DRAPP 2014 DATA ACCEPTANCE TESTING (DAT) SCOPE OF WORK · Imagery will be acquired during the 2014...

1

DRAPP 2014 DATA ACCEPTANCE TESTING (DAT) SCOPE OF WORK August 13, 2013

Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 2

Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 2

Definitions ................................................................................................................................................. 2

Services to be Rendered ............................................................................................................................... 3

Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 3

Geographic Extent ..................................................................................................................................... 3

Tasks and Deliverables .............................................................................................................................. 4

Task 1 – Establish a region-wide network of Ground Control Points (GCPs). ....................................... 4

Task 2 – Data acceptance testing review of 2014 Digital orthoimagery .............................................. 5

Task 3 – DAT Review of Associated Data Products. .............................................................................. 6

Task 4 – Project Management, Reporting & Customer Service ............................................................ 7

Task 5 – OPTIONAL: Provide QAQC of LIDAR and Derivatives, if acquired. .......................................... 7

Term .............................................................................................................................................................. 7

Project Timeline ............................................................................................................................................ 8

Performance Controls ................................................................................................................................... 8

Notification of Additional Work ............................................................................................................ 8

Notification of Changes in Project Personnel ....................................................................................... 8

Liquidated Damages .............................................................................................................................. 8

Liquidated Damages applied to the Orthoimagery Vendor .................................................................. 9

Appendix A: Map of Project Areas .............................................................................................................. 10

Appendix B - Requirements Summary by Project Area .............................................................................. 11

Appendix C - Data Acceptance Testing Criteria .......................................................................................... 13

Appendix D - Pricing Form .......................................................................................................................... 15

Appendix E: Compliance Summary ............................................................................................................. 16

2

Background

Summary The Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG), acting on behalf of the participants of the Denver Regional Aerial Photography Project (DRAPP), is seeking responses to this RFP from qualified respondents to provide data acceptance testing for high resolution aerial orthoimagery acquired in the Denver region. This region is made up of urban, rural plains and mountainous landscapes.

Imagery will be acquired during the 2014 spring and summer flying season. The resultant orthoimagery and supporting data must be checked for its adherence to industry accuracy standards and DRCOG specifications.

Orthoimagery will be captured in 6 -inch, 1-foot, and 3-inch resolutions over a 6,000-7,000 square mile area.

Definitions Contractor refers to that firm, company, or organization to which the contract will be awarded. References to the Contractor in these specifications shall also apply in full to any subcontractor working for the named Contractor.

DAT refers to data acceptance testing.

DEM refers to a digital elevation model.

Imagery Acquisition Vendor - the vendor that acquires, processes, and delivers the aerial imagery.

DRAPP refers to the Denver Regional Aerial Photography Project.

DRCOG refers to the Denver Regional Council of Governments.

Final imagery refers to the final, orthorectified, DAT- approved imagery tiles.

Interim imagery refers to a preliminary imagery product that is not orthorectified and is not bound by the accuracy standards of the final product. This imagery is made available in a WMS for partners to view.

Orthoimagery refer to a digital image that has the properties of an orthographic projection. It is developed from a perspective aerial photograph by differential rectification to remove image displacements caused by camera tilt and terrain relief.

Participants refers to the contributing partners of the Denver Regional Aerial Photography Project.

Pilot imagery refers to selected areas of orthorectified imagery that must undergo and pass Data Acceptance Testing before the remaining areas are processed into final imagery.

Request for Proposals or RFP refers to this solicitation.

Respondent refers to a firm, company, team or individual responding to this RFP.

3

Services to be Rendered

Overview The successful Respondent will furnish all of the services outlined below.

1. Establish a region-wide network of hard and photo-identifiable ground control points ("well-defined points") for the independent verification of the horizontal positional accuracy of the 2014 digital orthoimagery.

2. Perform Data Acceptance Testing review of all imagery produced by the DRAPP digital orthoimagery vendor.

3. Perform Data Acceptance Testing on all associated deliverables produced by the DRAPP digital orthoimagery vendor.

4. Perform Project Management, Reporting, & Customer Service tasks as requested by the DRCOG Project Manager

5. Optional: Provide Data Acceptance Testing for LIDAR data and derivatives, if requested.

The respondent shall be able to execute and complete all the tasks set out in this RFP in conformance with the following specifications.

