DRD Manual Upd8 latest chapters.doc

1

CHAPTER 1

THE DIRECTORATE FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

I. Introduction

The Directorate for Research and Development (DRD) manual aims to provide the user and the reader a grasps on what the DRD has been doing in terms of testing whether procurement related or capability build-up.

This manual shows the procedure as well guidelines and standards in determining the quality of every equipment or devices procured or to be procured by the PNP.

The Chapters showed herein depict each DRD Divisions/Sections’ work or functions.

Moreover, this manual will help the users and the reader understand how quality is determined and evaluated.

II. HISTORY OF THE DIRECTORATE FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research is a very broad human activity embracing various aspects of man’s existence. It is practically a “conception resurrection” concept that deals with all the branches of knowledge. Research work, however, may be limited depending upon the scope of the study being conducted, In law and justice, a research may be undertaken to redefine police role as some legal adjustments are made to adapt to social change. In law enforcement, research may be done to resolve ethical problems within police agencies. The most common problem areas being explored are in the organizational frontiers, behavioral patterns, processes and procedures and value system. Legal Bases of DRD

Republic Act 6975 establishes the Philippine National Police under a reorganized Department of the Interior and Local Government, Section 25, Chapter III thereof provides for its organization. Section 30, Rule VII of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Act, provides that “the Chief of the PNP shall, within sixty (60) days from the activity of the Act and accordance with the broad guidelines set forth therein, recommend the organizational structure and staffing pattern of the PNP to the National Police Commission.

2

NAPOLCOM, in its resolution numbered 92 -36, approved the revised organizational structure of the PNP on October 11, 1993, by virtue of NHQ, PNP General Order No. 834. PCSUPT MILTON F TIBURCIO was designated as the Director of the Directorate for Research and Development. Activation

The Directorate for Research and Development was activated on November 1, 1993 and became Operational on January 16, 1994 imbibing a conspicuous role in PNP organization which is to conduct research studies pertaining to the criminalistics equipment and other peculiar and investigative equipment/materials, communications–electronic and transportation. Weapons and clothing for effective and efficient law and order public safety function and to uphold the furtherance and self–reliant development projects of the PNP.

MISSION

Assists and advises the Chief, PNP in the conduct of Research and Development. Test and Evaluation (T&E) of Clothing, materiel, vehicles and equipment required by the PNP for effective and efficient maintenance of Law and Order and Public Safety, and in the formulation and implementation of the PNP’s Self Reliant Development Program.

FUNCTION

To conduct research and study on the latest technology and materiel;

To determine and develop specifications and standards for all PNP equipment (UESB);

To conduct test and evaluation of clothing, materiel, vehicles and equipment procured by the PNP;

To perform such other functions as the Chief, PNP may direct;

To coordinate, correlate and cooperate with government and non–government agencies in undertaking research and development activities;

To coordinate for the training, either local or foreign of PNP Personnel in the areas of Research and Development and Test and Evaluation;

To formulate/update/improve Research and Development and Test and Evaluation policies/procedures/capabilities, and;

To direct and supervise the formulation and implementation of the PNP’s Self Reliance Development Program.

3

CHAPTER 2

Weapons Transportation and Communication Division (WTCD)

Introduction

The Weapons, Transportation and Communication Division (WTCD) was one of the initial divisions formed when the DRD began operations in 1994. To this day, its major function is to review and improve the research and development as well as test and evaluation procedures and capabilities regarding weapons, transportation and communication requirements of the PNP.

Specifically, the division develops standard design and specifications in accordance with domestic and international standards, It also supervises and monitors the conduct of test and evaluation on items procured by the PNP as to their need, feasibility and acceptability. Likewise, it supervises and monitors cognizant units in the preparation of test, analysis and evaluation of equipment reports.

The Division’s current activities have stressed on self reliance development programs; technical inspections and functional acceptance tests of rifles and pistols. Function

Review and improve Research and Development (R & D) and test and evaluation (T&E) procedures and capabilities regarding WTCD requirement of Command;Develop PNP specifications standards in accordance with domestic and international standards;

Supervise and monitor the conduct of test and evaluation on items procured and subject of procurement by the PNP as to its need, feasibility and acceptability;

Supervise and monitor cognizant units in the preparation of test, analysis and evaluation of equipment; and Perform other duties as directed by higher authorities.

4

Section 2-1 Weapons Section

1.1 Weapons Section

In line with its functions, this section played a major role in the DOST–PNP “M16 barrels as well as to the testing and evaluation of the prototype rifle units. Their work focused on the barrel performance of the units after going thru locally made barrel replacement, hard chrome plating and barrel cutting. The divisions specific tasks are to supervise and monitor the accuracy test, endurance firing test, (5,000 rounds), thermal scanning, radiographic testing, magnaflux testing and other procedural test consequently, the prototype rifle units have successfully passed international test and evaluation standards.

In the near future, the division hopes to oversee the conduct of test and evaluation of other essential parts of the M16 A1 rifle for its further refurbishment. The division is also confident of facilitating the procurement of locally made firearms as a result of own research and development undertaking, the improvement of other weapons and equipments needed by the PNP.

1.1.1 DEFINITION OF TERMS:

1. Acceptance Quality Level (AQL) – the level with designated value of percent defective (or defects per hundred units) by which the consumer or evaluator has indicated that will be accepted in accordance with the Acceptance and Sampling Procedure;

2. Acceptance Test and Evaluation – a series of tests and procedures conducted on delivered equipment/supplies prior acceptance by the procuring agency as agreed or as stipulated in the contract for the fulfillment of an obligation;

3. Accuracy Test – test where the weapon when fired must hit the object with a required number of rounds and the hit must remain in fixed position and it should not exceed the required Mean Radius Spread (MRS) or Mean Diameter Spread (MDS);

4. Adverse Condition Test – (Sand and Mud Test) – the pouring of sand on the weapon and its emerssion in mud for a required period of time to determine its reliability and usability while under adverse conditions;

5. Authorized Testing Institutions – agencies or institutions authorized and tapped by the PNP to conduct testing of sample(s) submitted by proponents;

5

6. Assembly – refers to the construction of parts taken or identified as one unit or entity.

7. Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) – a committee established by the PNP pursuant to Article V of RA 9148.

8. Catastrophic Failure – a type of incident characterized by the violent disassembly of the gun assembly (or one or more of its components), is ussually accompanied by breakage and deformation and is always cause by the inability of the gun assembly to contain the internal pressures present at the time of the failure. Catastrophic failures may be the result of a single, extremly high pressure firing or a multiplicity of firing above normal operating pressures but less than that required of a single firing which will produce catatrophic failures.

9. Certificate of Eligibility – A certificate issued by the DRD to proponents whose samples passed the Eligibility Test pursuant to the Standard prescribed by this Memo Circular.

10. Combat Load – the standard gunpowdered load for combat operation which has pressure able of propelling the full metal jacket slug or bullted in its rated speed or velocity.

11. Critical Defect – a defect that would result in hazardous or unsafe conditions for individuals using or maintaining a particular equipment; or a defect that may impair the tactical performance of any major end item such as weapon, ship, aircraft, tank, missile, or space vehicle, evaluated through experience and/or judgment by the technical committee.

12. Critical Defective – a unit or product which contains one or more critical defects; major as well as minor. It includes parts that affect the functioning of the firearms or other malfunctions that may cause injury to the firer or shooter like blown barrel or heavily broken main frame which cannot be replaced at once.

13. Directorate for Research and Development (DRD) – The Directorial Staff of the PNP tasked to conduct research and development; to test and evaluate clothing, materiel, vehicles and equipment needed by the PNP for effective and efficient maintenance of public order and safety; and to pursue the PNP’s Self-Reliant Development Program (SRDP);

6

14. Double Action – a mode of operation that permits a single pull of the trigger to cock and fire the pistol;

15. Dud Ammunition – Cartridge that did not explode due to low order detonation;

16. Dummy Round – Consists of cartridge case and ball bullet ussually used for practice and loading weapon for simulated firing

17. Eligibility Test and Evaluation – a series of tests which parameters are applied and procedures are conducted on the samples of equipment/supplies submitted by proponents/suppliers to determine the compliance to the established standard, in order to make the proponent(s) eligible to supply the said equipment or supplies.

18. Endurance Test – the prolonged firing of a weapon with the required number of ammunition per firearm.

19. Firer - a designated person who has the ability to fire and shoot accurately and who has the proficiency in weapon’s operation. The designation shall be determined by the DRD in consultation with the concerned proponents based on the kind of test to be conducted.

20. Firing Examination – the actual firing of the sample weapon using appropriate ammunition to determine its performance, capability, and suitability for PNP use, employing for such purpose, a standard testing parameters on a step-by-step basis.

21. Grains – Unit of measurements of gun powder.

22. Grenade Launcher – A weapon that launches a grenade to a greater distance, more accurately, and faster than a soldier could throw by hand. Most grenade launchers are man-portable, shoulder-fired weapons, usually attached to a rifle such as the Ak-47 or M16.

23. Gunpowder – The chemical mixture of saltpeter (potassium nitrate) at 75%, sulfur 10% and charcoal 15%. When it is ignited it burns rapidly and makes an explosion.

24. Hand Rest – an object used by the firer to support a weapon during firing.

25. High Pressure (HP) Cartridge/Proof Load Ammunition – ammunition especially made which produces pressure sustantially in excess of the maximum average or individual pressure of the corresponding service cartridge.

7

26. Interchangeability Test – The test firing of two (2) samples of the same brand and quality with interchanged major parts, to determine its reliability and usability.

27. Machine Rest – a device that clamp and support a weapon for a firmer position, usually employed in accuracy test.

28. Magnetic Particles Test (Magnaflux Test) – a scientific test or procedure using a machine and chemical solutions to determine the presence of cracks or splits of weapon submitted for Eligibility Test and Evaluation

29. Maintainability Test – the disassembling and assembling of weapon to determine the ease and speed of the process from the maintenance standpoint.

30. Major Defect – a defect, other than critical, that is likely to result in failure or in material reduction of the weapon’s use from its intended purpose.

31. Major Defective – a weapon which contains one or more major defects, that may also contain minor defects but no critical defect.

32. Major Parts – parts, component or assembly of the pistol or firearm whose principal or secondary purpose is the containment of the internal pressures such as barrel assembly, receiver or bolt.

33. Mean Radius Spread (MRS) – the measure of spread or unit of accuracy calculated from two dimensional axis (horizontal & vertical) using the average of computed horizontal and vertical axis as its center. Radius of its hit from the center is measured then taking the average as its final output.

34. Mean Diagonal Spread (MDS) - the measure of spread or unit of accuracy calculated by taking the outside most hit as its sides producing a parallelogram then the diagonal is measured to be its final output.

35. Minor Defect – a defect that is not likely to reduce materially the use of the unit or product for its intended purpose; or a defect which is a departure to the established standards but having little bearing on the effective use or operation of the unit or product.

36. Minor Defective – is a weapon which contains one or more defects, but not major or critical defect.

8

37. Minor Parts – are non-pressure containing parts of a weapon such as extractor, firing pin, ejector, hammer, etc.

38. Observers – are personnel or representative(s) of different PNP Offices/Units and the NAPOLCOM tasked by their respective offices to witness and observe the conduct of Eligibility and Acceptance Test.

39. Ordnance - Military materiel, such as weapons, ammunition, combat vehicles, and equipment.

40. Pre-firing Examination – the physical examination of the sample firearm(s) to determine its conformity with the NAPOLCOM-approved Standard Specifications as to length, width, weight, design and other features that should be complied with before it could qualify to the next phase of the test.

41. Primer – a high explosive charge used to ignite the gunpowder that propels the bullet or slug.

42. Proof Load Test – the firing of the weapon using a High Pressure (HP) Cartridge.

43. Proponents - Suppliers/Dealers duly accredited to transact business with the PNP.

44. Receiver - body of weapon, bolt housing or main housing.

45. Representative from other offices and the proponents-witnesses during the conduct of the entries test.

46. Safe Action – also known as striker fire action; a pistol design which employs an internal striker mechanism to detonate the primer. In operation, the pistol is normally in a partially cocked condition. Pulling the trigger completes the cooking action and then releases the striker mechanism to fire the pistol.

47. Sample – a representative unit/equipment/supply taken from a certain batch/lot of that unit/equipment/supply.

48. Sampling Plan – indicates the number of weapons from each lot or batch which are to be inspected (sample size or series of sample sizes); and the criteria for determining the acceptability of the lot or batch (acceptance and rejection numbers).

9

49. Single Action – a mode of operation that uses trigger to fire the pistol only

50. Stoppages – the incidental interruptions in the cycle of functioning caused by faulty actions of the weapon, ammunition or the firer.

51. Technical Committee Team – a team of technical personnel from DRD tasked to conduct eligibility and acceptance tests of Grenade Launchers.

52. Technical Personnel - personnel from DRD, who have technical knowledge on weapons and related equipment/items, detailed to conduct the eligibility and acceptance test.

53. Technician - a skilled personnel with technical knowledge capable of troubleshooting and applying techniques to fix a problematic weapon. Technical Personnel – personnel from DRD, who have technical knowledge on firearms and related equipment / items, detailed to conduct the eligibility and acceptance tests.

54. Trigger Pull Test –a test used to determine the mass or force exerted in pulling the trigger in accordance with the weapon’s standard trigger pull.

55. Weak-hand Shooter –a firer/shooter used in Endurance Test with lesser firing experience than ordinary shooter whose ability will be used in determining the compatability of the firearm to the weak-hand shooters such as Neophyte Police Officers engaged in a battle, Police Officers with limited firing experiences.

56. Weapon Drop and Safety Test – the dropping of a fully loaded weapon/firearm from the required height for two (2) times to determine its reliability, quality and safety characteristics

1.1.2 DIRECTORATE FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (DRD)TECHNICAL COMMITTEE AND TECHNICAL TEAM(S)

A Technical Committee (TC) from DRD shall be organized and shall be composed of personnel who have technical knowledge on firearms and related equipment/items during the conduct of the eligibility and acceptance test of the Grenade launchers.

A. DRD Technical Committee

DRD Technical Committee shall be composed of the following:

10

1. The Director for Research and Development (TDRD) or his duly designated representative – Chairman;

2. Chief, Weapons Transportation and Communications Division (WTCD) - Vice-Chairman;

3. Chief, Weapons Section – Chief, Secretariat;4. Weapons PNCO – Recorder; and,5. Weapons Section Engineer – Member.

B. DRD Technical Team(s)

There shall be DRD Technical Team(s) which shall be responsible for the conduct of eligibility and acceptance tests. It shall be organized after the pre-bid conference for Eligibility Test or after a Memo has been received indicating therein the request for inspection or Acceptance Test. The number of Teams for Eligibility Test will vary depending on the date of completion set by the BAC. In case of Acceptance Test, regular members of the DRD Technical Committee shall compose the Team. Members of the Team may come from other Division or Section upon discretion of the Chairman, Technical Committee.

1. Composition:

A Team shall be composed of the following:

a. Team Leader – Police Commissioned Officer (PCO);b. Members–Minimum of one (1) Police Non-Commissioned

Officer (PNCO) and one (1) NUP (at least one (1) must be Technical Personnel or Technician); and,

c. Recorder – one (1) NUP.

2. Duties:

a. Team Leader - direct, supervise the overall activity of the team;b. Members – Assist and supervise the conduct of test as directed

by the Team Leader; and,c. Recorder – Record all pertinent matters during the entire test.

C. PNP Technical Working Group (TWG)

There shall be a PNP Technical Working Group that shall be responsible in the conduct of Post Evaluation and Acceptance Test. It shall be organized after the pre-bid conference for post evaluation or after a memo has been received indicating therein the request for test and evaluation.

1. Composition:

11

The TWG shall be composed of the following:

a. Head – Chief, WTCD, DRD;b. Asst Head – Next ranking PCO from other PNP offices/units;c. Members – Representatives from other PNP offices/units and

End user;d. Secretariat – Chief, Weapons Section, WTCD, DRD; e. Member – Minimum of one (1) PNCO and one (1) NUP (at

least one (1) must be Technical Personnel or Technician); and,f. Recorder – One (1) NUP.

2. Duties:

a. Head – Direct, supervise the overall activity of the Group;b. Asst Head – Assist the Head TWG in the Supervision of the

activity;c. Member – Witness and assist the Conduct of test as directed

by the Head TWG;d. Secretariat – Oversee the proper recording of the activity; and,e. Recorder – To record all pertinent matters during the entire

test.

1.1.3 POLICY GUIDELINES

A. The Bids and Awards Committee (BAC), whether the NHQ or PRO, or the NHQ Negotiation Committee (NC) shall cause the conduct of eligibility or post qualification test of grenade launchers. For acceptance purposes, the Inspection and Acceptance Committee (IAC), shall request the DRD to conduct the acceptance test;

B. The proponents shall submit to the DRD two (2) samples of grenade launchers for Eligibility or Post Qualification Test regardless of the quantity to be procured;

C. During the bidding, the BAC, through its Technical Working Group (TWG) present, shall conduct visual inspection of the sample to determine whether it conforms with the basic technical specifications and features before the same is subjected to functional testing ;

D. The Weapons Section PNCO of DRD shall receive the sample firearms from the proponent(s) and issue receipts therefor. He shall turn it over to the Supply PNCO of DRD for safekeeping. The Supply PNCO shall remain the repository of all samples during the entire duration of the test or validity of Certificate of Eligibility. The Weapons and Supply PNCO shall see to it that the submitted

12

samples are properly stored, marked and sealed to maintain their integrity;

E. The DRD shall immediately inform the BAC on the termination of submission of samples (s) and the number of proponents who submitted samples;

F. During the pre-bid conference, the TWG and DRD representatives shall inform the proponents of the technical specifications and of the approved policy guidelines and parameters to be used in the examination and testing of the samples;

G. The DRD shall provide Technical personnel who will oversee the conduct of the Test at the selected testing places. The Test shall be witnessed by representatives from other offices of the PNP, the NAPOLCOM, the proponents and other persons if party in interest. To the most, a video footage of the conduct of the test shall be taken for future reference, and to the least, a combination of pictorial and voice recording may suffice;

H. The DRD may conduct Test and Evaluation of items even in the absence of any procurement program and directive from the PNP BAC, which will be termed as Product Evaluation. The product evaluation result shall only be used as reference for any recommendation, which DRD may deem appropriate;

I. The Test Parameters must be conducted one after the other (chronologically or step by step). It is prohibited to proceed to the next or succeeding parameters without finishing the earlier or preceding parameters. Any problem arising from a particular Test parameter shall be immediately brought to the attention of the Head, DRD Technical Committee or the Team Leader. Failure on the part of any affected proponents to file or register complaint(s) on a particular Test parameter shall be deemed to be an acquiescence to the overall conduct of the Test;

J. Proponents shall shoulder all the expenses for the testing and provide the ammunition to be used. They shall also submit the names of their technicians, firers and representatives who may attend the conduct of the test and evaluation. If testing by other government entity is necessary, like the MIRDC, the expenses for such purposes shall also be for the account of the proponent;

K. The proponents shall submit the required ammunition, which may come from any legal source, to the DRD Technical Committee. All submitted ammunitions by the proponents shall be mixed, distributed equally among the proponents and be used during the Eligibility Test;

13

L. The proponents shall execute a waiver that the DRD-PNP Technical Committee shall not be held liable for whatsoever damage(s) to the weapons being used during the conduct of the Test and Evaluation;

M. The Test and Evaluation may be postponed and re-scheduled by the DRD Technical Committee in the absence of the Proponent or its authorized representative for meritorious reason. A written request for rescheduling duly approved by The Director for Research and Development (TDRD) shall precipitate its resumption;

N. Any complaint on the sample(s) submitted for testing shall be brought immediately to the attention of Head, DRD Technical Committee for resolution;

O. Should there be any problem raised during the conduct of the test on a particular sample, the Head, DRD Technical Committee shall immediately suspend or stop the proceeding pending its resolution or settlement;

P. The results of the Eligibility Test and Evaluation on the sample Grenade Launchers shall be valid only for a particular procurement period. A report that contains the findings, conclusion and recommendations whether the sample is conforming or not conforming based on NAPOLCOM-approved standard specifications and the approved Test and Evaluation procedures used shall be submitted to BAC thru DRD;

Q. Proponents whose samples have failed the Eligibility Test may request for a reconsideration addressed to Chairman BAC. Said retest shall not be binding to the current procurement program. Result of the retest shall be used in the next procurement activity and shall not be binding in the current procurement program; and,

R. The samples of the proponents that failed the test and evaluation shall be returned to them except where a request for reconsideration is pending. After the resolution of the request and the same failed result is obtained, it is only then that the samples shall returned. Only the samples of those who passed shall be retained until the award of contract has been made. The samples of the non-winning bidders shall be returned after the award of contract. The samples of the winning bidder shall be retained for purposes of comparison with the items that shall be delivered. Upon final acceptance of the items, the samples shall be returned to the winning bidder. From the award of contract up to delivery and acceptance, the samples shall not be withdrawn nor they be replaced. Withdrawal or replacement shall be

14

ground for nullification of the award of contract as recommended by the DRD.

1.1.4 TEST AND EVALUATION PROCEDURES

2.1.4.1 MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR Number 2007-01

POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ELIGIBILITY TESTFOR GRENADE LAUNCHER 40MM

A. Phase I (Pre-firing Examination)

1. Purpose:

To ascertain if the submitted samples conform/comply with the NAPOLCOM-approved standard specifications as to weight, dimensions, and length characteristics. It does not include range malfunction and subsequent re-inspection and safety measures as required in functional firing.

2. Visual and Dimensional Inspection:

This non-destructive test shall be performed to determine the overall workmanship and compliance to the standard or approved specifications in order to ensure safety of its user.

3. Equipment/Materials:

a. Measuring Tape (100 Meters);b. Gun Oil;c. Venire Caliper;d. Weighing Scale;f. Masking Tape; and,g. Ammunition requirements (1 round).

4. Procedure:

a. Conduct visual and dimensional inspection by following the test and evaluation sheet form found in Enclosure “1” to determine the actual dimensions, weight, weapon characteristics, vis-à-vis NAPOLCOM-approved Standard Specifications;

b. Examine the Grenade Launcher for proper functioning by cocking, putting the safety lever ON and Off and dry firing to ensure safety during firing and assure the completeness of the parts;

15

c. Check the Grenade Launcher for proper lubrication; and,d. Load one (1) round ammunition and fire the Grenade Launcher

to determine its initial operability.

5. Standard:

a. There must be no missing part;b. There must be no excessive binding during the Loading of

ammo into the chamber;c. It must not fire when set to “SAFE” position; and,d. There must be no evidence of burrs and Bulge in the exterior

rim of the barrel.

B. Phase II (Firing Examination)

1. Zeroing

a. Purpose: To determine the correct Zero which consist of the elevation and windage sight settings that will enable the grenadier to hit the point of aim at a given range.

b. Equipment/Materials:

1. Measuring tape;2. Gun Oil;3. Improvised Target; and,4. Ammunition Requirements (1 round).

c. Procedure:

1. Select a target at 200 meters and put the improvised target; and;

2. Load one (1) round of 40mm ammunition then fire toward the target.

d. Standard:

1. The Grenade Launcher must fire without malfunction; and;2. Must hit the target.

2. Maintainability Test

a. Purpose:

To determine the ease of assembly and disassembly of the Grenade Launcher, how many parts does it has and its operability after performing disassembly and assembly.

16


1. Tools (hammer, pliers, screw driver, dummy pin or pin punch, improvised tools); and,

2. Ammunition Requirement (1 round).

c. Procedure:

1. Disassemble one (1) Grenade Launcher 40mm; 2. Record the number of parts and tools used;3. Assemble the Grenade Launcher 40mm; and,4. Load one (1) round Ammunition then fire.

d. Standard:

Grenade Launcher must fire without malfunction.

3. Weapons Drop Test:

a. Purpose:

To determine the reliability, quality and safety characteristic of the Grenade launcher when dropped on a concrete floor.


1. One (1) dummy round or primed cartridge case wherein powder and slug are removed and the primer is retained;

2. One (1) round of ammunition Requirements for each Grenade Launcher 40mm.

c. Procedure:

1. Load the dummy round or primed cartridge;2. Put the safe lock at “SAFE” position (safety on – hammer

down or safety on–hammer cocked);3. Drop the Grenade Launcher from a height of four (4) feet

at the following position:

a. Upside down, barrel horizontal (free fall); and,b. On grip, barrel vertical (free fall).

