selected units of the PNP asprovided for in the existing rules and regulations governing the conduct of T & E for PNPequipment.

POLICY GUIDELINES: .~'-

A. The Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) shall cause the conduct of EligibilitylPostBid Evaluation and Acceptance Tests of the item' as required in every procurementactivity; .

B. The DRD win determine the quantity of samples to be submitted for Test andEvaluation;

C. The DRD shall, receive and issue receipts for the samples from proponents and shalldeposit same t(~the supply custodian of the concerned section; .

J

"

/

D. The Technical j eam shall conduct visual inspection on the sample unit(s) and decidewhether to accept or reject before the functional examination. If upon visualexamination and evaluation, the submitted item is found non-conforming with thestandard specifieations, DO further testing shall be conducted. Test and EvaluationReport will be ferwardedto HAC its corresponding memorandum;

E. NO TrademarB~TM shall mean non-acceptance of the sample(s);

F. Samples will be forwarded to any Qualified Testing Iristitution thru a letter requestfor destructive testing with the presence of the proponent(s) and other concernedunits;

G. No partial Test and Evaluation Report shall be issued by DRD;

H. The DRD Technical TeaJrn{i~)will oversee the conduct of the Test at the selectedtesting places. '[be Test Shall be witnessed by representatives from other concernedoffices/units of the PNP and proponents. A video: coverage/photograph on theconduct of test will be taken;

I. The DRD may conduct Test and Evaluation of the item which will be termed asProduct Evalu4~tion even in the absence of any procurement program and. directivefrom the PNP E!AC. The product evaluation result shall only be used as reference forany recommem,ratiolll which DRD may deem appropriate.

J. The DRD Technical Team shall brief and furnish all the proponents copies of thepolicy guidelines and. parameters to be used in the test.;

K. The Test Parameters may 110tbe conducted one after the other. Any problem arisingfrom a particular Test Parameter shall be made in writing addressed to Chairman,BAC (attn: Seeretariat). Failure on the part of any affected proponents to file orregister complaintswithin three (3) days after the conduct of Test and Evaluationshall be deemed agreement to the overall conduct of the test;

L. All testing fees, needed equipment and other incidental expenses for use in the Testand Evaluation shall be 'borne by the requesting proponents;

M. The proponents I; shall execute a waiver that the DRD Technical Team shall not beheld liable for 'whatsoever damage/s incurred by anybody to the item being usedduring the conduct of Test and Evaluation;

N. The Test and H/aluation may be postponed and re-scheduled by the DRD TechnicalTeam in the al sence of the Proponent or its authorized representative. A writtenrequest for rescheduling duly approved by The Director for Research andDevelopment (1~DRD)will determine its resumption;

O. The Eligibility/Post Qualification/ Acceptance Test and Evaluation results of the itemshall be valid only for a particular procurement period. A report that contains thefmdings, conclusion and recommendations whether the sample is conforming or not

~t,

:(,"

conforming based 0]1 NAPOLCOM-Apprpved Standard Specifications and theapproved test and evaluation procedures used will be submitted to BAC thru TDRD;

P. Proponents whose samples have failed the Eligibility/Post Qualification! AcceptanceTest and Evaluation may request for a reconsideration addressed to Chairman, BAC.Result of the retest shall be used in the next procurement activity and shall not bebinding in the current procurement program;

Q. Sample/prototype unius) used in the testing will be a part of the delivery to the PNPin case the company wins the bidding.

TEST PARAMETERS F'OR mcar VISION SCOPE (MONOCULAR):'"

Phase I - Visual and Dimensiena! Inspection.PNP SPECIFICATIONS

CLASS

(UESB Resolution 21()06-19)RESULT FINDING OF

. - DEFECTA. DIMENSIONAL INSPECTIONI. Weight- 0.37 kg (13.5 oz) or lighter(unit, battery, neck lanyard, lens cap, eye cap, demist shield,

,.

Major.and dive window) 0__ " __ •._" __

2. Dimension-I05mmx5lmmx63mm(±lO%) Minor

,

B. VISUAL1. Power Supply - Adaptable to AA ~oLitl!iun~.._ Minor2. Eve Relief - 25mm or better Major,-_._"---3. Integrated IR Illuminator Minor~,----4. Internal Low Batterv Indicator , Minor5. Internal IR Illuminator Indicator - Minor.6. Intensifier Tube - Generation 3 Major,-_._,..-..7. F-Number-1.2 Minor.10__ •• ___ ••_

8. Compatible with all weapons mountings, IR Laser Aimingand other Illuminating Device (ie Sniper Scope, Laser Aiming MajorModule) .--...9. Accessories :

a. Hard Carrying Case0 ---

b. Neck Lanyard..-_._ ..-_ .. Maior

c. Weapons Kit .--.----Minor

(transfer piece for Pica Tinv Rail) Major

d. Demist Shield Minore. Sacrificial Filter/Window (for ol;jectiv,e

lenses)Minor

f. Maintenance Kit (OEM).--_."-

Minorg. Dive Windows Maiorh. Lens Cap Maior ,."i. Helmet or Head Mounting Gear

.-----.i. Lens Cleaning Pad

._-_ •..- Maior

._-_ .... Minork. 5x A-focal lenses Maior1.Data SheetlReference Card - ..

m. 2 pes additional batteries- Minor

.- Minorn. Video/Camera Adapter Maiero. Instructional Manual and/or CD

.,--,-, ..-...-p, Manufacturer's Trademark

'_'_."_ON Maier

c. At Least Two (2) Years Warran1L.._~MaierMaior

r. Video Camera with adapter Maior,-----RES U L'r.,---_ .._-

.~--..1

Note: (For Post Qualifi,cation Only)a. There should be "NU" major defect.

..J:.

'. , i . I t

b. There should only be a maximum of three (3) minor defectsc. One CD or more major defect/s means failure in the test andevaluation and therefore will not proceed to Phase II which isthe functional/destructive testing. -

i,I.I

il:1\:I'i1,;

ase - C III es lit roce ure:PNP SPECIFICATIONS

CLASS-RESULT FINDING OF

(UESB Resolution 2006-19) DEFECT•1. Battery Life - 40 hrs of continuous ' Majoroperation (min)2. Raaae of Focus - 0.25m to in~lDityor be1~~! Major3. Diooter Adiustment - -4 to +<[ or better. Major4. Field of View - 400 (min) or better Major5. Reeosnlnon Ranze - 250m (Dl~in)or ~eU;~!':= Major6. Detection Range - 430m (min] or better ...

(Quarter Moon - 500m, Starliglit - 375m. Cloud MajorCovered - 200m) ,-_._ ..-...

Maior7. Mal!nification - Ix or better8. Interpupillary Adjustment - ~i5mm to Thnm Major

Or better -9. Immersion - 20m for 1 br in SllJtywater _ Major10. Resolution - 641D/mm (min) '" Maior11. IR IUuminator Ranae - 20m ,<min) Maior12. Reliabilitv - 10,000 br (min) Maior13. Sil!nallNoise Ratio - 19.5 (m!~) Maior14. Shock Resistance - dropped !~.5ft from soft

Majorground twice

., - -

RESULT ,0' ____ 0

" __ O __ ~ ___

Ph IT A tu IT tm P d

VI. ACCEPTANCE tEST AND EVALUATION:

- one hundred percent (100%) sampling

;.i - verification/testing on the image intensifier tube will be conducted by an independenttesting institution which' will be witnessed by the designated inspection team.

VIT. For strict compliance.

RAYDRODEROSPolice Chief Superintendent

By:

NELSON 0Police Se .or Superintendent