• Must have prior experience in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control processes used to review and evaluate digital orthoimagery.

• Must develop, obtain approval for, and execute a DAT plan providing a detailed account of the proposed DAT methodology.

• Has demonstrable knowledge and understanding of relevant national standards and industry norms for the positional accuracy, aesthetic quality, and metadata reporting of digital orthoimagery.

• Must complete the DAT review of each data set within 30 days of delivery. (Imagery will be delivered as soon as possible after it is acquired in flight and processed).

• Must be willing to accept the contractual performance controls outlined elsewhere in this RFP. • Must be accessible during DRCOG business hours throughout the term of the proposed contract. • Must be willing and able to attend DRAPP meetings, if requested by the DRCOG project

manager.

Geographic Extent The project area is comprised of five parts, as generally shown in Appendix A, Map of Project Areas. The Project Areas are:

Project Area 1 – Denver Region and Urbanized Area (Approx. 2,655 square miles)

Project Area 1a - Urbanized Area Subset (Approx. 700 square miles)

Project Area 2 – Eastern Plains Project Area (Approx. 1,300 square miles)

Project Area 3 – Mountainous Project Area (Approx. 1,870 square miles)

Project Area 4 - Weld County Project Area (Approx. 1,100 square miles) - Optionally acquired

4

These areas combined cover approximately 7,000 square miles of the greater Denver metropolitan region. This potentially includes all of the following counties: Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Clear Creek, Denver, Douglas, Gilpin and Jefferson and portions of Weld and Grand.

Exact product boundaries shall be defined by a shapefile provided by DRCOG plus a buffer equivalent to the width of a city block, or approximately 300 feet wide.

Respondents should understand that the need for DAT in the project areas listed above is contingent on member participation and funding. Depending on the cost breakdown by project area, not all project areas may be chosen for the final scope of work.

Tasks and Deliverables The Contractor, contingent upon execution of a subsequent contract, shall furnish all materials, supervision, labor, equipment, and transportation, unless otherwise specified in this RFP to complete the following tasks and deliver the listed products.

Task 1 – Establish a region-wide network of Ground Control Points (GCPs). The Contractor will establish a region-wide network of GCPs across the DRAPP 2014 project area. This network of GCPs will consist of both “hard” panels and photo-identifiable points ("well-defined points"). All points will be established using the criteria and a methodology developed with and approved by DRCOG.

Requirements of the Contractor include:

1. Submit a GCP plan for establishing sufficient ground control, and of the necessary accuracy, to perform the Data Acceptance Testing of the digital orthophoto processing.

2. Paneling, surveying, and recording of hard control points. All points will be surveyed to an agreed level of accuracy, by a Colorado licensed professional surveyor, following industry standards. Panel point locations will be described and sketched on GPS Log Sheets kept during GPS field observations. Hard control point (panel points) locations will be determined by extending GPS baselines from NGS first order or better control stations utilizing Survey Grade GPS receivers.

3. The identification, surveying, and recording of photo-identifiable points. All points will be surveyed to an agreed level of accuracy, by a Colorado licensed professional surveyor, following industry standards.

4. The combined hard and photo GCPs should be distributed throughout the project area.

Deliverables:

1. Within 15 days of contract execution, a preliminary document (GCP Plan) outlining the Contractor’s proposed approach for establishing a network of ground control points across the project area is due to DRCOG. This document should, at a minimum, address the following topics:

a. Proposed approach for the selection and placement of hard panels. b. A similar statement on the approach for photo-identifiable GCPs. c. An overview of the surveying approach to measure the location of each point.

5

d. A summary of the proposed accuracy specifications to be followed in capturing all the points.

2. Within 60 days of contract execution, but before the commencement of imagery acquisition by the digital orthoimagery vendor, the identification, placement, surveying and recording of a network "hard" GCPs across the project area.

3. Within 60 days of contract execution, the identification, surveying, and recording of a network of photo-identifiable GCPs from across the project area.