4. After dropping, removed the dummy round or primed cartridge case. Examine the firearm for damage and record any crack, chips or other visible damage. Examine

17

also the dummy round or primed cartridge case for dent(s);

5. Load one (1) round and fire the Grenade Launcher until the ammunition has been expended; and,

6. Release and record any sticking or binding as well as misfire and malfunctions.

d. Standard:

1. There must be no dent on the primer of the chamber-loaded dummy round or primed cartridge case; and,

2. Evidence of crack/split on barrel is classified as critical defect and shall mean outright rejection.

4. Endurance Test:

a. Purpose:

To determine the reliability of the weapon under prolonged firing condition. This could be measured by the number of malfunctions, number of parts that become unserviceable.

b. Equipment/materials:

1. Ammunition requirement - 21 rounds;2. Gun Oil;3. Bore brush; and,4. Flannel cloth.

c. Procedure:

1. The Grenade launcher must be fired with twenty one (21) rounds live ammo (HE and HEDP);

2. Record the malfunctions, their causes and what number of ammunition when malfunction has occurred;

3. Allow the weapon to cool for ten (10) minutes after firing seven (7) rounds. Swabbing off the Barrel is allowed;

4. Repeat the procedure until the weapon has consumed the required number of ammunition;

5. Stop the test when malfunctions or stoppages have exceeded 2.5% (97.5% reliability mark) of the total 21 rounds; and,

6. Replacement of part(s) is not allowed.

d. Standard:

18

1. Malfunctions or stoppages exceeding 97.5% reliability mark is classified as critical and shall mean automatic rejection; and,

2. Evidence of crack or blown barrel or frame is automatically classified as critical and shall mean automatic rejection.

C. PHASE III (Magnetic Particle Test/Magnaflux)

1. Purpose:

To determine whether the sample 40mm Grenade Launcher has withstood the pressure firing incurred during or after a series of test which could not be seen or viewed by man’s naked eyes. It uses scientific procedure in determining the presence of cracks or splits.

2. Procedure:

a. After completion of the five (5) test parameters done chronologically, separate the Barrel in parts;

b. Mark the barrels with masking tape and indicate therein serial numbers (if any) of the launcher where it belong then place in a launcher case. Thereafter, seal the launcher case with masking tape and affix signature of all the proponents to preserve their integrity; and,

c. Bring the Barrel Assembly to Metals Industry Research and Development Center (MIRDC)-DOST for the Magnetic Particles Test (Magnaflux Test). This is the 6th or the last test parameters for the Eligibility Test and Evaluation.

3. Standard:

The result of the Magnaflux test should not contain any presence of cracks or splits. Mere presence of cracks or splits on any submitted item(s) shall mean outright rejection of the sample.

POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ACCEPTANCE TESTFOR GRENADE LAUNCHER 40MM

A. Random Sampling

The sample size for Acceptance Test from the delivered items will be based using the Military Standard 105-E, Normal Inspection Level II (see Table 1).

19

Procedure:

Pick samples at random based on the numbers tabulated above from the boxes of the delivered firearms.

B. Pre-firing Examination

1. Purpose:

Ascertain if the submitted samples conform/comply with the NAPOLCOM-approved Standard Specifications as to weight, dimensions, length characteristics. It does not include range malfunction and subsequent re-inspection and safety precaution as required in functional firing.




a. Measuring Tape (100 meters);b. Gun Oil;c. Venire Caliper;d. Weighing Scale;e. Masking Tape; and,f. Ammunition requirements (1 round).

4. Procedure:

a. Conduct visual and dimensional inspection by following the test and evaluation sheet form found in Enclosure “1” to determine the actual dimensions, weight, firearm characteristics, vis-à-vis NAPOLCOM-approved Standard Specifications;

b. Examine the Grenade Launcher for proper functioning by cocking, putting the safety lever ON and Off and dry firing to ensure safety during firing and assure the completeness of the parts;

c. Check the Grenade Launcher for proper lubrication; and,d. Load one (1) round ammunition and fire the Grenade launcher

to determine its initial operability.

5. Standard:

a. There must be no missing part;

20

b. There must be no excessive binding during the Loading of ammo into the chamber;

c. It must not fire when set to “SAFE” position; and,d. There must be no evidence of burr(s) and bulge in the bore and

or exterior rim of the barrel.

C. Zeroing

1. Purpose:

To determine the correct Zero which consist of the elevation and windage sight settings that will enable the grenadier to hit the point of aim at a given range.


a. Measuring tape;b. Gun Oil;c. Improvised Target; and,d. Ammunition Requirements (1 round).

3. Procedure:

a. Select a target at 200 meters and put the improvised target; and,

b. Load one (1) round of 40mm ammunition then fire.

4. Standard:

a. The Grenade Launcher must fire without malfunction; and,b. Must hit the target.

D. Functional Test:

1. Purpose:

To determine the reability of the weapon after firing the required number of rounds.


a. Ammunition requirement 5 rounds;b. Gun Oil;c. Bore Brash; and,d. Flannel Cloth.

21

3. Procedure:

The Grenade launcher must be fired with the required number of ammunitions.

4. Standard:

The Grenade Launcher must fire with out malfunction.

E. Acceptance/Rejection:

1. The results of the above-cited test criteria will be based on the 1.5% of the Acceptance Quality Level (AQL) of Military Standard 105-E, General Inspection Level II (see Table 2).

2. The PNP shall adopt the prescribed sampling plan which is advantageous to the government.

2.1.4.2 MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR Number 2006 -01

POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ELIGIBILITY TESTFOR SHOTGUN 12 GAUGE


1. Purpose:

Ascertain if the submitted samples conform/comply with the NAPOLCOM-approved standard specifications as to weight, dimensions, length and force, finish, receiver, muzzle and bore characteristics. It does not include range malfunction and subsequent re-inspection and safety precaution as required in functional firing.




a. Measuring Tape (100 Meters)b. Gun Oilc. Vernier Caliper

22

d. Weighing Scalee. Permanent markerf. Masking Tapeg. Ammunition requirements (14 rounds)

4. Procedure:

a. Conduct visual and dimensional inspection by following the test and evaluation sheet form found in Inclosure “1” to determine the actual dimensions, weight, firearm characteristics, vis-a-vis NAPOLCOM-approved Standard Specifications;

b. Examine the Shotgun for proper functioning by cocking, putting the safety lever On and OFF, dry firing to ensure safety during firing and assure the completeness of the parts;

c. Check the Shotgun for proper lubrication;d. Load fourteen (14) rounds ammunition and fire the Shotgun to

determine its initial operability.

5. Standard:

a. There must be no missing parts.b. It must not fire when set to “SAFE” position.c. There must be no evidence of burrs and bulge in the bore and

or exterior rim of the barrel.d. The Shotgun must function properly without any binding of

moving parts.


1. Accuracy Test

a. Purpose:

To determine the accuracy of the weapon using machine rest or equivalent.

b. Equipment / Material:

1. Measuring Tape (100 meters)2. Machine Rest or equivalent3. Vernier Caliper4. Target paper5. Calculator6. Triangle7. Ammunition Requirement (8 rounds-“00 Buck”)

23

c. Firers:

PNP Technical Team or Proponent’s supplied shooter(s) are authorized.

d. Procedure:

1. Using a machine rest or equivalent, the Shotgun will be fired at range or distance using:a. 7 metersb. 15 meters

2. First four (4) rounds will be fired for first set to check the pattern of the hit in the target. The remaining four (4) rounds is for the second set which will be fired for record purposes. Number of pellets hit and their spread/grouping on the target paper must be recorded.

e. Standard:

The nine (9) pellets must hit the target at 7 and 15 meters distance and must not exceed 6-inch mean radius. Yaw or miss on the target is equivalent to 1-inch mean radius to be added to the average mean radius of hits on the target.

2. Interchangeability Test

a. Purpose:

To determine the reliability of the Shotgun when parts from identical firearms are interchanged.


1. Tools (hammer, plier, screw driver, dummy pin or pin punch, improvised tools)

2. Four target papers per Shotgun3. Ammunition Requirement (14 rounds)

c. Procedure:

1. Disassemble the shotgun and interchange the named parts following the prescribed schedule:

Nomenclature of Parts Scheduled Movement of Parts from One Rifle to Another

24

Receiver A→B B→ABolt A→B B→AMagazine Spring A→B B→ABarrel A→B B→ATrigger Assembly A→B B→A

2. Assemble the Shotgun with parts interchanged. 3. Load seven (14) rounds and then fire.4. After firing, return the interchanged parts to its original

place.

d. Standard:

The Shotgun must function properly without any binding of moving parts.

3. Maintainability Test:

a. Purpose:

To determine the ease of assembly and disassembly of the Shotgun and the number of parts and its operability after performing disassembly and assembly.


1. Tools (hammer, plier, screw driver, dummy pin or pin punch, improvised tools)

2. Ammunition Requirement (14 rounds)

c. Procedure:

1. Disassemble one (1) Shotgun 12 Gauge; 2. Record the number of parts and tools used;3. Assemble the Shotgun 12 Gauge; and4. Load seven (14) rounds Ammunition then fire.

d. Standard:

Shotgun must fire without malfunction.

4. Endurance Test:

1. Purpose:

25

To determine the reliability of the Shotgun under prolonged firing condition. This could be measured by the number of malfunctions, number of parts that become unserviceable and the variation in accuracy and muzzle velocity.

2. Equipment / Materials:

a. Ammunition Requirement: 500 Roundsb. Gun Oilc. Bore Brushd. Flannel cloth

3. Estimated Duration of Test – four (4) hours only (9:00 to 11:00 A.M. AND 1:00 to 3:00 P.M.)

4. Procedure:

a. The shotgun must be fired with the required number of ammunition as tabulated in the Endurance Test Sheet Form found in Inclosure “2”.

b. It shall be fired with seven (7) rounds per set in a rhythm of slow firing and rapid firing interval continuously up to 500 rounds as tabulated below:

Magazine Tube Capacity

Allotted Time per SetLoading of

AmmoSlow Firing

Rapid Firing

7 Rounds 10 Seconds 10 Sec 7 Sec

c. Record the malfunctions, their causes and at what number of ammunition in magazine Tube when malfunction occurred in each set;

d. Stop the test when malfunctions or stoppages have exceeded 2.5% (97.5 reliability mark) of the total 500 rounds;

e. Replacement of part(s) is not allowed.

5. Standard:

26

a. Malfunction or stoppage exceeding 97.5% reliability mark is classified as critical and shall automatic rejection.

b. Evidence of crack or blown barrel or any moving parts is automatically classified as critical and shall mean automatic rejection.

C. PHASE III (Magnetic Particle Test/Magnaflux)

1. Purpose:

To determine whether the sample shotgun has withstood the pressures of firing incurred during or after a series of test which could not be seen or viewed by man’s naked eyes. It uses scientific procedure in determining the presence of crack or splits.

2. Procedure:

a. After completion of the five (5) test parameters done chronologically, separate the Barrel and Bolt assembly in its parts;

b. Mark the barrels with masking tape and indicate therein serial numbers (if any) of shotgun where they belong then place it in a shotgun case. Thereafter, seal the shotgun case with masking tape and affix signature of all the proponents to preserve their integrity.

c. Bring the Barrel and Bolt assembly to Metals Industry Research and Development Center (MIRDC) – DOST for the Magnaflux Particles Test (Magnaflux Text). This is the 6th or the last parameters for the Eligibility Test and Evaluation.

3. Standard:

The result of the magnaflux Test should not contain any presence of cracks or splits. Mere presence of crack or split on any submitted Barrel and Bolt Assembly shall mean outright rejection of the sample.

POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ACCEPTANCE TEST FOR SHOTGUN 12 GAUGE

27

A. Random Sampling

The sample size for Acceptance Test from the delivered items will be based using the Military Standard 105-E, Normal Inspection Level II (see Table 1).

Procedure:

Pick samples in random based on the numbers tabulated above from the boxes of the delivered firearms.

B. Pre-firing Examination

1. Purpose:

Ascertain if the submitted samples conform/comply with the NAPOLCOM-approved standard specifications as to weight, dimensions, length finish, receiver, muzzle and bore characteristics. It does not include range malfunction and subsequent re-inspection and safety precaution as required in functional firing.




a. Measuring Tape (100 meters)b. Gun Oilc. Vernier Caliperd. Weighing Scalee. Permanent markerf. Masking Tapeg. Ammunition requirements (14 rounds)

4. Procedure:

a. Conduct visual and dimensional inspection by following the test and evaluation sheet form found in Inclosure “1” to determine the actual dimensions, weight, firearm characteristics, vis-a-vis NAPOLCOM-approved Standard Specifications;

28

b. Examine the Shotgun Rifle for proper functioning by cocking, putting the safety lever On and OFF, dry firing to ensure safety during firing and assure the completeness of the parts;

c. Check the Shotgun for proper lubrication;

d. Load fourteen (14) rounds ammunition and fire the Shotgun to determine its initial operability.

5. Standard:

a. There must be no missing parts.b. It must not fire when set to “SAFE” position.c. There must be no evidence of burrs and bulge in the bore and

or exterior rim of the barrel.d. The Shotgun must function properly without any binding of

moving parts.

B. Accuracy Test

1. Purpose:

To determine the accuracy of the weapon using machine rest or equivalent.

2. Equipment/Material:

a. Measuring Tape (100 meters)b. Machine Rest or equivalent c. Vernier Caliperd. Target papere. Calculatorf. Triangleg. Ammunition Requirement (8 rounds)

3. Firers:

Only the PNP Technical Team is authorized.

4. Procedure:

a. Using a machine rest or equivalent, the Shotgun will be fired at range or distance using.1) 7 meters2) 15 meters

29

b. First four (4) rounds will be fired to check the pattern of the hit in the target. The remaining four (4) rounds is for the second set which will be fired for record purposes. Number of pellets hits and their spread/grouping on the target paper must be recorded.

5. Standard:

The nine (9) pellets must hit the target at 7 and 15 meters distance and must not exceed 6-inch mean radius. Yaw or miss on the target is equivalent to 1-inch mean radius to be added to the average mean radius of hits on the target.

C. Interchangeability Test

1. Purpose:

To determine the reliability of the Shotgun when parts from identical firearms are interchanged.


a. Tools (hammer, plier, screw driver, dummy pin or pin punch)b. Four target papers per riflec. Ammunition Requirement (14 rounds)

3. Procedure:

a. Pick two (2) samples at random.b. Disassemble the Shotgun and interchange the named parts

following the prescribed schedule:

Nomenclature of Parts

Scheduled Movement of Parts from One Rifle to Another

Receiver A→B B→ABolt A→B B→AMagazine Spring A→B B→ABarrel A→B B→ATrigger Assembly A→B B→A

c. Assemble the Shotgun with parts interchanged; andd. Load 14 rounds of ammunition then fire.e. After firing, put the interchanged parts to its original place.

30

4. Standard:

The shotgun must function properly without any binding of moving parts.

D. Acceptance/Rejection:

1. The results of the above-cited test criteria will be based on the 1.5% of the Acceptance Quality Level (AQL) of Mil Std 105-E, General Inspection Level II (see Table 2).

2. The PNP shall adopt the prescribed sampling plan which is advantageous to the government.


POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ELIGIBILITY TEST FOR PISTOLS

A. Phase 1 (Pre-firing Examination)

1. Purpose:

Ascertain if the submitted samples conform/comply with the NAPOLCOM-approved standard specifications as to weight, dimensions, trigger, pull length and force, finish, receiver, muzzle and bore characterictics. It does not include range malfunction and subsequent re-inspection and safety precaution as required in the functional firing.


This non-destructive test shall be performed to determine the overall workmanship and compliance to the standard of approved specifications in order to ensure safety of its user.


a. Trigger Pull Equipmentb. Gun Oilc. Vernier Caliperd. Weighing Scalee. Permanent markerf. Masking Tape

31

g. Ammunition requirements per Pistol

1) 9mm Pistol – 15 rds2) Cal .45 Pistol – 7 rds (standards) / 13 rds (High Cap)3) Cal .40 Pistol – 10 rds

4. Procedure:

a. Conduct visual and dimensional inspection by following the tests and evaluation sheet form found in Inclosure 1 to determine the actual dimensions, weight, firearm characteristics, vis-à-vis NAPOLCOM-approved Standard Specifications;

b. Examine the pistols for proper functioning by cooking, putting the safety lever On and OFF, dry firing to ensure safety during firing and assure the completeness of the parts;

c. Check the pistols for propoer lubrication;

d. Insert fully loaded magazine and fire the pistols to determine its initial operability.

5. Standard:

a. There must be no missing parts.

b. There must be no excessive binding during movement of the slide into the receiver.

c. It must not fire when set to “SAFE” position.

d. There must be no evidence of burns and bulge in the bore and or exterior rim of the barrel.

e. Trigger Pull:

Caliber .45 .40 9mmMaximum 6.5 lbs 6.5 lbs 6.0 lbsMinimum 3.0 lbs 3.0 lbs 4.0 lbs


1. Accuracy Test

a. Purpose: To determine the accuracy of the weapons using machine rest or equivalent.

32

b. Equipment/Material:

1) Machine Rest or equivalent2) Vernier Caliper3) Target paper4) Calculator5) Triangle6) Ammunition Requirement per Pistol

a) 9mm Pistol – 15 rdsb) Cal. 45 Pistol – 15 rds (standard) /15 rds (high cap)c) Cal. 40 Pistol – 15

c. Firers: PNP Technical Team or Proponent’s supplied shooter(s) are authorized.

d. Procedure:

1) Using a machine rest or equivalent, the pistol will be at range or distance of twenty five (25) meters.

2) First five (5) rounds will be fired for zeroing. The remaining ten (10) round will be fired for record purposes. Number of hits and their spread/grouping on the target paper must be recorded.

e. Standard:

The grouping of the ten-round shots must not exceed 6-inch mean radius. Yaw or miss on the target is equivalent to 1-inch mean radius to be added to the average mean radius of hits on the target.


a. Purpose:

To detemine the reliability of the pistols when parts from identical pistols are interchanged.


1) Tools (hammer), plier, screw driver, dummy pin or pin punch, improvised tools)

2) Four target papers per pistol3) Ammunition Requirements per Pistol

33

a) 9mm Pistol – 15 rdsb) Cal. 45 Pistol – 7 rds (standard) – 13 rds (high cap)c) Cal.40 Pistol – 10 rds

c. Procedure:

1) Disassemble the pistols and interchange the named parts following the prescribed schedule:

Nomenclature of Parts Scheduled Movemnet of Parts from One Pistol to Another

Receiver A→B A→BSlide A→B A→BSafety Lever A→B A→BTrigger A→B A→BRecoil Spring, Guide and/or Plug

A→B A→B

Firing Pin A→B A→BSlide Stop A→B A→BHammer Busing (for Cal .45) A→B A→BMain Spring Housing (for Cal .45)

A→B A→B

2) Assemble the pistols with parts interchanged.

3) Insert one fully loaded magazine and then fire.

4) After firing, put the interchanged parts to its original place.


a. Purpose: To determine the ease of assembly and disassembly of the pistol and the number of parts and its operability after performing disassembly and assembly.

b. Equipment / Materials:

1) Tools (hammer, plier, screw driver, dummy pin or pin puch, improvised tools)

2) Ammunition Requirement

a) 9mm Pistol 15 rdsb) Cal .45 Pistol 7 rds (standard) – 13 rds (high cap)c) Cal .40 Pistol – 10 rds

34

c. Procedure:

1) Disassemble one (1) pistol;2) Record the number of parts and tools used;3) Assemble the pistol; and4) Insert one (1) fully loaded magazine and fire.

d. Standard:

Pistol must fire without malfuction.

4. Adverse Condition Test (Sand Test & Mud Test)

a. Purpose: To determine the reliability (absence of malfuction or stoppages) of the pistol under adverse sondition, such as when emmersed in mud and sand.


1) Ammunition requirement per Pistola) 9mm Pistol – 30 rdsb) Cal. 45 Pistol – 14 rds (standard) ? 26 rds (high cap)c) Cal. 40 Pistol – 20 rds

2) Gun Oil3) Sand Box4) Ten (10) kilograms of sieved sand using a #30 wire mesh5) Timer6) 3M Making tape (1”)7) Mud mixture compose of four and a half (4.5) kilograms of

garden soil and one (1) kilogram of clean and with seven and a half (7.5) liters os water.

8) Electric Fan, 16-inch diameter fan blade9) Weighing Scale10) Basin

c. Procedures for Sand Test

1) The samples shall be cleaned and lubricated lightly;

2) Insert the fully liaded magazine to the pistol, chamber load, put the hammer at down position and tape the muzzle end of the weapon.

3) Put the sand in a sand box;

4) Place the pistol inside the sand box in upright position;

35

5) Pour the sand at a rae of three (3) kilograms per minute through a pole hole while the blower is turned at maximum speed selector for a period of one (1) minute;

6) Repeat steps 4) and 5) by placing the pistol in upside down position;

7) The firer shall clean the pistol, while removing the tape with bare hands and blow the congestion on the area of action;

8) The pistol will then be fired by expending maximum number of rounds of a fully loaded magazine; and

d. Standard for Sand Test:

The pistol must fire at least three (3) successive rouds strarting rom the chamber-loaded round.

e. Procedures for Mud Test

1) The weapon shall be cleaned and oiled lightly.

2) Insert the fully loaded magazine to the pistol, chamber load, put the hammer at down position and tape the muzzle end of the pistol to prevent entrance of mud into the bore;

3) Make a mud mixture by mixing forur and a half (4.5) kg of garden soil, 1 kilogram of sand and seven and a half (7.5) liters lof water in the basin;

4) Immerse the pistol completely in the mud for a duration of fifteen (15) seconds;

5) Retrieve the weapon from the basin and clean by wiping it with bare habds and by blowing sharply on the congested area of action;

6) Remove tape, unlock safety and fire; and

7) Clean the pistol thoroughly.

f. Standard for Mud Test:

The weapon must fire the chamber loaded round.

36

5. Weapon Drop and Safety Test

a. Purpose:

To determine the reliability, quality and safety characteristic of the pistol when dropped on a concrete floor.


1) One (1) dummy round or primed cartridge case wherein powder ans slug are removed and the primer is retained.

2) Ammunition Requirements for each firearm

a) 9mm Pistol – 15 rdsb) Cal. 45 Pistol 7 rds (standard / 13 rds (high cap)c) Cal. 40 Pistol – 10 rds

c. Procedure:

1) Load the dmmy round or primed cartridge case and insert the magazine fully loaded with ammunition.

2) Put the safety lock at “SAFE” position (safety on – hammer down or safety on – hammer cocked).

3) Drop the pistol from a height of five (5) feet at the following positions;

a) Upside down, barrel horizontal (free fall); andb) On grip, barrel vertical (free fall)

4) After dropping, remove magazine and the dummy round or primed cartridge case. Examine the firearm for damage record any cracks, chips or other visible damage. Examine also the dummy round or primed cartridge case for dent(s).

5) Insert the magazine, load and fire the pistol until the ammunition has been expended.

6) Release the magazine and record any sticking or binding as well as misfire and malfunctions.

37

d. Standard:

1) There must be no dent on the primer of the chamber-loaded dummy round or primed cartridge case;

2) It must fire the remaining rounds to determine its proper functioning.

3) The pistol shall be at hammer cock position;

4) Evidence of crack/split on barrel or slide or frame is lassified as critical defect and shall mean outright rejection.

6. Magazine Drop Test

a. Purpose:

To determine the reliability and durability of the magazine.


1) One (1) magazine2) One (1) complete load of ammunition

c. Procedure:

1) Load the magazine with maximum number of rounds.

2) Drop the fully loaded magazine freely from a height of five (5) feet on the concrete floor in two (2) positions:

a) base plate down position; andb) feed lip down position;

3) After dropping, insert magazine to the pistol and fire.

d. Standard:

There must be no malfunction ande damage to the magazine.

7. Endurance Test

a. Purpose:

To determine the reliability of the weapon under prolonged firing condition. This could ne measured by the number of

38

malfunctions, number of parts that become unserviceable and the variation in accuracy and muzzle velocity.


1) Ammunition Requirement: Five athousand (5,000) rounds2) Gun Oil3) Bore brush4) Flannel cloth5) Mgazine requiemnts per pistol

a) For Pistol 9mm – 10 pcsb) For Pistol Cal .45 Hi Cap – 12 pcsc) For Pistol Cal .45 Std – 22 pcsd) For Pistol Cal .40 – 15 pcs

c. Estimated Duration of Test – eight (8) hours only (8:00am-12noon and 1:00pm-5:00pm)

d. Procedure:

1) The pistol must be fired with the required number of ammunition as tabulated in the Endurance Test Sheet-Forms found in Inclosure 2;

2) It shall be fired with 150 rounds per set in a rhythm of slow firing and rapid firing interval tabulated below;

Caliber Magazine Capacity

Alloted Time per Magazine

Change Mag Slow Firing Rapid Firing

.9mm 15 10 sec 15 sec per mag

10 sec per mag

.45 Hi Cap 13 10 sec 13 sec per mag

9 sec per mag

.45 Std 7 10 sec 7 sec per mag

5 sec per mag

.40 10 10 sec 10 sec per mag

7 sec per mag

3) Record the malfunctions, their causes and what number of ammunition per magazine when malfunction has occurred each set;

4) After firing each set, allow the pistol to cool down for five (5) minutes. Swabbing of the barrel is allowed;

39

5) Field strip, clean and lubricate the weapon after every one thousand (1000) rounds of firing for a duraion of ten (10) minutes only;

6) Repeat the procedure until the pistol has consumed the required number of ammunition;

7) Stop the test when malfunctions or stoppages have exceeded 2.5% (97.5% reliability mark) of the total 5000 rounds.

8) Replacement of part(s) is not allowed.

e. Standard:

1) Malfunctions or stoppages exceeding 97.5% reliability mark is classified as critical and shall mean automatic rejection.

2) Evidence of crack or blown barrel or slide or frame is automatically classified as critical and shall mean automatic rejection.

8. Proof Load Test (Shall follow immediately ten (10) minutes after the Endurance Test

a. Purpose:

To determine resistance of the weapon when fired using High-Pressure (HP) cartridge tabulated below.

Caliber Minimum Pressure9mm 50,000 psi.45 22,000 psi.40 35,000 psi

b. Material: One (1) high-pressure (HP) cartridge for all types of pistol.

c. Procedure:

1. The pistol will be fired using one (1) round of high-pressure cartridge; and

2. After firing, check the empty cartridge for bulges, splits, rings and other defects that may have been caused by defective barrel.

40

d. Standard:

There must be no split or crack of any manner on the slide or barrel assembly especially at the edge and muzzle and around the hole of the slide stop and barrel link.

C. Phase III (Magnetic Particle Test/Magnaflux)

1. Purpose:

To determine whether the sample weapon has withstood the pressures of firing incurred during or after the series of test which could not be seen or viewed by man’s naked eyes. It uses scientific procedure in determining the presence of cracks or splits.

2. Procedure:

a. After completion of the nine (9) test parameters done chronologically, remove slides and barrels of the pistols from the frame;

b. Mark the sample with masking tape and indicate therein their serial numbers where they belong then place it in a pistol case. Thereafter, seal the pistol case with masking tape and affix signature of all the proponents to preserve its integrity.

c. Bring the slide and barrel to Metals industry Research and Development Center (MIRDC)-DOST for Magnetic Particle Test (Magnaflux Test). This is the 10th or the last parameter for the Eligibility Test and Evaluation.

3. Standard:

The result og the magnaflux test should not contain any presence of cracks or splits. Mere presence of crack or split on any submitted Slides and Barrels, shall mean outrigh rejection of the sample.

POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ACCEPTANCE TEST FOR PISTOLS

A. Comparative Test Analysis

1. Purpose:

To determine the quality of the delivered firearms vis–a–vis the pre-qualified sample.

41

2. Procedure:

Pick at random one (1) pistol each from the delivered and pre-qualified sample and send them both to MIRDC – DOST to determine its material / metal composition.

3. Standard:

Result will render consistency with material / metal composition of the item.

B. Random Sampling

When the comparative Test Analysis conducted by MIRDC obtained favorable results, random sampling wil be done where the delivered items are stored. The sample size for Acceptance Test from the delivered items will be based using the Military Standard 105-E, Normal Inspection Level II (see Table 1).

Procedure:

Pick samples based on the numbers tabulated above at random from the boxes of the delivered firearms.

C. Pre –Firiing Examination

1. Purpose:

Ascertain if the submitted samples conform/comply with the NAPOLCOM approved standard specifications as to weight, dimensions, trigger pull length and force, finish, receiver, muzzle and bore characteristics. It does not include range malfunction and subsequent re –inspection and precaution as required in functional firing.


This non –destructive test shall be performed to determine the overall workmanship and compliance to the standard or approved specificstions in order to ensure safety of its user.


a. Trigger Pull Equipmentb. Gun Oilc. Venier Caliperd. Weighing Scalee. Permanent marker

42

f. Masking Tapeg. Ammunition requirements per Pistol

1) 9mm Pistol – 15 rds 2) Cal. 45 Pistol 7 rds (standard) /13 rds (High Cap)3) Cal. 40 Pistol – 10 rds

4. Procedure:

a. Conduct visual and dimensional inspection by following the test and evaluation sheet form found in inclusion 1 to determine the actual dimensions, weight, firearms characteristics, vis–a–vis NAPOLCOM –approved Standard Specifications

b. Examine the pistols for proper functioning by cocking, putting the safety lever On and Off, dry firing to ensure safety during firing and assure the completeness of the parts.

c. Check the pistols for proper lubrications.

d. Insert fully loaded magazine and fire the pistols to determine its initial operability.

5. Standard:

a. There must be no missing parts;

b. There must be no excessive binding during the movement of the slide into the receiver;

c. It must not fire when set to “SAFE” position;

d. There must be no evidence of burrs and bulge in the bore and or exterior rim of the barrel; and

e. Trigger Pull

Caliber .45 .40 9mmMaximum 6.5 lbs 6.5 lbs 6.0 lbsMinimum 3.0 lbs 3.0 lbs 4.0 lbs

D. Accuracy Test

1. Purpose:

To determine the accuracy of the weapons using machine rest or equivalent:

43

2. Equipment/Material:

a. Machine Rest or equivalentb. Vernier Caliperc. Targer paperd. Calculatore. Trainglef. Ammunition Requirement per Pistol

1) 9mm Pistol – 15 rds2) Cal. 45 Pistol – 15 rds (standard) /15 rds (hig cap)3) Cal .40 Pistol – 10 rds

3. Firers: Only the PNP Technical Team is authorized.

4. Procedure:

a. Pick two (2) pistol at random for Accuracy Test;

b. Using a machine rest or equivalent, the pistol will be fired at range or distance of twenty five (25) meters; and

c. First Five (5) rounds will be fired for zeroing. The remaining ten (10) rounds will be fired for record purposes. Number of hits and their spread/ grouping on the target paper must be recorded.

5. Standard:

The grouping of the ten-round shots must not exceed 6-inch mean radius. Yaw or miss on the target is equivalent to 1-inch mean to be added to the average mean radius of hits on the target.

E. Interchangeability Test

1. Purpose:

To determine the reliability of the pistols when parts from identical pistol are interchanged


a. Tools (hammer, plier, screw driver, dummy pin or pin punch)b. Four target papers per pistolc. Ammunition Requirement per Pistol

44

1) 9mm Pistol – 15 rds2) Cal. 45 Pistol – 7 rds (standard) - 13 rds (hig cap)3) Cal .40 Pistol – 10 rds

3. Procedure:

a. Pick two (2) samples at random.

b. Disassemble the pistols and interchange the named parts following the prescribed schedule:

Nomenclature of Parts Scheduled Movement of Parts from One Pistol to Another

Receiver A→B B→ASlide A→B B→ASafety Lever A→B B→ATrigger A→B B→ARecoil Spring, Guide and/or Plug A→B B→AFiring Pin A→B B→ASlide Stop A→B B→AHammer Bushing (for Cal.45) A→B B→AMain Spring Housing (for Cal.45) A→B B→A

c. Assemble the pistols with parts interchanged; and

d. Insert one fully loaded magazine, then fire.

e. After firing, put the interchanged parts to its original place.

4. Standard:

The pistols must function properly without any binding of moving parts.

F. Acceptance / Rejection:

1. Failure of the representative samples to the Comparative Analysis undertaken by MIRDC-DOST will mean outright rejection of the whole delivery.

2. The results of the above – cited test criteria will be based on the 1.5% of the Acceptance Quality Level (AQL) of Mil Std 105-E, General Inspection Level II (see Table 2).

3. The PNP shall adopt the prescribed sampling plan which could be considered advantageoous to the government.

45


POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ELIGIBILITY TEST FOR RIFLES


1. Purpose:

Ascertain if the submitted samples conform/comply with the NAPOLCOM-approved standard specifications as to weight, dimensions, trigger pull leght and force, finish, receiver, muzzle and bore characteristics. It does not include range malfunction and subsequent re-inspection and safety precaution as required in functional firing.




a. Trigger Pull Equipmentb. Gun Oilc. Vernier Caliperd. Weighing Scalee. Permanent Marker f. Masking Tapeg. Ammunition requirements per Rifle: Thirty (30) rds

4. Procedure:

a. Conduct visual and dimensional inspection by following the test and evaluation sheet form found in Annex “A” to determine the actual dimensions, weight, rifle characteristics, vis-à-vis NAPOLCOM-approved Standard Specifications;

b. Examine the rifle for proper functioning by cocking, putting the safety lever ON and OFF, dry firing to ensure safety during firing and assure the completeness of the parts;

c. Check the rifle for proper lubrication;d. Insert fully loaded magazine and fire the rifle to determine its

initial operability.

46

5. Standard:

a. There must be no missing parts;b. There must be no excessive binding during movement of the

slide into the receiver;c. It must not fire when set to “SAFE” position.d. There must be no evidence of burrs and bulge in the bore and



1. Accuracy Test

a. Purpose: To determine the accuracy of the rifle using machine rest or equivalent.


a. Machine Rest or Equivalentb. Vernier Caliperc. Target Paperd. Calculatore. Trianglef. Ammunition Requirement per Rifle: 75 rounds

c. Firers: PNP Technical Team or Proponent’s supplied shooter(s) are authorized.

d. Procedure:

a. Using a machine rest or equivalent, the rifle will be fired with the following range or distance.

a) 50 metersb) 150 metersc) 200 metersd) 300 meterse) 400 meters

b. First five (5) rounds of each designated distance will be fired for zeroing. The remaining fifty (50) rounds will be fired for record purposes. Number of hits and their spread/grouping on the target paper must be recorded.

e. Standard:

The grouping of the ten-round shots each distance must not exceed 6-inch mean radius. Yaw or miss on the target is equivalent

47

to 1-inch mean radius to be added to the average mean radius of hits on the target.


a. Purpose:

To determine the reliability of the rifle when parts from identical weapons are interchanged.


1) Tools (hammer, plier, screw driver, dummy pin or pin punch, improvised tools)

2) Four target papers per rifle3) Ammunition Requirement per rifle: Thirty (30) rds

c. Procedure:

1) Disassemble the rifle and interchange the named parts following the prescribed schedule:

Nomenclature of PartsScheduled Movement of Parts

from one Rifle to anotherUpper Assembly A→B B→ABolt Carrier A→B B→ACam Pin A→B B→AFiring Pin A→B B→ABuffer Spring A→B B→A

2) Assemble the rifle with-parts interchanged.3) Insert one fully loaded magazine and then fire. 4) After firing, return the interchanged parts to its original

frame

d. Standard: The rifle must function properly without any binding of moving parts


a. Purpose:

To determine the ease of assembly and disassembly of the rifle and the number of parts and its operability after performing disassembly and assembly.

48



2) Ammunition Requirement per rifle: 90 rounds

c. Procedure:

1) Disassemble one (1) rifle.2) Record the number of parts and tools used;3) Assemble the rifle; and4) Insert one (1) fully loaded magazine then fire.

d. Standard:

Rifle must fire without malfunction.

4. Adverse Condition Test (Sand Test, Mud and Water Immersion Test)

a. Purpose:

To determine the reliability (absence of malfunction or stoppages) of the rifle under adverse condition, such as when immersed in mud, water and dust.

b. Equivalent/Materials:


2) Four target papers per rifle3) Ammunition Requirement per rifle: Thirty (30) rds4) Ten (10) kilograms of sieved sand using a #30 wire mesh5) Timer6) 3M Masking Tape7) Mud mixture compose of four and a half (4 ½) kilograms

of garden soil and one (1) kilogram of clean sand with seven and a half (7 ½) liters of water.

8) Electric Fan, 16 inches diameters fan blade9) Weighing Scale10) Basin

c. Procedure for Sand Test

1) The samples shall be cleaned and lubricated lightly

49

2) Insert theh fully loaded magazine to the rifle, chamber load, put the safety lever at “SAFE” position and tape the muzzle end.

3) Put the sand in a sand box.4) Place the rifle inside the sand box in upright position.5) Pour the sand at a rate of three (3) kilograms per minute

through a pole hole while the blower is turned at maximum speed selector for a period of one (1) minute;

6) Repeat steps 4 and 5 by placing the rifle in upside down position;

7) The firer shall clean the rifle, while removing the tape with bare hands and then blow the congestion on the area of action;

8) The rifle will thenn be fired by expending maximum number of rounds of a fully loaded magazine; and

9) Clean the rifle thoroughly.

d. Standard for Sand Test:

The rifle must fire atleast three (3) successive rounds starting from the chamber-loaded round.

e. Procedures for Mud Test

1) The rifle shall be cleaned and oiled lightly;2) Insert the fully loaded magazine to the rifle, chamber load,

put safety lever “SAFE” down position and tape the muzzle end of the rifle to prevent entrance of mud into the bore;

3) Make a mud mixture by mixing four and a half (4.5) kg of garden soil, 1kg of sand and seven a half (7.5) liters of water in the basin;

4) Immerse the rifle completely in the mud for a duration of fifteen (15) seconds;

5) Retrieve the rifle from the basin and clean by wiping it with bare hands and by blowing sharply on the congested area of action;

6) Remove tape, unlock safety and fire; and7) Clean the rifle thoroughly.

f. Standard for Mud Test:

The rifle must fire the chamber loaded round.

g. Procedures for Water Immersion Test

1) The rifle shall be cleaned and lightly oiled;

50

2) Insert fully loaded magazine to the rifle, chamber load, put the safety lever in “SAFE” position and tape the muzzle end of the rifle;

3) Immerse the rifle for one (1) minute in a basin with tap water.

4) Retrieve the rifle;5) Remove tape, unlock safety then fire;6) Clean the rifle thoroughly.

h. Standard for the Water Immersion Test:

The rifle must fire all rounds.


a. Purpose: To detemine the reliability and durability of the magazine.


1) One (1) magazine2) One (1) complete load of ammunition

c. Procedure:

1) Load the magazine with maximum number of rounds.2) Drop the fully loaded magazine freely from a height of five

(5) feet on the concrete floor in two (2) positions:

a) base plate down position; andb) feed lip down position;

3) After dropping, insert magazine to the rifle and fire.

d. Standard: There must be no malfunction and damage to the magazine.

6. Cook-off Test

a. Purpose: To detemine the barrel and metal strength of the rifle if it fires without pulling the trigger (cook-off).


1) Ammunition Requirement: 500 rounds2) Gun Oil3) Bore brush

51

4) Flannel cloth

c. Procedure:

1) Load the magazine with the number of rounds tabulated below.

2) From above table, fire 200 rds continuously and alternately loading the 30 rds and 20 rds magazine capacity.

3) After firing 200 rds, load one (1) 20 rds magazine capacity. Put the rifle in the ground with muzzle pointing at safe place and holding the butt by using the foot. Let the rifle stand for 30 seconds.

4) Record the time when the rifle cook-off.5) Allow the rifle to cool down for 100 minutes.6) Repeat procedures 2, 3 and 4 using 250 rounds if the rifle

does not cook-off.

d. Standard: There must be no malfunction and damage to the rifle.

7. Endurance Test

a. Purpose: To detemine the reliability of the under prolonged firing condition. This could be measured by the number of malfunctions, number of parts that become unserviceable and the variation in accuracy and muzzle velocity.


1) Ammunition Requirement: 5,000 rounds2) Gun Oil3) Bore brush

200 Rounds 250 RoundsMagazine Capacity

Number of Magazine

Magazine Capacity

Number of Magazine

30 4 30 520 4 20 5

52

4) Flannel cloth

c. Estimated Duration of Test – Sixteen (16) hours only (8:00am-12noon and 1:00pm-5:00pm)

d. Procedure:

1) The rrifle must be fired with the required number of ammunition as tabulated in the Endurance Test Sheet Forms found in Annex “B”;

2) It shall be fired with 50 rounds per set in rhythm of slow firing and rapid interval tabulated below;

Magazine Capacity

Alloted Time per MagazineChange

MagSlow Firing Rapid Firing

30 10 sec 30 sec per mag

20 sec per mag

20 10 sec 20 sec per mag

15 sec per mag

3) Record the malfunctions, their causes and at what number of ammunition in magazine when malfunction occurred in each set;

4) After firing each set, allow the rifle to cool ddown for five (5) minutes. Swabbing of the barrel is allowed;

5) Field strip, clean and lubricate the rifle after every 1000 rounds of firing for a duration of ten (10) minutes only;

6) Repeat the procedure until the rifle has consumed the required number of ammunition.

7) Stop the test when malfunctions or stoppages have exceeded 2.5% (97.5% reliability mark) of the total 5000 rounds.

8) Replacement of part(s) is not allowed.

e. Standard:

1) Malfunctions or stoppages exceeding 97.5% reliability mark is classified as critical and shall mean automatic rejection.

2) Evidence of crack or blown barrel or any moving parts is automatically classified as critical and shall mean automatic rejection.

8. Proof Load Test (Shall follow immediately ten (10) minutes after the Endurance Test)

53

a. Purpose:

To determine resistance of the rifle when fired using High Pressure (HP) cartridge: (70,000 psi – minimum pressure)

b. Material:

One (1) high pressure (HP) cartridge for all types of rifle.

c. Procedures:

1) The rifle will be fired using one (1) round of high pressure cartridge; and

2) Afte firing, check empty cartridge for bulges, splits, rings, and other defects that may have been caused by defective barrel.

d. Standard:

There must be no split or crack of any manner on the upper and lower assembly of the rifle.

C. Phase III (Magnetic Particle Test/Magnaflux)

1. Purpose:

To determine whether the sample rifle has withstood the pressures of firing incured during or after a series of test which could not be seen or viewed by man’s naked eyes. It uses scientific procedure in determining the presence of cracks or splits.

2. Procedure:

a. After completion of the eight (8) test parameters done chronoloogucally, separate the lower, upper assembly and bolt assembly in its parts;

b. Mark the barrels with masking tape and indicate therein serial numbers of rifle where they belong then place them in a rifle case. Thereafter, seal the rifle case with masking tape and affix signature of all the proponents to preserve their integrity;

c. Bring the Upper Receiver and Bolt Carrier to Metals Industry Research and Development Center (MIRDC) –DOST for the Magnitec Particles Test (Magnaflux Test). This is the 9th or the last test parameters for the Eligibility Test and Evaluation.

54

3. Standard:

The result of the MAgnaflux test should not contain any presence of cracks or splits. Mere presence of crack or split on any submitted item(s) shall mean outright rejection of the sample.

POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ACCEPTANCE TEST FOR RIFLES

A. Comparative Test Anallysis

1. Purpose:

To determine the quality of the delivered rifle(s) vis-à-vis the pre-qualified sample

2. Procedure:

Pick at random one (1) rifle each from the delivered and pre –qualified sample then, send them both to MIRDC–DOST to determine their material/metal composition.

3. Standard:

Result must render consistency in material/metal composition of the items.

B. Random Sampling

1. When the Comparative Test Analysis conducted by MIRDC obtained favorable results, random sampling will be done where the delivered items are stored. The sample size for Acceptance Test from the delivered items will be based using the Military Standard 105 –E, Normal Inspection Level II (see Table 1).

Procedure: Pick samples at random based on the numbers tabulated above from the boxes of the delivered firearms.

C. Pre –firing Examination

1. Purpose:

Ascertain if the submitted samples conform/comply with the NAPOLCOM –approved standard specifications as to weigth, dimensions, trigger pull length and force, finish, receiver, muzzle and bore

55

charactiristics. It does not include range malfunction and subsequent re –inspection and safety precaution as required in functional firing.


This non –destuctive test shall be performed to determine the overall workmanship and compliance to the standard or approved specifications in order to ensure safety of its user.


a. Trigger Pull Equipmentb. Gun Oil c. Venier Caliperd. Weighing Scalee. Permanent Markerf. Masking Tapeg. Ammunition reqiuirements per rifle: 30 rds

4. Procedure:

a. Conduct visual and dimenstional inspection by following the test and evluatiom sheet from found in Annes “A” to determine the actual dimensions, weight, firearms charactiristics, vis –a –vis NAPOLCOM –approved Standard Specifications;

b. Examine the rifle for proper functioning by cockimg, putting the safety On and Off, dry firing to ensure safety during and assure the completeness of the parts;

c. Check the rifle for proper lubrication;d. Insert fully loaded magazine and fire to determine its initial

operability.

5. Standards:

a. There must be no missing parts.b. There must be no excessive binding during movement of the

slide into the receiver.

c. It must not fire when set to “SAFE” positiond. There must be no evidence of burrs and bulge in the bore and


D. Accuracy Test

56

1. Purpose: To determine the accuracy of the rifle using machine rest or equivalent.

2. Equipment/Material

a. Machine Rest or equivalentb. Vernier caliperc. Target paperd. Calculatore. Trianglef. Ammunition Requirement per Rifle: 75 rds

3. Firers: Only the PNP Technical Team is authorized

4. Procedures:

a. Pick two (2) rifles at random for Accuracy Test.b. Using a machine rest or equivalent, the rifle will be fired with

the at range or distance using. First five (5) rounds will be fired for each designated distance for zeroing. The reamaining fifty (50) rounds will be fired for record purposes. Numbers of hits and their spread/grouping on the target paper must be recorded.

1) 50 meters2) 150 meters3) 200 meters4) 300 meters5) 400 meters

c. Standard: The grouping of the ten-round shots must not exceed 6-inch mean radius. Yaw or miss on the target is equivalent to 1-inch mean radius to be added to the average mean radius of hits on the target.

E. Intechangeability Test

1. Purpose:

To determine the reliability of the rifle when parts from identical rifle are interchanged.


a. Tools (hammer, plier, screw driver, dummy pin or pin punch)

57

b. Four target papers per riflec. Ammunition Requirement per rifle

3. Procedures:

a. Pick two (2) samples at random.b. Disassemble the rifle and interchange the named parts

following the prescribed schedule:

Nomenclature of PartsScheduled Movement of Parts from one Rifle

to anotherUpper Assembly A→B B→ABolt Carrier A→B B→ACam Pin A→B B→AFiring Pin A→B B→ABuffer Spring A→B B→A

c. Assemble the rifle with parts interchanged.d. Insert one fully loaded magazine and then fire.e. After firing, return the interchanged parts to its original

assembly.

4. Standard:

The rifle must function properly without any binding of moving parts.

F. Acceptance/Rejection:

1. Failure of the representative samples to pass the Comparative Analysis undertaken by MIRDC-DOST will mean outright rejection of the whole delivery.

2. The results of the above-cited test criteria will be based on the 1.5% of the Acceptance Quality Level (AQL) of Mil Std 105-E, General Inspection Level II (see Table 2).

2. The PNPshall adopt the prescribed sampling plan which is advantageous to the government.

58


POLICY IN THE CONDUCT OF ELIGIBILTY AND ACCEPTANCE TESTS FOR ORDINANCE EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES

A. Eligibility Test and Evaluation Parameters for Small Arms (Pistol & Revolvers)

Phase I (Pre-firing Examination)

1. Visual and Dimensional Inspection: This non-destructive test shall be performed to determine the overall workmanship and compliance to the standard or approved specifications in order to ensure safety of its user.

2. Purpose: Establishment requirements to the acceptance quality of weapons to be tested that include among others trigger pull, receiver, muzzle and bore. This precludes range malfunction and subsequent re-inspection and safety precaution as required to functional firing.