4. A summary of all hard and photo-identifiable GCPS, delivered as an ESRI shapefile(s) or ArcGIS file geodatabase and in a datasheet (PDF), with geodetic data as attributes. Attribution should include:

a. A unique reference ID b. Actual coordinates (in Lat/Long, UTM, and Colorado State Plane) c. Ellipsoid height d. Orthometric height e. Geoid model f. Brief text description of the physical location of the monument. g. Statement of GPS level of accuracy (especially for photo-identifiable points) h. Statement on what datums and adjustments were used to establish the coordinates i. Photos of the point (in the datasheet only)

Task 2 – Data acceptance testing review of 2014 Digital orthoimagery The Contractor will perform a comprehensive review of every tile of the 2014 DRAPP imagery, in accordance with the Data Acceptance Testing methodology outlined in their response to DRCOG’s Request for Proposals. The DAT process will include at least all of the checks outlined in the attached appendix (Appendix C - Data Acceptance Testing Criteria). The DAT Contractor will also perform subsequent review on all imagery that is rejected through the first DAT review.

The DAT process will verify the positional accuracy of the imagery and ensure its aesthetic and functional quality. In general terms, the DAT review will examine all the imagery for the following types of errors:

1. Images that do not meet the project’s accuracy specifications: Horizontal accuracy of well-defined ground features depicted on delivered ortho images and mosaics shall be as follows, all expressed as 90% confidence interval values:

o 1-foot ground sample distance (GSD) pixel size products: ±4 feet

o 6-inch GSD products: ±2 feet

o 3-inch GSD products: ±1 foot

2. Misalignments in linear features (roads, curbs, building edges, etc.) resulting from poorly aligned mosaics or other imagery processing errors.

3. Warped or wavy bridges/overpasses/viaducts/railroad lines/warehouses/other large linear physical features.

6

4. Obvious seams between images. 5. Blurred or out-of-focus imagery, blemishes, “noise”, smears, or other artifacts introduced in the

acquisition or processing of the imagery. 6. Pronounced changes in color balance and contrast. 7. Dark shadows or bright/washed-out spots in the imagery. 8. Buildings that obscure more than 20 percent of adjacent roadways and other transportation

features. 9. Obscured valley bottoms in the mountain areas.

Criteria Scoring:

The Contractor shall evaluate each of the parameters outlined in the criteria (Appendix C - Data Acceptance Testing Criteria). Each parameter shall be scored on a “Pass/Fail” basis, governed by the “rejection condition” set out in the Performance Controls section. Overall rejection of any tile may be based on any of the four categorical requirements – Positional Accuracy, Aesthetics, Metadata, or File Format.

At a minimum, tiles shall be scored as a “fail” under any of the following conditions:

• A “fail” on any parameters weighted 3 or higher. • A “fail” on any parameter in more than one of the categorical requirements. • More than two “fails” on any of the aesthetic parameters.

Other failures will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

The Contractor may also assign any tile a “provisional pass” if they deem the error minor enough to simply alert the orthoimagery vendor to the problem and have them fix it without further review. The Contractor shall report the results of this testing to the Project Manager who will in turn relay the results to the imagery contractor for remediation.

Deliverables:

1. A DAT plan providing a detailed account of the DAT methodology. 2. DAT testing reports documenting review process and outcomes for each dataset reviewed.

Reports should be submitted documenting review of pilot, interim and final imagery.

Task 3 – DAT Review of Associated Data Products. The Contractor will examine all other data produced as part of the imagery production process. This will include the following:

1. Flightlines and overlap documentation; 2. Ground control and AT data/reports; 3. Metadata; 4. DEM used for orthorectification, with metadata; 5. All calibration and analytical reports produced by the Orthoimagery Vendor.

7

Deliverables:

1. Reports reviewing the materials listed above, with statements about acceptance or failure.

Task 4 – Project Management, Reporting & Customer Service The Contractor is expected to communicate frequently with the DRCOG Project Manager to ensure that the project stays on schedule and that product quality meets specifications. This includes:

Status reports to DRCOG’s Project Manager (via phone or email), as requested;

Attendance at DRAPP partner meetings, as requested;

Attendance at project meetings with all DRAPP vendors, as requested;

Invoices, submitted within 60 days of the completion of each task;

The Contractor may be called on at various times throughout the term of the contract to provide expert advice on matters relating to the quality of the digital orthoimagery.

Task 5 – OPTIONAL: Provide QAQC of LIDAR and Derivatives, if acquired. Contingent on funding, DRCOG may pursue a LIDAR acquisition in portions of project areas 1, 2, and 3. DRCOG may require an independent vendor to review deliverables, which will include the following:

• Raw Point Cloud; • Classified Point Cloud; • TIN; • DEM; • 1 ft (Area 1a only) and 2ft Contours (Area 1 only); • System Calibration, Collection, Processing, and QAQC Reports.