3.1 Trigger Pull Equipment3.2 Gun Oil3.3 Caliper3.4 Ammunition requirement for the following

3.4.1 9mm Pistol – 15 rds3.4.2 Cal. 45 Pistol – 7 rds (standard) / 13 rds (high cap)3.4.3 Cal. 38 Revolver – 6 rds

4. Procedure:

4.1 Check the weapons to assure the completeness of the parts and determine correct specified dimension viz-a-viz approved specifications;

4.2 Examine the weapons for proper functioning to prevent accident during firing; and

4.3 Check the weapons for proper lubrication.

59

5. Standard:

5.1 There must be no missing parts.5.2 There must be no excessive bindingduring movement of the

slide into the receiver.5.3 It must not fire when set to “SAFE” position.5.4 There must be no evidence of burrs and bulge in the bore

and or exterior rim of the barrel of the muzzle.5.5 Trigger Pull:

5.5.1 Maximum 6.0 lbs.5.5.2 Minimum 4.0 lbs.

Note: Excess on the given dimensional tolerance of more than 0.005 mm shall not be accepted

Phase II (Firing Examination)

1. Accuracy Test

1.1 Purpose: To determine the accuracy of the wapons using machine rest or equivalent.

1.2 Equipment / Material:

1.2.1 Machine Rest or equivalent1.2.2 Caliper1.2.3 Target paper1.2.4 Calculator1.2.5 Triangle1.2.6 Ammunition Requirement

1.2.6.1 9mm Pistol - 15 rds1.2.6.2 Cal. 45 pistol – 15 rds ( standard) / 16 rds

(high cap1.2.6.3 Cal. 38 Revolver – 15 rds

1.3 Procedure:

1.3.1 Using a machine rest or equivalent, first five (5) rounds will be fired for zeroing.

1.3.2 The remaining ten (10) rounds will be fired for record purposes. Number of hits and their sspread/grouping on the paper must be noted.

1.4 Standard: The weapon i.e. FAs will be fired at range or distance of twenty five (25) meters. The grouping must not exceed six (6) inches mean radius. Yaw or miss on the target is equivalent to one and one half (1 ½) inches mean radius to be added to the average mean radius of hits on the target.

60


2.1 Purpose: To determine the reliability of the weapons when parts from identical pistol are interchanged.

2.2 Equipment/Materials:

2.2.1 Tools2.2.2 Four target paper2.2.3 Calculator2.2.4 Measuring Device2.2.5 Ammunition Requirement

2.5.1 9mm Pistol – 15 rds2.5.2 Cal. 45 pistol – 7 rds (standard) – 13 rds (high

cap)2.5.3 Cal. 38 Revolver – 12 rds

2.3 Procedure:2.3.1 Two (2) identical weapons shall be dissassembled and

the following parts to be interchanged:

2.3.1.1 Receiver2.3.1.2 Slide2.3.1.3 Safety Gripper2.3.1.4 Trigger2.3.1.5 Recoil Spring Plug2.3.1.6 Barrel2.3.1.7 Firing Pin2.3.1.8 Slide Stop2.3.1.9 Hammer Bushing2.3.1.10 Main Spring Housing

2.3.2 Assemble the interchanged parts and the fire one fully loaded magazine with ammunition.

2.3.3 Standard: The two (2) weapons must function properly without any bending of moving parts. It should hit the target area at a distance of twenty-five (25) meters. Note the grouping in comparison to its former shot group.

3. Maintaniability Test

3.1 Purpose: To determine the ease and speed assembly and disassembly of the weapon and the number of parts from the weapon from the maintenance standpoint.


61

3.2.1 Different tools (hammer, plier, screw driver & pins)3.2.2 Timer3.2.3 Ammunition Requirement

3.2.3.1 9mm Pistol 15 rds3.2.3.2 Cal. 45 pistol 7 rds (standard) – 13 rds (high

cap)32.3.3 Cal. 38 Revolver 6 rds

3.3 Procedure:

3.3.1 Dissassemble and assemble the weapon and record the time, (To be done three (3) times); and

3.3.2 Dissassemble the weapon and record the number of parts.

3.4 Standard:

3.4.1 Note/record the average time spent and tools used.3.4.2 Pistol must fire without malfunction.

4. Adverse Condition Test (Sand Test & Mud Test)

4.1 Purpose: To determine the reliability (absence of malfunction or stoppages) of the weapon under adverse condition, such as when immersed in mud and dust.

4.2 Equipment/Material:

4.2.1 Ammunition Requirement4.2.1.1 9mm Pistol - 30 rds4.2.1.2 Cal. 45 pistol - 14 rds (standard) / 26 rds (high

cap)4.2.1.3 Cal. 38 Revolver - 12 rds

4.2.2 Gun Oil4.2.3 Sand Box4.2.4 Nine (9) lbs of sieved sand using a mesh sieve4.2.5 Timer4.2.6 Masking tabe (1”)

4.2.7 Mud mixture ten (10) lbs of garden soil and two (2) lbs of clean sand with eight (8) quarts of water.

4.2.8 Electric Fan or Industrial Fan with sixteen (16) inches fan blade.

4.2.9 Measuring Cup

62

4.3 Procedures:

a. Sand Test

4.3.a.1 The weapon shall be cleaned and lubricated lightly;4.3.a.2 It shall be loaded with maximum number of rounds of

the magazine and the safety lock be placed ts “SAFE” position and muzzle taped.

4.3.a.3 Put the loaded magazine to the pistol with chamber load;

4.3.a.4 Place the weapon in the dust box in upside down position, for one (1) minute and reverse position for another one (1) minute.

4.3.a.5 Mix the dust containing nine (9) lbs of grade zero (0) sand with one (1) lb silica core sand which passed 100% through a thirty (30) mesh sieve.

4.3.a.6 Pour this mixture at a rate of five (5) lbs per minute through pole hole while blower is turned at handled speed of sixty (60) rpm or use electric fan at maximum speed selector. Pouring shall be atleast six (6) inches above the basin or container with equal pouring of sand.

4.3.a.7 The fier shall clean the pistol with bare hands and then blow sharply on the congested area of action.; and

4.3.a.8 The weapon then will be fired at maximum number of rounds of the magazine full load.

b. Mud Test

4.3.b.1 The weapon shall be cleaned and oiled lightly and muzzled taped to prevent entrance of mud into the bore;

4.3.b.2 The weapon loaded with maximum number of rounds of the magazine at safe position immersed completely in the mud for a duration of fifteen (15) seconds;.

4.3.b.3 Mud mixture shall be made in the proportion of ten(10) lbs of garden soil and two (2) lbs of sand with eight (8) quarts of water;

4.3.b.4 Retrieve the weapon from the basin and clean by wiping with bare hands and by blowing sharply at the congested area of action;

4.3.b.5 Remove tape, unlock safety and fire the total number of ammunition; and

63

4.3.b.6 Standard: The weapon must fire satisfactorily the chamber loaded round and without any malfunctions or stoppages.

5. Weapon Drop and Safety Test

5.1 Purpose: To determine the reliability, quality and safety characteristic of the weapon when dropped on a concrete floor.


5.2.1 One (1) dummy round5.2.2 Ammunition Requirements

5.2.2.1 9mm Pistol - 15 rds5.2.2.2 Cal. 45 pistol 7 rds (standard /13 rds (high

cap)5.2.2.3 Cal. 38 Revolver - 6 rds

5.3 Procedure:

5.3.1 The pistol will be loaded with dummy ammunition. Powders were removed retaining the primer.

5.3.2 Load the dummy round and insert the magazine containing fully loaded with ammunition.

5.3.3 Drop the weapon from a height of five (5) feet with the following positions;5.3.3.1 Horizontally upside down (free fall)5.3.3.2 Vertically grip-side down (free fall); and

5.3.4 After dropping test, remove magazine, it shall be inspected for external damage. Load the weapon and fire the remaining ammunition.

5.4 Standard:

5.4.1 The hammer must not fall to battery position;5.4.2 It must be able to fire the remaining ammunition to

determine its proper functioning.5.4.3 The pistol shall be at hammer cock position;5.4.4 The decocker shall be used if the pistol has this

feature; and5.4.5 Evidence of crack/split on barrel or slide or frame is

classified as critical defect and must not continue the test.

64


6.1 Purpose: To determine the reliability and durability of the magazine.

6.2 Equipment/Materials:6.2.1 One (1) Magazine6.2.2 Fifteen (15) rounds ammunition

6.3 Procedure: Drop the fully loaded magazine freely from height of five (5) feet on the concrete floor in two (2) positions; upright and bottoms up;

6.4 After dropping, insert magazine to weapon and fire all rounds; and

6.5 Standard: There must be no malfunction and damage to the magazine.

7. Endurance Test

7.1 Purpose: To determine the reliability of the weapon under prolonged firing condition. This could be measured by the number of malfunctions, number of parts that become unserviceable and the variation in accuracy and muzzle velocity.

IV.2 Equipment/Materials:

IV.2.1 Ammunition RequirementIV.2.1.1 Five Thousand (5,000) rounds for Rifle and

Submachine GunIV.2.1.2 Five Thousand (5,000) rounds for PistolIV.2.1.3 One Thousand Five Hundred (1,500) rounds

for Revolver

IV.2.2 Gun OilIV.2.3 Bore brushIV.2.4 Flannel clotheIV.2.5 Electric fan 16” blade

Note: Generator and industrial fan is prohibited.

IV.3 Estimated Duration of Test – eight (8) hours only (1 whole day)

IV.4 Procedure (Option 1):

65

IV.4.1 Each weapon must be fired with the required number of ammunition;

IV.4.2 It shall be fired in rhythm of slow firing and rapid firing interval;

IV.4.3 Record the malfunctions, their causes and what number of ammunition when malfunction occurred;

IV.4.4 Allow the weapon to cool for five (5) minutes after firing at minimum of one hundred fifty (150) rounds except for revolver wherein firing is done at minimum of fifty (50) rounds. Swabbing off the barrel is allowed;

IV.4.5 Clean and lubricate after firing one thousand (1000) rounds for ten (10) minutes only; and

IV.4.6 Repeat the procedure until the weapon has consumed the required number of ammunition.

IV.5 Procedures: (Option 2 – using 3000 ds instead of 5000 rds):

IV.5.1 Each weapon must be fired with the required number of ammunition;

IV.5.2 It shall be fired in rhythm of slow firing and rapid firing interval;

IV.5.3 Record the malfunctions, their causes and what number of ammunition when malfunction occurred;

IV.5.4 Allow the weapon to cool for five (5) minutes sfter firing at minimum of one hundred fifty (150) rounds. Swabbing off the barrel is allowed;

IV.5.5 After firing one thousand (1000) rounds, the weapon will be fired with one (1) high-pressured ammunition (Minimum of 27.5% additional pressure);

IV.5.6 Clean and lubricate after firing one thousand (1000) rounds of ammunition plus one (1) high-pressure ammunition for ten (10) minutes only;

IV.5.7 After firing the high-pressure ammunition, check the empty cartridge for bulges, splits, rings, and other defects that may be caused by defective barrel;

IV.5.8 Repeat the procedure until the weapon has consumed the required number of ammunition (3000 rds-combat load ammo and 3 rds-high pressure ammo).

IV.6 Procedure (Option 3 – Excessive Pressure Test)

IV.6.1 The excessive pressure test is intended to determine the pressure at which the gun assembly is likely to fail catastrophically from the firing of a cartridge.

66

IV.6.2 Cartridges intentionally loaded to develop incrementally increasing pressures, in excess of PROFF pressures, are to be fired in accordance with the schedule of Table II until the gun assembly catastrophically fails or until the maximum pressure of Table II is fired without catastrophic failure.

IV.6.3 All firings are to be from the same – but randomly selected-chamber in a multiple chambered gun.

Maximum Allowable AveragePressure of Service Loads

Proof PressuresMinimum Maximum

20,000 and under (a) 1.16 times a 1.7 times a20,100 to 35,000 (b) 1.16 times b 1.6 times b35,000 or over (c) 1.16 times c 1.5 times c

Maximum ProofPressure

Excessive Pressures Firings

StartIncremental Increases

Maximum

20,000 or less Maximum Proof 5,000 4.5 times max proof

20,100 to 30,000 Maximum Proof 5,000 3.5 times max proof



50,100 or more Maximum Proof 5,000 2.0 times max proof

67

IV.6.4 The failure pressure determined by these may be somewhat misleading in that the firings of excessive but less than catastrophic pressures may have severely pre-stressed the gun.

IV.6.4.1 In order to confirm the results of this test, another unfired sampling is to be continually fired at the catastrophic failure pressures determined with the first sampling until catastrophic failure is produced or until five such firings (per gun) fail to produce catastrophic failure;

IV.6.4.2 All firings are to be from the same-but randomly selected-chamber in a multiple chambered gun;

IV.6.4.3 During both phases of this test only those repairs or component replacements required to enable the gun to be fired will be made;

IV.6.4.4 Such repairs and replacements will generally be limited to the firing pin, hammer, trigger and other minors parts;

IV.6.4.5 No component or assembly whose principal or secondary function is the containment of the internal pressures (Slide, bolt, barrel, receiver or frame) is to be replaced or repaired during these tests.

IV.7 Standard:

IV.7.1 Malfunctioning is classified minorIV.7.2 Replacement of part (Any parts of the weapon except

Barrel and Slide) is allowed.

IV.7.2.1 Replacement of one (1) or two (2) unserviceable parts is classified as minor.

IV.7.2.2 Replacement of three (3) unserviceable parts is classified as a major defect.

IV.7.2.3 Replacement of more than three (3) unserviceable parts is classified as a critical defect.

IV.7.3 Blown barrel or slide or frame is automatically classified as critical and must not continue the test. In the event that the malfunctioning is classified critical the weapon must be rejected; and

68

IV.7.4 Evidence of crack or split on barrel or slide or frame is also classified as critical defect and must not continue the test.

IV.8 There shall be no cleaning of weapon other than prescribed by paragraph 5.4 and 5.5 this parameter.

8 Proof Load Test

8.1 Purpose: To determine resistance of the weapon when fired using high-pressure (hp) cartridge.

Example:

Caliber Maximum Pressure9 mm 50,000 psi.38 / .45 22,000 psi5.56 mm 70,000 psi7.62 mm 67,500 psi.50 inch 65,000 psi

8.2 Material: One (1) high pressure (hp) cartridge for all types of weapon.

8.3 Procedure:

8.3.1 The weapon will be fired using one (1) round of high pressure cartidge; and

8.3.2 After firing, check the empty cartridge for bulges, splits, rings, and other defects that maybe caused by defective barrel.

8.4 Standard: There must be no inclusion or cracks of any manner at the barrel assembly especially at the edge of the chamber and the muzzle and the hole of the slide stop and barrel link.

Phase III (Magnetic Particle Test/Magnaflux)

1. Purpose: To determine whether the sample weapon i.e. firearm has withstood the pressures of firing incurred during or afte a series of test which could not be seen or viewed by man’s naked eyes by using scientific procedure in determining the presence of cracks or splits.

2. Procedure:

69

2.1 After completin of the nine (9) test parameters done chronologically, remove slides and barrels of weapon from the frame.

2.2 Seal and write the serial numbers.2.3 Bring the slide and barrel to Metals Industry Research and

Development Center (MIRDC) – DOST for the Magnetic Particles Test (Magnaflux Test). This is the 10th or the last test parameter of the Eligibility Test and Evaluation.

3. Standard: The result of the magnaflux test should not contain any presence of cracks or splits. Mere presence of crack or split to any submitted Slides and Barrels, the pistol subject of Test is deemed classified as FAILED.

B. Eligibility Test and Evaluation Parameters for Shoulder Weapons

1. Pre-Firing Examinations (30 rds)

1.1 Procedure:

1.1.1 Check the weapon to assure the completeness of parts and determine correct specified dimensions; and

1.1.2 Examine the weapon for proper functioning in order to assure that no hazard exists during firing.

PropertiesSpecifications/ Features

Observation Remarks

a) Weightb) Measurementc) Trigger Pulld) Safetye) Muzzle Brakers/Flash

Suppressorf) Rifling Twistg) Sight Adjustmenth) Ability to fire rifle

Grenade (Optional)i) Others

2. Accuracy Test (35 rds)

2.1 Procedure:

2.1.1 Ten (10) rounds of ammunition shall be fired from the rifle at a range of 50 and 100 meters using machine rest or equivalent;

2.1.2 This test will be done 3x to get the average; and

70

2.1.3 Zeroing shall be done in any positions using five (5) rounds of ammunition.

2.2 Standard: Shall exceed an extreme spread of six (6) inches mean radius.

3. Combat Accuracy (50 rds)

3.1 Procedure: The firer shall fire or shoot the rifle on different positions at distance of 25 meters, as indicated below:

a) Zeroing - 10 rdsb) Prone Position 25 meters - 10 rds

(Unsupported) 1.5” MRc) Prone Position 25 meters - 10 rds

(Supported) 1.5” MRd) Standing 25 meters - 10 rds

(Unsupported) 1.5” MRe) Standing 25 meters - 10 rds

(Supported) 1.5” MR

4. Rate of aimed Fire (30 rds)

4.1 Procedure: Fire the weapon at a distance of 25 meters rapid firing as fast as the firer can do; and

4.2 Note and Record the number of shots and the hits on the target.

5. Cyclic Rate of Fire (90 rds)

5.1 Procedure: Thirty (30) rounds of ammunition shall be in full automatic mode of fire;

5.2 Record the time consumed using chronograph machine or a timer; and

5.3 Repeat three (3x) and rate the average.

6. Drop Safety Test (30 rds)

6.1 Procedure: Load the weapon in the chamber with blank Ammo or dummy round.

6.2 Put safety lever in “SAFE” position.6.3 Insert the magazine loaded with 30 rounds of ammunition in

the magazine well.

71

6.4 Drop the weapon on a hard surface from the height of 1.5 meters horizontally and upright from a height of 2 meters vertically butt down. (Note: Blank Ammo should have no dent on the primer then fire 30 rds).

7. Maximum Effective Range (60 rds)

7.1 Procedure: Fire the weapon at a distance of 300 to 350 meters for M193 and 600 to 800 for SS109/M855 ammunition using steel helmet as a target or a ¼ inch thick steel plate (1.5”x1.5”);

7.2 Inspect the helmet or target for evidence of penetration after the hit is registered;

7.3 During firing, firer can use any position desired to support the weapon; and

7.4 This sequence will be repeated using M193 or any authorized Ammo.

8. Anti-Cook Off Test (300 rds)

8.1 Procedure: Fire 300 rounds of Ammo in automatic mode (the 300 rds increment will be fired using 15 magazines loaded with 20 rds each within four minutes);

8.2 Place one (1) loaded magazine in the rifle;8.3 Immediately chamber one (1) round and place the selector

lever to “safe” position; and8.4 Place and secure the weapon on the ground with the muzzle

pointing down range and observe.

NOTE: The weapon must not fire or cook-off within five (5) minutes starting from the time when one (1) round was chambered.

9. Adverse Condition:

a) Dust Exposure Test: (60 rounds)

9.a.1 Procedure: Clean and slightly oil the weapon;9.a.2 Insert a fully loaded 30 rounds capacity magazine;9.a.3 Chamber one (1) round;9.a.4 Put safety lever on safe position;9.a.5 Place it in a dust box with a mixture of nine (9) grade

O sand and one (1) lb clean core sand which had passed 100% through a grade 30 mesh sieve, 80% through a grade of 50 mesh sieve, and ¾% through grade 100 mesh sieve;

9.a.6 Turn on the blower at a speed of 60 RPM;

72

9.a.7 Pour dust or sand for a duration of one (1) minute each position (top side and upside down) at a rate of 5 lbs per minute;

9.a.8 Wipe the weapon with bare hands then blow it sharply on the congested areas;

9.a.9 Ten (10) rounds of ammunition will be fired in semi-automatic mode while the remaining twenty (20) rds in full automatic mode;

9.a.10 Inspect the rifle for any damage; and9.a.11 Repeat the test three (3x) times.

b) Water Immersion Test (60 rds)

9.b.1 Procedure: Clean and highly oil the weapon;9.b.2 Immerse the unloaded weapon in tap H2O for five (5)

minutes;

9.b.3 Wiping the weapon with bare hands and blowing sharply on the congested is allowed;

9.b.4 Insert a fully loaded 30 rounds capacity magazine;9.b.5 Ten (10) rounds of ammunition will be fired in semi-

automatic mode while the remaining twenty (20) rounds in full automatic mode;

9.b.6 Inspect the rifle for any damage; and9.b.7 Repeat the test three (3x) times.

c) Mud Immersion Test (60 rds)

9.c.1 Procedure: Clean and lightly oil the weapon;9.c.2 Put masking tape on the muzzle to exclude the mud

from entering the bore of the rifle;9.c.3 Insert a fully loaded 30 rounds capacity magazine;9.c.4 Chamber one (1) round;9.c.5 Put safety lever on safe position;9.c.6 Immersed it for 15 seconds in a mixture of 20 lbs of

red clay, 4 lbs of clean river sand and 26 quarts of H2O;

9.c.7 Remove the tape from the muzzle;9.c.8 Wipe the weapon with bare hands then blow sharply

on the congested areas’9.c.9 Ten (10) rounds will be fired in semi-automatic mode

while the remaining twenty (20) rounds in full automatic mode;

9.c.10 Inspect for any damage after firing; and9.c.11 Repeat the test three (3x) times.

10. Hit Dispersion Test

73

10.1 Procedure: Using Machine rest or its equivalent and 20 rounds of SS109 ammunition or its equivalent, fire the weapon at one (1) second interval on one (1) IPSC target board at a distance of 50 meters;

10.2 Determine the mean point of impact (MPI);10.3 Graph and record the maximum deviation from the MPI;10.4 Repeat this sequence using M193 ammunition; and10.5 Compute the average of two tests and use it in scoring.

11. Area Target Capability

11.1 Procedure: Fire 30 rounds using M193 ammunition in three (3) burst mode fire on a 2.5x2.5 meters (plywood 1/2) target at 300 meters.

11.2 Repeat three (3x) times.

NOTE: Firer can use any position. Sandbag or bipod can used as a rest. The average of two (2) test will be computed and be used in scoring.

12. Endurance Test

12.1 Procedure: The rifle will be subjected to a destructive examination to test its integrity before any firing will be done;

12.2 Hit dispersion and integrity test will be conducted every after 1000 rounds;

12.3 Two Hundred (200) rounds increment will be fired using Ten (10) magazines filled with twenty (20) rounds within 10 minutes;

12.4 The first 20 rds will be fired in automatic mode followed by 20 rounds in sustained mode, then 20 rounds in automatic mode and so on until 200 rounds had been fired;

12.5 A Ten (10) minutes cooling time is allowed between increments;

12.6 Cleaning, lubricating and inspecting will be 30 minutes;12.7 The test will be repeated until 5,000 rounds had been fired;12.8 Replacement of two (2) defective parts is allowed either of the

following: charging handle, extractor, firing pin, bolt carrier, pin, trigger, hammer; and

12.9 More than two (2) replacement of parts is considering failed.

C. Eligibility Test and Evaluation Parameters for Rifle 5.56mm Magazine, Box-type (Aluminum/Plastic)

74

1. GENERAL. The test and evaluation to determine the performance, functional reliability and quality of the magazine subject to PNP study and acquisition.

2. SCOPE. The test and evaluation for magazine box type covers all types of magazines for rifle and pistol whether plastic, aluminum and steel.

3. OBJECTIVE. To determine the material quality, duability and functional reliability of the magazine.

4. SAMPLING PLAN: MIL-STD 105D/E

Single Sampling, Normal InspectionAcceptance Quality Level (AQL)

Critical Defect 0.0Major Defect 6.5Minor Defect 15.0

Sample Size: 20 pieces (RANDOM from 50 pieces submitted samples)

5. PRE-FUNCTIONAL TEST

5.1 Loading of Maximum Capacity

5.1.1 Procedure: Subject 20 magazine fully loaded with ammunition

5.1.2 Requirements:5.1.1.1 Ammunition5.1.1.2 Magazine

5.1.3 Standard: 20 pieces fully loaded magazines must accommodate the maximum number of ammunition capacity as specified.

5.2 Magazine Insertion and locking test.

5.2.1 Procedure: Subject 20 fully loaded magazine for insertion and lock to the magazine well of the riffle/pistol

5.2.2 Requirements:5.2.2.1 Ammunition

75

5.2.2.2 Firearms5.2.2.3 Magazines

5.2.3 Standard: Magazine must be easily inserted and locked in the magazine well of riffle/pistol and must not fall without pressing the magazine release lever.