If the respondent has experience with evaluation of this type of information, the RFP response should include a summary of their expertise, proposed methodology for performing DAT and a description of how results would be reported to DRCOG. The optional pricing form (Appendix D - Pricing Form) shall also be submitted.

Please note that this task is optional and does not have to be addressed in the RFP response.

Term The awarded contract will begin on the date it is executed by DRCOG and ends, unless sooner terminated under the Terms and Conditions of the Contract or extended by a contract amendment, on May 31, 2015.

Subject to the availability of funding and Contractor performance, the awarded contract may be extended for another consecutive term, scheduled approximately for the time period between January 2016 and May of 2017.

8

Project Timeline Below is a preliminary project timeline. This is to be used for planning purposes but is subject to change at DRCOG's discretion. A final schedule will be outlined in the Contract.

Dec -Jan 2014 Statement of Work is written; contract finalized

Jan-Mar 2014 Collection of GCPs

Feb 2014 Kick-off meeting with DRCOG and other vendors

Mar- Apr 2014 Spring Imagery Acquisition by the Imagery Acquisition Vendor

Jun 2014 Summer Imagery Acquisition by the Imagery Acquisition Vendor

July - Nov 2014 Final Image Processing by the Imagery Acquisition Vendor

Mar - Nov 2014 DAT of Interim, Pilot, and Final Imagery with associated files.

Dec - Jan 2015 Deliveries to Participants by the Imagery Acquisition Vendor

May 31 2015 Customer Service Period ends for DRAPP vendors

Performance Controls

Notification of Additional Work The Contractor agrees to notify DRCOG in writing within 30 days of all new contracts entered into by the Contractor throughout the duration of the DRAPP contact. The DRAPP participants will review this information in light of its potential impact on the ability of the Contractor to continue to successfully serve the DRAPP project. DRCOG may seek written assurance from the Contractor that they have the resources and capacity to take on additional work without any impact on the DRAPP project.

Notification of Changes in Project Personnel The Contractor agrees to notify DRCOG in writing within 30 days of any change in personnel assigned to this task. The DRAPP participants will review this information in light of its potential impact on the ability of the Contractor to continue to successfully serve the DRAPP project. DRCOG may seek written assurance from the Contractor that they have the resources and capacity to continue the project without any impact on the DRAPP project.

Liquidated Damages Contractor acknowledges that timely, accurate, and complete delivery of imagery and related digital products is crucial to the success of this project and that DRCOG will suffer financial loss if the work is not completed within the milestone and delivery dates specified in the contract. The parties also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties in proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by DRCOG. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, Contractor and DRCOG agree that as liquidated damages for delay, Contractor shall pay DRCOG as follows:

Liquidated damages shall be assessed against the Contractor for every calendar day a documented and mutually agreed-upon milestone or delivery date set forth in the contract is not met. If the milestone falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a holiday, the deadline for performing the obligation falls to the next working day.

The amount of liquidated damages is as follows:

9

• Days one (1) through fifteen (15): 0.05 percent of the total contract price

• Days sixteen (16) through thirty (30): 0.10 percent of the total contract price

• Day thirty-one (31) and each day thereafter: 0.15 percent of the total contract price

After sixty days, the Contractor shall be in default, at which time DRCOG may, at its option, terminate the contract, recover liquidated damages through the date of termination, and additionally, seek damages for breach.

DRCOG at its sole option may also choose to waive all or any portion of liquidated damages due. Such a waiver must be in writing signed by the DRCOG Executive Director, and a waiver by DRCOG with respect to a failure to meet any one or more milestone or delivery dates shall not be deemed as, nor construed to require, a waiver with respect to failure to meet any other milestone or delivery dates.

Liquidated Damages applied to the Orthoimagery Vendor For the information of the DAT Contractor, DRCOG may seek liquidated damages from its Orthoimagery Vendor for imagery that fails the DAT review a fourth time and/or misses a deadline. The text from their contract is outlined below: "In the event that a scheduled delivery fails DAT review more than four times, DRCOG may, at its option, (i) require delivery of those tiles that have failed DAT review but in such case the price paid for such delivery shall be reduced by a mutually agreed amount or, in the absence of mutual agreement, a pro-rata amount determined with reference to the number of failed tiles as compared to the total number of tiles within the delivery, or (ii) DRCOG may declare Contractor in breach and seek damages and any other remedies available to DRCOG for such breach."