5.3 Manual Stripping Test.

5.3.1 Procedure: Subject 20 fully loaded magazine and strip of rounds manually using the charging handle/cocking lever/slide.

5.3.2 Requirement:5.3.2.1 Ammunition5.3.2.2 Firearms5.3.2.3 Magazine

5.3.3 Standard: All rounds must be stripped easily and the bolt must be in “open bolt” position after the last rounds.

6. FUNCTION FIRING TEST:

6.1 Procedure: Subject 20 fully loaded magazines and fire all rounds changing from semi-automatic to automatic made of fire for every five (5) rounds.

6.2 Requirements:6.2.1 Ammunition6.2.2 Firearms6.2.3 Magazine

6.3 Standard: All must be able to feed all rouds to the riffle of pistol magazine without malfunction or stoppage and must render the bolt “OPEN BOLT” position after last round is fired.

7. CHEMICAL RESISTANCE TEST

7.1 Procedure: Subject 2 empty magazines from immersion and both with cleaning solution for six (6) days (144hrs)

7.1.1 Any of the five (5) solutions will be used.

7.1.1.1 Cleaning Material per WF 800;7.1.1.2 Cleaning Material per MIL-L 212660;7.1.1.3 Naptha;

76

7.1.1.4 Gasoline; and

7.1.1.5 A mixture of a 7% mineral oil (viscosity 40 – 60 cantistrokes at 100 degrees Fahrenheit and viscocity of 60 – 70, 13.5 percent olele acid and 1.5 percent friethanclamine)

7.2 Requirement:

7.2.1 Timer7.2.2 Chemical bath as enumerated7.2.3 Magazine

7.3 Standard: There must be no chemical alternation on the magazine after six (6) days 144 hrs of immersion and clearing selection.

8. SALT SPRAY TEST

8.1 Procedure: Subject 3 empty magazines to salt spray inside a salt spray chamber for 24 hrs.

8.2 Requirement:8.2.1 Timer 8.2.2 Salt spray chamber8.2.3 Magazine

8.3 Standard: Ther must be no evidence of corrosion or rust on the magazine.

9. HIGH TEMPERATURE TEST

9.1 Procedure: Subject 2 empty magazines to high temperature at 60 degrees centigrade for four (4) hrs.

9.2 Requirements:9.2.1 Timer9.2.2 Low temperature9.2.3 Magazine (refer to pg7)

9.3 Standard: There must be no evidence of deformation on the magazine after heated at 60 degrees centigrade for 4 hrs.

10. DROP TEST

77

10.1 Procedure:

10.1.1 Subject four (4) fully loaded magazines to be dropped from a height of five (5) feet (1.52 M) onto a concrete floor.

10.1.2 Each magazine shall be dropped once on the following position enumerated below:10.1.2.1 Fed lip downward10.1.2.2 Base down10.1.2.3 Left side downward10.1.2.4 Right side downward

10.1.3 It shall be fired in semi-automatic and automatic mode.

10.2 Requirements:10.2.1 Ammunition10.2.2 Drop test fixture10.2.3 Firearms10.2.4 Magazine

10.3 Standard: There must be no evidence of deformation on the magazine after drop test and the riffle must fire without malfunction attributed to magazine defect.

11. MUD TEST

11.1 Procedure: Immersed 2 fully loaded magazines in mud for 1 hour and fire first 3 rounds from the same magazine.

11.2 Mud MixtureGarden Soil – 4.5 kg.Sand - 1.0 kg.Water - 7.5 ltrs.

11.3 Testing Equipment / Material11.1.1 Ammunition11.1.2 Mud Mixture11.1.3 Firearms11.1.4 Magazine

11.4 Standard: The first 3 rounds must fire in semi- automatic and automatic mode.

12. SAND TEST

78

12.1 Procedure: Subject two (2) loaded magazines to go thorough dust coat inside and outside using ordinary dust or with the following formulation;12.1.1 140 grams meshed silica dry sand12.1.2 25 grams meshed dry soil

12.2 Wipe off the dust at the top of the magazine and the first round with bare hands.

12.3 Fire all rounds in the magazine in semi-automatic and automatic mode of firing.

12.4 Testing Equipment / Materials12.1.1 Ammunition12.1.2 Dust12.1.3 Magazine12.1.4 Firearms

12.5 Standard: All rounds from the magazine must fire without malfunction.

13. SPRING COMPRESSION TEST

13.1 Procedure:13.1.1 Load five (5) fully loaded magazines.13.1.2 Set aside for one (1) week.13.1.3 After one (1) week, functionally fire the riffle

with magazines subjected to spring compression test inserted into it.

13.2 Testing Equipment / Materials.13.2.1 Ammunition13.2.2 Firearms13.2.3 Magazine

13.3 Standard: All rounds must fire without stoppage or malfunction.

14. MAGAZINE CATCH TEST

14.1 Procedure:14.1.1 Insert the fully loaded magazine to the

magazine well of the riffle / pistol.14.1.2 Lock and release the magazine.14.1.3 Repeat the procedure 14.1.1 and 14.1.2 until it

is done one hundred (100) times.

79

14.2 Testing Equipment / Materials14.2.1 Ammunition14.2.2 Firearms14.2.3 Magazine

14.3 Standard: All rounds must fire without stoppage or malfunction.

15. ENDURANCE TEST

15.1 Procedure: One thousand rounds shall be fired from the rifle using only one magazine.

15.2 Testing Equipment/Materials15.2.1 Ammunition15.2.2 Firearms15.2.3 Magazine

15.3 Standard: The magazine must stand with prolong firing without damage/deformation stoppage.

D. Eligibility/Accepance Test Parameters for Ammunition

1. Random Sampling

1.1 Eiligibility Test

The sample size for this test is fixed at 800 rounds to be used for the duration of test.

1.2 Acceptance Test:

1.2.1 Cartraged are inspected if the delivery is completed per Purchase Order (PO) and Delivery Receipts (DR).

1.2.2 Sample size will vary depending on the quantity purchased and delivered. (See Sampling Plan and AQL)

2. Visual Inspection

80

Cartridges are inspected visually for defect (see table for calssification of defects) using sampling plan derived from MIL –STD -105D/E.

Standard:

Cartical Defect/Defective : Accept 0/ Reject 1Major Defect/Defective : Aceept 0/ Reject 7Minor Defect/Defective : Accept 11/ Reject 16

3. Dimensional Inspection

Cartridges are inspected are inspected dimensionally using standard gages (see table for classification of defects) with samples indicated in the visual inspection.

Standards:

Major Defect/Defective: Accept 3/ Reject 7Minor Defect/Defective: Accept 11/ Reject 16

4. Bullet Extraction/Pull Test

4.1 The force to extract the bullet from the cartridge case shall not be less than 35 lbs using a sample of twenty five (25) rounds;

4.2 Failure of two (2) or more to comply with the requirements shall cause for the rejection of the lot. If one (1) cartridge fails, a second sampling is permitted; snd

4.3 To be accepted, the number of failures shall not exceed a total of two (2) for the first and second smapling.

5. Residual Stress Test (MNT)

5.1 Using samples of fifty (50) rounds, cartridges are immersed in a Mercurious Nitrate solution for 15 minutes; and

5.2 Cartridge case shall not crack or split.

6. Leak Test

6.1 Using samples of fifty (50) rounds, cartridges are put in a leak test equipment wherein it is filled with water;

6.2 Vacuum for 10 second;6.3 Apply pressure to see if the cartridges will leak; and6.4 Cartridge case shall not release more than one (1) air bubble.

81

Standard : Accept 3/ Reject 10

7. Ballistic Test

7.1 Purpose:

To determine the pressure, velocity and accuracy of ammunition.

7.2 Procedures:

7.2.1 Pressure: The samples randomly taken from the same lot, batch or stock that was visually and dimensionally inspected will be subjected to chamber pressure test and shall not exceed the allowable chamber pressure for each type of caliber; and

7.2.2 Velocity: The samples randomly taken from that same lot, batch or stock that was visually and dimensionally inspected will be subjected to velocity test and shall not be less than the allowable velocity for each type of caliber.

7.2.3 Accuracy: The samples randomly taken from the same lot, batch or stock that was visually and dimensionally inspected will be subjected to accuracy test and shall not be less than the allowable accuracy measured in “mean radius spread” or “mean diagonal spread” for each type of caliber.

8. Function and Casualty Test

8.1 The wepon FAs will be fired using four hundred eighty (480) rounds of ammunition; and

8.2 The cartridge shall function without casualty at ambient temperature.

E. Acceptance Test Procedure for Explosives and Pyrotechnics

1. OBJECTIVES:

1.1 To determine the functions of the smoke grenade, tear gas, flares and explosive:

1.2 To determine the stability of the above –mentioned Class V supplies;

1.3 To determine the stability when subjected to high temperature;

1.4 To determine the stability when dropped on the rough surface; and

82

1.5 To determine the stability when exposed to weather conditions.

2. PROCEDURES:

2.1 SAMPLING:

2.1.1 The members of the NHQ PNP Inspection and Technical Committee will randomly pick –up the prescribed quantity to represent the lot size using the Military Standard 105–D/E as the reference to be subjected for acceptance.

2.1.2 Mark and secure the samples properly.

2.2 These representative sample shall be subjected to the following Tests:

2.2.1 Visual Inspection – all sample (Ref: 105–D or 105–E)

This non-destructive test shall be performed to determine the overall workmanship and compliance to the standard or approved specifications in order to ensure safety of the Smoke Grenade. Tear Gas, Flares and Explosives and its users.

2.2.1.1 Overall Features – all samples2.2.1.1.1 Configuration/Specifications2.2.1.1.2 Packing/Packaging2.2.1.1.3 Dents, crack, deep scratches

2.2.1.2 Missing parts2.2.1.2.1 that affect safety2.2.1.2.2 that affect functioning

2.2.1.3 Markings2.2.1.3.1 Readable;2.2.1.3.2 Nomenclature, lot number, date

loaded and manufacturer’s/product code;

2.2.1.3.3 Marking must not be easily erased;2.2.1.3.4 Body of the item must be properly

marked.

2.2.2 Laboratory and Functional Testing:

83

This non–destructive and field destructive test shall be performed to measure the stability and safety of the items when subjected to simulated field and storage conditions.

2.2.2.1 Workmanship of the finished product will be inspected in accordance to specifications. (Non–Destructive);

2.2.2.2 Temperature Test –finished product will be subjected to the required tenperature (______) to determine the reaction of the mixture;

2.2.2.3 Drop Test – finished product will be inspected after dropping from a height if 5 feet (1.5 meters). All will be fired. (Field Destructive); and

2.2.2.4 Water proof or flash Test – simulated rain showers or submeerging it in the water two (2) inches below the level for twenty five (25) minutes in normal individual package. All will be fired (Field Destructive)

2.2.2.5 Functional Test – finished product will be fired. (Field Destructive)

3. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA:

ACCEPTANCE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL) – the level with designated value of percent defective (or defects per hundred units) by which the consume/ evaluator has indicated will be accepted in accordance to the Acceptance and Sampling Procedure tabulated below:

DEFECTSAQL

LEVEL II–A LEVEL III–ASINGLE SAMPLING

PLANS FOR NORMAL INSPECTION

DOUBLE SAMPLING PLANS FOR

NORMAL INSPECTION

CRITICAL 0.65ACCEPT REJECT ACCEPT REJECT

1 2 0 3MAJOR 2.5 3 4 3 7MINOR 4.0 5 6 5 9

The result of the above acceptance test shall be the basis for the NHQ PNP Inspection and Acceptance Committee in the acceptance of said items(s) for use of the Philippine National Police.

F. Acceptance Test Procedures for Other Ordnance Items/Equipment

1. SAMPLING PLAN FOR ACCEPTANCE TEST

84

Sample size can be determined from MIL STD 105D/E (see Sampling Plan table) depending on the quantity delivered. Normally, Inspection Level II is used. However, inspection Level I may be used when less discrimination is needed or Inspection Level III for greater discrimination. Four Special Inspectin Levels may be used where relatively small sample sizes are necessary and large sampling risks can or must be tolerated.

2. ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION

Sample size using MIL STD 105D/E, there are corresponding Acceptance Quantity Level (AQL) or numbers of units/item to be accepted/rejected.

DEFECTS AQL

Special InspectionLEVEL I–IV

General InspectionLEVEL I–III

SINGLE OF DOUBLE SAMPLING PLANS FOR NORMAL

INSPECTION

SINGLE OR DOUBLE SAMPLING PLANS FOR NORMAL INSPECTION

CRITICALMAJORMINOR

0.02.54.0

ACCEPT REJECT ACCEPT REJECT

3. RANDOM SAMPLING

3.1 This random sampling applies to all items/equipment procured by the PNP.

3.2 Procedure:

3.2.1 Letter from SAO PNP Wide requesting for Technical Inspection;

3.2.2 Schedule the conduct of Random Sampling;3.2.3 Prepare invitation letters/memo to DL, LSS, DC and

End –users for PNP side and/or NAPOLCOM/PS –DBM to witness the acceptance test and random sampling;

3.2.4 Conduct physical inventory and accounting;3.2.5 Pick –up of sample randomly; and3.2.6 Mark and secure the samples properly prior to

acceptance test.

4. VISUAL INSPECTION

85

4.1 This visual inspection applies to all items/equipment procured by the PNP. This non –destructive test shall be performed to determine the overall workmanship and compliance to the standard or approved specifications in order to ensure safety of its user.

4.2 Procedure:

4.2.1 Inspect the item/equipment for completeness as per Purchase Order and Delivery Receipt;

4.2.2 Determine if it conforms to the NAPOLCOM Approved PNP Specifications; and

4.2.3 Record all the data/information and observations.

4.2.3.1 Overall Features –all samples4.2.3.1.1 Configaration/Specifications;4.2.3.1.2 Packing/Packiging; and4.2.3.1.3 Dents, cracks, deep scratches

4.2.3.2 Missing parts4.2.3.2.1 that affect safety; and4.2.3.2.2 that affect functioning

4.2.3.3 Markings

4.2.3.3.1 Readable;4.2.3.3.2 Nomenclature, lot number, date

loaded and manufacturer’s product code;

4.2.3.3.3 Marking must not be easily erased; and

4.2.3.3.4 Body of the item must be properly marked.

5. FUNCTIONAL TEST

A. FIREARMS

A.1 Ammunition Requirement

A.1.1 Total number of ammunition needed in the functional test, multiply the number of samples to the magazine capacity of the firearms;

A1.2 Correction needed in the functional test; andA1.3 Ammunition requirement is equal to the sum of

A.1.1 and A.1.2.

86

A.2 Functional Test

A.2.1 In the firing range, check whether the weapons are functional;

A.2.2 Only the DRD Technical Team and firer authorized by them are allowed to fire the weapon;

A2.3 Fire the weapon in single and automatic mode with the required number of ammunition;

A.2.4 Record the process until all samples are fired. Members of DRD Technical Team are allowed to take pictures and video footing. Others may be allowed with permission from the Team Leader;

A.2.5 If found defective, chieck if the defect is within acceptable level. If the defect is critical, apply rejection and acceptance number; and

A.2.6 In case of rejection, a re –test can be conducted once the items and equipment are replaced.

B. RIFLE GRENADE CTG 40MM AND CTG 40MM LINKED

B1. SAMPLING

Special inspection levels are applies to this kind of ammunition for acceptance due to high cost and risk in testing.

B2. FUNCTIONAL TEST:

Actual functional test shall be conducted to test its brissance power when exploded and its safety as well as arming distance when projected.

B.2.1 In the firing range, check whether the weapon is functional;

B.2.2 Only the DRD Technical Team with EOD Personnel are allowed to conduct the test with the required number of samples and ammunition;

87

B.2.3 Record the process until all samples are fired. Members of DRD Technical Team are allowed to take pictures and video footing. Others may be allowed with permission from the Team Leader;

B.2.4 If found defective, check if the defect is within acceptable level. If the defect is critical, apply rejection/acceptance number;

B.2.5 In case of rejection, a re-test can be conducted once the items and equipment are replaced; and

B.2.6 Before leaving the area, DUD cartridges or grenades must be recovered and destroyed to avoid future accidents.

C. MAGAZINE FOR RIFLE AND PISTOLS

C.1 FUNCTIONAL TEST

Actual functional test shall be conducted on the magazine by insertion, locking and stripping (Aluminum & Plastic)

C.1.1 In the firing range, check whether the items or equipment is functional;

C.1.2 Only the DRD Technical Team and/or firer authorized by them are allowed to conduct the test with the required number of samples and ammunition;

C.1.3 Record the process until all samples are fired. Duly members of DRD Technical Team are allowed to take pictures and video footing. Others may be allowed with permission from the Team Leader;

C.1.4 If found defective, check if the defect is within acceptable number; and

C.1.5 In case of rejection, a re-test can be conducted once the items or equipment are replaced.

D. LAUNCHERS (RIFLE GRENADE/GRENADE/MULTIPLE), SNIPER OPTICS AND OTHER ORDNANCE ITEMS/EQUIPMENT

D.1 FUNCTIONAL TEST

D.1.1 In the firing range or any suitable place/venue for functional testing, check whether the items/equipment is functional;

D.1.2 Only the DRD Technical Team and/or firer/shooters authorized by them are allowed to conduct the test with the required number of samples and ammunition;

D.1.3 Record the process until samples are fired. Duly members of DRD Technical Team are allowed to take

88

pictures and video footing. Others may be allowed with permission from the Team Leader;

D.1.4 I found defective, check if the defect is with acceptable level. If the defect is critical, apply rejection/acceptance number; and

D.1.5 In case of rejection, a re –test can be conducted once the items or equipment are replaced.

Section 2-2 Transportation Section

1.2 Transportation Section

The Transportation Section is one of the three (3) sections in the Weapons, Transportation and Communications Division of the DRD who played a vital role in the procurement process of mobility equipment of the PNP. Currently, this Section simultaneously conducts test and evaluation of patrol cars and motorcycles in response to the need of the PNP Field Units as well as to attain the goal of the PNP to modernize its move capabilities.

1.1.5 DEFINITION OF TERMS:

1. Acceptance Test – a series of test parameters and procedures conducted on delivered equipment/supplies prior to receipt or acceptance by concerned parties aas agreed as stipulated in the contract for the fulfillment of an obligation:

2. Acceleration – the rate of change of velocity with respect to time;3. Acceleration Test – a test to determine the velocity of the vehicle

with respect to time;4. Accredited Testing Institutions – agencies that conduct testing of

sample supplies submitted by proponents;5. Ascending – to go or move upward;6. Ascending Test – a test to determine the capability of the vehicle in

moving upward in an inclined road;7. Bids and Awarrds Committee (BAC) – refers to procuring entity

whether NHQ, the Regional and NSU BACs, the NHQ Negotiation Committee or similar committees in the PNP which procure equipment and materials through public bidding, negotiation, or other modes that should pass NAPOLCOM –approved standard specifications;

8. Brake –a device for reducing or stopping motion on a vehicle especially by contact friction;

9. Camber Alignment – the inward or outward tilt of the tire/wheel assembly;

89

10. Carbon Dioxide – one of two (2) oxides of carbon which is principal product oxide of carbon formed from the combustion of hydrocarbon fuel;

11. Carbon Monoxide – an orderless, tasteless and invisible gas resulting from incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, like kerosene, gasoline, coal, natural gas, etc;

12. Critical Defect – a defect that would result in hazardous or unsafe conditions for individuals using or maintaining a particular equipment; or a defect that will likely prevent performance of the tactical function of a major end item such as weapon, ship, aircraft, vehicle tank, or space vehicle;

13. Critical Defective – a unit product which one or more critical defects, major as well as minor. It includes defective parts that are vital in the functioning of the vehicle and may cause injury to the user;

14. Directorate for Research and Development (DRD) – The Directorial Staff of the PNP tasked to conduct research and development, and test and evaluation of clothing, materiel, vehicles and equipment needed by the PNP for effective and efficient maintenance of public order and safety as well as the aatainment of the objectives of the PNP’s Self –Reliant Devlopment Program (SRDP);

15. Drive train – a mechanical part of a vehicle, including the drive shaft and universal joint, that connects the transmission with the axles and transmits power, torque, and motion, also called driveline;

16. Eligibility Test and Evaluation – a series of test parameters and procedures conducted on particular samples of equipment/supplies submitted by different proponents/suppliers as required in determining their eligibility to supply such;

17. Endurance – the quality, act or power to withstand stress;18. Endurance Test – a test to determine the quality, act or power of

withstanding stress of the vehicle;19. Fording – to cross a river or flooded area by wading or capacity to

cross a body of water;20. Engine – machine that converts energy into mechanical power or

motion;21. Engine Displacement – that total volume displaced by the piston in

an internal combustion engine;22. Fuel Economy – the savings in percentage on the total distance

travelled per fuel consumption with or without gadget;23. Fuel Economy Test – a test to determine the total distance travelled

per fuel consumption of the vehicle;24. Grade – an inclined or upward road or surface;25. Hydrocarbons – an organic compound, like benzene or methane,

that contains carbon and hydrogen;26. Major Defect – a defect, other than critical, that is likely to result in

failure, or in reducing materially the use of a unit or product from its intended purpose;

90

27. Major Defective – a unit or product which contains one or more major defect and may also contain minor defects but no critical defect;

28. Major Parts – parts, component or assembly of the vehicle whose principal or secondary is the containment of the internal pressure such as engine transmission;

29. Maneuverability – the ease of driving a vehicle;30. Maneuverability Test – a test to determine the ease of driving the

vehicle;31. Maximum Speed – the highest speed the vehicle can attain;32. Maximum Speed Test – a test to determine the highest speed the

vehicle can attain;33. Minor Defect – a defect that is not likely to reduce materially the use

of the unit or product for its intended purpose; or is a departure from established standards but having little bearing on the effective use or operation of the unit or product;

34. Minor Defective – is a unit or product which contains one or more defects, but not major or critical defect;

35. Ordnance – military materiel such as weapons, ammunition, combat vehicles and equipment;

36. Patrol Jeep – a four –wheeled vehicle designed for patrolling and transport of light cargo or personnel;

37. Power train – the portion of a vehicle’s drive mechanism that transmits power from the engine to the wheels, tracks, or propeller; An automobile’s power train includes the cluctch, transmission, driveshaft, and differential;

38. Proponents – suppliers/dealers dul accredited to transact business with the PNP;

39. Pull/Stability Test – a test to determine if the vehicle will move foreward in a straight line without too much deviation;

40. Representatives from PNP Offices and Proponents – witnesses during the conduct of the entire tests;

41. Service Brake Test – a test to determine the braking capability of the vehicle;

42. Smoke Belching – the forceful expulsion or forcing out of smoke from factory chimney, vehicle or motorcycle exhaust manifold;

43. Smoke Emission Test – a test to determine the vehicle’s pollutant emission with respect to the environmental law;

44. Suspension System – a mechanical system of spring and shock absorbers connecting the wheels and axle to the chassis of wheeled vehicles;

45. Technical Committee – a committee compose of technical personnel from DRD –PNP selected offices, end users and representative from NAPOLCOM (observer) who have technical knowledge on vehicles and relate equipments, who will conduct the eligibility and acceptance test for patrol jeep;

91

46. Technical Team – a team of technical personnel from DRD tasked to conduct eligibility and acceptance test of the patrol jeep;

47. Technical Personnel – persons from DRD who have technical knowledge on vehicles and related items who are detailed to conduct the eligibility and acceptance test;

48. Technical – a skilled personnel with technical knowledge capable of troubleshooting and applying techniques in performing his assigned task;

49. Toe –In – acondition where the front wheel of the wheel is closer to the geometric centerline than the rear of the same wheel;

50. Toe –Out – a condition where the front of the wheel is farther from the geometric centerline than the rear of the same wheel;

51. Torque – the force generated by an internal –combustion engine to turn a vehicle’s drive shaft, a vector quantity defined as the product of the tangential force and the perpindicular distance from the line of action of the force of the axis of rotation;

52. Towing – the ability to pull another vehicle;53. Vehicle – any kind of contrivance, on wheels, tracked or runners,

used to carry people or goods from one place to another over land;54. Wheel Balancing – the uniform distribution of mass about an axis of

rotation, where the center of gravity is in the same location as the center of rotation;

55. Wiggle – to move back and forth with quick irregular motions.

1.1.6 DIRECTORATE FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (DRD) TECHNICAL COMMITTEE

A Technical Committee (TC) from DRD shall be organized and shall be composed of personnel who have technical knowledge on vehicles and related equipment/items that will conduct eligibility and acceptance tets of the vehicles.

A. DRD Technical Committee

1. DRD Technical Committee shall be composed of the following:

a. The Director for Research and Development (TDRD) or his duly designated representative –Chairman

b. Chief, Weapons Transportation and Communications Division (WTCD) – Vice –Chierman.

c. Chief, Transportation Section – Secretariatd. Transportation Section PNCO –Membere. Transportation Section Engineer – Member/Recorder

92

2. In cases where there are more than four (4) proponents who have joined the Eligibility Test, services from other Sections of Weapons, Transportation and Communications Division (WTCD) or Section from other Division can be tapped upon discretion of the Chairman, Technical Committee.

3. The Committee shall have the following functions:

a. Conduct Tests pursuant to the NAPOLCOM guidelines and regulations for the Eligibility and Acceptance Tests with guidance from the Bids and Awards Committee (BAC);

b. Submit to BAC and TDRD a proposal or recommendation pertaining to the eligibility test and evaluation prior to pre-bid conference as well as after the conduct of test;

c. Determine the operational and administrative requirements needed during the conduct of test that include ligistical and financial requirements; Adopt measures that will ensure the safety of the members of the technical teams and other persons during the conduct of the test;

d. Maintain close coordination with concerned offices/perosnnel as well as the proponents to ensure the smooth conduct of the test on schedule;

e. Arrange the venue for the entire period of Test;f. Detemine whether complaints are valid or not;g. Resolve all conflict/problems which may arise during and

after the conduct of test;h. Adjudicate on problems incurred before, during and after

the test and recommend imposition of sanction(s) against erring proponent(s)/ supplier(s).

i. Maintain records of all tests; andj. Render Daily Accomplishment Report to TDRD for his

comment and notation.

4. Duties:

a. Chairman – Shall have administrative control over the day –to day activities during the conduct of eligibility and acceptance tests. He shall exercise the following functions;

1) To preside over meeting/breifings prior to the conduct of the tests;

2) To have general supersion over the day –to –day testing activities of the Committee and Technical Team(s);

93

3) To ensure that policies, guidelines and procedures are carried out during the test;

4) To designate team leader(s), cameramen and members that will compose the technical team(s) who will conduct eligibility and acceptance tests;

5) To render progress report(s) of the eligbility test and evaluation to DRD and BAC in case of the Chairman being a designated representative;

6) To resolve problems/conflicts at his level; and7) To perform other duties as directed by TDRD and

BAC in case of the Chairman being a designated repsentative.

b. Vice –Chairman – Performs such other duties as assigned by the Chairman.

c. Secretariat – He shall be the custodian of and shall maintain the records pertaining to the conduct of eligibility and evaluatio and shall be the recorder of the committee’s final action. He shall have the following specific duties:

1) To record or oversee the proper recording of the minutes of all meetings/breifings peratianing to eligibility and evaluation;

2) To assist the Chairman in the preparation of progress report(s);

3) To keep records of the resolution and sanctions imposed to proponents arising from conflict or problems; and

4) To perform other duties as directed by the Chairman or his authorized representative.

d. Members - Shall assist, witness and help supervise the conduct of test as directed by the Chairman.

e. Recorder - Shall record all minutes and pertinent matters during the entire test.

f. Observers - Representative(s) from different PNP offices/units and the NAPOLCOM to observe and witness the day-to-day conduct of Test.

B. DRD Technical Team(s)

There shall be DRD Technical Team(s) which shall be responsible for the conduct of eligibility and acceptance tests. It will be organized after the pre-bid conference for Eligibility Test or after a Memo has been

94

received indicating therein the request for inspection and in the same manner for Acceptance Test. The number of Teams for Eligibility Test will vary depending on the completion set by the BAC. In case of Acceptance Test, regular members of the DRD Technical Committee shall compose the Team. Members of the Team may come from other DRD Divisions or Sections upon discretion of the Chairman, Teechnical Committee.

1. Compositon:

A Team shall be composed of the following:

a. Team Leader – Police Commissioned Officer (PNCO)b. Members – 1 Police Non-Commissioned Officer (PNCO)

and 1 NUP (minimum)c. Recorder

2. Duties:

a. Team Leader – direct, supervise the overall activity of the team

b. Members – assist and supervise the conduct of the test as directed by the Team Leader

c. Recorder – Record all pertinent matters during the entire test

1.1.7 POLICY GUIDELINES

A. The BAC shall cause the conduct of eligibility and acceptance tests of ordnance equipment and supplies as required in every procurement activity;

B. The BAC shall determine the number of samples/prototype unit(s) to be used during the Test;

C. The BAC shall conduct visual inspection on the sample and decide whether to accept or reject it before the functional examination by the DRD Technical Team;

D. The Transportation Section PNCO of DRD shall receive the sample vehicle from the proponent(s) and issue receipts therefor. He shall be responsible of the vehicle submitted;

E. Late submission of samples/prototype unit(s) for a schedule that was prescribed by the BAC will no longer be entertained. Replacement of sample should not be allowed after the lapse of schedule deadline for submission of sample/prototype unit(s);

95

F. The DRD shall inform the BAC immediately after the lapse of scheduled submmission of samples and the number of proponents who submitted samples;

G. The DRD shall brief and furnish all the proponents copies of the policy guidelines and parameters to be used in the test. Suggestions may be received by the DRD and may recommend its adoption by BAC after which the guidelines and procedures become binding to the proponents. Complaints may no longer be entertained after the conduct of the Test and Evaluation;

H. The DRD shall provide the Technical personnel that will oversee the conduct of the Test at the selected testing places. The Test shall be witnessed by representatives from other offices of the PNP, NAPOLCOM, proponents and other interested persons. A video footage of the conduct of test shall be taken for future reference;

I. The DRD may conduct Test and Evaluation of items even in the absence of any procurement program and directive from the PNP BAC which will be termed as Product Demonstration. The product evaluation result shall only be used as reference for any recommendation which DRD may deem appropriate;

J. The Test Parameter must be conducted one after the other (chronologically or step by step). It is prohibited to proceed to the next or succeeding parameters without finishing the former. Any problem arising from a particular Test parameter shall be immediately brought to the attention of the Head, DRD Technical Committee of the Team Leader. Failure on the part of any affected proponents to file or register complaints on a particulaar Test parameter shall be deemed agreement to the overall conduct of the Test;

K. The proponents shall provide diesel fuel, other needed equipment and materials for use in the Test and Evaluation of their submitted vehicle(s). They shall also provide the DRD a list of their drivers, mechanics and representatives during the entire conduct of test and evaluation;

L. The proonents shall execute a waiver that the DRD-PNP Technical Committee shall not be held liable for whatsoever damage/s incurred by anybody to the vehicle, which is under Test and Evaluation;

M. The Test and Evaluation may be postponed and re-scheduled by the DRD-PNP Technical Committee in the absence of the Proponent or its authorized representative for meritorious reason. A written

96

request for scheduling duly approved by The Director for Research and Development (TDRD) will determine its resumption;

N. Any complaint on the sample(s) submitted for testing shall be brought immidiately to the attention of Head, DRD Technical Committee for resolution;

O. The conduct of Test and Evaluation on paticular sample(s) shall immediately be suspended or stopped by the Hed, DRD Technical Committee pending the resolution or settlement of any problems raised during the conduct of the test;

P. The Eligibility Test and Evaluation results of sample ordnance equipment and supplies shall be valid from the date of the official final report of the DRD Technical Committee for as long as the standing Memo Circular is in effect. A report that containts the findings, sonclusion and recommendations whether the sample is conforming or not conforming based on NAPOLCOM –approved standard specifications and the approved test and evaluatio procedures used and ve submitted;

Q. Proponents whose samples have failed the Eligibility Test mat request for a retest. Said retest shall be approved byBAC and the expenses therefor shall be borne by the Proponent. Result of the retest shall be used in the next procurement activity and shall not be binding in the current procurement program;

R. Sample/prototype units(s) used in the testing will not be considered as one of the units to be delivered to the PNP in case the company wins the public bidding.

1.1.8 Test and Evaluation Procedures

1.1.8.1 Memorandum Circular No. 2005-07

POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ELIGIBILITY AND ACCEPTANCE TEST AND EVALUATION FOR PATROL JEEP

A. Phase I (Pre –Inspection Examination)

1. Purpose: Ascertain if the submitted sample vehicle(s) conform/ comply with the NAPOLCOM – approved standard specifications as to power train, drive train, dimensions, tires, vehicle’s accessories, and other vital parts/ assemblies prior to actual test and evaluation.

97

2. Visual and Dimensional Inspection: This test shall be performed to determine the overall workmanship and compliance to the standard specifications in order to ensure safety to the user.


a. Steel Tapeb. Vernier Caliperc. Brochure of the Vehicled. Diessel Fuel

4. Procedure:

a. Conduct visual and dimensional inspecion by following the evaluation sheet to determine the actual power train, drive train, dimensions, tires, vehicle’s accessories, etc vis–a–vis NAPOLCOM–approved standard specifications;

b. Examine the vehicle for proper functioning by starting the engine, engaging the drive gears (forward and reverse), applying brakes, switching –on all the lights including the AM/FM redio/cassette player and;

c. Turn –on the aircon system and gradually adjust to the coolest.

5. Standard:

a. The vehicle must comply with the NAPOLCOM –approved standard specifications; and

b. All the lights, AM/FM radio/cassette player, siren, blinker and aircon system must function properly.

B. Phase II (Test Proper)

1. Service Brake Test

a. Purpose: To determine the reducing/stopping capability of the vehicle by contract friction.

b. Equipment/Materials:1) Steel Tape2) Diesel3) Speedometer4) Tachometer5) Chalk

98

6) Masking Tape

c. Driver: Proponent’s Driver

d. Procedures:

1) At both full and non –load conditions, the vehicle will be driven on a cemented, flat road and will apply the service brake at a designated line upon reaching the required speed indicated below.

2) The test will be performed in five (5) trials taking note of the distance when the vehicle stops.

SpeedStopping Distance

Average Remark(s)1 2 3 4 5

30 kph45 kph60 kph80 kph100 kph

e. Standard: The prototype unit(s) should have stopping power and reliable brake system.

2. Accelaration Test

a. Purpose: To determine if the vehicle at both full and non –load conditions can attain the required speed at a given time.

b. Equipment/Materials.

1) Timer2) Diesel Fuel3) Speedometer4) Tachometer

c. Driver: Proponents Driver d. Procedure:

1) The vehicle will be driven in a flat cemented road.2) The vehicle will be driven as fast as could be at five (5)

different required speeds within specified time indicated below.

3) The test will be performed in five (5) trials.4) Record any observation noted on the vehicle.

99

Required Speed

Required Time

Speed/TimeAve Remark(s)

1 2 3 4 50-45 kph 15 sec0-60 kph 30 sec0-80 kph 45 sec

0-100 kph 60 sec

e. Standard: The vehicle must be able to attain the required speed at the given specified time.

3. Ascending/Gradeability Test

a. Purpose: To detemine if the vehicle’s power is sufficiently strong


1) Diesel Fuel2) Protractor

c. Driver: Proponent’s Driver d. Procedures:

1) At full and non –load conditions, the vehicle will be driven on a 30 -degree inclined road.

2) While regotiating the road, the driver will stop the vehicle in the middle of the road by means of the service brake.

3) He will then continue to drive uphill.4) The test will be performed in five (5) trials.

TrialsRemark(s)

1 2 3 4 5

e. Standard: The vehicle must be able to negotiate the inclined road in a stop and go condition.

4. Fuel Economy Test

a. Purpose: To determine if the vehicle is not gas extravagant/gas guzzler while driving within a specified distance.

b. Equipment/Taterials.

1) Calculator

100

2) Diesel Fuel3) Speedometer4) Tachometer

c. Driver: Proponent’s Driver d. Procedure:

1) A selected two (2) gasoline stations shall be designated

as the start and finish points, respectively. 2) The vehicle shall be filled to full tank with diesel fuel at the

starting point.3) The odometer shall be set to zero (0) at starting poin.4) The vehicle will travel at a speed of 60 – 80 kph up to the

finish point.5) Upon reaching the finish point, the vehicle will again be

filled to full tank taking note of the fuel consumed and the distance travelled.

6) The mileage will then be computed.

SpeedDistance Travelled

(Km)Fuel

Consumed (liters)

Mileage km/liter Remark(s)

Start Finish

e. Standard: Able to attain fuel economy of the vehicle at normal drivng condition.

5. Maximum Speed Test

a. Purpose: To determine the maximum speed the vehicle can attin within a 10 –kilometer distance.




d. Procedure:

1) At full and non –load conditions, the vehicle will be driven in a flat and normal road condition.

101

2) The vehicle should be driven fast as it could within 10-kilometer distance.

3) Record the maximum speed and take note of any observation.

e. Standard: Sample/prototype unit(s) to attain the maximum/top speed of 140 kph both for 4x2 and 4x4 as prescribed by NAPOLCOM-approved standard specificaitons.

6. Maneuverability Test

a. Purpose: To determine if the vehicle can manage to turn 360 degrees with a speed of 20 – 40 kph.


1) Steel Tape2) Diesel fuel3) Speedometer4) Chalk5) Masking Tape


d. Procedure:

1) At full and non-load conditions, the vehicle will be driven in a normal road condition at speed of 20 – 40 kph.

2) The vehicle will be maneuvered to turn 360 degrees with a minimum turning radius of 6 meters.

3) Record the turning radius and note any observation.

e. Standard: The turning radius at 360 degree must ne achieved at a minimum of 6 meters.

7. Endurance Test

a. Purpose: To determine the quality, power and endurance of the vehicle to withstand stress.

b. Equipment/Materials;

1) Diesel Fuel2) Steel Tape3) Towing Hook/Wire


102

d. Procedure:

1) Towing Test – At non –load condition, the vehicle will tow another vehicle for one (1) kilometer distance.

2) Fording Test – The vehicle will cross a river or flooded/ submerged area with a depth of 60 cm.

3) Sand Test – The vehicle will measure on a sandy beach.4) Mud TEST – The vehicle will maneuver on a muddy road

with 30 cm depth of mud.

e. Standard:

1) The vehicle must be able to tow another vehicle of similar size or weight without engine overheating or clutch sliding.

2) The vehicle must be able to cross the river or flooded/ submerged area.

3) The vehicle must be able to maneuver the sandy beach without stalling.

4) The vehicle must be able to maneuver the muddy raod without stalling.

8. Smoke Emission Test (Environmental Law Compliance)

a. Purpose: To determine the vehicle’s compliance on environmental law specially on anti –smoke belching program/campaign of the government. This test will be conducted right after the conduct of the preceeding test parameters. b. Equipment/Materials:

1) Diesel Fuel 2) Smoke Emission Testing Machine

c. Procedure:

1) Right after the preceeding test, the vehicle will undergo smoke emission test at DOT/LTO accredited smoke emission test center.

d. Standard: The vehicle must pass the smoke emission test set

by the government for environmental law compliance. 9. Pull/stability Test

a. Purpose: To determine the quality of the vehicle’s stability specifically on alignment (no pulling to the left or right) to

103

include underchassis and suspension system of the unit. Usually, no human intervention on the steering system during the conduct of the test.


1) Diesel Fuel2) Camber/Wheel Balancing/Alignment Machine

c. Procedure:

Right after the smoke emission test, the vehicle will undergo under chassis, camber slignment and wheel balancing test at any service centers for pulling/stability tests. d. Standard: The vehicle must pass the camber alignment and

wheel balancing test based on manufacturer’s technical maual or specifications.

1.1.8.2 Memorandum Circular No. 2005-03

POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ELIGIBILITY AND ACCEPTANCE TEST AND EVALUATION FOR MOTORCYCLES

A. Test Motorcycle Description (Include Photography)

1. Test Objective: Determine the motorcycle’s physical characteristics and descriptions.

2. Test Methodology: List down the motorcycle’s description.

B. Handling Test

1. Definition of Terms:

a. Handling –Simple and uncomplicated driving. This involves the judgment of a rider who may find different motorcycles easier or more difficult to drive.

b. Test Objective: Determine if the motorcycle is easier or difficult to drive.

c. Scope: This test shall be conducted on a level road.d. Test Methodology: The motorcycle must undergo the following

test:

104

d.1 Slalom Test

The motorcycle shall be driven by 4 separate drivers and shall rate the motorcycle’s performance in the scale of 1 to 10. One (1) representing poor, 5 representing average and 10 representing excellent. The average result of the score attained will be the score.

d.2 Steady Turning Test

The motorcycle shall be driven by 4 separate drivers and shall be rate the motorcycle’s performance in the scale of 1 to 10.

One (1) representing poor, 5 representing average and 10 representing excellent. The average result of the score attained will be the score.

d.3 Obstacle Avoidance Test.

The motorcycle shall be driven by 4 separate drivers and shall rate the motorcycle’s performance in the scale of 12 to 10.

105


d.4 U Turn Test

The motorcycle shall be driven by 4 separate drivers and shall rate the motorcycle’s performance in the scale of 1 to 10.


d.5 Change Lane Test

The motorcycle shall be driven by 4 separate drivers and

shall rate the motorcycle’s performance in the scale of 1 to 10.

One (1) representing poor, 5 representing average and 10 reperesenting excellent. Theaverage result of the score attained will be the score.

e. Test Duration: One (1) hour

f. Cost of Test: More or less 100,00

C. Acceleration, Top Speed, and Brake Test

106


a. Acceleration – the rate of change of velocity with respect to time,

b. Top Speed – the highest speed the motorcycle can attain,c. Brake – a device for reducing or stopping motion, on a vehicle/

motorcycle by contact friction.

2. Acceleration Test:

a. Objective: Determine if the vehicle can attain a given speed at a given time,

b. Scope: This test covers all motorcycle,

c. Test Mehtodology: Let the vehicle run at a speed tabulated below. The vehicle should be able to attain the required speed at a given time. Perform this in five (5) trials and get the average. Note all observations on the vehicle.

Required Speed

RequiredSpeed

Trial Time (Sec)1 2 3 4 5 Ave Remarks Rating

0 -45 15 Sec0 -60 30 Sec0 -80 45 Sec0 -90 60 Sec

d. Rest Duration: One (1) hour

f. Cost of Test: More or less P 100.00

3. Top Speed Test

a. Objective: Determine the actual top speed attainable by the motorcycle.

b. Scope: This test covers all motorcycles.

c. Methodology: The vehicle will be made to run as fast as it could in a normal road condiction, at 1 to 2 kilometer distance with zero starting point, record all observations and the maximum speed attained.

d. Test Duration: Two (2) hours.

107

e. Cost of Test: More or less P 200.00.

4. Brake Test

a. Objective: Determine the reducing or stopping capablity of the motorcycle thru contatc friction.

b. Scope: This Test shall be conducted on a level road.

c. Methodology: The motorcycle is to stop in the middle of the grade by means of the foot and hand brake. Perform this in three (3) trials at the following speed:

SpeedBraking Distance Remark/s

1 2 3 Average30 kph45 kph60 kph

d. Test Duration: One (1) hour.

e. Cost of Test: More or less P 100.00

D. Parts of Market Availability

1. Definition of Term:

Market availability – the availability of the motrocycle spare parts in various urban centers nationwide.

E. Endurance Test:

1. Definittion of Term:

Endurance – The quality, act or power of witrhstanding stress.

2. Test Objective: Determine the capability of the motorcyle under stress situations, terrain and condiction.

3. Scope – This test covers all motorcycles.

4. Methodology – The motrocycle must undergo the following test:

a. Towing Test – The motorcycle must be capable of towing another motorcycle.

108

b. Fording Test – Allow the motorcycle to cross a tiver or submereged/flooded area at half the height of the wheel. The motorcycle must be able to cross the depth with the engine still running during and after the immersion.

c. Ramp Test – The motorcycle shall negotiate a sharp edge concrete ramp positive or negative.

d. Long Distance Running – The motorcycle shall travel continuously for 1,000 km distance.

e. Test Duration – Forty eight (48) hours.

f. Cost of Test (To be determine by DRD in coordination with the proponents)

F. Fuel Economy Test

1. Definition of Term:

Fuel Economy – Means the savings is percentage on the total distance traveled per fuel consumption with and without gadget.

2. Test Objective: Determine if the motorcycle is not extravagant in fuel.

3. Scope: This test covers all motorcycles.

4. Methodology: The motorcycle will be made to run in a normal road condition. Measure the distance traveled and the fuel consumption. This test can be jibed in the conduct of Long Distance Travel Test.

SpeedDistance, Km

Fuel Consumed

(liters)Mileage (km/liter)

Remark/s

Start Finish

G. Environmental Law Compliance (Smoke Emission Test)

1. Scope – this test covers all vehicles.


a. Smoke Belching – the foreceful expulsion or forcing out of skone from factory chimney, vehicle or motorcycle exhaust manifold.

109

b. Carbon Dioxide – one oftwo (2) oxides of carbon and it is the principal product oxide of carbon formed from the combustion of hydrocarbon fuel.

c. Carbon Monoxide – an odorless, tasteless, invisible gas as a result of incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, such as wood, kerosene, gasoline, charcoal, natural gas, etc.

d. Hydrocarbons – any of numerous organic compunds, such as benzene and methane, that contain only carbon and hydorgen.

3. Test Objectives: Determine the vehicle’s compliance on environmental law specifically on anti –smoke belching program/campaign of the government. This test will be conducted right after the conduct of the preceding test parameters.

4. Equipments/Materials:

a. Gasoline/Dieselb. Services of smoke emission testing centers

5. Estimated Test Duration: Two (2) hours

6. Estimated Cost of Test: P 500.00

7. Methodology: The vehicles will undergo smoke emission test at any DOTC/LTO accredited lesting centers for environmental law compliance.

H. Testing Conditions:

1. Proponent shall execute waiver or quit claim that the PNP shall not be responsible for any damage on the motorcycle during the period of test.

2. Proponent shall borne all financial, administrative and operation or logistical requirements for the product evaluation.

3. Proponent shall provide accident insirance coverage to PNP personnel actually involved in the test product evaluation.

4. Proponent shall provide representative during the period of testing as observer(s)/technical personnel.

5. Proponent shall submit/provide prototype/sample unit(s) based on NAPOLCOM –approved PNP specifications for test and evaluation.

110

2.2.4.3 MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR Number________________

POLICY GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF ELIGIBILITY AND ACCEPTANCE TEST AND EVALUATION FOR PATROL JEEP (DIESEL, 4X2/4x4)

A. Phase I (Pre-Inspection Examination)

1. Purpose: Ascertain if the submitted sample vehicle(s) conform/comply with the NAPOLCOM-approved standard specifications as to power train, drive train, dimensions, tires, vehicle’s accessories, and other vital parts/assemblies prior to actual test and evaluation.

2. Visual and Dimensional Inspection: This test shall be performed to determine the overall workmanship and compliance to the standard specifications in order to ensure safety to the user.

3. Equipment/Materials;

a. Steel Tapeb. Vernier Caliperc. Brochure of the Vehicled. Diesel Fuel

4. Procedure:

a. Conduct visual and dimensional inspection by following the evaluation sheet to determine the actual power train, drive train, dimensions, tires, vehicle’s accessories, etc vis-à-vis NAPOLCOM-approved standard specifications;

b. Examine the vehicle for proper functioning by starting the engine, engaging the drive gears (forward and reverse), applying brakes, switching-on all the lights including the AM/FM radio/cassette player and;

c. Turn-on the aircon system and gradually adjust to the coolest.

5. Standard:

111

a. The vehicle must comply with the NAPOLCOM-approved standard specifications

b. All the lights, AM/FM radio/cassette player, siren, blinker and aircon system must function properly.

B. Phase II (Test Proper)

1. Service Brake Test

a. Purpose: To determine the reducing/stopping capability of the vehicle by contact friction.


1) Steel Tape2) Diesel Fuel3) Speedometer4) Tachometer5) Chalk6) Masking Tape


d. Procedures:

1) At both full and non-load conditions, the vehicle will be driven on a cemented, flat road and will apply the service brake at a designated line upon reaching the required speed indicated below.