10

Appendix A: Map of Project Areas

11

Appendix B - Requirements Summary by Project Area Project Area Requirements Detail

Area 1 - Denver Region

Resolution 6-inch GSD Accuracy ±2 feet @ 90% ci

Overlaps

Nominal 60% forward overlap and 30% sidelap Less than 20% roadways & transportation features obscured

Nominal 80% forward overlap and 60% sidelap in designated areas

Collection Window and Conditions

3/1/2014 to 4/15/2014 No less than 35 degree sun altitude in March and 40 degrees in April 10am to 2pm acquisition window for designated areas

Area 1a - Urbanized Area

Subset

Resolution 3-inch GSD Accuracy ±1 foot @ 90% ci

Overlaps





Area 2 - Eastern Plains

Resolution 1-foot GSD Accuracy ±4 feet @ 90% ci Overlaps Nominal 60% forward overlap and 30% sidelap



Area 3 - Mountainous

Resolution 1-foot GSD Accuracy ±4 feet @ 90% ci

Overlaps Nominal 60% forward overlap and 30% sidelap Ensure visibility of valley bottoms


6/1/2014 to 6/30/2014 No less than 45 degree sun altitude in June 10am to 2pm acquisition window for designated areas

12

Area 4 - OPTIONAL Weld

County

Resolution 6-inch GSD Accuracy ±2 feet @ 90% ci

Overlaps





All Project Areas

Projections and Coordinate Systems

Horizontal datum NAD83 Colorado SPCS Central Zone (NOAA 0502), US survey feet

Colorado SPCS Northern Zone (NOAA 0501), US survey feet USGS UTM Zone 13 North, meters Vertical datum NAVD88

Flight planning

Acquire necessary permits Meet with FAA at DIA North/South flight lines Plot the project boundary on the flight plan

Conditions No haze, smoke, snow, dust, floodwaters, or environmental factors that obscure detail Less than 5% cloud cover and/or shadows

Ground control and block adjustment

All targets set up under supervision of a PLS

Use local government-provided cadastral monuments whenever possible

Tiling schema Each uncompressed tile to be 1mi x 1mi Each compressed tile to be 10mi x 10mi

Image file formats

GeoTiff (no compression) with associated world file (.tfw)

JPeg2000 (compressed at 10:1) with separate associated world file

MrSID generation 3 MG2 (compressed at 10:1) with associated SDW file

Metadata FGDC-compliant format in XML format for each tile

Able to import into latest two versions of ArcGISDesktop software

DEM Update existing or use LiDAR (if acquired)

13

Appendix C - Data Acceptance Testing Criteria

Parameter Criteria Rejection ConditionWeight

(Highest = 1, Lowest = 5)

1-foot ground sample distance (GSD) pixel size products: ±4 feet,

Any data sample of well-defined image points that does not satisfy this accuracy for a

specified area, when compared with independent control data

6-inch GSD products: ±2 feet



3-inch GSD products: ±1 foot



1

One or more ground feature with a shift of more than four (4) pixels for the 1-foot ortho)

One or more ground feature with a shift of more than three (3) pixels for the 6-inch ortho)

Warping of streets/light rail/railroad or other linear ground

Alignment of streets and other linear ground features true to real condition

One or more warped linear feature(s) 1

Color balance of Tiles Even/uniform color within each tile One or more color anomaly 2

Warping of bridges/overpasses/viaducts

Bridges approximately true to real condition One or more uncorrected bridge(s) 2

Blurred or out of focus imagery No visible blurring or out of focus imagery One or more instance of blurring per tile 2

Smearing of terrain No visible smearing One or more instance of smearing per tile 2

Color balance near infrared (NIR)Even/uniform color across subregions for NIR

(4th band)One or more color anomaly 2

Color balance-sub-regionsEven/uniform color across each of the project’s

sub-regions which includes the urban, plains and mountainous areas

One or more color anomaly 3

Contrast-tiles Even/uniform contrast within each tile One or more contrast anomaly 3