2) The test will be performed in five (5) trials taking note of the distance when the vehicle stops.

SpeedStopping Distance

Average Remark(s)1 2 3 4 5

30 kph45 kph60 kph80 kph

100 kph

e. Standard: The prototype unit(s) should have stopping power and reliable brake system.

2. Acceleration Test

112

a. Purpose: To determine if the vehicle at both full and non-load conditions can attain the required speed at a given time.


1) Timer2) Diesel Fuel3) Speedometer4) Tachometer


d. Procedure:

1) The vehicle will be driven in a flat, cemented road.2) The vehicle will be driven as fast as could be at five (5)

different required speeds within specified time indicated below.

3) The test will be performed in five (5) trials.4) Record any observation noted on the vehicle.

RequiredSpeed

RequiredTime

Speed/TimeAverage Remark/s

1 2 3 4 50-45 kph 15 sec0-60 kph 30 sec0-80 kph 45 sec

0-100 kph 60 sec

e. Standard: The vehicle must be able to attain the required speed at the given specified time.

3. Ascending/Gradeability Test

a. Purpose: To determine if the vehicle’s power is sufficiently strong.


1) Diesel Fuel2) Protractor


d. Procedures:

113

1) At full and non-load conditions, the vehicle will be driven on a 30-degree inclined road.

2) While negotiating the road, the driver will stop the vehicle in the middle of the road by means of the service brake.

3) He will then continue to drive uphill.

4) The test will be performed in five (5) trials.

TRIALSREMARK(S)

1 2 3 4 5

e. Standard: The vehicle must be able to negotiate the inclined road in a stop and go condition.

4. Fuel Economy Test

a. Purpose: To determine if the vehicle is not gas extravagant/gas guzzler while driving within a specified distance.


1) Calculator2) Diesel Fuel3) Speedometer4) Tachometer


d. Procedure: 1) A selected two (2) gasoline stations shall be designated

as the start and finish points, respectively.

2) The vehicle shall be filled to full tank with diesel fuel at the starting point.

3) The odometer shall be set to zero (0) at starting point.

4) The vehicle will travel at a speed of 60 – 80 kph up to the finish point.

114

5) Upon reaching the finish point, the vehicle will again be filled to full tank taking note of the fuel consumed and the distance travelled.

6) The mileage will then be computed.

SpeedDistance

Travelled, KmFuel

Consumed(liters)

Mileagekm/liter

Remark(s)

Start Finish

e. Standard: Able to attain fuel economy of the vehicle at normal driving condition.

5. Maximum Speed Test

a. Purpose: To determine the maximum speed the vehicle can attain within a 10-kilometer distance.




d. Procedure:

1) At full and non-load conditions, the vehicle will be driven in a flat and normal road condition.

2) The vehicle should be driven fast as it could within 10-kilometer distance.

3) Record the maximum speed and take note of any observation.

e. Standard: Sample/prototype unit(s) to attain the maximum/top speed of 140 kph both for 4x2 and 4x4 as prescribed by NAPOLCOM-approved standard specifications.

6. Maneuverability Test

a. Purpose: To determine if the vehicle can manage to turn 360 degrees with a speed of 20 – 40 kph.

115


1) Steel Tape2) Diesel fuel3) Speedometer4) Chalk5) Masking Tape


d. Procedure:

1) At full and non-load conditions, the vehicle will be driven in a normal road condition at speed of 20 – 40 kph.

2) The vehicle will be maneuvered to turn 360 degrees with a minimum turning radius of 6 meters.

3) Record the turning radius and note any observation.

e. Standard: The turning radius at 360º must be achieved at a minimum of 6 meters.

7. Endurance Test

a. Purpose: To determine the quality, power and endurance of the vehicle to withstand stress.


1) Diesel Fuel2) Steel Tape3) Towing Hook/Wire


d. Procedure:

1) Towing Test – At non-load condition, the vehicle will tow another vehicle for one (1) kilometer distance.

2) Fording Test – The vehicle will cross a river or flooded/submerged area with a depth of 60 cm.

3) Sand Test – The vehicle will maneuver on a sandy beach.

116

4) Mud Test – The vehicle will maneuver on a muddy road with 30-cm depth of mud.

e. Standard:

1) The vehicle must be able to tow another vehicle of similar size or weight without engine overheating or clutch sliding.

2) The vehicle must be able to cross the river or flooded/submerged area.

3) The vehicle must be able to maneuver the sandy beach without stalling.

4) The vehicle must be able to maneuver the muddy road without stalling.

8. Smoke Emission Test (Environmental Law Compliance)

a. Purpose: To determine the vehicle’s compliance on environmental law specifically on anti-smoke belching program/campaign of the government. This test will be conducted right after the conduct of the preceeding test parameters.


1) Diesel Fuel2) Smoke Emission Testing Machine

c. Procedure:

Right after the preceeding test, the vehicle will undergo smoke emission test at DOTC/LTO accredited smoke emission test center.

d. Standard: The vehicle must pass the smoke emission test set by the government for environmental law compliance.

9. Pull/Stability Test

a. Purpose: To determine the quality of the vehicle’s stability specifically on alignment (no pulling to the left or right) to include underchassis and suspension system of the unit. Usually, no human intervention on the steering system during the conduct of the test.


117

1) Diesel Fuel2) Camber/Wheel Balancing/Alignment Machine

c. Procedure:

Right after the smoke emission test, the vehicle will undergo under chassis, camber alignment and wheel balancing test at any service centers for pulling/stability tests.

d. Standard: The vehicle must pass the camber alignment and wheel balancing test based on manufacturer’s technical manual or specifications.

Section 2-3 Communications Section

1.3 Communications Section

The Communications Section is also a section in the Weapons, Transportation and Communications Division of the DRD who also plays a vital role in the PNP’s procurement process of communications equipment. Currently, this Section simultaneously conducts test and evaluation of mobile radios, multi-trunked radio system, global positioning system and other communications equipment and devices used in the effective law enforcement activities like patrolling, intelligence gathering and investigations as well as attain the PNP’s goal of modernizing its commincate capabilities.

2.3.1 Test and Evaluation Procedures

2.3.1.1 Memorandum Circular Number DRD -2004 -01Test and Evaluation (T&E) Procedure for Multi-Trunked Radio System (MTRS) and Other Similar EquipmentI. OBJECTIVE: To ensure compliance to UESB/NAPOLCOM –Approved specifications of the MTRS and other similar equipment (including its

118

accessories) subject for procurement, evaluation, and or acceptance by the Philippine National Police (PNP).ORGANIZATION:

The technical evaluation will be conducted by a committee headed by the Chief, Communications Section of the Weapons, Transportations and Communications Division, Directorate for Research and Development (WTCD –DRD). The members will come from other Directorates, the user, and other selected units of the PNP provided for in the existing rules and regulations governing the conduct of T&E for PNP- Equipment. Supplier’s/Proponent’s representatives shall witness all test procedures or parameters ansd is/are authorized to operate the subjected equipment.

II. SAMPLING PLAN:

Samples tp be tested will be picked-up at random from the delivered products/manufacturing line’s lot number. At least ten percent (10%) of the total delivery of each item is needed.

III. TEST PARAMETERS:

The following test parameters are designed to determine whether the equipment/products have complied the requirement and satisfied the needs of the oVIrganization:

A. General Examination and Sampling (Physical Configuration and Accounting of the delivered Equipment);

B. Programming and Instrumentation Test (Programming of the equipment and Technical charactreristics verification by use of thest instruments);

C. Optional Adverse Condition Test;

D. Operating Range Test (Range Capability); and

E. System’s Commissioning and Acceptance.

IV. SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITY

A. PHASE I:

Location: Supplier’s/Manufacturer’s compound or the designated delivery area/place stated in the P.O./Contract wherin the required equipment for programming and Test Instruments and other needed accessories are available. Inclosure 1 matrix will be used on the results of General Examination and Sampling

119

Accounting of all delivered and or installed equipment and its accessories as provided for in the approved P.O/Contract through the Delivery Receipt (DR) from the supplier.

1. General Examination:

a. Accounting of all delivered and or installed equipment and its accessories as provided for in the approved P.O./Contract through the Delivery Receipt (DR) from the supplier;

b. Checking/Verification on the configuration of all delivered equipment/installed system’s project;

c. Checking/verification on the commonality of accessories including microphone, antenna, battery pack, and others;

d. Funtional and Physical interchangeability of the sub-assembly/cases;

e. Weight (Optional); andf. Dimension (Optional).

2. Random Sampling: Ten percent (10%) from each delivered major items

B. PHASE II:

Location: Same as Phase I. All tranceiver shall be pre-factory programming.

1. Programming and Instrumentation Test. Inclosures 2A matrix will be used for the result of the Instrumentation Tests.

a. Repeater/s (Trunked/Conversational)

a.1 RF power outputa.2 Transmit Frequency Measurementa.3 Transmit Max Deviation Measurementa.4 Transmit Frequency Stabilitya.5 Receiver Sensitivity

b. Handheld (Analog/Digital)

b.1 RF power outputb.2 Transmit Frequency Measurementb.3 Transmit Max Deviation Measurementb.4 Transmit Frequency Stabilityb.5 Receiver Sensitivity

120

c. Mobile and Base (Trunked/Conventional)

c.1 RF power outputc.2 Transmit Frequency Measurementc.3 Transmit Max Deviation Measurementc.4 Transmit Frequency Stabilityc.5 Receiver Sensitivity

2. System’s Trunked Contoller and Monitoring Equipment Tests.

Sub-components of the system should be tested in accordance with the supplier’s/manufacturer’s test procedure to check their respective operations and features using Inclosure 2B matrix for the following:

a. Central Controllerb. LED Indicatorc. Frail softd. Control Channele. Voice Channel Accessf. Configuration Manager Screeng. Selective Radio Inhibith. Dynamic Regroupingi. SMT Accessj. Snapshoot

3. Adverse Condition Test.

Only indicated test procedures in the equipment shall be performed.

Following test parameters are optional unless the equipment to be tested claimed compliance to any of the following Military Standards. Inclosure 2C matrix will be used to record the results of the Adverse Condition Test.

a. Dust Test- by placing dust in all surfaces of the equipment, the user will be assured that the terminal are ready on any dust environments for a longer use.

b. Vibration Test- at the rate from 35 to 350 Hz per-minute, for the uration of 30 minutes, user can be assured on the durability of the equipment.

c. Wet Operation Test- with set completely wet by using a water sprayer the equipment is said to be wet protected after passing the test for RF power output receiver sensitivity, and frequency accuracy.

121

d. Water Proofing Test- one (1) meter immersion for ten (10) minutes is an assurance that the equipment is waterproof after passing the usual instrumentation test.

e. Drop Test- to ensure that the equipment is rugged designed, the set must pass this kind of test.

f. Operational Capabillity in High Temperature test- Operation While the set has been placed from a High Temperature over (fifty degrees Celsius) thereafter, the RF power output, receiver sensitivity and frequency accuracy must be conducted to check if the set has been affected by the heat applied.

g. Antenna Durability Test (Optional)- Flexible antenna must not be broken after being bent from the midpoint up to so many times.

h. Casing/Knobs Durability Test (Optional)- the case must not be deformed when the weight of heavy but soft materials are placed on top of its widest face. The subjected equipment should withstand rough handlings.

C. PHASE III:

Location: Any designated stationary point of reference such as: Repeater Station; Base Station; and/or System-Infrastructure shall be considered in testing the efficiency of the moving/mobile stations on certain designated distance. Audio signal received must be readable. Inclosure 3 matrix will be used to record the results of the Operating Range Test.

Operating Range Test of different tranceiver terminals:

1. Handheld (Conventional Operation Test)

There must be a pre-determined range between the two (2) contract points from one (1) kilometer to five (5) kilometers without any barrier, depending on the power output and type of antenna used. Ideally, one (1) watt can effectively cover one (1) km, or two (2) watts for 2km, and etc. without barrier.

2. Handheld (Repeater/Trunking Operations Test)

The determined distances will be based from the repeater location or trunking repeater’s site with increasing distancesw mentioned-above. The area coverage from the repeater station must increase from a distance of one (1) kilometer to a minimum of fifty (50) kilometers without any barrier.

3. Mobile and Base Terminals (Conventional and Trunked Repeater Operations)

122

The determined distances will be based from a mobile tranceiver station or a base/repeater station to other stationary station.

An increasing distance of ten (10), up to fifty (50) kilometer, without any barrier must result into a voice signal.

A mobile, base, and repeater teminals should have clear voice contract with a minimum distance of fifty (50) kilometers without any barrier.

4. Repeater (Conventional and Trunked Operations)

With the use of any available operational tranceiver such as handheld, mobile and base, the repeater through its receiver must e triggered to activate the transmittter side. From the input signal, the repeater must transmit the required RF power output with clear audio signal reception from the other end at the minimum distance of fifty (50) kilometers without any barrier and depending upon the weather condition.

VII. FIELD TEST PLAN

A. General examination:

Conduct of accounting, ocular and technical Inspection of the equipment/system such as repeaters, combiner, radio tranceiver (handheld, mobile, base), power supply, and alike to include accessories has to be done in order to determine compliance by the supplier in accordance with the approved P.O./Contract:

1. Validation on the content of the delivery/project;2. Ocular inspection on the configuration of the system/equipment

and accessories;3. Weight (optional);4. Dimension (optional);5. Commonality of the handset with the other universal tactical

radios;6. Provision for data communication mode;7. Antenna base position flexibility;8. Accessebility of controls/ease of operation;9. Functional and physical interchangeability of modules, sub-

assemblies, cabinets or casing; and10. Other features.

B. Instrumentation test:

123

1. RF Power Output:

1.1 Set the regulated power supply to the operating voltage of the equipment

1.2 Set the radio on trnsmit operation.

1.3 Note the reading on the RF wattmeter.

1.4 Repeat the procedures for all programmed channels (from the lowest to the highest).

1.5 Measure current drain

2. Receiver Sensitivity:

2.1 Set the volume and gain control for the maximum output.

2.2 Note down the noise level indicated in the radio power meter with the FM Signal Generator disconnected from the antenna socket.

2.3 Reconnect the FM Signal Generator to the receiver antenna. Set the generator to approximately one hundred kilohertz (100 kHz) of the operating frequency of the receiver to obtain a beat noise.

2.4 Adjust the generator signal strenght to obtain a reading in the audio Power meter which is ten (10) times that of the noise level previously taken.

3. Frequency Stability Test (Optional)

This test performs frequency reading for determining stability of the Program Center operating frequency of the equipment after undergoing the adverse test.

4. Instrument/ Equipment to be used:

4.1. RF Power meter with reflect signal reading covering VHF to HF bands

4.2. Frequency Counter, VHF to UHF Bands4.3. Signal Geneator, RF and AF Signal capable of emitting,

0,1 microvolt to 0.50 volt, across all frequency range.4.4. Power Supply (230VAC/12.3 VDC), at least 3 Amp.

124

4.5. Dummy loads wiith range acrosss encountered transmitter power output - RF carrier deviation meter/RF modulation meter.

4.6. VTVM or Digital Multi-meter.

C. Optional Adverse Condition Test:

Determine the reliability of the communication set under adverse conditions such as: Dust test, Vibration test, Water Proofing test, Operating whilw the set is wet, Drop test, operating while the set has been placed in temperature, Antenna durability test, and Casing/knobs durabillity test. Sets will be indpected after each test for any physical damage followed by instrumentation or functional test.

1. Dust Test- Saw dust or its equivalent should be placed in all surfaces of the equipment after which, the subject equipment will be placed one (1) meter away from a blowing air fan on its lowest speed for a span of one (1) minute. Power output, receiver sensitivity, and frequency accuracy test will be measured to determine if the equipment was affected by the dust.

2. Vibration Test – The transceiver will be accurately and securely placed in a vibrating flat form, which will be made to vibrate at the rate of approximately 35 to 350 kHz per minute for the duration of 30 minutes. Power output, receiver sensitivity, and frequency accuracy test will be measured to determine if the equipment was affected by the vibration.

3. Wet Operation Test – The transceiver will be et by the use of a water sprayer at a distance of one (1) foot, enough to spray all surfaces with water, After which, the RF power output, receiver sensitivity, and frequency accuracy shall be measured.

4. Water Proofing Test – The subjected equipment will be immersed with the attached accessories (antenna, battery, and etc.) in a fresh water for a period of ten (10) minutes with the depth of atleast one (1) meter. A used steel or plastic up-gas drum may be used to contain the body of the water.

5. After the immersion, the unit with dry cloth for atleast five (5) minutes to remove the water outside its ssurfaces. After which the equipment will be subjected to test its RF power output, sensitivity of the receiver, and frequency accuracy.

6. Drop Test – The set shall be dropped from a height of one half ( ½) meters to a one fourth (1/4) inches thick plywood, resting

125

on a concrete surface. This will be performed in all its six (6) surfaces/angles. After which, the set will be subjected for RF power output, receiver sensitivity, and frequency accuracy.

7. Operational Capability in high Temperature Test – Operating while the set has been placed from a high Temperature over (fifty degrees celcius) thereafter, the RF power output, receiver sensitivity and frequency accuracy must be conducted to check if the set has been affected by the heat applied.

8. Antenna Durability Test – This is applicable to handhelds rubber-ducky/flexible antenna only. It should not be broken after being bent at 180 degrees on the mid point up to fifty (50) times.

9. Casing/Knobs Durability Test – A sack of rice or its equivalent soft materials with a weight of not more than 50 kg should be placed on the top of the equipment widest face. The case must not be deform. Knob and switches should withstand the rough handling. The usual test should be performed.

D. Operational Range/Compatibility Test: To determine the operating range of every terminal and their compatibility. Two (2) stations will be established. One stationary and the other moving to designated contact points of pre determined increasing distances. Upon reaching a contact point, the moving station will establish radio contact with the fixed station. This procedure shall be repeated at all contact points until communication cannot be made.

E. System’s Commissioning/Acceptance: After all test have been performed, the commissioning/acceptance of the system will follow, which means that the system is completely installed operational by the supplier. System’s Acceptance Commissioning Certification (Inclosure 4) will be used as accomplished form.

2.3.1.2 MEMORANDUM dated December 6, 2006

Policy Guidelines in the Conduct of Eligibility/Post Bid Evaluation and Acceptance for Tests Global Positioning System (GPS)

I. Purpose:

The purpose of this memorandum is o provide policy guidelines, procedures and standards in the conduct of Eligibility/Post Bid Evaluation and Acceptance Tests for Global Positioning System (GPS)

126

while waiting for the Memorandum Circular re same subject which will be signed by the CPNP.

II. DRD Technical Working Group:

The technical evaluation will be conducted by the DRD Technical Working Group (TWG) headed by the C, WTCD, DRD or a representative designated by the Director, DRD. The members of the said TWG will be the personnel of the Communication Section, WTCD, DRD, the end user (SAF), and CES representatives of the NAPOLCOM, other Directorates and other selected units of the PNP as provided for in the existing rules and regulations governing the conduct of T&E for PNP Equipment. Supplier’s representatives shall witness all test procedures and parameters and are authorized to operate the subject equipment or item

III. Policy Guidelines:

The policy guidelines, procedures and standards in the conduct of Eligibility/Post Bid Evaluation and Acceptance Tests for Global Positioning System (GPS) will be as follows:

A. The Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) shall cause the conduct of Eligibility/Post Bid Evaluation and Acceptance Tests of the item as required in every procurement activity;

B. The proponent(s) will submit to the DRD one (1) unit of Global Positioning system (GPS) for Eligibility/Post Bid Test and Evaluation regardless of the quantity to be procured;

C. The DRD shall receive and issue receipt for the samples from the proponents and shall deposit same to the supply custodian of the concerned section;

D. The DRD TWG shall conduct visual inspectin on the sample unit and decide whether to accept or reject before the fucntional examination. If upon visual examination and evaluation, the submitted item is found non-conforming with the standard specifications, no further testing shall be conducted. Instead, the TWG shall notify the propoponent through a letter the result of the test conducted. If Non-Conforming, Test and Evaluation Report will be forwarded to BAC with the receipt of the sample and its corresponding memorandum;

E. No partial Test and Evaluation Report shall issued by DRD;

127

F. Late submission of sample/s will not be accepted after the deadline prescribed by BAC. Replacement of sample will not be allowed;

G. The DRD shall inform immediately the BAC on the termination of submission of samples and the number of proponents who submitted/participated-in;

H. The DRD TWG shall brief and furnish all the proponents copies of the policy guidelines and parameters to be used in the test;

I. The Head of the DRD TWG will oversee the conduct of the Test at the selected testing places. The Test shall be witnessed by representatives from other concerned offices/units of the PNP, NAPOLCOM, proponents and other interested persons. A video coverage/pictorial on the conduct of test shall be taken;

J. The DRD may conduct Test and Evaluation of the item which will be termed as Product Evaluation even in the absence of any procurement program and directive from the PNP BAC. The product evaluation result shall only be used as reference for any recommendation which DRD may deem appropriate;

K. Test parameters must be conducted one after the other (Chronologically or step by step). Any problem arising from a particular Test Parametre shall be immediately brought to the attention of the Head, DRD TWG or the Team Leader. Failure on the part of any affected proponents to file or register complaints during the conduct of Test based on a particular test parameter shall be deemed agreement to the overall conduct of the test;

L. All neede equipment and other incidental expenses for use in the Test and Evaluation shall be borne by the requesting proponents;

M. The proponent(s) shall execute a waiver that the DRD TWG shall not be held liable for whatsoever damage/s incurred by anybody to the Global Positioning System (GPS) being used during the conduct of Test and Evaluation;

N. The Test and Evaluation may be postponed and re-scheduled by the DRD TWG in the absence of the Proponent or its authorized representative for meritorious reson. A

128

written request for rescheduling duky approved by The Director for Research and Development (TDRD) will determine its resumption;

O. The Eligibility/Post Bid Test and Evaluation results of the item shall be valid for a period of one (1) year to be reckoned from the date of the official final report of the DRD TWG for as long as the standing Memo Circular in in effect. A report that contains the findings, conclusion and recommendations whether the sample is conforming or not conforming based on NAPOLCOM-Approved Standard Specifications and the approved test and evaluation procedures used will be submitted to BAC thru TDRD;

P. Proponents whose samples have failed the Eligibility Test may request for a retest. Said retest shall be approved by BAC. Result of the retest shall be used in the next procurement activity and shall not be binding in the current procurement program; and

Q. Sample/prototype unit(s) used in the testing will not be a part of the delivery to the PNP in case the company wins the bidding.

IV. Procedures

In accordance with UESB Resolution No. 2006-024 entitled “Addendum to NAPOLCOM Resolution No. 2004-140 entitled “E-MAP Global Positioning System (GPS)”, “the Test Parameters for Global Positioning System (GPS) are as follows;

A. Phase I – Physical Configuration Test

PNP SPECIFICATIONS(UESB Resolution No. 2006-024)

TEST RESUL

T

FINDING

REMARKS

1. DimensionsWidth : 2.4” m inHeight: 5.5” minDepth : 0.8” min

2. Weight:7.2 oz max w/ or w/o batteries

3. Display:1.5” W x 2.2” H, high-contrast, 4-level gray LCD with electro luminescence backlighting

129

4. AntennaBuilt-in quad helix, with remote antenna capability

5. Keypad:Nine multifunction backlit keys

B. PHASE II – Functional Test:

PNP SPECIFICATIONS(UESB Resolution No. 2006-024)

TEST RESUL

T

FINDING

REMARKS

1. Receiver: WAAS enable, 12 parallel channel GPS receiver continuously tracks and uses up to 12 satellites to compute and update your position.

2. Acquisition Time:Warm: Approx. 15 secondsCold: Approx. 45 secondsAutolocate: Approx. 5 minutes

3. Update Rate:One (1) second continuous or better

4. GPS Accuracy:Position: 15 meters (49 feet) 95% typicalVelocity: 0.05 meter/sec or 0.1 knot RMS, steady state

5. Dynamics: 6 g’s6. Interfaces:

USB, RS@#@ w/ NMEA 0183, RTCM 104 DGPS data format and proprietary

7. Data Storage Life: Indefinite, no memory battery

required8. Map Storage:

Internal, 24 MB Minimum9. Power Source:

2AA or 12V adapter cable, or up to 36 VDC external powerBattery Life: Up to 24 hours (typical use)

10. With downloaded Metro Manila Street Map up to Barangay level

11. Waterproof Test: Immersed to water for three (3)

130

times.

CHAPTER 3

Clothing and Criminalistics Equipment Division (CCED)

3.1 Introduction

The Clothing and Criminalistics Equipment Division (CCED) mainly reviews and improves research and development and test and evaluation procedures and capabilities regarding clothing and criminalistics equipment requirements of the PNP. Its additional functions include the research and study of the latest technology in scientific investigation and relevant equipment and facilities as well as the supervision and monitoring of test and evaluation on clothing and equipment procured by the Command.

The division is currently focused on testing and evaluation of clothing and equipment, development of specifications and on the strict implementation of the re newly issued PNP LOI 2005 “TAMANG BIHIS” Campaign to curb the illegal manufacture, distribution, sale and use of PNP uniforms, insignias and other accoutrements, including materials for their production.

These materials proliferate mainly because they are made available by some suppliers and dealers in the open market. The situation is aggravated by the patronage of some PNP personnel and unscrupulous and lawless individuals who use the same for their illegal business interests.

The “TAMANG BIHIS” Campaign addresses the need to unify all efforts to ensure that textiles and accoutrements of prescribed PNP uniforms are procured only from authorized sources and sold only at the PNP Service Store System and its outlets including PNP cooperatives and other accredited dealers and suppliers.

131

Clustered action plans have been formulated for the effective and sustained implementation of the LOI. First is the dissemination of information to manufacturers, dealers and suppliers as well as to PNP personnel regarding the need for an aggressive campaign. Second is the intelligence and investigative efforts on the modus operandi of these illegal entities including case build –up against them. Third is law enforcement thru active police operations, filing of the necessary charges and imposition of immediate administrative sanctions. Fourth is the establishment and full functioning of PNP Cooperatives and the issuance of a Presidential Executive Order declaring PNP Cooperatives as distributors of prescribed PNP uniforms, insignias and all other accoutrements, including the materials for their production. The success of this campaign depends on the cooperation and commitment of all parties concerned. The greater responsibility, however, lies in its end user, the policeman, whose conscientious effort to curb these unlawful acts by the Command, results to a better image for the PNP.

Function of CCED

Review and improve research and development and test and evaluation procedures and capabilities regarding CCED requirements of the PNP.

Research and study the latest technology in scientific investigation including relevant equipment and facilities;

Supervise and monitor the conduct of test and evaluation on Clothing

Criminalistic Equipment items procured by the PNP as to their feasibility and acceptability; and

Perform other duties as directed by higher authorities.

3.2 Test and Evaluation procedures

3.2.1 MEMORANDUM CIRCULARNumber DRD 2007-01

Policy Guidelines in the Conduct of Eligibility/Post QualificationEvaluation and Acceptance Tests

I. PURPOSE :

To provide policy guidelines, procedures and standards in the conduct of Eligibility/Post Bid Evaluation and Acceptance Tests for equipments falling under the Clothing and Criminalistic Equipment Division of DRD.

132

II. ORGANIZATION :

The technical evaluation will be conducted by a Technical Team headed by the Chief, Clothing and Criminalistic Equipment Division, Directorate for Research and Development or a representative designated by the Director, DRD. The members will come from other Directorates, the end user, NAPOLCOM and other selected units of the PNP as provided for in the existing rules and regulations governing the conduct of T & E for PNP equipment.

III. POLICY GUIDELINES:

The Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) shall cause the conduct of Eligibility/Post Bid Evaluation and Acceptance Tests of the item as required in every procurement activity;

The DRD will determine the quantity of samples to be submitted for Test

and Evaluation;

The DRD shall receive and issue receipts for the samples from proponents and shall deposit the same to the supply custodian of the concerned section;

The Technical Team shall conduct visual inspection on the sample unit(s)

and decide whether to accept or reject the same before the conduct of functional examination. If upon visual examination and evaluation, the submitted item is found non-conforming with the standard specifications, no further testing shall be conducted. Test and Evaluation Report will be forwarded to the BAC with its corresponding memorandum;

NO Suppliers TrademarkTM shall mean non-acceptance of the sample(s);

Samples will be forwarded to any Qualified Testing Institution thru a letter request for destructive testing with the presence of the proponent(s) and other concerned units;

No partial Test and Evaluation Report shall be issued by DRD;

The DRD Technical Team(s) will oversee the conduct of the Test at the selected testing places. The Test shall be witnessed by representatives from other concerned offices/units of the PNP and proponent/s. A video coverage/ photograph on the conduct of test will be taken;

The DRD may conduct Test and Evaluation of the item which will be termed as Product Evaluation even in the absence of any procurement program

133

and directive from the PNP BAC. The product evaluation result shall only be used as reference for any recommendation which DRD may deem appropriate.

The DRD Technical Team shall brief and furnish all the proponents copies of the policy guidelines and parameters to be used in the test;

The Test Parameters must be conducted one after the other (chronologically or as the case may require). Any problem arising from a particular Test Parameter shall be made in writing addressed to Chairman, BAC (attn: Secretariat). Failure on the part of any affected proponents to file or register complaints within three (3) days after the conduct of Test and Evaluation shall be deemed agreement to the overall conduct of the test;

All testing fees, needed equipment and other incidental expenses for use in the Test and Evaluation shall be borne by the requesting proponents;

The proponent shall provide expert technician who will operate the submitted item and answer all questions regarding it.

The proponents shall execute a waiver that the DRD Technical Team shall not be held liable for whatever damage/s will be incurred by anybody to the item being used during the conduct of Test and Evaluation;

The Test and Evaluation may be postponed and re-scheduled by the DRD Technical Team in the absence of the Proponent or its authorized representative. A written request for rescheduling duly approved by The Director for Research and Development (TDRD) will determine its resumption;

The Eligibility/Post Qualification/ Acceptance Test and Evaluation results of the item shall be valid only for a particular procurement period. A report that contains the findings, conclusion and recommendations whether the sample is conforming or not conforming based on NAPOLCOM-Approved Standard Specifications and the approved test and evaluation procedures used will be submitted to BAC thru TDRD;

Proponents whose samples have failed the Eligibility/Post Qualification/ Acceptance Test and Evaluation may request for a reconsideration addressed to Chairman, BAC. Result of the retest shall be used in the next procurement activity and shall not be binding in the current procurement program;

Sample/s submitted for testing will be retained for a period of one (1) year;

Unclaimed items after three (3) months from the retaining period shall be forfeited; and

Sample/prototype unit(s) used in the testing will not be a part of the delivery to the PNP in case the company wins the bidding.

134

IV. ACCEPTANCE TEST AND EVALUATION:

A. Comparative Test Analysis:

Random sampling will be done where the delivered items are stored. The sample size for Acceptance Test from the delivered items will be based using the Military Standard 105-E tabulated below.

1. Failure of the delivered items/equipment to pass the Comparative Analysis will mean outright rejection of the whole delivery.

2. The results of the above-cited test criteria will be based on the 6.5% major and 25% minor of the Acceptance Quality Level (AQL) of Mil Std 105-E, Special Inspection Level S-2/General Inspection Level I (see Table 3)

Procedure: Pick samples based on the numbers tabulated above

at random from the boxes of the delivered items.

B. Destructive Test and Evaluation:

The sample must pass the Phase I and Phase II test parameters following Military Standard 105-E, Normal Inspection with Acceptance Quality Level (AQL) of 6.5 and 25 for major and minor defects, respectively. (see Table 4)

3.2.2 Sample Test Parameters based on Specifications

3.2.2.1 For Clothing/Fabric Material

I. PURPOSE OF DRD TEST AND EVALUATION : To determine whether the fabric samples submitted for Product Test and Evaluation conform with the Specifications for PNP GOA Uniform in accordance with NAPOLCOM Resolution No. 96-116

II. TEST AND EVALUATION METHOD: Comparative, visual and actual test and evaluation on the submitted samples.

PNP SPECIFICATIONS FOR SHIRT (Upper Garment)

PTRI TEST REPORT

DRDFINDINGS

*1. COLOR : Gray Blue

135

*2. FABRIC COMPOSITION: 100% Polyester (Class A)3. TYPE OF WEAVE : Plain weave 4. Fabric Construction: (+/- 5%) a. Thread Count: Ends / in = 60 (57 – 63) Picks / in = 50 (47.5 – 52.5)

b. Yarn Number: Warp = 330*5. BREAKING STRENGTH: (Grab Method) (+/- 5%) Warp = 100 Kg (980.6 N) Filling = 123 Kg (1,206.53 N)*6. DIMENSIONAL CHANGE: (Not more than 3%) Length = - 3% Width = +3%7. COLORFAST TO WASHING: * Change in Colors : All Colors = 4 - 5 Staining: ( F1 – F6 ) = 4 to 5

*8. DIST BET. WHITE PIN STRIPES : 8.0 mm

F I N A L R E S U L T

LEGEND : * - Major Parameters

Note:

The report shall be valid only on the fabric samples submitted for purposes indicated in the Letter Request. Any erasures/alteration and without DRD seal will nullify such report.

3.2.2.2 For Shoe Material

I. PURPOSE OF DRD TEST AND EVALUATION : To determine whether the sample submitted conform with the PNP Specifications of Dress Shoes, Low-Cut, Clarino (regular) as provided in NAPOLCOM Resolution No. 99-016

II. TEST AND EVALUATION METHOD: Comparative, visual and actual test and evaluation.

136

PNP Specifications for Shoes (Low Cut, Clarino)

RDC (ASCOM,PA)

FINDINGS

DEFECTS NOTED REMARKS

MAJOR MINOR1. Upper Leather :

Shall be synthetic leather (Clarino)

Color : BlackThickness : 1.5 mm - 1.7 mm

Weight : 570 g/m2 (min)

Tearing Strength : 5 kg (min) Breaking Strength : (20mmx100mm strp.)

Direction A : 14 kg (min.) Direction B : 20 kg (min.) 2. Quarter and Tongue Lining:

The quarter linings shall be cut either pig-skin or calf-skin leather.Thickness (mm) : 1.0 - 1.3

3. Vamp Lining: The quarter linings shall be cut either pig-skin or calf-skin leather.

Thickness (mm) : 1.0 - 1.3

4. Outsole : Shall be full length leather

Color : Shall be blackThickness : 4.2 mm – 4.8 mm

5. Middle Sole: Shall be full length leather

Thickness : 2.6 mm – 3.2 mm6. Outsole as Middle Sole :

Can be combined into one outsole by using hard rubber

Hardness : 70 Duro (+/- 5)Flexing : No sign of cut after

50,000 cycles

Bond Strength : 30 kgs (min.)Volume Swelling : 21.86%

7. Insole: Shall be cut from vegetable tanned full grain leather Elastomeric Fiberboard material is also acceptable conforming with the following specifications:

Thickness (mm) : 1.8 - 2.2 Weight (kg/m2) : 1.48 -1.74 Density (g/ml) : 0.6 - 0.7

Water Absorp.@ 24 hrs (%):

137

55 - 65

8. Reverse Welt : Shall be made of rubber material

Width : 1.0 cm – 2.0 cm

9. Counter :

a. Leather Counter : Shall be vegetable tanned cowhides leather 2.6 to 2.9 mm thickness after fitting. Buffed on the grain side.

b. Fiberboard Counters : The fiberboard counter shall be full molded by a molding equipment. Thickness (mm) : 1.5 - 1.8Weight : 1,300 g/m2

10. Tongue : Shall be made of the same material as the upper leather.

11. Heel : The heel should be made of Rubber blackHeel Nails : The heel nails shall be Steel or wire type

No. of pcs : 8 - 11

Length : 2.2 cm

Diameter : 1.9 mm

12. Eyeletstay : Shall be made of the same material as the quarter

Width : 2.9 cm (min.)

13. Thread :

a. Upper Fitting Thread : The thread of all upper fitting operations shall be nylon or polyester.

Breaking Strength : 2 kg (min.)

b. Running Thread : The running thread for stitching the welt and the sole shall be nylon orpolyester

No. of Ply : 5 ply

138

Breaking Strength : 3 kg (min.) c. Inseam :

Thread for stitching the welt and the sole shall be Nylon

No. of Ply : 10 ply

Breaking Strength : 10 kg (min.)

d. Double Thread : The thread for double stitching of the upper shall be Nylon

No. of Ply : 2 ply

Yarn Size : 500 DenierBreaking Strength : 2 kg (min.)

14. Box Toes : Shall be cut from a material of a woven base flannel or processed fabric impregnated with pyroxylin or polystyrene compound.

Thickness : 1.10 mm to 1.5 mm

15. Plyrib : The plyrib shall be made from elastomeric fiberboard.

Width : 6.0 mm (min.)Thickness : 2.0 mm (min.)

16. Steel Shank: Shall be heavy steel

Shall be three (3) ribbedShall be properly placed in the planter arch surface of the inner sole.

Shall be with two (2) prongs or riveted.

Gauge : No. 16

Length : 10.0 cm

Width : 2.5 cm

17. Bottom Filler : The bottom filler shall be rubberized foam coated with adhesive and firmly pressed into the insole to even out the bottom surface of the shoe.

18. Eyelet: Shall be blind, plain typeShall be aluminum

Diameter : 2.0 mm

139

Thickness : 0.5 mm after fabrication and shall be anodized.

No. of Pairs : 5 pairs19. Laces :

The laces shall be braided nylon

Shall have plastic tips

Length : 70 cm (min.)

Diameter : 2.0 mm

Breaking Strength : 50.0 kg

20. Sock Lining : Cut from split leather

Thickness : 1.0 mm

21. Reinforcing Tapes : Shall be non-adhesive cotton tape

Width : 1.6 cm (min.)

Thickness : 0.25 mm (max.)

T O T A L D E F E C T S

CRITERIA :

1. No major defect must be noted2. Ten percent (10%) allowable minor defect3. Result are valid only on sample submitted.4. Deviation may be “Acceptable” if and only if, it is considered an equivalent

material, an improved material or it will not affect the serviceability of the item.5. Erasures/alteration and without DRD seal will render the Report invalid.6. Any justifications made by the PA, RDC (Testing Center for Shoes), shall be

binding and executory prior for DRD Evaluation.

3.2.3 Other Test Parameters Conducted in CCED

Most of the test procedures done at the Clothing and Criminalistic Equipment Division (CCED) follow the procedures stated Memorandum Circular No. 2004-05 entitled “Policy in the Conduct of Eligibility and Acceptance Tests for Ordnance Equipment and Supplies” which delved mainly on the functional testing criteria.

Parameters are based on what have written on the specifications which could vary depending on types or kind of equipment/devices. Normally, their sampling method and acceptance test criteria follows the 10% rule which is 10% of the delivered items will be randomly selected for testing and the allowable minor defect must not exceed 10%.

140

REFERENCES:

CZ P-01 Gets NATO A pproval, CZ U.S.A., Internet Source.

H.P. White Laboratory, Inc - Small Arms Safety Examination and Procedures, June 1988 issue, U.S.A.

Letter to Mitsubishi Motor Philippines Corporation dated May 20, 2004 re Plant Visit.

Letter to Toyota Motor Philippines Corporation dated May 20, 2004 re Plant Visit.

Letter to Automobile Association Philippines (formerly Philippine Motor Association) dated June 2, 2004.

Memo from D, CES and TADL dated July 21, & 22, 2004, respectively.

Memo from DC –Management and LSS dated July 12 & 14 2004, respectively.

Memo from TADRD dated July 7, 2004. Memorandum for TDCS/Chairman UESB thru channel from TDRD re Addendum to NAPOLCOM Resolution No. 2004-140 entitled “E-MAP Glonal Positioning System (GPS)” dated November 30,2006.

Memoranda from TDRD re Test and Evaluation dated November 2, 2004 and January 2, 2005 respectively

Memo from TDRD, The Procurement System in the PNP dated October 13,2004;Public Bidding re procurement of Global Positioning System (GPS) and other items held at PNP Ante Room on December 18,2006, 10:00 A.M.

Memo to TMG and LSS dated April 20, 2004 re Proposed Vehicle and Motorcycle Parameters Formulation.

Military Standard: Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection and Attributes, May 10, 1989 Revised, U.S.A.

141

NAPOLCOM Resolution No. 95 -069 –Approving the Standard Specifications for PNP Anti –Terrorist Equipment dated August 17, 1995.

NAPOLCOM Resolution No. 2002 -120 –Approving the Standard Specifications for Multi –Trunked Radio System (MTRS) dated December 27, 2002.

National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Standard-0112.03 for Auto-loading Pistols for Police Officers, July 1999 issue, U.S.A.

NHQ PNP Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) Resolutin No. 06-20 entitled “Creation of Technical Working Groups that will Perform Test and Evaluation of Equipment Submitted by Suppliers in Connection with Procurement Through Public Bidding”.

NTC Memo Circular No. 2 -05 -88, Subject: Rules and Regulations Governing the Manufacture, Acquisition, Sale and Service of Radio Communications Equipment Series of 1988.

PNP DRD Memo, Addendum and Revision of WTCD – WPNS Sec, 1994 Test Firing Procedure for (Small Arms) Firearms, November 14, 2003.

PNP DRD Memo, DRD Technical Committee Operational Guidelines in the Conduct of Pre-qualification Test of Pistol 9mm and Cal.45 1911-A1, 20 February 2004.

PNP DRD Memo re Summary of Information re Test and Evaluation, Undated.

PNP DRD Pre-qualification Test and Evaluation Test Firing Procedure for Small Arms and Long Firearms, Undated.

RDC, PA, AFP Vehicle Test Parameters.

Standard Operating Procedure No. DRD-2004-02, Result of Eligibility Test and Evaluation Its Application and the Disposition of Sample Firearms Used, 14 October 2004.

Test Parameter, U.S. Army Armament, Munitions and Chemical Command, Rock Island, Illinois, U.S.A.

Test Result Space-Age Slide Action, from Benelli’s SuperNova Tactical By: Payton Miller.

UESB Conferences dated September 29,2006 and October 12, 2006.

UESB Resolution No. 2004-36, Rationalization of the Conduct of PNP Test and Evaluation approved and adopted on December 23,2004.

142

WTCD DRD Test Firing Procedure for (Small Arms) Firearms dated July 24, 2005.

LIST OF TABLES:

Table 1. Sampling Plan, Normal Inspection Level II

Extract of Military Standard 105-E

Lot or Batch Size of the Delivered Items/Equipment

Sample Size for Normal Inspection Level II

Single Sampling Plan

Double Sampling Plan

2 to 8 2 -9 to 15 3 4

16 to 25 5 626 to 50 8 1051 to 90 13 1691 to 150 20 26

151 to 280 32 40281 to 500 50 64

501 to 1200 80 1001201 to 3200 125 1603201 to 10000 200 250

10001 to 35000 315 40035001 to 150000 500 630

150001 to 500000 800 1000500001 and over 1250 1600

143

Table 2. Acceptance Quality Level (AQL)Military Standard 105-E,General Inspection Level II

Extract of Military Standard 105-E (General Inspection Level II)

Lot or Batch Size of the Delivered

Items/ Equipment

1.5 AQL Single Sampling Plan for

Normal Inspection

1.5 AQL Double Sampling Plan for Normal Inspection

Sample Size

Ac cept

Re ject

Sample Size

Ac cept

Re ject

2 to 8 2 0 1

9 to 15 3 0 122

1st 2nd

01

22

16 to 25 5 0 133

1st 2nd

01

22

26 to 50 8 0 155

1st 2nd

01

22

51 to 90 13 0 188

1st 2nd

01

22

91 to 150 20 0 11313

1st 2nd

01

22

151 to 280 32 1 22020

1st 2nd

01

22

281 to 500 50 2 33232

1st 2nd

03

34

501 to 1200 80 3 45050

1st 2nd

14

45

1201 to 3200 125 5 68080

1st 2nd

26

57

3201 to 10000 200 7 8125125

1st 2nd

38

79

10001 to 35000 315 10 11200200

1st 2nd

512

913

35001 to 150000 500 14 15315315

1st 2nd

718

1119

150001 to 500000 800 21 22500500

1st 2nd

1126

1627

144

500001 and over 1250 21 22800800

1st 2nd

1126

1627

Table 3. Military Standard 105-E, Sampling Plan Special Inspection Level S-2/General Inspection Level I

Lot or Batch Size of the Delivered Items/Equipment

Special Inspection

Level

General Inspection

LevelS-2 I

2 to 8 A A

9 to 15 A A

16 to 25 A B

26 to 50 B C

51 to 90 B C

91 to 150 B D

151 to 280 C E

281 to 500 C F

501 to 1200 C G

1201 to 3200 D H

3201 to 10000 D J

10001 to 35000 D K

35001 to 150000 E L150001 to 500000 E M500001 and over E N

145

Table 4. Acceptance Quality Level (AQL) CriteriaMilitary Standard 105-E, Normal Inspection (AQL 6.5 )

Sample Size Code Letter

Sampling Plan

(Double)

Sample Size

NUMBER OF DEFECTSAQL 6.5 (Major) AQL 25 (Minor)

Accept Reject Accept Reject

A · · · ·

B1st 2 0 3

2nd 2 3 4

C1st 3 1 4

2nd 3 4 5

D1st 5 0 2 2 52nd 5 1 2 6 7

E1st 8 0 3 3 72nd 8 3 4 8 9

F1st 13 1 4 5 92nd 13 4 5 12 13

G1st 20 2 5 7 112nd 20 6 7 18 19

H1st 32 3 7 11 162nd 32 8 9 26 27

J1st 50 5 92nd 50 12 13

K1st 80 7 132nd 80 18 19

L1st 125 11 162nd 125 25 27

M1st 2002nd 200

N1st 3152nd 315

P1st 5002nd 500

Q1st 8002nd 800

R1st 12502nd 1250

146

ANNEX 1: AMMUNITION REQUIREMENTS

1. Pre-qualification Test and Evaluation (2 units of sample pistols)2. Product Evaluation at least 2 units sample pistols

TEST PARAMETERS Ammo/RdsRequirements per Sample

CALIBER 9mm .45 Std.45

Hi Cap5.56mm/

9mm SMG.38 7.62mm

1. Pre-firing Examination 15 7 13 30 6 202. Machine Test/Hand Rest

Accuracy Test15 15 16 85 6 50

3. Interchangeability Test 15 7 13 NA 6 NA4. Maintainability Test 15 7 13 NA 6 NA5. Adverse Condition Test

a. Sand/Dust b. Mud c. Water

1515

77

1313

303030

66

202020

6. Drop & Safety 15 7 13 30 6 207. Magazine Drop Test 15 7 13 NA NA NA

8. Endurance Testa. Option 1b. Option 2c. Option 3

5,0003,000

0

5,0003,000

0

5,0003,000

0

5,0003,000

0

3,0001,800

0

5,0003,000

0

9. Proof Load Testa. Option 1b. Option 2c. Option 3

13

50

13

50

13

50

13

50

13

NA

13

50

10. Magnaflux Test 0 0 0 NA 0 NA11. Anti-Cook Off Test NA NA NA 330 NA 33012. Hit-Dispersion Test NA NA NA 100 NA 10013. Maximum Effective Range NA NA NA 60 NA 6014. Area Target Capability NA NA NA 90 NA 6016. Cyclic Rate of Fire NA NA NA 30 NA 2017. Rate of Aimed Fire NA NA NA 30 NA 20

TotalOption 1Option 2Option 3

5,1213,123

170

5,0653,067

114

5,1083,110

157

5,8763,878

925

3,0431,845

NA

5,7413,743

790Allowance (+ 5% of Total)

Option 1Option 2Option 3

259157

10

255153

6

252150

3

294192

45

15795

NA

289187

40Total (Overall)

Option 1Option 2Option 3

53803280

180

53203220

120

53603260

160

61704070

970

31001940

NA

60303930

830

147

Annex 2. Inspection T&E Multi-Trunked Radio System (MTRS) and Other Similar Equipment General Examination

148

Annex 3. Inspection T&E Multi-Trunked Radio System (MTRS) Programming and Instrumentation (T&E) Acceptance Result

149

Annex 4. Inspection/T&E for Multi-Trunked Radio System (MTRS) Adverse Condition Test

150

Annex 5. Inspection/T&E Multi-trunked Radio System (MTRS) Operating Range

151

Annex 6. Trunked Central Controller (T&E) Acceptance Result

DRD Manual Upd8 latest chapters.doc

Documents

Transcript of DRD Manual Upd8 latest chapters.doc