Contrast-sub-regionsEven/uniform contrast across each of the project’s sub-regions including the urban,

plains and mountainous areasOne or more contrast anomaly 3

Ability to see ground features in shadows

Ground features that are least four pixels in length visible within dark shadows

One or more ground feature not interpretable due to shadow

3

One or more ground feature of more than four pixels that cannot be interpreted due to

brightness of the imagery.The tile’s overall brightness does not meet the

contrast specs.Blemishes, “noise”, blooming, bleeding or other artifacts introduced in the acquisition or

No artifacts such as photo scratches, blemishes, bleeding, blank pixels, etc. visible

More than three artifacts visible per tile 3

Seams-within tiles No visible seams or discontinuities visible More than one visible seam 3

Edge matching

Ground features that are at least four pixels in length visible within bright areas

Ability to see ground features in bright areas

3

DAT Criteria Summary Sheet

1No visible shifts or discontinuities in ground features resulting from poor edge matching

within tiles or across final tiles

POSITIONAL ACCURACY

AESTHETICS

Horizontal accuracy of ortho porducts

1

14

Tall buildings No more than 20 % of roadway obscuredBuilding lean over any street obscures more than 20% of the roadway features (including

sidewalks) along that street.4

Mountain valleys No more than 20% of valley bottom obscured More than one streambed obscured 4

Large water bodies Water should not show noise or glare or t t b t til t b di

More than one water body with noise or glare t t b t til

4

Metadata file must be present for each final image tile.

Metadata in the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) compliant format shall be delivered with each image file in XML format

and can be imported by two most recent versions of ESRI ArcGIS Desktop software

Must be GeoTIFF format File missing TFW file

Must include separate but associated world (TFW) file

File is compressed TIFF

Must be uncompressed TIFF File is incorrect/different version/format

Must be compatible with two most recent versions of ESRI ArcGIS, Bentley Microstation, AutoDesk’s AutoCAD and Lizardtech’s MrSID

compression software

Incompatible with specified software

Must be compressed at 10:1 compression ratio File has incorrect compression rate

Must include a separate but associated world file

File missing an associated world file



Georeferencing information embedded in the header of the MrSID image file

File is incorrect/different version/format

Must be compressed at 10:1 compression ratio File has incorrect compression rate

Must include a separate but associated world file

File missing an associated world file



File is incorrect/different version/format

Correct format, version and names (imagery and all other delivered data sets)

All delivered digital data files must be correct to the specifications set out in the Scope of

WorkOne or more file not to specifications 4

DEM section tiles delivered in IMG format

Mass points and breaklines giving an accurate depiction of the terrain

File is incorrect/different version/format(s) 4

MrSID with separate but associated SDW file MG2 generation 3 compressed at 10:1

2

METADATA

Tagged Information File Format (TIFF) containing all 4 bands as a single GeoTIFF with associated ESRI world file in order to support legacy ESRI software implementations that require the header file

2

JPEG2000 (JP2) and associated ESRI World Files

2

AESTHETICS

FILE FORMATS

Metadata present & completeNo metadata file. One or more missing

metadata element(s)3

15

Appendix D - Pricing Form

Data Acceptance Testing

Please provide the costs to produce all deliverables for each project area.

Area Cost per sq. mile Total

Project Area 1 - Denver Region

Project Area 1a - Urbanized Area Subset

Project Area 2 - Eastern Plains

Project Area 3 - Mountainous

Project Area 4 - Weld County Optional Extent

Project Total

OPTIONAL - LIDAR & Derivatives QAQC Please provide the costs for DAT for the LiDAR deliverables for each project area.

Area Cost per sq. mile Total Project Area 1 Project Area 1a Project Area 2 Project Area 3 Project Total

16

Appendix E: Compliance Summary

Company Name: _____________________________________________________

Company Official & Title: _____________________________________________________

Mailing Address: _____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

City/State/Zip: _____________________________________________________

Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________

Fax Number: _____________________________________________________

Email: _____________________________________________________

Please check boxes to verify inclusion in response:

Cover Letter

Technical Approach

Evidence of Appropriate Skills and Experience

Evidence of Past Performance

Cost Information

References

Appendices

Acknowledgement of insurance requirements and Respondent’s ability to secure all coverage’s

DRAPP 2014 DATA ACCEPTANCE TESTING (DAT) SCOPE OF WORK · Imagery will be acquired during the 2014...

Documents

Transcript of DRAPP 2014 DATA ACCEPTANCE TESTING (DAT) SCOPE OF WORK · Imagery will be acquired during the 2014...